with 17 seconds and a relatively easy game tying field goal available, not sure why they were passing...
@BillinHungary17 күн бұрын
the ball was on the 19, so the FG would have been 37 yards and they could have run for a few more yards and use their last TO.
@spencergwin945417 күн бұрын
Me, neither. Questionable play calling or decision-making, one or the other
@harrisonluthren659514 күн бұрын
Clemson has had major problems with their FG unit all season and I’m pretty sure Dabo really didn’t want to have to deal with Sellers and that defense in OT. I get why he was going for the win in that situation
@spencergwin945414 күн бұрын
@harrisonluthren6595 Point considered
@tripphood599318 күн бұрын
sellers is dada
@bcp5296dКүн бұрын
Sellers is going to spend a lot of time owning dabo and his weak defenses.
@bcp5296dКүн бұрын
LOL.
@propotato423118 күн бұрын
The refs were heavily against Clemson this game
@MeanJoeGreen7918 күн бұрын
Wow! SC had 2 times the number of penalties and 4 times the penalty yards. Explain
@propotato423118 күн бұрын
@ I could explain but then you could also….idk watch the game, pretty clear sc deserved those penalties, which is not what I’m even talking about, I’m talking about the calls
@curlyqv246718 күн бұрын
@@MeanJoeGreen79 They didn't like the questionable fumble recovery. That's about the only call I didn't understand, either, but happy it went our way. Other than that, calls were pretty fair aside from the delay of game that forced us to kick a field goal where they didn't reset the clock properly
@rydergibbs418 күн бұрын
@@MeanJoeGreen79thats bc of 3 unsportsmanlike conduct penalties. USC played way less disciplined. Thats not poor officiating