Aer Carry-On Small Review (2 Weeks of Use)

[@sgrant9814]

Suggestion when evaluating carry on luggage: Provide external dimensions (including wheels) , capacity in liters, and empty weight of bag. All three major considerations when using carry ons internationally as usually 21" is max height and usa/canada/mexico allowances of 22" inches are jot accepted as carryon. As well, when evaluating backpacks/personal item bags, most international and budget airlines have a max height limit of 16-17" and so a 45-50 ltr back pack is not an allowable personal bag

[@ejf071189]

While they don't mention that in the video, it is available on the review page linked from the description in the "Technical Details" section for pretty much all packhacker reviews FYI

[@sgrant9814]

@@ejf071189 it should be verbalized as part of the review

[@NomadByNecessity]

​@@ejf071189... pls just mention it already. KZbin is not a "sturdy material".

[@RealMuperSan]

I’m going with one of the Travel Pro line. Cheaper and years of real user testing.

[@Komplexitet]

Why are all these bags so heavy? Mine is

[@jimbergmann8633]

I’m stuck on Briggs and Riley. Best warranty in industry. Baseline collection, timeless quality.

[@sgrant9814]

Agreed but they do not have a international carry on size on their website

[@jimbergmann8633]

@@sgrant9814 Incorrect. “Enjoy practical luxury anywhere in the world with our Baseline 21” Global Carry-On.” Briggs and Riley website. $699.

[@healinginfluence]

Excellent review. Thank you.

[@PackHacker2]

Thanks for watching! 😃

[@BY-ib9ew]

It would be better if the compression panel was on the FLAT side and not the side with the handle protrusions

[@makotokino4533]

Looks cute and sleek but I still go smaller just for comfort and maneuver around

[@naniLULW]

when will you review the osprey nebula 32l thanks

[@Rosa52]

I'm so annoyed with companies releasing weirdly large carry ons, this "small" version is barely within common dimensions and entirely too large for airlines with ""small" carry on requirements. They claim the small fits in all major airlines but I can think of two MAJOR airlines off the top of my head that demand a depth of less than 9 inches. If you're buying a new bag anyway, why take the chance if the goal is carry on? Annoying enough it turns me away from the brand as a whole.

[@HH-ur5gd]

Which major airlines?

[@mumenrider677]

If an airline has carry on requirements that are smaller than that, you’re better off bringing something that’s not rolling luggage as your carry-on…

[@Rosa52]

​@@mumenrider677it's not about that, it's about the claim it fits all major airlines. Some people can't carry backpacks

[@Rosa52]

​@@HH-ur5gdair china, asiana

[@tylerkrasavage5656]

Those might be the written requirements, but I bet you this would still fit in their bag sizers. And you'd have no issues

[@devindoherty184]

tattoos 🤙

[@LetsGo_Brandon]

tattoos on women are trash 😂

[@Khalmoon]

Aye!!!!