5 Unethical publication practices journal editors hate to see

Plagiarism can become a problem not only when authors fail to cite sources in a paper but also when they fall into the trap of self-plagiarism. To check your manuscript for any instance of accidental plagiarism or missing citations, head over to bit.ly/3stzQJm.
It’s important to understand what is acceptable and what is not in the academic publishing world to conduct and publish your research successfully.
One of the most common unethical publication practices that authors may not even be aware of is that they can submit their researcher to only one journal at a time. Failure to disclose competing conflicts of interest may also lead to journal rejection or retraction. Moreover, journal editors are increasingly getting wary of dealing with honorary authorship and ghost authorship. Lastly, duplicate publications and salami slicing are other common unethical publication practices that can hurt your academic career and discredit your research findings.
Watch this conversation between Dr. Donald Samulack, President US Operations, Editage, Dr. Anne Woods, Chief Nursing Officer at WKH, and Shawn Kennedy, Editor in Chief, American Journal of Nursing on unethical publication practices in academic publishing and strategies to consciously avoid them.
This video is part of our effort to help authors develop an understanding of unethical publication practices.
Looking to streamline your publication journey? Explore Editage’s (www.editage.com/) English editing, academic translation, and publication support services and work with top experts in your subject area.
Explore Editage Insights, a multilingual learning platform for researchers with 10,000+ free resources on research and scholarly publishing. To learn, share experiences, stay updated, and receive expert advice, visit www.editage.com/insights.

[@a.a.7416]

Thank you for posting. It would be also interesting to discuss conflict of interest among editors from various journals, with some (or many) publishing in journals from related fields. It would also be interesting to discuss why so many journal editors, associate editors, and members of their editorial board 'use' their own journal to publish, what the procedure for reviewing their work is, the transparency of the process, and the ethical issues involved. Lastly, it would be interesting to discuss why so many journal editors take an eternity (e.g., 6, 9, or more months) to send manuscripts for review, or simply do not reply to authors' messages asking the status of their paper. Would you be editing a KZbin video discussing these issues? Thank you again.

[@dr.prakashn.gholap6595]

V. Informative Discussion,

[@trinathsahoo6717]

Thanks lot sir for your valuable information

[@jonathanschenck8154]

Idk about false positives..? But this is Not the medium I was looking for.

[@jigerwala420]

bla Bla bla bla