⚔️ Alexander the Great vs. Genghis Khan: Who Was the Greatest Conqueror in History?

[@HistoryDropsHD]

Comparing historical figures is complex, especially when the protagonists have so many nuances and you try to compare them in just 15 minutes. Even so, as we mentioned in the video, our goal was to make a fair and equitable comparison. That said, did we miss any categories? Would you have liked us to delve deeper into any particular topic?

[@JohnAngeloBarad]

.

[@ilipap3695]

The leader of the Mongol Empire, from 1206-1227, Genghis Khan, managed to conquer most of China and all the lands around the Caspian Sea. He was one of the greatest military geniuses the world has ever known. The bloodthirsty conqueror associated his name with practices of horror and terror rarely equaled on the planet, becoming synonymous with unspeakable fear. He was ruthless, extremely vindictive and bloodthirsty, destroying numerous cities and murdering thousands of soldiers, civilians and children. He beheaded the poor and tortured the rich to hand over their treasures, while the usual method of killing involved pouring molten metal (usually silver) into the victim's eyes and ears. He raped women in front of their families and ruined the lives of millions of people, while he was the one who initiated the measure of using individuals as human shields. About 20-60 million lost lives are estimated to have been lost because of Genghis Khan. Nevertheless, in Mongolia he is a beloved figure and is regarded as the father of the Mongolian nation. The next time that you want to compare Gengis khan with another leader compared with Hitler , It's the only person which can compare to his madness.Barbarians

[@DexterHaven]

Good idea for a video. How about Caesar vs. Napoleon next?

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@DexterHaven Hello, thank you for your comment. We find the comparison you propose very interesting, and it's something we may consider for future projects. We can also tell you that we're currently working on a new comparative video featuring one of the two figures you mentioned...

[@DexterHaven]

@@HistoryDropsHD Ok, thanks. Let me guess the next project... Caesar vs. Thousand Island dressing...

[@saralas6970]

Both were the greatest military strategist. Of their respective times

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@saralas6970 Absolutely, both conquerors were unparalleled in their time.

[@lychan2366]

Congrats for attempting a balanced and objective analysis and evaluation of the two men. This production stands out from some others that comes across as opinionated. I would add that Gengzhis Khan's legacy include the millions of his living descendants today who can trace their DNA to him, having taken so many wives, concubines and mistresses after conquering vast tracts of land.

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@lychan2366 Hello. Thank you so much for your comment. We really appreciate that you found our analysis objective and balanced. Regarding Genghis Khan's descendants, your point is certainly very interesting; perpetuating and expanding his lineage to such a notable extent is undoubtedly part of his legacy.

[@masterxiong7368]

Differnt leaders in differnt era.

[@Voneclan]

As a Mongolian, I have read a book about Genghis Khan, and in the book, Genghis Khan admired Alexander the Great.

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@Voneclan Hello. It's difficult to determine whether Genghis Khan ever learned of Alexander's existence, and if so, to what extent he was familiar with the Macedonian figure. It's certainly a very interesting topic, because if Genghis did know something about Alexander the Great, it's possible that he used that knowledge for his own conquests.

[@Voneclan]

​@@HistoryDropsHD We Mongols are a people who love to gather and discuss history. It is evident from Genghis Khan's conquests that he had already studied and learned from the tactics and strategies of powerful leaders of the nomadic peoples before him. I am also confident that not only Genghis Khan, but the Mongols of that time were well aware of the histories of great military leaders from both home and abroad.

[@jackmac6304]

One stat I would liked to have seen in here is quality of opponents conquered. A big difference between taking over Greece and the Persian empire or conquering a bunch of nomadic tribes usually vastly outnumbering them and a ton of semi-arid land (the steppe) that was sparcely populated to begin with.

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@jackmac6304 You raise a very interesting point that we could have analyzed further. The nature and quantity of opponents, along with the population density of conquered territories, are indeed intriguing (and complex) factors to consider when comparing Alexander and Genghis Khan. While it's true that Genghis Khan conquered more sparsely populated lands, some of the Persian satrapies that Alexander conquered were also relatively unpopulated. Furthermore, as you know, Genghis Khan faced a variety of enemies (not just nomadic tribes), including the Jin and Western Xia dynasties of China. However, ironically, it was not the Chinese empires that defeated Genghis Khan, but rather other nomadic tribes; before finalizing his unification of the mongol tribes, Genghis was defeated at the Battle of Dalan Baljut by another Mongol leader, Jamukha. This is just to show that, sometimes, nomadic peoples can also pose formidable challenges.

[@ccptube3468]

Dude they are like more than a millenia apart.

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@ccptube3468 Indeed, that's part of what makes comparing them so intriguing (yet difficult).

[@masterxiong7368]

Correct, both elite leaders of their time

[@SwordkingRoyalblood]

Genghis Khan of cause he was not born with a silverspoon

[@GaryFerguson-e6y]

Genghis Khan is the greatest conquer ever

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@GaryFerguson-e6y Hello, indeed, many experts agree with that viewpoint.

[@milapantic5506]

Thank you for being objective. Most white folks would favor Alexander simply because he was a white man. But he was born a prince, a son to a king. He accomplished incredible and remarkable feats. On the other hand, Genghis was left fatherless as a very young child and had a very difficult and challenging childhood without the luxury and easy life Alexander had as a kid. Because of that Genghis had a more harder path to walk on. That's why his accomplishments carry bigger weight than Alexander's. He simply had a harder task to achieve. That's why he is the greatest.

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@milapantic5506 Thank you for your comment. The topic of the impact of one's origins on their success is both fascinating and controversial. There are two main perspectives. Many believe that individuals from more humble backgrounds face greater challenges in achieving their goals due to the disadvantages they start with. However, others argue that overcoming adversity can foster resilience and determination, giving these individuals a competitive edge over those born into privilege (who would not have had to toughen up to overcome those initial difficulties).

[@PhilipDarragh]

U shd compare what GK accomplished in the same amt of time what Alexander accomplished. This would B when Alexander became king, and when GK became leader of his time. That would BA much better comparison.

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@PhilipDarragh Hello. That's an interesting point. In fact, once Genghis Khan had unified the Mongol tribes and consolidated his power (around 1210), his rate of conquest in the following years was not inferior to Alexander's. In approximately 17 years (he died in 1227), he came to dominate about 12 million square kilometers, while Alexander, in a period of about 12 years (from age 20, when his father died, to age 32, when Alexander himself died), came to dominate about 5.2 million square kilometers. In any case, it's clear that we could add endless nuances and comments to this data.

[@AlbertJohn-n9j]

King Khan was powerful man in the 🌎 during a d c Thank 🙏💞💝

[@HistoryDropsHD]

Hello, thank you for the comment. Gengis Khan was definitely the most powerfull man of his time.

[@brucelee270]

If I have to bet, it goes to genghis

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@brucelee270 Hello. Sounds like we're on the same page! 😆

[@brucelee270]

@@HistoryDropsHD No brainer .. I don’t think any one can beat him

[@adamstrange7884]

Alexander didn't have a pax Greekanika!

[@HistoryDropsHD]

Hello, that's an interesting point.😄

[@GeoBBB123]

Pax Hellenika

[@S0ulinth3machin3]

@@GeoBBB123 there was no pax hellenika. The term "pax" means peace. Pax Mongolica means the "Mongolian Peace". As soon as Alexander died, his empire split up as his generals turned it into a giant civil war.

[@GeoBBB123]

@@S0ulinth3machin3 I'm aware of that. I was simply correcting adamstrange's "Greekanika" were it to have been the case

[@MrJamescummings]

A blonde Greek😂 the only one blonde in Grease can you call him and Genghis Khan conquerors that's a polished the word for murder and thief right

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@MrJamescummings Hello. In fact, there have been and still are blond-haired Greeks, although they are obviously not the majority. Regarding Alexander, the various sources vary; for example, Aelian says he was blond, while Pseudo-Callisthenes says he was the color of a lion.

[@MDkhalidPasha]

One more person have conquered around world Islami c khalifa his name is Omar Faruk

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@MDkhalidPasha Hello, undoubtedly, the manner in which Omar Faruk has 'conquered' the world is radically different and more peaceful in comparison with those of Genghis and Alexander. His musical capabilities are truly impressive.

[@enkhzayazundui1063]

Please. The illustration of 😂Chinggis Khaan is wrong. Mongols don’t do top notch. Top notch is Koreans, Japanese and Chinese thing.

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@enkhzayazundui1063 Hello. Thank you for your comment. Yes, you are right about the Genghis Khan illustration. We acknowledge that historical accuracy is important, but we believe that the hairstyle, while a visual element, is not the central theme of our piece.

[@enkhzayazundui1063]

@HistoryDropsHD I understand. Many people are doing inaccurate visuals. Your content wasn't that bad, I have seen the worst.

[@gangamaheshreddy6230]

Only alexsndar not great

[@joshuaa.kennedy8837]

Alexander died to conquer the afterlife. Jesus get me out of here!!!

[@KTA1sVidsandFacts]

Trick question: It was Cyrus the Great.

[@HistoryDropsHD]

Hello, Cyrus the Great was undeniably one of history's most remarkable conquerors. A future video exploring his life and achievements could be interesting, perhaps by comparing him to another legendary ancient conqueror like Sargon of Akkad.

[@Bodlasona]

Persian Kings were one of the greatest ...Alexandar was motivated and driven by the way of the Persian Kings.

[@ardaozdil2839]

Genghis khan. Alexander only conquered Persia and some of Pakistan

[@tatjanavelkova5814]

before 25 centuries ALEXANDER TSAR ON MAKEDONIJA. VERY NICE ! !

[@presbourg]

Ghengis khan is the winneer

[@GeoBBB123]

Alexander's Empire had a greater density of population while a great deal of Genghis's was relatively empty steppes. The cultural impact of hellenization on the history of the world is immeasurable - it influenced and underpinned the culture of Europe and the west as well as the inner east and to some extent India; Genghis cannot compare in the long run. When the duration of their respective reign is considered it is clear that Alexander's impact was far more impressive.

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@GeoBBB123 Hello. Thank you for your interesting response. Regarding the issue of territorial expansion, we agree; there were territories conquered by Genghis Khan that, due to low population density, should have been relatively easy to conquer. However, arguments can always be made to justify the ease of one conquest over another. For example, it could be argued about Alexander the Great that both the equipment and the training of his troops were far superior to those of the Persians. Regarding cultural impact, it's a complex issue with many factors. While Alexander the Great's influence was more pronounced in the West, Genghis Khan's impact on the East was significant. We're not entirely convinced that we can definitively say who had a greater cultural impact.

[@S0ulinth3machin3]

China was not and is not sparsely populated. The Mongol conquests extinguished 10% of the world population to the point where the decline in the number of humans can be seen in the climate record. The razing of large amounts of agricultrual lands led to them returning to their natural state and becoming carbon sinks, thereby decreasing the insulative effects of carbon in the atmosphere.

[@GeoBBB123]

@@S0ulinth3machin3 True. However, the densely populated parts of the Chinese regions of the Empire comprised a relatively small proportion of its total size.

[@S0ulinth3machin3]

@@GeoBBB123 by geographical area, sure, but it took the Mongols decades to conquer the Jin and Song Empires. Genghis Khan didn't even live to see the completion of the conquest of the Jin, let alone the Song. The Mongols had to absorb all sorts of new technology and methods of warfare to finally vanquish their enemies.

[@GeoBBB123]

@@S0ulinth3machin3 Well ... that fact would work in Alexander's favour ... No?

[@PhilipDarragh]

Alexander is the only conqueror 2 hv conquered the entire "known" world, and he did it 1,000 yrs B4 Genghis. Also, it was Subutai who was responsible 4 GK's greatest victories. Alexander was responsible 4 everyone of his victories. Also, Alexander was not a mass murderer. GK was the worst mass murderer in history. So, based on these facts. A-T-G is the greatest conqueror in all human history.😊

[@HistoryDropsHD]

@PhilipDarragh Hello. Thank you for taking the time to provide such detailed feedback. Being a pioneer (or one of the pioneers) in any field is certainly worthy of recognition; those who come after can learn from the accomplishments of their predecessors. We should clarify that Alexander did not conquer "the entire known world." In fact, as we explain in our new video comparing him to Julius Caesar, when Alexander died, he had plans to invade the Arabian Peninsula, the North African coast, and the Iberian Peninsula. Additionally, we believe it's somewhat unfair to attribute all of Genghis Khan's victories to Subutai while simultaneously neglecting to credit Alexander's subordinates, such as Parmenion, for their roles in his victories. Regarding the issue of being a mass murderer, studies certainly show that Genghis Khan was responsible for more deaths, but Alexander was far from innocent.

[@PhilipDarragh]

Tks 4 hr reply. U hv a great channel. What I mean, or what is meant by the known world, at least in Alexander's time is the following. There were no known empires in the Arabian Peninsula, or N Africa, or other parts of Europe tt Alexander cud hv known abt. Alexander was the first conqueror 2 hv a general staff. I did not say tt Subutai was responsible 4 all of GK's victories. I said Subutai was responsible 4 "some" of GK's greatest victories. As the old question is still relevant. When a student is told hw Caesar conquered Gaul, this is the student's question. "By himself, did he not even hv a cook with him?" Plse do a comparison btwn Alexander and GK 4A 12 yr period. Alexander accomplished all his work in a 12 yr period FM when he 1st became king. Compare tt 2 what GK accomplished in his 1st 12 yrs after becoming head of his tribe. That would BA better comparison of the 2. Looking forward 2 ur next video. Hv a great day. God bless.😊

[@agronregjepi2653]

Gengis Khan have mor 2.Millons Solgers ' Alexander only 13.000 Thousands Solger destroy ani Empires.

[@agronregjepi2653]

Alexander Great Albanian King.🇦🇱

[@marioshadjikyriacou3381]

🤣🤣🤣🤣