Adi Shankaracharya Vedant Sutra Exposed | Advait Vedanta Exposed

[@bhakti_time899]

Hare Krishna Prabhu ji aapke is tarah Mayavad khandan dekhkar mujhe bhakti Siddhant Saraswati Thakur Prabhu pad ji ki yad a gai jab vah bola karte the to sab Mayawati chup ho jaate tha meri aapse koti koti prathna hai is adharmi ka prashnon ka Uttar aap dijiye

[@Ajaysharmavrindavan]

Wake up vaisnavas please wake up, go outside and preach vaisnava philosophy. Such a Demonic philosophy of Mayavad or advaitvad shouldn't exist in the sanatana dharma.

[@Sankhyame]

Instead of preaching against Advaita, appeal them to destroy Islam and Christianity, which has historically damaged Santana Dharma the most.

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Outside enemies are less impactful, inside enemies are more destructive. An enemy disguised as friend is more dangerous than an enemy who openly admits itself not part of Sanatana Dharma. There is no appeal to the Krishna Aparadhis. We are followers of Sripad Madhvacharya, incarnation of Bheemsen, who destroyed the 100 Kauravas, same mood will be seen while destruction of Mayavad. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@UpadhyaySujit]

​​@@beingthespiritsoul तुम पता दो अपना... फिर पता चलेगा कि तुम्हें शास्त्रों का कितना बोध है! तुम्हें संस्कृत उच्चारण तो आता नहीं... और सीधे श्री माध्वाचार्य और श्री आद्यशंकराचार्य की बातें करने चले हो! भाण्ड नल्ले! अपना सम्पर्क सूत्र और पता बता... मैं आता हूँ अकेले निहत्था फिर देखते हैं कितना जानते हो! जो भी चर्चा होगी on record होगी! हिम्मत है तो... अपने बाप के हो और माँ का दूध है रक्त में तो बताओ पता! वर्ना भाण्ड प्रलाप बंद करो!

[@anandsharmavasisht3205]

There are no enemies. Best philosophy sustains itself. No need to fight internally and destroy. Advaita is a lofty pinnacle that a few can reach. Hence our great acharyas have devised path for everyone with various inclinations and capabilities. They are all great. They are all extremely merciful. Best test of strength of philosophy is how convinced, calm and benefited one is after adopting that. Spirit of this kind of fighting itself is avidya, thinking i have better knowledge than others. 🙏

[@UpadhyaySujit]

@@beingthespiritsoul 🤣 जुगनू (तथाकथित वैष्णव ISKCON) सूर्य(श्रीमदाद्य शंकराचार्य) को प्रकाश(वेदादि शास्त्र का अर्थ) दिखा रहा है! शंकर का खंडन वेदों,वेदांगों,उपनिषदों, रामायण-महाभारतादि इतिहास और भागवतादि पुराणों का ही खंडन है! जो ग्रंथों का गुरूमुख से स्वाध्याय कर लेता है वो स्वप्न में भी शंकर का खंडन नहीं कर सकता, वैसे उल्लू तो सूर्य को उलाहना देते ही हैं कि उसमें तेज/प्रकाश नहीं है! जय जय शंकर हर हर हर शंकर सबका मंगल हो..! जय शम्भो नारायण 👏🏻 हर हर महादेव 🚩🚩🚩

[@ujjawaldhar5646]

Vaishnav Dharma sada vijayate 🚩

[@anandsharmavasisht3205]

Absolute mis-representation of Shri Shankaracharya 's sutra bhasya. Please to not misguide people with half baked knowledge. Shankaracharya himself has said 1.1.1.2: किंलक्षणं पुनस्तद्ब्रह्मेत्यत आह भगवान्सूत्रकारः and at the end in 4.4.22 इत्यतः उत्तरं भगवान्बादरायण आचार्यः पठति . Please refer to anvaya and vyatireka aspects of the sutra technically. It is a gem of interpretation of both sutras and Taittireeya.

[@chantdanceadvance4700]

Lagta hai aap bhi Mawayadi hai

[@Akashmanavv]

Bhai mayawadi nhi advaitwadi hai . Tum log bas nachte raho satya mat janna 😂😂😂​@@chantdanceadvance4700

[@anandsharmavasisht3205]

Hum ved vaadi hain. Ved me jo likha hain usi ko mante hain. Misinterpretation bilkul nahi mante bas. 🙏

[@chantdanceadvance4700]

@@anandsharmavasisht3205 Jo vyakti jeev aur bhrahm ko ek hi maanta hai usko mayawadi kehte hai . Aur jo vyakti jeev ko Brahm ka das sweekar karta hai, usko vaishnav kehte hai . Ab aap dekh lijiye aap kya mante hai .

[@anandsharmavasisht3205]

Namaste ji, this definition of mayavad is incorrect and there there is no shruti pramana for this definition. Mayavad means that which considers maya as supreme. Vedas proclaim that supreme entity is brahman and not maya, which all of us have to agree. Lord Krishna is our authority and he says he is supreme. And everyone knows Jeev, and brahma are different when you are comparing at gross body level, why Vedas have to tell us this? Vedas are saying something deeper, if there is one entity Brahman alone as per shruti "ekameva adviteeyam brahma", how can anything be different from Brahman? Is jeev so powerful to have a separate existence? All vedic saints, maharishis, devotees like Prahlad and purana support this. There are shruti and bhagavata purana vakyas supporting this as well. I can humbly share if needed. 🙏🏻

[@Radhika-o3u]

Another Banger 🔥🌝

[@Sachinandanadas]

Hare Krishna ❤

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna ♥️

[@fusecharger9563]

You may not know but shankaracharya was shiva himself. Chaitanya mahaprabhu himself and all the aacharyas accepted it. Do you think Shiva can make a mistake ? Do you think there is fallacy in the words of mahadev ?

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. There is a fallacy that' why all other commentators of Vedant Sutras point out and Sri Shankaracharya himself corrects Srila Vyas Deva (Bhagwan himself) in his Vedant Sutras commentary. Sri Padma Puran confirms that Lord Vishnu instructed Lord Shiv to spread Tamas Sastras to bewilder the demons (present day Advaitians) of Kali Yuga with Hidden Buddh Scriptures and that's why Sripad Vallabhacharya (one who himself comes in Lord Shiva sampradaya) confirms it in his Vedant Sutras commentary. What more confirmation you want ? Hare Krishna 🚩

[@fusecharger9563]

@@beingthespiritsoul Thank you prabhuji. Vallabhacharya comes in rudra sampradaya so what he is saying must not be wrong but just see here. In the yoga vasishta , vasishta explain advait vaad to shri rama. So advait existed in treta yug much much before shankaracharya too. Also vasishta is big pandit in both material science and spiritual science so he is very correct

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. Vashistha is just a Rishi.... He is not an Acharya... Jamini was also a Rishi but his Karma Kanda was thrashed by Srila Vyasdeva in Vedant Sutras... Similarly Advait Vaad was thrased by Srila Vyasdeva and therefore Vashistha opinion just like Jamini doesn't matter much... Opinion of Sripad Vallabhacharya and other Vaishnava Acharyas including Srila Vyasdeva who is Lord Narayana himself is of utmost importance than any Rishi. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@fusecharger9563]

@@beingthespiritsoul Prabhuji , you seem to misunderstand. I respect srila prabhupada immensely. He was one of the greatest mahapurusha aacharya's in kali yuga by making people who had no conception of god dance with joy in harinam sankirtan, I have also read about how Narada muni himself came to visit prabhupad ji and how krishna bhagavaan himself gave him kadamba flower garland. He was without a doubt great. But prahbuji , vasishta is one of the sapta rishi you know ? Directly born from brahma himself ! Do you understand the position of vasishta ?In the vasishta yoga shaastra he explains brahmavaad so beautifully to shri ramachandra. All the paths lead to same place Krishna himself says in Gita "In whatever way men approach Me, I come to them. Men everywhere follow My path” (4:11) Ramanujacharya ( who is Ananta shesha he cannot make mistake ) " एकं सव्दिप्रा बहुधा वदन्ति। " This prooves all paths , mayavaad , tantra , bhakti all these paths lead to krishna . so let us not fight which path is wrong or right because krishna himself has given us that all paths lead to him Hare krishna!

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. Being a saptrishi does not make any difference. Gautam was also a Saptrishi Rishi still Nyaya Sastra's conclusions are not above Vedanta. You have to understand the difference between a Rishi and Lord himself then you will realise what I am speaking. Not all paths lead to him. In Bhagavad Gita, 17th Chapter, Lord defines three types of faith... Different faiths have different results. Mayavadis are Krishna Apradhis as per Bhagavad Gita 16.8. Hare Krishna 🙏

[@Himanshu_IIT_R]

Dho dala call of adharma ko😂😂

[@chantdanceadvance4700]

This really‼️ Needs Attention ‼️ Advait siddhant kehta hai sab ek hai. One without a second. Monoism philosophy maanta hai. Sab kuch Brahm hai. Brahm ke alawa kuch dusra hai hi nahi . Toh us hisab se toh Allah , Jesus Christ , Haivaan , Haivaan ke guruji , Ramji , Krishna ji , Durga ji , Ganesh ji, Shiv ji, Shankaracharya ji etc etc sab ek hi hai ?? Toh vaicharik aur Siddhantik dharatal par Krishna aur Allah ek hue ya nahi ??? Yadi Inka uttar hai Nahi toh inka advait galat siddh ho jayega aur uska automatically khandan ho gaya

[@chantdanceadvance4700]

@@AbhiKumar-do3rr Nope. I don't accept or reject anything without fully understanding it. Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, who is Krishna himself, thrashed Advaita, which was incomplete in itself and established Achintya bhedabhed tatva, which means Only Qualitatively Jeeva and brahman is one, but on Quantitative basis there is difference. Jeevan cannot do creation of multitude of universes, Jeeva is never independent and always subordinate to Parabrahman , Jeeva cannot be omnipresent like Krishna, who is situated in everyone's heart and knows the whereabouts of everyone, jeeva cannot do this . These things are missing in Advaita. It simply equates Jeeva and brahman as one, without a difference. That's why it was incomplete and also spiritually dangerous. So, i follow the footsteps of Sri Chaitanya mahaprabhu.

[@anandsharmavasisht3205]

Your conclusion of Advaita is laughable at best. This is not the purport of advaita from any angle. Poor analysis.

[@chantdanceadvance4700]

@@anandsharmavasisht3205 Similarly we laugh at the concept of Brahman and jeeva being placed on the same level 🤣😆😂

[@chantdanceadvance4700]

भ्रम और ब्रह्म में अंतर है न प्रभुजी।

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Brahman and Brahma Ji me antar hai Prabhu. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@chantdanceadvance4700]

@@beingthespiritsoul Wo Keshavanand prji ब्रह्म को भ्रम भ्रम kehte hai na Prabhu, isliye comment Kiya .

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Brahm bolte hai wo.... Jada clarity ke liye me Brahman bolta hu... Baat ek hi hai. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@markhenry808]

मेरी विनती है कृपया शंकराचार्य जी पर गलत बात मत करिए बहुत दुख होता है आप अपना प्रचार करिए परंतु जिससे हिंदुओं की भावनाएं आहत होती है वो कार्य मत करिए।

[@beingthespiritsoul]

हरे कृष्णा. मुझे भी दुख होता है जब मैं पढ़ता हूं कि आदि शंकराचार्य ने श्रील व्यासदेव के लिए अपशब्द कहे। आदि शंकराचार्य अपने दर्शन का विज्ञापन कर सकते थे लेकिन उन्होंने अपने दर्शन को स्थापित करने के लिए श्रील व्यासदेव के वेदांत सूत्रों का उपयोग क्यों किया और साथ ही यह कहा कि श्रील व्यासदेव के सूत्र गलत हैं? क्या आदि शंकराचार्य का यह आचरण ग़लत नहीं है? हरे कृष्णा 🚩

[@markhenry808]

देखिए मैं यहां बहस में नहीं पड़ने आया हूं ना मुझे संस्कृत भाषा अच्छी तरह से आती है और न मैंने ६ षड शास्त्र भी नहीं पढ़े है।भगवद गीता जी। का अध्ययन आवश्यक करता हूं।जो गहराई में जाएगा उसे अपने आप पता लग जायेगा दुनिया में एक सत्ता है वह भगवान ही है उसके सिवा और कुछ नहीं।जब वो केवल एक है तो दो की बात ही नहीं है। हरे कृष्णा।

[@beingthespiritsoul]

हरे कृष्णा। हम यह भी कहते हैं कि ईश्वर एक व्यक्तित्व है। द्वैत से तात्पर्य यह है कि एक जीव और एक ईश्वर है और दोनों में अंतर है। द्वैत से हमारा तात्पर्य यह नहीं है कि संसार में दो सर्वोच्च शक्तियाँ हैं। इस प्रकार हम आपकी बात से सहमत हैं। श्रीपाद आदि शंकराचार्य कहते हैं कि जीव स्वयं ईश्वर हैं या कोई जीव नहीं है, केवल ईश्वर का अस्तित्व है। यह मूर्खतापूर्ण दर्शन लगता है क्योंकि हम सभी देखते हैं कि इस दुनिया में जीव मौजूद हैं। जीव की उपस्थिति संसार की मूलभूत वास्तविकता है और यह कोई भ्रम नहीं है। इस भाग में हम आपसे भिन्न हैं या मुझे लगता है कि आप आदि शंकराचार्य के दर्शन के बारे में नहीं जानते होंगे या आपको अद्वैत दर्शन के बारे में गलत समझ होगी। इसलिए मैंने आपको यह समझाने की कोशिश की कि जब हम द्वैत कहते हैं तो हमारा क्या मतलब होता है और जब हम अद्वैत कहते हैं तो हमारा क्या मतलब होता है। मुझे आशा है कि अब आप श्री माधवाचार्य के द्वैत दर्शन या श्री चैतन्य महाप्रभु के अचिंत्य भेद अभेद दर्शन का पालन करना शुरू कर देंगे और आप श्री शंकराचार्य के मूर्खतापूर्ण दर्शन की उपेक्षा करेंगे। हरे कृष्ण 🚩

[@notthatnotthat5859]

Kyu Vaishnava Hindu nahi hai kya? Hamare acharya log ko ulta seedha bologe, hum chup rahenge kya?

[@apsnapsn4700]

4:49, 😂 Bro was literally scared of Shripaada Madhvacharya...Ye darr achha h.. What a great man he is.., Iskcon who follow their guru ("Madhvacharya ka ashraya lelete h") is problematic, but Shripaada Shankaracarya who rejected the verdict of his Guru is apparently allright. This man also said that Iskcon follow Madhvacharya and then contradicted himself when he said that iskcon follow different philosophy. Afterall what can we expect from an ignorant. Bro considers that iskcon don’t follow dvaitwaad, which ofcourse is untrue. Infact one of the names of Iskcon's philosophy is shudha dvaitwaad.

[@shridharaithal1433]

Those who do not have any direct experience of oneness, can never understand anything. Go ahead believe in your God, the heaven, hell and so on.... you will keep coming and going until you really realize who the hell you really are? I guess ignorance is bliss they say!

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. Ignorance is bliss ! That's true... Therefore when it was written by Srila Vyasdeva (Bhagwan himself) that Supreme Brahman is blissful, Sripad Adi Shankaracharya chooses to be ignorant and wrote in his commentary that Brahman can't be blissful. I mean why would you you follow a philosophy which says at the end you will never feel blissful as Brahman itself is not blissful... Why would you love a concept of liberation which says you will be mute at the end of your liberation. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@shridharaithal1433]

@@beingthespiritsoul So you accept that yours is a concept, without any concrete reality for all whether they are the followers of your group. All are mere concepts or ideations if not valid in every case for all without any difference. Only truth as it is which animates you, me and every other being living and non living every where must be realized while living as pointed out by great ACArya as propounded by VEdaVyAsa ACArya.

[@beingthespiritsoul]

@shridharaithal1433 Hare Krishna. What Srila Vyasdeva propounded has been accepted by our Acharyas as it is. Sri Shankaracharya on the other hand rejected Srila Vyasdeva. When I used the word concept, I wanted to say that our process is scientific i.e. which has been followed by generations and they have got the result. Word jugglery is not our business. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@venkateshprabhu7027]

See for yourself RAMA SITA in JATAKA TALES. Story no 100. Page 259 . The character Rama says ' impermanance of things '

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. Jataka Tales is not an authority for us. We will not even check, what is written there. If you want to know about Lord Ram then do study Valamki Ramayana. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@markhenry808]

दैवी ह्येषा गुणमयी मम माया दुरत्यया । मामेव ये प्रपद्यन्ते मायामेतां तरन्ति ते ॥७.14॥ 7.14: प्रकति के तीन गुणों से युक्त मेरी दैवीय शक्ति माया से पार पाना अत्यंत कठिन है किन्तु जो मेरे शरणागत हो जाते हैं, वे इसे सरलता से पार कर जाते है।माया शब्द भगवद गीता जी में है। द्वैत और अद्वैत अलग नहीं हैं।दिन में हम द्वैत में होते है जब हम रात को सो जाते हैं तो अद्वैत में पहुंच जाते है।द्वैत से गुजर कर अद्वैत में जाना होता है लड़ने की कोई बात नहीं है।

[@beingthespiritsoul]

हरे कृष्णा। किसने कहा कि दिन में हम द्वैत में होते हैं लेकिन रात में हम अद्वैत में स्थित होते हैं? क्या इसका कोई शास्त्र प्रमाण है? हरे कृष्णा 🚩

[@notthatnotthat5859]

Chal be....Dvaita rejected your Advaita philosophy. There is no reconciliation. You want to assimilate and give a lower position to other philosophies. We won't let it happen

[@apsnapsn4700]

@@markhenry808 So kindly tell the dreams of enemies of our nation, that way you can help our military a lot by exposing the plans of any potential threat to our nation. You went into the state of Advaita, thus it's a piece of cake for you :)

[@Sanatandharm-n7g]

Ek baat btaye kabhi shankrachrya ji ne Vaishnavism ka khandan kiya kiya?? Unhone toh khud bhagwan krishna par stotra likhe the..voh khud kehte the bhaj govindam ...tumhara kya bigada unhone????..apne sanatan dharm ke achrya ka apman karte ho.. adi Shankara ne hindu dharm ki raksha ki aur bhai bhagwan shankrachrya ne khud bhagwan krishna ji,jaganath ji par stotra likhe the..samje..jawab dijiyega..aur dusari baat shankrachrya ji kabhi haj par nahi ge..mene unki puri history padi hai voh kitab kisi muslim ne likhi aur aise bhi muslim hindu ko badnam karne ki sajish karta hai ..iske alawa koi paka proof dikhao ki shankrachrya gaye the jis jagah ka tumhne jikar kiya tha .. ...shankrachrya 2500 saal pehle aaye the aur yeh bekar muslim 1200 saal pehle..toh kaha se shankrachrya uss jagah ??.jai shree Sita Ram 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩.. sanatan dharm ki Jai 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🕉️🕉️🕉️🕉️..

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Adi Shankaracharya ne Bhagwan Narayana dwara kahe Panchatantra ka khandan Kiya hai and usse pramanik granth nahi mana hai. Adi Shankaracharya ne kaha ki Vasudev, Sankarshan, Aniruddha and Pradyuman Bhagwan ek saath nahi ho sakte. Aur bhi bohot si baate hai. Adi Shankaracharya Vaishnavism ka virodh bahut jada kiya hai. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@venkateshprabhu7027]

This garlands are of no use. Buddha wrote Vajrachedika Sutra or Diamond Sutra 530 BC. Ramayana Mahabharata and Bhagavad Gita and Upanishads were written 1000 years after wards.

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. Buddha appeared in starting of Kali Yuga which is around 500-600 or some more years before. Ramayana, Mahabharat happened in Treta Yuga and in Dwapar Yuga which is much before the appearance of Lord Buddha. Buddhism is nothing but atheism. It has been soundly refuted by our Vaishnav Acharyas. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@venkateshprabhu7027]

All numbers are wrong 😂

[@venkateshprabhu7027]

All history I am telling You are talking nonsense 🤣

[@venkateshprabhu7027]

Your yugas are no use. Buddha time I can tell the dates. Hindu calendars are no use. Chanakya, Chandragupta, Ashok All Ramayana Mahabharata and Bhagavad Gita and Upanishads 500 AD.

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Your comments are no use. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@shivampandit_45]

Mai chahta hun ki tum mujhe dikhao vedant sutra per shankar bhasya jaha pe Shankaracharya ne reject kiya ho . Unhone keval satya hi kaha hai Upanishads ka reference deke. Even Gita Press ke version mein bhi yahi baat likhi hui hai. Toh tum sab isckon walo intentionally Shankaracharya ji ko badnaam mat karo. Aur ek baat dikhao ki unhone vyaas dev ji ka khandan kiya ho

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. Re-watch the video from @22:31, evidence from Adi Shankaracharya Bhasya has already been given for your reference. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@AbdulRashid-gv4kv]

Prabhu ji naryan astra channel aapko expose kar rha hai uska reply kijiye ❤

[@appleman8251]

Prabhuji unhone hari har bhed per ek nayi video banaye hai.usska bhi khandan kijiye.

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. Dandwat Pranam. Please watch the full video till end... I have explained which videos you need to watch which are already in my channel against Hari- Har Abhed. I am putting those videos for your reference:- 1. Hari - Har Abhed Maha Khandanam from Adi Shankaracharya's Vedant Sutras Bhasya :- kzbin.info/www/bejne/eX-qiaSLmKuCndksi=U2yhJDjc65H0a1L9 2. Satvik- Rajasik- Tamsik Puran Classification:- kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z16xfqGwp51jaqMsi=qUw8nsLrYxwxIdLD 3. Adi- Shankaracharya (A Hidden Vaishnava) :- kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXysmKSKh8x2iK8si=PENkjj9Wwm0_2nTz 4. Present day Shankaracharya recommending worship of Lord Vishnu over Lord Shiv from Adi Shankaracharya's works :- kzbin.infocqdv6au3y3Q?si=78mGvqTDE7FT9UGj These and others videos are enough to shut the mouth of any Sadak Chaap Advaitaian. Your Aspiring Servant, Hare Krishna 🚩 .

[@appleman8251]

@@beingthespiritsoul prabhuji kabhi kabhi lagta hai kab koi vaishnav scholar se unki amne samne sastrath ho aur unke vakya chaturai ka annt ho 😔 Hare krishna.

[@krsnadasa400]

Their propaganda has been refuted in this video, by the way. kzbin.info/www/bejne/h6K1aH2ZgMqobNk

[@kapil-nq5rl]

Hare Krishna prabhuji dandwat pranam

[@Indrakshmisanyal]

एक जीव एक ब्रह्म कहावत सूरदास झगड़ो अज्ञान से भेद होवे, ज्ञानी का है भेद करें ~सूरदास

[@777MANAV]

Shri Keshav anand prabhji toh ekdum scholar hai and kitne underrated hai kisiko genuine darshan sunna hi nahi hai

[@777MANAV]

@@-ev8lm mention the statement jo unhone bola and wrong tha

[@Soulll.215]

Asuro aur Tamsik logo ko samjh nahi ayega.

[@ashrutkumar4513]

V good Prabhu but how do you explain Chaitanya mahaprabhu correcting Madhwacharya and establishing achintya bhedabheda over madhwa’s dwaita

[@risabhbharadwaj8214]

In the Caitanya Caritamrta (Madhya 9.277) Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu addressed the acarya of the Tattvavadis thus - sabe, eka guna dekhi tomara sampradaye satya-vigraha kari’ isvare karaha niscaye "The only qualification that I see in your sampradaya is that you accept the form of the Lord as truth." It is not that Sri Caitanya rejected Madhva’s philosophy (2), rather, he rejected the erroneous, distorted dogma which had entered the sampradaya of Madhva-acarya at that time. (3) This is the reason why Mahaprabhu used the phrase ‘tomara sampradaya’ (your sampradaya) rather than ’our sampradaya’ - in order to establish that He did not subscribe to the philosophy that was being propounded in the name of Madhva. Later, in the 16th Century, these inconsistencies were corrected to some extent by the great reformer Sri Vadiraja Tirtha. (4) The major principle established by Sri Madhva-acarya was that the Lord and His creation are real and that the jiva is eternally subservient to Isvara - the nine prameyas enhance these points. In this way the gaudiyas strictly follow in the footsteps of Madhva-acarya. Hare Kṛṣṇa!

[@beingthespiritsoul]

All the nine tenets of Sripad Madhvacharya are strictly followed by the Gaudya Vaishnavas. Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu didn’t rejected Madhvacharya philosophy, that’s fake propaganda spread by the Mayavadis to defend themselves from horror of Raurava. Rather Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu addressed the deviated Tattvavadis when he said "tomara sampardaya". Sri Vadiraja Tirtha later corrected the deviated Tattvavadis. This is the history. In the words of Sripada Baladeva Vishyabhusan, who wrote the legendary Govinda Bhasya in just 7 days, shattering the hearts of the Krishna Aparadhis, Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu didn’t changed Madhvacharya philosophy rather contributed to it, the prema tattva. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@MaskSanatani]

Bhai us ahvaan ne Instagram per bohot bura bura bola hai iskon ke bare me😢

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. Dandwat Pranam. To say anything is an easy task. Why don't he answer my videos ? Why he only upload those videos where some devotees are not able to answer his questions ? When he gets trashed, he simply doesn't answer videos which implies he is ignorant and only walks with cameras to upload videos when it suits his agenda.... If he is man enough, he should answer my videos.... Just passing allegations and finding faults is easy but if a sound reply is given then he should accept that he is following a guru drohi sampradaya which abuses Lord Narayana and Lord Vyasdeva. You can comment or put my videos links in Instagram comment sections or in status if needed and ask him to face that devotee who can kick his arse anytime. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@ckm-d8z]

माना उन्होंने तुम लोगों को बुरा बोला लेकिन तुम लोग जो शिव भक्तों का श्रद्धा समाप्त कर दे रहे हो ये बोलके की शिव भगवान नहीं है उसका क्या ?

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Kaun si sachaai dikhayi hai Bhai ? Apni sachaii dekhi hai Ahvaan - Call of Adharma ne ? Guru Drohi sampradaya me aate hue bhi usse koi sharam nahi hai ki answer de video ka.... Khali fokat ka aroop lagana aata hai usse. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@chantdanceadvance4700]

​@@ckm-d8z इस्कॉन किसी शिव भक्त की श्रद्धा को ठेस नही पहुंचाता। यह आपकी गलत धारणा है । वास्तव में भगवान शिव की कृपा से ही कोई विष्णु भक्ति के मार्ग में अग्रसर होता है ।

[@ab_edits508]

​@@chantdanceadvance4700 agar isckon shiv bhakt ko thes nhi pahunchata toh srila Prabhupad ne kyun apne commentary mein shivji aur brahma ji ko follow karne wale ko pakhand bataya hai? Aur unhe kisne adhikar diya bhagvad gita jaisi brahmavidya jaise books ke translation change karne ke liye?

[@vijaylakshmimani9470]

Increaseingly idiotic talk, unfit to be vedanty

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Who is unfit Vednati ? Sripad Adi Shankaracharya?

[@anandsharmavasisht3205]

ISKCON books are misinterpreted. They do not follow the primary vedic and purana philosophy. They accept medival interpretations as their base. To defend the obscure philosophy, they attack other philosophies to self claim authenticity. Crap.. Only thing that is correct is Krishna is the supreme Lord. Stop calling others as wrong. If you disagree I can give you 100 examples from your books.

[@VivekKumar-zb2sx]

Shankracharya ne galat nahi kiya tum SCKCON walon ne galat translation kiya hai bhagvad geeta ka , to apne aap ko thik karo.

[@beingthespiritsoul]

Hare Krishna. Fallacy of Sri Adi Shankaracharya has been shown in the video. Instead of acknowledging that, don't behave like child barking that Iskcon is wrong. Hare Krishna 🚩

[@ayushmanmishra1749]

Prabhu ji nigrahacharaya ke upar bhi video bnaiye plz