A.I., What is Too Much?!

Instagram: www.instagram....
website: www.studio12online.com
Get started on Shutterstock: submit.shutter...

[@Sebastian-lw1ei]

Very interesting perspective. Art is art as long as the artist made it. Most people don’t ask the artist how it was made, and I agree as long as you took the “components” to make the composite, and used various tools 🛠️ to create the composition (whether it’s color sliders or AI object removal) I believe it’s all good. I think the artist should disclose the general technique used (composite photo, plaster sculpture, oil painting on wood) it’s perfectly fine. I think high-level disclosure is important. If not-artists generated components were added (AI or otherwise) that should somehow be disclosed too. If most of the art is prompt AI generated (e.g. create XYZ or create XYZ based on this photo) I think it should be called something like “human inspired - AI generated art” Thank you very much for this video. It’s very timely on topic and I’m sure we’ll settle on some kind of disclosure naming conventions for the various degrees of AI Generated or AI assisted art.

[@Todd_Kuhns]

Thanks for the comment and for watching. I appreciate your insight.

[@scottgray4877]

I have no problem with it. Nice job! I appreciate your ethic of using only your own photos for the new composition. I don’t think you need to identify it as a composite. You are presenting an image, not a recipe.

[@Todd_Kuhns]

Thanks for the input and for watching!

[@robinstone564]

Got strong feelings about this subject, but not sure a KZbin video comment section is the best place to express them. Todd that’s two videos in a row where you got to me. 😁

[@Todd_Kuhns]

So, am I doing something right or something wrong with these videos? Ha, didn't mean to fire you up. Next video, "How to photography cute puppies."

[@robinstone564]

@@Todd_Kuhns your doing good. If you do cute puppies I’m unsubscribing 🤣

[@Todd_Kuhns]

@@robinstone564 Haha, that comment made my morning!