A Simple PROOF that Mohammad is a Fake Prophet

[@KyleSurette13]

Jesus warned about Mohammed. He said take heed, false prophets would arise and decieve many

[@troybyrne2916]

Muslims are correct Muhammad is in the bible just not in the way they want him to be... false prophet for sure

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& unitarian christians/jews of past whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts: Lion: Babylon. Bear: Persia. Leopard: Greece. Beast: Rome. Little horn is hadrian. Eastern & western rome are iron & clay. Stone was set between its division & end. God's saints: They'll hit the feet & take away little horn's dominion (4th kingdom) to end it. Muslims ended it by ending byzantine so they're the saints. Dominion over all will be in future under Messiah (son of man was seen after beast died) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn gaining power over believers & his kingdom's end is "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & conquest of byzantine was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom, rather He gives it. Saying son of man is God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach is a deductive fallacy. These are also in the dream part (not the explanation part), so not completely literal. "Worship him" is a mistranslation & targums prove pelach is aramaic of abad (service or reverence) either to God (worship) or to men (not worship). No reason to chose the formar. And we revere Jesus & will accept him as the leader. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline) Abomination: 1290 yamim timer starts the day there's both abomination & absense of valid sacrifice. It isn't 167bc/70 as nothing happened 1290 yamim after them. Nor the antichrist because other "elect deceiver" antichrists (plural) will come between it & him. Jesus didn't return in his generation but the below came true so its genuine. Matthew said, when abomination stands in holy place, Judeans must flee for a tribulation & false Messiahs (plural) deceiving the elect will come. True prophets can also come as John noted. 132's war in Judea leading to exile fits. Bar kokhba deceived the elect (akiva). False Messiahs & tribulation will continue until Messiah, not just during antichrist. Daniel's time of distress spans post greece to pre resurrection day (eternal contempt doesn't fit 33). Abomination of "desolation" is bar kokhba whose high priest was in charge of desolate holy place in 132 or idols put by romans but the year is unclear due to cassius not writing it (129/130/131/132/135). Hadrian's idol is an opinion of Jerome (ref: commentary on matthew). 1290 years passed between 132 & 1422 when ottomans laid previous seige to constantinople but lifted it. It succeeded in 1453 (1335 years after hadrian's rise). End of 1335 yamim isn't the hour as only God knows it, rather it's the start of end phrase with the 4th beast's end. An annointed (not "the" annointed implying a different one) was ended & had nothing after (not at the end of) 69 weeks during temple destruction. So it's the last annointed high priest as he was unalived during this time & left no legacy (had nothing) unlike Jesus who ascended.

[@cowdyimammurrahtabari973]

Muslims (& past unitarian christians/jews whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts (kingdoms): 1. Lion: Babylon. 2. Bear: Medo persia. 3. Leopard: Greece. 4. Beast: Rome. Little horn might be hadrian. Rome divided into eastern & western (iron & clay). 5. God's saints: They're daniel 2's stone who ended the feet/beast (little horn's dominion/kingdom). Muslims ended it by ending eastern so they're saints. Dominion over all will be during Messiah (son of man was seen after beast's end) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn's rise & beast's end would be "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & muslim conquest of eastern rome was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom. Saying he's God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach in the symbolic dream (not explanation) part is a fallacy. Worship is a mistranslation & pelach means abad (ref: targums), i.e., serving/revering God (worship) or men (not worship). We revere Jesus. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline) Abomination: 1290 yamim timer starts the day there's both abomination & absense of valid sacrifice. It isn't 167bc/70 as nothing happened 1290 yamim after them. Nor the antichrist because other "elect deceiver" antichrists (plural) will come between it & him. Jesus didn't return in his generation but the below came true so its genuine. Matthew said, when abomination stands in holy place, Judeans must flee for a tribulation & false Messiahs (plural) deceiving the elect will come. True prophets can also come as John noted. 132's war in Judea leading to exile fits. Bar kokhba deceived the elect (akiva). False Messiahs & tribulation will continue until Messiah, not just during antichrist. Daniel's time of distress spans post greece to pre resurrection day (eternal contempt doesn't fit 33). Abomination of "desolation" is bar kokhba whose high priest was in charge of desolate holy place in 132 or idols put by romans but the year is unclear due to cassius not writing it (129/130/131/132/135). Hadrian's idol is an opinion of Jerome (ref: commentary on matthew). 1290 years passed between 132 & 1422 when ottomans laid previous seige to constantinople but lifted it. It succeeded in 1453 (1335 years after hadrian's rise). End of 1335 yamim isn't the hour as only God knows it, rather it's the start of end phrase with the 4th beast's end.

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& past unitarian christians/jews whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts (kingdoms): 1. Lion: Babylon. 2. Bear: Medo persia. 3. Leopard: Greece. 4. Beast: Rome. Little horn might be hadrian. Rome divided into eastern & western (iron & clay). 5. God's saints: They're daniel 2's stone who ended the feet/beast (little horn's dominion/kingdom). Muslims ended it by ending eastern so they're saints. Dominion over all will be during Messiah (son of man was seen after beast's end) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn's rise & beast's end would be "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & muslim conquest of eastern rome was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom. Saying he's God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach in the symbolic dream (not explanation) part is a fallacy. Worship is a mistranslation & pelach means abad (ref: targums), i.e., serving/revering God (worship) or men (not worship). We revere Jesus. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline) Abomination: 1290 yamim timer starts the day there's both abomination & absense of valid sacrifice. It isn't 167bc/70 as nothing happened 1290 yamim after them. Nor the antichrist because other "elect deceiver" antichrists (plural) will come between it & him. Jesus didn't return in his generation but the below came true so its genuine. Matthew said, when abomination stands in holy place, Judeans must flee for a tribulation & false Messiahs (plural) deceiving the elect will come. True prophets can also come as John noted. 132's war in Judea leading to exile fits. Bar kokhba deceived the elect (akiva). False Messiahs & tribulation will continue until Messiah, not just during antichrist. Daniel's time of distress spans post greece to pre resurrection day (eternal contempt doesn't fit 33). Abomination of "desolation" is bar kokhba whose high priest was in charge of desolate holy place in 132 or idols put by romans but the year is unclear due to cassius not writing it (129/130/131/132/135). Hadrian's idol is an opinion of Jerome (ref: commentary on matthew). 1290 years passed between 132 & 1422 when ottomans laid previous seige to constantinople but lifted it. It succeeded in 1453 (1335 years after hadrian's rise). End of 1335 yamim isn't the hour as only God knows it, rather it's the start of end phrase with the 4th beast's end.

[@skakvac]

Muhammad mentioned in bible by name kzbin.info/www/bejne/baWVdX-Ba5yLrpo

[@libertasinveritas3198]

Islam and Mormonism were always incredibly easy to debunk. I truly have difficulty understanding how anyone could fall for it. EDIT: : Muhammed thought himself possessed by the devil and it was his first wife Khadija - she was basically his older sugar mommy and a SALES WOMAN - convinced him it was an angel... She was his boss, his wife, his SALESWOMAN

[@lildrill]

islam prospers because people are forced to join and dumbed down from birth. Like the bible says raise a child that way they will stay in it forever. Sadly they will never question it also because muslim countries kill people for it

[@MohseenLala]

And christanity isn't?

[@markmcflounder15]

@@MohseenLala mhhhhhh....yes....one of those 3 has a basic historical foundation

[@libertasinveritas3198]

@@dirkjensen969 We have overwhelming proof, which cannot be said for Islam, nor Mormonism or Atheism.

[@David-ps1rz]

@@dirkjensen969Least the Christ man god they’re following didn’t have sex with a small child.

[@faithfamilyandfuntech5062]

The "you will know them by their fruit" was the tell tale.

[@TheLoveofGod316]

And “even if an angel comes and shares a gospel contrary to what Jesus preached…” is another one.

[@HanaAhmed-x7n]

This is the case with the famous story that almost every Muslim knows, and which deals with children and Muslims, that the Prophet (peace be upon him), the owner of the fifty emigrants, married the mother of the believers (Aisha) at the age of six, and they consummated the marriage with her when she was almost a complete child of nine, the hero of the story that gained the seal of immunity just because it was mentioned in children and Muslims, despite the fact that it contradicts everything that can be contradicted, as it contradicts the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah and the difference in reason, logic, custom, habit, and the timeline of the events and the prophetic aspect, and the story that stipulates its interpretation in five ways. For the chain of transmission and one meaning for the text - the text - and for the length of the hadith, we will mention its first and last parts that contain it specifically, (Al-Bukhari - Chapter on the Prophet’s marriage to Aisha and her arrival with her to Medina and his building - 3894): Taba bin Abi Al-Mughra told us: Ali bin Mihr told us, on the authority of Hisham, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Aisha, may God be pleased with her, who said: “The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, married me when I was six years old, so we arrived in Medina,... and we handed it over to her, and I was nine years old at that time.” Based on the mothers of history and biography books that establish the basis for the prophetic mission (Al-Kamil - History of Damascus - Biographies of the Nobles - History of Al-Tabari - Al-Bidaya wa Al-Nihaya - History of Baghdad - Deaths of Notables, and many others), they almost agree on the timeline of the prophetic events as follows: Interpretation of the prophetic (13) and the migration in Mecca, and (10) advanced in Medina, and began to appear in history in the year (610 AD), in the migration to Medina in the year (623 AD) i.e. after (13) and the migration in Mecca, the Prophet qualified in the year (633 AD) after (10) to perform in Medina, and it is assumed by this agreed-upon line that the Messenger married (Aisha) before the migration to the advanced city, i.e. in the year (620 AD), which corresponded to the tenth year from the beginning of the revelation, and she appeared at the age of (6) years, and he entered her at the end of the first year of the migration i.e. at the end of the year (623 AD), she became prominent (9) years, and that means according to the calendar if she became productive in the year (614 AD), i.e. in the fourth year of The beginning of revelation according to the children's story, and this is a great illusion. Criticism of the novel historically: 1 - Calculating the age of Lady (Aisha) in relation to the age of her sister (Asma bint Abi Bakr - the one with two belts): All the historical truth mentioned above says that (Asma) was older than (Aisha) by (10) years, as Dhat Jawhar narrates without a single difference, that (Asma) was born before the migration to Medina by (27) and the migration, which means that the guardians at the beginning of the prophethood in the year (610 AD) were (14) years old, by deducting everything before the migration (13) years of the prophetic events in Mecca, because (27-13= 14 years), as all the most important news mentioned that she was older than (Aisha) by (10) years, so it is confirmed that the age of (Aisha) was (4) years to start the prophetic attempt in Mecca, in fact she was born before the beginning of the revelation by (4) full years, and that was in the year (606 AD), and the meaning of that according to a simple idea is that when the Messenger married her in Mecca in the tenth year from the beginning of the prophetic vision, the newborn was (14) years, because (4+10=14 years), or in other words, that (Aisha) was born in the year (606 AD), and married the Prophet (620 AD), he acknowledged at the age of (14) years as it was discovered that he had intercourse with her after (3) years and a few months, meaning at the end of the first year of the Hijra and the beginning of the second, in the year (624 AD), so the ninth month becomes (14+3+1= 18 full years), so we must get to know the noble Prophet (Aisha).

[@gaebi]

​@HanaAhmed-x7n that is based on opinion and theory. Aisha is canonically stated by Ibn Kathir to have been a child.

[@HanaAhmed-x7n]

@@gaebi Ibn Kathir mentioned in (Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah) about those who were the first to convert to Islam: “And among the women... Asma bint Abi Bakr and Aisha, who was young. So the conversion to Islam of these people was in three years, and the Messenger of God (may God bless him and grant him peace) was calling in secret. Then God Almighty commanded His Messenger to make the call public.” Of course, this narration indicates that Aisha converted to Islam before the Messenger announced the call in the year (4) of the beginning of the prophetic mission, which is equivalent to the year (614 AD). This means that she believed at least in the year (3), i.e. the year (613 AD). If Aisha, according to the narration of (Al-Bukhari), was born in the year (4) of the beginning of the revelation, this means that she was not on the face of the earth when the Prophet declared the call in the year (4) of the beginning of the call, or that she was an infant, and this contradicts all the evidence that has been reported. However, the correct calculation of her age confirms that she was born in the year (4) before the beginning of the revelation, i.e. the year (606 AD), which entails that her age when the call was declared was in the year (614 AD), equals (8) years, which is consistent with the correct timeline of events, and refutes Al-Bukhari’s narration. 2 - Al-Bukhari himself narrated (Chapter - Abu Bakr’s Neighborhood in the Era of the Prophet) that (Aisha) said: “I never knew my parents except that they were practicing the religion, and not a day passed without the Messenger of God coming to us at both ends of the day, morning and evening. When the Muslims were tested, Abu Bakr left to emigrate towards Abyssinia.” I do not know how Al-Bukhari narrated this, as (Aisha) says that she never knew her parents except that they were practicing the religion, and that was before the migration to Abyssinia as she mentioned, and she says that the Prophet used to come to their house every day, which shows that she was rational for these visits. It is certain that the migration to Abyssinia, unanimously agreed upon by history books, was in the year (5) of the beginning of the prophetic mission, which is equivalent to the year (615 AD). If we believe Al-Bukhari’s narration that Aisha was born in the year (4) of the beginning of the call in the year (614 AD), this means that she was an infant when she emigrated to Abyssinia. How does that agree with the sentence (I did not know my parents) and the word “I know” does not mean… It needs clarification, but according to the correct chronological calculation, Aisha at this time was (4 years before the start of the call, + 5 years before the migration to Abyssinia = 9 years), which was her real age at that time. 3 - Imam (Ahmad) narrated in (Musnad Aisha): “When Khadija died, Khawlah bint Hakim, the wife of Uthman bin Maz’un, came and said: O Messenger of Allah, will you not marry? He said: Who? She said: If you wish, a virgin, and if you wish, a widow. He said: Who is the virgin? She said: The most beloved of Allah’s creation to you is Aisha, the daughter of Abu Bakr.” Here it becomes clear that (Khawlah bint Hakim) presented the virgin and the widow - who had been married previously - to the Prophet. Was she presenting them as if they were ready for marriage, or as if one of them was a child and the Prophet should wait until she reached puberty for marriage? It is certain from the context of the hadith that she was presenting them for current marriage, as evidenced by her saying (If you wish, a virgin, and if you wish, a widow). Therefore, it is not reasonable that Aisha was a child of six years of age at that time, and (Khawlah) presented her for marriage by saying (a virgin). 4 - Imam (Ahmad) also narrated from (Khawlah bint Hakim) a long hadith about Aisha’s engagement to the Messenger, but the important thing in it is the following: “Umm Ruman said: Mut’am bin Adi mentioned her for his son, and by God, Abu Bakr never made a promise and broke it... Perhaps you will be the one who afflicted our friend.” The meaning is simply that (Mut’am bin Adi), who was an unbeliever, had proposed to (Aisha) for his son (Jubair bin Mut’am) before the Noble Prophet, and (Abu Bakr) wanted not to break his promise, so he went to him and found him saying to him, “Perhaps if I marry my son to (Aisha), he will be afflicted,” meaning (believe in your religion). Here we stop with very important results, which are: (Aisha) could not have been engaged before the age of (6) years to an older young man - because he fought the Muslims in Badr and Uhud - who wanted to marry like (Jubair), and it is also impossible for (Abu Bakr) to propose to his daughter to one of the polytheists while they were harming the Muslims in Mecca, which indicates that this was a promise. In the sermon, and that was before the beginning of the prophetic mission, as the two were at a young age, which confirms that (Aisha) was born before the beginning of the prophetic mission for sure. 5 - Al-Bukhari narrated in (Chapter - His saying: Rather, the Hour is their appointed time, and the Hour is more grievous and more bitter) on the authority of (Aisha) who said: “It was revealed to Muhammad [in Mecca, and I was a girl playing, “Rather, the Hour is their appointed time, and the Hour is more grievous and more bitter,” and it is known without dispute that Surat (Al-Qamar) was revealed four years after the beginning of the revelation, equivalent to (614 AD), so if we believe Al-Bukhari’s narration, (Aisha) would either not have been born or she was a newborn infant when the surah was revealed, but (Aisha) says (I was a girl playing), meaning she was a child playing, so how could she not have been born yet? But the account consistent with the events confirms that her age was one (4) year from the beginning of the revelation, when the Surah was revealed she was (8) years old, as we have repeatedly explained, which is consistent with the word (playing girl).

[@HanaAhmed-x7n]

@@gaebi Al-Bukhari narrated in (Chapter: His saying: “Rather, the Hour is their appointed time, and the Hour is more grievous and more bitter”) on the authority of (Aisha) who said: “It was revealed to Muhammad [in Mecca, while I was a young girl playing: “Rather, the Hour is their appointed time, and the Hour is more grievous and more bitter.” It is known without dispute that Surat Al-Qamar was revealed four years after the beginning of the revelation, equivalent to (614 AD). If we believe Al-Bukhari’s narration, then (Aisha) would either not have been born or she was a newborn infant when the Surah was revealed. However, (Aisha) says (I was a young girl playing), meaning she was a child playing, so how could she not have been born yet? However, the calculation that is consistent with the events confirms that her age was one (4) year from the beginning of the revelation, when the Surah was revealed she was (8) years old, as we have repeatedly explained, which is consistent with the word (a young girl playing). 6 - Al-Bukhari narrated (Chapter - The father and others do not marry a virgin or a woman who has been married except with her consent) The Messenger of Allah said: "Do not marry a virgin until you ask her permission." They said: O Messenger of Allah, how is her permission? He said: That she should remain silent." So how can the noble Messenger say this and do the opposite? The hadith that Al-Bukhari narrated about the age of the Mother of the Believers when she got married is attributed to her saying: I used to play with dolls - with dolls - and no one asked her about her permission to marry the Prophet, and how could he ask her when she was a very young child who did not understand the meaning of marriage, and even her consent at this age does not produce a legal effect because it is the consent of someone who is not accountable, nor an adult, nor a sane person. Criticism of the chain of transmission of the narration: Here I will focus on explaining the reasons for the chain of transmission in Al-Bukhari's narration only: The hadith in which the age of (the Mother of the Believers) was mentioned came through five chains of transmission, which are: Furwah bin Abi Al-Mughraa narrated to me: Ali bin Musahhir narrated to us, on the authority of Hisham, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Aisha. Ubaid bin Ismail narrated to me: Abu Usamah narrated to us, on the authority of Hisham, on the authority of his father. Mualla bin Asad told us: Wahib told us, on the authority of Hisham bin Urwa, on the authority of Aisha. Muhammad bin Yusuf told us: Sufyan told us, on the authority of Hisham, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Aisha. Qubaysah bin Uqbah told us: Sufyan told us, on the authority of Hisham bin Urwa, on the authority of Urwa. As we see, all the narrations go back to one narrator, namely (Urwah), who was the only one to narrate from the Mother of the Believers (Aisha), and his son (Hisham) was the only one to narrate from him. The problem lies in (Hisham), as Ibn Hajar said about him in (Huda al-Sari) and (al-Tahdheeb): “And Abd al-Rahman ibn Yusuf ibn Kharash said: Malik did not approve of him. I was informed that Malik criticized him for his narration to the people of Iraq. He came to Kufa three times. Once, he would say: My father told me, I heard Aisha. He came the second time and he would say: My father told me from Aisha. He came the third time and he would say: My father from Aisha.”

[@seannoll2032]

My favorite irony is how Joseph Smith and Muhammad both claimed that God told them they're allowed to sleep with anyone they want and everyone else's wives are their property.

[@anuradhakadam7907]

Mohammad said Allah told him jews and Christians got it wrong, so he must bring the truth, then Joseph Smith said Muslims, jews Christians got it wrong, and so he must bring truth!!! This is what happens when someone falls for the Antichrist system.

[@Diom_des]

Both terrible men morally

[@LeaveMeAloneBleez]

imagine having an unlimited amount of wives, s'ex slaves, having s'ex with children, marrying your adopted son's wife after lusting over her , and being the only one allowed to have sex outside of marriage (this is all in the quran btw)

[@englishtofrenchchristianap8314]

They both got it from the same demon.

[@seannoll2032]

@@Diom_des Yeah it always seemed weird to me that if God was going to hand pick his greatest and holiest prophet, he would pick someone who couldn't control his basic carnal impulses.

[@Myelessar]

Capturing Christianity's "Blasting Islam" arc is one of the best thing I have seen on KZbin recently.

[@Idk-cj8mn]

​@@dirkjensen969 Average muslim coping:

[@AJ_its_so_over]

@@dirkjensen969dirkjenson is funny guy teehee good ragebait haha

[@greenbird679]

@@dirkjensen969 😂 you are talking like allah. I get a feel that I am reading quran when I read your comment 🤣😂

[@polokucoch8112]

​@@dirkjensen969 Joseph Smith learnt well from mahamed and his partner allah...

[@polokucoch8112]

@@dirkjensen969 lol 🤣 no refutation to any arguments. Just gaslighting and trolling. 🤡

[@Simple.BibleTruth]

Jesus is the *TRUE* way to life.

[@jonathon_durno]

Amen! He is the Life!! There is no life outside of Him

[@Simple.BibleTruth]

@@jonathon_durno Amen bro!

[@machineelf9459]

Do you know why? Without knowing why Jesus’ teaching won’t bring the kingdom of God. Ask

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

Have you ever _directly observed_ this Jesus?

[@machineelf9459]

@@Theo_Skeptomai lol if you think you can only believe what you observe you are just like atheists. Believe what is logically proven. Not what people tell you. Evidence must be examined with logic. Without logic you don’t know anything

[@nyctom08]

When you're talking to a Mohammadan: Q: Who says Mohammad is a prophet? A: Allah said that Q: How do you know Allah said that? A: Its in the Quran Q: Who claims the Quran is the word of Allah? A: Mohammad Q: How does this prove Mohammad is a prophet? A: Because the Quran prophesied the arrival of Mohammad Q: Which prophet prophesied that? A: Mohammad Q: So, Muhammad prophesied his own arrival? A: No , the Quran says.... Q: Mohammad said Allah revealed this to him? A: ...Yes...

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& past unitarian christians/jews whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts (kingdoms): 1. Lion: Babylon. 2. Bear: Medo persia. 3. Leopard: Greece. 4. Beast: Rome. Little horn might be hadrian. Rome divided into eastern & western (iron & clay). 5. God's saints: They're daniel 2's stone who ended the feet/beast (little horn's dominion/kingdom). Muslims ended it by ending eastern so they're saints. Dominion over all will be during Messiah (son of man was seen after beast's end) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn's rise & beast's end would be "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & muslim conquest of eastern rome was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom. Saying he's God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach in the symbolic dream (not explanation) part is a fallacy. Worship is a mistranslation & pelach means abad (ref: targums), i.e., serving/revering God (worship) or men (not worship). We revere Jesus. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews whom Quran calls believers (saints) of the past) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline) Abomination: 1290 yamim timer starts the day there's both abomination & absense of valid sacrifice. It isn't 167bc/70 as nothing happened 1290 yamim after them. Nor the antichrist because other "elect deceiver" antichrists (plural) will come between it & him. Jesus didn't return in his generation but the below came true so its genuine. Matthew said, when abomination stands in holy place, Judeans must flee for a tribulation & false Messiahs (plural) deceiving the elect will come. True prophets can also come as John noted. 132's war in Judea leading to exile fits. Bar kokhba deceived the elect (akiva). False Messiahs & tribulation will continue until Messiah, not just during antichrist. Daniel's time of distress spans post greece to pre resurrection day (eternal contempt doesn't fit 33). Abomination of "desolation" is bar kokhba whose high priest was in charge of desolate holy place in 132 or idols put by romans but the year is unclear due to cassius not writing it (129/130/131/132/135). Hadrian's idol is an opinion of Jerome (ref: commentary on matthew). 1290 years passed between 132 & 1422 when ottomans laid previous seige to constantinople but lifted it. It succeeded in 1453 (1335 years after hadrian's rise). End of 1335 yamim isn't the hour as only God knows it, rather it's the start of end phrase with the 4th beast's end.

[@nyctom08]

@@cowdyayaad6378 This nonsense has been refuted many times. Sholars (as you can read in the many critical commentaries on Daniel) generally understand the visions in ch. 7, 8, 9, and 10-12 as referring to the same king responsible for the persecution and the erection of the desolating abomination (a pagan altar placed in the Temple), the Greek Seleucid king Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Chapter 11 gives a very detailed survey of Seleucid and Lagid history and it is easy to follow the sequence of kings to arrive at Antiochus Epiphanes. The final kingdom in ch. 7 is Greece, as the explicit identifications in ch. 8 show (with the he-goat identified as "Greece" whose last king is called the "little horn" as in ch. 7). The he-goat as well as the little horn tramples in 8:7, 10 just as the fourth kingdom tramples in 7:7, 19. The traits of the little horn are the same in both ch. 7 and 8: it speaks boastfully and considers itself superior (7:20, 8:25), wages war against God and oppresses the holy ones (7:21, 25, 8:10, 24), and imposes new laws (7:25, 8:11-13). This king is identical with the king in ch. 9 and 11 who forbids offering and installs the desolating abomination (8:11-13, 9:27, 11:28, 31), under whom the prince of the covenant dies (9:26, 11:22), and who speaks boastfully (11:36). This king will have power to do this for only a limited duration, a little more than 3 years (7:25, 8:14, 9:27, 12:7, 11-12). It is not parsimonious to presume two different "little horns" belonging to different kingdoms who do the same things. The king is recognizably Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who also forbade offering and installed the desolating abomination (1 Maccabees 1:44-49, 54, 2 Maccabees 6:2-11). Thus the Syriac Peshitta adds glosses in 7:5-8 identifying the kingdoms as Babylon, Media, Persia, and Greece, with Antiochus as the little horn. Rome makes a small appearance in ch. 11 as the Kittim who frustrate the king's plans in Egypt (v. 30), a reference to a historical event well-known in Greco-Roman sources. The interpretation of Rome as the fourth kingdom was a later adjustment made by exegetes to accommodate the visions of Daniel to the later period when Greece was no longer the preeminent empire in the Near East. The apocalypse of 4 Ezra written around 100 CE even acknowledges that this interpretation was not the one held by the author of Daniel: "The eagle [i.e. Rome] that you saw coming up from the sea is the fourth kingdom that appeared in a vision to your brother Daniel. But it was not explained to him as I now explain to you" (12:12). Michael Stone wrote in his Hermeneia commentary: "The four empires conception holds a prominent place in Jewish apocalyptic historiography from the time of Daniel on, and 4 Ezra is consciously reinterpreting Daniel’s traditions. This is a fairly rare instance of explicit reference by an apocalypse to prior apocalyptic writings….This verse [12:12] implies that the author of 4 Ezra viewed himself as part of an apocalyptic tradition that went back to Daniel, and even farther, as is explained above. It also implies that he was the recipient of a specially inspired interpretation of this tradition that went beyond that which Daniel had known" (pp. 361, 366). The interpretation that Rome was the fourth kingdom became a mainstay in Christian interpretation until Protestant times when some Christians began to shift the reference to the Papacy (i.e. Rome = "Romanism"), or even to later empires or superpowers like Britain or the United States. This is because the "little horn" in the vision was no longer regarded as referring to a historical personage from the past but rather as to a future antichrist figure, whose appearance has been continually postponed for centuries.

[@cowdyayaad6378]

@@nyctom08 These critical guys say all these nonsense because they deny prophecies. And here you are in a christian channel criticising Islam for not being prophecised when you don't even believe in the concept of prophecies. Stop acting like you are sincere. Antiochus iv didn't defile for 3.5 years. Jesus in mark & matthew (both before your no name apocryphas and translations) put abomination of daniel in the future. Antiochus iv doesn't fit 10 or 3. Medea didn't defeat babylon. Rome is the 4th historically. Three ribs fit achaemenid. Four head fit greece.

[@cowdyayaad6378]

@@nyctom08 These critical guys say all these nonsense because they deny prophecies. And here you are in a christian channel criticising Islam for not being prophecised when you don't even believe in the concept of prophecies. Stop acting like you are sincere.

[@cowdyayaad6378]

@@nyctom08 Antiochus iv didn't defile for 3.5 years. Jesus in mark & matthew (both before your no name apocryphas and translations) put abomination of daniel in the future. Antiochus iv doesn't fit 10 or 3. Medea didn't defeat babylon. Rome is the 4th historically. Three ribs fit achaemenid. Four head fit greece.

[@Abdul_Rahman86]

Ex Muslims here!! He slept with a 9 year old when he was 56 years. When I found that out I broke down and cried. I suffered severe anxiety and guilt for worshipping Muhammad. And if a Muslim says he doesn’t worship Muhammad he’s lying. They praise him day and night every second. They follow his sunnah (teachings and behaviours) they rarely mention Allah without muhammad

[@sultanaldainy2319]

she was 18 not 9 they were wrong it was proved

[@afiron4856]

@@sultanaldainy2319 too bad over 50 Islamic sources and Hadiths say she was 9 when Moham screwed the poor girl

[@afiron4856]

My sympathies for your hardship friend, but so glad you have been freed! God bless!

[@sultanahamed2484]

Prophet soloman had married Rebecca who was 3 yrs old Adam children's married their siblings u don't apply contemporary std to the events happened 1400 yrs ago why father vry beautiful girl Mary to produce his son ? Why could not ugly woman ? Does God need son on earth ,?

[@Sheriff-h8y]

@@sultanaldainy2319she was 99 not 18 it has been proven because Muh likes old grandmas as no one else wanted him to the point he had to get Khadijah father drunk so they can be married.

[@ST-ov8cm]

SO many parallels between Muhammad and Smith

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& unitarian christians/jews of past whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts: Lion: Babylon. Bear: Persia. Leopard: Greece. Beast: Rome. Little horn is hadrian. Eastern & western rome are iron & clay. Stone was set between its division & end. God's saints: They'll hit the feet & take away little horn's dominion (4th kingdom) to end it. Muslims ended it by ending byzantine so they're the saints. Dominion over all will be in future under Messiah (son of man was seen after beast died) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn gaining power over believers & his kingdom's end is "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & conquest of byzantine was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom, rather He gives it. Saying son of man is God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach is a deductive fallacy. These are also in the dream part (not the explanation part), so not completely literal. "Worship him" is a mistranslation & targums prove pelach is aramaic of abad (service or reverence) either to God (worship) or to men (not worship). No reason to chose the formar. And we revere Jesus & will accept him as the leader. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline)

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& unitarian christians/jews of past whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts: Lion: Babylon. Bear: Persia. Leopard: Greece. Beast: Rome. Little horn is hadrian. Eastern & western rome are iron & clay. Stone was set between its division & end. God's saints: They'll hit the feet & take away little horn's dominion (4th kingdom) to end it. Muslims ended it by ending byzantine so they're the saints. Dominion over all will be in future under Messiah (son of man was seen after beast ended) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn gaining power over believers & his kingdom's end is "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & conquest of byzantine was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom, rather He gives it. Saying son of man is God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach is a deductive fallacy. These are also in the dream part (not the explanation part), so not completely literal. "Worship him" is a mistranslation & targums prove pelach is aramaic of abad (service or reverence) either to God (worship) or to men (not worship). No reason to chose the formar. And we revere Jesus. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline)

[@cowdyimammurrahtabari973]

Muslims (& unitarian christians/jews of past whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts: Lion: Babylon. Bear: Persia. Leopard: Greece. Beast: Rome. Little horn is hadrian. Eastern & western rome are iron & clay. Stone was set between its division & end. God's saints: They'll hit the feet & take away little horn's dominion (4th kingdom) to end it. Muslims ended it by ending byzantine so they're the saints. Dominion over all will be during Messiah (son of man was seen after beast ended) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn's rise & his kingdom's end is "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & conquest of byzantine was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom, rather He gives it. Saying son of man is God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach is a deductive fallacy. These are also in the dream part (not the explanation part), so not completely literal. "Worship him" is a mistranslation & targums prove pelach is aramaic of abad (service or reverence) either to God (worship) or to men (not worship). No reason to chose the formar. And we revere Jesus. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline)

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& unitarian christians/jews of past whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts: Lion: Babylon. Bear: Persia. Leopard: Greece. Beast: Rome. Little horn is hadrian. Eastern & western rome are iron & clay. Stone was set between its division & end. God's saints: They'll hit the feet & take away little horn's dominion (4th kingdom) ending it. Muslims did so by ending byzantine so they're the saints. Dominion over all will be during Messiah (son of man was seen after beast ended) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn's rise & his kingdom's end is "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & conquest of byzantine was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom, rather He gives it. Saying son of man is God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach is a deductive fallacy. These are also in the dream part (not the explanation part), so not completely literal. "Worship him" is a mistranslation & targums prove pelach is aramaic of abad (service or reverence) either to God (worship) or to men (not worship). And we revere Jesus. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline)

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& past unitarian christians/jews whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts (kingdoms): 1. Lion: Babylon. 2. Bear: Medo persia. 3. Leopard: Greece. 4. Beast: Rome. Little horn might be hadrian. Rome divided into eastern & western (iron & clay). 5. God's saints: They're daniel 2's stone who ended the feet/beast (little horn's dominion/kingdom). Muslims ended it by ending eastern so they're saints. Dominion over all will be during Messiah (son of man was seen after beast's end) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn's rise & beast's end would be "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & muslim conquest of eastern rome was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom. Saying he's God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach in the symbolic dream (not explanation) part is a fallacy. Worship is a mistranslation & pelach means abad (ref: targums), i.e., serving/revering God (worship) or men (not worship). We revere Jesus. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews whom Quran calls believers (saints) of the past) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline) Abomination: 1290 yamim timer starts the day there's both abomination & absense of valid sacrifice. It isn't 167bc/70 as nothing happened 1290 yamim after them. Nor the antichrist because other "elect deceiver" antichrists (plural) will come between it & him. Jesus didn't return in his generation but the below came true so its genuine. Matthew said, when abomination stands in holy place, Judeans must flee for a tribulation & false Messiahs (plural) deceiving the elect will come. True prophets can also come as John noted. 132's war in Judea leading to exile fits. Bar kokhba deceived the elect (akiva). False Messiahs & tribulation will continue until Messiah, not just during antichrist. Daniel's time of distress spans post greece to pre resurrection day (eternal contempt doesn't fit 33). Abomination of "desolation" is bar kokhba whose high priest was in charge of desolate holy place in 132 or idols put by romans but the year is unclear due to cassius not writing it (129/130/131/132/135). Hadrian's idol is an opinion of Jerome (ref: commentary on matthew). 1290 years passed between 132 & 1422 when ottomans laid previous seige to constantinople but lifted it. It succeeded in 1453 (1335 years after hadrian's rise). End of 1335 yamim isn't the hour as only God knows it, rather it's the start of end phrase with the 4th beast's end.

[@MrWoaaaaah]

For accuracy, Muslims don't claim that Muhammad wrote the quran, but he recited it and others wrote it down. But your point still stands.

[@Bash0382]

That's problematic because who wrote the quran? If its unknown, then their argument that no one knows who wrote the gospels is trash

[@andys3035]

They used to call Muhammad all ears or something like that because he would believe everything he heard. The Quran is a product of a society that would have passed on their beliefs orally and the Quran shows that to be the case because it has quotes from the Talmud, legends of Alexander, the Infancy gospel of Thomas and so on. The Quran is a clear mismesh and something from Muhammad's mind and probably a fallen angel.

[@nicbentulan]

Satan wrote the Quran because Mohammed is the anti-Christ son of Satan aka Allah just as Jesus is the Messiah Son of God?

[@freeyourmind7538]

​@@andys3035 so you're saying that the quran is copying the Bible but somehow CORRECTLY identified Kings and Pharoas that we later came to know because of the Rosetta Stones. 🤷🏾‍♂️

[@andys3035]

@freeyourmind7538 never said that. The Quran plagiarizes other sources via oral tradition. The Quran doesn't necessarily quote verbatim, it just borrows and then says it's revelation. The problem is those sources are before the invention of the Quran.

[@alexiosgaming6504]

Thank you sir, I was muslim for 24 years, after watching this video, it enlightened me, i went to pray isha and then to bed.

[@ironmanILY3000]

Enlightenment and islam doesn't go in hand brother😂

[@SyuhadahSaggitarius]

Alhamdulillah

[@Whoarutlkg2]

⁠@@SyuhadahSaggitariuswho is llah ?

[@SyuhadahSaggitarius]

@@Whoarutlkg2 li-llāh(i), preposition + noun Allāh. Li- is a dative preposition meaning "to".

[@SyuhadahSaggitarius]

@ li-llāh(i), preposition + noun Allāh. Li- is a dative preposition meaning "to".

[@lahleholivia7398]

Islam is built on this one simple fact - Out of all the men on earth Al lah asked a PDF file for help ❗

[@itachitcb5929]

by your comments I know you had zero knowledge about aishah

[@itachitcb5929]

and before Muhammad becomes prophet what do you think he was doing huh tell me islamophobia

[@lahleholivia7398]

@@itachitcb5929 Interesting comment, so he became a PDF file after his "revelation", he wasn't one before his "revelation". What does that tell you❓

[@gooseman4177]

Granted, God appointed many Jewish prophets who were flawed in some shape or form (Jesus being the exception). That being the case, God used their flaws for the grand scheme of the greater good. So if God appointed, Mohammed would radically change despite his many flaws. But.... 😅

[@nataliamundell6266]

​@@itachitcb5929why is it always you guys claiming we are being disingenuous when your sources say it directly we are reading your sources I get you try and harmonise but there are certain things that happened and to pretend they didn't is to not give respect to the text

[@Lord9Genesis]

Mo: "I'm a prophet, trust me bro!"

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& unitarian christians/jews of past whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts: Lion: Babylon. Bear: Persia. Leopard: Greece. Beast: Rome. Little horn is hadrian. Eastern & western rome are iron & clay. Stone was set between its division & end. God's saints: They'll hit the feet & take away little horn's dominion (4th kingdom) to end it. Muslims ended it by ending byzantine so they're the saints. Dominion over all will be in future under Messiah (son of man was seen after beast died) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn gaining power over believers & his kingdom's end is "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & conquest of byzantine was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom, rather He gives it. Saying son of man is God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach is a deductive fallacy. These are also in the dream part (not the explanation part), so not completely literal. "Worship him" is a mistranslation & targums prove pelach is aramaic of abad (service or reverence) either to God (worship) or to men (not worship). No reason to chose the formar. And we revere Jesus & will accept him as the leader. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline) Abomination: 1290 yamim timer starts the day there's both abomination & absense of valid sacrifice. It isn't 167bc/70 as nothing happened 1290 yamim after them. Nor the antichrist because other "elect deceiver" antichrists (plural) will come between it & him. Jesus didn't return in his generation but the below came true so its genuine. Matthew said, when abomination stands in holy place, Judeans must flee for a tribulation & false Messiahs (plural) deceiving the elect will come. True prophets can also come as John noted. 132's war in Judea leading to exile fits. Bar kokhba deceived the elect (akiva). False Messiahs & tribulation will continue until Messiah, not just during antichrist. Daniel's time of distress spans post greece to pre resurrection day (eternal contempt doesn't fit 33). Abomination of "desolation" is bar kokhba whose high priest was in charge of desolate holy place in 132 or idols put by romans but the year is unclear due to cassius not writing it (129/130/131/132/135). Hadrian's idol is an opinion of Jerome (ref: commentary on matthew). 1290 years passed between 132 & 1422 when ottomans laid previous seige to constantinople but lifted it. It succeeded in 1453 (1335 years after hadrian's rise). End of 1335 yamim isn't the hour as only God knows it, rather it's the start of end phrase with the 4th beast's end. An annointed (not "the" annointed implying a different one) was ended & had nothing after (not at the end of) 69 weeks during temple destruction. So it's the last annointed high priest as he was unalived during this time & left no legacy (had nothing) unlike Jesus who ascended.

[@MikandaMaboto]

Mo... hilarious

[@ReinaldoKyesse]

​@JesusLied_ReadTheBible How did Jesus got his prophecy wrong about the coming of the son of man ?

[@stormycode16plays59]

@JesusLied_ReadTheBiblecould you elaborate on your claims

[@staminasandro]

@JesusLied_ReadTheBibleJesus IS the Son of Man lol. You’re a troll get outta here

[@itsthedude3138]

Jesus agrees with this criteria in scripture. “If I alone testify about Myself, My testimony is not true.” ‭‭John‬ ‭5‬:‭31‬

[@JeanSmith-sz4uu]

☀️☀️But he did testify of himself! Just as Moses, and Abraham and Muhammad did: “Jesus answered, “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid”……. (John 8:14 NIV)

[@kardew973]

who recites quran is muslim who understands quran leaves islam.

[@Diom_des]

May Islam cease to exist, Amen

[@lukkash]

Who understands the trinitarian doctrine, leaves Christianity cos of polytheism 😅

[@Diom_des]

@@lukkash Complete opposite. Stop being an idiot respectfully.

[@Diom_des]

@@der_joker2444 Fallacy

[@Diom_des]

@@der_joker2444 Fallacy

[@dashaunjefferies1168]

I remember vaguely Mohammed writing in various verses that if he were lying his aorta would've been severed. Then the hadith records his dying words to be to the effect of "I feel like my aorta is being cut from the poison". With that knowledge and taking Islam seriously, I would've put him under deep scrutiny.

[@Jonathan-y1v3o]

The Jewish woman whose family the caravan Robber destroyed, gave him poisoned meat and he ate it! Why did his god warn him of it? Some prophet. 😂😂

[@hhyling8483]

he admitted it (lying) to the love of his life, who suspected him to be a fraud (Aisha) she accused him saying it seems your God always fulfills your personal wishes (often sex related) Mo got "revelations from allah" to fulfill his wishes, (others just had to belief that)

[@sultanaldainy2319]

yah why would he mack that up

[@adnanrashtogi4553]

Fyi Aorta is being cut Sahih al-Bukhari 4428 Narrated `Aisha: The Prophet (ﷺ) in his ailment in which he died, used to say, "O `Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison." وَقَالَ يُونُسُ عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ، قَالَ عُرْوَةُ قَالَتْ عَائِشَةُ ـ رضى الله عنها ـ كَانَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَقُولُ فِي مَرَضِهِ الَّذِي مَاتَ فِيهِ ‏ "‏ يَا عَائِشَةُ مَا أَزَالُ أَجِدُ أَلَمَ الطَّعَامِ الَّذِي أَكَلْتُ بِخَيْبَرَ، فَهَذَا أَوَانُ وَجَدْتُ انْقِطَاعَ أَبْهَرِي مِنْ ذَلِكَ السَّمِّ ‏"‏‏.‏ Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 4428 In-book reference : Book 64, Hadith 450 USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 5, Book 59, Hadith 713 (deprecated numbering scheme)

[@asfasfasf-p3v]

Capturing Christianity asserts that Prophet Muhammad's claim of being foretold by earlier prophets, specifically Jesus, is unsubstantiated and self-referential, thereby disqualifying him as a true prophet. To evaluate this claim, it's essential to examine both Islamic and Christian scriptures, as well as scholarly interpretations. *Quranic Perspective:* In Surah As-Saff (61:6), the Quran quotes Jesus (Isa) as saying: *"O children of Israel! I am truly Allah’s messenger to you, confirming the Torah which came before me, and giving good news of a messenger after me whose name will be Aḥmad."* The name "Ahmad" is considered another name for Muhammad, suggesting that Jesus predicted Muhammad's advent. *Christian Scriptures:* The New Testament does not contain a direct mention of a future prophet named Ahmad or Muhammad. However, in the Gospel of John, Jesus speaks of the coming of the "Paraclete," a term translated as "Comforter," "Advocate," or "Helper": *"And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Advocate to help you and be with you forever-the Spirit of truth."* (John 14:16-17) Traditional Christian interpretation identifies the Paraclete as the Holy Spirit. However, some Islamic scholars argue that the references to the Paraclete are prophecies about Muhammad, suggesting that the original Greek term "Parakletos" was altered from "Periklytos," meaning "the praised one," which aligns with the meaning of Muhammad's name. This perspective is not widely accepted in mainstream biblical scholarship. *Scholarly Interpretations:* Islamic scholars have long debated the presence of prophecies about Muhammad in the Bible. Some assert that certain descriptions of the Paraclete align with Muhammad's characteristics, while others acknowledge the lack of explicit references. For instance, Maulana Rahmatullah Kairanwi, in his work "Izhar-ul-Haqq," examines changes in the Bible and argues for the presence of such prophecies. The claim that Muhammad's prophethood is self-referential and lacks external validation is a matter of theological interpretation. While the Quran asserts that Jesus foretold Muhammad's coming, explicit references in existing Christian scriptures are absent. The interpretation of the Paraclete as Muhammad is not supported by mainstream biblical scholarship. Therefore, the argument that Muhammad disqualifies himself as a true prophet based on these claims is not conclusively supported by scholarly resources.

[@marisakennedy777]

In Christianity a martyr is someone who is killed because of his faith. In Islam a martyr is someone who is killed while killing others for their faith.

[@gghhoosstt-zy6nd]

Not at all. In Islam, a martyr is anyone who is killed for his faith. And no, there is no motive in Islam that talks about killing others to become a martyr, and you know that very well.

[@marisakennedy777]

@@gghhoosstt-zy6nd Liar. Sahih al-Bukhari 7226, book 94 hadith 1 Mohammed himself said he would want to fight in war against non-muslims until he dies. Palestinians set up shrines for suicide bombers, calling them martyrs because they attacked the innocent and died in the process. A Christian would NEVER consider anything like that "dying for your beliefs" that is attacking others for their beliefs and of course when you attack others they will defend themselves. Early Christians in the Roman empire were killed simply because they taught Roman gods were not real, and because they didn't participate in pagan rites or worship the emperor. That is what being a martyr actually is.

[@miningmecca]

@@gghhoosstt-zy6nd what a load of lies got plenty of vids on my ch that prove u wrong

[@marisakennedy777]

@@gghhoosstt-zy6nd lies, David Wood and AP have proved it over and over, as have any media in arabic

[@Vince-l4k]

The word martyr is Latin, first used by the Romans to describe slaughtered Christians in gladiator games,

[@dekuvisuals9847]

When he tried to commit suicide because he thought God was ignoring him. That's when I realised he was a false prophet because Jesus said “never put the Lord your God to the test”

[@rustycaplinger8036]

Plus allah said if he was a false prophet he would cut off his aorta. And Muhammad did say he felt his aorta being cut from him from the poison at Khibar.

[@NazmulHasan-lq8hi]

​@@rustycaplinger8036His aorta was not cut off He said as if cut off. It is not the same. Also Allah said if muhammad saw said lie he would seize him by his right hand and cut off his aorta. My question is to you as you mentioned it where is the part right hand seizing in the hadith??

[@hemagicmp2773]

As a non believer of any religion I find the Islam to be more convincing and have never seen Christian scholars give convincing answers. 1.Jesus never explicitly claims to be God nor to be worshiped. 2. Jews never said the messiah was to be god incarnate. 3. No trinity is mentioned in the old testament or the new testament as 3 co equal, and co eternal god(s). 4. Corrupted text as claimed by biblical scholars.

[@Nerdygirly147]

“I and the Father are one” -Jesus I will be praying for you❤️

[@hemagicmp2773]

​@@Nerdygirly147 Not explicit, I could say my battalion and I are one, and that is even assuming like the Bible is reliable. I have not seen a convincing answers to these questions.

[@gerdz101]

John 8:58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” “I Am” was the name that God used to identify Himself as Yahweh in the Old Testament. Basically he’s saying he is “Yaweh” even before the Jew’s patriarch was born. Isaiah 7:14: Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call His Name Immanuel. Immanuel means “God is with us” Basically the incarnation of God on Earth. Given Isaiah is not Jewish but the Jews revere him as a prophet.

[@CustomGamesStudios]

The only problem with this argument is that most Muslims do not care 😂. They see the issue, but do not think deeply about it because “Allah knows best” It’s blind faith and ignorance. That’s a combo that can’t be beat without divine intervention. But some of them are so against Jesus (I know they say they love Isa, but open a bible and read about Jesus. They don’t actually love the historical person written in the Gospels) that you will have to slowly wittle at their harden hearts. All you can do is show them the scripture and pray.

[@ChaChaDancin]

Same with Mormons & Joseph Smith. Any criticism is dismissed as “anti-Mormon lies”. So sad.

[@HanaAhmed-x7n]

This is the case with the famous story that almost every Muslim knows, and which deals with children and Muslims, that the Prophet (peace be upon him), the owner of the fifty emigrants, married the mother of the believers (Aisha) at the age of six, and they consummated the marriage with her when she was almost a complete child of nine, the hero of the story that gained the seal of immunity just because it was mentioned in children and Muslims, despite the fact that it contradicts everything that can be contradicted, as it contradicts the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah and the difference in reason, logic, custom, habit, and the timeline of the events and the prophetic aspect, and the story that stipulates its interpretation in five ways. For the chain of transmission and one meaning for the text - the text - and for the length of the hadith, we will mention its first and last parts that contain it specifically, (Al-Bukhari - Chapter on the Prophet’s marriage to Aisha and her arrival with her to Medina and his building - 3894): Taba bin Abi Al-Mughra told us: Ali bin Mihr told us, on the authority of Hisham, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Aisha, may God be pleased with her, who said: “The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, married me when I was six years old, so we arrived in Medina,... and we handed it over to her, and I was nine years old at that time.” Based on the mothers of history and biography books that establish the basis for the prophetic mission (Al-Kamil - History of Damascus - Biographies of the Nobles - History of Al-Tabari - Al-Bidaya wa Al-Nihaya - History of Baghdad - Deaths of Notables, and many others), they almost agree on the timeline of the prophetic events as follows: Interpretation of the prophetic (13) and the migration in Mecca, and (10) advanced in Medina, and began to appear in history in the year (610 AD), in the migration to Medina in the year (623 AD) i.e. after (13) and the migration in Mecca, the Prophet qualified in the year (633 AD) after (10) to perform in Medina, and it is assumed by this agreed-upon line that the Messenger married (Aisha) before the migration to the advanced city, i.e. in the year (620 AD), which corresponded to the tenth year from the beginning of the revelation, and she appeared at the age of (6) years, and he entered her at the end of the first year of the migration i.e. at the end of the year (623 AD), she became prominent (9) years, and that means according to the calendar if she became productive in the year (614 AD), i.e. in the fourth year of The beginning of revelation according to the children's story, and this is a great illusion. Criticism of the novel historically: 1 - Calculating the age of Lady (Aisha) in relation to the age of her sister (Asma bint Abi Bakr - the one with two belts): All the historical truth mentioned above says that (Asma) was older than (Aisha) by (10) years, as Dhat Jawhar narrates without a single difference, that (Asma) was born before the migration to Medina by (27) and the migration, which means that the guardians at the beginning of the prophethood in the year (610 AD) were (14) years old, by deducting everything before the migration (13) years of the prophetic events in Mecca, because (27-13= 14 years), as all the most important news mentioned that she was older than (Aisha) by (10) years, so it is confirmed that the age of (Aisha) was (4) years to start the prophetic attempt in Mecca, in fact she was born before the beginning of the revelation by (4) full years, and that was in the year (606 AD), and the meaning of that according to a simple idea is that when the Messenger married her in Mecca in the tenth year from the beginning of the prophetic vision, the newborn was (14) years, because (4+10=14 years), or in other words, that (Aisha) was born in the year (606 AD), and married the Prophet (620 AD), he acknowledged at the age of (14) years as it was discovered that he had intercourse with her after (3) years and a few months, meaning at the end of the first year of the Hijra and the beginning of the second, in the year (624 AD), so the ninth month becomes (14+3+1= 18 full years), so we must get to know the noble Prophet (Aisha).

[@CustomGamesStudios]

@@HanaAhmed-x7n oh shut up. You posted that long winded lie. Aisha narrated it herself that she was 6 when she was married. You claim she doesn’t even know her own age, but yet you consider her a reliable source about info on your prophet. You follow an illiterate who likes kids a bit too much. And the mother of all believers is too dumb to know she was 18 not 9! 🤡

[@CustomGamesStudios]

@@HanaAhmed-x7n all that math and lying to conclude with this: Aisha didn’t know her own age but we can trust her with other information….. 🤡

[@HanaAhmed-x7n]

@@CustomGamesStudios Scientists have two opinions on this story, and I sent you the other opinion... Look for the dates from a reliable source and calculate... If the lady got married at the age of nine, this does not mean that every girl now at nine has not reached the age to get married, because the time differs by 1400 years... and look for the known kings who got married at that age.

[@RyuBateson218]

I always thought him looting caravans and sleeping with children was proof of him not being a real Prophet.

[@edis_mualaf111]

Mary had pregnant in 11 year old...Your God is pedo 😂😂😂😂😂

[@lanaal-kelani4681]

How old was rebecce when she got married

[@RyuBateson218]

@@lanaal-kelani4681 we don't know. The only trustworthy source about Rebecca explains she carried water and rode a donkey.

[@lanaal-kelani4681]

@@RyuBateson218 why do people think she was three

[@RyuBateson218]

@@lanaal-kelani4681 it's in the Soferim. Some really late scribes that aren't considered authentic except for by a handful of Jewish people. (By the way, it should be camels, not donkeys, my bad)

[@chriswadecki1666]

Difference between a muslim and an ex-muslim is that the ex-muslim actually understands islam.

[@worshipperofallah1]

Not true

[@alixordonez2906]

💯

[@reynoldthemagnificientthun463]

Perfectly True

[@worshipperofallah1]

@@chriswadecki1666 not 💯

[@HollyMolly8982]

Super True!

[@achristian11]

Some atheist claimed that we only believe in Jesus Christ because of miracles. As you said, miracles alone is not enough, we need a package deal and the Bible provides it. Praise Jesus Christ ❤

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

Can you think of any proposition in the Bible that can be demonstrated to be true and factual?

[@davidstrelec2000]

​@@Theo_Skeptomai Parts validated by archeological accuracy.

[@henripechler2100]

👏👏👏👏👍

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

@@davidstrelec2000 Such as?!?

[@luiscrakson]

​@@Theo_SkeptomaiDude archeologists were led by the Bible and everything was there exactly how Bible described it. Please read about all of it a little before commenting. Thabk you

[@Crucian1]

"Ah, but only God could have revealed the Quran, because it is in such excellent Arabic!" say the muslim apologists.

[@paperIrori]

Nah bro, Quixote is the definitive revelation. Read it in Spanish, trust me bro

[@JMJ.516]

One of their more absurd “proofs” for divine origin. What a joke.

[@iiddrrii6051]

Well, it IS in a high-register of Arabic. Whether it's enough to be divine is in the eyes of the beholder.

[@Dalf80s]

Or satan

[@barnabyrt1012]

But it isn't all in Arabic, and even the word Quran isn't Arabic.

[@RandallChase1]

I used to play a game with my students when I taught Cults and World Religions class called “Muslims or Mormons?” They are so much closer than anyone wants to admit! Muhammad being told by angel Gabriel. Joseph “was told by the angel Moroni” so yet again they were BOTH being told the same thing in the same way. BOTH are false prophets. We can confirm this from Galatians 1:8 “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, a curse be on him!” This PROVES they are both false prophets! And the list goes on and on and on….

[@chrisazure1624]

Look at the similarities of Mhmd and Charles Manson. Cult leaders who demanded special favors from the women and instigated violence. We are lucky we had a police force to capture Manson.

[@AlonzoHarris235]

Joseph Smith looks like Paul.

[@marisakennedy777]

Yep, I love that verse

[@RandallChase1]

@@AlonzoHarris235 Joseph Smith is nothing like Paul. Paul was a true spiritual leader Joseph Smith was a liar and a heretic.

[@XAE_A_Xii]

Ye both of them were interested in little girls

[@lesmen4]

*Islam spread by sword dies by internet*

[@boss-zk3vr]

Not sure about that islam will soon have more followers than Christianity so it's obviously not dying

[@XAE_A_Xii]

@@boss-zk3vrIslam is trendy now but in 15 centuries it hasn’t never managed to beat Christianity

[@knowledge-n-Wisdom]

may be In ur dreams...... Islam is the fastest growing religion in the globe

[@EhjazMahdi]

​​@@XAE_A_Xii Really?😂

[@alexmerlin9211]

All of the questions you have about proof of being a prophet have been passed by Prophet Mohammed. Jesus even mentioned about a prophet coming after him. Below are the answers: Question 1. Did a previous prophet predict your coming? ANS: Yes.. Many did. Jesus, Isaiah, Moses, etc. Both in the New and Old testament: John 16 12-13 -> Jesus says the following ->I have much more to say to you, more than you can now bear. 13 But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. (People would say this is a spirit but Jesus is clearly referring to a man here that will speak to us and guide us to the truth. Continue reading the verses further as he says MUCH more about the prophet to come. Read also John 14:16) Deutronomy 18:18: This is told to Moses -> I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him. (The brethren of the Israelites are the Ishmaelites aka arabs. This cannot be Jesus as Jesus was not like Moses and Jesus was a Jew. Moses and Mohammed were both orphans, they were both warriors, they both brought commandments to the people, etc. Jesus did not, as he was a Messiah and did not bring new laws. Jesus even said: Think not that I am come to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." Mathew 15:17) John 1:19-22: Jews asked the following -> He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Messiah.” They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?”. (Here the Jews ask 3 things. "Are you the Messiah? Elijah? The Prophet?" We know Jesus is the Messiah, We Know Elijah, who is the prophet they are referring to? We can clearly see there is another prophet (3rd person) that is supposed to come as well. Which is the prophet mentioned to Moses above. More information can be found here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aX2sn4Gidt6GfNEsi=ylKovDSxmXMRrXQw Question 2: Can we check this prophecy? is there a record we can verify? ANS: Yes. Read the verses above and the other MANY verses that speak about the coming prophet (other than Jesus) in BOTH the Old and New Testament. More verses and details can be found here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aX2sn4Gidt6GfNEsi=ylKovDSxmXMRrXQw Question 3: Is there any other way we can confirm this Prophecy? ANS: Yes, if you read the Quran you will see MANY scientific details and evidences about the world that COULD NOT have been found at the time of prophet Muhammad. Such as the tectonic plates, embryos, Fetal Development, The Quran informs us that the frontal lobe is what the humans use to make decisions, and MUCH MUCH more. Because of this so many scientists converted to Islam since all of this was recently found out using high-tech tools and could not have been found without them. The only person that could have know these things at the time of the prophet was God. More information can be found here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qamkkpx3is6ImK8si=pljkL9rrEXhLhRfR Question 4: Who told you about these prophecies? ANS: This can be found in the Bible, the Torah, The Prophets that Christians and Jews themselves know are actual prophets from God and many more!

[@TheMythicalElliptical]

We need more Catholics to tackle this subject with honesty instead of going at it with kid gloves (huge fan, but lm looking at you, Jimmy Akin). Applaud you for being bold enough for the truth! Keep it up brother

[@undergroundpublishing]

Why Catholics? The Pope says he's the vicar of Christ because he says so. How is that any different? I'm pretty sure there's no scripture that tells the coming of a pope office. Also, 0% of all Catholic clergy meet the biblical qualifications for an elder or a deacon. You want to wrap your head around that...

[@absolute_abundance]

​@@undergroundpublishing exactly ! Many false teachers and prophets that are blind leading the blind

[@worldofjacob1291]

@@undergroundpublishing St Peter was the first Pope. It's in Matthew's gospel. You are Petrus (rock), and on this rock I will build my church. Peter is set apart from the other apostles as the one the church will be built on. The current Pope is the successor of Peter.

[@GuilhermeDias-n1e]

​@@undergroundpublishingIsaiah 22 is about Eliakim receiving the key to the house of David. In Matthew 16 Jesus gives Peter the keys saying that the gates of Hades will not overcome it.

[@undergroundpublishing]

@@worldofjacob1291 That is pure propaganda. Peter was never a bishop anywhere, much less in Rome. No 2nd or 3rd century documents make that claim. Irenaeus says that Linus was the first bishop and Tertullian says that Clement was. Both of them were in Rome. You were not. So stop repeating lies and propaganda.

[@TheProvisionistPerspective]

Boy that thumbnail isn’t going to trigger anyone…not at all. 😅

[@cowdyimammurrahtabari973]

Muslims (& unitarian christians/jews of past whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts: Lion: Babylon. Bear: Persia. Leopard: Greece. Beast: Rome. Little horn is hadrian. Eastern & western rome are iron & clay. Stone was set between its division & end. God's saints: They'll hit the feet & take away little horn's dominion (4th kingdom) to end it. Muslims ended it by ending byzantine so they're the saints. Dominion over all will be in future under Messiah (son of man was seen after beast died) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn gaining power over believers & his kingdom's end is "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & conquest of byzantine was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom, rather He gives it. Saying son of man is God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach is a deductive fallacy. These are also in the dream part (not the explanation part), so not completely literal. "Worship him" is a mistranslation & targums prove pelach is aramaic of abad (service or reverence) either to God (worship) or to men (not worship). No reason to chose the formar. And we revere Jesus & will accept him as the leader. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline) Abomination: 1290 yamim timer starts the day there's both abomination & absense of valid sacrifice. It isn't 167bc/70 as nothing happened 1290 yamim after them. Nor the antichrist because other "elect deceiver" antichrists (plural) will come between it & him. Jesus didn't return in his generation but the below came true so its genuine. Matthew said, when abomination stands in holy place, Judeans must flee for a tribulation & false Messiahs (plural) deceiving the elect will come. True prophets can also come as John noted. 132's war in Judea leading to exile fits. Bar kokhba deceived the elect (akiva). False Messiahs & tribulation will continue until Messiah, not just during antichrist. Daniel's time of distress spans post greece to pre resurrection day (eternal contempt doesn't fit 33). Abomination of "desolation" is bar kokhba whose high priest was in charge of desolate holy place in 132 or idols put by romans but the year is unclear due to cassius not writing it (129/130/131/132/135). Hadrian's idol is an opinion of Jerome (ref: commentary on matthew). 1290 years passed between 132 & 1422 when ottomans laid previous seige to constantinople but lifted it. It succeeded in 1453 (1335 years after hadrian's rise). End of 1335 yamim isn't the hour as only God knows it, rather it's the start of end phrase with the 4th beast's end.

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& unitarian christians/jews of past whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts: Lion: Babylon. Bear: Persia. Leopard: Greece. Beast: Rome. Little horn is hadrian. Eastern & western rome are iron & clay. Stone was set between its division & end. God's saints: They'll hit the feet & take away little horn's dominion (4th kingdom) to end it. Muslims ended it by ending byzantine so they're the saints. Dominion over all will be in future under Messiah (son of man was seen after beast died) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn gaining power over believers & his kingdom's end is "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & conquest of byzantine was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom, rather He gives it. Saying son of man is God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach is a deductive fallacy. These are also in the dream part (not the explanation part), so not completely literal. "Worship him" is a mistranslation & targums prove pelach is aramaic of abad (service or reverence) either to God (worship) or to men (not worship). No reason to chose the formar. And we revere Jesus & will accept him as the leader. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline)

[@cowdyayaad6378]

Muslims (& past unitarian christians/jews whom Quran calls believers) are saints of daniel 7: Beasts (kingdoms): 1. Lion: Babylon. 2. Bear: Medo persia. 3. Leopard: Greece. 4. Beast: Rome. Little horn might be hadrian. Rome divided into eastern & western (iron & clay). 5. God's saints: They're daniel 2's stone who ended the feet/beast (little horn's dominion/kingdom). Muslims ended it by ending eastern so they're saints. Dominion over all will be during Messiah (son of man was seen after beast's end) or is hyperbole like daniel 2:38,39. Time between little horn's rise & beast's end would be "time, times & half". Based on daniel 12:7-12, it means 1335 yamim (means days or years like in amos 4:4). Time between hadrian's rise & muslim conquest of eastern rome was 1335 years 9 months. God isn't a son of man (numbers 23:19) nor is "given" a kingdom. Saying he's God because he comes with (not on) clouds & receives pelach in the symbolic dream (not explanation) part is a fallacy. Worship is a mistranslation & pelach means abad (ref: targums), i.e., serving/revering God (worship) or men (not worship). We revere Jesus. Hadrian as little horn: Attempt to change times & laws: Banned sabbath, biblical holidays, hebrew calender, jewish courts, torah/law study, ritual practices (all followed by non pauline christians & jews whom Quran calls believers (saints) of the past) & imposed his policies. Words against God: Paganised holy city & made pagan temples on temple mount & Jesus's alledged tomb. Rebuilt pantheon, deified himself (like others did) & his bf. Opression: Against divine law abiding christians & jews. Banned them from jerusalem, unalived 600k jews, sold many. 10 & 3 horns: KJV: "10 horns out of this kingdom are 10 kings that'll arise." Not that only they'll rise, neither did only 4 empires (v17) rise. Usurped kings who left no horn due to it being uprooted by other horns fall outside 10. 3 before hadrian were such leaving us with 10. 3 of the 10 fell to senate/prefects' plot. Hadrian humbled (aramaic says humbled, not fought) the 3 by ruling the empire they left without fail just as stone crushed already destroyed gold by ruling their former land. The rest died naturally including claudius (ref: john aveline) Abomination: 1290 yamim timer starts the day there's both abomination & absense of valid sacrifice. It isn't 167bc/70 as nothing happened 1290 yamim after them. Nor the antichrist because other "elect deceiver" antichrists (plural) will come between it & him. Jesus didn't return in his generation but the below came true so its genuine. Matthew said, when abomination stands in holy place, Judeans must flee for a tribulation & false Messiahs (plural) deceiving the elect will come. True prophets can also come as John noted. 132's war in Judea leading to exile fits. Bar kokhba deceived the elect (akiva). False Messiahs & tribulation will continue until Messiah, not just during antichrist. Daniel's time of distress spans post greece to pre resurrection day (eternal contempt doesn't fit 33). Abomination of "desolation" is bar kokhba whose high priest was in charge of desolate holy place in 132 or idols put by romans but the year is unclear due to cassius not writing it (129/130/131/132/135). Hadrian's idol is an opinion of Jerome (ref: commentary on matthew). 1290 years passed between 132 & 1422 when ottomans laid previous seige to constantinople but lifted it. It succeeded in 1453 (1335 years after hadrian's rise). End of 1335 yamim isn't the hour as only God knows it, rather it's the start of end phrase with the 4th beast's end.

[@MarcelAlhind-sr8mv]

​@@cowdyayaad6378 The whole SUNNISM comes from Muhammad. According to SUNNISM.

[@csolorzano1]

Joseph Smith and Mohammed Bin Abdullah are the original Trust Me Bros 🤦‍♂️😂🤣😂😂

[@PMDX.]

So is Paul

[@csolorzano1]

@@PMDX. Really? Paul? Do your research my friend. Paul a former Jewish persecutor of Christ that the disciples accepted him as a true apostle and was written and mentioned by Luke in the Book of Acts, also Paul have many witnesses to back him unlike Mohammed and Joseph Smith whom both have no witnesses to testify their claims. Yeah, nice try there buddy.

[@lyndavonkanel8603]

@@PMDX. NOT.

[@UmerJan-m4j]

Before this video I was a Muslim after this video I am still a Muslim. ★🌙

[@jeliligafaru4425]

Alhamdulillah 😊

[@KingofgraceSARA]

Not all will enter the kingdom of heaven even though the Lord Jesus wants all to come unto Him and not perish.

[@saddy-jod]

Proud to be muslim ☪️❤️

[@ironmanILY3000]

He is not trying to convert you brother loosen up😂

[@user-dv1vv6xw3t]

No Christian scholar has ever won a debate with Islam😅

[@joshpayne1201]

The Quran states that we still have the Gospel and that we should judge Mohammed by the Gospel that we have. I think this makes your case even more convincing. See references below. Quran 3:3-4 the Torah and the Gospel are sent by God to guide people Quran 18:27 no one can change God's words not just the Quran Quran 7:157 the Torah and the Gospel mention Mohamed Quran 5:47 Christians are to judge by the Gospel Quran 5:68 you have no ground to stand on unless you stand on the Torah and the Gospel Quran 10:94 Allah told Mohammed to go to the Jews and Christians for confirmation

[@polokucoch8112]

TRUE. That is the islamic dilemma. There is NO way around it.

[@MakaiJohnkenneth]

All these verses clear have been twisted by Muslim scholars who claim those verses refer to torah psalms gospel which have been lost.thesr are corrupted.

[@MakaiJohnkenneth]

What's strange is those words...corrupt and original lost is not mentioned by Allah

[@umetcalf]

@@MakaiJohnkenneth it literally is when is says they changed the verses with their hands

[@umetcalf]

@@MakaiJohnkenneth why do you guys lie?

[@stooch66]

He just created a Christian heresy and then built a case around it.

[@87asquared]

Unfortunately mimi open the door he shouldn’t have tried to claim legitimacy by claiming things he couldn’t substantiate. If the pdf didn’t claim that he was foretold then you would be right however he did so he opened the door to the agreement.

[@daviddylag6854]

ssame as satanism

[@sambeguely1132]

He mostly used Gnostic material and tulmudic stories which is not 'christian' and hence the clash between the two

[@stooch66]

@JesusLied_ReadTheBible wrong

[@MultiSky7]

@JesusLied_ReadTheBible LDS/Muslim, don't be so hurt by this video.

[@bob0124]

Actually, if this prophecy is remotely true, Ahmed would have been the most common name among Christians before the 7th Century.

[@dyzmadamachus9842]

lol

[@KingofgraceSARA]

AND we'd be speaking Arabic.

[@elainelksuabernet]

I went to a Mormon High School and it was weird when they talk about Joseph Smith and forcing us to memorize scriptures so we can get credits for school. I remembered there was so much drama there with teachers and students, I was Christian then, thank God I am Catholic and find my way home where I belong. As of Mohammed, I watched the Documentary of Fatima and learned that the Blessed Virgin Mary appeared to the three shepherd children near the city of Fatima, Portugal, a place named after both a Muslim princess who was buried there, and the daughter of Mohammed. During the 12th century, Christians armies sought to recapture cities in Spain and Portugal that were being occupied by Muslim forces. In this time period, a knight named Goncalo Hermigues and his companions captured a Muslim princess named Fatima. Fatima fell in love with Goncalo and the two were soon after betrothed. Before their marriage Fatima was baptized into the Catholic faith and took the name Oureana. The Portuguese cities of Fatima and Ourem are said to be named after this Muslim princess. You wonder why Mama Mary visit the 3children in Fatima, because a message is of hope and love to the world. There were more than 7,000+ people there witness the miracle of the sun including reporters and camera men. Fatima love and convert to the Catholic Church help bring that message through our Mama Mary.

[@Kitiwake]

Where satan dwells, bedlam reigns.

[@yohanneslong1970]

Mormonism and Islam are two sides of same coin

[@gateway6827]

Good point about 70,000 Witnesses at Fatima. Mormons should acknowledge that if they believe the shaky 3 or 8 witnesses to the BoM

[@Victim_of_Korean_drama]

" ... the 🌙 under her feet 👣 ." It's also interesting to know that after (Catholic majority) Timor Leste (Portuguese Timor) declared independence from Portugal (the country of our Lady of Fatima)in 1975, (muslim majority Indonesia) invaded and annexed the territory in 1976. Portugal severed diplomatic ties with Indonesia and insisted on UN initiatives to support the Timorese's rights to self-determination. Timor Leste independence formally occurred on 20 May 2002 (May is the month of Mary!).

[@tomn4483]

Id love to hear your thoughts on this: since the miracle of the sun was sent to confirm the apparitions of Mary at Fatima, and according to the children she appeared to she said russia is in error (meaning orthodoxy is false), if the miracle of the sun is true then Mary did appear to the children, which means, if they’re wrong, god either: allowed them to forget what Mary said or allowed them to purposefully twist her words. Both of these are untenable and backed up by nothing but circular justification, not to mention the fact that they would have had all of the motivation in the world to NOT twist God’s words through Mary. What do you think? Does this hold water?

[@IndianaDawn]

What really bothers me is how easily false prophets gain a following. Very odd.

[@tipsy09]

Because lost people follow it. They’re already headed that way.

[@ahmaduahmed8760]

Paul is one such false prophet. His prophecy failed.

[@kenid4144]

​@@ahmaduahmed8760 Did Paul give any prophecy?

[@okayokay5931]

​@@kenid4144 Yes, but it is about the end times, the return of Jesus, the elevation of anti Christ and the ressurection of the living, and the dead. All about things that has not yet happened, so still valid.

[@kenid4144]

@@okayokay5931 Have the end times passed?

[@ryankohnenkamp8946]

16:06 YOU SEEEEEEE! Jesus DID predict Muhammed!!!

[@RandallChase1]

Also in Gal. 1:8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, a curse be on him! This goes to both Joseph and Muhammad because they both claimed angels gave them messages!

[@laurenlooolll]

yesss!!!!

[@maxinedeleon4357]

As well as in 1JOHN 2:22 and 1JOHN 4:3, plus other places in the Bible, 🙏! 👑👑👑

[@chrisazure1624]

@@maxinedeleon4357 1 John 2:22 is my favorite prediction of Mhmd.

[@polokucoch8112]

You're right. I give up now... Jesus DID predict mahamed. Sorry to doubt you... Matthew 24:24 24 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.

[@Dahit-ji6lf]

Why would I being a Christian, believe someone other than Jesus anyway ??

[@DeplatformTheFalseProphets]

One of the biggest reasons is that God would never make a predator a prophet

[@diantonovich]

So, what, you’re saying ALL these Mormons and Muhammadans are BOTH WRONG?!?!

[@NormaB-gu1wz]

Million per cent deceived by the devil

[@DhieuMichael]

@@NormaB-gu1wzthat’s what I’m saying lol

[@edis_mualaf111]

Christianity is pagan cause worship to genital creature

[@johnward43]

Exactly 😂😂😂😂

[@ipadprogamer6763]

Thank you for increasing my belief in Islam even more 😊 It’s funny how confident you are trying to look while you yourself don’t understand Islam at all 😂

[@curtisjordan9210]

1. God decides that Joseph Smith is the chosen prophet, and to make sure everyone knows, He has Joseph, the son of Jacob, foretell Smith's arrival thousands of years in advance. The prophecy is written down in the Jewish Scriptures for all to see. 2. Somehow, God's people completely forget about this prophecy. Despite generations of reverence for the Scriptures and their prophets, the foretelling of the world-changing Joseph Smith vanishes from memory. No scrolls, no records-nothing remains. 3. But God still wants people to believe in Joseph Smith, so He decides to re-reveal the prophecy. But instead of revealing it to historians, scholars, or other people that could verify it... 4. God re-reveals the prophecy directly to Joseph Smith. That's right-God's big plan to verify Joseph Smith as a true prophet is to have the very guy the prophecy is about say, "Hey guys I was definitely foretold, trust me guys, but, uh... only I know about it because God told me directly."

[@johnward43]

Dum, dum, dum, dum, dum, dum, da, da, dummmmm 😂😂😂😂

[@wnichols6671]

The only problem is that Joseph never used that as evidence of his Prophethood, and Cameron has a completely fictional story in his head about what joseph did🤣

[@curtisjordan9210]

​@@wnichols6671 Mormonism rests on the foundation of prophecies and revelations that claim to authenticate its beliefs. Central to this is the figure of Joseph Smith, heralded as the chosen prophet. The narrative begins with the assertion that God foresaw Smith's arrival and, to ensure everyone recognizes him as a true prophet, had Joseph, the son of Jacob, foretell his own coming thousands of years in advance. This prophecy is supposedly inscribed in the Jewish Scriptures for all to see. However, the story quickly becomes perplexing. Despite generations of reverence for these Scriptures, somehow, God's people completely forget about this monumental prophecy. After years of maintaining records and preserving the teachings of their prophets, the foretelling of Joseph Smith vanishes without a trace. No scrolls, no historical documents-nothing remains to attest to its existence. Yet, God's desire for belief in Joseph Smith persists. In an unusual twist, instead of revealing the prophecy to historians or scholars who could verify it, God chooses to re-reveal it directly to Joseph Smith himself. In essence, the divine plan to confirm Smith as a prophet hinges on the very individual the prophecy is about declaring, “Hey guys, I was definitely foretold. Trust me, but only I know about it because God told me directly.” **Skepticism Surrounding the Book of Mormon** Now, consider the Book of Mormon, which concludes with Moroni’s testimony as the sole survivor of a catastrophic battle. He buries the golden plates in upstate New York, a story filled with promise but lacking tangible proof. Unlike the Bible, which features maps and archaeological evidence that substantiate its events, the geographical setting of the Book of Mormon remains a matter of contention. This discrepancy raises skepticism, as Mormons themselves often disagree on where these historical events transpired. This lack of consensus poses a serious challenge to the credibility of the faith. If you were to ask for a map of the Book of Mormon, you would quickly find that it doesn’t exist. Instead, you encounter an intriguing narrative that leaves much to the imagination. In contrast, most Bibles contain detailed maps illustrating key biblical locations. Even among atheists, Christians, and Jews, there is a general agreement on where significant events took place and the existence of corresponding ruins. To illustrate this point further, imagine how difficult it would be to defend the Bible if some Christians claimed that Jerusalem was in Israel, while others insisted it was in southern France or even India. Such divisions would undermine the credibility of the text. In light of this, many Mormon scholars lean toward interpreting the Book of Mormon as allegorical rather than historical. While this perspective might simplify some debates, it inadvertently renders Mormonism as inconsequential as Unitarianism-an ideology that lacks definitive claims and thus doesn’t require robust defense.

[@Dickens76]

This channel is a recent find for me. I can now supliment David Wood and Apostate Prophet.

[@kaywisseh]

“You won’t catch Jesus Christ doing all this shady, fake prophet stuff because Christianty is actually true!” Amen, brother, Amen!!! Praise be to Jesus!!

[@KennyKharbudon]

He was claiming he's no prophet he copied everything and in the end He filled his name as the last prophet to gain glory 😂

[@ॐIo]

People talk about glory, but the man did not eat or live lavishly. And was destined to never bear any children. HE is in the latter section of the most important prophets in the faith. 1} The Prophet Musa/Moses He is known as the One whom heard the Speech of Allah or the one whom Allah spoke to. 2} The Prophet Ibrahim/Abraham ~ He is known as the friend of Allah. 3} The Prophet Nuh/Noah ~ He is known as the Najiyullah The Confidant of Allah. 4} The Prophet lsa/ Jesus He is known as Ruhullah =The Spirit of Allah. Is the MESSIAH. 5} The Prophet Muhammad known as Ahmad, one god praised. And is also known as the praiser of God. Muhammad is mentioned only 4 times, Jesus 25, Noah 43, Abraham 69, and Moses 136.

[@KennyKharbudon]

@@ॐIo read the Bible properly go to Hebrew if you need to understand if his name was in the Bible I'll be a great Muslim I bet!

[@ॐIo]

@@KennyKharbudon Jesus was and is called a false prophet and heretic by the Jews. And now here you are doing the same. Rudimentary argumentation

[@walid69420._.]

​@@KennyKharbudonfind me a bible written in aramaic the word of Jesus and tell me that its authentic to the times of Jesus sadly for u bible is not preserved at all

[@johndoh795]

It's not hard to find. He literally died the way he said God said he would if he had delivered false prophecy. It's the only one of his prophecies that came true.

[@JeanSmith-sz4uu]

☀️☀️☀️☀️I am a member of the Baha’i Faith. Your objections are the same objections that Jews throw at Jesus. Emmanuel was not the name of Jesus. They also claim that Moses and the prophets had never predicted the coming of Jesus and that Jesus and his apostles had made up things that the Old Testament had never claimed. Now, I as a Baha’i believe in both Jesus and Muhammad and I think you are comparing apples with oranges when you inaccurately compare Muhammad with Joseph Smith. All your objections to Muhammad are the same objections that Jews throw at Jesus!

[@seucoelho]

How can you believe in both Jesus and Mohamad, if Mohammad’s quran contradicts what Jesus said? Doesn’t make sense.

[@JeanSmith-sz4uu]

@@seucoelhoWhat contradictions are you talking about?

[@jayfresh444]

​@@seucoelho Alllll Muslims believe n Jesus and Muhammad

[@meglukes]

I love this technique of dunking on Mormonism as a warm up for dunking on Islam.

[@DidYouSeeThis2]

I was a practicing Muslim for about 25 years, but now, at 43, I find myself questioning certain things about my faith. A few years ago, I read the Quran deeply, and while it has many valuable teachings, I also came across parts that didn’t sit well with me. For example, there are verses about using slaves and stories of the Prophet allowing soldiers to take the wives of their enemies. These made me wonder: if the Quran is truly the word of God, why would such things be included? Could it be that, over time, errors crept in as the words were passed down? Some descriptions of Jannah (heaven) also puzzle me, like the idea of having companions (Hoor al-Ayn) or rivers of alcohol. It makes me question if paradise is supposed to be a place for indulgence, like living a Las Vegas or Pattaya lifestyle. These thoughts have left me feeling confused and troubled at times. Even with these doubts, I still live as a Muslim. I pray sometimes but not five times a day its bit hard for me, but like to give charity, do fasting, and try to live a peaceful life with my family. But I’ve come to realize that nothing is perfect, not even religious texts. Instead of digging too deep or trying to prove whether everything is true, I focus on taking the good lessons and living a positive life. I’ve also started to appreciate all religions. I believe every faith has something valuable to offer, and we need them all in society to keep us grounded and united. I admire Christianity for its message of forgiveness, Hinduism for its spirituality and connection to nature, and I have great respect for Israel and the Jewish people for their resilience and traditions. I think we’re all part of one big system. Humans, animals, and plants, we all depend on each other. Nature reminds us that we’re not in control of everything but are part of something bigger. At the end of the day, I’ve accepted that it’s hard-maybe even impossible-to know if God exists or which religion is right. I think when we die, our life just stops, and we return to the same nothingness we were in before birth. So, my goal is to live a meaningful life, embrace the good in all beliefs, and do my part to create a kind and peaceful world.

[@FutureSilent]

The All hoor are like preserved pearls and are untouched and only 1 will be your companion in Jannah for where you will forever abide within Every time you gaze upon her, you see nothing but that which gladdens the heart atleast if you were standfast in the Islam. In beauty they are like rubies and coral. And my theory they are like a mix of different kind of beauty with fair skin and beautiful eyes and with the nobility of an untouched pure loyal muslim companion (think of a untouched princess) And your conversation with them sounds all logical because they understand your meaning of use of words.But you can always go for the normal earthly loyal muslim women for they are the best according to Allah.

[@DidYouSeeThis2]

@ still I don’t know why Allah think women will be more preferred by men after salvation. How about a gay by birth. How long we live in janmah without a bored in jannah. I personally don’t like to spend time with girls. I like more learning stuffs AI programming than drinking alcohol hesesfter and spend time with girls. I think during Muhammed time Aarab thought sex is most fabulous thing in universe. I think stull Arabs thinking same. All innovations and development in middle east with support of America and Europe

[@saban2291]

Én is hasonló következtetésre jutottam.

[@richardasante3897]

Our lives will not go back to nothingness. You are confused because you are actually asking reasonable questions as every human should. There is only ONE TRUTH, WAY, & LIFE. I pray that you find Him. God bless you.

[@DidYouSeeThis2]

@ but i was wondering is that just your belief rite? There are 4300 religions all over the world though we know 6 or 7 and all those believe they are right. Many people around the world strongly believe their own religion is the correct one. But if billions of people follow different faiths with deep conviction, doesn’t that suggest that truth might be more complex than just one perspective? Have you ever considered why people from different backgrounds believe just as strongly as you do?

[@kardew973]

Allah calls to die for him, but Christ calls to live for him !

[@lukkash]

You don’t even know the Bible, go & learn ➡️ *Matthew 10:39* _”He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it”_

[@edis_mualaf111]

​@@lukkashwho told you to worship Jesus

[@RulesToRule]

May Allah give you strength and taufeeq to Accept Islam. AAMEEN

[@ReinaldoKyesse]

No, thanks we don’t want the devil

[@johnward43]

No thanks. 🙂‍↔️

[@tracyboyall2631]

I refuse to worship Satan/

[@RulesToRule]

Don't you believe, you will return only to him.

[@courtneyyandell6637]

Without lies Islam dies.

[@unmaskingislamicphobia]

The Christian and Jewish priest identify the prophet hood in prophet Muhammad 1. Waraka bin naufal ( gospel ) 2. Bahira ( christian priest) 3. Nastorias ( christian priest ) 4. Abdhula ibn salam ( jewish rabbi) 5. Jewish leader nartted by umu salama ( ibn ishque sirath rasul page no 90 )

[@bugdev7384]

idk man, 72 virgins sound too good to not follow

[@millsm43]

But woman will be in Hell according to Islam.

[@emanuela7319]

Don't forget the little servant slave boys, their gonna be serving you non alcoholic wine & cookies for eternity😭 bacha bazi in jennah

[@c.w_]

Or are they grapes?

[@shepherddog1199]

That's why Mohammed did that. To satisfy the carnal, animalistic desires of his neighbors

[@ThereHeGo28]

Just the Lust Demon 😈 drawing you in to drag you to hell for those kinda desires can’t be spiritual

[@randomized2276]

They for some reason think that Adam was a prophet too

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

It's silly to think a fictional mythological character would be a prophet, huh? I'm with you.

[@polokucoch8112]

@@Theo_Skeptomai Adam was Not a prophet. That is true. But Adam was Adam. people without records are mythological characters right?? Even your ancestors from 4000 years ago. you come from a mythological family line. ur not real...

[@marc3dartist601]

The 60 cubits tall guy who was created from clay?

[@polokucoch8112]

@@marc3dartist601 yesh created in mahamed's partner allah's image. allah is everyone!!! SHIRK incoming!!!

[@KingofgraceSARA]

They also forget God Most High made only one woman for him.

[@claujff7092]

May God protect you and your family from any harm 🙏

[@jkm9332]

Islam is finished.

[@iiddrrii6051]

lol

[@chia-yinshih6155]

Miserably

[@KingofgraceSARA]

In the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

[@uncharted-with-shayon]

😂 Search on the internet for the fastest growing religion

[@owed1000]

Quran literally says Muhammad never preferred any miracles

[@bagvillebabacar6569]

Cameron, I know Islamic arguments are pure incoherent trash and that is exciting, but you'll have to cater to them more. They are going muddle this kind argument with a million nuances (like "you don't no arabic", "Ahmed is in the Injil" etc) that make no net difference to the argument. Try not to laugh at them so much. Love you bro.

[@AlonzoHarris235]

You believe he made an ‘argument’? 🥴🤣

[@polokucoch8112]

@@AlonzoHarris235 Where did Cameron not make an argument? Stop being clownish and refute it. Shall we go over it one by one?? alanzahoris325 believes that mahamed was a pedoFILE and his partner allah are 3 gods. Ask CHATGPT if mahamed married a child? CHATGPT : "YES!!!!!!!!!!" 🥴🤣

[@lukemoone4702]

@@AlonzoHarris235so where is Muhammad prophesied in the Torah or Injeel? No Jew or Christian Scholar agrees with Muslims. Not only that, why didn’t the Jews start following Muhammad’s revelation if he was a prophet mentioned in the Torah? Or Christians if he was mentioned in the Gospels? It’s a ridiculous stance that you’re afraid to give up due to what Muslims will do if you are an apostate.

[@umetcalf]

@@lukemoone4702 the jews did in fact follow the prophet Muhammed there many Hadith that show it like when the jews asked the prophet questions that only they would know and he answered their answers correctly.

[@lukemoone4702]

@@umetcalf that probably happened a handful or less, amount of times. The Quran does affirm the Torah and Gospel, and due to it being the last “all time” revelation, you cannot claim they were corrupted. Either way, the Jews casted out Muhammad as well as the Christians. And if you want to use Hadiths then we can we the most disgusting Hadiths to show that your ‘prophet’ is gross, perverted, and a loon. They’re all Sahih too ;)

[@noemiasantos]

NO MATTER WHAT JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO HEAVEN ❤

[@lkae4]

He was the first text scammer. Indeed a miracle.

[@chrisazure1624]

@@dirkjensen969 King Saul or the Apostle Paul? Mzlims hate Paul as he refutes Mhmd on every page of his epistles.

[@greenbird679]

@@dirkjensen969 No. That was Dirk Jensen.

[@HanaAhmed-x7n]

@@lkae4 kzbin.info/www/bejne/pnm6YZSFd76cg80si=JMpNmQylAq-PXebQ

[@ahmaduahmed8760]

​@@chrisazure1624 No, Paul refutes Jesus pbuh on every page of his epistles. Paul knew no Muhammad pbuh, while he equally knew no Jesus pbuh who he never met physically. Muhammad pbuh refutes Paul that's logical. Muhammad pbuh corrected all the damages caused by Paul.

[@lukemoone4702]

@@ahmaduahmed8760there’s a difference between Muhammad and Paul. Paul had witnesses around him, and Muhammad was attacked by an “angel” of light by himself by the means of being pressed so hard he couldn’t stand it three times; and then ran naked and seemed like a loon. Not only that, but Allah hates Muhammad’s mom so much she can’t receive forgiveness even if Muhammad asked Allah, she’s in H3ll for eternity according to allah

[@ehhhhhhhhhhk]

Bro thinks hes testify apologetics 😭😭😭

[@PeterChoi444]

I’m dead 😭😭

[@arafatmarius331]

Bro found testify apologetics and think Testify is a scholar 😭😭😭😭😭

[@RandallChase1]

@@arafatmarius331 Ladies and gentlemen, the Genetic Fallacy in action. 😂 Regardless, I’d never heard of Testify Apologetics until this post mentioned it. And I’ve known what this video has shared for decades. BECAUSE IT’S TRUE!

[@ghostlycookie630]

@@RandallChase1this isn’t an example of the genetic fallacy.

[@arafatmarius331]

@@RandallChase1 Everyone decimated this claim.. Because is baseless

[@Mike-df2tx]

As a practicing Muslim I don’t accept the marriages of the prophet because that’s not morally right but the Jews don’t believe Jesus is a prophet or messiah so who is on the right path here I’m so confused?

[@Jerome616]

When Mormons ask me why I don’t read the book of Mormon to confirm if it’s true, I ask him if they have read the Quran to see if it’s true. I find neither Joseph nor Mohammed to be convincing in their claims as profits of God. by their conduct and their lack of cohesion with the gospel that we do know it is plainly obvious they are not to be taken seriously.

[@henrysamuel8311]

Islam validates Islam. Take it or leave it

[@polokucoch8112]

People are leaving it in droves...

[@5GBasel]

We just need to study it and compare it . We are in the era of information no more hiding or ignorance. Gone are the days that we follow any religion blindly. We need to seek the truth.

[@lukemoone4702]

I’m not sure if this is serious, or if you’re making a satire comment. If you aren’t that’s a circular argument and quite frankly a ridiculous argument.

[@henrysamuel8311]

@@lukemoone4702 lol. It is neither. I am just making a bland statement. A summary of the Islamic position. Those who accept it usually have no problem with this reasoning. Just their choice.

[@lukemoone4702]

@@henrysamuel8311 I’m glad we agree lolol. It’s a dumb argument made my not very high IQ individuals

[@SandileMbekephi]

Man of I also suspect that he was a false prophet.Muslims claim he is Holy Spirit..if he is Holy spirit why is he not talking what Jesus said.I was not a believer but I kneeled down and accepted Jesus.Within a week Holy Spirit did not speak about God Father but taught me about Jesus.If Mohammed is Holy Spirit where is Jesus.Holy Spirit comes only after you accept Jesus and dwell wihin you.Amen

[@arcadelossiervosdelasantav9145]

5:02 Cameron needs to do a better job getting Smith prophecy, is clearly on Mark 13:22…

[@reniistoeva440]

Just a thought - the thumbnail might be off putting to muslims that would otherwise be open to hear you out on the subject.

[@kenid4144]

Please what title would you suggest?

[@reniistoeva440]

@@kenid4144 The title is fine. The thumbnail, however, contains a face with “fake prophet” written on the forehead. Muslims revere Muhammad’s face. So much so that they never show it in their art. From their perspective a thumbnail like that would be considered scandalous - an emotional reaction might keep them from actually clicking on the video and learning about the proof Cameron is talking about.

[@skyorrichegg]

​@@reniistoeva440 *Most modern Muslims revere his face. However, a number of Persian and Eastern Islamic art depicted Muhammad's face and body in the middle ages and there is evidence for portraiture of the prophet early on in Islam. It is probably a good idea for people trying to reach Muslims for Christ to avoid it. And I also think that most Muslims should do a better job not being so emotional when non-Muslims say things they consider scandalous.

[@QuatroHuman]

And when a Muslim share the same hate as you're doing now you're just staring to yelling around

[@Womb_to_Tomb_Apologetics]

Joseph copied his homework from an F- student. 🤡

[@Simple.BibleTruth]

This is a great comparison. Thank for your ministry!

[@chrisazure1624]

Compare them both to Charles Manson.

[@Mike-df2tx]

So then why do the Jews think Jesus is a fals prophet and they believe he will be in hell suffering?

[@jackal_sniperr]

muhammad was the first known pdfile of human history

[@CoachZahabi]

NO SUCH SCRIPTURE EXIST IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 (NIV) states: **"For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was BURIED, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures."** PLEASE GIVE ME THE SCRIPTURE PAUL IS QUOTING HERE.

[@Rizko505]

Of course plenty such scriptures exist in the old testament. The thing Paul has said was also already an early form of a creed known by many Christians. You also left out the rest of the verses that tell how this was seen by many witnesses and apostle's and the last Paul. "5and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. 6After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. 7Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, 8and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born."

[@Rizko505]

And to answer your question where it says such things in the ot: Hosea 6:2 and more importantly Jonah 1:17: And the LORD appointed a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights. And in the new testament Jesus said: Matthew 12:38-40 Then some of the Pharisees and teachers of the law said to him, “Teacher, we want to see a sign from you.” 39 He answered, “A wicked and adulterous generation asks for a sign! But none will be given it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. 40 For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

[@CoachZahabi]

@@Rizko505 what scripture is he quoting?? You are very charitable when interpreting you text but not with other religions. Why the double standard?

[@jobugeorge6578]

​@@CoachZahabi Isaiah 53:9 says about the grave of Jesus Isaiah 53:10 says says that Jesus will be sacrificed yet God will prolong his days Hosea 6:2 says about God raising those who bore the guilt and got crushed, on the third day

[@CoachZahabi]

@@jobugeorge6578 thank you for the citations. Hosea is referring to the Israelites and Judah, I understand that these verses are often “spiritualized” to refer a single person. With that said it doesn’t say “buried” either. There is a lot of charitable interpretations and allowances when it comes to the interpretation of Christianity but not for other religions. This is a double standard.

[@thelostfountain1678]

I tell people on X that if you follow a teaching or group thay tells you that you can't read the Bible and understand it on your own, and that only "they" can tell you what it says, means, or translates to is a false religion PERIOD! Catholics do this, Mormonism, JW's, Mohamed, then that guy with the Passion Bible

[@MelaniesManicures]

Catholics do encourage people to read their Bibles. Catholics are the first Christians. Catholics & Orthodox were originally all Catholics all united. If what you say is true, then all other forms of Christianity are false being that they were started to protest Catholicism or at least 1500 years after Catholicism was here.

[@derechoplano]

Where does it say that private interpretation is true in the Bible? Nowhere. It says the opposite. Why is the Bible the Word of God, as compared to Qur'an or other sacred texts? Because the Catholic church said so back then. Who compiled the Bible? The Catholic Church decided which books should be included and excluded. Whence did the Protestants receive the Bible? From the Catholic Church, which preserved it until 1500 AD. Each time you open the Bible you confirm your faith in the Catholic Church. You're welcome.

[@thelostfountain1678]

@derechoplano so I am guessing you are going to try and use the story of Philip to make your false claim. That Catholic church did not exist until second century at best and it wasn't even Catholic. It was literally the universal church. And I am currently working on a better understanding of the early church. Now that being said. I listen to hundreds of teachers. I like to see what everyone gets out of the scriptures. But your dear leader recently came out with the heretical statement that all religions get you to God. So much for your church authority.

[@azan25]

Alright thanks for making my faith more strong on Islam

[@bravo73]

Talking about Muhammad is talking about a frog who wants to be a prince.

[@edis_mualaf111]

Pagan Romans has worshipped to genital creature

[@سالمةرويدة]

If you do not love him, do not insult him. You are immoral, and Islam commands morality, and what does your soul command you to do?

[@edis_mualaf111]

@@bravo73 Jesus is a Lucifer (Revelation Book 22:16) and Isaiah 14 say Lucifer is Satan...so, Christian worship to Satan😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@روانالاكلبي-ض7ف]

The Prophet Muhammad is a true prophet, even the Christian and Jewish scholars knew that, and some of them believed, and there are those who denied it out of arrogance and envy that he is not one of them. Then what child are you talking about? His wife Aisha was an Arab woman, and Arab women at that time reached puberty quickly, and this was common among the Arabs in the past. Then after his death, she did not complain, but loved him until the last moment of his life. In Islam, women are honored and respected. I am a woman, and I say this. We did not feel any deficiency at all. We live as if we were a precious jewel, not available to everyone.

[@روانالاكلبي-ض7ف]

The Prophet, did not harm anyone unless he harmed one of his companions or prevented the call. Then the Prophet, did not force anyone to convert to Islam. There are three options: either you enter Islam, or you remain in your religion and pay the jizya, for this is Allah’s land, or you fight. These options are only for the sake of spreading the call to all people.

[@nyctom08]

Is Muhammad an excellent moral example for mankind TODAY or just 7th century Arabians?

[@روانالاكلبي-ض7ف]

@ ‏Of course, he is an excellent role model for all times, as he embodied all the good morals that are appropriate for all times and places

[@nyctom08]

"Of course, he is an excellent role model for all times" Would you do this with a 9 year old? Sahih al-Bukhari 5134 "Narrated `Aisha: that the Prophet (ﷺ) married her when she was six years old and *he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old* "

[@nyctom08]

Failure to respond to my previous comment means we can safely assume *YOU WOULD do that with a 9 year old* based on the answer you gave in your previous comment. An answer of *NO means Muhammad's deeds are NOT timeless* and contradicts your previous comment.

[@MuzdokOfficial]

The last verse in the bible is clear to anyone who add or remove/change words in the bible. 🙏 Judgement day

[@Womb_to_Tomb_Apologetics]

Joe was just Mo 2.0.

[@Montimus]

Nuh-uh!! Everything I said is mostly true. Y'all are just haters. I'm sick of you guys. Peace be upon me.

[@nicbentulan]

@@Montimus Why do Christians hypocritically tell Jews Jesus is the Messiah but not Muslims you Mohammed peace be upon you are the anti-Christ given you both had a ministry for 7 years in accordance with Daniel 9:27? - Jesus from 25AD baptism to 32AD crucifixion. - you Mohammed peace be upon you from 622AD year zero to 629AD assassinated by Jewish prophetess Zaynab bint Al-Harith PBUHer w a poisoned lamb showing Islam's 3 main enemies Christianity feminism Judaism. (But the assassination of you Mohammed peace be upon you took 3 years.)

[@Christusvinci]

😂😂😂😂

[@MuzdokOfficial]

False Egyptian prophets in Exodus performing miracles

[@sumedhmahekar2320]

Those who fully understood Islam have already left it

[@Evridikibio1]

I don't know much about Mormonism, but this is the exact circular reasoning that muslims are incapable of escaping (or understand). who is momo? - the final prophet who said he's the final prophet? - allah who heard allah say momo is the final prophet - mono did anyone else hear allah say that momo is the final prophet? - no then how do you know that allah said momo is the final prophet? - it was revealed to momo and he told us I don't think they see it. Not to mention, jibril actually didn't tell momo that he's a prophet. momo's wife and her cousin convinced him that he is a prophet, momo himself believed jibril was a demon and that he was in danger.

[@edis_mualaf111]

Christianity is a cruel religion because they kill human to their sin.... Jesus angry in John 8:37-44 Devil is your father!!!!!

[@rrnonya5472]

I agree, they know, but don't care for multiple reasons... throw away your own soul even though you know it doesn't make sense...

[@Andalus0711]

Why didn’t your gospel give you glad tidings that in the future a false prophet will come along and his religion will become the worlds greatest religion.

[@gms254]

The likes of Mohammed predicted in the bible. Isaiah 29:11-12 The entire vision [of all these things] will be to you like the words of a scroll that is sealed, which they give to one who can read, saying, “Read this, please,” he shall say, “I cannot, for it is sealed.” 12 Then the book will be given to the one who cannot read, saying, “Read this, please.” And he will say, “I cannot read.” Sahih al-Buhari Book 1, Volume 1, 3 The Prophet added, "The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read and I replied, 'I do not know how to read.' Thereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read but again I replied, 'I do not know how to read (or what shall I read)?' Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me, and then released me and said, 'Read in the name of your Lord, who has created (all that exists) has created man from a clot. Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous."

[@rrnonya5472]

such a pathological liar... sheesh, we have google... He is talking only about people who don't believe that (v6) the Lord Almighty will come with thunder and earthquake and great noise,... 11 For you this whole vision is nothing but words sealed in a scroll. And if you give the scroll to someone who can read, and say, “Read this, please,” they will answer, “I can’t; it is sealed.” 12 Or if you give the scroll to someone who cannot read, and say, “Read this, please,” they will answer, “I don’t know how to read.” It has NOTHING TO DO WITH AN ILLITERATE Camel Piss drinking, morally reprobate diddler of little kids who committed ADULTERY with their own sons wives... shall I go on?

[@fesimco4339]

It's so weird you can summon this kind of inquiry and logic for other religions and then, with a totally straight face say things like "But the fact that only a few women in the bible mention his empty tomb is even more proof he really rose from the dead!" Truly astonishing.

[@william3347]

Yes and the Shroud and all those 100's who saw him alive is even more compelling, also Messiah Jesus was prophesized hundreds of years earlier such as '"For unto us a Son is born.." and others Cameron mentioned.

[@richardramirez7209]

Literally 100s of witnesses saw the resurrected Christ. And never denounced their faith and were martyred for it. Nobody would die in the worst way for a “lie”

[@fesimco4339]

@@richardramirez7209 Oh so you're a Mormon then?

[@mrscharmless]

@@fesimco4339The golden tablets did not have 100s of witnesses, nor was anyone martyred for Joseph’s sake.

[@fesimco4339]

@@mrscharmless martyr /ˈmɑːtə/ noun a person who is killed because of their religious or other beliefs. Joseph and Hyrum Smith were killed by a mob in Carthage, Illinois. I'm an Atheist so of course this is bollocks. The problem is I can see the truth about Mormonism and Christianity, special pleading has no place in my home.

[@UzbekExMuslim]

Ex-Muslims from Uzbekistan 🇺🇿

[@andrewbailey9453]

The Qur'an doesn't say Muhammad spilt the moon, the Hadith does and that came after the Qur'an. I think Micky Mouse wrote the Qur'an 😂😂😂😂

[@edis_mualaf111]

Qur'an said it, but it happen in the Day of Resurrection

[@adammustafatheyapple7194]

Why don't you bring Mohammed hijab and debate him on the topic " Muhammad a fake or not"

[@saddy-jod]

Mohammad hijaab win this debate easily 🤍🏴

[@saddy-jod]

Mohammad hijaab win this debate easily 🤍🏴

[@MrKhanain]

Muhammad SAW is a true prophet. There is no doubt abt it. How do u correlate an unknown person claim with a prophet having more than 1 billion followers? U ppl have been challenged to bring a book like Holy Quran and u failed miserably. So what's ur grounds left for talking such nonsense and irrational things

[@georgevectus5468]

1/4 world are sheeps yes

[@Proverbs2521]

Having billions of followers is one of the signs of being a false prophet. Many shall follow their pernicious ways.

[@EnigmaShadow-lg8gm]

​@@Proverbs2521 not forgetting Muhammad is too LUSTFUL for being a prophet No true prophet will stealing his adopted son wife and sleeping in his daughter chest 😂

[@Nutterbutter123]

Technically Mohammed was told by the Angel Gabriel that what has been recites was God’s word- that being the Quran.

[@johnv5275]

@@Nutterbutter123 muhammad never said it was gabriel. He didn't know who it was. It was his wife that convinced him it was gabriel.....

[@RandallChase1]

And Joseph “was told by the angel Moroni” so yet again they were BOTH being told the same thing in the same way. BOTH are false prophets. We can confirm this from Galatians 1:8 “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, a curse be on him!” This PROVES they are both false prophets!

[@muthafuckingjohnny]

Oh yes and in the Bible it's said that even if an angel appears to you with different good news it's bad. Galatians 1:8

[@annemurphy9339]

The violent entity that accosted and terrified muhammad never identified itself as Gabriel. We can know with certainty it was not the servant of YHVH God, the angel Gabriel, because in scripture whenever he’s dispatched with a message to a mortal the first thing Gabriel does is comfort them not to fear. He then delivers YHVH’s message and departs, leaving whoever he was sent to without harm and in peace.

[@collybever]

Jibril is not in the Quran, that is a later tradition. So that is in hadith texts that emerge in the 9C. But that was much later. A problem with that there is that they have a narrative of Mohammed living in Mecca, when that was not realistic, it had so little water that it could not support much life. There is no evidence of the companions of Mohammed, who supposedly ruled in the 7C first half. The Quran is instead in a northern Arabic, the coins are minted up in the north or in west Persia, and have christian and zoroastrian symbols on, in these times. Muawiyah is in 7C texts, but is identifiably christian. Islam looks as if it was being set up as a state religion only in Abd El Malik's reign, when he had to challenged Justinian II of Byzantium in the 690s. There were warlords titled MHMD around earlier, but temporarily successful only.

[@paulkoroma6065]

Bro check this Salam, In the Quran,Surah 69:43-69:46 it had said the following "It is] a revelation from the Lord of the worlds. And if Muhammad had made up about Us some [false] sayings, We would have seized him by the right hand; Then We would have cut from him the aorta" What is fascinating is in the Hadith, I'll say before our Prophet PBUH death, said " "O `Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison." You see even Allah cut him off so Muhammed was not a prophet 😂😂😂 Muslims like to claim things that go against there own Allah

[@starlightHT]

Just read any verse of the Quran.... It seems like a soup of ideas that contradict each other from the beginning to the last page

[@TamjidAhmed-t3n]

this guy should really think again coz here. In the Qur'an, there is a verse that Muslims interpret as referring to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) being mentioned by Jesus (peace be upon him): Surah As-Saff (61:6): "And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, 'O Children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad. In this verse, the name "Ahmad," which is one of the names of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), is mentioned. Ahmad means "the praised one," a name linked to Muhammad's attributes. In the same verse, it says, But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, 'This is obvious magic' you guys can check for your selves

[@DreadedDormammu]

7:157 says Muhammad is written about in the Torah and the Gospel. Where? It's not Solomon 5:16. The root word in Solomon 5:16 is mahkmad, which means "lovely" or "desirable." While the root sounds _vaguely_ similar to Muhammad, it is not Muhammad. Also, in context, the bride is extolling the virtues of her husband to her friends (5:9-16). Verse 16 is correctly translated, "He is altogether lovely." She does not say, "My husband is altogether a prophet who will be born in 1600 years." Lamentations 2:4 uses the same word, which is rendered "pleasant" in English. ================================= [The LORD] hath bent his bow like an enemy: he stood with his right hand as an adversary, and slew all that were *_pleasant (ma-ḥă-mad-dê)_* to the eye in the tabernacle of the daughter of Zion: he poured out his fury like fire. ================================= Interpreting it the way you interpret Song of Solomon 5:16, God "slew all that were Muhammad to the eye." As for the paraklētos in the Book of John, to claim Jesus is speaking of Muhammad in the book of John chapters 14 and 16, you are asserting: - Muhammad is the Holy Ghost/Spirit (John 14:26). - Muhammad appeared to the 1st century disciples on the day of Pentecost (Acts 1:4-8, 2:1-4). - Muhammad dwelled within the disciples (John 14:17). - Muhammad declares that all things *_Father_* Allah has belong to Jesus (John 16:15).

[@mostafaatalla-p9y]

Neither signs nor warnings avail a nation that does not believe.

[@Polynuttery]

Deception is easy. At the Last Supper, “Satan entered him and he …” - Satan can so easily manipulate those who hate God and have room for darkness within.

[@Andalus0711]

Bible written by anonymous authors lol.

[@immanueldasilvayt9137]

Joseph Smith’s literal source : Trust me bro.

[@jmisc]

one criticism I have is the excessive ads in this video. If you care about teaching people and not income, put minimal ads at the beginning and/or end.

[@lukemwills]

My favorite thing that proves Mohammed was a false prophet was the fact that God severed his aorta -- the very thing he spent years saying God would do if he was a false prophet. Case closed.