A revisit to the set of fours with proof

[@p34573]

Thanks for taking the time and effort to show this. I, for one, really appreciate all that you have posted.

[@perryfire3006]

Thanks. I enjoy making the videos so it's a win for both of us. Cheers

[@WahrheitMachtFrei.]

"Pulleys are goood, m'kay?"

[@perryfire3006]

They are cool. Thanks for watching.

[@gregdoubek238]

Thanks for your response! I'm sorry I sent you down a rabbit hole where you had to buy a POS tensiometer........... I know we are splitting hairs. Thanks for your contributions in spreading awareness of mechanical advantage systems!

[@perryfire3006]

Thank you for the respectful dialogue. As far as the scale is concerned, it is going back to Amazon for a refund, so no worries. It is amazing a 100 year old scale performed better than a new digitized one, although hard to read. Cheers

[@zoobiewa]

How would you calculate the force advantage if pulling rope that attaches to itself and is tying tension around an object. For, say, a treenet, you attach pulleys to prusiks to both ends of a rope and pull them towards one another in order to lock that tension in with a knot. This means that both sides are loads and anchors at the same time?

[@perryfire3006]

Not quite sure what you are asking without sketching it out. I've never done a tree net so I am unfamiliar with what you are describing.

[@dunnkruger8825]

ALAS! My apologies- didn’t wait for the test #3 b 4 reacting THANKS

[@perryfire3006]

No worries, thanks for watching!

[@dunnkruger8825]

Thanks. But formulas are tested with measurements e.g., The scientific method proof is demo with a scale attached around the load