UNSW - Aerospace Structures - Thin walled Beams (Bending)

[@teddymatthew600]

Thank you for the lectures! Is there a link to the rest of the video about the thin wall approximation in bending? Thanks!

[@SAINIVEDH]

where can i find the remaining lecture?

[@furkansaglam7381]

Omg! The most important part is missing 😢(thin wall approximation). Where we can find that ?

[@tashfeenuk]

I really like the lectures, is it possible anyone can number them on where to start and how to proceed?

[@zarakhaliq6163]

These videos are great! THANK YOU

[@mohamedezzat5767]

Thank you :) .. It's really helpful but where is the rest of the Chapter if you please there is another video I need its link

[@purichmunlow8605]

Which chapter is this lecture in the book (Aircraft structures for engineering students)?

[@joseangel5624]

Thank you, wonderful videos. It would be great to have one on damage tolerance of metallic structures.

[@btsismylifeuindianarmy4909]

It's really helpful. Thank you!!😇

[@JabirMvengara]

Do u thin that first shear force diagram for cantilever is right ??? Pls explain

[@AerospaceStructures]

Are you talking about the SF diagram at around 8:00? This is correct if the wing had a point load (i.e. engine) right out at the wing tip.

[@abheendrabandary5940]

sir regarding the SFD it 8.05 i think it is the opposite to that you have drawn like if it is flipped (correct me if am wrong)

[@AerospaceStructures]

You are probably right. I have to admit that I'm generally not careful with sign convention for these examples. In the end, the "sign" of a shear force doesn't matter too much unless we are doing superposition. The one I should be more careful about is bending moment as this one can completely change the stresses in the calculation.

[@mohiuddinsazzadmohiuddinsa1111]

is there any lecture on torsion?

[@AerospaceStructures]

Torsion is covered is this one: kzbin.info/www/bejne/m4nHiKZtrbWAarM

[@xuanmingzhou4325]

from Nottingham university

[@danieljones6862]

Can we get the 2400 video's? haha

[@invisibleman2059]

Is there a part about "Warping"? I want to know, about exercise 10.18 of Megson 4th-Edition, why "Pr" about point 2 is 50! For 1 is ok, s=50 and pr=25.. If i'm considering the external point; the same reasoning for 3 s=38 and pr=75. But if i do the same procedure for 2, i don't undestand why pr is 50 and not 75; s=50, is ok!