Very well explained and equally demonstrated! Thank you very much!
@pathologyhub94243 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing. Please keep posting
@hamidohimo13 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for the excellent lecture... top standard lecture as usual from you, Prof. Shah. I appreciate the precious time and expertise put into these lectures...
@rajalbshahExperturologicpath3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Mohamed!
@Simon-si3ec2 жыл бұрын
Excellent, I am ready for signout tomorrow in GU!
@rajalbshahExperturologicpath2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Simon! I am glad that you are finding these lectures practical and useful! Please check out all and share with your colleagues!
@MW-we2rd3 жыл бұрын
Excellent. Thank you Dr. Shah
@rajalbshahExperturologicpath2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for liking
@SandhyaRamachandran3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr.Shah, much needed ! Can u please clarify the foll.point ..CAP says.."Seminal vesicle involvement is defined as a tumor invasion of the muscular wall of seminal vesicle..Only extraprostatic seminal vesicle invasion is included in the definition of seminal vesicle involvement.." At 22:05, Ty I invasion along ejaculatory ducts into SV wall.. would that be pT3b? Thanks in advance.
@rajalbshahExperturologicpath3 жыл бұрын
Ejaculatory duct could be a route for inversion into seminal vesicle. Importantly you need invasion into the extra prosthetic portion of the seminal vesicle to qualify for the seminal vesicle invasion. If you see invasion of only ejaculatory duct, that would be still pT2
@rajalbshahExperturologicpath3 жыл бұрын
Some people consider ejaculatory duct as a intraprostatic portion of seminal vesicle, however for staging you do need invasion of the extra prosthetic portion of the seminal vesicle. I hope this is clear to you
@SandhyaRamachandran3 жыл бұрын
@@rajalbshahExperturologicpath Yes, thank you. So, whether invasion of extraprostatic SV wall is from within or without, its SV invasion!
@tinocasadeitherezo60633 жыл бұрын
Just one question: isn't an iatrogenic margin a real one???!!
@rajalbshahExperturologicpath3 жыл бұрын
Good question, Tino! I would consider iatrogenic margin as a real one as it has been created by the surgeon by cutting through the prostate. I report it as a positive but I do describe further in the comment