A QUICK review of the OLDEST Greek manuscript to contain 1 John 5:7.

  Рет қаралды 1,014

Dwayne Green

Dwayne Green

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 29
@jytogatewood
@jytogatewood 17 күн бұрын
oh weird, I just went over this at my bible college earlier to-day, I don't know how I missed this video from you before just now.
@JohnMiles117
@JohnMiles117 28 күн бұрын
Fantastic! You answered a ton of questions that I had.
@EmmanuelObbo-u8x
@EmmanuelObbo-u8x Ай бұрын
Me I have loved your dark purple shirt that you decided to put on throughtout this war regarding 1John 5:7 (Johanine Comma). Anyway, thank you for the effort. Indeed that's the most controversial verse in the New Testament.
@joseramonperez9609
@joseramonperez9609 24 күн бұрын
The passage was quoted by *_Cyprian 210-258 A.D._*
@fanman8102
@fanman8102 27 күн бұрын
Here’s my confusion. Why do people translate from the Latin to the Greek? So we’re basing the Greek translation off of a Latin translation of an earlier Greek version? Seems to me the Greek version should be copied from the earliest Greek versions we have. What’s the point of making a Greek version of the Vulgate or a Greek version of the AKJV? Kinda backwards isn’t it?
@bobbymichaels2
@bobbymichaels2 Ай бұрын
It's in the original that we no longer have.
@roddumlauf9241
@roddumlauf9241 Ай бұрын
Bobby, what evident do you have for your claim that it is in the original that we no longer have ? If it was in the original, why don't we have evident for the "original", that the first readers of John's letters read that verse in John's Epistles ? We have tons of their writings, defending the tri-ad being of God, but we never never see the Early Church Fathers using 1 John 5:7 to defend their doctrine that God is a Trinity. Can you answer why the Christians who did read the originals never used this verse to combat the Gnostics ?
@fanman8102
@fanman8102 27 күн бұрын
That’s what I love about the argument, I watch it for entertainment! Case in point, your comment. So I gotta know. Are you serious or just jerking this guy’s chain? At first I started laughing then I thought, what if he’s serious? LOL!
@joseramonperez9609
@joseramonperez9609 24 күн бұрын
There is evidence that the *_Arians_* from the city of *_Alexandria_* removed the passage from the early Manuscripts since a lot of the Father of the early Church made mention or quotation from parts or almost the complete passage, even very ancient *_translations in other languages_* have the passage. The problem is that there is a *_real interest and effort_* from the *_enemy_* trying to use heretics people like them, and also nowadays using the *_Critical Text modern translations and translators_* trying to *_remove_* the verses and passages referring to *_Christ's divinity, Holy Spirit's gifts like speaking in tongues_* verses rendering like: *_"translation of tongues" instead of "interpretation of tongues" as indeed the _*Greek_* says and NOT as the *_LSB_* bible translation assumes. These are just some examples of what the *_enemy_* has been trying to do in his effort for *_"removing"_* verses and passages as he did using the *_Arians_* in the past, and nowadays using the *_Critical Text modern bible translations and translators._*
@kainech
@kainech 22 күн бұрын
In answer to who AW is, it's a guy who produced a nice, cheap root beer. If anyone doubts me or questions me on this my root beer floats speak against it.
@Dwayne_Green
@Dwayne_Green 22 күн бұрын
😂😂😂
@rodneyjackson6181
@rodneyjackson6181 Ай бұрын
How old is the manuscript brother? I am watching the video piece meal.
@Dwayne_Green
@Dwayne_Green Ай бұрын
14th century
@rodneyjackson6181
@rodneyjackson6181 Ай бұрын
@Dwayne_Green very late!
@richardrolf5496
@richardrolf5496 Ай бұрын
The oldest manuscript of the New Testament is the Original Ancient Byzantine Koine Greek Text at 320 to 3:25 AD
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 29 күн бұрын
And that is completely missing the Johanine comma (along with the entire verse). As he said - this is the earliest Greek text with it in (and quite probably a back translation from the Latin).
@richardrolf5496
@richardrolf5496 Ай бұрын
1st John
@AlanHales-k6i
@AlanHales-k6i Ай бұрын
Dwayne Green there's enough historical information and evidence that proves you wrong. Without v7, the Greek grammar in vs 6 & 8 would be wrong. Why do you let the devil use you to spread his lies.
@GizmoFromPizmo
@GizmoFromPizmo 29 күн бұрын
1 John 5:7 may not be scripture but it is canon. James 2:21 is scripture but it breaks canon.
@richardrolf5496
@richardrolf5496 Ай бұрын
1st John chapter 5 verse 7 is in the oldest Original Byzantine Koine Greek Text of the New Testament
@pierreabbat6157
@pierreabbat6157 29 күн бұрын
The Majority Text edition, which is the book on his shelf that says "THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT" in white on a blue background with white above it, says "Οτι τρεις εισιν οι μαρτυρουντες", and the rest of the verse is in a footnote, with the only witness being the TR. It's not in the many old manuscripts that the edition is based on.
@biblestudies9391
@biblestudies9391 19 күн бұрын
Hey Dwayne. I recently uploaded a recording about some major problems I have with modern textual criticism. I don’t allow comments on my videos but if you ever get five minutes to listen and respond I’d greatly appreciate it. If you do listen and reply on this comment it’d be much appreciated
@thevulture5750
@thevulture5750 Ай бұрын
Have you seen how the KJV Bible has a complex mathematical structure?
@Dwayne_Green
@Dwayne_Green Ай бұрын
So does Moby Dick!
@thevulture5750
@thevulture5750 Ай бұрын
@Dwayne_Green if you convert the word Lord into numbers and take the square root you get the Fibonacci sequence opening... Lord 12 15 18 4 √1215184 is 1102.35 1,1,2,3,5...
@GizmoFromPizmo
@GizmoFromPizmo 29 күн бұрын
2 John 7 - For many deceivers have entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. So, from a doctrinal standpoint, 1 John 4:3 is legit, even though the text is not there in some manuscripts. Catholicism teaches that Jesus did not "come in the flesh" but instead was beamed into our reality. Read the _Infancy Gospel of James_ and see that, according to Marian doctrine (Perpetual Virginity) Jesus could not have been born in the ordinary way but was instead born as a spirit. Jesus came not by water and blood but as a spirit, according to mainstream Catholicism.
@munbruk
@munbruk Ай бұрын
People think of the word of God as equal to Jesus, and that is wrong. No problem with the verse if teh word of God means just that ie the word of God. The verse did not mention Jesus.
@georgehilario3544
@georgehilario3544 Ай бұрын
John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth
@munbruk
@munbruk 29 күн бұрын
@@georgehilario3544 Yes Jesus was created by the word of God like any creature. also see that word became FLESH, not Jesus. that is the creation.
Let's LOOK at 1 John 5:7 in the OLDEST Greek manuscript?
1:44:45
Dwayne Green
Рет қаралды 1,9 М.
Гениальное изобретение из обычного стаканчика!
00:31
Лютая физика | Олимпиадная физика
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН
So Cute 🥰 who is better?
00:15
dednahype
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
黑天使只对C罗有感觉#short #angel #clown
00:39
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
Что-что Мурсдей говорит? 💭 #симбочка #симба #мурсдей
00:19
Footnotes in the NKJV and the GODLY men who worked on it #NKJVbible
23:44
The New THOMPSON CHAIN-REFERENCE STUDY BIBLE by Zondervan!
2:53
Christ the King Apostolic Church
Рет қаралды 402
Can the Church Fathers and Evangelicalism Mix?
15:45
Gospel Simplicity
Рет қаралды 33 М.
🧾 Codex VATICANUS and NEW research about the DISTIGMAI!
18:13
Who Wrote the Gospels?
23:48
UsefulCharts
Рет қаралды 519 М.
The Biggest HEIST of New Testament manuscripts EVER!
22:33
Dwayne Green
Рет қаралды 702
Гениальное изобретение из обычного стаканчика!
00:31
Лютая физика | Олимпиадная физика
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН