Aeronautica Vs PTFS, Who wins?

In today's video, I'll take a look at a few different aspects of #aeronautica and compare them to #ptfs and see who wins in the set about comparisons!
Please keep in mind that these are all my opinion and both games appeal to two different demographics of people, If you dislike my opinion please be civil about it in the comments section.
#roblox #roaviation #roaviationreviews #comparison #pilottrainingflightsimulator #Aeronauticaroblox
Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Drop them below!

[@Aeronauticable]

Adding this a few days later because I’ve seen a lot of the same stuff: 1 - Yes, My channel is primarily focused on Aeronautica, but I have shown this video to multiple people outside of the RoAv community and they’ve all agreed that Aeronautica is better than PTFS. 2 - No, I am not saying PTFS is trash, I am saying Aeronautica is just better. 3 - Yes, I have been made aware that the 767 model in PTFS is older, but at the same time, as an outsider how am I supposed to know this? Yes, I probably could have compared something like the F-16s, but PTFS’ F-16 is paid access, and I’m not gonna pay to for something I’m never gonna use. 4 - While Aeronautica lacks flaps and gear tilt, it’s makes up for that in both flight physics and model quality. Again, *I am not saying PTFS is bad, I am just saying Aeronautica is better. Plus this is my opinion. if you don’t like it, cope.*

[@theopenkingdom]

cope cope cope

[@MatchingUser]

@@theopenkingdomhow is any of that cope you goober? He’s just trying to stop repeat comments Sounds like you’re just the coping one here.

[@theopenkingdom]

@@MatchingUser shut you don't know that meme?

[@AviationHour1]

Do you know that if you put square windows on airliners, they might crack and EXPLODE. It has happened before.

[@theopenkingdom]

Yes.@@AviationHour1

[@grantgraves6844]

one thing that is good about aeronautica is that you can fly at 32 thousand feet for 20-30 minutes or an hour and the devs put so much work into the scenery

[@Aeronauticable]

Yup

[@martyb866]

​@@Aeronauticablebut there is no gear tilt but ptfs has gear tilt

[@iambread345]

​@@martyb866oh stfu ur just jeoulus that ptfs uses a model buildings instead of making one

[@AstroYT69]

It doesn't rlly matter since players mostly won't even know it even tilts

[@EndIessProductions]

@@AstroYT69avgeeks would

[@blanquistao1423]

I think the only bad points of aeronáutica are not having flaps, spoilers, reversers and so important, they dont have tilted landing gears.

[@Aeronauticable]

All are good eye candy, but really aren’t too big of a deal.

[@ciusszzz-music2203]

Press Z for Reverses Press X or Y for Flaps or Spoilers Press N, M, O for Miscs

[@boeingenjoyer763]

@@ciusszzz-music2203aero don’t have flaps

[@ciusszzz-music2203]

@@boeingenjoyer763 cap. it have. but for some plane. I have ever use one. B-29 or What i forgot it have flap but no animation and no spoiler

[@boeingenjoyer763]

@@ciusszzz-music2203 yes, SOME planes but not all planes

[@insects-xj4si]

The only problem i had in aeronautica is the planes drifting when taxiing

[@Morganou2019]

thats not an aeronautica only problem, happens across all roblox games due to floating point error. The map is too small on PTFS for you to see that butr if it was bigger the same thing would happen

[@MistaImpala]

The farther you get from a spawn point, the more laggier and unstable movement is when on the ground. Its simple and expected by a lot of people

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

@@Morganou2019 yeah its an issue with driving games that have super massive maps

[@Maltese_Snail_Dude]

relatable

[@5JLazerManYT]

who wins? 1. aeronautica 2. aeronautica 3. my favorite one, aeronautica

[@itsjosh3009]

👍

[@forty94u]

Results defeated ptfs Unstoppable aeronautica

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

W

[@the-je6zn]

in your opinion i guess

[@es14689]

👎

[@orangetimeexpress1221]

Yet Aeronautica has 150 - 300 players on simultaneously on average, while PTFS can sometimes reach 8k. Are people just so unaware or do they not like the grind?

[@Aeronauticable]

most likely a mix of both

[@mapper7310]

Both, but also PTFS appeals to a much younger playerbase than Aeronautica. Obviously with that said there are way more kids/teens on Roblox than teens/young adults

[@masonsmainlineroblox]

@@mapper7310 im a kid and i still love aeronautica, ptfs did get me into ro-aviation but aeronautica is my go-to now

[@ilikecrawfish21]

aeronautica needs mobile support, because of kids

[@Morganou2019]

@@ilikecrawfish21 mobile support already exists, but the game is not made for it. Most mobile devices will crash at big airports, and there is no way to avoid that without removing most details off the map.

[@boeingenjoyer763]

Ptfs is more of a arcade and roleplay game, aero is more of a actual flight sim.

[@IamnotShawn777]

Well, imagine those people trying to act as such a "realistic atc conversation" in such an unrealistic game

[@boeingenjoyer763]

@@IamnotShawn777 it’s funny to watch people have a arc convo in that game

[@Spy_Agent5]

I would also like to add that Aeronautica has much more and better sounds than PTFS. PTFS only has GPWS and Engine sounds while Aeronautica has Airport, Nature, Waves, and Wind sounds. Adding on to the already long list of differences of quality between PTFS and Aeronautica

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

hi spy @Spy_Agent5

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

and yes I agree

[@benjohn6197]

Now it has engine and GPWS sounds too

[@Nicalobocinator]

And bird sounds lol

[@kornibel9565]

in the physics you failed to mention that aeronautica has overspeed mechanism were you engins will explode and that their is a crash animation, if you hit the ground at the right speed, you can also do sully like water landing and they are somewhat realistic. but great video as allways, aeronautica is defenetly better for me.

[@Aeronauticable]

Yes, that only makes Aeronautica an even better option

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

ikr@@Aeronauticable

[@aerodynamical]

Though I believe that Aeronautica really is a much more superior ro-aviation game, I must thank PTFS for introducing me to ro-aviation, and other games such as Neo Warfare X, which led me to Aeronautica. That being said, Aeronautica absolutely dunks on PTFS in most ways.

[@nutaplexus]

PTFS was also one of the first RoAviation games I played, as well as Dynamic Flight Simulator and Scallbob22's Flight Simulator (SFS). They're quite old now, and it really shows when you compare them to modern flight simulators like Project Flight and, of course, Aeronautica, which is by far the best.

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

it dunks on PTFS in EVERYTHING

[@jupiter776]

​@@nutaplexusOne of the first RoAviation games I also played is PTFS as well. That's how I got in to RoAviation.

[@ny_lium]

aeronautica is simply a superior flight simulator

[@Aeronauticable]

I would agree, although both games are good for their respective communites.

[@IL-96_Enjoyer]

Not really a flight sim more of a tycoon-ish ro aviation game

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

I've seen alot of toxicity in PTFS in the last year when I have played it@@Aeronauticable

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

stop the cap@@IL-96_Enjoyer

[@IL-96_Enjoyer]

@@aaronkiefer-he1jl Gurl I'm a expert in aeronautica it is a tycoon based game

[@cerealeggvr6942]

Usually with the doors in aeronautica you have to start the engine and then it will go smoothly

[@Cconcorde]

one cool feature ptfs has that aero doesn't have is landing gear tilt. when landing if I want to *butter*, its kinda hard to tell if I buttered or not. I get that there are over 250 planes but like the 767s (With advanced engine swapping and stuff) , they can add a cool feature to newer planes or something.

[@Morganou2019]

they are already remodeling and adding advanced liveries to new aircraft, advanced customization, some even get flaps like the new B-52H remodel coming out soon. Adding gear tiliting would take a lot of time to animate for a change that doesnt really affect gameplay much

[@Aeronauticable]

Gear tilt would be nice eye candy, but the payoff isn’t worth the effort.

[@alexdunlop9601]

​@@AeronauticableI get that, but part of me reckons it'll happen eventually, I remember before aeronautica got advanced liveries the Devs said they were never going to add them but look where we are now.

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

yeah I agree with the content creator@@Aeronauticable

[@IamnotShawn777]

WHO TH cares about gear tilt on a high quality plane exterior in aeronautica, unlike PTFS, just look at the 777 and the 767, miserable

[@kittycorn1068]

Aeronautica is maybe better, but PTFS stays for me the iconic Roblox flight simulator. I don’t really like realistic Roblox flight simulators. If I want realistic then I just play MFS2020

[@Morganou2019]

aeronautica isnt that realistic. there are literally flying cow cubes and tanks, you can do barrel rolls with any plane, etc. also compared to MFS and PTFS aeronautica has a progression system

[@Aeronauticable]

Fair enough

[@teresasoutovazquez3018]

I play msfs too

[@stoowarbisgoodmonster]

@@Morganou2019 Cow cubes are JOKE PLANES. The Antonov A-40 Was real. You can also do Barrel rolls in PTFS If you can go in advanced mode. Cope

[@IamnotShawn777]

If you don't like realistic flight simulation, then just don't call it as a "simulator", go play some shitty physics games

[@matthiaslellis3893]

aeronautica is underrated, its a very good game

[@Digitness]

I believe that Areonautica takes the top spot because of its huge variety of planes and customisation and lack of p2w, however in PTFS you can get out of the plane and do ground crew and stuff. PTFS is better in that aspect, but the plane physics are garbage.

[@ainsleyfrastructurekpopmashups]

In PTFS, there is a lot of gamepasses, I think the developers prioritize profitability, while in Aeronautica, it prioritizes accessibility, so Aeronautica is like an open-source ROBLOX experience.

[@aaronkiefer-he1jl]

yeah

[@NonWorkingBulb]

You can do ground crew stuff with the aeronautican

[@United_kingdom806]

Thanks for information

[@KacperNerf_Aviation12]

i completely agree. i used to play ptfs everyday but when i found aeronautica i basically forgot about it.

[@patchythecable]

Honestly, I think it's a bit unfair comparing the two because they both are a very different style of game developed in very different manners. However, I think you made a very nice video and I agree with what you've said.

[@masonsmainlineroblox]

the are not a different style..

[@Aeronauticable]

Fair enough!

[@deltaguy295]

@@masonsmainlineroblox PTFS: Arcade like and blocky, has an semi realistic and unrealistic approach. No crash physics Aeronautica: More realistic approach and has crash physics (like overspeed for example,) less blocky you: *_i see no difference here_*

[@masonsmainlineroblox]

@@deltaguy295 they are both plane style ganes

[@deltaguy295]

@@masonsmainlineroblox both plane simulation games with different styles

[@sylentnoise932]

Aeronautica: Better gameplay loop and has actual progression Better airport diversity Better vehicle diversity Better map More things to do in game PTFS: Better taxiing system (I cry) Better particles (landing gear touchdown smoke, wingtip vapor trails) Cockpits. Cabin seats. Personally I prefer Aeronautica, but it would be insane if PTFS' pros were adopted into Aeronautica. There would be no stopping aero from being the #1 roaviation game.

[@ainsleyfrastructurekpopmashups]

Aeronautica: The map is expanding every update, PTFS: its map are stagnant. I think in the next update, Aeronautica will expand with Singapore airport, also, Kyokkou can be expanded to include The Philippines, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Plus, its devs are also working on an exciting new continent, which is like a larger version of Norman Island, and it will include Dubai, too.

[@IamnotShawn777]

The cabin in PTFS just shit, when did the 737 turns into 4 seats in a row instead of 6????

[@sebastianasady4543]

I feel like your arguments are valid but you’re also being a little harsh on PTFS. PTFS is made by a smaller dev team who are simply trying to make a non-realistic arcade style simulator. Aeronáutica is a tycoon style game that’s more about the grind. Fun factor is huge in PTFS because you can fly with your friends and do whatever whereas in Aeronáutica it’s a lot different. Also each dev team uses different tools, different software, etc. I would play aeronáutica sólo just to fly, but if I want to play with people PTFS is the clear winner. I think a much more fair comparison would be two smaller games such as aeronáutica and something maybe like Flightline. PTFS’ community is much bigger and it’s more popular in due to the part that it’s older and much less grindy but something like flightline could turn out interesting!

[@Aeronauticable]

The point was to compare both games, Yes PTFS is older but that doesn’t justify a crappy model or 1/4 of the vehicles being paid access. Aeronautica is an economy game, not a tycoon.

[@sebastianasady4543]

@@Aeronauticable Yeah, that’s true, but like I said I feel like a more fair comparison would be with something like flightline. PTFS does not try to be realistic while Aeronáutica is fully centered around that. They both succeed in what they want to achieve, but for realism Aeronáutica takes the cake. I think an aeronáutica/flightline comparison could be pretty good since they’re both centered around realism

[@IamnotShawn777]

@@Aeronauticable man i totally agree, i fucking spent 1000 robux in PTFS, specially the usless ATC tower, and now I feel like I want to kill my self because of spending those robux

[@captainaaron9858]

The PTFS players will probably fume at this but who cares ? Atleast your giving honest opinion and showing the real potential of the game, Now keep up the good work 👍

[@plankton916]

I prefer ptfs but it's honestly personal opinion

[@Aeronauticable]

Appreciate it

[@APerson-fj6yx]

The only way I think ptfs is better is in physics, but just barely due to the tilted landing gear and flaps

[@Aeronauticable]

nah, tilted gear is the model more so anything, and that doesnt make up for the shitty flight physics

[@APerson-fj6yx]

@Aeronauticable you have a point there, you can do a 90 degree takeoff without A/B in a Cessna 172, yet somehow people still call it, “realistic”

[@user-tk6rj9bi4b]

@@Aeronauticable language kids are reading, keep things civil

[@jupiter776]

​@@user-tk6rj9bi4bno one gives a shit

[@IamnotShawn777]

PTFS physics are making newton angry

[@APerson-fj6yx]

Time to dunk on PTFS, I can’t believe I used to play this game. The models. Even the remodeled planes suck. I mean the fighters are decent but they are still blocky. Even the old Fokker 100 model looks better than most of the models in PTFS. Second of all, they privated their development game, for the reason, “muahahaha it’s a secret”. Does the secret take 4 months to develop? Speaking of updates, they are so inconsistent! Sometimes every month, and sometimes every year. Also the terrain. Like, the buildings are decent but they use too many decals and the islands are way too big for the little amount of airports they have. Like, have a big continent for overland long haul flights. And then the atc… due to this being a simple game, atc is full of 8 year olds who bought the gamepass going, “Hardjet 3844 cler fro takoff from runway” meanwhile they are in the middle of a flight. Then again that also does happen in aeronautica but it’s way more common in PTFS. Also for the amount of planes in the game, that many gamepass planes? You have a Walrus, SR-71, F-22, F-35, F-16, A380, and for the group vehicles, a Concorde (in my opinion very well modeled and animated) a P-38 (why group?) and a very badly modeled F-4. And like you said, physics go brrrr

[@Aeronauticable]

Yup. Couldn't agree more.

[@APerson-fj6yx]

@Aeronauticable I know this comparison is biased but I don’t care. I’m tired of seeing this game praised when it actually sucks

[@IamnotShawn777]

@@APerson-fj6yx Finally😭 some wise human has spoken the truth

[@Calxero]

POV: when you taxi in aeronautica: \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

[@LiamRoberts-Aeronautica]

Aeronautica wins, no more commenting needed

[@hist9022]

the things is, pts is like a 2 dev game

[@snowglobe2]

The knobs are long because PTFS is downscaled. They made the world itself half the size so that double the stuff could fit. For example if you go to the oil rig the trusses are oversized.

[@Aeronauticable]

Knob size isn’t affected by scaling, it’s affected by how big the devs made them lmao

[@BurgertonYT]

As a PTFS player. I would only play Aeronautica if the game didn't have fuel, grinding and repairing, as that stresses me out.

[@Aeronauticable]

If a plane can take the job it can do the flight..

[@Nicalobocinator]

Sorry to say but if those stress you out you will never become a pilot

[@BurgertonYT]

@@Nicalobocinator it's not really that, because i've already played games where you have to be careful with finances and stuff, but I really dislike having to worry about simething in the game, and risk running out of money

[@Nicalobocinator]

@@BurgertonYT you can get loans ingame so running out of money isnt really an issue, plus just ask people to give you money i once got 100k wp for literally nothing lol

[@BurgertonYT]

@@Nicalobocinator I guess. Also, I think you need bigger and faster airplanes to be able to cross the whole map.

[@itsjosh3009]

Try comparing Project Flight and Aeronautica next video

[@Aeronauticable]

maybe

[@itsjosh3009]

@@Aeronauticable 👌

[@GreatAukReacts]

@@Aeronauticable i bought it and the atc is also a gamepass. 60 robux gamepass for atc

[@blaisepascal3804]

i heartily agree

[@PhoenixmartinBMS]

Now, i feel like we can get a fair comparison Aeronautica vs neo warfare X

[@Aeronauticable]

This is a pretty fair comparison.

[@qataraviation747]

You forgot that PTFS doesn't need a lot of useless training to play.

[@Aeronauticable]

A lot is an overstatement.

[@IamnotShawn777]

and u forgot that PTFS has lot of low quality plane models and u forgot that PTFS's gamepasses has a total cost of 2955 robux

[@ItzMajorAviation]

I don’t think this is a fair comparison because ptfs is basically just a simple aviation game that is just for fun but aeronautics is a simulation

[@Aeronauticable]

Aeronautica is far from simulation. It's just that PTFS has awful physics.

[@eleanoralvarado5406]

BRO YOUR KZbin IS ON AERONAUTICA! Come on man!

[@Aeronauticable]

Yes, I primarily make Aeronautica content. But that doesn't forbid me from having my opinions on PTFS

[@FieldMarshal356]

now don't get me wrong, i really like aeronautica but there are some stuff in this video i disagree with, like how aeronautica wins the cockpit quality even though most of the planes don't have a cockpit and every plane in ptfs has adleast something to fill the interior, idk man i made a poll on my channel and an overwhelming amount of people voted for ptfs

[@Aeronauticable]

I wasn’t comparing cockpit numbers, I was comparing the QUALITY of the models.

[@AFG.1]

Though he forgot to take into notice that ptfs devs are way less and they use studio not blender.

[@tomata8417]

so?

[@Aeronauticable]

I don’t care what software they use, if the model is shit, the model is shit

[@IamnotShawn777]

@@Aeronauticable Exactly, if you guys are just taking pity on PTFS devs, just tell them to use the fucking blender

[@blockofcheese8015]

So I played aeronautica briefly(I'm a PTFS player) and I still think I like PTFS more. However, I will admit that Aero seems more thought out. My biggest conclusion, though, is that PTFS is a flying game while Aeronautica is a plane game. In PTFS, you have options to have unlimited fuel, no winds at all, and play it like an arcade game. You also have access to (almost) every plane as soon as you join, letting you have more ways to play immediately. meanwhile Aeronautica has progression when you buy planes, along with licenses for them. I dunno. Ptfs is just more casual and I like it that way.

[@Aeronauticable]

I can respect your points, as for me, PTFS just isn’t as good as Aeronautica, but in no way Is a bad game

[@MistaGSpecialEducation]

PTFS has superior physics IMO, but Aeronautica has the best grind and process, makes game more enjoyable. So I guess PTFS is like a game that is just flying and no grind.

[@Aeronauticable]

Dude what? Aeronautica’s physics are so much better. In PTFS you can climb at a 45 degree angle and GAIN airspeed. The only reason you like PTFS’s physics is because they are more forgiving.

[@GreatAukReacts]

@@Aeronauticable Yeah, only way you can gain speed while going that angle is afterburners (and i don't think ptfs even has afterburners)

[@IamnotShawn777]

@@Aeronauticable U CAN 90 DEGREES CLIMB A GOD DAMN B-29 I CRIED WHEN I SAW THAT

[@gabrielquinones3343]

Aeronatuica has a bigger map and you can travel far distances for much more cinematic views ptfs, map is short you can easily cross it in about a few minute in aeronatuica it takes hours to cross the whole map and fuel burns more

[@Aeronauticable]

Ok

[@Bife_11]

personally, I only find PTFS cool when there’s an ATC or playing with friends. Since the map is so small, I have almost nothing to do.

[@averageatwarthunder]

aeronautica is overall better but nothing can beat doing a butter landing in ptfs

[@Aeronauticable]

i gues

[@DelinquentRevenge]

imo buttering in project flight is better

[@IamnotShawn777]

so you are flexing you butter landings uder that kind oof ultra shit physics?

[@ducksractuallyepic]

barely any aeronautica planes even have cockpits, but all ptfs planes have cockpits

[@egeiscan5206]

bait, bait used to be believable

[@IamnotShawn777]

there are a lot of planes in aero that have cockpits now

[@nathandenials]

i used to play PTFS all the time because i though it was the superior simulator. then i discovered PF and Flightline and then aeronautica. i LOVE aeronautica because you don't have to use robux for anything, it's all grind! so you can't have that rich kid that'll flex there airplanes that they "grinded" hours for. and aeronautica having a trading system is amazing! the devs are coming up with even more content for the game and with the hundreds of aircraft's, i don't think anyone's gonna get bored of playing aero

[@randomer339]

YO THAT'S A GOOD POINT!

[@antlionworkerfan2007]

Although PTFS losses out on most things the ghost of Neo Warfare X still haunt me in aeronautica and dealing with randomly stopped aircraft when I don’t want to means a point to PTFS

[@Aeronauticable]

No tf it doesn’t lmao, that’s your Wi-Fi

[@antlionworkerfan2007]

@@Aeronauticable uh huh, sure, have you ever seen an aircraft launch in to the air at 100 knots while taxiing to a runway? no? well that’s not something you would see in ptfs either

[@alepander4698]

@@antlionworkerfan2007 are you talking about the aircraft being shown from different servers? thats normal silly billy

[@rileytat123]

PTFS has tilted gear, tire smoke, and not so bad landing physics (plane doesnt bounce around), but i do prefer aeronautica

[@davidosarus]

pov: this dude compared the only cockpit in aeronautica with of tons cockpits in PTFS

[@Aeronauticable]

You are right, PTFS has more cockpits, but most of them are hot garbage.

[@davidosarus]

ok ive returned. ptfs are remaking all cockpits for 3rd gen (as i call it) @@Aeronauticable

[@Generl1107]

This is a heavily unfair competition, and that is because the dev team of PTFS is 3 people maximum, they only have one builder which makes the aircraft and map all by himself. Not trying to rage, just proving a point.

[@Aeronauticable]

One person should be able to make a good quality model

[@Generl1107]

​@@Aeronauticable Yes, but Aeronautica has a much larger team, able to make more aircraft faster.

[@IamnotShawn777]

POV: when PTFS loses a fight oH mY gOd pTfS hAS oNLy 3 dEVs~~

[@Generl1107]

@@IamnotShawn777 what will be better?A game with 500 devs,or a game with 10 devs of the same skill

[@Pantheredit5]

Yall hear me out they dont play aeronautica cuz some ppl are lazy to do it cuz of the grinding but id say aeronautica solos.

[@magentilized]

Even though I think Aeronautica is better than PTFS, the PTFS community seems more active and friendlier than the Aero one.

[@Aeronauticable]

Depends on who you meet. If you come into Aeronautica begging for stuff, you wont get it.

[@MartinTheGhost]

There's some chill people in aero

[@captainaaron9858]

There are chill people in aero but it’s just that you don’t see them everyday

[@Barely_edit1n]

the only thing I dont like about aeronautica that you need to go on trainings and make money to buy planes

[@Aeronauticable]

That’s the entire point of the game lol

[@help5367]

first thing to keep in mind (specially for model detail): ptfs is full size, aeronautica has very small planes hence why you can run that many detailed models and that big of a map in a potato PC, also the physics in aeronautica are wack because of the small size of the planes, still loving aeronautico tho

[@Fish5216m]

That 767 looked nothing like the 737

[@qataraviation747]

Bro just chose all the weakness of PTFS and put it

[@Aeronauticable]

Weaknesses? Buddy I showed what PTFS actual is

[@RailfanVal]

1:55 Livery ID and Wing ID?

[@friedpotato184]

You forgot to talk about scenery, Ptfs is just basic stuff. Rarely gets new airports While aeronautica, Has alot of shit. You can do stuff from landing in the arctic, To the kai tak heart attack, And since there are so many, You dont really feel bored of them. Also the landing physics are- Not bad...

[@MenaceFromPa]

Bro made it sound like ptfs is Fly wings 2015 💀

[@Aeronauticable]

Cause PTFS is not as good as Aeronautica

[@IamnotShawn777]

It is, probably worse

[@WRLDAROUNDEN]

We need more points, so I'll continue your list and video with a comment: 1. Destruction: In ptfs the planes have no destruction, however only destruction is water. In aeronautica you can get killed by overspeed, ramming something and water too, however PTFS did the water destruction better. + 0.5 points for PTFS for water +1 Point to Aeronautica for destruction overall. (Now its 0.5 of PTFS vs 6 of Aeronautica) 2. Aeronautica has liveries which are custom made, you can even make your own, for what it receives 1 point, and PTFS has only owner-made ones. +1 point for aeronautica for customization and liveries. 3. RP availability. In PTFS you can do RP with interior and passengers, while in aeronautica you can only RP interceptions (better than in PTFS), and in aeronautica there are weapons, unlike PTFS. +1 point per each. (Now its 1.5 of PTFS vs 8 of aeronautica) 4. Availability. In Aeronautica there's a license system, grinding system and stuff, however in PTFS you can start with any plane and fly. In Aeronautica, you can be an ATC Dispatcher for free, however in PTFS its somewhere 100 robux'ish. In Aeronautica, the ATC is really well doing, and ATC experience there is better than in PTFS. Aeronautica +2 PTFS +1 (Now its 2.5 of PTFS vs 10 of aeronautica)

[@witherplayzzwitherfacts3936]

I moved from ptfs to Aero because aero has realistic cities , scenery, larger map etc.

[@Eye606]

U shall move to Project flight or Flightline i recommend trying them out

[@witherplayzzwitherfacts3936]

@@Eye606 Hopefully project flight once it becomes playable. Flightline doesn't have proper scenery.

[@Eye606]

Project flight is playable u shall try it@@witherplayzzwitherfacts3936

[@DelinquentRevenge]

​​@@witherplayzzwitherfacts3936 and alao flightline is a horrible game in general. the in-flight plane phsyics are an absoloute attrodity, i literally cant control the plsne every time i do a relatively mild turn the plane takes 3 sedonds to stabilise. also the autopilot is a convoluted mess, you need a map (that isnt in the game) with waypoints to set it up. i wouldnt reccomend this game on my worst enemy.

[@the-je6zn]

fun fact they are also remodeling some stuff i guess

[@Aeronauticable]

Sure, doesn't mean there aren't any mediocre models still in the game.

[@penguinboyplayz9692]

you deserve a mil subs

[@jupiter776]

I mean, PTFS is made by 2 developers and try to stay consistent with the game, not a PTFS defender. Aeronautica is still better but the amount of devs developing and trying to stay consistent is pretty impressive. I mean, the devs try hard to constantly update the game. Over all Aeronautica is better, but PTFS is still impressive for 2 developers (counting CoderQwerty, 3 developers. Opinon is respected though.

[@Aeronauticable]

fair enough of an argument

[@peterpacker1019]

Is anyone else gonna notice that his Yt channel name is Literally Aeronotica💀

[@Aeronauticable]

Just because i focus on Aeronautica doesn't mean I can't make content calling PTFS what it is - Trash

[@NavalAircraft]

@@Aeronauticable I just saw you saying in a comment that PTFS isn't trash but you're calling it trash??????

[@cccyanide3034]

Alternative title : aeronautica youtuber dunks on PTFS for 7 minutes. I don't even disagree, I really prefer Aero, but sometimes it just feels like you (more or less intentionally) omit details that go in favor of PTFS. Like for example, almost all aircraft in PTFS have full interiors/cockpits. While cockpits are more detailed in Aeronautica, only a few dozens out of the 400+ planes have them.

[@Aeronauticable]

While you are correct about the interiors, on PTFS aircraft, 90% of them are either extremely outdated, or straight up terrible. A bunch of seats in a row inside of a mesh isn't a cabin.

[@HLEB83K_RUS]

I would choose PTFS bc I’m on phone

[@AstroYT69]

I went from PTFS to aeronautica since PTFS doesn't have more and my fav planes and also many planes are for money and some are free. I was expecting like u farm and get money for planes than have to buy woth money and it free.

[@user-jx6bp4fm6d]

wait there are cockpits in aeronotica

[@shermanfox7338]

me personally, i would have given cockpits to PTFS as a lot more aircraft have cockpits compared to aero.

[@Aeronauticable]

I compared the quality, not the quantity.

[@IamnotShawn777]

My bro, Quality > numbers

[@Only-fn]

I like both flight sims the same there both good although ptfs could use some work

[@nathancrowe7523]

how do you access the cockpit in aeronautica?

[@Aeronauticable]

5

[@nathancrowe7523]

@@Aeronauticable ok thx!

[@yuenchyaoling8128]

Both games are equally good.(I'm saying this for the sake of not having a internet war over PTFS and Aeronautica.

[@volantee]

aeronautica is the game you go for a realistic experience, which you can have in ptfs, but it lacks the physics, details, and variety of airports/planes. ptfs is for users who just wanna fly, without worrying about realism

[@Aeronauticable]

Aeronautica is not a flight sim. It’s very unrealistic, it just has some better mechanics when it comes to flying when compared to PTFS

[@Plab1402]

Aeronautica is much better for one main (and personal reason), it's grind, sure "oooOooOoo grind boring Ptfs has planes that I can already use" but... think about it... it's much more rewarding when you EARN the plane (IE grind hours to get it) then just get it free, also a quarter of the planes in Ptfs are game passes, aeronautica is 100% free

[@stevennathanael4088]

Aeronoutica don't have tilted landing gears lol so 1 point for PTFS

[@Aeronauticable]

Gear tilt is nice, but gotta remember how much effort has to go into it.

[@FliDec]

@@Aeronauticable also the lags

[@matchaisacolor]

Play PTFS for more details. Play Aeronautica for big map, more planes, kinda like a simulator.

[@Aeronauticable]

Fair enough.

[@ainsleyfrastructurekpopmashups]

Play Aeronautica for ever-expanding map, because every year, an major update will occur, this is thanks to Aeronautica's team of over tens of developers.

[@matchaisacolor]

@@ainsleyfrastructurekpopmashups true

[@IamnotShawn777]

WTF????????? Aeronautica has more details did u even played it???????

[@jackomapping]

Don't get me wrong, I really like aeronautica, but.. PTFS is meant to be fun to play, aeronautica is leaning more to the realistic part, so I think this is not really fair considering you're just showing aeronautica's advantages.

[@Aeronauticable]

I’d say PTFS is more so trying to be on the side of realism. I can deal with mediocre models. What I really don’t like about PTFS is how the physics are terrible, and the map is tiny.

[@jackomapping]

@@Aeronauticable I agree with that.

[@user-vs9gl8oe6l]

ptfs is for fun and to just fly (even tought i would make at last the f-16 free) while aeronautica is for pros and real grinding

[@user-jx6bp4fm6d]

how do i do that

[@malaysiaballrr]

Don't hate me, but PTFS looks stuck in 2010. Can't handle my opinion? Cope.

[@LukianShevHahaYes]

More like in 2016-2018. Most of the plane models are straight out of 2019-2021. Fortunately, the devs are remodeling the planes and even some islands.

[@malaysiaballrr]

Yeah, at least the PTFS dev team are doing something, making the scenery less bleak and making the aircraft less outdated.

[@1981cenga]

3:30 ATC is paid bcs there will be so much trolles and it will just ruin the game.

[@Aeronauticable]

So then what do the people who aren't trolling do?

[@hengshengli527]

How to make an airplane cockpit

[@Aeronauticable]

idfk

[@mapper7310]

"The devs need to make money" Aero has like 10x the content and absolutely zero in game purchases. Its just greed

[@Aeronauticable]

I disagree, devs should be able to earn off of their work, but the penny pinching of PTFS is agitating

[@Morganou2019]

@@Aeronauticable they have donations and merch so quite a few people donate for a good game like aero, no need to put 20 gamepasses for nearly every aircraft/feature

[@Legoplanelover]

First of you should put cockpit and plane models in 1 section second of in ptfs they are gamepass planes but atleast people can use every free plane right when they join also 81 aircraft isnt a small amount

[@Aeronauticable]

First off, Nope. Cockpits and the exterior model are separate. and secondly, Sure you can use the free aircraft all at once, but my point was a quarter of the planes in the game are paid access and not unlockable at all. Plus, compared to the over 500 planes Aeronautica has at this point yeah... PTFS has a small number of aircraft. Especially as a F2P player.

[@Legoplanelover]

@@Aeronauticable you know ptfs is from 2010 and got a new version 2015 and ptfs has only like 3 devs

[@Aeronauticable]

PTFS has been continuously updated throughout its existence. All I am saying is that the average Aeronautica model is superior to the average PTFS model.

[@alepander4698]

@@Aeronauticable you were right when you said the community is going to get defensive when you pointed out the flaws for pilot training sim, for a fact it doesn't train you for any piloting.

[@IamnotShawn777]

@@Legoplanelover Every time when PTFS players loses a fight, they will say how less the devs are, how hard the modelings are blah blah, heard this millions times

[@antololo7910]

But how can you compare a sandbox with a grind game PTFS is a funny sandbox and aeronautica is for players that like to grind the money you shouldnt compare

[@justaguy3403]

But in that grind game all the content that is available for public is free and you won't need to spend a penny for a380, an225 and others

[@antololo7910]

if you dont need it dont pay for it easy and here in that grind game you dont spend money you spend your precious time a lot and in the ptfs u just hop and dont lie to me you wont be using a380 or an-225 alot and theres only one paid airliner i guess the only gamepass that you should buy is learjet bc its so good seats and paid=more quality so yk it kinda sucks that many military planes are paid but you know life is life if you really like to enjoy the game without needing to constant refuel and making stops PTFS is for you but if u want to waste the 10hrs to get the an225 you can no problem at all @@justaguy3403

[@Aeronauticable]

One requires money to gain access to everything, the other requires time.

[@iamshanvik]

PTFS is a role play game

[@RobloxianPilot457]

But, you have to keep in mind that PTFS is for the average user, while Aeronautica is for av-geeks and aviation enthusiasts.

[@Aeronauticable]

I would disagree, actually. While PTFS can be easily learned by the average user, Aeronautica is also very easy to learn. Quite frankly I think the only reason Aeronautica is not as popular is because it isnt as advertised.

[@Morganou2019]

@@Aeronauticable aeronautica actually has a few ads, just isnt as popular as a lot more youtubers do videos on PTFS, and a lot of younger people play it due to easy physics and no grind etc

[@martinxxcz2919]

@@Aeronauticable I think the main reason why aeronautica is less popular is the progression system, some people dont want to spend 839282 flying in ultralight to get cessna. I honestly like the progression system, but I understand people who despise it.

[@RobloxianPilot457]

@@Aeronauticable But the average Roblox user only spends like 30 minutes to 1 hour on Roblox. If I were them, I wouldn't spend the time in between supper and homework just to take a 20 minute flight and then do it again and again.

[@RobloxianPilot457]

@@Aeronauticable And their is the fact that only two people are currently working on the game, So the models might not be that realistic.

[@DouglasDc10american]

Bro I'm a fan of aeronaftika but ptfs although ptfs has a wheel at the landing Even though the wheels bend when they hit the ground

[@MeDoge351]

How bout Project flight 😎😎😎😎

[@Aeronauticable]

Maybe

[@Mateo-ve1od]

I think the only problem with Aeronautica is the grinding. There's sometimds you can't just spend 4 hours or more to afford a good plane plus the licenses. In PTFS you play more casual and there are specialized RP servers Another important thing is that in PTFS there's only one airplane modeler while in Aeronautica they're more and updates i dont think they're weekly like ptfs. But i think Aeronautica is a good game, just isn't to funny to spend 5 hours grinding

[@IamnotShawn777]

If you just hate grinding, just go and sue War Thunder

[@teimo642]

I agree aeronautica is much more better no doubt, but i think you had some bias for aeronautica for example: -yes aeronauta's cockpits are better but you forgot to mention that a few aircraft has cockpits. -the biggest flaw of the physics in aeronautica is that the taxiing is quite buggy for quite a lot aircraft PTFS dont have this.

[@Aeronauticable]

Again, I referred to the QUALITY of the cockpits, not the quantity. As for physics, that’s sometimes roblox goofing up, and not the airport models

[@gabrielquinones3343]

In ptfs the fuel burns slower the aircraft go at ridiculously speeds and can fly in ridiculous ways like vertical in a 747 or crash without dying aeronatuica is way more realistic as you fly vertical your plane stalls and if you crash you explode and a fire starts your plane can have failures

[@Aeronauticable]

Ok

[@user-mk4kw3zl6j]

Regardless of whether Aeronica is better than PTFS, Aeronautica is underrated and PTFS is overrated. I think PTFS's simplicity is not enough reason for PTFS have that many players. (Yes, im Aero player, but I play PTFS too cuz PTFS make less headaches.)

[@CR7guy5268]

Me personally I just prefer ptfs

[@eleanoralvarado5406]

PTFS is for those who want a simple, fun, flight simulator. Aeronautica is for those who don’t have MSFS and want a sorta realistic flight sim.

[@Aeronauticable]

Aeronautica isn't very realistic either, it's arcadey as well with slightly better everything.

[@perklinn1712]

Now aeronautica vs Microsoft flight sim😅

[@Aeronauticable]

💀

[@theopenkingdom]

Core reason why Aeronautica is better than PTFS: the latter is made for money, while the former, for fun.

[@Aeronauticable]

yup

[@mishymish9577]

PTFS is fun you dont need to pay

[@Aeronauticable]

For the fun stuff you do

[@Plab1402]

Pay for what? 5 0 0 F R E E P L A N E S?

[@AmericanTrainFoamer]

IMO i like PTFS because you get all the planes for free.

[@Aeronauticable]

No you don’t. You literally have to pay Robux for a quarter of them.

[@AmericanTrainFoamer]

@@Aeronauticable ok maybe not all but im not trying to fight but IMO PTFS is better.

[@cvgspotting]

@@AmericanTrainFoamer Your very wrong, All the planes in aero are free. i would rather grind than waste money on a shit game

[@AmericanTrainFoamer]

@@cvgspotting 1. ur late 2. maybe i had the wrong version. 3. whatever

[@Dhar_Mann69]

@@AmericanTrainFoamer4: ur a dummy

[@blamogaming123]

feels like this is propaganda

[@Aeronauticable]

nah, ptfs just isnt as good as aeronautica

[@Real_mizzancdt]

At least we the most popular avaition game in roblox

[@Aeronauticable]

Popular doesn’t mean the best

[@GreatAukReacts]

popular doesn't mean good. also, aviation*