6. Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis in SmartPLS-4 || Dr. Dhaval Maheta

#sem, #smartpls, #construct, #latent, #model, #cta, #confirmatory, #tetrad, #smartpls4
Email: [e-mail]
Twitter: / dhavalmaheta77
LinkedIn: / dhaval-maheta-320200153
Facebook ID: / dhaval.maheta.37
Telegram ID: t.me/DhavalMaheta

[@LasanthaWickremesooriya]

Excellent presentation. So clear the way you explained. Thank you so much!

[@tugbakirer]

Dear Sir, thanks for your video. how we decide to check p values or CI low CI up? sometimes p values are nor comply 80% rule but CI low CI up includes zero. because of that which one should I check?

[@user-bs7dt1rj9p]

Dear professor, I ran a CTA Analysis and found that 4 of 9 cases have p-value less than 0.05 meaning 44% of all combinations and lead to a formative model. Is this enough to say that the model has to be formative? I'm asking you because If I am looking at the CI low adj and CI up adj most of the correlations are -+ meaning that the model has to be reflective. Thank you very much!

[@SOP-nu4iu]

Dear Professor, can you please give us a reference for the 80% rule? I could not find any relevant sources within the current literature. Best regards.

[@micahangela1645]

Hello, SOP! I was wondering if you have found the reference for this? Thank you!

[@anitalow3628]

sir, what is your purpose to change organization commitment and staying intention from reflective to formative before running CTA? (5 minutes onward)

[@DhavalSaifaleeAaryash]

To run CTA, atleast one construct should be formative. It's a requirement of software

[@anitalow3628]

@@DhavalSaifaleeAaryash therefore, we have to purposely set any of the construct (with at least 4 indicators associated with it) into formatively-measured before running CTA?