Hollywood is so over: The INSANE progress of AI videos

AI video generation reaches new limits.
#runwaygen3 #aivideo #ainews #ai #agi #singularity
Thanks to our sponsor Video to Blog. Convert KZbin videos into high-quality, SEO-optimized blog articles in seconds
www.videotoblo...
Newsletter: aisearch.subst...
Find AI tools & jobs: ai-search.io/
Support: ko-fi.com/aise...
Here's my equipment, in case you're wondering:
Dell Precision 5690 dell.to/4cAYjSZ
GPU: Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada nvda.ws/3zfqGqS
Mouse/Keyboard: ALOGIC Echelon bit.ly/alogic-...
Mic: Shure SM7B amzn.to/3DErjt1
Audio interface: Scarlett Solo amzn.to/3qELMeu

[@theAIsearch]

Thanks to our sponsor Video to Blog. Convert KZbin videos into high-quality, SEO-optimized blog articles in seconds www.videotoblog.ai/?via=ref

[@whiteknight54455]

Number 2 is AI generated 0:28

[@ayylmao394]

You know dude, you can made your videos without insulting the hard work people put onto their craft, thinking they will be replaced by you writing a prompt, please dont do this in your videos is really offensive and indignant.

[@ayylmao394]

You really went on a tangent on the later part of the video that was really unnecessary, this is why people still hate ai bros.

[@AIChameleonMusic]

feel free to use anything from my account as an example bro im a sub.

[@mattheww797]

did the company that's charging for commercial use train it's AI on copyrighted material?

[@user-11Il10I1]

It's so funny that we benchmark AI's improvement via prompting Will Smith eating spaghetti 😂

[@josephastrahan6403]

It should be will smith slapping spaghetti instead ;)

[@krisstopher8259]

@@josephastrahan6403 or chris rock eating will smith, lol

[@DrayNoR1]

it's the 'hello world' of programming but to test the AI videos hahaha

[@josephastrahan6403]

@@krisstopher8259 haha yes :P

[@FolkerHQ]

Spaghetti eating Will Smith is for video generation what Lena was for image compression 🙂 (e.g. when JPEG algorithm was tested)

[@AsherKadmiel]

shows grandma with skin crawling around her face :is this real ?

[@_SKevo]

LoOkS pReTTy ReAL tO mE

[@andregramazio3781]

Yes it's real, grandma is very sick 😢

[@garystinten9339]

​@@andregramazio3781early stage cancer sick

[@astralyd]

I just assumed all shots were fake lol

[@Vasily_dont_be_silly]

@@astralyd Nah the shot of woman driving the car looks way too stable to be AI, also AI vids are too smooth and have 0 camera noise which is a giveaway

[@sonyphotoguy6601]

I have nearly 100% right. There are always small problems in the AI videos. For example does the hand in the mirror of the Piano sometimes reach out of the mirror. Faces often have glitches that don't feel right. Often reflections are to perfect, like in the spaceship. The only thing that really impressed me was the fireworks.

[@theAIsearch]

Thanks for sharing!

[@DG123z]

Just wait a year

[@Cznh]

​@@DG123z Just wait a few months

[@DG123z]

@@Cznh Facts 💯 I was just trying to be conservative

[@LeftBoot]

The worst it's gonna be. Only getting better 🤯

[@cashdoo]

15:17 military boy throwing up his middle finger 😂

[@darklightprojector2688]

"serious look ✌ to a happy look 🖕"

[@mercedesf1fan176]

It’s garbage idk why the hype

[@khankuet]

🤪

[@MrFreezeGames]

@@mercedesf1fan176 hype is because it went from the first thing to this in what, a year? how's it gonna look like in 5 years??? the progression curve is crazy

[@queenr8216]

I think ai is tryna send a message

[@plorks445]

Been in the CGI industry for over 20 years. Took many many years for CGI in movies to start looking really really good. Ai is doing it in an absolute fraction of the time. My industry has already been effected by it. Concept artists are one of the first to get hit. Employers will hire someone to do a few images then they will let that person go and run those images through Ai to get many more variations. I've worked at companies that specifically signed contracts saying they won't use Ai but they still did, mainly for internal concept art.

[@theAIsearch]

Thanks for sharing!

[@3dsmaxrocks699]

Same. Been using 3dsmax for over 22 years and to see this industry die off after all the 'millions' of hours of hard work I put in is depressing AF.

[@kedamono6282]

@@theAIsearch Impressive, even the channel owner is a bot.

[@AffectionateLocomotive]

💀

[@AffectionateLocomotive]

The good quality vfx and cgi is gonne be mortally wounded.

[@nkacey2000]

This is what happens when you tease something like Sora and forget we're in the middle of an "AI arms race"

[@unityman3133]

have to censor it so you cant have trump twerking!!

[@JC-ig4xy]

well said

[@aimusiczones]

Very true

[@IanHollis]

I don't think they forgot, personally. I think they did it to see what the competition would do, and move forward accordingly.

[@jibcot8541]

I think it was too expensive to generate and it was costing OpenAI $100's a minute. So they would have gone broke if they publicly released it.

[@artzoneproductions3474]

Most of the AI video generators are slow-mo, so the 2 minutes in reality is 1 minute if you speed it up to normal speed

[@CodexPermutatio]

Things are going so crazy... In the near future, most people will believe that nothing is real.

[@krisstopher8259]

early AI: no one thinks it's real. mid AI: most people think it's all real. late AI: no one thinks anything is real because AI is everywhere

[@capitanwinters4422]

😅xd, la gente aún sigue creyendo que Josh peck, murió y fue remplazado por un doble

[@astralyd]

What a great prospect, so you're all excited about it? what's wrong with people? sigh

[@revisit8480]

Looking forward to using AI, so it can tell you what is real?

[@nsuarez]

That is the whole point...

[@wellstat]

these AI still need training data and those data comes from humans. once the internet starts to be flooded by ai videos, they will essentially be feeding in their own data and scenes get stagnant pretty quickly

[@guimcast1]

I don't think it will be 100% but most of it for sure

[@yerpderp6800]

If there was no noise then yeah, it would get stale very quick. But there is noise and weight decay, meaning things can always change. This gives some robustness to the model. In due time I'm certain that KZbin or a similar video platform will start experimenting with AI models generating videos that are trained off of views, likes, and comments, aka others' attention. Training data will still very much be abundant even if the data is predominantly generated by AI.

[@kooostia16]

Ml can use synthetic data

[@iamalexwolf]

I think they will have AI detect software to avoid using those videos

[@revisit8480]

@@yerpderp6800 "Just add noise" -the lukewarm IQ I think you don't understand what OP said there. AI feeds off videos to learn from. If you don't have any videos, and it's all AI generated, and those AI generated images are set to a learnt thing, they will produce the same result over and over. Nothing will change or improve, because AI doesn't have imagination or the ability to "walk around and film a scene".

[@VoidiumTheEye]

As someone who studied AI for a long time, this quiz was too easy Don't look for what's real, look for what's fake Here's the basics of what was wrong with every AI video: 1 - Hair is too stiff, flow is unnatural 2 - People in the water merges then disappears 4 - Buildings floating in water 5 - See the "remains" of an explosion, except that explosion never happened 6 - Her left eye becomes almost entirely black 8 - The holes in the panel hanging on the left side completely disappear 11 - The phone screen doesn't entirely match what's happening 12 - She has a necklace but no chain around her neck 13 - The wave on the right dies out but then comes but twice the length 14 - Her face is generating as it zooms out 16 - Reflection of hand is emerging from the back panel, black keys disappear for no reason 17 - People sitting right behind other people on the right side, way too close Oh and also every AI video is around 240p for some reason

[@KostiKD]

As someone who never studied AI, I've got almost everything right. Interestingly, the woman in the field of sunflowers looked real to me, but I realised that these are SUN flowers not "looking" towards the sun

[@shadowwarriorgaming1465]

Bro give me your linkedin i need some guidance related ai/ml

[@klausr3581]

Give it a few more months. Resistance is futile.

[@April_blue_shep]

Even ai Will improve more and that will be any inconsistencies

[@Tiredgeek]

@@klausr3581 Nah, cope harder

[@otavioo.2623]

i don't think hollywood is over; hollywood as we know is over

[@guiltybastard7859]

Hollywood is rapidly changing, or at least certain parts of it are rapidly changing. Video creation apps will be a major help to film makers, especially the ones who cannot afford to pay millions for special FX.

[@dariustakeda1609]

It will give power in the hands of indie producers. Just imagine what kind of memes awaits for us!

[@paul1979uk2000]

We are not quite at that stage yet, but I can see over the next decade that many will be wondering, why watch Hollywood movies or tv shows when I or anyone else can create their own for free. Better yet, using an existing show like Star Trek TNG and having A.I. create new episodes by it's going through all the episodes and understanding the arc of the actors, story and theme of the show and then creates new episodes with new stories that fit the narrative of the show, the possibilities are endless. I know some will say, never going to happen, but if you looked at how much A.I. has developed in just 2 years, you can only imagine what it will be like over the next decade or few decades from now, and this could be very destructive to the creative industry, especially the ones that are not listening to fans as we see with Star Trek and how many are not happy with the current state of Star Trek, basically, we could get far more fan made shows on basically everything, that is a clear threat to the creative industry because of having so much cheap contents for viewers to use, it reduces the value of human made content a lot. With all this said, for much of what I said above to happen, it will have to be a locally run A.I. model as online models will be too restrictive in what you can and can't do, and what I said above with the Star Trek thing, it's highly unlikely that any online model will allow that, but locally run A.I. well the sky is the limit.

[@sinnwalker]

@@paul1979uk2000 lol "decade", more like 1 year to 2 before the end of all creative fields, as viable businesses anyway. The money will be in cloud, how much compute power you have and how much you can sell it for. I agree cloud services will be more restrictive, but the majority will go to the cloud, and i think because of that there will definitely be a competition for what company has the least restrictions.

[@cnrspiller3549]

Tv drama and cinema has about 2 years left. We are probably within 5 years of being able to say to our ai phone, "Make me an 87 minute long film about a group of cowboys stepping through a time portal into prehistoric times. Make it about their struggle to re-find the portal and survive the dinosaurs etc. Create it in realistic cinema quality with the dialogue in American English. Genre is action adventure." Instantly, you have a Hollywood quality film that only you will ever see. Ai has long promised a joblessness tsunami... who'd have thought it would start with Hollywood? Drivers next.

[@TrueHelpTV]

I remember when the Will Smith spaghetti video had people speechless The generational leaps have been wild Makes you wonder what they aren't showing us.

[@djslip_irie]

I hear ya re the if this is what’s public concern … I watched a modded flipper unlock 20 cars , change the wifi ssid , change tv channel, unlock hotel doors, clone a bank card with pin. In the hands of my 17 yr old nephew. What do “they” have .. if this is on Amazon.

[@Soundcheck-EDM]

who are "they"

[@LEYTHLEGACY]

​@@Soundcheck-EDMthe elites, basically people with billions of dollars mostly from generational wealth that i wouldn't say "control the world" but are on par with the government because they give the funding.

[@ConstantinPalagyi]

tf you mean "they" are you some kind of concspiracy theorist?

[@mikehawk6175]

@@djslip_irieimpossible 😳

[@pay_it_forward_franklin4469]

based-on this; when Morpheus ask Neo "what is real?" has aged flawlessly, and is up Googleplex‼️🥶

[@revisit8480]

The tower of Babel aged like fine wine too.

[@pay_it_forward_franklin4469]

@@revisit8480 #peace I mean...; what we do know now is that "all exist" at the same time #specialrelativity101

[@liamlogan9930]

"Unrealistic" AI video of Will Smith eating spaghetti with a fork. ✅ "Realistic" AI video of Will Smith eating spaghetti with a spoon. ❌

[@a_alex_l2041]

It's because of country of origin. They just didn't teach it really to make forks

[@revisit8480]

Damn, AI is almost as soulless as the humans that like it. Really impressive.

[@brickDOTbrock]

Thank you for commenting this I was so upset to see literally nobody else upset with the way he's bashing all the people whose jobs it is to create the things he's making with ai 😭😭 like have fun with it yourself man but it seems like you're actively trying to get these people fired

[@brendolbreadwar2671]

ai going to change the world, its great

[@Erazoth]

this is such a boomer comment

[@brickDOTbrock]

@@Erazoth help me you're so right 💀 still agree with it tho

[@elviswilliams1131]

kinda rude ngl but in my opinion ai is just gonna be a great tool for humanity

[@Ali_Alhakeem]

15:17 lmao this caught me off gaurd

[@Otchengazoom]

I'm an electronic music producer and we spectated the same situation in 2000s when $1 billion cost mixing consoles in a special buildings were replaced by $200 cost software at your bedrooms. In a 2010 you had complete symphonic orchestra under your fingertips. And now you have even singing software which sounds extremely natural for just $150 and free LLM which can generate unlimited lyrics in seconds. Yes, lots of jobs will disappear. Some people (who explore new technologies and opportunities) will become very famous which wouldn't be possible for them without these technologies. It's just how nature and the evolution works: people invent new tools and competition becomes more hard. The difference is just in speed of changes. It took a centuries at the ancient times, but it takes just a year at present. It's just a life ...

[@AfifFarhati]

indeed , people just have to invest in their ability to anticipate and adapt , i know it's not simple but we don't have a choice really....

[@yamusa85]

I'm here for augmentations and robo-prosthetics, the rest will fade just as quick as it appeared. The era of media consumption is going down faaaast.

[@Paladinoocara]

@@AfifFarhati ►people just have to invest in their ability to anticipate and adapt◄ Unfortunately, that's not the case. We have a huge limitation on learning and the evolution of AI is so fasta we have no chance "adapting" and "learning new stuff" as any new thing you might learn AI can do better, faster and cheaper.

[@jichaelmorgan3796]

I agree with ya

[@krunkle5136]

There's so much junk produced now that no one even needs to learn to play a keyboard.

[@ItsCoderDan]

OpenAI all thought sora would never release because of how good it is but all they did was get their competition to start working on ai videos, they are gonna release it with no limitations at this point because everyone else already has

[@AfifFarhati]

Did they say this or is it just speculation? i don't get why they would assume that , I think they just thought they were ahead , not that no one would ever do it...

[@MartinZanichelli]

We don´t know how many times they tried until they made those beautiful perfect videos. Anyway, Sora is a bit better than all the products now.

[@mr.electronx9036]

shows videos in 240p resolution: is this real?

[@a_alex_l2041]

Man the fact that you already struggle when it is so young and so bad and so low quality tells us everything.

[@pwnomega4562]

@@a_alex_l2041 he's got a point this videos were horribly low resolution. regardless i was able to discern most of them. on the ones i missed however it would been nice if they weren't so low quality videos.

[@thehowlingvoid2480]

​@@pwnomega4562Go to setting ⚙️, go to quality, and change the quality to your liking

[@thehowlingvoid2480]

You can change resolution in settings ⚙️

[@explorerofmind]

If you hadn’t kept asking if I thought this was real I would’ve thought all of them were real, except for the close-up of the old woman and the piano with two sets of hands.

[@stopgeorge]

How cute that people a few years ago were saying actors will soon be obsolete. We're talking about the entire industry being obsolete soon. It just hit me that this may create even more of an echo-chamber effect with ideas and communication. We thought social media was bad. Wait until everyone will be able to create their own Hollywood movie based on their own personalized sense of values, ideals and ethics. I fear nobody is going to adapt and change with the times. Why would you when everyone can create their own reality? Scary scary thought! This is going to fuel isolationalism that probably may lead to even more conflict amongst those that have learned to be uncompromising through this technology.

[@FeroxX_Gosu]

Yup

[@astralyd]

Actors are real individuals and will always be more interesting. Leave your echo chamber

[@stopgeorge]

@@astralyd So are family doctors. But they will also be replaced .

[@revisit8480]

You are right in one point: It will get stale. When everything is AI generated, and AI learns from what we feed it, then it will generate the same things over and over - with only mild differences. If you think this will take out an entire industry you are sorely mistaken. The advent of CG art didn't take out actors, but what it did for sure was take out any sort of real movie - where people act around props, rather than an empty blue room later filled in with CG. What you can always hope for is more slop to consume. AI does a great job with this, or rather: The prompters are doing a good job fulfilling their own empty desires.

[@no.1spidey-fan182]

BEST take on this so far💯. Humanity wasnt ready gor social media and look at what that did...we're finallly experiencing the fallout. Now 10 years later they're making AI

[@Starlour]

2025 is about to be wild

[@theAIsearch]

indeed

[@sgill4833]

Rest of humanities future after the singularity. A new era.

[@treepalds3978]

Somebody gotta work hard to make 2025 wild

[@veenasuresh7054]

No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth. If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult. You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.

[@user-em7rt4uf3z]

And the future of our society will be so fckin stupid💀

[@--Mike--]

I haven't seen the full video yet, but the pianist doesn't wear a ring on his/her left hand while the mirroring image of the hand does.

[@theAIsearch]

good catch!

[@fishygaming793]

And the reflections of his hand occasionally move trough the wood onto the real keynotes.

[@DraxilSpada-vc2wg]

The way the keys are pressed down tend to merge together, like the keys on top look pressed, but the ends of them look like one solid piece.

[@IamSH1VA]

Also, fingers literally coming out of Mirror and pushes the keys

[@Defensive_Wounds]

That was how I noticed that one. Plus, most of these type of AI videos are soft and not very detailed - like a PS3 game or something...lol

[@TayWoode]

I play piano so I could tell as the keys weren’t in the right sequence of two black, three black between the white keys. There was two then two then four then they disappeared when pressed

[@TayWoode]

@@mrchip13 you’d be surprised how many people will think it’s real, like those AI photos of open plan log retreats with a pool in the living room and stairs above the fireplace that finish at a dead end and people say “where is this? Looks amazing, I’d love to stay there”

[@19751222]

The key was gone when it is pressed✌️

[@LaNoir.]

@@TayWoode And for exactly those people is this channel, telling them how incredible this shit looks. 1 brain cell zombies. Humanity is devolving.

[@josecolon5750]

The fingers also pop out of the reflective varnish like some kind of reality bending marvel character.

[@BlackArroToons]

In 2024, many AI generated trailers look like they're all in slow motion and morphing, so that is a major hurdle to overcome. But if it won't take long to improve, then AI Filmmaking is just another form of competition with varying results. Creating art the traditional way with learned art skills will not go obsolete, speaking as an artist.

[@Crazy_Based_Mf]

Precisely. And people who make traditional art shouldn't be afraid. If you make real, quality stuff, you should be pissed off at the current industry. Which is filled with talentless hacks who create absolute slop, and put it in museums as "art". Those people are worthless to the industry. Meanwhile dome dude on youtube creates a stunning masterpiece with like chalk or something. That guy is irreplaceable.

[@drp111]

I don't believe it will replace traditional film making. These tools will complement existing methods. But they will vanish many jobs in the field of advertising.

[@richardinacan]

Give it 5 -10 years, entire movies from single prompts.

[@channeling764]

Ad agencies are done. All marketing and visuals are already starting to be done internally.

[@livlaughlove4646]

THAT'S THE POINT!!!!!!

[@TheCreativeNick]

​@@richardinacan If you want mediocre slop then sure. The whole idea of a film being made from a single prompt is incredibly ignorant of how great films are made.

[@Kayceepeece]

​@@TheCreativeNickwith the right tools and prompt, your words will mean nothing soon. Always remember that this is as bad as AI is ever going to be

[@MateoTeos]

Am I the only one who is not interested in closed source AI tools? Kinda tired of paying to create legal training data for such companies. Especially when they do not share research papers. And I must add that to create something actually usable with AI - you need to have actual skills and experience in that field. Good for exploring concepts - bad as final output, and terrible if you need to change even a small detail.

[@Yeet42069]

Eh, the last statement depends on the progress of other tools. You can make some decent effects with reference pictures and ai video now, maybe not something that is 100% accurate to the source, but for certain work (like effects) it doesn't need to be. Same goes for models if we are talking about 3d mesh generation through 2d images or 3d video. Eventually, you obviously still need expertise in the given field. But it being bad for final output and terrible for transformation is not necessarily a rule.

[@freemygrandma8752]

I knew it was real because of the mole on her chin driving

[@theAIsearch]

yes! AI characters won't have these flaws

[@UlyssesDrax]

The mole on her chin was driving?

[@Loddfafnisodr]

@@UlyssesDrax She was driving with her chin, dummy.

[@3isr3g3n]

Eye movements were my clue

[@freemygrandma8752]

@@UlyssesDrax if you feed it enough, yes

[@JacobEngelMusic]

2:10 As a pianist, I could easily tell this was AI generated (the keys would switch between black and white when they were pressed and they would morph in to each other) But I'm shocked at how clean the video looks overall, even displaying somewhat proper technique with the hands. And the others totally fooled me at times XD

[@mamihashimoto1429]

The piano playing one was missing the wedding band on the reflection, so I guessed it was AI-generated.

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

That one was really obvious.

[@veenasuresh7054]

No camera, no artist, no director, no big cost, professional videos can be created by ai. At first, all this may seem very interesting and beneficial. But whoever you said earlier to avoid (camera, director, artist, crew... etc.), it is a community with them that helps the economic and social survival of this earth. If the human is not able to maintain interest and interest in the work being done, then the work will be unpleasant for him, same is the life of the contents created by AI. The way you support ai so much shows your true taste and interest in art. Very difficult. You know how long people will enjoy you and your content, but by then things will have gone out of people's hands.

[@infographistehistorichaiti5929]

My goodness! This is going break so many industries if this keeps up.

[@manonamission2000]

legal firms likely won't let that happen

[@CuriousChronicles82275]

It's inevitable.

[@DDosAndDonts]

it will only impact production studios that aren't making good stuff anyway.

[@vectoralphaSec]

Eventually money will go away, and humanity will have to move away from currency and economies.

[@dirremoire]

It's F/x that's going to get the axe first. 1-2 minutes is all you need for an explosion, car chase, closeup of an alien, etc. CGI is dead.

[@_UpVector_]

The “hollywood is so over” comment finds me quite skeptical and I’ll tell you why: if you knew how many times we have to tweak all the components that go into VFX shots, from modeling to layout, animation, shading, lighting and compositing, not just because they’re not ok, but because they have to match a director’s idea 100% (aka pixel-fuc*ing), you’d realize there is no way this stuff can replace us. There is no way a director, let alone a producer, will be able to make a movie on their own or even with a limited crew, just using AI. There will always be the need for people to enter prompts. So, if anything, this could become an extremely boring job, not nearly as exciting as making vfx shots. And eventually you know what? They’ll ask some compositor to fix the ai errors. And there you go again… making movies (especially blockbusters) is an extremely complicated and laborious art.

[@laurking6577]

Yes it will just you wait

[@garystinten9339]

It's not too far away.. I assure you within the decade.. they'll have it nutted out. And you'll never hear about the movie studios firing 100s of employees because of "restructuring"..

[@danunpronounceable8559]

​@@laurking6577 no it won't. Most people are just not very creative, so it'll still come down to creatives to create. All AI will do is cut out alot of jobs by streamlining the filmmaking process, and possibly make films more samey, concentrating profits for shareholders. You can't make a whole film using AI, it'll always be kinda shit.

[@astralyd]

i won't watch some generated garbage what's the point, I want to see something that took some effort

[@laurking6577]

@@astralyd yes but very soon you wont be able to guess whats real and whats not

[@tomatom9666]

Honestly, I guessed about 80% of the videos correctly. You can tell quite easily from the unnatural movement of organic things and small details, and how sometimes things that happen are disembodied and don't make sense upon close inspection. And If I saw a movie that used this quality of AI video, I would be appalled, because it would be too blatant. But in skilled hands, in combination with VFX, great potential! The main issue right now is how this stuff tricks plebs on the internet, especially in the third world. Right now, there are many people who believed that the US caused the earthquakes in Turkey via some underground technology. I spoke to such people. Never underestimate how stupid people can be.

[@Crazy_Based_Mf]

My main fear is how this will be used as a tool to control

[@dylanm.3692]

Anyone else notice how all the AI human movements look like they're animated? Especially head movements. Quick, sudden movements between static poses that they stay in for *just* too long.

[@RJKhey]

Yes it's pretty much characteristic. Lots and lots of effort being put into anatomy that follows physics and natural movement.

[@rangerCG]

Hollywood isn't over because though the progress might seem fast, the progress in actually controlling generative AI, video in particular is very slow, nearly nonexistent.I think this might be because in a way, AI itself is only responsible for the speed of development of the video quality. People are responsible for its customizability. As far as visual fx technology, if it's not customizable, it doesn't really hold a candle to existing visual effects software. Right now generative video is helpful but it's basically loosely customizable stock footage.

[@Mio96O-O]

Love how only a few months ago people are saying "ain't no way ai this bad stealing my job" and now here we are....

[@jasondinalt3470]

where?

[@HewLibTaco]

it's still not anywhere near that point. And to be honest, it never will. All this will do is create a tool that actual professionals can use to add to their process. Point being, random people with no experience in any given field of art where AI is "taking over" will not succeed. Even with AI, the only people that will succeed are the people that are passionate about those given art fields. Anybody who is actually passionate or interested in film for example wouldn't want to just use AI anyway, and anybody who isn't that kind of passionate to the point where they only use AI just won't be able to make a good movie, because obviously there is more to a film than just "producing a shot". Basically, maybe AI can become a tool that artists can use to integrate into their workflow, and those people might beat out other aritsts who refuse to use AI at all, but without any actual experience in whatever art the AI is apart of, without the hand of an actual artist, the know how and skill to properly integrate the AI into their process in a way that is a means to an end and not the end itself, AI will not effect anything, and will never replace anything either.

[@JohnDoe-id5ih]

​@@HewLibTaco Cope

[@XHALE303]

@@HewLibTaco While you certainly have a point, it has an effect & is replacing certain jobs & crafts as we speak.

[@saunterfilms]

It's still pretty bad

[@oldkipper]

i have yet to see ai do much beyond stock footage. When you can prompt human interaction at an emotional level things will become interesting.

[@FeelsOldMan]

Oh, so in a few months then?.

[@agi.kitchen]

You already can

[@krunkle5136]

Don't know why people want to replace themselves with technology.

[@Slimburger24]

Book script to movie?

[@mcrain1283]

@@krunkle5136 its the next step in evolution! you see, humans are just too fragile and stupid and temporary to keep going

[@RenderingUser]

If only 50% of the videos are fake, that means I still get passing grade if I mark everything as fake

[@VoidiumTheEye]

12/17 are fake, that's more than 50%

[@LinkoftheDepths]

Last I remember 50% is not a passing grade.

[@RenderingUser]

@@LinkoftheDepths depends on the school

[@StefanSchade721229]

I think you're right - in the sense that all of them would be possible by ai

[@XACTIC_Valour]

.... "no need to hire a film team to make commercials".... thats literally the worst outcome... ppl deserve jobs, and with the way the economy is going, this is only going to hurt society more

[@revisit8480]

Soulless commercials made by AI or... Soulless commercials made by humans I do fine without either, but it concerns me you are worried about THIS rather than anything else worrying about AI lol

[@XACTIC_Valour]

@@revisit8480 so you're in team fuck the artists then.... cool

[@kevinsm2039]

The first two were pretty easy to tell the sci-fi room was also easy to tell because AI typically likes to move the camera around like that. The girl in the fireplace was easy to tell because AI typically uses the same smile format when creating these kind of images, The concert was actually realistic until the last part were cloud made it look fake. The fakest one of them all was a sunflower girl and the old wrinkly lady. I caught the real ones because I feel like there was some reverse psychology going on and you pick something that would look easier for AI to generate

[@theAIsearch]

thx for sharing!

[@freemygrandma8752]

Gymnastics when you fly on your job application

[@GustavBoye-cs9vz]

0:23 - Two guys on the beach merging into one person. A hand with a thumb where the pinky finger should be. "I don't know about you, but this looks pretty real to me"

[@Seshua87]

Hollywood doesn't need AI to be over. They doing just fine on they/their own.

[@crackedblack1410]

I always said it and will always say it:Many people seem to think that AI is just another tool that won‘t replace much stuff, but AI WILL improve constantly and it is about to catch up to our abilities.

[@cezarynowak5186]

Being amazed at first with all this AI video hype, now I am a bit more sceptical. Mostly because those are still single footages. Maybe it can work in some ads where you don't really need to follow any detailed script, just put some random shots in between the frames. And only when there are no people in the scenes, because they still look very "off". But in Holywood? C'mon, let's be real. Producing a movie, a music video, an animation - it is really much more than promting some random videos. You need to have so much more control over the footage. I animated couple of cartoons and can't really see ANY advanteges in using AI. It is really very detailed work, where you hove tons of layers stacked on each other, with many effects, masks, everything is heavily keyframed. So at the moment it is really nothing more than a extended version of stock videos market. Will see how it will develop in next years. For now - just a toy.

[@astralyd]

I thought it was horrible and distopic and now I think it's still horrible and distopic.

[@thehipsterhamster1929]

Bro it's about the rate of improvement of the AI

[@daleelliott7390]

Yeah I think there's a lot of ignorance coming from people who have no idea about all the fine details that go into every department in making an actual film, tv series or commercial etc. This is just another example of a bubble that will burst because it doesn't seem remotely sustainable in the long run. Look at how people were using chatgpt a year ago because it was basically free only for them to flick a switch and limit the tools non paying users could use.

[@EmeraldView]

For a second there I thought you were identifying every black man eating spaghetti as Will Smith. 😄

[@blisphul8084]

These AI generators often have policies to not generate real people, so people are generating the closest thing to Will Smith eating spaghetti.

[@KayButtonJay]

The problem people miss is that you’re always going to need great quality videos in your training data. And humans need to do that. And not any humans. It requires skill. Often years or decades of skill in cinematography

[@usuariob4948]

So you are telling me that now we can have a better version of "The Rock eating rocks" or "Vin Dysel drinking dysel"?!?

[@JeremyBX]

You know it's especially fake when you have to question "why the hell would someone take the time to professionally film something like that?". There's no direction anywhere in the AI generations. No begginning Middle and end.

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

Please tell me why someone would film 7 but not 6, or 3 but 4.

[@bigglyguy8429]

They all look like AI other than some landscapes.

[@TheCreativeNick]

This technology is really impressive and I'm curious to learn more about how these models work, including how they were trained (we cannot forget about the actual artists whose work made these kinds of models possible in the first place!) However, I disagree about how this will change Hollywood and traditional filmmaking in general. What many fail to realize is that the process of making art is just as, if not more important than, the result. They want to go from A to C as fast as possible, that they forget about B. Traditional film-making is deeply rooted in artistic intention and vision. For instance, take music videos, which you pretty frequently in this video. The dance choreography is created by experts with actual intention in mind to match the song's rhythm, lyrics, and the artist's message. In narrative filmmaking, every single character expression, environment, piece of dialogue, keyframe, etc is made with purpose and direction. Directors and cinematographers carefully compose each shot, set designers build environments that help reflect the tone of the scene, and actors will refer to sensitive, personal experiences to better bring out dialogue. Even in animation, every keyframe is deliberately placed to convey even the most nuanced of emotions. Filmmakers and artists in general pour their personal experiences, emotions, and unique perspectives into every aspect of their work. You could argue that using detailed prompts to "direct" the AI is the same as directing a team of actual filmmakers. However, unlike humans, AI lacks personal experiences, emotional attachments, or genuine understanding of the world. It's literally a machine, incapable of drawing from lived experiences or emotional depth to inform its creations. When a director asks an actor to convey a complex emotion, the actor draws from their own life experiences. Generative AI, no matter how sophisticated the prompt, cannot replicate this level of depth of human experience and emotion. And I think portraying the need to hire actors, cinematographers, etc as a bad thing is pretty close-minded. We often forget how beneficial a collaborative environment can be. Working with people who all specialize in various fields allows everyone to pitch in their own ideas, their own experiences, and own spin to the film in a cohesive way. And if you just want to make a film all by yourself, you still can! You don't necessarily need to hire a whole team of people to make good films; there's numerous solo films on KZbin that rival fully-fledged Hollywood blockbusters. It's more important about whether or not you're willing to learn and put in the work. If you don't want to put in any effort, don't expect a good result. I find the idea of relying entirely on a machine honestly quite sad, especially when you are more than fully capable of learning it yourself. With that being said, AI just seems like a mock-up tool at best. There can definitely be valid use-cases for AI as an ASSISTIVE tool, but outright replacing all artists is simply unrealistic. Even then, a great filmmaker may only need a rough, 15-second storyboard drawing to envision it on the big screen (such as Rian Johnson's infamous Knives Out storyboard drawing!). Also, the last thing I want is to have KZbin be flooded with automated AI music videos or films made by people who just want to make a quick buck.

[@laurking6577]

We all know it but it will get to a point when it can replicate artistic intention and vision

[@revisit8480]

@@laurking6577 Yeah, tell AI to tell you about the intentions of artists who are no longer alive. And what was the vision Da Vinci? He first drew humans, then exhumed, and was also working on military machinery - along with flying machines. Clearly he wanted to turn humans into wooden boxes for war!!!!!! You are demented.

[@tomatom9666]

@@laurking6577 Can you explain how this would happen? Are you assuming that intention and vision are definable concepts? Is this a transhumanist religious assumption, that AI will fully replicate the human being?

[@loopwhiletrue]

Gymnasts are the new Will Smith

[@LeVolture]

The fashionshow was easy to spot as AI because almost no one was looking at the model

[@jackdreamer2000]

as an artist, ai scares me, and It seems that actors are soon to experience my fear

[@1cpascal]

Hollywood has been in decline for many years, and I think that this could mean it's final end. For far too long, Hollywood has dominated the viewpoints that are presented in society merely because it has access to the massive infrastructure that making films traditionally required. But now that films can be made by anybody with access to a computer, I think we're going to see a much wider variety of films made for many different viewpoints and tastes.

[@krisstopher8259]

good to get rid of woke hollywood

[@VaderandRodaregoatedfr]

RIP Wokewood

[@Producerukoh]

Hollywood will only be over when faces and people are consistent and can be directed. Otherwise this is and immensely powerful tool.

[@abdulhai4977]

The speed with which advances are happening, I'm guessing it could literally be a few months when this is solved.

[@sneedsfeedandseed1795]

@@abdulhai4977delusional 😂

[@IvanMrsicStudio]

@@abdulhai4977 It's been a few months already and this issue is far from solved.

[@hugo9618]

Finally, we do not need those expensive actors to make superhero movies

[@a.n.o3414]

generally superhero movies sucks ngl

[@gormlick8085]

Are you okay with actors losing their livelihoods or is this comment a joke

[@marsupialmestre9088]

@@gormlick8085 The comment is probably a joke, but there are people out there who are genuinely like this, and that's why AI exists and is evolving the way it is in the first place.

[@adviththegreat5610]

@@marsupialmestre9088 Man, I don't know what those people think but I don't agree, I also don't agree with the people who think AI is going to enslave humanity. What I agree with and fear the most, is the few people holding the entire world in their hands with the power of AI and we all will be living in a fake real world in just a few years and no one (not even the upper class) are completely ready for this change. I wish I was born 500 years ago or in 1950s or something and died during covid.

[@gormlick8085]

@@marsupialmestre9088 it better be a joke

[@JeremyBX]

So there's this whole discussion about AI programs stealing art, but I'm genuinely curious just how much extra material Kling has taken compared to competitors to make their generations as accurately good as they are.

[@garystinten9339]

14:19 cling looks awesome and pretty much better than anything pixar has done in their entire existence

[@JishinimaTidehoshi]

well pixar is more about storytelling than anything else

[@revisit8480]

You like CG slop "art". Good for you.

[@stefthorman8548]

​@@revisit8480thats you, ai art is better

[@Stank-Mania]

Everything about this is evil. There is nothing good about lazy unskilled people gaining instant gratification from generated movies.

[@aclutchboy5389]

Okay, dont use a car then... Actually dont even use an computer... What you said is so stupid it's actually insane.

[@astralyd]

@@aclutchboy5389 he's right, your comparaison make no sense

[@user-uf2df6zf5w]

​@@astralyd well, there is nothing good about lazy people driving, when they should have walked. Thats undeserved convenience they should not have, it makes them weaker... All this "instant gratification" talk reminds me of the manosphere nonsence floating around lately.

[@astralyd]

@@user-uf2df6zf5w You know i kinda feel bad for you and others. If you were an artist, you'd understand that what's great about art is the creative process. It's a joy that only making it yourself can bring. And it saddens me that some people have to claim a mixmash of other people's work as their own to feel anything. And yes, I feel a little better when I cycle to work because I've been exercising and not polluting. Well then just imagine that but 10x

[@revisit8480]

@@user-uf2df6zf5w >Driving a car for 200 km is "instant" gratification >Using a computer to write a book is "instant" gratification Yep. Those are very sane samples of "instant gratification" from a very sane human. No doubt AI will benefit your complete sanity.

[@Mizuumisan]

10/10 those uncanny frames can't fool anybody, I still don´t get why people is afraid of this technology, it got better yeah, but it still has a long way to look real.

[@paul1979uk2000]

You know what is really frightening for the creative industry? We are only talking around 2 short years and look at the progress we have seen with A.I. If this pace continues or potentially speeds up as we find more useful use cases for this tech, you really have to wonder where A.I. will be in 10 years. The best thing that could have happened to A.I. is the hype train around it that brought it to mass market, that on its own is bringing in a lot of investment, ideas and pushing the tech far more than what we were seeing when it was just an experimental toy in some corporate lab, you have to imagine that as A.I. becomes more useful in more areas, the ideas and investment could go through the roof. Honestly, I pity the fools that think A.I. is just a fad or a bubble ready to burst, and yes, the bubble might deflate somewhat as things calm down, but it's clear as day that A.I. is here to stay and only going to keep rapidly get better, and far more interest and money is going to be thrown at it as A.I. becomes more useful in more areas, in other words, we are only just starting, and that is exciting and scary at the same time. What's really impressed me the most is how much better small open source locally run A.I. models have got, I remember just two years ago, the quality wasn't that great, and even thought there's still work to do, the quality on many of the A.I. models we can run locally on our computers are way better than just two years ago, and I really do wonder, how far can they push the quality for a given size model.

[@tomatom9666]

I agree with you that AI is here to stay and will grow fast, but it's not going to be what people expect. At first, people will attempt to replace VFX artists, actors, stock footage etc. which is the natural impulse in a new medium. Later, though, it will become it's own thing. When film was first tested, the first Silent Films were mostly imitating the art of Theatre. But they quickly parted ways in the next few decades with Charlie Chaplin, Griffith etc. It is crude at first and only a novelty, later becoming something else. The human perspective will still be a requirement, and making something in 5 minutes is not the same as spending 2 years on the same thing, the quality of thought is different.

[@EchoLandscape]

Its pretty easy to spot the AI and the real ones. got it 100% right without problems.

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

No it isn’t. Stop with the smug ego stroking.

[@EchoLandscape]

@@Dennis-nc3vw no, it really is.

[@seto007]

I'll be completely honest with you: every example you showed of Kling looked significantly better than every example you showed of Runway Gen 3

[@MaximGhost]

This was exactly why all those Hollywood peeps went on strike a few months back and insisted on AI be locked out out of content creation. Nice to see that they will be completely discarded as both obsolete and expensive.

[@tigerxplso]

16/17 no way i got the last one wrong :( When you know there is a possibility of an AI generated content its super easy to spot it, but if you just showed me those videos without context i would not be able to tell at all

[@theAIsearch]

thx for sharing! the last one is tricky

[@AKU666]

Definitely i have lower score, but last one i started to thought about AI by looking on boots. For me it's was kinda weird motion blur.

[@johannesdolch]

We are literally months away from being able to create entire movies with AI. Meaning you can personalize them.

[@nodell8729]

Will see. So far we are always months away from AGI everywher.

[@zipf1364]

this is amazing .. and then i realised how many jobs are going to be lost we may not have a world left to enjoy its fruits

[@pumpnix7243]

I got them all but the fireworks! 1. The hair does not move naturally 2. The hands are the giveaway 4. Lucky guess, just seemed too perfect for me 6. Her neck and smile, but mostly lucky guess 8. Obviously 11. The smoke looks unnatural and the phones of the “people” 12. The flower petals moved unnaturally and the woman just looks fake 13. Clouds disappeared quickly and the sky changed colours 14. Nightmare inducing! Looks like her skin is crawling! 16. No ring on the finger but one in the reflection 17. The dress movement is odd and some of the people in the crowd especially the last look have fingers that are like 9 inches long

[@ddeeffmusicarts]

No way, I got everything right! Who else?

[@daddymememaster5432]

Same

[@quakerdx5435]

I only got 3 wrong, but u can clearly tell it’s ai based in the movement.

[@kek621k]

Not the AI bros glazing this video 😭

[@bradtrounson]

You can still tell to a degree with elements of unrealistic or repeated motion . Hair & clothing for example.

[@BobBrown-x8z]

Bro just flipped us off. 15:18😂😂😂

[@John-ct9zs]

I think I got about 60% right, a little over half. These are getting really good. The rock star one was a clear fake out. Some of the nature ones fooled me though, and they are the easiest to spot, but the drone over the cliff got me, as did the fireworks. The lady driving a car, I thought that was AI, but it was real.

[@Willywonka-e4w]

Well, I just have to acceptthe death of my animation job

[@Smile200-z4y]

GG bro. Now go save someone life and be a doctor or something

[@amadeus7511]

Good luck with getting a decent residence

[@mohamadashrafsazali7042]

For now just keep doing as a hobby or side activity. Remember, sometimes you create because you love to. And who knows, maybe it’ll be a rare skill that people want, since everyone will be too lazy

[@abgrafix]

With time ai too will become complex to use and not everyone will be able to give a good prompt either ... When everyone will have the power to generate videos or animations just by prompts I am pretty sure most of them will be churning out average content (today's fascinating will definitely become tomorrow's average ) and people who do it better will have jobs . There is always going to be people who do it better and hence jobs won't disappear completely... Many new roles will be created many will be destroyed. That's for sure . It has started to happen as well ... We have billboard actors replaced with ai generated imageries

[@AirneonMC]

me trying to find a chinese friend but not finding one. 😭

[@krisstopher8259]

move to china

[@capitanwinters4422]

Go to China Town :v

[@shagb2751]

2:16 Ring in reflection, but not on her actual finger.😋

[@UlyssesDrax]

Good catch!

[@theAIsearch]

good spot

[@erosgritti5171]

1 spaghetti should not be eaten with a spoon. 2 the spaghetti must be twisted

[@EclipseStrife]

The balancing beam stuff is interesting. My initial thought was that's how crazy gymnast's are on that beam doing the tricks, the AI watches all the samples of it and comes to the conclusion people must be warping around to accomplish such a feat !!

[@terranova8890]

AI is not a sentient being yet, it aint watching or coming to any conclusions lol, it's just not programmed correctly yet...

[@Crazy_Based_Mf]

​@@terranova8890it will never reach sentience

[@SocialSophia]

*I see why you have so many subs, you came in with the sauce. You mentioned all of the websites and how to use em, very detailed for novices. Thanks*

[@JustJeff777]

AI is catching up to us, but I could tell most of what was AI at first. AI still has an uncanniness to it

[@InnerEagle]

3:22 how's real? How? Her nose tip moves out! Literally, you can check it by yourself! 4:24 Reflection touching the real keys, that must be real

[@Ultimine1]

Maybe she moved a muscle that did that, also the reflection of the ring isnt showing with the piano guy

[@official.EasyRock]

4:24 no ring on the hand while there is a ring in reflection.

[@InnerEagle]

@@Ultimine1 If was only for the ring, it literally goes toward the "real" keys to play ahhaha

[@Crazy_Based_Mf]

This is gonna be revolutionary. Like seriously. Its honestly kind of hard to comprehend just how insane this will be.

[@vectoralphaSec]

What would happen if all of Hollywood, every movie studio, every tv studio, every video game developer, every anime/ animation studio all of them in the entirety went out of business? How would that affect humanity and society as a whole? What would the world look like then?

[@Vytelux]

I HATE AI I HATE AI I HATE AI I HATE AI I HATE AI

[@revisit8480]

I HATE FURRIES I HATE FURRIES I HATE FURRIES I HATE FURRIES I HATE FURRIES and AI

[@mobins127]

am I the only one that guessed it all correctly? like there's so many clues in there.

[@agi.kitchen]

I got one wrong, the woman driving , only because looking out the window objects appear but agreed, soooo many clues

[@BlackTakGolD]

remember, you are fully focused on getting it right with hindsight of a test, others will not pick up on it that aren't as primed

[@bertoness77]

"Nothing is real, we are living in simulation". - say a Theory Conspirator with weird pronoun.

[@Arperture]

One thing to consider about Runway Gen3: its pro plan gives you unlimited generation in Gen 3, and the time it takes to run generations in Explorer mode is really about the same as the generation time using credits. If you are using the service commercially, and charging clients for your work, this actually is a great deal. Also, Gen 3 works with Lip Sync allowing you to make MV with actually singing.

[@XanderLeoShiller]

..."and then there's this woman driving? " ...uhh looks VERY REAL ALL THE TIME! AHH NEXT!"

[@maxrigaud8493]

God ai looks so bad

[@danielontiveros1633]

Honestly it's still pretty easy to know which ones are AI generated, sorry to say it but it is the truth.

[@freemygrandma8752]

Idk I’m scared

[@ShaneMcGrath.]

Be scared if they just use it for BS like this such as art/entertainment, Be optimistic if they pull their finger out and actually use A.I. properly for research to find cures for diseases.

[@livlaughlove4646]

YEA! YOU SHOULD BE.

[@freemygrandma8752]

@@livlaughlove4646 you’re clearly a killer AI robot trying to warn me

[@YoungBlaze]

Don't worry I'll hold you we'll get through this together

[@calicoesblue4703]

Yep, the writing is on the wall. It's great in my opinion, it allows for entertainment outside of Hollywood and you can have a category of films that you can look up that you are interested in and it allows for creative people who can't get into Hollywood to find success doing what they love.

[@gizzly50]

I'm glad you still can see what is AI in the details - for example the weirdly behaving back flowing water at the beach in 1:44 or the strange movement of the piano keys and the non existent but mirrored ring in 2:12. But of course it is going to be a hard time for stock footage makers because most clients are going to be completely ok with "almost real" ...

[@honestlymars]

I get that it's tempting to say that we don't need to spend money to make commercials for lemonade or music videos, but what we're forgetting are a few key things: It's illegal to make commercials for any food product using CGI. It's something to do with false advertisement. As such the studios making food ads have to invent very crazy contraptions for making those shots where the ingredients are flying around the frame. Part of the value of watching a music video is knowing that your favorite celebrity did that for real, that the team really have the dance moves or the cinematography to go with their music. An AI generated MV won't have the soul of a real MV that contains something we call "an indexical reference" to real world things. Just like celluloid is said to have more tangibility than digital, digital has more soul than Gen AI video. Don't forget you're basically looking at the hallucinations of a rock we tricked into doing math for us

[@bentonpix]

The low res softness of this video makes determining what is real very difficult because many of the telltale signs of AI are revealed as the resolution increases. Keep it all soft and a lot of it will pass.

[@kirby4667]

I got 3 Incorrect, The Man talking on the beach, The Beach and the Fashion Show

[@l33t00r]

When the first fully computer animated film debuted in theaters around the year 2000, everyone lamented the fact that in 10 years there would be no actors left. It simply won't happen that quickly, and the AI ​​won't change much about it.