At 2:54, processes are *NOT* light-weight when compared to threads, instead threads are lightweight when compared to processes. Actors are generally more light-weight when compared to threads though.
@sprobertson7 ай бұрын
I assume it was specifically about erlang/beam processes (a lot of what was said about processes only makes sense in that context)
@yaseengousesamudri93907 ай бұрын
@@sprobertson yeah, it makes sense then
@AdamSchelenbergCom2 ай бұрын
@@sprobertson Confirm, BEAM processes are lightweight (so lightweight in fact that ... don't know how to finish this, but really lightweight).
@rahulkulkarni17802 жыл бұрын
Wonderful explanation! Pushing process/state to the end clients is an interesting idea! Looking forward to learn more about these ideas…
@branmuller Жыл бұрын
This video is fantastic, underrated channel wow
@JGBSolutions3 жыл бұрын
Dude I knew you were going to mention Elixir and Erlang but your stuff is good. Really good. I subscribed.
@linz421310 ай бұрын
Fantastic introducing important concept, not mentioning language superiority (OTP rocks BTW)
@GubenkovED Жыл бұрын
Wonderful presentation! Can you please share the tools you used for the animations?
@yehudamakarov8 ай бұрын
lol this content is stellar well done
@rishabh_gour3 жыл бұрын
2:54 - "processes are lightweight when compared to threads". Isn't it the otherway around?
@JGBSolutions3 жыл бұрын
No, processes are indeed lightweight. The BEAM (elixir, erlang) controls them as far as I understood them.
@Mekhami3 жыл бұрын
elixir processes, not system processes.
@rishabh_gour3 жыл бұрын
@@Mekhami that makes sense now, thanks
@knowthen3 жыл бұрын
I'm referring to processes in the actor model,. Are you thinking of system processes? I can see how that might be confusing.
@Mekhami3 жыл бұрын
@@knowthen i don't particularly like how you're sort of implying the actor model is specific to the BEAM, when of course it isn't. This video seems to be more "actor model in the context of beam" than about the actor model specifically, which explains why, to me, it's missing some of the key concepts behind the actor model.
@siyaram28553 жыл бұрын
Please come back James! The world needs you. There is no one like you. People need to know about this, you are the only on who can pull this out. Please make more videos on Elixir/Phoenix. You can make subscription based screencast website.
@AdamSchelenbergCom2 ай бұрын
He had a website where you could Elm/Elixir/JS courses. And you know what? I revisited today and all the courses are free? I mean that's amazing. I wish I could donate cause it's a lot of value! So James, if you read this first of all thank you and second create a donation button on the website (maybe just for experimentation sake).
@MMABeijing2 жыл бұрын
first time viewer. liked the video, subbed to channel. Amazing explanation, what a teacher you are, and great visual as well. May I ask what tool you use to make that type of presentation?
@siyaram28553 жыл бұрын
James, don't you think kubernetes solvs the same purpose? Why someone would learn erlang/elixir when you can fo sane things with Go and kubernetes?
@ihsanpro94062 жыл бұрын
This saves more cost and better concurrency because you can run millions of process within a single pod inside kubernetes