Alexander Petrov - The Cow (ENGLISH subtitles)

[@joanfordham1305]

Oh,no !this film was so beautiful but it will make you cry unless you have a stone instead of a heart

[@Ripsaiddd]

Bro was absolutely cooking when he made this holy fuck

[@MrCameraderie]

o82774 is wrong people. Andartarius is correct. No rotoscoping or other video or photographic 'tricks' have ever been used by A Petrov, who is regarded by all serious animation lovers and animators as one of the world's great masters of hand-painted cinema. This can easily be verified by doing a bit of research. Please don't be fooled by 082774's malicious comments.

[@ClapsyPlapsy]

Took the words right out of my mouth.

[@scienceandphilo]

best... How much hard animation to make.

[@juanchoresultay2704]

This so damn tragic 😢

[@Niffiwan]

I also subtitled this in 2007. v=r9VCt_EZBu8 You have a few grammar errors here, but I also now see that I didn't hear the words correctly in a few places.

[@joanfordham1305]

Thank you so much

[@JocktanianWolf]

Is there no English-dubbed version of this instead of subtitled?

[@KCandFriendsUSA]

What the hell did I watch?

[@o82774]

@andartarius He uses oil paints for his animation. Acrylics dry way too fast and he needs to use paints that do not dry at all in order for him to alter them for every frame. Petrov is a good filmmaker and painter in the russian national academic style. But he is not an animator anymore than Spielberg is. The camera animates Petrov's films. ALL of his films use a rotoscope technique to create movement. This is a fact. Maybe he can animate. But he doesn't. He directs his actors and copies them.

[@adamwatson2914]

Oh! Yes it looks amazing, but who gives a shit?

[@o82774]

beautiful rotoscope technique with hand painted oil paints. He does lose some points for the obvious tracing (painting) over photographs for EVERY shot. Damn. REAL drawing is truly a lost art

[@brim4452]

whack