This is just one of the most insightful 5 minutes of speaking I have ever heard.
@sibengerard18564 жыл бұрын
I absolutely agree with you-
@michaelureadi28845 жыл бұрын
What an insight into the human condition...Don't you just love the way Adam Philips articulates on this...
@birenderyadav25112 ай бұрын
loved it. Pursuit of happyness is becoming the cause of our unhappiness (read somewhere). Very relatable. The concept of being 'happy and enjoying' is a 'market construct'. Society need to bring back the older concept of 'be good '. Just like a child who wants to become multiple things... adults too should keep the pursuit on. I never knew what I would become when I was a child... that inquisitive ness should remain on till the end. Hunger keeps us going..Feeding slows us.. overfeeding stunts us. There is a need to redefine pleasure and happiness to match with the higher status humans enjoy (of course in their own eyes).
@lianaschill61322 жыл бұрын
Great understanding of „Frustration“ well articulated
@judemaleski48533 жыл бұрын
Spot on!
@Samgurney885 жыл бұрын
I find Tolstoy's analogy for the nature of ideals insightful. Tolstoy observes that if we want to cross a flowing river directly from one bank to another we do not aim merely straight for the other side - in that case the resultant vector, so to speak, would carry us downriver from our target of the bank opposite. Instead, we swim against the current as though we are aiming upriver to a point further along than where we will end up. By analogy, Tolstoy thinks, so must we swim against the stream of human nature by aiming for ideals beyond our reach. Victor Frankl would also sometimes use this analogy. Goethe put much the same point thus: “If you treat an individual as he is, he will remain how he is. But if you treat him as if he were what he ought to be and could be, he will become what he ought to be and could be.” It is interesting that Phillips, quite rightly, diagnoses the inability to endure frustration as the cultural pathology of a society attempting to anesthetise itself with hedonism. Yet at the same time he seems to regard the worst possible failing an ideal could have as that it might not entirely be attainable and might thereby 'humiliate' us. There is clearly some truth to this - we have tormented ourselves in the past, particularly under the influence of the more morbid aspects of Christianity, merely for our inability to cease being ineradicably earthly creatures of the flesh. There is a kind of cruel and sado-masochistic self-humiliation involved in measuring oneself against standards which are altogether inhuman and wildly impossible. Nevertheless, there is something to be said for ideals being things which *ought* to frustrate and challenge us by lying just beyond our reach - it is not obvious that such ideals must necessarily be humiliating. Perhaps what is most humiliating for human beings is the lack of grand ideals for which to strive - for we always fall short of our ideals and it is less degrading to fall short of nobler and more demanding ideals than it is to fall short of ideals that seem as though they should be easy (such as the injunction to 'just be happy'). Maybe I am just saying something similar to Phillips in different words.
@elvisadrianable4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your comment, it was very interesting and insightful!
@Samgurney884 жыл бұрын
@@elvisadrianable Glad you got something out of it :)
@micaelat37343 жыл бұрын
SG. It seems to me he is just saying that we need to have a goal for ourselves that is bigger than ourselves, but realistic and achievable. And if we have a lofty idealistic picture of what we want to be, we set ourselves up for frustration and the humiliation of failing. (And then giving up altogether to improve ourselves; and then blaming ourselves for lack of frustration tolerancy. Or whatever you might call it.)
@Mark-zr8nr Жыл бұрын
Absolutely terrific
@grubernitsch2 жыл бұрын
"For some reason, children are idealized. I think they are idealized, because they are not adults. It's a symptom of real despair in the culture ... idealizing children. What it really says is 'being adult is a disaster. [We say to the child] It's gonna be the best period of your life. [But] being a child is terrible in many ways. Because you're so helpless.'
@aleksandrailic84567 жыл бұрын
Phenomenal simply.
@thepeacetimebookclub30297 жыл бұрын
Fantastic clip
@richsmith20056 жыл бұрын
Phillips is brilliant here. Tyler and Rachel, will you be recording new content soon? I have returned often to your content over the years and would be thrilled to see it broaden and reach a wider audience.
@micaelat37343 жыл бұрын
The question is, how do we begin to do that when the entire society is permeated with market "values"? And even that fails because the products that we buy are not the ones that are intrinsically more valuable, but the ones that are more aggressively, incessantly, cunningly marketed. And then it becomes a runaway train, because the profit enables them to do even more of that.
@darkcowboyhero3 жыл бұрын
We don't, sadly. This train is out of control and only stops when it leaves the tracks. After the wreckage we can more readily influence what comes next I think.
@sanyopoweraid1 Жыл бұрын
@@b_risky Show us a human in nature that's not also regulated in a culture.
@sanyopoweraid1 Жыл бұрын
@@b_risky I see you're just as testy as you were back then.
@gauritiwari48022 жыл бұрын
Insightful
@screensaves Жыл бұрын
xo
@nononouh2 жыл бұрын
5
@Davidhockneyspool Жыл бұрын
In American public schools each child is told they too can one day be the President of the United States. I remember this being stressed so clearly and precisely aimed at each of us as individuals. We all failed to live up to our American birthright of course. Potentialism fed as Potentiality. Is this a prodigal setup ? Or the necessary consequence of an egalitarian republic’s rhetoric?