5 Yrs For Shooting Himself? | 100 Gun Control Laws INCOMING!!! | Biden Was Right?!?

[@HiVoltish]

Only a citizen has rights.

[@ARFCOMNews]

Bless your heart. That means YOU don't have any rights until you can prove you're a citizen. That's not how things work in this country. Maybe you should find one that doesn't believe in silly things like due process and inalienable rights.

[@mountainman8602]

Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?

[@snoop_lion]

@@ARFCOMNews the rights are only for citizens within the jurisdiction of the US. We don't give people in other countries the same rights as we have. That same illegal immigrant with 170 illegally owned firearms, will suddenly not have any gun rights when they are deported back to Mexico.

[@oldgrizzlygamer]

@@ARFCOMNews I disagree, while we extend certain rights to non-citizens, they are not guaranteed under the constitution. We do it as a courtesy because we believe in the ideal that "all men are created equal" but in the end, if they commit a crime, and that's any crime including possession of guns, drugs, illegal entry, then those rights we extend can and should be revoked.

[@barfo281]

@@snoop_lion Well, you're a proven leftist. Using your logic, "illegal aliens" have no protections against murder or slavery then, right? Just admit you're a freedom hating leftist and carry on. Otherwise, read the Declaration of Independence preamble and repent. Hint: It does not say, "All American CITIZENS are created equal and that ONLY THEY are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights......and nobody else has rights, because reasons."

[@joshandmanuela]

Hunter commits actual crimes. Gets a pardon. Matt Hoover makes KZbin videos. Five years in prison. Some people are above the law while others get punished without committing crimes. This is why they call it "Just Us."

[@barfo281]

what crimes?

[@ARFCOMNews]

He lied on the 4473 and possessed a gun while he was an unlawful user of a controlled substance (cocaine). As I've said, neither should be a crime, but he was convicted. He was also convicted of other crimes and his father pardoned him for even more crimes that we don't know about, starting in April of 2014.

[@barfo281]

@@ARFCOMNews Again - he was convicted for non-crimes. 4473 is unconstitutional and is not supposed to exist. But it was not necessary for Slow Joe to pardon Robbie, because RINO Trump said he would pardon him on Hugh Hewitt's show, saying sending a president's son to prison would be "a very bad for the country." RINO Trump also told Slow Rogan, "I saved Hillary from jail." RINIO Trump told that to Hugh Hewitt too: “I could have gone after Hillary. I could have gotten Hillary Clinton very easily. And when they say lock her up, whenever they said ‘lock her,’ you know, they’d start, 30,000 people, ‘lock her up, lock her up.’ What did I do? I always say take it easy, just relax. We’re winning. Take it easy. Take it easy.” He added: “I could have had her put in jail. And I decided I didn’t want to do that. I thought it would look terrible. You had the wife of the president of the United States going to jail. I thought it would be very bad if we did that. And I made sure that didn’t happen, OK? I thought it would be bad.”

[@scors1er]

​@ARFCOMNews don't forget the videos of him doing crack and solicitation of a prostitute

[@davinci3259]

@@ARFCOMNews A blanket pardon to cover 11 years not only for what he was convicted for but also anything else that he may have done. If they find out that he murdered 6 people in that time frame he couldn't be convicted of it. Complete B.S.

[@Zulu55far]

By owning so many guns, he was trying really hard to assimilate into America. The fact he was able to buy 170 guns says gun control laws do nothing.

[@jeffhuntley2921]

#freeCRS

[@jeffhuntley2921]

For what it’s worth. Ytube won’t let me put p u s s i e s in a comment. Which is why I spend the majority of my time on Rhumble

[@jeffhuntley2921]

Ytube kunts took down my comment. Come moderators are all bundles of sticks

[@barfo281]

Not on RINO Trump's watch.

[@z3ntropy]

On the topic of gun ownership for ex-felons: Bad things happen to ex-felons too. Once agreed upon a debt to society, there should be no secondary unwritten, unpayable debt that renders any united states citizen second class eternally. Either make sentences harsher, or figure out how to rehabilitate

[@jacobstaten2366]

Not to mention it makes life harder outside of prison, so they become desperate to survive and have to resort to other illegal means to do it. So it's a vicious cycle.

[@svbarryduckworth628]

This is the way.

[@syrtycon7299]

Once you’ve served your time you should get all your rights back. If someone is saying they can’t trust that person with a weapon then why are they out of jail in the first place.

[@kevincornell1439]

i agree with none violent felons. letting sexual offenders own guns is fucked up.

[@carlcox7332]

​@@kevincornell1439sexual predators shouldn't be let out in the first place. Anyone that takes advantage of someone vulnerable or intentionally changes another's life by their actions like with murder shouldn't be out. Victimless crimes shouldn't even be treated the same as sexual crimes or murder

[@hersh328]

Because we don't want to give the government the right to hold people indefinitely because they deem them dangerous with no regard for the sentence given to them by a court of law?

[@ARFCOMNews]

Kevin, first you have to explain why you want to release sexual predators.

[@kevincornell1439]

@@ARFCOMNews because it cost tax dollars sir!

[@opencarry3860]

I still think this channel should have over one million subs. Quality content and no compromise on Second Amendment rights.

[@Matt-uj9wl]

agreed, 10/10 memes as well

[@deathlis]

@@Matt-uj9wl 12/10, which goes into the negative for a -2. Because I'm too busy reading them and chuckling to listen and end up having to watch twice.

[@RedHuntsman]

too many good ole boys out there who want big government to turn on the other side rather than get rid of big government.

[@khester7397]

​@@RedHuntsman You hit the nail on the head.

[@ARFCOMNews]

@RedHuntsman gets it. Far too many people beat their chest about liberty when they are totally lacking in any principles. They don't believe in the natural human right to self determination for all mankind. They like guns. And they want to be ALLOWED to buy guns. And they're scared of brown people with guns. And they want government to send men with guns to put people in cages for doing anything they don't like. They want to be allowed to do everything they enjoy while government oppresses everyone else.

[@Dingleberry1856]

FREE MATT HOOVER!!!!!!!! FREE CHRIS IRVING!!!!!!

[@leviransom9910]

Thank you for mentioning Matt Hoover! Keep him in the conversation!

[@geofftimm2291]

Can a citizen sue each and every sponsor of those bills, for attempting to overthrow the government, withdraw recognition of the US Constitution and succeed from the union?

[@0Logan05]

Find each and every single Anti American bill supporter!

[@michaelsmith3381]

You’re not a hypocrite, you stated your case firmly and stand by it. You make your distinctions clear, and if people can’t understand something you put out that clearly then it’s their problem.

[@ARFCOMNews]

Based. Thank you.

[@charlesmckinley29]

@@ARFCOMNewsthe best way to get rid of bad law is by it’s strict application.

[@somebsaddy]

Apparently I am a hypocrite. If these are my peers, I accept all that comes with it. I love Andrew, spicy and all the arfcom crew.

[@burleydad]

Ideas are much more dangerous than guns.

[@ARFCOMNews]

Fact. Newsweek has killed more people than any of my guns.

[@oo7-ro6bu]

The government has no authority to make any laws or regulations against arms per the Constitution of the United States.

[@patriotcountry4716]

Yeah ,and foreigners have no right to invade our country

[@ominousentity1115]

Yeah it does government says so😊

[@ARFCOMNews]

Government has only such authority as the People allow, and only so long as we continue to tolerate their existence.

[@ominousentity1115]

@@ARFCOMNews It was a joke but yes.

[@ominousentity1115]

@@kristianbraun5604 No. Federal law cannot violate the constitution.

[@wildcat8598]

Anyone else stop paying attention to “laws” made by criminals? At this point I could give a shit what they tell us we can’t do. Just do what you want and if some oathbreaker wants to enforce unconstitutional “laws” than maybe they should think twice next time? Or not have that chance?

[@mitchelltriplett7974]

One of the few actual pro 2A guntubers out there. Shall not be infringed means EXACTLY that! Keep up the good work.

[@donaldfuller5058]

I think any free human should have the right to own and keep working weapons of military grade regardless of their country or back ground.

[@ariabritton9669]

when someone asks me "even criminals?" my answer is "yes, even criminals". because the government chooses who is/isn't a criminal. and if criminals aren't allowed to own guns, there's nothing concrete stopping the government from labelling those who it detests as "criminals" so they won't be allowed to defend themselves.

[@larryphelps6607]

in their own country or background.

[@yourfreedomisanillusion]

And imagine what a felon who is evil could do with a truck. Oh wait, we don’t have to imagine, it happened in Nice, France. Also like 200 times in China. Also last year in America, and the year before that. And this year.

[@ominousentity1115]

@Fury-161 Then why let them out of prison?

[@TrippinBusa]

Ban assault trucks

[@yourfreedomisanillusion]

Exactly. If you have a violent criminal history, you don’t get out. SA or grape, you don’t get out. Anything w minors, you don’t get out. Use a gun to commit crimes? You don’t get out. Everyone else who committed a non-violent crime, they keep their God-given rights. Period.

[@frye11229]

@@yourfreedomisanillusionunless you’re god you can’t touch god given *inherent* rights. The constitution does not create rights for people, it creates limitations for government action. If everyone studied civics instead of social studies in school we wouldn’t have this issue based on simple misunderstanding.

[@GreggR2020]

In a state that has some of the MOST STRICT gun laws. Tell me again how gun control works out for criminals.... I'll wait.

[@creamyhole2045]

Arfcom is the best, one of the few 2A absolutists. That kyles mom "what WHAT WHAT" clip was a perfect edit too

[@barfo281]

99% of "pro2A" KZbinrs are NOT pro2A. They're infringement-supporting phonies, whose audiences are made up (99%) of infringement supporting Fudds and Trump cultists. They're all the "I'm pro2A, BUT..." types.

[@ARFCOMNews]

Thank you.

[@sanguinembwun6475]

Can’t these politicians be sued in civil and federal court for violating the constitutional rights of their constituents by passing these bills? Chevron deference shouldn’t apply as they are actively acting outside the scope of their duties and powers by passing unconstitutional legislation!

[@barfo281]

No, because you people vote for them to violate your rights. RINO Trump did more against 2A than any other president and y'all voted for him again.

[@nickhill3033]

What, what, what! Love you bro!

[@retselyarrh3895]

Why the ATF considered still considers a strip lower to be a firearm!!!!! And anything that can readily be made into a firearm is considered a firearm!!! They can’t have it both ways!!!!

[@stevematthews684]

Ouch! The moment of Zen was SO SPICY! Great content as usual.

[@billsilva1740]

We agree on this one. If someone has served their time then they should have all of their rights restored. If you don't trust someone to have a gun then they should still be in jail. Oh and moment of zen was great😂.

[@mikelyon5595]

You pointing out elitist hypocrisy is not hypocrisy! You're educating the public!

[@robertcook5201]

A minor felon (1st DUI, no injuries, in NY) has been trying to get their 2nd Amendment rights restored for 40 years, unsuccessfully.

[@CanuckWolfman]

If you can pardon a known person for unknown crimes, can you pardon unknown *persons* for known *crimes?* Like, say, every person who violated the NFA, known or unknown, convicted or unconvicted between 26 June, 1934 and the inauguration of the 48th President?

[@ARFCOMNews]

I don't see any constitutional reason that Trump couldn't pardon every Republican for every federal crime, ever.

[@barfo281]

@@ARFCOMNews You mean other than that RINO Trump is an anti-2A, Constitution-hating leftist clown and conman.

[@barfo281]

Lincoln/Johnson pardoned Confederates. Jimmy Carter pardoned "draft dodgers" in a blanket pardon.

[@ARFCOMNews]

Lol. I didn't say he would or should. Just that I think it would be legal. Also hilarious.

[@steveninaz9576]

Thank you Sir

[@JTank11B]

We love you too ARFCOM!!!! 😘

[@ominousentity1115]

The parole system's job is to find out which prisoners are good enough to be put back into society. Why are we taking rights away once people are off parole?

[@johnniewasr5740]

Because way too many idiots support the felon gun ban

[@MrJeronlewis]

The 4473 doesn't pass the Bruen analysis anyway.

[@barfo281]

@MrJeronlewis Bruen UPHOLDS infringements. Stop being so gullible. Heller and Bruen UPHOLD INFRINGEMENTS. Anyone who tells you differently is lying to you. Heller says the 2A means "MAY be infringed" and Bruen reaffirmed Heller and said infringements are "constitutionally permissible." Bruen refers to Heller 167 times, but mentions the 2A 149 times, in comparison. Which one do you think SCROTUS thinks is more important, Heller or 2A? Answer: Heller. Heller and Bruen were NOT pro2A court opinions. They uphold infringements and tell gun grabbers to be more clever and specific about infringing in order to satisfy SCROTUS. SCROTUS does not care about 2A or the rest of the Constitution. Our rights are not defined by government demigods in magical black robes.

[@rossfelton1955]

Thanks

[@AtlasRandGaming]

Rights four citizens only.

[@SteelWolf13]

02:14 Thats a lot of wasted floor space. Could put in a small indoor target range. Or at least a dry fire sim area :)

[@PresidentElectLeRoy]

No hypocrisy detected. I was hoping he would appeal on 2a as well.

[@chethaynes5802]

Thank you

[@travisweldmaster7815]

Worst zen ever I feel violated

[@badgerkitteh]

RIP Peanut

[@lonebikeroftheapocalypse9527]

What about Fred?

[@BrokenMedic]

The courts have ruled that “we the people” is American citizens not illegals

[@ARFCOMNews]

Yeah, that's why cops get to search everybody's car without a warrant. All they have to do is claim they thought the person might be an illegal and the 4A disappears in a cloud of magical smoke.

[@edb4526]

Thank you.

[@roproart6529]

BRO.... this is a great video.

[@ARFCOMNews]

Glad you think so! We publish every Wednesday and Friday.

[@garyb.4080]

What happened to Texas, you know, six gun toting dudes, quick drawing fellas?

[@ARFCOMNews]

It was all marketing. TX was never what they claimed to be. TX is as close to the East Coast as you can get and still pretend you're "the west".

[@flylowlevel817]

@@ARFCOMNews Hey now, at least spell it out if you are going to make fun of us. 🤣

[@lonebikeroftheapocalypse9527]

Texass elects a lot of the dumbest democRATS around.

[@barfo281]

Texas was never as free as Texicans love to pretend it is. And it still is not. Texas' reputation was always fake hype, like RINO Trump.

[@MrLandslide84]

At least you can turn the comedy of our legal system into actual comedy for us lmao. Fast pews has been added to my vocab now. 😆

[@maverick4462]

Simon and his elegedly 😂😂

[@georgea5991]

I knew he was going to be pardoned before he was even convicted. Idk how everybody is so shocked. I need a job predicting stuff like this.

[@ARFCOMNews]

I don't think anyone doubted that he would be pardoned, but I think his dad expected Kamala to do it for him.

[@larryderagowski8273]

Please free Mat Hoover

[@barfo281]

RINO Trump would sooner pardon his BFF's girlfriend Ghislaine.

[@alphaa7682]

3:55 well thats crap because even a stripped lower to the AFT is still pretty much a "firearm"

[@angryheathen3463]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Maybe I am missing it, but I don’t see the line about unless convicted of a crime.

[@barfo281]

“He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” - Thomas Paine

[@copper12heavy69]

I can't tell you how happy I was to see Simon Whistler in there. Love the cutaways, love the content,A+++.

[@ARFCOMNews]

Thank you. I love you.

[@johntrimpe2032]

auto like and comment for including Simon "Factboi" Whisler. I love his channels (all 5 quadrillion of them). I recomend his megaprojects vid on the history of the gun, probably the most fair, balanced, and unbiased documentary produced by europeans (as highly unlikely as that usually seems to us utilizers of freedom units and promoters of the pew pew lifestyle). Also, great work by you guys; the pewproganda is powerful with "HEY, YOU GUYS!!!"

[@barfo281]

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson

[@red47fire24]

Allen’s are aloud to get guns in some states. Bass pro teaches that in class about the 4473.

[@vulgardisplayoftruth2060]

Welcome to Cosco, I love you...

[@phiksit]

Just generally saying a person should not be released from jail / prison because they can't be "trusted with a gun" is now on my list of the dumbest things I've ever heard.. along with felons should be allowed to possess machine guns.

[@marcofguzman3075]

Fantastic image of Matt Hover 👏 👌 👍

[@wileye3142]

The constant plague of 2A infringement laws smacks more of ternary than adjudication. All firearms are firearms, therefor ARMS and thus protected by the second amendment. All government and officers of any and all courts and political positions should be expelled from office and be banned from further government positions, and also billed for all legal fees and court costs once they lose. Its all guns, all types, regardless of caliber, makes and models, and also all types body-armor that are 2A protected! Its all or none, and where none is not an option well then It would be evident to anyone with a better than a Forest Gump I.Q. that all gun laws are unconstitutional

[@barfo281]

...but you voted for anti-2A leftist Donnie Chump, didn't ya?

[@nicholasshultz2459]

Neitzsche? Seriously? Schadenfreude is real.

[@martyshannon7542]

😂😂😂😂❤❤❤❤❤ Love the Kermit the Frog : Lower your Voice.

[@wslrichards]

That was NOT a moment of zin!!! Now I've got to go take a 30-minute angry poop on the clock at work!

[@presidentmerkinmuffley6769]

To note it was a Felon, a Mister Pinner, who made the Indiana Supreme Court affirm that being armed does not degate your rights under the 4th. Being armed is not a grounds for a search, in Indiana, and should be the same nationwide.

[@tmutant]

I love you too, man.

[@barfo281]

It's not the '94 Brady Bill. It's the Brady/NRA Act. The National RINO Association has bragged that it would not have passed without them. "The NICS - set up by the permanent provisions of the Brady Act, which frankly should have been called the NRA Act - is run by the FBI and is constitutional because Congress has power to tell federal employees what to do. Congress also has power to offer financial assistance to the States to enable them to report criminal convictions, mental commitments, and other disabilities that render a person ineligible to obtain a firearm. The States’ ability to make these reports to federal authorities was enhanced by the NRA-supported NICS Improvements Act of 2007." - Stephen P. Halbrook, National RINO Association, Institute for Limp-wristed Acquiescence, 2018 Just a few things to unpack in that garbage by Halbrook: -NRA thinks Congress has the power to tell federal employees to violate the Constitution -NRA thinks Congress has the power to violate Constitution and give money to states in order for them to violate the Constitution -NRA thinks databases of people with lesser rights = constitutional. -NRA said the Brady Act was their idea and they want credit for it.

[@theJF7]

I'm a simple man. When I watch a video about pew related things and see a clip from Bolt, I like.

[@Jankyville]

I ain't livin with that shite in my neighborhood. Cameras that is.

[@nickg0411]

came for the brrrrrrt ....left with squirrel info ....oh and twice the brrrt

[@keredrellit3992]

Justice for peanut!

[@presidentmerkinmuffley6769]

Cheers for the brutal Nietzche meme @ 2:49

[@ARFCOMNews]

“Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you fall into an open sewer and die.” ― Mel Brooks

[@PresidentElectLeRoy]

I agree, if you are too much of a monster to own a gun your ass should not be free to walk among the humans.

[@scubasleeve3497]

I really don't care about Hunter lying on a 4473 or that he was pardoned for that. That should not be a crime for anyone because we should not have to fill out a form and get the king's permission to exercise a right. He has done so many other actual crimes which were far worse including participating in his dad's treason. That's what I'm pissed about him being pardoned for. Once felons have served their time they should have ALL rights restored, especially since there are so many things labeled "felonies" which are only violations of unconstitutional edicts.

[@ARFCOMNews]

I'm more upset about the crimes he got pardoned for that we don't even know about. Presidents should have to specifically detail the crime for the pardon to be considered valid. If you're getting away with it, we at least deserve to know what happened.

[@Jesses001]

I fully agree with your stance. If you served your time, the punishment is over. What point is it to make it so they can not have rights and have to do illegal things to make money? If your punishment is done, it is done. The question I have though, how many of us are there? I know many people think felons should not have rights. Has anyone done a good survey to determine how many people have our stance on that subject?

[@ARFCOMNews]

I think most of them just haven't really thought it through. As always, the Socratic method helps. Ask a question. "Why should dangerous people be released from prison?" The question isn't "Should felons have guns?" The real question is "Should we let people out if they can't be trusted with a gun?"

[@barfo281]

@Jesses001 Because most people who call themselves super duper pro2A aren't really pro2A at all. Talk to most of them for long enough, and they'll tell you what infringements they support, along with their Fuddy reasoning, which will usually include some SCROTUS garbage opinion that says 2A means "MAY be infringed," because those fake pro2A people do not understand the nature of rights, or the Constitution that allegedly protects them....which is why those fake pro2A people can/will never really defend those rights.

[@mathewfitzpatrick5645]

The entire first segment shows y'all didn't pay attention to the pardon. The crackhead got pardoned for everything that could be covered; for ELEVEN YEARS!

[@deucedeuce1572]

You let people out of prison that you don't think should be trusted with a gun, because not being trustworthy is not a crime. We have due process in this country and that means that once someone serves their sentence (which should be fair), that person is FREE!! We cannot keep them in prison longer than their sentence, because some person or other thinks they can't be trusted. There is no choice. Otherwise, we would only have tyranny. People would be thrown and kept in prison for one political reason or religious reason or another. Yeah, we should have tougher sentences a lot of the time, but still though... most people that go to prison will eventually get out, whether they can be trusted with a gun or not.

[@thomasboylan3751]

Another banger video, and hypocrite all you want. It's your American right!

[@Defective1]

That moment of zen was not zen at all, now I'm just more pissed about the government doing what it does

[@janliving4Him]

🎉

[@rosecitywrecker]

Al Gore rhythm

[@newguy2794]

Hang in there Patriots, America is coming back! In 47 days, America will be unburdened by what has been 🇺🇸

[@runlevelone]

Wtf my comments disappeared. YT or Channel deleting them?!

[@ARFCOMNews]

It does that a lot.

[@brucecook502]

Yep, KZbin likes to delete the comments we want to make but they leave our comments alone when we are just complaining about them deleting our comments.

[@BionicLemming]

Look into the Duarte case in the ninth circuit court of appeals. The court said that felons are still The People and unless a court deemed you to be a physical danger, you still have the right to own and bear. The Rahimi case concluded that physically dangerous individuals can be TEMPORARILY disarmed.

[@barfo281]

What you're saying is that SCROTUS said, in Rahimi, just like they said in Heller and Bruen, that the 2A says, "MAY be infringed." Hint: SCROTUS is wrong.

[@ihann1baL666]

Shall not be infringed good luck with that

[@Anamnesis010]

FREE DEXTER TAYLOR!

[@AlitaGunm99]

Most based yet!

[@lesspaul2241]

prayers for Matt Hoover

[@clinodev]

Sorry, Andrew, such hypocrisy is inexcusable. When I eventually catch up with you at a convention, I'm only buying you well drinks. Still love you too though!

[@beasthayabusa1999]

Simon whistler jumpscare wtf

[@waterhead1359]

Do you think a convicted felon should be able to legally buy a gun

[@joesashiify]

No. But they should have the option for restoration of rights for non-violent violations.

[@BionicLemming]

Yes.

[@brucecook502]

If the person doesn't have a long and recent criminal rap sheet of committing violence on others, then there's no good reason to say they shouldn't be trusted with a firearm. A person could be convicted of a felony for simply driving too fast. What does something like that have to do with trusting them with a firearm? There was a time when crimes were only considered felonies when they were the most egregious crimes a person could commit, nowadays you could catch a felony for spilling the milk(being hyperbolic).

[@opencarry3860]

Absolutely. If you are to dangerous to own a firearm in society due to a felony, then you are to dangerous to be released.

[@BionicLemming]

​@@joesashiify you mean privileges?

[@hikeskool]

Why do you guys (seemingly) always change the video thumbnail and title like an hour after posting? What am I missing? Thanks fam 👌

[@unkleskunky]

can there not be some pushback for frivilous legislating?

[@harborpatrol]

Andrew, I would argue that the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights only apply to U.S. citizens.

[@JimYeats]

His point - at least in this video - was that the individual should have their firearms taken away only after it was determined in court that they were in fact an illegal alien here illegally. His point being that any one of us could just be stripped of our rights because some partisan cop says he thought we were an “illegal immigrant”.

[@khester7397]

​@JimYeats Exactly. Or, maybe your ex-wife, a scumbag judge, and some dumb pigs think you need to be "red-flagged"

[@barfo281]

So....non citizens can be murdered or enslaved without fear of any penalties? You're a leftist. If you didn't know before, now you know.

[@ronaldjames8165]

illegal is not part of we the people

[@sickofpdx]

FREE MATTHEW HOOVER!!!

[@ragnarmjolnir9654]

Always fun😅

[@45auto]

That was a spicy (lower case s) moment of Zen.

[@ARFCOMNews]

It was also found by Spicy. So you'd be right in both senses.

[@mikequinn8780]

Careful about buying or making guns just to turn in at a buyback. You are likely to need an FFL since you are setting out to make a profit.

[@ARFCOMNews]

But they are "no questions asked". ;-)

[@evilberger1]

Let's Go Brandon...err The Big Guy!

[@heaviesculture5516]

Hunter plead guilty. His crimes are not alleged

[@barfo281]

non-crimes you mean

[@srobertson4035]

i ❤ commenting

[@Bob-cx4ze]

Is the New Life Delivery Chapel a "gun-free zone?" Sounds like entrapment.

[@justme_gb]

Does that stripped lower have a "bonus hole"?