What is the proof .ram temple is a hindu temple or buddist temple ..the historical evidence points it to the buddist era.
@sujeetpandey26602 күн бұрын
Why did we apply reservation, to get justice committed 5000 years ago, right ? What about those crimes committed 1000 years ago ? Need justice for every crime
@sujeetpandey26602 күн бұрын
All crime happens in the past. If we want to ignore the past, what is the use of law and judiciary
@subramanianramanathan58542 күн бұрын
A good question to Mr. Sumant C Raman.
@manusharma50592 күн бұрын
Lord Shiva Temple in Ajmer should be restored.
@kamalamuthappen86062 күн бұрын
Sanatan board is also required as what waq board
@knowledgehub-dsk2 күн бұрын
People like Raman were jaichand of past
@kamalamuthappen86062 күн бұрын
Cant ignore the past
@sriramvenkatraman2 күн бұрын
Sumanth Raman is a good actor in TV debate and maintains one sided views only to spreads as simple..
@Newbie-su2lb2 сағат бұрын
Inviting Suman C Raman to the show is a mistake
@kamalamuthappen86062 күн бұрын
Waq board also from the past can it be fogo
@tpsankaran6750Күн бұрын
Who is the guy lodged this complaint????? Media is not happy to talk about him.. Why???? 🤔🤔
@dnivaranamaratis2 күн бұрын
Hinduism is not about tolerance. Hinduism is about Dharma. Tolerance is one step out of four tools available to us. Sāma, Dhāna, Bhedha, Daṇḍa. Sāma is tolerance. Sumant C Raman is one of those ignorant practising Hindus. These are Macaulay Hindus- more dangerous to us than obvious inimical forces.
@mattdillon53933 күн бұрын
This Raman guy is Saying is to appeasement
@raghavanvs26542 күн бұрын
I salute you
@AnilSinha-s2hКүн бұрын
Visiting the graves is permissible for the men in Islam, but the Messenger of Allah (saws) invoked the curse of Allah on the women who are frequent visitors to the graves, but there is no harm if a woman occasionally visits the graveyard. It is reported in an authentic narration that the Messenger of Allah (saws) said: “, "May Allah curse the women who are frequent visitors of the graves."
@Nair_2 күн бұрын
Time immemorial begins from about 1200 yrs ago for Islam while the Sindhu Saravasti Civilization has been on since actual "Time Immemorial"
@kamalamuthappen86062 күн бұрын
Can muslims allow to ban waq board
@drstephenhawking50192 күн бұрын
Second ,there r more than 100 buddist temples beneth big hindu temples .more than 5000 buddist temples were demolished 2000 yrs by hindus
@AnilSinha-s2hКүн бұрын
Converted Indian Muslims should be pleased that their (not converted) HIndu (brothers & sisters) are trying to restore the honour of the ancestral forefathers of Indian Muslims (who were forced or enticed to convert) -- as well as Hindus (who resisted conversion). The ancestral forefathers and traditions and above all the religion of the converted Indian Muslims are the same as those of the (not converted) Hindus. So it's win win for everyone: Hindus and others (who were originally Hindus but were forced or enticed to convert. Also, Dargahs are Shirks for those who follow the Holy Qur'an(4:48) piously and closely.
@dhanapalktdhanu79062 күн бұрын
മുഴുവനും തിരിച്ചു പിടിക്കുക തന്നെ വേണം പൂർണ്ണ പരിഹാരം അതു മാത്രം
@kngprasad40002 күн бұрын
even today hindus are completely disintegrated and are in disarray! my heart for my future hindu generation whether they will still remain as HIndus or Islamised! dharmo rakshathi rakshataha
@IntegratedServicesExcellence3 күн бұрын
More than his argument of today one should be worried as he is Author so one should check his raita and chawal in his books
@AnilSinha-s2hКүн бұрын
Dargahs are forbidden -- fall under the Quranic notion of Shirk. Shirk is an Arabic term that refers to the act of associating partners with Allah, which is considered the gravest sin in Islam. It denotes polytheism or idolatry, meaning the worship of anyone or anything besides Allah. Dargahs are examples of Shirk (Quran 4:48).
@MrRaju162 күн бұрын
Shame on you absolute shame on you Dr.Ananth ! Disgraceful
@sumank45652 күн бұрын
All hindu lands grabbed must be returned. Be it one or one lakh.