F-16 Fighter Jet How it Works | 4th Generation Multirole Fighter F16

  Рет қаралды 846,082

AiTelly

AiTelly

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 654
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Go to ground.news/AiTelly to stay fully informed on breaking news, compare coverage and avoid media bias. Try it out or subscribe through my link for 30% off unlimited access before June 30 and get it for as little as $5 a month.
@mach150
@mach150 Жыл бұрын
Request k 2 black panther please.....😢
@LordEmperorHyperion
@LordEmperorHyperion Жыл бұрын
It was the F18 Hornet that replaced the F14 Tomcat not the F16 Fighting Falcon, you might want to check your sources.
@emac7858
@emac7858 Жыл бұрын
"This is enteier of f16 falcon" that is first sentence wich you say and its terrible(and you start talking about stick and that let it and latter you back to it. It is terrible😢).. You shoud never again start wideo like that. For first you need to say this is f16.. and next you going through partd of plane. I hope you going to implemet this in next video.yust look how you sarting your old video about tejas or tu 95. That is nice
@ivaylovitanov9389
@ivaylovitanov9389 Жыл бұрын
AMAZING VIDEOS AND CHANNEL AS ALWAYS! 👏 🙌 👌 😊
@antoniok4735
@antoniok4735 Жыл бұрын
Can you make a video about the U-2 spy plane please and the sr-71 blackbird.
@anselmdanker9519
@anselmdanker9519 Жыл бұрын
The F 16 was not the successor of the F 14 Tomcat. The F 16 was the winner of the light weight fighter competition. The F 14 's successor is the F 18 Hornet derived from the YF 17 that lost the light weight fighter competition.
@albclean
@albclean Жыл бұрын
Correct! 🧠
@JanChvojka
@JanChvojka Жыл бұрын
correct, F-16 was replacement of F-4 Phantom II and F-105 Thunderchief ... because F-15 Eagle was too expensive
@crewdawg2008
@crewdawg2008 Жыл бұрын
I think they just said it that way because the Navy was shopping for a replacement at the same time as the Air Force, and both looked into the F16, just so happens the Navy decided the hornet fit their needs better, while the Air Force went forward with the 16. It's not that what they said was inaccurate, it was just incomplete.
@eshgholah
@eshgholah Жыл бұрын
Totally agree 👍
@josegaldamez590
@josegaldamez590 Жыл бұрын
Additionally, 5195 Phantoms F-4 were made. Narrator confirms to date 4,500 F-16 units had been built innacurately mentioning it has been the fighter with most units made.
@Just_A_Random_Desk
@Just_A_Random_Desk Жыл бұрын
After watching this video, I think I will go buy myself an F-16!
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
😉 Great hope it helped you at least to start the Jet.
@BipulKumar-lv7mq
@BipulKumar-lv7mq Жыл бұрын
I'm coming with a mig 21
@ralphghost820
@ralphghost820 Жыл бұрын
Can u give me ride out there plz
@lucasguia6030
@lucasguia6030 Жыл бұрын
It’s only like $70 on dcs
@Just_A_Random_Desk
@Just_A_Random_Desk Жыл бұрын
​@@lucasguia6030 who said anything about DCS?
@rudalkun4187
@rudalkun4187 Жыл бұрын
4 reasons why this channel is the best channel in this genre: 1. Unbiased & honest review based on facts from both views 2. Using both imperial & metric measurements 3. Amazing & detailed animations 4. Good & clear grammar, able to describe anything clearly
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks we do make mistakes 😞 But we don't Give up
@businesswoofer
@businesswoofer Жыл бұрын
the sponsors are just hella long
@Jay-jb2vr
@Jay-jb2vr Жыл бұрын
*Jared Owen enters the chat*
@WorldlyBudget
@WorldlyBudget Жыл бұрын
@@Aitelly Compare the F-16 and the F-35 to the SU-57! Thank you for your hard work!
@engineer6674
@engineer6674 Жыл бұрын
No offense to you or the creators of the video but i think Animagraffs is vastly superior in many aspects. Like the amount of detailed information, animation quality and video segments.
@el4cierrarombofsx151
@el4cierrarombofsx151 Жыл бұрын
as a former military pilot I can tell your video is very well elaborated. You did a great job
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot. We try our best to understand the engineering and Mechanics behid it
@nexpro6118
@nexpro6118 Жыл бұрын
Yeah...what aircraft did you fly?
@el4cierrarombofsx151
@el4cierrarombofsx151 Жыл бұрын
@@nexpro6118 SU30, K8W
@MrChickennugget360
@MrChickennugget360 7 ай бұрын
@@Aitelly other than your mistake of saying the F-16 was intended to replace the F-14
@flanker0ne
@flanker0ne Жыл бұрын
F-16 was designed to replace the F-4 Phantom in USAF service, not the F-14 Tomcat in the USN
@SaiTaX_the_Chile_boi
@SaiTaX_the_Chile_boi Жыл бұрын
Yup, tomcat is replaced by F/A-18
@stekin8
@stekin8 Жыл бұрын
F-16 replaced F-5 F-15 and F-14 replaced F-4 F-18 replaced F-14
@2ksnakenoodles
@2ksnakenoodles 5 ай бұрын
Yep, the super hornet took the Tomcat's place
@squarewave808
@squarewave808 Жыл бұрын
1:10 Uhh, what? The F-16 was part of the lightweight tactical fighter competition for the US Air Force. The F-14 was a Navy fighter. The only sort of true thing about this comment is that the F-16’s competitor, the YF-17, evolved into the the F-18 which did support and eventually replace the F-14 in Navy service.
@danielhandika8767
@danielhandika8767 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I was like what? There's always some small mistakes in every video they made, but this is potential misinformation
@thomasvercauteren4587
@thomasvercauteren4587 Жыл бұрын
The bugles on the side of the jet, aft of the nose are also not TWS ,they are missile detection. Small innacuracies being presented with confidence in this video
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Politicians wanted to produce one Aircraft for the Airforce Navy and Marines. But it failed.
@tromba831
@tromba831 Жыл бұрын
@@Aitelly Yes, but this plane was F-111. F-16 was never meant to be replacement of F-14. F-16 from begining was designed to complement F-15 in USAF. YF-17 (latter F-18 Hornet) which loose competition with F-16 became later a NAVY fighter and as modernised version (Super Hornet) replaced F-14.
@PaulJosephdeWerk
@PaulJosephdeWerk Жыл бұрын
The rudder is not used to turn the aircraft left or right. The rudder is used to maintain the position of the nose of the aircraft (so that its going where it's pointing). Turning an aircraft is acheived by rolling the aircraft and pulling up. Depending on how tight turn needs to be more or less roll and more or less up stick is used. Also, the combustion of fuel is further back in the engine, thr frint section is the compressors for compressing the incoming air.
@LolitBasco
@LolitBasco Жыл бұрын
As a Juno: New Origins player, I can confirm this as true and 100% real
@Michiganian8
@Michiganian8 Жыл бұрын
Rudder ?
@johnc1014
@johnc1014 5 ай бұрын
As an engine mechanic, I'm glad I'm not the only one that noticed that combustion error. You have the fan (low pressure compressor), core (high pressure compressor), and then the combustion chamber. Then, there's the HPT and LPT, with the augmentor and exhaust nozzle following.
@PaulJosephdeWerk
@PaulJosephdeWerk 4 ай бұрын
@@johnc1014 I was an F-16 Jet Engine Mechanic when I served in the 80s.
@johnc1014
@johnc1014 4 ай бұрын
@@PaulJosephdeWerk Nice. Our jets were built in the 80s. Did you work on Pratts or GEs?
@TC-en7cu
@TC-en7cu 11 ай бұрын
As a former F-16 crew chief, this was kind of hard to watch
@RAF33Strike
@RAF33Strike 5 ай бұрын
Yeah, I never knew my RWR antennas were TWS radars all along!
@ExecutivePuma
@ExecutivePuma 4 ай бұрын
What specifically is it that you find hard to watch? I’ll trust you more since you worked on the plane
@RA-el6zj
@RA-el6zj 3 ай бұрын
@@TC-en7cu explain why then..
@TC-en7cu
@TC-en7cu 3 ай бұрын
​@ExecutivePuma it was not built to replace the F-14.
@TC-en7cu
@TC-en7cu 3 ай бұрын
​@RA-el6zj it's called a throttle, not thruster. You don't need rwr or standby Adi on to start the jet.
@GLMadrid
@GLMadrid Жыл бұрын
Your side stick labels are correct, except the "view reset" for track IR is the nosewheel steering/missile step button, track IR is a tool used in flight sims to capture head motion when looking around in a virtual cockpit. I also believe is display management system not data management.
@SuperYooper11
@SuperYooper11 8 ай бұрын
Very poorly done research on this topic!
@moonbear2130
@moonbear2130 Жыл бұрын
I don’t recall the F-16 being made to replace the F-14, the jets had completely different missions and were operated by 2 different services, it’s also not the most produced fighter ever as stated, not even the most produced western jet fighter which is the F-4 phantom, perhaps you meant the most produced western 4th gen fighter?
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Politician did - it was all about the Cost of maintaining the F14. they thought the of one Aircraft for the NAvy Airforce and Marines . but it failed
@moonbear2130
@moonbear2130 Жыл бұрын
@@Aitelly indeed, the F-14 was incredibly expensive and retired in favor of the F/A-18 in no small part due to that reason, however the F-16 was developed at roughly the same time period as the F-14, and was developed for entirety different reasons (low cost light weight fighter) for the Air Force than the F-14 for the navy (fleet defense fighter). These 2 aircraft didn’t really have anything to do with each other as their roles were so opposite, so to my knowledge as Iv looked around, I can find no mention of the F-16 even being considered to replace the F-14. However If you’ve read this somewhere and have a source I’d be willing to read it
@syedrayyanshah-lo1kr
@syedrayyanshah-lo1kr 4 ай бұрын
im 17 , watching such videos because im going to be aeronautic engineer and want to collect as many knowledge about jets as much as i can or more.
@carsten9168
@carsten9168 Жыл бұрын
An awesome video showing the F-16's flying capability, specifications, how to fly, fire missiles, armaments, etc. Great job AiTelly !
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks 👍 glad you like it.
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks 👍
@Uknownvlog
@Uknownvlog Ай бұрын
This channel really want me to go to the air force and want to fly a F16
@ElamiteMan
@ElamiteMan 3 ай бұрын
The first country that ordered F-16 was Iran, and in the first order, 160 planes were requested, but after the revolution, the contract was canceled by America, and there was only one F-16 in Iran, which was used for training.
@stephengrinkley9889
@stephengrinkley9889 5 ай бұрын
Who needs to spend 4 years at the Air Force Academy when you can just sub up this channel and learn everything you need to know in minutes 😀
@AR-rf9hc
@AR-rf9hc Жыл бұрын
Please make a video on jf17 thunder
@Aly_Fahmy
@Aly_Fahmy 7 ай бұрын
Gentlemen, we can totally fly this beauty!!
@mxcollin95
@mxcollin95 Жыл бұрын
Awesome video idea!!! Definitely do more of these! There are countless badass planes you guys could do, from the Harrier jump jet to the SR71 there are countless amazing jets that people would love to see a breakdown on. 🤙
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Yes agreed
@Michiganian8
@Michiganian8 Жыл бұрын
SR7 What? I’m so confused
@billferner6741
@billferner6741 Жыл бұрын
I have had a Falcon simulator on my 286 PC in 1984. It was quiet amazing to realice that the turn radius at high speed was way bigger than at low.
@Michiganian8
@Michiganian8 Жыл бұрын
Falcon simulator? Is that a plane
@billferner6741
@billferner6741 Жыл бұрын
@@Michiganian8 the F16 was so called, Falcon, and so the computer program.
@gregoryfuller1136
@gregoryfuller1136 Жыл бұрын
Is "quiet amazing" when you don't say anything out loud (or make any other noises), and just think about it instead? I call it mental astonishment and use it often unconsciously, like when watching videos alone or when verbal utterances would be inappropriate.
@duyphan4617
@duyphan4617 4 ай бұрын
I love that this jet is meant to be low-cost yet still deadly.
@dhananjayroydakua4048
@dhananjayroydakua4048 Жыл бұрын
Next video Rafael fighter jet
@CoCoNutShovel
@CoCoNutShovel Жыл бұрын
The F-16 is not the world’s most widely produced fighter or military aircraft « ever »
@alichahin
@alichahin 7 ай бұрын
jet fighter
@CoCoNutShovel
@CoCoNutShovel 7 ай бұрын
@@alichahinNope. The Mig 21 is the most widely produced jet fighter
@MoskusMoskiferus1611
@MoskusMoskiferus1611 Жыл бұрын
The F-16 is my childhood fighter jet, I used to daydream flying one in real life
@jackson-pl5zg
@jackson-pl5zg Жыл бұрын
Same!
@harris9784
@harris9784 Жыл бұрын
Me too!!
@santripreneur4700
@santripreneur4700 Жыл бұрын
Same wkwkwkwk
@skenzyme81
@skenzyme81 Жыл бұрын
3:45 Roh-Tarry Cannon. That was adorable. 🤗
@bangdoll4500
@bangdoll4500 Жыл бұрын
1. The performance of the F-5, which the U.S. made to South Vietnam in the Vietnam War, was better than expected, and shocked by the maneuverability of the North Vietnamese Mig-21, the U.S. Air Force realizes that cheap, high-performance, lightweight fighter jets are possible. So, LWF is a lightweight, high-performance, half-priced fighter introduction program that complements the high-performance F-15 with numbers, where the YF-16 and YF-17 will be contested and the YF-16 will be chosen to become today's F-16. 2. The F-15 was a high-performance fighter that replaced the U.S. Air Force's F-4 and F-106, but it was too expensive to maintain, and was under budget pressure due to oil shocks and the Vietnam War at the time, so the F-15 could not fully replace the number of the existing F-4s. That's why the LWF program, a new concept of cheap lightweight, high-performance fighter jets, was ordered. 3. The U.S. Navy, which was under the same budget pressure as the U.S. Air Force at the time, was receiving orders from the U.S. Congress to introduce lightweight fighters. So it subsidizes the F-14 and A-6, has a cheap, high-performance, lightweight fighter NACF program to replace the F-4 and A-7, and the U.S. Navy chooses the YF-17, which was already designed to save on development costs, and this is the F/A-18 Legacy Hornet. 4. The F/A-18 Legacy Hornet was built with the same lightweight fighter as the F-16, so it couldn't replace the F-14 because of its small armament and cambat range, so it completely replaces the F-14 by creating a new F-18E/F, which is 40% more in size.
@cacheloproblox8674
@cacheloproblox8674 Жыл бұрын
A little fun fact: The block designations for the F-16 either end with a zero or with a two. If the designations ends with zero, example F-16C Block 50, that means that it uses the General Electric F110 engine, but if the designation ends with a two, example F-16C Block 52, that version has the Pratt and Whitney F100 engine. (Although this applies only to Block 30,32 and forward as that is when the F110 was first introduced to the F-16)
@jonathanwilbertleonardo4790
@jonathanwilbertleonardo4790 Жыл бұрын
Request= Sukhoi Su-35 4++/4,5 Gen Multirole Aircraft
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Noted
@FrontlinePower
@FrontlinePower 16 сағат бұрын
The F 16 was the winner of the light weight fighter competition.
@Hannan_1325
@Hannan_1325 Жыл бұрын
As Always, AiTelly never disappoints. Keep up the good work. As an Aerospace Engineer, I really appreciate your work.
@respectcakeorelse2631
@respectcakeorelse2631 Жыл бұрын
respect your line of work, its mt dream job rn, what company do u work for? im curious and would gladly take some tips :)
@Hannan_1325
@Hannan_1325 Жыл бұрын
@@respectcakeorelse2631 I work for Rolls-Royce Aerospace and Defence. I work on Military Aerospace projects here in the UK. Can't give much information as its related to security classification and export control. But yes apart from that please do concentrate on your studies and make sure to get involved in as much practicle work as you can. Cheers.
@Jaem-ml4lx
@Jaem-ml4lx Жыл бұрын
Wow man, i actually learned more about the F16 in the video
@أحمدالجهني-ع6د
@أحمدالجهني-ع6د Жыл бұрын
I hope the next one will be the f15 my fav. Jet
@cookingstreet9362
@cookingstreet9362 Жыл бұрын
Can you make a video about Rafael aircraft
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Research and Information takes a lot of time
@cookingstreet9362
@cookingstreet9362 Жыл бұрын
@@Aitelly you can take your time waiting for your next interesting video
@aayanscreativelab1786
@aayanscreativelab1786 5 ай бұрын
Imagine being in active warfare as you hop in an abandoned jet and instantly open one of their videos
@shoaib568
@shoaib568 Жыл бұрын
F 16 was built to compliment F 15 not to replace F 14 which is a navy operated platform US Navy does not have F 16s in its inventory
@netsimam
@netsimam Жыл бұрын
F-16’s was actually planned to be on US carrier but lost to the F/A-18
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Agreeed it was planned but it failed as the Navy and Marine has their own requirement
@shoaib568
@shoaib568 Жыл бұрын
@@netsimam YF 16 and YF 17 originally designed for USAF Although YF17 lost the lightweight fighter aircraft competition to the F-16 Fighting Falcon, the YF-17 was selected for the new Naval Fighter Attack Experimental (VFAX) program. In enlarged form, the F/A-18 Hornet was adopted by the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@dennislowe
@dennislowe Жыл бұрын
F-16 did not replace the F-14.
@yellowbacon69
@yellowbacon69 8 ай бұрын
Thank you
@RishiTej-ws2ff
@RishiTej-ws2ff 5 ай бұрын
It didn't but it was meant to
@BEENONEWS
@BEENONEWS Жыл бұрын
Lancet-3 video ❤❤❤❤
@ВладиславБугрим-т6ч
@ВладиславБугрим-т6ч Жыл бұрын
Can I please have a video on how artillery works? Because I just can’t understand how artillery is guided by a drone.
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
good idea
@MrChickennugget360
@MrChickennugget360 7 ай бұрын
a drone is launched the drone's feed is watched by the Fire Direction center who then radio to the guns the adjustments.
@ramchandramaurya6622
@ramchandramaurya6622 Жыл бұрын
It's the best channel ...so deep , such inside detail ...never ever seen ...most in the animated form ....thanks a lot ...
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much 😀Worked 18 hrs a day to get this done.
@ramchandramaurya6622
@ramchandramaurya6622 Жыл бұрын
@@Aitelly Really ...it's see in the whole content. ...here are many channels ...making hours video .... But actually content rabish ....thanks a lot again ...
@chaitanyakulkarni6416
@chaitanyakulkarni6416 Жыл бұрын
would love a video comparing which AD can take down which all planes , comparing them agaisnt there own planes and others nation planes
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the Idea
@muhammadusmanrafique3517
@muhammadusmanrafique3517 Жыл бұрын
thanks for the tutorial guys
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
😂 always welcome.
@DeezzzzzzNuts12
@DeezzzzzzNuts12 7 ай бұрын
Your mother loves pork chops and bacon and cheese
@touchingdude9385
@touchingdude9385 Жыл бұрын
I just hijacked a plane. Currently watching this in the cockpit. Thanks!
@Jive-Gaming
@Jive-Gaming Жыл бұрын
Can we see a video on ramjet next time ??
@jontrout2010
@jontrout2010 Жыл бұрын
ah yes "View Reset (Track IR)" the most underrated viper feature
@haraldkonig8317
@haraldkonig8317 Жыл бұрын
the IFF antenna is the "birdslicer"-antenna in front of the cockpit, not on the rear upside of the fuselage.
@AlmerRaaph
@AlmerRaaph Жыл бұрын
Request Tank harimau indonesia please....
@ilyosbek_ibrohimov
@ilyosbek_ibrohimov Жыл бұрын
Excellent🎉 . Please prepare for t-14 armata tank
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Noted
@ilyosbek_ibrohimov
@ilyosbek_ibrohimov Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@CA-jz9bm
@CA-jz9bm Жыл бұрын
Its just a parade tank for now
@ilyosbek_ibrohimov
@ilyosbek_ibrohimov Жыл бұрын
@@CA-jz9bm on the one hand,its true
@mateusz_0
@mateusz_0 Жыл бұрын
1:02 Small mistake most produced military aircraft is bf109 in world war 2
@JJawsyW
@JJawsyW Жыл бұрын
The F18 hornet replaced the F14 tomcat not the F16. The F16 wasn't even considered for the navy so basically the F16 more likely replaced the F4 phantom.
@masaukochitsamba7808
@masaukochitsamba7808 Жыл бұрын
There is one inaccuracy in your video. The F 16 was not produced to replace the F 14, it was produced to compliment the F15. The F15 was seen as high level fighter and the air force needed a light weight fighter to compliment it. The F14 was a navy fighter while the F15 and F16 are air force fighters. The light weight fighter for the navy was the F/A 18 and its variant, the Super Hornet would later on replace the F 14 in 2006.
@alichahin
@alichahin 7 ай бұрын
Also the smaller size of the F-16 isn't the reason it can be vulnerable to SAM systems. It is quite the opposite.
@Xmw92ba3oenalfk9
@Xmw92ba3oenalfk9 Жыл бұрын
F-16 has been my favorite fighter for a while! Thank you for making this video!
@rafaelsomething5880
@rafaelsomething5880 Жыл бұрын
Great video as always. Hopefuly next would be the Jas 39 Grippen.
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
We shall see. Research takes a lot of our time.
@SaiTaX_the_Chile_boi
@SaiTaX_the_Chile_boi Жыл бұрын
I want to mention that “fly by wire” means the stick does not directly control the craft, the stick gives instructions to the aircraft’s computer and the computer figures out the best way to accomplish the orders, this aircraft is also an intentionally unstable aircraft, so the computer has to constantly fix the course, the exchange for this is better maneuvering. This is also why the F-16 has perfectly straight wings on the middle of the fuselage, instead of on top or angled on the bottom as other fighters.
@marsmarshall2486
@marsmarshall2486 Жыл бұрын
*AAA Video TOPGUN thx AiTelly Team*
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks ! You might also like Nuclear Powered Submarine Engineering behind it #3d Nuclear Reactor released Link: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gGHPk2dsj85oY9U
@igg3937
@igg3937 Жыл бұрын
Not the meanest-looking, but definitely the sexiest fighter jet ever produced.
@shouri-j
@shouri-j Жыл бұрын
Awesome.I was waiting for the whole week 😁
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
More to come!
@Gig_Pop
@Gig_Pop 5 ай бұрын
Thanks for the tutorial on how to use the F16! *proceeds to join the air force*
@Bricknut34
@Bricknut34 Жыл бұрын
Which fighter jet would win? Mig 29 or F 16 ?
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
I don't know but will just have to wait and see
@DreamRust
@DreamRust Жыл бұрын
F16
@shalitharukmal8268
@shalitharukmal8268 Жыл бұрын
Mig 29
@thetopsecretpentagonsclass6350
@thetopsecretpentagonsclass6350 Жыл бұрын
F-16 (100%) MiG-29 don't have any chance of survival against even block 40 F-16s!.
@БаатрВанькаев-з7д
@БаатрВанькаев-з7д Жыл бұрын
зависит от лётчика
@suphx
@suphx Жыл бұрын
“Man-over-ability” - maneuverability. Sorry brother that just made me smile. Reminded me of how I remembered how to spell beautiful. “Bee-Ah-Yoot-iful”. I love the amount of detail and precision you put into your content. BRAVO!!! Keep on Keeping on. You’ve earned a sub.
@bobbymak6964
@bobbymak6964 Жыл бұрын
You mentioned that the F-16 was to replace the F-14. This is untrue. The Air Force wanted a cheaper fighter to the F-15 and a competition developed between General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman developed. Otherwise, I enjoyed the video.
@pokkyro
@pokkyro Жыл бұрын
7:23 Those labels are from some player who set it up that way in the game. Especially the "View reset track IR" button.
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
i think we made a very Basic explanation It's impossible to teach everything in 13 minutes
@pokkyro
@pokkyro Жыл бұрын
@@Aitelly I understand. I didn't mean it in a bad way, I really like your videos.
@visoroverwatch3247
@visoroverwatch3247 Жыл бұрын
Man can't wait to get my very own F16.
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
You mmight if PEPSI offers you www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/16/pepsi-wheres-my-jet-netflix-documentary-student-who-sued-pepsi-for-jump-jet
@xModerax
@xModerax Жыл бұрын
This is so nice. You guys always manage to timely put out good videos on the current tech thats in the discussion.
@kaumeblok
@kaumeblok Жыл бұрын
M4 Sherman tank please
@DonetskBall
@DonetskBall 3 ай бұрын
After we received first two objects I decided it's time for me create my own model for this one. Thank you so much for that video, it helped me a lot!
@LOLONO666
@LOLONO666 5 ай бұрын
This fighter jet has been my fav since i am 16👌
@ell8711
@ell8711 5 ай бұрын
i believe the MiG-21 was actually the most widely produced military aircraft overall, with the F-4 being the largest produced American aircraft for export. The F-16 is designed to replace both of these fighter jets for foreign countries
@pork_friedrice
@pork_friedrice 7 ай бұрын
One minor comment, the fact that the F-16 is “small” is a pro not a con when it comes to radar detection
@tomdarco2223
@tomdarco2223 Жыл бұрын
Right On Go Army!
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
🙏
@MrKIMBO345
@MrKIMBO345 Жыл бұрын
The F-4 multiple role fighter was replaced by F-16 for the performance in the Vietnam war.
@GMM30
@GMM30 Жыл бұрын
Your videos are top notch. Absolutely gorgeous
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Wow, thank you!
@appsstore11
@appsstore11 Жыл бұрын
This is awesome guys,I loved the challenger tank one and this is soo cool to ❤
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks we tried our best . But KZbin does not like these kind of videos. They love Trending topics.Hope the algorithm changes
@HatredOfMephisto
@HatredOfMephisto Жыл бұрын
I'd like to see you try creating contents like the T-55s T-62 T-64 T-72 T-80 T-14 Armata contents. whichever the peps are more interested in but TBH everything is interesting on this channel.
@hh9qalamri941
@hh9qalamri941 11 ай бұрын
cant believe this is free
@tord2443
@tord2443 Жыл бұрын
Damn bro, you need create a game like War thunder, your animation skills are so cool! Think about that idea
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
That's a lot. We are just amateur content creators. Who lost our Job due to C0vid
@tord2443
@tord2443 Жыл бұрын
@@Aitelly Oh damn
@snipes_1138
@snipes_1138 Жыл бұрын
Btw they ripped the models and textures from war thunder. The scratch Marks and wear in the paint on the F-16 are exactly the same it looks to be the F-16A but with the blue on the tail panted over. And the mig-21 looks like it's the Mig-21PFM from war thunder as well.
@tord2443
@tord2443 Жыл бұрын
@@snipes_1138 thx for info
@Rage_Rogers
@Rage_Rogers Жыл бұрын
What if USA had only F-16 mutlirole fighter in its air forces (navy, air force, army, national guard?) Would it be sufficient to ensure all fighting roles? This jet looks awesome.
@fra93ilgrande
@fra93ilgrande 2 ай бұрын
3:55 BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT moment 👹💥
@changewingkid3938
@changewingkid3938 Жыл бұрын
I have a complaint about the sound you used for the M61 Vulcan. That sound is actually the sound if the bullets impacting the ground. The other, higher pitched “whine” is the actual sound it makes.
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info. You might also like Nuclear Powered Submarine Engineering behind it #3d Nuclear Reactor released Link: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gGHPk2dsj85oY9U
@courtingblues3740
@courtingblues3740 Жыл бұрын
A video on the jf 17 would be great
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
You tube doesn't like video which are not Trending
@matheo4934
@matheo4934 Жыл бұрын
you enjoy saying cockpit aren't you. haha just kidding. as usual your video is super amazing. thanks.
@MjJangid-gv3ny
@MjJangid-gv3ny Жыл бұрын
V1 flying bomb
@sujanshetty887
@sujanshetty887 Жыл бұрын
Please make a video on SAAB griphen
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Noted
@EnkhtuvshinNerbii
@EnkhtuvshinNerbii Жыл бұрын
next how work T14 Armata pls
@Manumartttt
@Manumartttt Жыл бұрын
I love this channel!! Thank you from 🇺🇾
@saminsiddiquee2059
@saminsiddiquee2059 Жыл бұрын
It's not the most widely produced military fighter. That goes to the mig 21
@revbladez5773
@revbladez5773 Жыл бұрын
The most widely produced military fighter is the Il-2 Sturmovik. More than twice as much as MiG-21 and F-16 combined.
@DailyNamaa
@DailyNamaa Ай бұрын
Man ! Your team is awesome
@kaamoshaamu
@kaamoshaamu Жыл бұрын
Video quality is great. Commentator needs to get better mike (I mean it's currently fine, but to get to the level). It's boomy, packed and feels that somebody is next to your ear.
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Your feedbacks are appreciated. learning as we move ahead producing content.
@irfanKhan-iw4tu
@irfanKhan-iw4tu Жыл бұрын
Plz make a full video of f14 Tom Cat, my favorite fighter jet ever made in history. I loved 😍 watching the 3d video on my favorite f14 jet
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
We blame KZbin Algorithm. For some Reason they like only Trending Video/News 😔😭
@irfanKhan-iw4tu
@irfanKhan-iw4tu Жыл бұрын
@Aitelly so it's h about History video and for knowledge improvements for students they can learn from this videos directly they will understand easily ok try you're best make a video on f14 Tom cat
@caiquealencar1688
@caiquealencar1688 Жыл бұрын
This is a really great channel, congratulations and greetings from Brazil.
@Holyinductor
@Holyinductor Жыл бұрын
The part that showed the process of taking of was great to get a sense what its like
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
It's all a basic process. But I gut it takes 6 months to just get the feel of it
@phungquyen3511
@phungquyen3511 20 күн бұрын
0:59 One thumb down for saying the F-16 was "the most heavily produced military aircraft ever" with only 4,500 built. In World War II, the Soviets produced 36,000 Ilyushin 2 ground attack aircraft. F-16 is not even the most heavily produced jet, as over 10,000 Mig19 and Mig21 were made.
@Iris47-k3s
@Iris47-k3s Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for your videos, very well explained and very informative. You deserve much more attention and support
@therexbellator
@therexbellator Жыл бұрын
Great video. The F-16 is my favorite modern fighter. It's beautiful, sleek, and deadly. 🐍
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
Thanks 🙏👍
@kamyabbahrami9931
@kamyabbahrami9931 Жыл бұрын
You forgot the INS INS to NAV Battery switch to on Parking breaks off Turn on nozzle steering
@kamyabbahrami9931
@kamyabbahrami9931 Жыл бұрын
And etc
@Aitelly
@Aitelly Жыл бұрын
😀
@GuyFromSC
@GuyFromSC Жыл бұрын
The chain link fence around the Air Base doesn’t look as tall anymore. 😂
@chandrachurniyogi8394
@chandrachurniyogi8394 Жыл бұрын
the F-16C Fighting Falcon (Block 50+ Advanced) multi role air dominance fighter was not the replacement of the naval carrier borne F-14C Tomcat multi role fighter interceptor . . . not even close because both were designed to serve very different purposes . . . the F-16 was conceived to supplement the F-15E Strike Eagle (Block 30) multi role interdictor strike fighter, as a cheap alternative to the expensive F-15 . . . the carrier borne F-14C Tomcat multi role fighter interceptor was to be replaced by another dedicated carrier borne fighter interceptor, that we know now as the F/A-18 Hornet . . .
@cool_cat007smoove3
@cool_cat007smoove3 10 ай бұрын
Why didn't use DCS World to create this video? 😮😮
@Aitelly
@Aitelly 10 ай бұрын
You cannot show the interior of the jet in DCD. And there's no png Alpha mode for VFX
@masabatsaleem9480
@masabatsaleem9480 4 ай бұрын
F 16 was conceived and built to replace heavy F 4 Phantoms owing to the lessons learnt in Nam dogfights. F 18 was built to replace F 14. Sad really because in my opinion Tomcat was the most streamlined and marvel of an aircraft over past decades. Had everything to stay in business.
@MM-qp8AA
@MM-qp8AA 4 ай бұрын
The F-16 replaced the F-5, and the F-15 replaced the F-4.
@jamesmcd71
@jamesmcd71 9 ай бұрын
The F16 has no flaws.
@userDFboeing
@userDFboeing Жыл бұрын
thanks dcs for making this video lol, btw exhaust is fully open when in afterburner, otherwise it would overheat the nozzle
Is the F-35 Finally Living Up to Its Promise?
11:01
PilotPhotog
Рет қаралды 143 М.
F-35 B Fighter Secret Stealth Technology
12:02
AiTelly
Рет қаралды 121 М.
Quilt Challenge, No Skills, Just Luck#Funnyfamily #Partygames #Funny
00:32
Family Games Media
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
Увеличили моцареллу для @Lorenzo.bagnati
00:48
Кушать Хочу
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
SU-57: GAME CHANGER?
32:43
ATE CHUET
Рет қаралды 276 М.
The F-16 Fighting Falcon: America’s ULTIMATE Multirole Fighter
22:00
How Heat Seeking Missile Works I Aim 9 Sidewinder
8:24
AiTelly
Рет қаралды 591 М.
Inside The World's Most Advanced Fighter Jet | F-35
29:02
Supercar Blondie
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the F-16
40:53
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 4,3 МЛН
How Russia built a stealth jet to beat the west - Su-57
21:53
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 954 М.
The SU-57 Felon - Russia's Answer to the F-22
17:36
C.W. Lemoine
Рет қаралды 2,8 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the F-35B
25:04
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Why The F-15 Terrified The Soviets
14:21
Mustard
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Quilt Challenge, No Skills, Just Luck#Funnyfamily #Partygames #Funny
00:32
Family Games Media
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН