A tesseract visualized

A tesseract is a cube that has 4 spatial dimensions. A cube with more than 3 spatial dimensions cannot be conceived by our 3-dimensional 3 pounds of grey matter, The Brain. This is a 3-dimensional shadow of a 4-dimensional hypercube. A 4D cube is also called a hypercube.

[@ivanwilcox7350]

My blanket at 3 am when im trying to find the long side

[@vojtechlasovsky2739]

XDD

[@Wowtonical]

hahahaha

[@Facts_Unleashed1]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@sujalsingh558]

bruh 🤣💀

[@youseflatif796]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@torandoeschess]

This is a 4d shape Represented in 3d On a 2d screen Being perceived by my 1d brain

[@staticube7007]

Funny joke man 😐

[@laineylain]

bro copied another joke.

[@Caloteira1665]

Vdd

[@keighlahtaryn3276]

bruh

[@nickibenaiah2551]

Our brain has up to 11 dimensions

[@proddommmm]

My brain aint braining

[@lightinggamer2312]

Same

[@louisrobitaille5810]

Don't worry, it's normal. This is literally 8 cubes folded on themselves in a similar way to how you fold 6 squares on themselves to make a cube. Your brain isn't made to understand this.

[@Hi-tg6xb]

@@louisrobitaille5810 BUT I WANT TO PLEASE

[@freebee9172]

​@@louisrobitaille5810not 8i see 2 cubes one little inside the other bigger🤔

[@RustyLEGOAnimations]

Probably bc, you know, THE IMAGE IS F’ING 4D!?!!

[@squallstopher608]

This is actually just the shadow of a tesseract visualized in 3D space, since we are incapable of actually visualizing 4D. An actual tesseract is made of 8 connected cubes of identical size, with all vertices connected at 90 degree angles. This visual has shifting angles as it rotates, the same way a 2D shadow of a 3D object would. Very cool, regardless.

[@rohanking12able]

What does a 2d shadow look like?

[@squallstopher608]

@@rohanking12able Like any shadow you've ever seen, since they are represented on a 2D surface

[@duel2803]

why does it gore then collapse instead of actually rotating

[@squallstopher608]

@@duel2803 It's doing both. Growing as it rotates towards you, and collapsing as it rotates away

[@rohanking12able]

@@squallstopher608 yea that's not an answer. I have no idea how that factors

[@nest_of_limbs7736]

Feels like playing with those squishy tubes you get as kids.

[@theliam3786]

I think they are called snake toys or something

[@nickibenaiah2551]

@@theliam3786 this is a Tesseract if it exists in a real life, it would be incredibly hard to understand and comprehend

[@FreshWriter]

You can feel this video? 😅

[@thething444]

@@nickibenaiah2551 cause it exists and doesn’t exist at the same time 😅

[@thething444]

@@nickibenaiah2551 I think 😅 😅 😅

[@limehello1797]

0 dimensions = 1 point 1 dimensions = 2 points 1 line 2 dimensions = 4 points 4 lines 1 square 3 dimensions = 8 points 12 lines 6 squares 1 cube 4 dimensions = 16 points 32 lines 24 squares 8 cubes 1 tesseract 5 dimensions = 32 points 80 lines 80 squares 40 cubes 10 tesseracts 1 penteract 6 dimensions = 64 points 192 lines 240 squares 160 cubes 60 tesseracts 12 penteracts 1 hexeract 7 dimensions = 128 points 448 lines 672 squares 560 cubes 280 tesseracts 84 penteracts 14 hexeracts 1 hepteract 8 dimensions = 256 points 1024 lines 1792 squares 1792 cubes 1120 tesseracts 448 penteracts 112 hexeracts 16 hepteracts 9 dimensions = 512 points 2304 lines 4608 squares 5376 cubes 4032 tesseracts 2016 penteracts 672 hexeracts 144 hepteracts 18 octeracts 1 enneract 10 dimensions = 1024 points 5120 lines 11520 squares 15360 cubes 13440 tesseracts 8064 penteracts 3360 hexeracts 960 hepteracts 180 octeracts 20 enneracts 1 dekeract

[@grohmeezy_tv]

And so on

[@xcbnxcbn1880]

Its not true I understand what u want to say but 1 dot is 0 dimensions 2 dots are line and 1 dimension 3 dots are 2 dimensions 4 dots can make 3 dimensions Or you can make a higher dimension from one bellow Section of 2 dimensional object is in 1 dimension Section od 3 dimensional object is in 2 dimensions Section of 4 dimensional object is in 3 dimensions

[@Upgraded.TitanTvman3847]

​@@xcbnxcbn1880 NOPE

[@OneGamerCat]

@@xcbnxcbn1880 thats not how it works, you need to double the points each time. for example, what you said was a dot, was a point. image all 8 corners of a cube, each of those is a point.

[@HereComesBoi]

I like your funny words, magic man

[@monica46549841]

if you look at the center, it will seem as if it's going inside of itself and impossible grasp 3 dimensionally, but you focus around the sides, you'll notice all the outer cubes are just rotating, or going around the inner cube. it is possible to traverse 4d space without touching 3d. nothing goes in of it self, it is because of our limited perception that it may seem.

[@eunicemwicigi8104]

Omg Monica! I see it now!!

[@gp5094_]

Look closely, you'll find that the outer sides are not only rotating around the inner cube, but also its taking the place of the smaller cube and the small one takes place of the large one..the sides are moving in cycle

[@crgaillee]

Picture being inside the square being moved forward into a prrallel dimension.

[@znt790]

It’s not workinggggg😢😢

[@airjacer_2016]

fun fact: these things have a cube as a shadow :)

[@zidniyhakim1970]

my brain aint braining, your comment made me confused because my brain cant imagine a cube as shadow

[@darkarts1188]

So shadow is solid in the 4th dimension?

[@ToastWeather]

​@@darkarts1188I think so yeah because if it's flat it would be 2d

[@spark1400]

@@zidniyhakim1970 that’s normal, no one could ever comprehend what that would actually look like

[@boogiebelly]

@@darkarts1188no, it would just be percived as a cube, just like a cubes shadow would be 2D

[@JJ-ui4ph]

It’s no use of showing something to a person if they can’t understand it. Here is the missing context of what you just watched. You live in a 3d universe. The problem with that is that all the information of a object can’t be expressed in 3d. So you end up viewing something from one angle only and the other half of the image isn’t rendered. Example hold your hand in front you with your palm facing you. You can’t see the back of your hand. Turn your hand so that you can see the back and now you can’t see the palm side. That’s how 3d space works in a nutshell. The 4d cube shown here is TRYING to express all sides of the image to your mind. You can see both the top and the bottom of the cube. You can see both sides of the cube. You can see the front and back of the cube at the same time. The reason that the image is dynamic, is because it’s attempting to show you that you would be able to see inside the cube just like you do outside. That’s the entire reason that it looks to be moving. Fun fact, it doesn’t really move like that. You would be able to see inside of a box just by looking at it while closed. It just moves like that here to convey the idea.

[@zidniyhakim1970]

so the 4th dimension is a place with no privacy?

[@DMD82]

​@zidniyhakim1970 see! How easy quantum mechanics is hey!

[@brianj1203]

@@zidniyhakim1970no privacy for us 3D people for a 4D person.

[@Lee-lc1fs]

Brilliant! I applaud you, and encourage you to continue sharing your knowledge. Iron sharpens iron 🧠

[@zol_z_art9347]

You can see inside the box if yo6are above the given dimension

[@l.p4251]

A tesseract also looks like 2 cubes connected with all summits thought we can't map out the faces but we can map out the lines, if you see the 2 connected summit cube thing from an certain perspective, it looks like as if there was a smaller cube inside of a bigger one

[@renzourquiza]

11D about to show 7 cubes connected

[@freebee9172]

That's exactly what I'm seeing 👀

[@ArmenianIsraeliMapper]

My brain ain’t braining rn guys

[@XxTRYxX0]

Feels like the inside square is becoming the outside and the outside being inside, which it seems to loop for me

[@Mr_Matuto]

My 3 brain cells can not comprehend this

[@thatrandomspaceguy]

"911 what's your emergency" "My cube ain't cubing"

[@k.i.i.3699]

Humans will never be able to see a tesseract with our naked eyes in this 3D world. Never.

[@SamanthaSponder]

This is so satisfying

[@ryanherrick9847]

Thank you! This has motion.

[@daynaobrien869]

Test: Explain a Tessaract Me: A cube inside a cube that's attached to the outer cube with 4 diagonal lines, that's moving Teacher: :_:

[@yacotainkohsoinkmaimann]

um actually its 8 diagonal lines 🤓

[@blinkenschnaag777]

If you have shape shifting abilities, then that's the basic image of it

[@GmonkeyJ777]

Really?

[@blinkenschnaag777]

It's actually more complicated than that

[@trisk4806]

Tell me more

[@montyjohnn2826]

But would it sort of look more like someone shape shifting constantly never stopping and that can be in any form

[@blinkenschnaag777]

@@trisk4806 you'll know more if you find out yourself 😉

[@LITE0V]

MY BRAINS NOT BRAINING

[@ReganaldVonCluck]

This should go on a videos to watch while high compilation

[@93ChristopherC]

Im high rn

[@mrnobody607]

@@93ChristopherC im also high rn

[@Graeaeae]

It happened by accident but I’m glad it popped up

[@Nick12_45]

Thinking about this actually makes intuitive sense

[@TrueTerrariaEnthusiast]

I study the 4th dimension. I honestly don't know why this form of tesseract is used most.

[@thebgmrings2790]

We are 3-d beings and in present we can't even able to make an image of a tesseract cube in our mind with defined vertices and edges 🧐😶‍🌫🤯

[@Rockpaperscissor999]

How it feels to turn a wrist band inside out:

[@TubbyBruh]

I’m high rn and you just made me lose touch with reality wtf is this bro 💀💀💀🔥🔥🔥

[@decract]

Its simple. Imagine trying to draw a cube in a paper that shaped like a line.

[@thernelljohnson4566]

I love these types of tessaracts they look like moving by side by side but its not? Mind:boom!

[@raduconstantinescu5824]

If you imagine really hard, you can see the movement represents the area of a 3d donut.

[@decract]

Imagine trying to draw a cube in a 1d paper

[@Shrek40K]

HOLY SHIT I GOT IT, I GOT IT! I GOT THE FOURTH DIMENSION, I UNDERSTAND IT! I can’t explain this shit in text, I’ll make a video soon, whenever it’s done I’ll edit this comment, I SWEAR IT IS NOT BAIT! Edit: I gave up, my voice annoys me too much 😔 Explanation; listen up, if the first dimension is only left and right, they can’t go up and down. The second dimension is left, right, up and down. They can’t go back and forth. The third dimension is left, right, up, down, back and forth. The one thing that keeps us from going any/everywhere we go is physical objects, same go to the other 2 dimensions. Every dimension can pierce the ones below it. So the fourth dimension would be in and out. You can’t just go through a wall because it’s a physical object, we can’t just walk right through it, the same way the second dimension can’t just go back and forth. Splitting an object in 2 still doesn’t make us see the real inside of it, it only creates 2 separate objects with their own inside of them. It would also be proven by the video, since the 2 third dimensional squares are coming in and out of each other at the same time. I don’t think I will be posting the video tho :/

[@milewesler9592]

It's a lot easier to understand with spheres

[@ONEMoneyONE]

I can guarentee you don't understand it

[@louisrobitaille5810]

@@ONEMoneyONEI can guarantee I understand it, but I can't put it in words either. I don't get the 4th dimension as a whole, but I get how a tesseract works. It's weird as fuck, so weird that I don't even remotely have close to the right words to explain it.

[@TinaParisi-ch7cj]

​@@louisrobitaille5810If you can't explain it, you don't understand it.

[@Noughtsgnik]

Tell

[@Sleepingcatgaming191]

My brain hurts 😵‍💫

[@Mosaic-xerox]

This is an atom of a 4D structure

[@theliam3786]

The atoms wouldn’t be shaped like hypercubes though but rather hyperspheres

[@captainvaughn5692]

​@@theliam3786 doesn't this destroy everything we know about the universe

[@louisrobitaille5810]

@@captainvaughn5692ot really. If anything, it could explain quantum entanglement 🤷‍♂️. Oh and quick edit: the 2 current best approaches for string theory are currently looking at a universe with 10 and 26 dimensions respectively. So no, having atomic and sub-atomic particles in more than 3D wouldn't break the universe, quite the opposite. It might be the theory of everything that we're looking for 😁 (although it's apparently becoming more and more unlikely 😢).

[@captainvaughn5692]

@@louisrobitaille5810 That's what i'm saying, it could explan a lot, but more and more questions would be created that we cannot find an answer for, literally. We have no idea about other spacial dimensions, the sad truth is, String Theory makes more trouble than good. It tries to explain gravitation, but for that we need 26 spacial dimensions, little strings and a super "force". So looking at it, it makes things worse than they are already.

[@captainvaughn5692]

@@louisrobitaille5810 But what i originally meant with my previous comment was, that if we knew other spacial dimension existed, it wouldn't help us anyway. A 3 dimensional being cannot comprehend anything from another spacial dimension, our brain would probably even die looking at a tesseract. Given that, if everything known in our universe was moredimensional, Our laws of physics would only apply in our own dimension. We are not made to understand how we were made.

[@davesmith3613]

Far out! (And in, up, down, and round) and near

[@bigkingspeakerdwestemperor5068]

It only gets worse deeper down the rabbit hole...

[@decract]

Its simple. Imagine trying to draw a cube in a line shaped paper that is infinitely thin. You can't.

[@longhorse15]

2d beings:"this is what a 3d square looks like"

[@brianj1203]

Yea pretty much same mindset in their view. 2D beings are having a convo like “We don’t know what Cubes like look fully but we know the shadow of it in our world on paper.

[@familiejohann1451]

My bed sheet if i try finding the longer side😂

[@bob_the_brick]

This is definitely an ender chest

[@cralisHome]

I’m putting my hand through that.

[@danohanlon8316]

Looking at this I begin to understand what’s going through my dog’s mind as she watches me using my iPad.

[@JamesMEastley]

This makes a ton on sense, and shows how 4d being are able to perceive our 3d world.

[@spider_kirby]

its literally a cube in a cube, becoming the outside of the cube, and swapping again. honestly, this is the easiest 4D shape to comprehend.

[@xKarenWalkerx]

Could it be time ceases to exist in the 4th dimension this is like a never ending hallway.

[@LLoumak]

Its like it turns inside out. Like a dognut.

[@Phoenixda_man]

Every line is now an axis. For every dimension another axis will be added. There are two squares changing size. The fourth dimension's axis is size. Say there is a one dimensional creature. Draw 3 lines on a paper like this | - | the one dimensional creature (-) can only move on one axis, X. You have to use the axis Y to get out. Draw five lines on a paper like this. __ | • | ----- Imagine the lines are enclosed. There is a new axis, Y. You can only get out using the third dimension's axis, Z. Now imagine you are trapped in an unbreakable cube cell. You have to use the fourth dimension, size to change the size of the cell or yourself to break out. This is like noclipping in a video game or like changing the size of objects in Superliminal.

[@TSSAmbassador]

Being able to see the 3rd dimention is seeing everything we can't see or comprehend. Maybe a 4th dimensional being knows or studies the unified theory.

[@plasterandcheese]

me: *t e s s e r a c t*

[@FXNZO_EX]

my 2 brain cells trying to decipher this series of frames at 3am:

[@FishZGaming]

My blanket when I am trying to find the inside:

[@ForceOfDarknessYT]

That's trippy

[@Roach-community]

Teacher: The test isn’t that confusing! The test: how many sides does *this monstrosity* have?

[@coldybgfan6339]

A cube in a cube connected with cubes

[@tentacle_knight]

To put it simple, its a 2 dimensional image of a 3 dimensional representation of a 4 dimensional hyper-cube. Pretty trippy shit.

[@aliasunknown7476]

Time has to slow down and speed up in very specific instances for this shape to exist like around a black hole.

[@USOKAAU]

Pov: your 5D looking at a page thats 4d

[@Garfield979]

I’m gonna watch this for ten years straight and become a 4 dimensional monster

[@carythestickman]

Can I get to the end of the animation please?

[@ShadowGaming54402]

My brain is too confused

[@RilB243-average_ppt_fan-]

My brain can't process this rn

[@swedhgemoni8092]

Trippy.

[@distro3928]

Makes sense that it varies in shape

[@ART.OF.A]

eyes not eyeing Brain.exe has stopped working

[@Darksunmain]

This is hurting my brain so bad so now I have a headache

[@Proxy606]

Bro Right before this video was a video about a tesseract…

[@planto_]

4d: You 3rd Dimensional beings will never know my next move

[@DiorAngelVevo]

😂😂😂

[@tecentguru]

💀💀

[@comicboi92]

I lile the theory of if we saw a 4d shape pass through our world, it would look like it appears, expands, and then shrinks and dissapears, much like if a 3d shape went through a 2d world (for example a ball passing through a paper)

[@KJLT20]

so a small cube inside a big cube that gets big while the big cube becomes small cube

[@dcap09876]

Shadow only the real thing is moving in way more directions 💥 🤯

[@TotallyNotMarshmallow]

Bru i jus watched a short explaning the fourth dimension and it had a tesseract, and now i get this one

[@jiannisDimi]

There is a cube and inside another smaller cube... A line connect each corner of the cube inside to a corner of the cube outside.. 8 corners the cube inside 8 corners the cube outside 8 lines that connect the two cubes Then the small cube inside, moves THROUGH the front side of the big tube, drugging the whole structure with. The small cube becomes the big one.. The back side of the small cube becomes the front side of the big one, and the 4 lines that connected its back side with the bigger cube become the lines of the sides of the new appeared small cube...and so on. This is a rotation in z und w axis...

[@Jewelznova]

I just don’t get why it moves in this formation, I keep thinking of a 3D model of the tesserect

[@Judge_0f_Everything]

Bro shut up

[@jiannisDimi]

@@Jewelznova well, the whole description was necessary to be sure that we see the same thing... to identify the small cube expanding somehow, (rotating in a 4D axis) to form the big cube...Of course the whole moving structure includes in addition 6 more streching cubes... Dont forget that we try to project on our 2D handys surfaces a 4D rotating cube. Say we were trying to progect a motionless 3D building...🕋 on our 2D screen..its obviously formed from many different slices of its 3D structure, together one upon another from the bottom to the top of its cube schape. . 2D slices projected all together to form the 2D schadow of a 3D cube If you project just a 2D slice, say a piece of paper, totaly perpendicular on the handy surface, its schadow has to appear as a 1D straight line. Thats its projection schadow... A piece of macaroni further, perpendicular on the surface, may make a 0D schadow, that is a dot.. However, the interchanging from a small to a big cube, is not a mere projection of a tesseract, its the rotation of the 4D cube in its 4D axis... If we had rotated the tesseract in one of its three 3D axes, it would have changed its schadow form, but it would not have changed its size... (From small to big)....

[@jiannisDimi]

@@Jewelznova A cube is a 3D item. Here on our Handys surfare, we can see it as a 2D exagon 🕋... Top and bottom corners are dragged outwards, to give it the 3D look... You can rotare a dart cube in your fingers any way you want, these are the rotations of a cube in the three axes x, y, z in 3 dimensional space. On a Handys surface, you can also observe the cube revolting up and down, or right and left, changing his shape... A side of a cube, alone, say is a 2 D plane. The same way as THE UPPER SIDE OF A CUBE is connected with four lines down to the bottom side to form an object of six sides, a 3D cube , the same way, an small 3D cube has to be connected with lines, that begin from all its 8 corners with all 8 corners of a bigger 3D cube, and that is the 4D cube or the tesseract. If the small cube remains small unchanged in the center of the large cube, and together they rotate left or right, up or down, then they rotate in 3 dimentions, x, y, z, Here in this clip, they move interchanging, the small cube becomes the large one, and the large one becomes a small cube.. What we see on the 2D surface of our Handys, is the projection of a 4D cube, rotating in axis w, in the 4th dimensional axis....

[@seikeramirez]

Ok but, what it means?

[@Datonefurry]

My eyes and brain hurt

[@chesshackerArk]

Congrats you finally saw four dimension object

[@beesechurger1]

Wait so if we were to try and perceive an inanimate object in 4D as a 3 dimensional being, it would look like the object is animated and moving for us?

[@extra_cur2e]

Its like going out

[@vicky_picky-]

I kinda understand it now

[@pisspenguin]

As Q*bert, this cube scares me

[@pufflecult]

It's not scares me, i love tesseracts unlike cubes, they are cooler

[@pisspenguin]

​@@pufflecult shut up you ꩜!#?꩜ oc You're oc, your opinion does not count

[@itsactually_rayi]

guys i think my brain isnt braining

[@furnaceheadgames9001]

That's the shadow of a tesseract

[@thebestplayerispatapete4564]

I now understand the 4d rotation a bit

[@swordstrikeedits]

My brain can't comprehend how this works

[@RobsGravity]

Imagine something you can open and close like your fridge for a simple example. When the fridge is closed you can't see what's inside. If your fridge was a 4D object you would be able to see everything inside no matter the fact it's closed. This video is trying to convey that by rotating the cube inside and out of itself to show all sides of said object. Hope that helps alil❤

[@Qwertoiy]

I comprehend this shape, not 5D shapes at all, but this shape must NOT move to be an real shape, a tesseract like this (a.k.a. an hyper cube) would be an *warping cube*

[@patrickadi6155]

Focus on 1 side, it will help

[@babacu-gc3gp]

Meu tesseract.

[@rocryptocytic]

if ypu focus ob one lone you realise there are still 31 or so lines 🤔🤔🤔

[@spongebobpopsicle5776]

My brain is a hurt

[@gneu1527]

The reason why it looks like it's going through itself and changing sizes is because in th3 4th dimension people are supposed to see EVERY side of an object. So our minds can't comprehend it as our eyes are built to see objects only from the angle we stare at them from. And in 2D I think uhh idk

[@scentisble]

It’s making me dizzy 😵‍💫

[@reglamorales2450]

I looked at it for a long time and now how it works.

[@A1_DASH]

I can see it rotating. I just beat the optical illusion 😂

[@boba1635]

Nice soul.

[@mr.madsen9678]

I need one of those.

[@BAD_LS]

Why is it moving in just one direction/axis if there should be four?

[@airjacer_2016]

we live in a 3d world but a 4d world would see somthin else.

[@Steven-ig6tw]

A tesseract is just easy to explain it is a cube inside a cube connected with the lines in the corners yea

[@KuDastardly]

Think of it as a donut but rolling it inside out along its inner diameter.

[@mohamedsiddik2728]

The changing shape of tesseract is quite similar to 🔥 fire.

[@MistaTurdburgerz]

This could be a lot smoother, imagine if all sides were not only equal to eachother, but constant in length

[@Nick-Omni]

4d: we are ♾♾♾ 5D: keep talking losers

[@fawadfawadi4211]

this is most simple to understand

[@YourBoyMason_]

Finding the ketchup in the fridge: