Advances in PFAS Destructive Technologies

  Рет қаралды 639

SERDP and ESTCP

SERDP and ESTCP

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 1
@mrbbizzle
@mrbbizzle 6 ай бұрын
At 19:16, A plot is shown with BN degrading PFOA with time under 254 nm illumination. Just before this, it was stated that BN has a band gap of 6 eV. 254 nm is only ~4.9 eV which wouldn't be enough to do the photocatalysis. I was curious if the light source used was measured to ensure it can excite the band gap of the BN or if the observed reactions are actually from defect sites on the BN. Is there any theoretical precedence for these potential defects? If the latter is true, does that change your approach for degrading PFAS? Perhaps more focus understanding the true underlying mechanism might be more fruitful. Thanks for the nice talk!
Novel Technologies for Ex Situ and In Situ PFAS Treatment
1:22:52
SERDP and ESTCP
Рет қаралды 243
Advances in Sustainable Energetics
1:19:30
SERDP and ESTCP
Рет қаралды 182
Мен атып көрмегенмін ! | Qalam | 5 серия
25:41
My scorpion was taken away from me 😢
00:55
TyphoonFast 5
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН
Developing PFAS-Free Firefighting Foams
1:20:51
SERDP and ESTCP
Рет қаралды 187
Improving Measurement Accuracy for PFAS Passive Samplers
1:26:43
SERDP and ESTCP
Рет қаралды 191
Understanding PFAS Toxicity in AFFF-Impacted Marine Environments
1:25:58
Tools and Sensors for Characterizing PFAS Source Zones
1:22:41
SERDP and ESTCP
Рет қаралды 215
Chenab Bridge | How a Modern Engineering Marvel was Built?
12:23
Sabin Civil Engineering
Рет қаралды 2,2 М.
How to Build Effective AI Agents (without the hype)
24:27
Dave Ebbelaar
Рет қаралды 100 М.
Distinguished Lecture Series in Energy: Dr. David Allen
42:30
Texas A&M Energy Institute
Рет қаралды 88