(90)The Malachowski Class

[@Kitsula]

The Malachowski-class feels like Disco adaptation of the the old FASA RPG Anton Class which would be later refit into the Reliant/Miranda class. In fact the Anton now looks like a decent missing link between the Malachowski and Miranda.

[@DarthAzabrush]

Its actually incredible how much they went back to the old gaming material for the Disco classes. The Shepard class is taken directly from the old Starfleet Battles game.

[@NPSao]

One of the more beautiful ship designs I would've hoped to see more of.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

You and me both! :)

[@Christophsys]

Its such a great design. Simple, elegant and sturdy, just like the other ships of the era.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Indeed it is :)

[@colbyedinborough1917]

Holy moly. Just binged the entire truth or myth series over the past week, needless to say I know more about star trek now than my dad and I feel proud of that

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

LOL That is awesome, show up your dad ;) :P J/K Im honored to hear that though, thank you for the support :)

[@colbyedinborough1917]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios of course! These all feel like mini documentaries with insanely high production value. I'm really happy I found your channel!

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Thank you :) I try very hard to be high quality, so it's always great to hear compliments like that :)

[@DamienDrake2940]

The NX inspired saucer/nacelle format seems to be the perfect test platform when transitioning to a new era of design and technology standards. Simple, cost effective and quick to produce. From there Starfleet can easily edit the design with things like a secondary hull to fill different mission roles.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Couldn't agree more! :)

[@earlware4322]

It would be very interesting to see this ship with a secondary hull. Although I love it as is, especially the deflector array's design and location, the addition of a secondary hull (with a possible upgraded warp core/enginnering section) would look right at home. As well as complete the "missing link" in the design chain from the NX to the Constitution.

[@Voltaic_Fire]

This video is a bright spot in my day so far.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Awwww thank you :)

[@madtrucker3757]

Loved the video. Wish we could have seen more of the NX refit.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

You and I both... BUT there will be more videos about this ship in the future, so at least you'll see it here :)

[@demogorgonzola]

``the class would essentially be a saucer section`` - kinda fitting it bears the name of a discus throwing champion. :)

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

LOL this class was named after US Air Force pilot Nicole Malachowski, the first female member of the famed Thunderbirds acrobatic flying team. :P

[@demogorgonzola]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios Ah, so it's just a coincidence, a happy one though. :)

[@ussvoyager8650]

The Malachowski class is a really cool looking Starship

[@timjerrom7173]

Absolutely YES! Love the backstory adds depth to the other classes of ships.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Glad you enjoy them Tim :) Thanks for the continued support :)

[@timjerrom7173]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios dude what Trek fan would not like this?

[@ianbrewster8934]

It reminds of the Miranda class or the Reliant Class (as it was known back before they tightened up continuity)..... Great video again.....

[@DR_X69]

What great video. You never miss on these. Keep it up

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Glad you like them! Thank you John :)

[@kaidenshepard8446]

The Malachowski class is a lovable little ship from the Discovery era, one of which I like, and in STO a great ship to kit bash with the Miranda variants - probably the widesnt selection of any ship to mix and match in that particular game, as long as you have the ships of course to mix and match with. I like to have the tier 1 and tier 6 versions, the tier 6 always the kit bashed one as I am not keen on some of the things on the t6 version, especially the nacelles with those awful bussard collectors. Nevertheless, its a fun little ship, small, well armed a small powerhouse for its era. I would like to think that although the drain on ships systems with the shuttlebay forcecield, when shuttles return as well the forcefield would also probably act as a scrubber as well, to remove any external things that ay have got on to the hull of the shuttle and survived space flight to the ship, the forcefield removes any external threats tht may be on th ehull, if it is within its parameters of course - thats just my guess, or simply as you say, to keep the atmosphere in. It was really nice as well to hear a it of backstory to the Malachowski's shakedown/first assignment on scanning that region of space that had been unscanned for 30 years, that was also a nice twist and not everything is bubbly happiness and triumph at the last secind, was really fune nonetheless to hear. This is why your videos with beta canon are awesome, you add that sprinkle of space dust and create it your own and it works mighty fine. Proud of you, keep up the fantastic work you do. Peace and long life.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Thank you Kaiden :) And yes, sometimes I pull myself back from having darker twists, as fandom can get nitpicky about the non bubbly future type Trek stories... But when I can I slip them in to remind people about a) How dangerous space truly is and b) How often times in Trek there are a LOT of deaths and destruction in series like TOS :P

[@dominik8005]

Thanky you very nice Truth OR Myth BETA- The Malachowski Class

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

You're very welcome :)

[@philly83]

Like many fans, I didn't think much of the designs from discovery but I have warmed up a little to some of them including this class.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Some I loved, like the Nimitz and Cardenas Classes, Some I disliked, like the Magee and this Class.... But with time, even they have grown to the "they are ok" Classes for me :)

[@philly83]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios the Nimitz class is the one that I've grown to really like.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

I actually loved it from the start... Even bought the Eaglemoss model :) Now just have to work on getting the model for Space Engine so I can refresh the video Ive already made on it ;)

[@commiecomrade2644]

Hello mr. tri guy. Thanks for making another video!

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

LOL you are very welcome Mr Eaton Guy :P

[@dennisdean7366]

The Malachowski class starship's spaceframe is a sturdy design.

[@dennisud]

Great storytelling!

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Thanks Doug!

[@sivaschuh4396]

I enjoyed the story of the Malachowski class. Keep up the great work!

[@troyspencer753]

I love the narrative. The ship is cool, but not sleek or elegant. But overall a fantastic video! Thank you for this!

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

You're very welcome Troy :)

[@miner1611]

Man I love these videos. All the videos that I watch with this format go into my head Cannon.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Thank you Jaycewan :)

[@EliteValor1003]

This being my first ship in the first star trek game I've ever taken the helm of, I'm extremely in love with this ship and have a heavy bias towards the class. I used the ship well past the recommended use and with lots of luck, increasingly sweaty play style and lots of sinking managed to use it all the way up to the dyson sphere battles. But with the release of the Clarke Command Cruiser I play as my Malachowski class light cruiser cosmetically and spiritually.

[@davidporter9147]

Thank you for creating wonderful and engaging content. The backstory is truly creative.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Glad you enjoy it David! :)

[@ptah956]

I'm looking forward to your Magee Class video. If anyone can make that class make any kind of sense, it's you.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

I WILL be doing one on it at some point in the future, and I LOVE a challenge ;)

[@swilliams1000]

excellent story and ship

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Thank you so much :)

[@williamsquires3070]

It’s vaguely reminiscent of the original Romulan Bird-of-prey (ST:TOS “Balance of Terror”, I believe). I wonder if the Romulans tried to sue for patent infringement? 🤣

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

No worries, Starfleet Command has it's Legal Eagle at the ready, should the Romulans try to take advantage of the situation ;)

[@milesmayhem5440]

I agree. It is so much like the Mark I Romulan War Bird. A Federation/Romulan legal drama might actually be an interesting concept.

[@DarthAzabrush]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios All of the best lawyers in the Galaxy are Tellarites. Sorted.

[@robertwhatley9861]

Looks like a cross between the Miranda and old romulan war bird. But a solid ship.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Indeed it does! :)

[@mattwilson8298]

I just love videos like these. I really get into Star Trek but I don't necessarily have the time or the resources (or the will) to dig into the beta canon depths and pull up gems like this. Never heard of this ship before, tho intuitively I knew it must exist. The well integrated Federation we see in the shows and movies had to be built at some point. And this to me is a fascinating look into Starfleet history that I may never have found on my own. Big thanks Triangulum. I also really dig your narrative abilities. In fact, were you ever to write your own sci-fi story I may just be compelled to read it.👽

[@dameionwilson9359]

Interesting class

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Indeed it is :)

[@wolfmeadows]

I like the look of the Malachowski class. But on Star Trek online. I'm always switching it out for the Walker class

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

LOL

[@brockjacobs6404]

Personally I've challenged myself to see if I could fly the malachowski effectively all the way through the story. I always end up losing at about the borg section

[@frankb3347]

One of the only Discoverse ships that I don't hate. Probably because it's one of the only ones that isn't completely off scale and out of place.

[@chrispitchforth621]

I love these videos. Would love to hear you do some "what if" episodes.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Like what? Have any ideas? :)

[@chrispitchforth621]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios Like what if Scotty had helped build the NX01. Or what if the Klingons had found earth first.

[@BELCAN57]

We need a follow up on the derelict Andorian ship.

[@kennyhagan5781]

It actually looks a bit intimidating, reminiscent of the Romulan War Birds from TOS. I think that it is a design that they should have stuck with, small, low profile, and maneuverable. I will take one to convert into a luxury yacht, who do I need to talk to?

[@LMG1792]

Another great video. Are you going to work through the federation ship recognition Manuel ships from fasa? There are ALOT of sweet ships in that book as I’m sure you already know.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

I intend to do EVERY starship I possibly can ;)

[@bobpuppet]

Great video as always. At the beginning you talk about how the early Starfleet had to rely on older designs like the NX class. It seems all of the Earth Starfleet was integrated into the Federation Starfleet. I wonder how much of the member worlds' fleets were directly integrated into Starfleet? Where there Vulcan or Andorran ships serving in Starfleet? Did they have an NCC designation? Would that account for the Malachowski's high NCC number?

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Well Registry Numbers can never be used to determine a starships age... They actually seem to be relatively arbitrary in reality as Trek has shown us... IE the Constellation from TOS being 1017 even though the Enterprise that came before her is 1701, or the Grissom from ST3 with a Reg of 638, when she CLEARLY came after the Constitution, Crossfield Class etc.... As to whether there were other Member World starships in Starfleet? I'd like to think their were at first, as that makes sense... BUT unfortunately, we dont really have an answer that... At least not yet...

[@merrick1588]

And stuff like this is why the captain ISN'T supposed to go on away missions!

[@Justice107]

Do a video on the Ark Royal class starship. I'd love to watch a video of what you can come up with.

[@xaraxen]

The bronze-and-amber color scheme is a nod to the USS Discovery.

[@JEDAI501ST]

You mean the Mike Wazowski class!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Ae13UPrime]

Was never too sure about putting shuttle bays between impulse engines. If they are on while docking or launching vessels, the turbulence would probably be significant.

[@riccardogemme]

Not great looking, but not bad looking either. Can see its lineage in future designs.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Indeed you can :)

[@daviddyster4145]

I know the Malachowski class is not your favorite ship of the line, but at least your giving it a chance. Question: I did you play the Age of Discovery story arc from Star Trek Online?

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

I dont dislike it, it's just an average looking design really for me... It's grown on me though as of late :) And I give ALL starships a fair chance ;) And yes I did!

[@daviddyster4145]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios And what did you think of it?

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

It was ok, why do you ask?

[@subgum3403]

Daedelus rulez!

[@daviddyster4145]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios I was wondering?

[@Catperson84]

This ship looks like a beef up NX class

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Not really... I dont see it...

[@Catperson84]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios That's what i got out of it.

[@wyattdoran2480]

Are you going to do a Engle class from dsc just wondering it’s a cool looking ship class and your video make ever ship seam real and even more fantastic than any tv show could do so I’m hope it maybe a yes just because knowing your videos it would be Fantastic keep up the good work

[@dsc4178]

Not bad

[@schoon3303]

It’s a more realistically believable ship that everything else that’s been out.

[@PhilDrury]

Starfleet has an annoying habit of scrapping ship designs before their time with rare exceptions.

[@stevenwells157]

👍👍👍🖖

[@1COMIXMAN]

So let me get the I straight. We go from smooth hulled designs to stuff like the franklin,enterprise and then the stuff from early discovery then back to smooth hulled designs. Then into the late tnt era designs start to look more like military ships again instead of smooth hulled explorers.Yes I do,like some of the ships from discovery. But they look more futuristic for their timelines.their styles could fit in with more modern star trek ships if they had new refits. Imagine a walako2ski with modern phaser strips and 2 fore 1 aft torpedo launchers. Reminds me of a Miranda without the rollbar.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

No they dont, and they really follow the historical patterns of designs, with history repeating itself, and technological development changing an overall design! IE, Nacelles, NX Era- Cylinder, DSC Era- Box, TOS Era, Cylinder Again, TMP Era Box again, TNG Era Cylinder, PIC Era Box... and so on, so forth! Having been making these videos for a long time now, I 100%, with everything I am say, you're incorrect with this personal opinion of yours. DSC Era Starships are clearly older, yet more advanced then the NX Era starship design...

[@1COMIXMAN]

Those nacelles look straight out of picard.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

No they don't, not even close!

[@craigmarshall3386]

Wow, no interior design shots? Would like to have seen a bridge shot or hallway. Interesting video

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Where exactly would you like me to get interior shots of a ship that has never shown it's interior on screen?

[@craigmarshall3386]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios I hear you.

[@trekicb]

In my opinion all of DISCO is no prime time Line. It's a seperate alternative timline. This have his start out of the temporal could war. Because there were a lot of technical break outs because it is all to modern for the pre TOS time.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

The Star Trek Timeline isnt a matter of opinion though, it's a matter of fact... The owners of Trek say it's the Prime Timeline, then it IS the Prime Timeline the end! Your comment would be like saying, "In my opinion, water isn't wet." Well you can say that all you want but the truth that water is in fact wet doesnt change and it just means you're wrong!

[@trekicb]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios Yes, but this does not clear wy all is so in consistent and me says it the producers don't understand ST. And the real canon is not from interesst for them. "NEW-TREK" is a hide reeboot wich is not named do. It is a real kick to all fans who look for consistenze in all.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Star Trek has always been inconsistent to be honest... And I think a visual update was most definitely needed in order to keep Trek current... They've done it with EVERY series, so to go and cry about it is kind of silly... Canon is more about events rather then the physical looks of something... IE, we get the word canon from the Bible, and you dont see in the various illustrated versions Christians complaining that thats not what the angels looked like in the last older version of the Bible! This channel, IS dedicated to Canon, but has no problem accepting that the owners of Trek have declared that New Trek is the Prime Timeline and that as a result of Trek being made now a days, has an updated look. Claims of "not real canon, or real Star Trek" have NO place here, as you're just wrong about that.. Please refer to the Channel Rules in the Channel Intro video at time code 1:03 kzbin.info/www/bejne/nGesfJx4dtmSmKc to ensure you dont go over the line and end up banned... Other then a new visual style, New Trek does NOT break canon any more then old Trek does... Ive done many videos on this channel which already prove that, so you really dont have a leg to stand on there either. Point is, It IS Prime and whether you like it or not, that's not going to change, so you need to learn to live with it... Just like Water is wet, and the Earth is not flat... The way I view the episodes to not make me go insane picking apart every thing that looks different from series to series, is to view them as a re-enactment, rather then actual footage of actual events. In fact this way, certain things make even more sense... Like how Kirk can make a log entry in the middle of a battle while his lips are not moving... And then visual changes are meaningless! Like Gene Roddenberry said when asked at a convention shortly after the release of TMP about why the Klingons looked so different, "Changes? What do mean Changes? There's no changes, that was simply how they always looked, just you couldnt see it before!" And if that explanation is good enough for Gene, it's good enough for you :)

[@trekicb]

@@TriAngulumAudioStudios Ok. Your view on it is ok. But my view allso. And your beta storrys are allways fix the holes very good. A new universe story have had be a better solution like this now. But its ok.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

You are of course entitled to dislike anything you want... But any comments like " DISCO is no prime time Line. It's a seperate alternative timline" are simply incorrect... As that is a matter of fact, not opinion... And you have no authority to dictate what is or isnt Prime!

[@lordeldauoud142]

“ Ship “ “ Seems “ “ A “ “ Bit “ “ Weak “ “ To “ “ Me “

[@ROA_Offical]

Can you plz do a video likes this on the 23rd century Sheppard class and the 22nd century Poseidon class?

[@neves5083]

where do these ship models come from? are mods for star trek online?

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Space Engine

[@dumbestoyster]

The Mike Wozowski class

[@franksmedley8619]

Hello TAS. I hate to mention this but you mis-spoke in the video. It should not have been 'desperate'... but instead, Dis-par-tate'. Desperate and Dis par tate, even though spelled the same, mean different things.

[@TriAngulumAudioStudios]

Hello Frank. First, I did say Disparate , it's merely my Canadian and Portuguese accent that sometimes gets in the way... Second, this channel does not require anyone's services as Pronunciation Police... This goes against channel rules as we have MANY people, from MANY areas of the world were accents, spellings, education etc can play a part in how things are said and pronounced etc... Also, no ones perfect. So if you cant handle listening to the occasional flub, or a different pronunciation of something then that you're used to, this channel is not for you!