Nice work , you could even teach some math in this style and it would be very nice . Keep up the brief historic videos too .
@saqlainraza22193 жыл бұрын
Man you're the best channel I've found! Everything that I'm interested in regarding mathematics I find in this channel and history is always interesting so that makes it even better!!
@jtgd3 жыл бұрын
Love math and history together
@reptilewithsadhumaneyes3 жыл бұрын
I love your videos and this is my favorite so far, thanks so much for your hard work : )
@RonaldModesitt3 жыл бұрын
Echo to Ganatra's comments. Very well done. Please make more videos.
@lexflow23199 ай бұрын
Thats crazy man. Good explanation.
@karanmungra56304 жыл бұрын
Happy New Year dude. Hope someone will be able to prove the tough Riemann Hypo in this new year.
@nonbiological3 жыл бұрын
We can try
@orgesleka67804 жыл бұрын
Great work. Thanks!
@antonyjames4441 Жыл бұрын
The fact that square root of a negative number does not exist in the real number system was recognised by the Greeks. But the credit goes to the Indian mathematician Mahavira (850) who first stated this difficulty clearly. “He mentions in his work ‘Ganitasara Sangraha’ as in the nature of things a negative (quantity) is not a square (quantity)’, it has, therefore, no square root”. Bhaskara, another Indian mathematician, also writes in his work Bijaganita, written in 1150. “There is no square root of a negative quantity, for it is not a square.”
@maxflentge4 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for these videos!
@samueldeandrade853511 ай бұрын
12:00 "oddly enough, Vessel wasn't a professional mathematician". Man, actually, there is NOTHING odd about that. The odd thing is that people forgot Math, and any other branch of knowledge really, can be studied by anyone. Especially Math! I mean, until being Mathematician became a job, a lot of Mathematics were already developed.
@brooktewolde57753 жыл бұрын
thanks for saving my essay :D
@tonychinnery6 ай бұрын
Its strange that Euler, who came up with the famous identity Z = a(cos(thi) + i sin (thi)) did not think of the complex plane, because the formula seems to indicate a triangle.
@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634Ай бұрын
He found that formula by setting iθ to the e^x Taylor series but was that legit? The e^x Taylor series was created for real numbers. Did euler prove it is also true for imaginary numbers?
@ethanjensen79673 жыл бұрын
Weierstrass next!
@yizhang70273 жыл бұрын
13:57 Legendre's portrait is incorrect. His wikipedia article has info regarding this.
@durgeshsharma57573 жыл бұрын
Great video
@michaelgonzalez90582 жыл бұрын
Current being continue of negative 1 is the √ of π
@NikolajKuntner4 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@davidshechtman47463 жыл бұрын
Complex analysis....of the history of complex analysis
@renukareddy22802 жыл бұрын
Your talking about 4th dimension tha Godwin Childright traveled through his mind
@KevE3 жыл бұрын
Very good video
@mjnyc86556 ай бұрын
The contribution of de Moivre was skipped over here.
@venusdreams87743 жыл бұрын
Do matrices pleassee
@Nerdwithoutglasses2 жыл бұрын
I think we discovered it, not invented, like our ancestors only cares about the whole numbers not all real numbers
@waliaphellps1745 Жыл бұрын
Complex numbers do not multiply as vectors, or am I wrong?
@seanshameless04 ай бұрын
Not as vector but you can explain complex numbers as matrixes
@serhansahin89894 жыл бұрын
👍👍
@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634Ай бұрын
Complex plane is absurd. Why is the imaginary axis unit (i) depicted equal in length to the real axis unit (1)?