The Future of Thunderbird - Modernizing an Ancient Application

[@thunderbirdproject]

Thanks for such a clear and educational journey through Thunderbird's history, and for explaining why eliminating all that technical debt is so important! Great video, Alex.

[@nudelsuppe3dsemmelknodel990]

Thank you for serving us all reliably for such a long time!

[@minty_Joe]

Keep up the great work! I've been using Thunderbird since the first release and it just works! After watching this, two things are always going to be consistent for me as a user: 1.) I don't mind the long time between updates. I'd prefer a product that works perfectly verses premature releases that have issues. 2.) I guess call me old school, but I like the interface as-is. I'm so used to it that it doesn't bother me at all. I'd rather stick to TB than use any of the other alternatives out there. Find me another currently supported email app that runs on Windows, Mac and Linux, plus can easily move your user profile between OS platforms!

[@thunderbirdproject]

@@edssn You're amazing, too 💙

[@thunderbirdproject]

@@nudelsuppe3dsemmelknodel990 thank you for using Thunderbird, we appreciate this comment!

[@L.Scott_Music]

I appreciate Thunderbird and am grateful that it will continue to thrive. I need my email to be simple and so far TB has facilitated that. (although I've let it get too cluttered. That's my fault.) People might complain about the interface of TB but what is worse that the on-line interfaces by most e-mail providers? I still have Earthlink and that interface is just no freakin' way.

[@tordjarv3802]

I have used Thunderbird as my main email client for over a decade, but have tried out many competitors. In my experience most modern email clients seem to prioritize form over function which has made them almost useless, but not Thunderbird. With all the tools for automation, such as various filtering functions, Thunderbird has made checking emails much more pleasant. I agree that Thunderbirds interface can be very inconsistent and looks dated, and should be updated but that must not mean that Thunderbird will loose its level of functionality.

[@neoqueto]

@fergusmorris5288 open source projects don't have the same incentive as commercial software companies to sunset features because the analytics show only 10% of people use them. An interface is merely the means of accessing features. But it can make it easier or harder to access them, and that's why it's so important to not fuck it up, and that's why change is necessary.

[@noone9929]

@fergusmorris5288 Why Evolution?

[@norbertrandom4843]

6:41 Having witnessed how in Firefox Mozilla has padded almost every element with (I'd claim unnecessary) whitespace and deprecated and hidden the Dense-option, please do not strip the option to have a tight and compact UI from users. Yes, there's nothing wrong with making that option opt-in but please do not remove it.

[@dansummers2965]

Agreed. For me, Firefox's UI is _too_ tight and the first thing I do when I install it is to switch to one of the slightly more spaced-out modes ... but I like that I have that option. Configurability and customisability is key.

[@FreihEitner]

Hear hear! Looking like a big touch-friendly tablet app is fine if you're a big touch-friendly tablet app, but the option should be there for desktop users to continue efficiently using their screen real estate and mouse-friendly smaller features.

[@haukenot3345]

@@FreihEitner I agree. I can't work with most Microsoft products because the options I am looking for are usually hidden to the point that I just don't find them to make the UI look as "clean" as possible.

[@HappyBeezerStudios]

Even better, until Windows 8 we had the option to set the padding and font sizes for different UI elements independently how we wished. With WIndows 10 that option got removed and we have to use the UI how they want it (unless we use 3rd party tools to change the corresponding registry keys directly) So there was a time when the user could change the UI if they wanted to, but that option got removed.

[@thesenamesaretaken]

Meanwhile, for some reason, scrollbars in many applications have become so thin it's hard to use them (or, my personal favourite, when in fullscreen the rightmost pixel on the screen does not count as the scrollbar, so you have to play pixel hunt in order to click on it)

[@TitouFromMars]

A good example of how redesigning an interface can boost an open source software is Blender. The redesign that occurred with version 2.8 made Blender's popularity surge. At the time some people complained about the new interface, but today I think everyone agrees that it was the right thing to do. (of course there were other new features like Eevee)

[@DeeezNuts]

I did use Blender back in late 2019 after that change, and it just was Perfect. Every time you open a tutorial and see that old grey-scale color i get sick. I also tried 3D Max and that also gave me sickness, although i haven't touched Blender in over 2.5 years and moved to coding i still remember how to use it and what to do because it so f***ing clean.

[@gurok2]

A contrary example would be Firefox, which bled users with Aurora and other redesigns that it never got back.

[@TitouFromMars]

@@gurok2 yes, a redesign in itself can't do everything. There is also the influence of the market in which Blender evolves: its direct competitors are expensive applications. So there is a real demand for an open source alternative. More complicated for Firefox or Thunderbird whose competitors are either free (webmail, gmail first, which is good enough for many users) or almost free (like outlook which is included in the office pack). In addition, it 's a market in decline, because outside the business world, it's the phone that is mostly used to read emails.

[@ExtremeMetal]

Gimp will always impress me, I remember trying it a few years ago and just giving up as I hated the UI so much, now it's so good I haven't even though about photoshop

[@HappyBeezerStudios]

@@ExtremeMetal I'm still having trouble with the UI and how things work differently. Not sure what their target audience is, but it can't be people switching over from Photoshop. Just recently I had to jump through hoops to delete multiple layers, because GIMP doesn't have the ability to delete more than one at once.

[@Knards]

I have used Thunderbird for years, and frankly never thought it looked old. I use the mail and Calendar and rely on them. I have outlook on my computer, but have never set it up

[@SpencerCourtis]

...good - if it works well and efficient, don't fix it.

[@talbech]

Been using TB since release and appreciate that the design isn't changing constantly. I have brought many happy new users on board. I don't need a fancy looking mail client.. I just need one that works and works well.

[@AndrewVelonis]

I've been using Thunderbird for years. All I want to do I'd to send and receive e-mails. I don't give a damn that somebody thinks it looks dated. And it is NOT clunky.

[@uzer_zero]

35+ year software engineering grunt here - I feel your pain, trust me, it's one of the reasons I retired from the industry early. I've often wondered about some of these T-Bird details, so thanks for discussing them. To be honest, as haphazard as its development effort sounds, someone has clearly been keeping a pretty good handle on it, as I've always found it usable and, in fact, preferable to any alternatives I've come across - and I still have mail in my Sent folder from 2003. Then again, I maintain my own mail server and like to have as much control over my client(s) as possible, so - for me - that's a big plus with T-Bird. As you update the product "re-imagined for a modern audience", my hope as that it remains primarily a robust, straightforward email client, uncluttered by the sort of things that make Outlook, for example, unusable (for me). Feature and scope creep have killed projects too numerous to count even in my own experience. Each time I've seen a new non-email feature added to this application, I've shuddered (Chat? there are already a million chat apps out there). My preference would be to see things like that implemented as optional extensions, FWIW. Also, please do not forget that so many people ARE NOT using this application on a phone; it has to remain viable on a desktop / laptop. A dumbed-down, tile-driven U/I squeezed into the lowest common denominator for an iPhone screen will send me looking for alternatives. /rant ;0) Good luck, Alessandro. Truly.

[@fenix849]

With modern UI/UX techniques there should be no reason the interface can't be as detailed as it should be on desktop and provide just enough detail on a phone. But getting there is a lot of work from the ground up.

[@uzer_zero]

@@fenix849 Yep. Absolutely. And it's the 'lot of work' bit that prompts middle-manager-wannabe-bureaucrat-types to call impromptu design "summits" that end up skewing the product toward some imagined "80/20" paradigm that leaves one or more platforms sucking wind. Been there, seen it IRL way too many times. I pray Mozilla & T-Bird are free of this malady, but SW engineering doesn't vary all that much from one project (or company "culture") to another; someone's career is usually on the line. Take it slow. T-Bird is a wonderful, completely viable application RIGHT NOW. It is not in dire need of constant "improvement" or feature expansion.

[@someperson8670]

@@fenix849 tbh I really like the interface of thunderbird atm. I feel like the current one is kind of a little bit function over form but I prefer that to form over function that seems to be the trend everywhere😅

[@PhilStracchino]

Oh dear gods yes. One of the biggest interface mistakes it is possible to make in a modern-day application is to mandate that it have exactly the same interface on mobile devices and desktop. That means one of two things: It will be either unusable on a mobile device, or crippled on the desktop. It's like stipulating that the user interface for your bicycle and your fifth-wheel half-ton 4WD pickup should be the same. It displays a basic incomprehension of the fact that they are different operating environments for different applications. Surely we don't **ALL** have to repeat the mistakes of Windows 8.

[@pauldwalker]

The greatest Thunderbird feature for me is the complete control you have over setting your mail settings. More and more clients are "simplifying" the process and hiding the gory details of mail client setup - which is wonderful when it works, but makes it difficult to impossible to use these clients if you have an unusual setup. Thunderbird is the one program that I can connect to any normal mail server.

[@PhilStracchino]

This is one of the greatest and most common errors of graphical applications: Making the common, simple operations as easy and accessible as possible, at the cost of making uncommon operations obscure, extremely difficult, or even impossible, "because who would want to do that?" I just set up a new dedicated VR box for my family, running Windows 10 x64; the process was two days of near-screaming frustration as I beat the cursed thing into usable shape, trying to remember all of the things I had to do last time around, "last time" being three or four years ago, and where to find all the little hidden tweaks to make it behave as I expect it to. It took two hours **just** to figure out how to persuade a **CURRENT** Windows 10 build that my RFC1918 home LAN is a trusted private network. I ended up having to do it using PowerShell, because I could not find any way to do it through the GUI controls. (I found lots of *instructions* for doing so. Most of them referred to controls that didn't exist. The rest just didn't work.)

[@pauldwalker]

@@PhilStracchino I hear you, my brother. I know your pain well.

[@nzoomed]

Yes agreed, try telling apple that!

[@billbliss7407]

Because of this video, I've donated to Thunderbird. Thank you for the information and explanations. I really appreciate it!

[@alecaddd]

Oh wow, thank you so much

[@wimpostma]

Thanks for sharing this. People underestimate how much work these kind of shifts are.

[@alecaddd]

Indeed, it takes years just to change a few things without breaking everything else

[@biblebadcopycatofcuneiform8210]

Many people actually don't. The "older" tech generation understood and understands how it all happens. It's 20's and 30-somethings that don't usually get it and require a lot of teaching. Hardware and programs used to be made VERY well and checked a lot before release to the public. That hasn't been true for 15 +/- years. I've noticed a lot of sloppy hardware and programs around. I smile big when I see someone has Passion for what they're doing and doing it well.

[@HerrBlauzahn]

I've been using Thunderbird for a some time now and I just love it. Excellent OpenPGP and S/MIME support. I've also donated a small amount of money to support development. I'm really excited for a more customizable UI, especially if it includes a 3-column layout.

[@mattsadventureswithart5764]

An ancient application? I remember it being brand new and being so excited for such a new modern email client. It may look old, but it works

[@alecaddd]

Yeah, 20 years in software development is a pretty long time, and we have some code that still lingers from the early days.

[@stellarorbit1341]

Agreed. I enjoy how it works currently, but I also wouldn't mind it getting some much needed attention. I am sure things will work itself out.

[@biblebadcopycatofcuneiform8210]

Yep!! I don't see anything "ancient" about it. So what if it's "older".. My Amiga 4000 has been recapped and fixed but it still does what I bought it for, it wasn't only for games. I still use Windows 7 because it's pretty to look at and has a GREAT GUI where Windows 8 and 10......nooooo. I like and use Windows 11 now because I _have_ to, not because it looks good. It looks like shite and the UI is much more complicated than Windows 7. So many people I know don't understand why Micro$oft didn't just make changes to Windows 7, keep the GUI and the comfort of interfacing and modify it that way? The State employees where I live, were attempting to Boycott Windows 8 and 10 because of the horrible UI. I think Mozilla really needs to consider that a lot better than Micro$hit did. I have Start11 installed for Windows 11, and that at least brings back Windows 7 Menu while having the choice to use Windows 11's menu. Some of the older stuff is better than newer. I love progress, but not all progress is actually GOOD. I don't need a new Phone every year. I wish I still has my Android S9 with the MicroSD slot. I think the 30-somethings should be more careful with the use of ancient. At almost 60 I do not consider myself old at all. I'm very aware of Tech, how to use it, and help kids. Yet, I'm in the range where some call me "old"..and it usually requires me to THINK about Being old to recognize they're meaning I am, without knowing me. But then, a lot of 30-somethings aren't around animals much, nature much, or...Really interacting with people much. That can create a very screwed view of things. If they make Thunderbird so that we can change the look BACK to the original and 'pretty' again, then okay, as long as it's not really complicated as Windows 8/11 have become. The Amiga developers had a philosophy: "A computer for the users, from basic usage to very complex. Depending on your needs and everyone is considered. You don't have to be a Rocket Scientist to use it - but if that's what you want, it's there."

[@topcivilian]

@@alecaddd rewrite legacy code in Rust?

[@sunrae3971]

I am using Thunderbird since the stone age as long as it the Application is safe and reliable i am happy. Design wise i am more on a minimalist side. A good balance between modern design elements while not turning into a resource hungry bloat monster. Thanks for you Work Thunderbird Community!

[@alecaddd]

You're very welcome

[@knightwish1623]

I brought my first PC 1995 and from day 1 I've used Mozilla software, first with Netscape Navigator/Netscape Communicator and then on to Firefox and Thunderbird. In the 28 years that I've used it I have had no regets. Keep up the good work.

[@jbaidley]

Thunderbird doesn't feel old, it feels like a good email client - unlike most email clients these days.

[@alecaddd]

I'm happy you think that. All the "new" things we're doing will not replace the "old", with the goal to allow current users to maintain the way it looks and behave if they're happy with it.

[@timward2001]

@@alecaddd Last time I looked around for a replacement email client (whatever I was using before having broken and lost my messages just too many times) Thunderbird seemed to be the only choice ... given that I wanted a Usenet client as well. Which is, now, becoming less of a requirement as there's almost no traffic left that I'm interested in.

[@Commiehunter12]

yep. SOy loosers who love communism thinks it looks old

[@forestpagan4813]

Thunderbird and I have been friends for over 20yrs. It has proven to be a rock solid application and very easy to use. I have used it on many windows platforms long before I switched to Linux (first Ubuntu, then mint).

[@GeezerGramps]

I have been using Thunderbird for as long as I can remember. I like how all my email accounts are treated as individual accounts & keeps them separate but also let’s me move a message to another account. Most of the current email clients use the 1 inbox for all, frankly I hate that. I’ve ran Thunderbird on Windows, Linux & macOS the interface looks the same across all & works the same on all, I like that. I appreciate all the work that has gone into all the Thunderbird threw the years. Glad it is being activity being worked on I just hope that in all the modernization that’s going on the way it works doesn’t get broke, at least for me. You’ve got a big task ahead of you & I wish you well.

[@Foersom_]

7:07 "Windows 95 was the pinnacle" it was not, but Windows 2000 pretty much was. Colors used for signal value not for fashion. Flat monochrome pictograms is not an improvement of icons. Please keep Thunderbird navigable by keyboard, it makes Thunderbird fast to use for experienced users. Please keep menu bar available. It makes it easy to explain by text or by voice what you have to select to get a certain function. E.g. to reopen tabs after an app restart: Main menu > History > "Restore Previous Session".

[@xard64]

I just can't overstate how important Thunderbird has been to this point for me and will be for the foreseeable future. It's the only viable independent email / calendar / contant management application which just works and allows seamless switching between Mac, Linux and Windows while being able to easily transfer the settings. The task of easily managing multiple email boxes is so important that it cannot be migrated under any single webmail provider where there is even a sligth risk of the account being shut down beyond reasons out of users control.

[@kumoyuki]

gmail

[@alecaddd]

lol, nope

[@JohnHughesChampigny]

@@kumoyuki Why should I give all my email to an advertising/data mining company?

[@kumoyuki]

@@JohnHughesChampigny Yes, I used to follow that religion, too. Suffice it to say, that I think that I get sufficient value out of gmail in my use cases to be worth the exchange.

[@federicobersano]

For what it's worth, I love Thunderbird precisely because it looks and feels like a traditional email client. I couldn't care less for the calendar and other features, I hate having emails grouped in 'conversations' as gmail does. The email client part of Thunderbird is just what I need, all the additional features added between 2012 and today are a distraction I try to ignore.

[@DevilTravels]

Thunderbird has added email grouping similar to Outlook. That might be a good feature for those that need to thread their conversations, but I found it inconvenient. I managed to find a way to disable that feature.

[@lint2023]

The emails grouped as conversations is terrible. I wish I could switch it back.

[@CoLD.SToRAGE]

I was horrified to see threads. I use my e-mail as a to-don list, threads destroys this look. I turned them off immediately. That said, I’m forever grateful to all the developers that keep this great product going. ❤

[@Wol747]

@@DevilTravelsHow do you get rid of it, please - I hate it when a series of emails gets grouped into a thread.

[@DevilTravels]

@@Wol747 I haven't found a way to break up conversation threads. I think it's now hardwired into the program.

[@JeffRyman69]

Thank you for your explanation. Long ago I used Eudora on a PC and Pine on Unix systems. Both used the .mbox format which lets me look at old (even ancient) non-HTML mail in any text editor if need be. In my next-to-last job, we used Lotus Notes - enough said. Before I retired from my last job I was using Outlook at work, which (obviously) has a proprietary email format. The only way to archive email was to use Adobe Acrobat, which worked surprisingly well, to create files full of email folders and attachments that were accessible with Adobe Reader. But in general, I do not want to use a proprietary format to store my email files. I chose Thunderbird because of its use of the .mbox format and will likely stay with it as long as that format is not abandoned. I have been programming (for engineering software) off and on since 1966 so I appreciate the complexity of what you are trying to change. It is unfortunate that you have to try to "keep up with the Joneses" in terms of GUI features in order to retain and gain new users. While I'm sure you developers are not just being trendy when making changes, many users will ask for stuff that is completely unnecessary. I am glad to learn that you have a paid development staff and are seriously planning for future development. Thank you for your work.

[@bjornroesbeke]

Aside from not supporting regexes in the mail filters, i'm quite happy with my Thunderbird mail client. I don't blame TB devs for not implementing it, i blame spammers for requiring such a function.

[@KaosArbitrium]

I'll be honest, a large part of why I switched to Thunderbird is because I liked the look and feel of it. It's a bit dated, sure, but it's very function first and reminded me of the outlook clients I was using in the late 90's-00's, which was my favorite style. I honestly forgot it wasn't the old school "good" outlook for a while when I first used it. Pros and cons to that, obviously, but that pick-up-and-go familiarity is what brought me to the platform after I got fed up with Microsoft Office and it's bullshit years ago.

[@Medan1993]

Using Thunderbird for last 13 years or so. I love its simplicity, minimalism and working with multiple accounts at the same time. I actually don't care that much about chats, calendar or even looks. All I need is to have it opened in the background to know about new emails.

[@krollpeter]

My oldest message I saved in one of the Thunderbird folder is from March 2006. I certainly tried other email applications, but I found nothing that beats the functionality of Thunderbird. I also do not care about the interface looking not modern enough. To me stability and functionality are more important than flashy design. Especially for an email app, continuity is more important than looks.

[@RetroJack]

13:06 "New services coming out to increase the revenue stream" Does this mean we can expect to see some services of Thunderbird to be locked behind paywalls?

[@Acaykath]

I use Thunderbird specifically because of the windows 95 era interface. Used to use thunderbird, but switched to another program, then one day I had a problem connecting to one of my e-mail accounts because the setting I needed wasn't available in their sleek and modern interface. That is why I switched back to firefox to regain a more granular control.

[@alecaddd]

Our goal is to accommodate all users. The interface should adapt to all needs and be familiar to everyone. We don't want to alienate any existing user.

[@biblebadcopycatofcuneiform8210]

@@alecaddd Alienating is going to happen. You can't "make" other people happy. Happiness is a personal choice inside ones self. I want the colors back in the icons. With a lot of programmers going with the way Windows 10 and 11 looks, it looks soooooo bland and flat. At 1:16, that looks sweet! The little things make the big things. When all colors are removed or made flat...you're removing the fun.

[@tarlneustaedter]

@@alecaddd One of the keys; I have decades of experience with the current interface. I support elderly family members with similar long-term experience with the interface. I don't know what "modern interface" will be, you allude to it without ever giving a hint of what that means (and indeed, what I was looking for when watching this video). I fear problems supporting people who have known only the existing interface, and are no longer so flexible as to easily be able to accommodate massive changes. Please preserve a mechanism so those who are used to the current interface to can continue to use what they understand. Regards,

[@SDKSeizO]

@@biblebadcopycatofcuneiform8210 I also like the 95 to XP era look. Menues at the top, main functionality buttons below and then the data viewer. Clean, easy to understand and navigate.

[@AquariusTurtle]

I agree. The Windows 95 era interface is the most efficient. Sure things can be reduced in terms of the depth of menus and such, but everything should stay high density. It's the most efficient layout for actual work. I have around 20 IMAP server connections in Thunderbird and there's simply no better way to see all accounts that is better than the node tree. If anything, I'd like the interface to be compressed even more to fit more on the screen. Lastly, please don't ever use MS Office style "ribbon" interfaces. Those are horribly inefficient and they eat up tons of valuable screen real estate. I prefer Windows 3.11 style icons that are compact and efficient.

[@damian007567]

Looking old is honestly my most favorite feature of thunderbird. But as of now i really like the UI changes from the last versions, so currently i don't have anything to worry about.

[@AquariusTurtle]

It's funny how many of the "new" interfaces don't hold up to real work. They look cool, but they work horribly. Microsoft's office interface comes to mind.

[@samuele5931]

@@AquariusTurtle if interfaces are designed properly there's nothing wrong in the new trends... I don't think that that a lot of older interfaces were better, instead I think we just got so used to that they feel natural now and we can do stuff without thinking much. That's why it is important to change as soon as possible to a properly designed and coherent interface so we can get used to faster and get back to feel the interface as natural again. In other words if the interface is properly designed, the less changes, the better.

[@Yggdrasil42]

@@AquariusTurtle I have to disagree. Though I had initial misgivings about the Office changes (and it's changed many times in the past decade or two) they've worked better when I gave them a chance. I realized it was partly me being stubborn out of nostalgia.

[@AquariusTurtle]

@@Yggdrasil42 The ribbon is made for newbies and casual users. The order of icons and presentation groupings were designed by committee at Microsoft based on a distribution curve. The problem is that most people write 1 page letters. If you do work like write books, do 50 page spreadsheets, run custom VB macro code, do technical writing, etc., the ribbon is the worst possible interface. It's slow by virtue of hiding many of the needed functions and forcing you to hunt. In the older toolbars you could place far more functions on a toolbar, which could be docked anywhere. That's not possible with the ribbon. And the ribbon takes 3/10s of all the vertical space, which is a ton. Again, the ribbon is fine for casual users but not for workers.

[@AquariusTurtle]

@@daicon3 agreed. Windows' new interface, for example, leaves you wondering what has focus, what are window borders, where you are on a page (since the scrollbars are tiny). At least in Windows 95 and 3.11 you could always tell what was what. Scrollbars were always scrollbars. Buttons were always buttons. You weren't screwing around with endless depths of non-hierarchial pages with a GUI that seems to emulate a cellphone.

[@anonimuse6553]

Thunderbird is great. I have used it for 20 years. It has everything I need. I don't need it to look new. The simplicity is my favorite part The best part was when Thunderbird incorporated a dark mode! There is an old saying which I often find useful - If it aint broke, don't fix it.

[@genieur8188]

Thanks for TB. I am of the ones that started with it since the beginning. And it still covers all my needs. I am trusting that you'll bring in fresh ideas coming back from the community. Thanks for all your hard work.

[@annachristina2179]

I've used Thunderbird since the days when it was part of Netscape and I love that some parts of it still do work the same way (hooray for muscle memory!). But since a while, every new version does something to the UI that's absolutely horrible, does not feel "right", is not configurable (ie. canoot be fully disabled) and does not comply to my desktop theme (I'm using Linux with KDE, Breeze theme with a more gray color theme). The last thing was the "Spaces" bar on the left, which does not use the system-wide colors that most parts of TB use just fine. Also the menus don't fit in the system theme, they look Windows-11-like - no other Gtk application does look like this on my system. Some time ago, TB used native Gtk dialogs and widgets that integrated well into the system. That felt "old", but worked fine. The problem seems to be that "using the things that the user has selected on the system" is not "modern". One of the last victims of "modernization", ie. wasting space and cramming everything in the main window, has been the address book. Instead of a seperate window, one contact opens in a part of the main window and the most important part of the whole PC setup is the mouse wheel. It's also impossible to open multiple contacts at once, eg. for copying data between contacts. Hooray for a "modern" design... I'm learning emacs now.

[@a1white]

I used Thunderbird years ago, I honestly didn’t even know it was still going. Thanks for the update, I’d be up for a modernised version. I’m on a Mac and use Outlook for my work email (which has its own bunch of issues) and I’m not a fan of Apple Mail (with it’s weird way of embedding attachments) for my personal email, so generally use web based Gmail instead. I prefer a standalone app though, so It’s good to hear of your plans.

[@alecaddd]

Thanks! It's gonna take us a couple of years, but we really hope to bring some stability and modernity to the app.

[@prgnify]

@@alecaddd All of this really make me question why change the shapes in the middle of the tower instead of re-writing it from 'scratch' (quotes because, you know, still on top of Firefox, and reusing a lot of stuff etc) - from the outside it looks like you're changing a tree a from the leaves down to branches etc., is there a report from the team on some analysis if they (you) should try and fix stuff or re-start in parallel to "basic" upkeep tasks?

[@prgnify]

I'm crawling through some mailing lists, I'll do my best to find, but even though Topic Box and even mail dot mozilla archives are really and easy to use, mailing lists are hard.

[@alecaddd]

Restarting from scratch entirely would require much more time, and we're a small team of 20 people, so we don't have the capacity to build something completely new while in parallel fixing and maintaining the "old" version. Tackling specific sections, and rebuilding those with an incremental approach is more sustainable.

[@maxcohen13]

One of the things I like about TB is that it _does not_ place form over function. Looking "dated" is fine if it means security, privacy, and a smooth function. Windows and Apple get all the attention because they look good, but it comes at a price an intelligent computer user just isn't willing to pay.

[@PhilStracchino]

... For some people's values of "good". I **HATE** Mac Mail with a burning passion. (But to be honest I hate almost everything about the Mac, especially after having been forced by my job to use one for the last several years.)

[@joechamberlain7441]

I've been using Thunderbird daily for ten years. It's such a good workhorse and mercifully mostly free of the dismal interfaces we have to endure on tablets. Don't change for changes sake. Keep up the good work. I've donated too. Thank you

[@PhilStracchino]

This. I ... guess I've been using Thunderbird for 19 years now? But it seems like longer because I have difficulty remembering a time when I didn't use it.

[@pmnt_]

14:10 The big question is: What do the Thunderbird developers see as competition? Outlook? Teams? Messengers? "Personal communication application" can either be a glorified wording for "email client" or a dangerous threat of losing the focus what Thunderbird is about. Please dont ruin it.

[@CatMeowMeow]

Excellent work! Hearing about ui changes in Thunderbird has always scared me, I really like the compact view (especially because I am someone who gets a ton of emails each day) and the 3 column layout. Thunderbird is an application I have open at all times on my second monitor and that calendar in the 3rd column is the single thing that prevents me from totally forgetting about my daily responsibilities. I do hope that in the future that compact email display and 3 column layout will continue to be supported

[@alecaddd]

There's literally no sane reason for us to remove that layout and the current compact UI

[@FreihEitner]

Since you mentioned 3 column layout, I will say that I am very much married to the 2 column layout with reading pane below the list of emails. I do not read my emails in a narrow pane along the side. As with other comments, the option to do either is most appreciated.

[@alecaddd]

@@FreihEitner Which part of my video made you think that we will remove functionalities or prevent users from have the layout the way they want?

[@FreihEitner]

@@alecaddd There was nothing where you specifically stated that, but likewise little detail was given on what to expect from the referenced overhaul of the interface beyond removing "dialogs launched from other dialogs". I'm just nervous about what it might meant to modernize the interface and do away with the 90s aesthetic (which happens to work quite well for my use case).

[@alecaddd]

@@FreihEitner I'll do more videos with an early alpha to show the progress and highlight how we're supporting both types of interface

[@AlexandreMS71]

TB is my everyday companion, I use it for everything email related, it keeps opened 24h a day, everyday and I use it in my job, it is just fast and easy to use. And yes, I use it since the days it was part of Netscape.

[@youp1tralala]

Thunderbird does not feel old by any mean. It feels like a great Desktop program, essential for millions of people. Please do not destroy or ruin it in that modernization effort. There is lot of bad stuff in so called modern user interfaces...

[@alecaddd]

We don't want to alienate existing users, so supporting various layouts and interfaces is one of our many goals

[@RicardoLuna]

This is also my concern. TB is office software, not tiktok. I hope any change they make is about productivity first, eye candy later.

[@nobodyimportant2470]

It does look old but old isn't a bad thing. It is very intuitive and not off putting at all. Don't change the way it looks just to change the way it looks. Focus on function and ease of use and if that includes changing the UI then so be it.

[@alexphillips4663]

@@nobodyimportant2470 You should see my Firefox. Looks like pre-Australis FF, back before FF tried to be Chrome.

[@RicardoLuna]

Si, it's 1 year later. How you guys feel about TB now?

[@rubenpriority725]

Very interesting talk, with great info. Thanks for the insight! Small note on the formatting: it helps to add a brief pause in between each [section] of the talk. This gives the listener a moment to breath before switching topics.

[@alecaddd]

Good point! Thank you for watching

[@davey820051]

Thanks for a very frank overview of TB's history, challenges, and direction. As a boomer who's been a Firefox and Thunderbird user for years, I'm comfortable with the "dated" UI, but I hadn't considered your important point that younger potential new users could be put off by it. Is it still the plan to convert K-9 Mail to the Thunderbird moble email client? K-9 is my alltime favorite mobile email app, and honestly, I would hope that integration with TB doen't change it too much.

[@christopheralexander8763]

Been using Thunderbird since 2003. Keep going! Love what you guys have been doing.

[@richardblair3021]

Thunderbird is my go to e-mail client. I agree with others commenting that the interface is why I stay with it. For me, modernization of look and feel is secondary to functionality. It's the functionality that keeps me using it. It is by far the best tool I have managing and archiving e-mails. The stand out feature is its robust, quick, and accurate search routine. I use Outlook and Gmail, both fail miserably when trying to find a simple email I sent or received. I find this ironic as Microsoft and Google have strong search engine business. I often go back to my home office to find an email I cannot find using Outlook on my work computer.

[@ernestuz]

Happy user since 2006. Thanks to all the team.

[@alecaddd]

Cheers

[@rodfer5406]

Stability in email is waaayyy more important than keeping up with fads.

[@smithastley1616]

All the stability in the world isn't going to benefit me, because I'm not using Thunderbird until it has a UI that makes sense.

[@alexphillips4663]

@@smithastley1616 Just as I will stop using it if it ceases to have one that makes sense.

[@Thebigbean114]

@@smithastley1616 I was like you once, i thought it looked terrible then i found out you can pretty much customize to somewhat look like Gmail. Them i realized that thunderbird is actually better than modern email clients

[@smithastley1616]

@@Thebigbean114 Thanks, had no idea. I'll look into it.

[@justjoe7313]

Thank you, thank you, thank you! And thanks to anybody who is working on Thunderbird! You are heroes! I'm using Thunderbird almost from day 1 and it's still my only email client at home and at work!

[@alecaddd]

Cheers

[@ferrumignis]

I have used Thunderbird for many, many years and honestly can't think of any significant complaints. The user interface might be getting a bit long in the tooth, but it offers everything that the majority of users need.

[@mikebowers7161]

The funny thing is, I understood 20% of your explanation, but I have used and loved Thunderbird for many years. I didn’t realise the difficulties you faced on a daily basis. Sure it’s a bit clunky but it does everything I need from an email provider. Thank you for explaining this to us.

[@alecaddd]

Thank you so much for watching

[@unpronouncable2442]

As someone who works in a corporation that uses Thunderbird I don't see it as old/unwelcoming or whatever. I look at it as business application. I don't care for the confetti throwers and laminar water fountains or whatever the modern "app design" calls for as they simply get in the way. Does it receive mail from IMAP/POP? yes? Cool! Does it send mail? yes? Cool! Can I view my mail? yes? Cool! Do I have to relearn how to use it because some designer wants to flex his arts degree and "refresh" the UI? no? Cool!

[@FreihEitner]

Thunderbird is the best standalone email client, in my opinion. That is why I have used it across multiple OSes for over a decade. Can it become better? I suppose it can. Just remember that change for the sake of change is not progress. As someone who regularly uses multiple email accounts which should be kept separate (work vs. personal), I have rejected otherwise good email programs in the past which tried to force a single unified inbox. Beyond not wanting that, I specifically want to not have that. If thunderbird continues handling multiple accounts as well as it does today (January 2023) then I will be happy.

[@JimKJ3N]

I started using Thunderbird on OS/2 Warp 4. Nearly 20 years later, it's still the only email client I will use on Windows and Linux.

[@luke_fabis]

As clunky and old as Thunderbird might feel, it's still leaps and bounds better than Outlook.

[@alecaddd]

And we will keep making it better!

[@tomcollier1769]

Thanks for this. I'm not a coder; can't write a line of it in any language. I'm just someone who relies on his computer to get tasks done in order to make money. I've always been puzzled by tech reviewers and pundits who gripe about a particular software's "look." I use Ubuntu, (since 6.04 Dapper Duck) and rely almost exclusively on Free Open Source Software (FOSS) to do everything from keep my business' books to edit videos. Thunderbird just works; it works well and does not require that I wrestle with it to get it to do what I want it to do. Frankly, I can't think of any higher compliment for a piece of software. Shame on me for not sending some bucks to support Thunderbird and its developers. I'll correct that.

[@matsuhlen]

Forever time user here... I have been using Thunderbird since 0.1 or maybe 0.2 or whatever, leaving Microsoft Outlook Express, which was great at the time but did leave a bitter taste in my mouth and I was in search of a better alternative. Lovely to hear that my favorite mail application is getting the love and attention it needs. As long as there is mail, I will use Thunderbird.

[@XanatosDavid]

Interface looking dated is not a bad thing ! its a huge plus its why I switched around 2015 to thunderbird from MS outlook, I need my icons to have colors and when you droped usefull icons to switch to useless vector glyphs i almost droped Tb but then i found that Phoenity Icons extension... I need my programs to have a proper title bar an empty title bar, except for title and the 3 windows buttons, i have 6 monitors and enough screen real estate I don't need a UI made for a 10" tablet, but what I need is a UI that's full of optical anchors contrast. Also thank you for keeping the status bar its great to have one.

[@LarixusSnydes]

My main reasons to keep Thunderbird on my (friends') desktops are: 1. Better search options than any e-mail client I know of. 2. Cross-platform compatibility. Whether people I help/ support prefer Linux, Windows or MacOS, I can always secure/ backup personal profiles and port them between OS'es. That said, I hope for a proper port of TB to Android and maybe iOS once the legacy code has been eliminated. One bit of advice however: I love Firefox, but I hate Mozilla's PR department. The reason for that is: Constantly imitating Chrome, dumbing down the UI/UX and pushing pet projects like Pocket and temporary colour theming at odds with the main reasons I chose Firefox: adaptability and respecting privacy. Another thing Mozilla has handled quite poorly is the plug-in developer support especially when switching from XUL to a more modern counterpart. I never use plain Firefox without plugins, except at the time of install, just before adding the plugins. Please try to write extremely good documentation on new API's before abandoning the old and actively listen to plugin developers' concerns before replacing the old.

[@nalle475]

Welcome back! As a longtime user of Thunderbird this is what I’ve been waiting for years.

[@sleibson]

Thunderbird has worked well for me since I adopted it 20 years ago, and it still does. Thank you for keeping this essential program alive, and thanks for the history lesson in how to sustain old software and make it relevant to today's new users the "right" way.

[@Alverant]

I've been using Thunderbird for decades and it's good. I plan on using it in the future because I don't see the need to switch. I don't ask much from an email program so all those extra features aren't needed. Just make it simple and reliable.

[@nzoomed]

Im happy with how thunderbird currently is, has the same feel as outlook express back in the day. I also install it on many peoples computers and most prefer it to the modern Outlook.

[@AStoryWorthSharing]

Years ago, I hacked together a custom CSS file to make Thunderbird prettier and since then, have been thrilled with the appearance and functionality. Thunderbird just works! The only feature I really want is the ability to "PIN" an email message at the TOP, regardless of how the view is sorted. There are emails that are just that important, that I want to be reminded of them "No matter what". Tags and Stars just don't work for me, because I have to remember to use them. If I could PIN a message at the top regardless of how all the other messages are sorted, Thunderbird would be perfect for me -- AS IT IS. That said, I appreciate this amazing video...and I logged in simply to compliment Alex and the Team. This video inspires much confidence and hope for Thunderbird's future. I make an ANNUAL contribution to Thunderbird every year -- and am thrilled to do so. BEST EMAIL CLIENT ever.

[@LeoPlaw]

I was very surprised and pleased with the recent changes to Thunderbird. One example: finally after all these years, the address book appears as a tab and not a separate window. Keep up the great work!

[@DevilTravels]

Yes, the address book is the best target for development. Easy access and comprehensive use of separate categories.

[@s_bergmann]

Doing Open Source development myself for over two decades now, I want to say two things: I feel your pain and, most importantly, thank you for the work that you do. Thunderbird is my third Mail client in over 30 years of using email. My e-mail journey started with YAM on AmigaOS and continues with Netscape Messenger on Windows. No wonder I ended up using Thunderbird 🙂 Keep up the good work!

[@NickHope]

Thank you for your hard work keeping Thunderbird moving forward. I returned to it a few months ago after a few years using Gmail. Besides missing Gmail's superior spam filtering, 3 things that would make me happy are: 1. Integrate similar functionality to the "Thunderbird Conversations" add-on. 2. Ability to make "Show results as list" the default instead of the list of previews. 3. Direct link to open the folder where an attachment has been downloaded (like Firefox).

[@0xzi]

I might be a weird outlier here, but I actually installed thunderbird about a year ago after getting fed up with most of my internet being algorithm driven - I downloaded it to run my own RSS feed to see things I actually want to see. I then started actually using the email client which I now love, and have started using the calendar as my primary calendar on my PC. Very excited for the future.

[@ninefingerdeathgrip]

Thunderbirds logo is one of the most beautiful application logos ever.

[@anthonvanderneut]

1:54 I listened to what was said 5 times before I gave up, only hoping that it would become clear later on, on what Thunderbird was built. Which it did and that was something I already knew as a 20+ year user of Thunderbird and still had not recognised the word Firefox. This is what you typically get when a non-native speaker of Englisch listens to some other non-native speaker of English when they don't share a common native language (that bends their accent and grammar in English in the same way). Please consider supporting key terms in your narrative immediately with a clear on screen display of those terms (i.e. not hidden in some highlighted sentence a few seconds later when someone is already no longer properly listening, wondering what you are talking about). Thanks for the heads up and considering usability for long time users, I hate it when Outlook (that I don't use on a daily basis) has dropped some feature to make it easier on new users, but even worse of an IMAP client than it was in the previous version. Nothing worse than something as crucial as daily email processing being interupted because your previous workflow can no longer be executed.

[@johnfrancis166]

Thanks for this video. I have been using this application since the beginning. I use it daily and do not know what I would do without it. I cannot write code but I will continue to send my donation every year to help sustain this great product. Thank you Thunderbird team.

[@VividNation]

Keep in mind, Thunderbird is right now the must go email application for Blind people. Keep them and screenreaders in mind! For example when Thunderbird starts up its vital to put the focus right away inside the Inbox. Right now the focus if nowhere (start thunderbird, move your curserkeys up and down, what happens?) THAT is where Design comes in place being able to use it blindly.

[@MrJoegotbored]

I have used thunderbird for years now. I'm a bit down financially this year so I can't contribute to its growth right now but I've done so in the past. Thanks for all you do for Thunderbird!! And thanks to your team and the OSS contributors too!!

[@MrKevin1a]

Thank you for being brave enough to insert yourself into the middle of the UI/UX wars like this and acknowledging the voices of users with different needs. While others are using touchscreen devices, I strongly favor compact UIs for mouse and keyboard use. I like having multiple windows open while still fitting a lot of info on the screen. Thankfully, open source projects have often been highly configurable. In my ideal world, the density options would be presented side by side (kind of like light and dark mode) in a startup wizard so future users can experiment and choose what works best for them. I'm not the one writing the code, so all I can say is thank you for every ounce of emphasis you place on UI customization. It's one of the things that makes Thunderbird great!

[@CralexKokiri]

Thank you for the update video. I used to use Thunderbird extensively years ago, but eventually stopped installing it on new machines as I leaned more on my phone and the web to manage email. I am glad to hear that you and your team understand the difference between what is needed, and what is trendy, and look forward to see how Thunderbird continues to develop in the coming years.

[@succubiuseisspin3707]

IMHO Thunderbird should concentrate a little bit more on company users. Management tools that make it easy to roll out and manage TB in a corporate environment (e.g. via GPO) would be great: An out of the box experience where TB configures email, address book, calendar for a new user that opens it for the first time on his/her corporate device or even customizing the UI centrally for all users would also be nice. I think the one of the reasons that Chrome is now installed on nearly every company device is that they had all the management tools for the everyday Admin and Firefox didn’t. And: If you know a program from work you are more likely to install it at home as well.

[@AlexandreMS71]

The thing is ... when the software reaches a level of overall greatness it is hard to find where to go. It is completely matured and perfected.

[@carlop1908]

It always worked, it works now and is always reliable !!! That's THE most important thing. Transitions to another computer were always flawless. I never lost anything. Looks are nice but secondary IMHO.

[@lassesaikkonen501]

The fact that Thunderbird looks so old is the very reason I like it so much. I want some consistency in my apps. I hate it when the apps go with the current fashion trends and break a perfectly good user experience.

[@michadybczak4862]

Awesome and very informative video! I'm using Thunderbird for years. I do recognize its outdated look, but as far functionality goes, it's way ahead any of the free alternatives. Thunderbird can be used in company and has all needed features., especially quick filters and labels. Those alone are making Thunderbird no.1. Global search results are on the hand confusing, but that option is not used every day. Thunderbird has very easy integration and detection of various email providers. I tried the competition, and they cannot even lick the Thunderbird's boots. After witnessing disastrous work of other apps, I was always coming back to reliable and powerful Thunderbird. Sure, there are some small problems, but in overall, there are more positives. I'm happy to hear, that Thunderbird is still being actively developed and modernized. There is simply NO OTHER EMAIL OPEN SOURCE APP that could even reach the potential of Thunderbird.

[@christopherkapic]

Thank you for this video. I don’t use Thunderbird at the moment, but I will definitely give it a chance once some of these updates come through. I’m also making a donation to the project-I say this to say thank you for this video and offer encouragement for the project (and potentially more update videos). Thank you!

[@alecaddd]

Thank you so much for your support!

[@christopherkapic]

@@alecaddd Of course :)

[@Pentium100MHz]

I am using Thunderbird now, but may need to look elsewhere if they modernize the UI enough. Kind-of the same is happening with Firefox. They try to make the UI as close to Chrome as possible. Here's the thing - if I liked the Chrome UI, I would just be using Chrome (or Chromium). There are addons to bring back stuff like the status bar (even if it's completely empty, at least the window has an actual border). I may be among the minority, but I like the UI of Windows 2000 and I think that all the later versions were worse in terms of UI (I hate the game "is it a button or is it just text?"). Hopefully somebody will create addons for Thunderbird to get the semblance of the old UI back, even if it is not complete. If it wasn't needed for security, I could just stop updating and use an old version.

[@christopherkapic]

@@Pentium100MHz I'm sorry, but I think you are in the minority. I agree in the sense that it would be bad if they have ambiguous design, but I think modern UIs are popular because in general, _most_ users find them to be more usable. I think user testing is probably the best way to ensure that users aren't misunderstanding the UI, while still allowing the project to modernize a bit.

[@Pentium100MHz]

@@christopherkapic I remember Microsoft coming out with Windows 8 UI and people hating it. I guess they got used to it over time, since there is no real way to customize Windows UI. Similar to browsers - there is no real way to customize Chrome UI, but for some reason Firefox started to look more and more like Chrome and taking away the ability to customize. There is a bunch of the "modern UI" stuff that I dislike. Every time some program decides to "modernize" I have to think whether I want to update to the newer version.

[@blankslate6393]

As some one whose day to day job depends on Thunderbird for many years, it was the best news of the day when I saw the tab announcing that Thunderbird is going through a renaissance and needs community support. So I did not hesitate to donate to my beloved mail workhorse. Keep up the good job guys. You are Robin Hoods of free software in this corporate jungle.

[@timjohnson979]

I've used Thunderbird since it was split out from what became Firefox. It's an old friend that I trust and enjoy using. Threaded messaging is very useful as well as message filtering. I'm not opposed to UI upgrades to make it look more appealing, but certainly not at the expense of existing function. Another thing I like about Thunderbird is how it can be customized by add-ons. This extensibility is one of the hallmarks of the Mozilla concept. Be very careful not to break it. And yes, I know that is not always possible. Just be sure the result is a better product.

[@AltimaNEO]

I still use Thunderbird as my email client! I hate using email websites like Gmail and whatnot. I prefer dedicated email clients. Having said that, I also hate the Gmail and Outlook clients... Thunderbird is the boss.

[@ArniesTech]

Thunderbird is my daily driver for communication, planning, scheduling and productivity. I am very happy with it 💪😁

[@iclonethefirst]

I'm quite at the beginning of my UX Design carrer and your insights in this projects really help me to improve on it and get a new prespective on things. Please keep us posted!

[@gamingmarcus]

I encountered Thunderbird for the first time last year on my work PC. I immediately fell in love and started using it as my personal client. I don't know how the out of box experience was during the community leadership times a few years ago. All I can say is that in its current state I found the software to be extremely intuitive, versatile and visually pleasing. Although I don't care much about aesthetics in software the 102 update was a great improvement! It doesn't look the least bit old or dated to me. It just doesn't follow the trend of the last ~5 years to make everything as round and minimalistic as possible. Honestly I'm not a fan of that trend because it has developed to a point where form takes priority over function. For example: I don't need pretty looking buttons for software features that I don't understand as a new user when the same feature can be put in a context menu and say what it does with actual words. I absolutely hate having to scan every button of a software for its function.

[@pmnt_]

How Thunderbird looked a couple of years ago? The same. One of the advantages of not having the resources to make changes for the changes sake.

[@cigmorfil4101]

I find it funny that when Sinclair released the ZX81 it was ridiculed for its flat keys, and yet the "modern look" is to no longer to have buttons that look like buttons (like, say the preferred 1982 BBC micro keyboard) but a flat piece of coloured screen (much akin to the ZX81's keyboard). The ZX81 was obviously way ahead of its time...

[@Ultramesh]

I love Thunderbird. I've used it from day one (20 yrs lol), and still use it. It's the best app to aggregate the 20 Gmail accounts that I have. I don't use calendar, or chat or anything else. I just use it for desktop email. and it works great. Please keep it as it is and don't break it :)

[@BadBunny]

I always loved how Thunderbird looked, I love the classic tight styling of it, so please don't turn it into a wasteland of open spaces and huge buttons like a lot of current applications.

[@maurolimaok]

Thanks for the video! I'v ealways used thunderbird, and it's good to know there are people fighting for it.

[@alecaddd]

Nice, thank you so much!

[@SabotsLibres]

Thanks for the explanation. I am a long-term user (pretty much from the start) and despite forays into Apple Mail, Spark, Airmail, Gmail etc. etc. I keep coming back to Thunderbird because, despite its (possibly) clunky looks, it has a functionality still unmatched by all the 'new kids on the block'...

[@TheOfficalAndI]

I love how I was able to transfer my thunderbird profiles over 2 PCs, not needing to tweak anything and having all my data. Also I like how emails actually appear as 'opened' once you click on one. It drives me NUTS that it doesn't work that way in Outlook. Always having to click somewhere else before it changes the status. Looks like you guys are the once with common sense haha. Please pull a Tantacrul, just absolutely killing it with a well thought out overhaul :)

[@NietzscheanMan]

For me it is the automatic marking as read that makes tbird unusable to me. I cannot reply to every mail in fhe moment.

[@alecaddd]

Settings > General > Reading & Display > uncheck the "Automatically mark message as read. Classic example of what I talked in the video, powerful features but with undiscoverable UI

[@JohnHughesChampigny]

@@alecaddd I just click on the little round thing to make it go back green again if I want to procrastinate.

[@samuele5931]

I really would like that you take an older version of thunderbird and highlight the differences with a mockup of what you will like to do and explain why the UX and UI is better and this is not your personal preference. Also highlight what pros and cons would have the new mockup. I think a video like this would really help users to understand why choiches were made that way and understand it is not just that nowadays devs designs for touchscreens.

[@alecaddd]

Yeah, I’m making a series of video about all major UI changes to compare versions and highlight problems and solutions

[@samuele5931]

@@alecaddd an highlight of thunderbird that is understated is that it is both featureful and slow changing. This means that once you overcome the learning barrier, you can enjoy the app for many years to come and you have plenty of time to adapt to changes. I think this is often not appreciated in today professional software. The big example here is EMacs which is terrible terrible UX but still it’s a tool that you can use it for many many years. eMacs to me it is not worth but thunderbird it is.

[@EL34XYZ]

I like how Thunderbird looks. I like simple. I only need email. I don't use any of the other features. If there is a way to only install the email client, I would want that.

[@alecaddd]

We're implementing options to disable parts that are not useful to someone

[@Carlos-cu4ms]

HUGE THUMB UP! Love Thunderbird and hope everything goes well. Thank you!

[@johnthompsonat366]

As a mentor to many senior citizens Thunderbird has been a strong performer because of its constant presentation & operation. Older people have great difficulty with programs that constantly change their presentation & useage. Please dont change too much!

[@thomasgunther]

Even though I' don't use Thunderbird anymore for all the reasons you mentioned I get the feeling that the project is in very good hands. I might come back.

[@deBug67]

This is great News! I am exited to following along when you re-work the GUI in the coming years. Thank you for all your hard work so far and good luck on the journey! 👍😊

[@alecaddd]

You're very welcome, we will do our best!

[@chokfulla]

I've used Thunderbird for over a decade. Thanks for a great application!

[@kyousouka]

I'm looking forward to the UI changes. I'm a desktop user with a standard DPI screen so the current "tight" look has been perfectly fine, but I'm always happy to hear more customisation is coming. That said, I am not at all a fan of the monthly release schedule. if Thunderbird starts bugging me to update as often as Firefox does, I'll probably start looking for a new e-mail client, or turn updates off entirely, which is not a good idea. I hope there will be a "critical security updates" release channel for those of us who prefer to update only when absolutely necessary.

[@richard-davies]

Been using Thunderbird for many years, must be 15+ by now and it's always worked great and the updates to the default theme over time has helped keep the UI looking fresh. I wouldn't say it looks really old and dated, I find the UI nice to look at, efficient to use and everything I need is clearly visible and easy to find. So while I certainly don't mind change I just hope most things don't get buried and hidden away that makes things hard to find in order to make the UI look cleaner.

[@retabera]

Thanks Allessandro! A few thoughts 1/ If Thunderbird is rebuilt, popular extensions/integrations should be built-in to have an official add-in 2/ The Basic UI is part of its charm, don't go overboard with UX 3/Consider an SQL backend (either local or remote, including sharing SQL-backed mailboxes between devices or even users) 4/ If coded as a web app, that would double as being able to have a Thunderbird webmail option

[@alphabitserial]

Great video! Excited to see more updates in the future as this Ship of Theseus reaches its next stages and eagerly awaiting the day Thunderbird release notes make me think "Wow, I've gotta install that!"

[@Sunila_DragonladyCH]

Funny how I was just thinking about this this week. What my expectations are for Thunderbird. I'm one of the "older" users who have been here since the beginning. Back then it was easy to transfer my existing emails. Nowadays I use the portable version of Thunderbird and it means I can save my entire email folder in two clicks. 30 years of emails. I'd hate to loose this if anything too drastic changes. I don't really care about looks, I want a tool that works and no other mail browsers do that.

[@UTJK.]

Thanks for sharing this information Alessandro. I always loved using Thunderbird.

[@alecaddd]

My pleasure!