Excellent, summary Simon! I'm looking forward to LakeFlow. 😀
@omgitsbenhayes5 ай бұрын
Nice recap of the key announcements! ABAC demo was 🎉
@rommelbojorgee.89025 ай бұрын
Nice summary, thanks Simon
@drummerboi4eva5 ай бұрын
Amazing Simon, thanks for this update
@kaurivneet14 ай бұрын
Was eagerly waiting for your video Simon! I think if Lakeflow turns out to be as good as another replication tool that would be the biggest disruptor to how we currently do lakehouse. Data acquisition has always been the sore point in the data platform. Other one as you mentioned, tag based access control is something I have been waiting for almost 2 years!
@mkrichey15 ай бұрын
I think most of those changes are going to have a big effect on the way we manage data. Databricks are setup to be the single tool right up to the point you visualize the end result. Wonder how MS feel about the fact they might end up serving instances of the very platform that makes fabric a bit redundant :P especially if the pricing is clear and competitive :)
@MichaelEwins19674 ай бұрын
I agree that the Tabular acquisition will lead to improved interoparability for Delta Lake & Iceberg users. For me this signals more the trend of reducing data movement and ETL so that people can use data where it is. And all access control is managed by Unity Catalog.
@danhorus5 ай бұрын
And I'm here still waiting for that for_each task xD
@AdvancingAnalytics5 ай бұрын
It's on the roadmap, it was on one of the keynote slides and everything! 😅
@alexischicoine20725 ай бұрын
lake flow seems great if you can source control and deploy it. Hopefully it’s also somewhat testable.
@alexischicoine20725 ай бұрын
I liked your point about Serverless and what we do. Hopefully by the time the transition is done I’ll have retired into leadership 😂
@ErikParmann5 ай бұрын
What do you know about the realtime mode? Do you think it's just a rename of the experimental spark continuous mode?
@AdvancingAnalytics5 ай бұрын
I need to dig into what's been announced publicly so I don't break NDAs - but I can say that what I've seen has come a fair way from the old continuous mode, it's more than just the spark engine change behind what's driving the performance increase.
@alexischicoine20725 ай бұрын
Hoping we get branches in delta for write audit publish as that’s a pretty useful feature in Iceberg.
@Mim_BI5 ай бұрын
come on, not a single word about duckdb, it was everywhere on the keynote :)
@AdvancingAnalytics5 ай бұрын
Haha, it's true - there was the segment from Hannes himself. But the update is largely that DuckDB can now natively read Delta right, nothing I saw is directly Databricks functionality? That said, I'm waaaay overdue a separate video spinning up duckdb on a single node and showing how fast it is!
@norbertczulewicz16955 ай бұрын
Currently only SQL Warehouse can be serverless which supports SQL only. Does it mean that Python is not recommended in the new projects?
@AdvancingAnalytics5 ай бұрын
That's what the announcements were all about - they're rolling out Serverless for Workflows/Notebooks which means full serverless python support. Python is thoroughly recommended for any engineering/automation workloads (with embedded SQL for transformations as necessary)
@norbertczulewicz16955 ай бұрын
@@AdvancingAnalytics The biggest problem is the price. Serverless option is the most expensive workload in Databricks. For many companies it can be a blocker especially when chipper option exist. I've heard about situation where companies ask developers not to use SQL serverless warehouse because of that
@ErikParmann5 ай бұрын
@@AdvancingAnalytics Hopefully this means serverless supported in more regions!
@gags2209885 ай бұрын
Isn't Genie just hitting the openAI endpoint?
@AdvancingAnalytics5 ай бұрын
Nope - the original Databricks Assistant was using OpenAI, this new iteration is a flavour of DBRX, with the context of your own data (unity catalog, recent activity/queries etc etc). Should have far, far more context than just hitting an open endpoint.
@TomPerry835 ай бұрын
I agree with the points about serverless making things easier and doing it better than a person would do. However, I would still want to know what it is doing, so I could replicate elsewhere (self hosted, other future vendor, etc). Otherwise this is another type of vendor lock Ie, if I'm too reliant on the platform optimising stuff for me, then I'm effectively locked in.