Turbo Jet Engine 3D Printed In Only Two Parts

[@justanotheranonymous4381]

Small Problem: IT DOESN'T WORK. The video doesn't show a working engine, none of the organisations has published any work in regards to the engine performance or any designs for peer review.

[@g_glop]

they haven't even shown that the proposed geometry works. first build a prototype with as many parts as you want, machined surfaces, bearings and then talk about a print-in-place fluidic bearing tolerances

[@joseenriquetomasperez3912]

Exact.

[@paradiselost9946]

i wonder how those "sintered", or "multicrystalline and slightly porous" blade assemblies will hold up with centrifugal forces when some heat is thrown at them... inconel is all good and well, but arent we also taught about the "advanced technology" where certain turbine blades are "grown" as one "crystal" with no grain interfaces? then theres the whole design aspect of high speed shafts, and rotating assemblies... lessons well documented by say, gustav delaval and charles parsons well over a century ago... human race is getting stupider. the more i look at this "hi tech", the more i start to ask... "whats it all for? whats the end goal here, of civilisation?" and the older i get, the more i tend to want to throw it all away and just watch the grass grow and smell the flowers... as for these types of videos... talk about dumbing it down... can open a book from a century ago and learn something, easily and clearly explained... these days, everythings either primary school level, whilst ignoring vital aspects that merely cause confusion and misconceptions, or its university level with equations, equations, theory, and little to no practical application... and a lot of hard work to undo all those previously mis-learnt principles.

[@TronSAHeroXYZ]

This is very true. Finally a level headed individual.

[@gerardoliveras430]

@@paradiselost9946 You are falling victim to the survival bias. Since we industrialized what you mention has been common to a lesser or bigger degree. Nevertheless after a century only the useful knowledge has survived, thus we have the impression they used to generate only useful knowledge back then.

[@Alorand]

Is there a video somewhere which shows this gas turbine running?

[@tiortedrootsky]

Probably going to be a disposable engine for a missile or something like that.

[@justaweeb9086]

That actually does seem like a cool idea

[@rob6052]

Very interesting. Bearings of course are the critical component to see continued reusability. I was really hoping to see a demonstration of this engine lighting off.

[@danamyrocket]

There are some techniques where “inserts” can be placed into an assembly during the “printing” process.

[@KaiseruSoze]

Yep. I.e., it won't work. 3D printed bearing? Please. (Let's see this engine running.)

[@_Clitoris]

its not a reusable engine

[@rob6052]

@@danamyrocket I understand that. It was clearly not done here. The design relies on a fluid bearing created by fuel in the spinning shaft / housing "bearing" zones. This bearing breaks down as the shaft slows down. At startup, there is no bearing at all, until revs are high enough for a hydrodynamic bearing to form between surfaces. The design may be made such that a break-in period is required to ensure proper mating of surfaces to best support later functionality. Kind of like a Babbit bearing. First uses will be in drones, likely as these appear to be of limited planned lifespan. There is no opportunity to repair either, unless they are made of a few more components. All of this said, you might be able to create from four parts, shaft, "housing" in three parts. With some easy light machining to surfaces, more durable bearings could be placed, thereby making the shaft and bearings, serviceable. This would also afford the opportunity to balance the shaft. As printed, it will definitely not be of precision balance, without fairly extensive machining.

[@anathaetownsend1894]

The intent is to use a "hydrostatic bearing". The engine fuel will be injected into the void between the stator and the rotor, and then circulated into the combustion chamber

[@sixdegrees6434]

$50-$75 K for a turbine of this size? This guy is delusional. You can buy a Jetcat with 50kg thrust for 15K euro. This includes supporting items like pumps, FADEC etc. If these engineers were honest with themselves and their stakeholders there would be fewer project failures

[@daleyoung3566]

PBS engines are around $80k.

[@hu5116]

This is indeed quite amazing. However, I would like to caution the Israeli maestros of this work to beware of being too academic in their approach, if indeed their goal is commercialization. For example, there appears to have been a considerable effort spent on the bearings, and at the end I think I understood the bearing is still deficient. And this is completely understandable, since bearings are a very special technology in and of themselves. With that in mind I’d like to suggest not to look at this as a one print does everything solution. That is really being disingenuous to the other advanced technologies that have to come together to make an engine work. I’m not saying stop working on a two parts one print technology. However, if you want to actually DO something with this today, don’t try to solve ALL the world’s problems in one go. Instead, be prepared to split it up where it makes sense. For example, I don’t think you will be able to get an acceptable bearing in the near future. But I don’t think you have to. Use 3D printing where it is natural to do so,and don’t where it doesn’t. It makes sense where that rats nest maze of burn chambers and mixing labyrinth are. It does not make sense for bearings. It is no sin to break you print into a couple of easy to assemble pieces. I saw a number of ways the prints could be split to allow access for conventional bearing milling and installation. The shaft could be made a 2 piece design for easier assembly if desired. Your 3D parts have addressed the hard parts. Don’t make it harder by not exploiting the ability to also divide the single part into a few assemblable parts with a high benefit.

[@yelectric1893]

Honestly, true : ( Its easy to get carried away and then nothing works. Dont forget to capture what benefit already exists.

[@alexpol108]

The surfaces are quite rough, I wonder if there are parts inside this engine that need to be polished in order to perform as expected... How do they polish them in such unreachable places?

[@kevin_6217]

So where is the fuel pump, electronics, sensors, valves? It's not an engine, it's two assemblies that have been consolidated. It's basically a casting blank that's veeeeery complicated.

[@mitchellstrobbe7779]

It also looks heavy af for how big the compressor and turbine are

[@atrumluminarium]

​@@mitchellstrobbe7779well there's an argument to be made that it can be applied for power grid generation where weight is irrelevant as the company iterates over it. Then move back to aircraft once the weight is brought down enough for it to be viable

[@jfair7050]

Power grid generation, using turbo jet engines?? Do you know how crazy that sounds?.. This really only has one/few time use for unmanned military applications, in my humble opinion..

[@mitchellstrobbe7779]

@@jfair7050 buddy all the fast load pickup units are gas turbines

[@jfair7050]

Hey I'm not going to pretend I know what I'm talking about, but I think a turbo jet engine, is a bit different from a gas turbine? Same principle and all, just like a turbo charger is.. But to my limited knowledge, a turbo jet engine isn't exactly good on fuel, so I don't know what the BTU conversion units would be like (or however you want to measure efficiency) Would have to be a better way? Unless fuel usage, is not a consideration.. Seeing as they are calling them the Israeli MIT, I doubt civilian use cases are high on the list of their priorities. But, I honestly, do not really know what I'm talking about and happy to say, that I was wrong 👍

[@BuceGar]

Impressive. The finish is a little rough for high speed air and compression, and I'm curious to see how it retains it's tolerances under the high heat of combustion. I could see this as an engine for a something that's single use like a ordinance drone or cruise missile.

[@danamyrocket]

I’ve wondered if you could flow abrasive particles through the passages, post printing, to polish surfaces.

[@yelectric1893]

@@danamyrocket that is a thing!

[@tababobi]

Extrude Hone.

[@Shrouded_reaper]

That rotor will rip itself apart. The whole thing needs to be stuck in a cnc machine and then balanced like a turbine blade.

[@craig2809]

Just want to point out that long-term use is not planned. For cruise missile use, it would need a 3-4 hour lifespan max. So this could be a more disposable jet engine.

[@htchtc203]

And why they didn't show the engine running? Well, it sounds too good to be true and so it is.

[@DavidCook42]

how do you effectively get all the un-fuzed powder out of something that complex ?

[@KeithChmielewski]

I had the same thought. Like how do you clean out those internal chambers filled with microlattices?

[@micultimy91]

pressure washing with a solvent could help

[@bobirwin6736]

Very impressive beginning. One of the greatest issues with gas turbines is dealing with rotating high temperature components. Currently, this is addressed with some very advanced materials. It will be interesting to see how 3D printed materials can deal with this. Current aircraft engines require inspection and maintenance. Components are removed, inspected, reworked or discarded when required. Some rework could be completed in the 3D printed design, but it is limited. For short term applications, such as weapon systems, these issues are not as significant. I hope this technology is also used for some non destructive things.

[@brookestephen]

Combine as many of the components as you can that provide fuel flow, cooling, combustion and exhaust, with the most critical combining principle being location & temperature such that the cold fuel flow can cool only in the right places, the warmed fuel flow can then combust in only the right place, and the exhaust only moves in one direction, directed by the cooled exhaust manifold. *AMAZING ENGINEERING*

[@SlinkyD]

I'll take a term from the youngins: Cap, all cap $tr8 caaaaaaaapP 🧢. Y'all fancy so 🎩.

[@kraftwurx_Aviation]

Concept only. This thing would not run. Turbines spin very fast. It has to be perfectly balanced. Printed as an assembly, there is no way to put in bearings. Ceramic bearings are required at this size engine. The turbine wheel is a very poor design. The entire thing would have to be printed in Inconel 625 and heat treated before it could withstand the heat. So many things that would have to change. Still, cool concept and maybe someday something like this will happen. I pri Ted a turbine in 2013 that runs. The average viewer will think this is much closer to reality than it actually is.

[@PeirotheFirescare]

I am a 3d Artist when I look at this I am just amazed there are sooooooooooooo smart people I would love to work on something like this 😮

[@Rebar77_real]

Wow! The military will love these but everyone can benefit from the tech if they can get the cost low enough. (and put them in cars to run on used french fry oil, heh heh)

[@raulkaap]

Everybody talks of the roughness but it makes me think of golfballs and sharkskin.

[@armstrongskyview2810]

Is this an open source project? Has the engine been test run and if so how long can it run? What fuels can it run on? Could it run on hydrogen, what about steam?

[@danieljueleiby914]

Enjoying this so much. Math, 3d, manufacturing, microstructures, designs ohh and the list goes on. I'm still inspired by the heat exchanger for the helicopter oil.

[@thcoura]

When you're facing the camera you don't need goggles 😂

[@yelectric1893]

This is beyond fascinating. Wow doesnt begin to capture the wonder and potential of this. Even if its not great, this is so good for defense as is. Imagine just more accessible turbine period!

[@KToMmi]

Fantastic idea!

[@bryanst.martin7134]

3DP at 120 to 200 thousand RPM? To be efficient, the Vane clearances have to be sub 10 to sub 5 thousandths of an inch. Obviously this was a low resolution repro. But in this rendition there isn't a contact ring that can prevent journal or blade/vane contact. But there is a British Helo upstart that is building everything in house. Composite fuse, rotors, and skids, to in house machining, and 3DP turbine parts in house. He's suggesting 500K pounds UK, for a Turbine powered 4 seater. Looks fantastic. He has my vote for innovator of the year.

[@SaberFox-xo5jf]

Wait does this mean we're one step closer to making the hornet from halo 3?

[@mikeyearwood]

Metal powder and sls is going the way of the dodo, thanks to me.

[@mitofun6967]

only 2 parts?what about the ball bearings?

[@ericseidel4940]

Very interresting desin. Nevertheless the Hachile Heel of this engine is the fluid bearing. I'm sure this one if it ever runs by itself, must require a very high fluid pressure to maintain the bearing. I can see they want to build very simple drones. Another issue in a drone is stong lateral accelerations, inducing brutal movments of the floating rotor. I would rather add two ball bearings at the end of the print, keep 4 or 6 pieces, and create a very strong and reliable engine. (because anyway you need a fuel pump, electronic control and so on...

[@sicstar]

That's a really cool demonstrator! There are some geometries that you just can not machine. period. Plus you are working with only the material you need and not machining 95% away which can be a pain and very expensive in superalloys. Really good job right there! Way to go.

[@pstjets4272]

This is cool stuff..!!

[@MattLitkeRacing]

Normally a bearing surface has a very accurate and smooth surface. I’m sure their printer is better than average but it’s still not going to print bearing grade surfaces

[@dejupp]

bearings? test run?

[@artysanmobile]

I’m as fascinated as anyone about 3D printing so I would’ve watched this without the baiting. It is not a working engine, which is no problem for me. It is a thought exercise and model for future development. Could you not have expressed that in your video’s title?

[@lylestavast7652]

pretty rough surfaces isn't ? for flow reasons. Have they tested it in anything that , say generates power (electricity) - and how does the same fuel in/electricity out compare to a traditionally built one ? lifetime hours before failure ? no need to rebuilt - is it just unit swap ? Interesting options !

[@falcofranz5005]

If surface roughness is an issue, it could be polished by abrasive flow machining.

[@kurtisb100]

This is a very interesting concept; but it’s an engine that will have a very narrow thrust range. There’s no air management systems on this; no guide vanes or bleed air controllers. This engine will have the same problem as the jet engines of the 1940s. This is a one way engine; so if you’re powering a missile then great. But if you want to land the airplane this would be attached to you’re going to have a problem. Even an industrial turbine needs to have modulating power output in 99% of applications.

[@camiloolartevideos]

wtf! that's amazing

[@falcosparverius1]

Just add bump foil air bearings patented by Capstone Turbine.

[@bill6255]

How much did that non-working prototype cost to print? edit: he said $10k to $15K if you own the printer

[@jonathanescalada1584]

Cool

[@benjaminschaefer6757]

Perhaps bearing could be placed during the additive process.

[@jimmybusby]

aren't they saying the fuel is the bearing?

[@charlesspringer4709]

Not an engine till it runs.

[@burnologist229]

Bro I've been designing a 3d printed turbojet for 4 months now interesting to see their designs. BUT their designs are wayyy too complicated geometrically, like how are you ever going to fix the turbine wheel if it chips. My design it based off the KJ66, Gr180. My engine is composed of just 8 parts and cost, around 500$, 350 being the cheapest version.

[@alexlo7708]

Its problem is common jet engine uses different material between cold and hot part.

[@sweetgumnyc7794]

it will be heavy. You will need to print the entire engine in inconel but the entire engine doesnt have to be inconel. many parts can be aluminum that are not in the hot zone. This will make the engine twice as heavy as it has to be . Human labor is the cheapest part of the equation. This doesnt really solve anything

[@josephchristman578]

At 10:58 "PESSURE DISTRIBUTION"

[@makskk6spm275]

It seems these people don't even understand what a jet engine is

[@inferno2502]

Does it work ? I see no working engine .

[@ThomasHaberkorn]

Quite impressive, however, use bearings man

[@Phil-D83]

Could it power a drone?

[@Shegal1535]

Printed pre-assembled Soooooo There's no great way to balance the turbine assembly that needs to turn 10's of thousands of RPMs? All printed from the Same Alloy (likely high nickel content or exotics like Ti, HastX or Inco) .007" gap would be big even for the Crank-Rod interface in a reciprocating engine. During spool up, pre ignition, fuel pressure will be lowest so bearing is in most compromised state, probably would friction weld the rotating assy to the housing before it bulges from the over fueled hot start. *WhooooooOOOOOOsh BRICK*

[@O-RoD]

Simplified at 3 times the price.

[@giveitatryguy6784]

I don't think theres is enough grounds to justify material change 🤷 its picking a product already in existence and reinventing the jet turbo when really it's another style at best the consept remains the same 🤔 plus I would rather fork out money to repair a compressor then to replace the whole unit? If the changes don't add efficiency or some what extra power than normal then why waste energy & time reinventing & put the time & energy into improving or finding the key to higher power etc so put it in the market let it prove what it portrayes then it's a cool style 👌

[@cmtetaboaco]

No bearings? Print in place bearings not been ceramic, not serviceable? It’s good for suicide drones only!

[@YourArmsGone]

show it running.

[@armstrongskyview2810]

Is this just a concept to gain VC investment

[@JamesCopeland-i1j]

Won't work. Plain and simple. There's simply not enough conversion area to produce reasonable output. You could resolve the bearing issue, and build it from insanely expensive zirconia... it still won't work. It needs to be longer and a larger diameter. The output volume needs to be larger. The surface area for power conversion needs to SIGNIFICANTLY larger.

[@__--JY-Moe--__]

💪👍👍🍌wow! love the discussion! really helped me grasp a little part of all that stuff involved!! good luck ya'll... much green'r part!! imagine.. 20:2 love it.. would make a super crazy documentary!!🐝

[@arkbirdarcher19]

p.o.c. is fine.

[@mueshen9861]

awesome, now service it like compressor blades on real jet are served, each by each, balancing, machining and refining to a good surface finish. oh, one blade broke due to debree? too bad, replace whole assembly. design for the sake of design. now if you were to 3d print slightly oversized conventional parts, now thats usable, now that is helpfull to reduce waste after you machine it to spec. not that monstrocity. sorry but this is..cool but not what is needed.

[@علوان-م7ف]

all of this is a poolshit. You have to show up this engine in work

[@mitofun6967]

the design is crap! tha air flop path is so long! omg who designed it- even if you will manage to install the ball bearings in this cylinder- it will not work as the air flow is so discusting! the best way for the air is the straight! in order to increase the fuel flow you must to use compressor(s) so from my distant this box does not work!

[@JoeyBlogs007]

Not operationally feasible. Surely.

[@Jonno2020]

can this metal tolerate the temps.

[@BuceGar]

It might work in one-off use case scenarios, like a cruise missile or ordnance drone.

[@danamyrocket]

@@Jonno2020inconel is used in high temp applications

[@DanFrederiksen]

@@Jonno2020 inconel is used in jet engines, it works for designs with moderate compression, say up to 10bar. above that the turbine blades need cooling ducts to survive.

[@yelectric1893]

The criticism is warranted but it's not constructive. I don't mean this as an insult, but as a similar observation; you're lame as hell! I'm sure you do have things to say, and I am intrigued from what could come of your discussion. What they aspire to do, and their progress, is certainly something. Let them cook. See how it goes. Even if it kind of sucks, its definitely something to build off of . Imagine what it could be. This is a good burning-money-pit at the very minimum. Give cool things a chance!

[@SuperYellowsubmarin]

I'm all in for built-in heat echangers, complex functional integration, and pushing the exercise as far as conceptually possible. But really, an engine rotating at 50,000rpm with an unbalanced rotor which bearing surfaces are unmachined, and zero way to inspect before assembly ? Even supposing this is a throaway engine for one time use drones, to me that's unrealistic.

[@cybair9341]

Channels have to be integrated into the design in order to allow the excess powder to be removed in post-processing. How is that done ?

[@supremecommander2398]

If you take a close look on those schematics of the engine, you will notice, that there is no cavity in that engine that is not either part of the air or fuel flow. so no extra channels necessary, because they are already all connected.

[@kaustavkapur5532]

How do you insure high tolerances for parts that were 3d printed which have pretty poor tolerances.

[@nickbell3546]

ALL 3d prints must have the critical surfaces machined, e.g. mating surfaces, sealing surfaces, datum/assembly surfaces, dowel pin holes, threaded holes, and bearing seats. However, most surfaces do not need tight 5-axis tolerances and can get by with a 0.030" surface profile that printing provides.

[@jasongooden917]

They need to make the outer shell 2 parts so the jet can have maintenance

[@BuceGar]

Depends on what it's going in. Reuse and efficiency is probably not the strength of this design.

[@danamyrocket]

Yeah, no. No serviceable parts.

[@riccello]

Why service it if you can just pribt a new one?

[@Gamyrc]

Mainly just proof of concept of the extremes they can go to. Production would be more like you said serviceable. But, I can see a model that is not serviceable being used on attack drones as they could be single use and the engine would be destroyed anyway. Space X is using these kinds of designs on their new Raptor engines. Its crazy small/efficient for the power it puts out.

[@jasongooden917]

Don't Care about the jet but I could use that printer

[@blackturbine]

One engine, two parts and whole lot of bs. It's same as saying you made perpetual motion machine that will change the world, but you have no data or any footage of it running and just slap a label "proof of concept" and seeing how expensive SLS is even today it's still more economical and more reliable to make jet engines out of machined parts that you can easily replace if they break.

[@danielblackburn4626]

Looks like a gimmick. Cool concept but some impractical aspects. Good exercise, but I’d be surprised if it would fly in present form. Introduction to some future possibilities…

[@leanmixture]

Very nice sculpture. It looks like a jet engine. 😂

[@scott1099]

GE Siemens and Mitsubishi will be all over that

[@MrBurtonf]

“2 pieces except one piece has been divided in half.” THATS 3 PIECES! Another piece would be a bearing… I am sure there would be more than one of those in a working model. Also you have to add fuel so there’s probably a fuel pump and some tubing to deliver the fuel to some kind of injector. Don’t forget the clamps and the mounts and all the pieces that attach all of this together. Wait… There’s more! And there’s way more than two pieces. You can’t reduce a jet turbine down to just two pieces no matter how you spin it!

[@ThomasBarone]

Exactly 💯!!

[@brookestephen]

could magnetism along the rotor be used to stabilize it's rotation without bearings? It would aid the fuel flow to steady it.

[@gammafoxlore2981]

No.... the operation the turbine would bring the metal to it's curie temperature.

[@Florreking]

cool flower pot

[@krugtech]

it'll never run. if they do get it to run, I bet it won't look anything like this when they do. They're severely compromising the design to be able to print it with minimum parts and there's really no need to keep the parts count that low.

[@ВладимирГрачев-ы2и]

Assuming bearing problem somehow got solved, I would think that turbine + compressor assembly is not balanced enough for the RPM ranges this engine needs. What about heat treatment? I doubt that geometry that complicated could be heat treated as a single piece.

[@riccello]

This all sounds very gimmicky. The rough surface of the blades is going to create a lot of turbulence. Single stage radial compressor will always be inferior to axial setup. Not that this can't be changed, but at this stage this proves nothing.

[@TheNavalAviator]

So where's the test run footage? Bro, it could have been a scramjet, that would have been possible at least and in demand.

[@ofergani1985]

No comment - this is a poor marketing exercise that is only harming the industry ;)

[@K0T3J1]

So does it work?

[@LukeTube007]

Found this video extremely dry and boring… it's a shame they could not appeared to speaking with actual testing functions it's actually printed to do. Yes, it was 3-D printed, but beyond that I didn't really get anything intellectual video and I did turn it off at 12 minutes.

[@leebonney2773]

So let us ponder some key elements of a video with real content:- Does the concept work? In this case it's a dressed up joke, 200 microns bearing clearance, or 0.2mm plus crap surface finish, plus same materials. You don't need to go to MIT to know that can't work. Is the concept new? Well printing two components together with a clearance is certainly not a new idea. Is the concept commercially viable? Not a chance, the 15K $ quoted is the mf cost with no fuel/ignition/electronics etc. The 50K present cost has already been questioned, mf companies on average need to at least double or triple material costs to cover overheads & make profit. So I'm sure these guys are really clever, but possibly misguided/delusional? As for the channel, great engaging title, well presented, but little more than clickbait.

[@bradarsenault6984]

"bearing journal" 😂 Where's the lube system for these "bearings"? That's a complex LAMP'd structure with a terribly inefficient gas path design and there is no way that things could function without more pieces and extensive machining. Even then, performance would be dismal if it even stayed running. I have doubts about that turbine design being structurally sufficient for use. There are actual small jets that are almost completely LAMP'ed systems, with only bearings being added and some machining of the bearing pilots. The perform poorly and have reliability issues

[@mikhailjairnisbett441]

There's no way they could just 3d print a normal (RC turbine-type) shell with the combustion chamber, outside surfaces, etc and stick in a machined compressor, main shaft, and turbine with some bearings? seems like it'd be a more reasonable approach.

[@williamelewis464]

This is starting to feel very, propaganda like, like oil company level propaganda, Big Tobacco level propaganda…might be the show or the two people who are speaking as it’s the first time ever seeing it, it’s very infomercial in its approach and appeal, like I expect a 1-900 sex talk commercial to come on right after this

[@paulywalter1]

Two parts 😂 don't forget you might need a starter, a fuel pump some sort of fuel control, injectors, ignitors😂 , oil system maybe a oil filter to get the all that dust out, this is obviously a company that has no idea how a turbine engine even works 😂 o yes might want to know what the engine speed is. Three D printed bearings 😂, go back to engineering school 😂

[@flymachine]

No bearings? No valves, nozzles, no maintenance ports?? How do you Borescope inspect this? I don’t believe I will ever see this in production aviation ever. A cool sci-fi concept and some of the ideas there can be developed but it should not be presented as a practical solution.

[@vobchopper]

An interesting academic exercise, but only that, turbochargers used one piece cast fans 35 years ago, the materials are superalloys don't think they'll be able to print many of those

[@bdkw1]

This is am interesting project but totally useless in the real world. It will need machined bearings that are preferably replaceable. Otherwise it's a one and done motor that is not rebuildable. Simple does not always equate to better.

[@mmaxsonify]

Why not be a little bit more precise what I'm saying is put a little bit more attention to the beauty of it being very smooth unless attention to putting your emblems embedded in the sides of the rotor fluid dynamics aren't doing their job if they're letting you put their emblems all over the outside of the rotor

[@v-koma-li-izpadash-sq6893]

IT DOESN'T WORK, there is no any bearings yet. This is only to represent CAD Skills to someone :D

[@VasiliyTulun]

Выглядит интересно, но как этот двигатель может стартовать? Газодинамический подшипник это интересно, но плохо работает на старте. Идеально вырастить такую массивную вращающуюся деталь внутри... А как это можно отбалансировать? Камера сгорания занимает очень большой объем и содержит очень много препятствий для газовых потоков в виде литейных поддержек - это очень важно - чем выше скорость истечения газов из камеры сгорания, тем лучше работает двигатель. Здесь это невозможно. Ещё важный момент - качество поверхностей - все детали ГТД должны быть гладкими, а лучше полированными. Это скорее пневматический тормоз, чем газотурбинный двигатель 😊

[@ryank7961]

Looks pretty ..Lets see it run..otherwise it's a concept

[@shinta_fx]

So why does this remind me of Norwell the Weasel? I found the original voice talent

[@AugustusTitus]

There are four lights. There are three pieces. What is this, a Cardassian outpost?

[@kinzieconrad105]

Doesn't work and also you must be able to take it apart so you can service it!

[@curtisnewton895]

all this overacting...this is yet another scam

[@giovanefortuna]

Imprimir é facil o dificil é funcionar 😂

[@michaelhill4015]

I wonder how small you could print this.

[@SFSALi]

😐💀