Bahco Laplander vs. Silky Gomboy Revisited (2 Years Later)

[@dennisleighton2812]

2:31 Both the Gomboy 170 and the L180 are much closer in size to the Laplander. 7:52 Not only are the teeth longer but they are angled towards the rear for the pull stroke. The return (push) stroke is actually intended to clean out the kerf of sawdust, not to do any cutting. That's why one should not apply pressure on the push stroke. If one uses this technique correctly, it's almost impossible to snap the blade. It does require some patience and a slower more deliberate piston type motion. Definitely a new skill to acquire and practise! The fact that your Silky still seems intact means that your technique seems adequate, if not better. Durability: Contrary to what one reads about the Laplander/Silky, the facts indicate that the Silky blade generally lasts 2-3 times as long, doing the same or similar work. However, the type of work being done does play a role. The Silky is intended to be used with green wood (as it is primarily an arborist's tool) whereas the Laplander is more of a dry wood tool. Given that, when used with hard, dry wood, the Silky will perform pretty much like the Laplander. Of course it is possible to swop out the blade for one with smaller teeth more suited to dry wood (on some Silky saws). To be honest, I don't think this debate will ever really be settled, as there is so much personal preference at play here. Ultimately, they are both excellent tools and at the top of the pile!

[@AlaskanFrontier1]

This is a very good point. Thank you for the feedback and facts!

[@ukpiktonraq9811]

Bahco is my go to saw. Especially for cutting Caribou bone when above the circle. The silky doesn't perform well below -20° and below. The blade snaps easily because the blade wasn't designed for extreme cold weather conditions. I enjoy watching this young man's videos. However, I've lived in Northern Alaska all my life. I'm almost 60. Born in Barrow Alaska. Oh, the Bahco does well on Whale bone also.

[@escapetherace1943]

same I suppose, you can sharpen the bahco too

[@AirsDream]

I dunno’ - I’ve used both to -20 and -30 and had no issues with either. Then again, I’m very careful with the tools I have to rely on in tough conditions. The Silky definitely cuts way faster, so I have several in different sizes, some curved blades, some straight, etc. (Straight-blade Bahco or Silky much better for woodworking - making field furniture, trap triggers, etc.) BUT, if I were only gonna’ field-butcher big game, I’d probably prefer the Bahco, just because you can’t always get in a position where a pull-only saw blade will work well. Then again, if you break ‘rm down only at the joints, a knife will do most everything!

[@Stoney_AKA_James]

Yea I agree, Silky saws like the Gomboy is my go-to saw, I especially like the look of the outback series

[@KiltPatrick]

The blades on the Silkies are much more fragile. Ive got a 130, 170, and a 360, and im on my 3rd or 4th blades for each of them. They bend, or the teeth get chipped. My laplander is my go-to abuse saw, and it just works. I dont mind using it to pop chunks out if im cutting notches. The Silky is more versatile with replacement blade TPI's, but they ARE more fragile.

[@SouthFloridaRealEstateGuru]

Agree 100% I was skeptical about silky but my exp mimics yours . Great content, honest review and accurate... much love from swamps of South florida

[@delopez1966]

Outstanding review; please keep them coming. I own both and I must say, I like features from both, however, I will will admit that the silky gomboy does cut better.

[@jelkel25]

The Bahco is tried and tested kit for me and I've made it earn that title so it will be a good long while before I change it. Did like it when everyone and their dog started talking up the Silkies though as the price of the Bahcos dropped. Would be surprised if that happened at present but I actively encourage you to express your findings on the matter as often as youd like!!!!

[@davidneal6920]

I’m pretty sure the Bahco is New Zealand Army Issue. I still have one I carry everywhere in the bush. Fits in my utility pouch easy. Very versitile. Had it for decades. Saws down lots of stuff. I have never owned a Silky but heard lots of good things about them. Thanks for sharing.

[@gingebrien2408]

Excellent review. This what I’ve experienced as well.

[@wamps3370]

Another great review...I have both and concur with your assessment. I prefer the Silky and recommend it to those that know me...

[@davidanderson8407]

I find the bahco a robust saw.The silky is much sharper and effective.Anouther option which cuts well and is cheaper than both (here in the U.K.) Is the theSamurai Inazuma.

[@enacworldwide]

Thank you for video ❤

[@AlaskanFrontier1]

You're welcome 😊

[@rikidozan553]

Stihl! 😄

[@USMC6976]

I must be the only person that had a negative experience with a Bahco. The plastic part holding the saw broke after just a few issues. Silky still going strong. Only complaint with the silky is keeping it sharp.

[@ZiGGi03]

Silky poket boy outback has a coating to help with non stick

[@AlaskanFrontier1]

Yes this is true

[@THEBLACKANARCHIST]

Silky blades break to often

[@blaserlongrange7616]

I have them both and will never use a laplander again, it's cut to slow ,a silky and some spare blades is all that you need

[@NAH1907]

Hello fellow Alaskan, which you think would cut bone better though?

[@AlaskanFrontier1]

@Brandon Rivera correct. Not to mention it’s a longer blade so it would be faster

[@davidno1minton997]

Cool

[@samthai818]

From my experience: SILKY > CORONA > BAHCO