Ragnar’s sons are fan favorites, so Paradox includes them over more historical characters. The end of Ragnar, though most likely fictional, is such a cool story from the Norse sagas.
@Mecrobb Жыл бұрын
Snake pit op
@mrblackandwhite5104 Жыл бұрын
Well we defo know they all existed its just whether they were the sons of ragnar, we have records of ivar, halfdan and ubbe existing
@nikolaitregouet Жыл бұрын
@@mrblackandwhite5104bjorn also. They say “semi-hostoric”, but no, false. As both Frankish and Andalusian chronicles speak of him and Hasteinn
@demonic_myst4503 Жыл бұрын
You relise chronicles are also legends same as sagas
@demonic_myst4503 Жыл бұрын
The term chrinicles means a semi historical text that is exagerated with myths and legends
@Apollo1989V Жыл бұрын
Apparently, in the game’s code, Aethelred is given low fertility in order that it is likely that Alfred inherits. Maybe a Britian DLC will fix Anglo Saxon succession law.
@MCKevin289 Жыл бұрын
The Tip Vol 2 mod fixes that with Saxon elective. It works like tanistry and Scandinavian elective.
@williamstromme3949 Жыл бұрын
in game code as well he usually is scripted to die in a hunting event a couple of years into his reign before having the chance to have children
@seank2251 Жыл бұрын
i must of had terrible luck bc the only time i tried him my brother had multiple kids. felt bad, i don't wanna murder as alfred. ive never gone back since restarting over and over again in hopes my brother dies is not exactly what i would call fun.
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
Very interesting!
@Shinobimenace Жыл бұрын
I remember in one game he never died and Alfred never got to ascend to the throne and Wessex got and England got destroyed 😭😭
@RestingJudge Жыл бұрын
The genius of Alfred is fully on display with how he dealt with Guthrum. Alfred won the battle sure, but he didn't eradicate his enemy, he converted them to Christianity and became Guthrum's Godfather. I think Alfred knew he couldn't completely destroy the vikings, but he could get them closer to the Anglo Saxon culture, and make see themselves as distinct people aligned with the Saxons. With continued settlement I think Alfred might have noticed a distinct Anglo-Nose culture forming and rather than try to suppress it he used it to his advantage.
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
Very true!
@platypipope328 Жыл бұрын
it should be remembered that the whole of guthrum's army was essentially at alfred's mercy, and he very easily could have killed all of them should he have so wished. it seems that his decision was not purely one of political machinations, but also one based in alfred doing what he thought was the moral thing to do
@Apollo1989V Жыл бұрын
The people of Northumbria felt distinct from the rest of Anglo Saxons, so much so that they twice kicked out the house of Wessex in favor of Norse invaders.
@davescott7680 Жыл бұрын
@@Apollo1989VStill do feel pretty distinct. IMO Northerners culturally more similar to Scots and Irish then Southerners. It must have been much more dramatically distinct back then.
@nealjroberts4050 Жыл бұрын
Mercia essentially created the Anglo-Saxons through dominating the Saxons around the Thames valley/Estuary and the Angles south of the Humber. Northumbria was pretty much Angle dominated. The arrival of the Norse pretty much accented this divide and created a Saxon dominated south that then formed _Angle_ Land. It's notable that the English language formed after the Normans broke the Saxon vs Danish to-and-froing kingship is Midlands Angle derived rather than West Saxon.
@roberthudson3386 Жыл бұрын
Wessex, Northumbria and Mercia should be portrayed in game as kingdom level titles, not duchy level titles that fragment upon succession. Then have a decision to unite the titles and create England. In game England always gets formed and more or less always destroys the Danelaw, but in reality the formation of England was less traightforward than that. Also, in real life Northumbria clung on in the area around Lothian after the invasion, so the in-game invasion of Lothian by the Sudreyjar should be cut.
@penzorphallos3199 Жыл бұрын
In most of my games, they randomly still survive in some rump northern county. Is there an invasion condition for Ivar to gain every county he conquers?
@roberthudson3386 Жыл бұрын
@@penzorphallos3199 They sometime survive for me too, but then Boneless typically gets some counties in Lothian, resulting in border gore. I've had Lothian survive on its own, but typically not with all of Lothian. I think if Aella gets blood eagled after Whiteshirt defeats him in the war for Northumbria proper, and his son Aelfgar also dies in the war or some other way, this has resulted in partition succession between multiple female heirs on one or two occasions, so it splits into Lothian and Northumbria (because it takes a while for the Northumbria title to be destroyed after they lose all de jure counties) and the war doesn't continue against Lothian or something - I can't remember the exact circumstances but I think this is how it has happened. Usually when I play Boneless just takes the whole lot to be honest.
@Easy_2TTV Жыл бұрын
They are petty kingdoms, not duchies.
@roberthudson3386 Жыл бұрын
@@Easy_2TTV Petty Kingdom is a duchy-level title that exists in game in the Anglo Saxon culture (and other cultures) when the realm is independent. It's at the same rank as a duchy title however. My point was that IRL Wessex in 867 was pretty damn wealthy and powerful, and it should be considered a kingdom-level title. It's annoying that either the Danelaw is negotiated or Wessex splits into four on succession in the game (Alfred normally has a ton of kids).
@penzorphallos3199 Жыл бұрын
@@roberthudson3386 seems like the realm collapse problem could be solved by the seniority confederation law. Ck3 treats kingdom tiers as geographical system dependent realms, would probably break vanilla balance to have 5 tiny anglo kingdoms next to each other.
@roberthudson3386 Жыл бұрын
One other minor point that wasn't raised, the Brythonic kingdom of Strathclyde at that time contained significant parts of modern day north-west England, but is shown in game as being rather nerfed compared to its historical extent, with borders entirely within modern day Scotland. Some accounts put its southern frontier as far south as Lancashire, and certainly it included Cumbria at this time. Ironically in the game, the borders of the in-game Cumbrian culture match the borders of Strathclyde more or less correctly. No idea why they nerfed it, especially since in the 1066 start date Strathclyde (as a vassal of the Kingdom of Scotland) includes Cumbria.
@macinnes800ad10 ай бұрын
This actually really annoys me. It'd make forming a Yr Hen Ogledd easier if only by 1 county if they did give it to Strathclyde. Fun fact though, the Kingdom was actually know as Alt Clud (rock of the Clyde) until 870, where the Vikings sieged Alt Clut and sacked it, the nobility of the realm fleeing to Govan (a parish of modern Glasgow) and renamed the kingdom Strathclyde (valley of the Clyde) to reflect that they no longer lived on the rock of the Clyde
@Prece1ek Жыл бұрын
Love "the pit of snakes" from 20:06
@Waterm3lon335 Жыл бұрын
Lol
@ssphgamingrepublic1693 Жыл бұрын
England was actually named that in memory of St Edmund. He called himself king of the angles and Alfred the Great wanted to celebrate hame by naming the kingdom ‘Angleland’ which is now known as England!
@Wallachia_place05 күн бұрын
cap england is named after the Angles, which was a Sea Germanic tribe much like the saxons and norse, and they settled in East Anglia and Mierce or Mercia
@Garindo Жыл бұрын
They definitely need to add a struggle mechanic for the British isles like Iberia got it
@jeffreyhornblower6515 Жыл бұрын
No, thanks, that ruined Iberia for me
@fmshazam Жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyhornblower6515really? Why is that?
@advictoriamsshitposts8689 Жыл бұрын
@@fmshazamThe struggle sucks from a gameplay standpoint, bluntly.
@Superintendent8814 Жыл бұрын
@@fmshazam One example is if you conquer Iberia in the wrong phase you can't even form the empire title despite controlling everything. You may say why not just wait for the next phase, well you can't, if you control the entirety of Iberia the phase doesn't progress anymore, it's a poorly implemented system.
@fmshazam Жыл бұрын
@@Superintendent8814 ah ok, I see what you mean
@platypipope328 Жыл бұрын
alfred is unique in terms of gauging his historical character in that we can assess it not just from works written by other people, but works by alfred himself as he was an avid poet and scholar with many works written by alfred surviving to the present day.
@MuddaFocka Жыл бұрын
20:01 laughed so much harder than i should've. love this kind of content because half the reason i play these games are for the history. hope your channel grows!
@ramiromen6595 Жыл бұрын
The struggle of England is one of those weird anticlimaxes of history, almost 300 years of battle and in the end the winner is a third party (i know people define the normans as vikings but at that time i think they were their own thing)
@lesdodoclips3915 Жыл бұрын
It’s not really an anti climax. The Vikings returned in 1066 to try and reclaim England and were utterly destroyed. Ending that chapter of history and beginning the Anglo french rivalry.
@liamwaterman2065 Жыл бұрын
@@lesdodoclips3915yeah, "utterly destroyed" only 20 years after having successfully conquered all of England under Cnut. Plus the invasion in 1066 was only Norwegians, not Danes
@hunterhorsehelmsley7315 Жыл бұрын
@@liamwaterman2065They were still destroyed, lol. It doesn't matter what they did 20 years before that. They tried and lost.
@liamwaterman2065 Жыл бұрын
@@hunterhorsehelmsley7315 idc about the norwegians, Danes beat the Anglo Saxons, stay mad about it
@hunterhorsehelmsley7315 Жыл бұрын
@@liamwaterman2065 Not really. Cnut was a temporary win. The Normans beat the Anglos, stay mad about it
@94sjolander Жыл бұрын
17:40 Not the only one. King Canute the Great was also king of England.
@Kaiserfisk Жыл бұрын
i think he meant a king from England that became great
@smashdown958 Жыл бұрын
@@KaiserfiskCanute's epithet is literally 'the Great'
@Kaiserfisk Жыл бұрын
@@smashdown958 yes but he was born in Denmark and Edward the great was born France what I am trying to say was he was the only person born in England that was named the great
@GeoffreyBronsonАй бұрын
@@Kaiserfisk The video claimed "the only monarch or leader in English history" though, and Cnut applies to that definition.
@KaiserfiskАй бұрын
@@GeoffreyBronson true I was simply clarifying what I thought he meant
@claymathews8814 Жыл бұрын
I’m not sure how true this is, but I’ve heard that in Norway, calling someone “boneless” actually means that they are sneaky or crafty. If someone is so quiet they accidentally startle you, you might call them boneless. It’s possible that Ivar was a clever general who thought outside the box, earning the “boneless” moniker. Love the content guys, keep it up.
@oldyladАй бұрын
Modern meanings don’t neccesarily align with the original. I forget the word in danish, but Saturdays are basically called “bath day” and we’re the day in which old Norse took baths, but over time many Danes interpreted it as a sort of day for jokes because the words are more similar than the old Norse bath to the modern bath. It’s fairly interesting stuff. The impotence theory is based on records from the period
@jaysonm.7264 Жыл бұрын
The Last Kingdom is such a great show. If you haven't watched it, give it a chance!
@michaelhaderach277 Жыл бұрын
its actually pritty shit but the books on which the show is based are much better
@jaysonm.7264 Жыл бұрын
@@michaelhaderach277 I read the Pale Horseman and it is a great book. The show definitely has weaknesses, but overall I enjoyed it.
@michaelhaderach277 Жыл бұрын
@@jaysonm.7264 ye these are good. Did u start reading from the second book?
@jaysonm.7264 Жыл бұрын
@@michaelhaderach277 only the first 20 pages
@MausOfTheHouse Жыл бұрын
I seriously hope the upcoming Persia update adds more to the region
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
We’ll cover the Buyids and Seljuks in a video in the near future, also hoping for a good update
@hedgehog3180 Жыл бұрын
8:47 That's still the case today, leg and bone can both be translated as "ben" in Danish. These days "ben" is rarely used to refer to bones in general and more often to bones placed in a row like ribs or the bones in fish, or it refers to the material bones are made from. If you're referring to a specific bone you'd use "knogle" instead. It's still the name for legs in Danish though and there's no other word for legs in Danish. Also "løs" still has the same meaning in modern Danish. I think perhaps this is a case where some of the meaning gets lost in translation. In Danish an epithet like "den benløse" could be understand as meaning, without legs, without bones (as in missing some), or as spineless. It might be a combination of some or all three at the same time, that'd be pretty common.
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
In German you can also still use “Beine” (nowadays means legs) to refer to bones (“Knochen”)
@scoobydoo2587 Жыл бұрын
@@historyinbits "Gebeine" is somewhat more commonly used even today, referring to the (bony) remains of a person or animal
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
@@scoobydoo2587 ja voll, Bein kommt nur noch in alten idioms vor wie „durch Mark und Bein“
@scoobydoo2587 Жыл бұрын
@@historyinbits Ja, wobei es laut Wiktionary in den süddeutschen Gebieten auch noch verwendet wird. Ich komme aber aus Norddeutschland, hier ist es auf jeden Fall veraltet, also kann ich das schwer beurteilen.
@minnumseerrund Жыл бұрын
there's also the theory that it's a joke-name, similar to "Little" John being a huge bear of a man
@dieidiotten Жыл бұрын
also that king of cornwall has a rather large in game family tree and shares the dynasty with the king of brittany
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
Yea the early medieval rulers were fascinating in that region
@Zikos1127 Жыл бұрын
Great vid as always guys, been waiting for this one for ages and it's just as good as I hoped!
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@Zikos1127 Жыл бұрын
@@historyinbits no problem, keep up the great work!
@Bern_il_Cinq Жыл бұрын
It may have been wise to include Jarl Haesteinn in this as there are records of him pillaging English lands around this time. I think that it’s supposed to be historically debatable to have him depicted as “settling” Montaigu which is why he is shown with the Varangian Adventure ability to be able to relocate his Viking nation. I’ve seen a number of playthroughs where AI Haesteinn resettles in England so that might actually be a mechanic in the game.
@volpelastname6951 Жыл бұрын
He just has the Varangian Adventure casus belli because he's an Asatru ruler that isn't a king and has the traits Ambitious, Greedy and adventurer. He just meets a number of predetermined requirements for the AI to adventure. And he usually settles in England because the duchies are weak compared to the Karling horde that's nearby. For the first year after Northern Lords came out it was generally accepted that most games Haesteinn would Invade Kingdom against East Francia because it started really weak, then everyone would go independent and there would be extra disgusting borders in the region.
@snipenberg Жыл бұрын
I found your channel a couple days ago and found the topics you cover very entertaining and well researched. Coincidentally, when looking through your videos this is the exact topic I was curious if you'd covered lol. Glad to see this pop up on my feed.
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
What a nice coincidence :)
@dogeknight60002 ай бұрын
Showing footage of the last kingdom is just magnificent
@Hightop44 Жыл бұрын
I didn't see any other comments about it, and I thought some people would like to know so id like to point out that the pronunciation of Ragnarr's last name is a little off. it isn't pronounced as a D but rather TH. The letter that looks like a d is the old English/Norse letter eth. ð(eth) and þ(thorn) are both pronounced as a th-sound.
@turmuthoer Жыл бұрын
I personally hate how, in both CK2 and CK3, Jorvik annexes all of Northumbria if they win the war. Historically, Bernicia (modern-day Northumberland, County Durham, Berwickshire and Lothian) remained an independent Anglo-Saxon rump state which was ruled from Bamburgh after the initial invasion (as seen in the maps at 7:34 and 7:40). While its kings were subservient to the Danes, it wasn't conquered by the Great Heathen Army and was never part of the Danelaw.
@roberthudson3386 Жыл бұрын
In CK3, Lothian gets annexed by the Sudrejyar, which is even more historically incorrect!
@beepboopbeepp Жыл бұрын
I love your vids, please make some with imperator rome map as well
@TheEnecca28 күн бұрын
This kind of videos are really great. Amy plans for covering the new startdate?
@Magnus_Mundus Жыл бұрын
I laughed so hard at 14:59! Seeing nostalgic and joyful Wicki-Footage, which just shot right in my heart, and hearing "... killing the enteire poulation of the place💀" 🤣
@CaravanCzar Жыл бұрын
Must be something in the zeitgeist, because I just started a playthrough as Alfred a couple weeks ago. Due to my busy schedule, I have only been able to play up until the year 900, and Alfred just died and left to his three sons the kingdoms of England, Wales, and Brittany, with the King of England also inheriting the Duchy of Neustria (what will become Normandy), basically playing the Uno Reverse Card on France 166 years early.
@marcfrancisteodoro7720 Жыл бұрын
Amazing video!
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@IronWolf123 Жыл бұрын
In The Last Kingdom, they mentioned London was a part of Mercia
@mappingshaman52802 ай бұрын
It was historically disputed between mercia and wessex.
@Sir_Gerald_Nosehairs. Жыл бұрын
Eh, Paradox is a Swedish company, can't blame them for over-egging the pudding a bit where their own are concerned. I was more miffed by that Assassins Creed game, where we English were the ones being invaded and murdered, yet we were *still* the villains of the game!!
@mappingshaman52802 ай бұрын
Well western culture glorifies badass raping and pillaging vikings over pacifist anglo saxon monks.
@Fabrissable Жыл бұрын
Can you do a video about western slavic / baltic tribes please? I think they are also very commonly played start in 867 CK3 and very easy introduction to tribal mechanics and this region has a lot of unknown history to many people, while many things happening there during period of CK3.
@EdmundSkye Жыл бұрын
If you capture the jarl of Northumbria as one of Ragnar's sons you get an event where you can execute him via blood eagle.
@funbucket092 ай бұрын
Yea I did that. Good boost of dread too
@mencko3058 Жыл бұрын
really enjoyed this
@Aka_plays. Жыл бұрын
I've no idea why Para made the Anglo Saxon rulers just Dukes and I hate it.
@JohnSmith-rk7zy Жыл бұрын
It represents their status as Petty Kings I think.
@Aka_plays. Жыл бұрын
@@JohnSmith-rk7zy Yeah but they were actual Kings, with courts and everything
@battlez9577 Жыл бұрын
Everyone had courts but its just an in game decision to make a single de jure kingdom in 867 set up
@JohnSmith-rk7zy Жыл бұрын
@@battlez9577 Maybe it could be small de jure kingdoms merge, like the decision to unite the crowns of Castile
@JohnSmith-rk7zy Жыл бұрын
@@Aka_plays. yeah, a united the crowns of Castile mechanics could be good, imo the smaller heptarchy kingdoms like Kent or Sussex are too small to justify being kingdom rank titles.
@Septimius_The_Seventh Жыл бұрын
Great video! I think it would be cool if you covered India in CK3
@chapter_129 Жыл бұрын
Do one about Wales!
@bradleyn9360 Жыл бұрын
Love this video and subbed because of it! I think your pronunciation is off on the Vikings based off the Vikings shows and how they pronounced it (totally guessing here, but it stood out to me as I imagine they would have it accurate)
@CommissarMitch Жыл бұрын
Love to see Scandis in this. Very cool.
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
We might cover Eric the Heathen in the future as well!
@CommissarMitch Жыл бұрын
@historyinbits As a Swede I would actually appreciate coverage of the 1066 Scandinavian Kings in general, and maybe throw in the Russians we know as well. I will gladly help if I can.
@SennaAugustus Жыл бұрын
Will you do a video of England 1066? We know some of the more important bits, but there are some other interesting stuff too, like Countess Margaret Eadwardsdohtor of Staffordshire, aka Margaret of Wessex and later of Scotland and Saint Margaret, and Gytha Haroldsdohtor, aka Gytha of Wessex and later of Kiev and probably died in the First Crusade as well or maybe not, and whose is an ancestor of Charles III.
@josiahr7069 Жыл бұрын
You should do a collab with Cambrian Chronicles!
@albinlindberg876 Жыл бұрын
17:25 Wasn't Knut the Great proclaimed as such, or is it just in Scandinavian chronicles?
@divineatmidnight4 ай бұрын
i know this is like a year later and I dont want to be a prick but what you are pronouncing as 'lodbrok' is actually 'lothbrok' the ð letter is an old and middle english letter, that is still present in icelandic
@Radoniel Жыл бұрын
i love that you used some Wickie bits :))))
@michaeluhrig6957 Жыл бұрын
Sad that he didn't mention of how they made Dyre the Stranger a descendent of Ragnar.
@EkoFranko Жыл бұрын
This is too stupid to even talk about. They also forgot about Askold.
@sahilhossain8204 Жыл бұрын
Lore of Alfred the Great against the Vikings: How realistic is England in CK3? Momentum 100
@0th_Law Жыл бұрын
17:30 Cnut was also a significant figure in English history. Sure, he wasn’t English himself, but…
@scottclark5334 Жыл бұрын
Do scotland next please
@Jo-Heike2 ай бұрын
It's downright criminal that the legendary first king of Norway, Harald Fairhair being in the game doesn't get a mention in any of your three videos about the Norse rulers.
@historyinbits2 ай бұрын
Well thank you for the feedback! And for watching all three of the videos :)
@nicolasgonzalez629 Жыл бұрын
I love these videos
@Mcqdot Жыл бұрын
Can you review how accurate the papacy is
@acqua33410 ай бұрын
Hasteinn is related with Bjornn in ck3 too
@adrix_wastaken2196 Жыл бұрын
As a norse person it would Make more sense for Ivar to be the legless as we only use “ben” for bones if its something we Eat or give to the dog fx while we would say ‘knogle’ for any anatomical terms for a bone so pretty much his bones would be “hans knogler”
@modelnanpresident Жыл бұрын
Great video
@barriath8841 Жыл бұрын
So Ragnarr is the equivalent of Arthur Pendragon because there is such mythology growing on those two characters.
@pascalstrijker39859 ай бұрын
Alfred the great is my personal favourite character to play in CK3 and I dont understand why the game says its a hard start as he is so OP you can form England with him and with luck and some good allies form Brittania in a few generations.
@pickle4422 Жыл бұрын
Imagine telling some random dude off for burning your cakes, then after he leaves you realize it was the King. She probably spent the rest of her life worrying that someone would come and whack her for telling the King off.
@carltonleboss Жыл бұрын
Well, I wouldn't trust Alfred to bake a cake, anyway...
@vikivegetar1416 Жыл бұрын
I am danish and i am proud to say that i am a “viking” 🙃 But could you next talk about sicilia or just Italia
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
We have some content on Northern Italy!
@vikivegetar1416 Жыл бұрын
@@historyinbits thanks glad to hear it❤️
@bog300 Жыл бұрын
IIRC The Starement "Alfred was the only monarch in english history to have the epithet "The Great" " is inacurate. King Cnut the Great also shared the epithet however was the combined king of England, Denmark and Norway (this is what the North Sea Empire decisionis based on)
@seank2251 Жыл бұрын
the only time i played as alfred, my brother totally had kids. absolutely ruined my appetite to play as alfred, maybe ill try him again at some point.
@alliecore225 Жыл бұрын
Wtf that pronouncation of Björn was like almost perfect, I just expected you to pronounce it "bjorn" like most people do.
@MrDKH10 ай бұрын
Alfred the Great is not the only monarch in English history to be called the "great." Canute the Great for some reason is ignored in history discussions of the following period.
@ashtonbarwick6696 Жыл бұрын
Paradox should be employing you. Your succession system advice was solid for Anglo Saxon England. Not like what high medieval England was like
@TheRealKiRBEY Жыл бұрын
Subtitles Jumpscare
@andyhx2 Жыл бұрын
You could have touched upon Wales while you were at it. But I suppose you could make a separate video about hisoricity of the rest of Britain and Ireland.
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
Yea that’s the plan :)
@Stettafire Жыл бұрын
No, should be seperate. They're not the same
@00martoneniris86 Жыл бұрын
COUD You make an video about Poland Hungary and Nubia
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
We’ll look into it! :)
@hebanczarny84 Жыл бұрын
One question: Why you don't have DLCs? Lack of money or anti-dlc policy?
@funbucket092 ай бұрын
What DLCs are the good ones?
@hebanczarny842 ай бұрын
@@funbucket09 for example Northern Lords
@funbucket092 ай бұрын
@@hebanczarny84 I'll have to have a look. There is always so many dlcs for paradox games I don't know which ones are worth it. The descriptions sometimes sound good but then it ends up sucking.
@decariusb714 ай бұрын
I don’t understand how everyone views Wessex and Alfred as “the good guys”. If only the sons of the GREAT Ragnar would’ve worked together….
@mappingshaman52802 ай бұрын
Because they were the ones on defense. The vikings were trying to colonise england and wessex and alfred the great were trying to stop them. Wessex was in a comparable position to the christians in Spain during the reconquista
@dovydas2278 Жыл бұрын
what is the cartoon at 15:00
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicky_the_Viking :)
@dovydas2278 Жыл бұрын
@@historyinbits thank you!
@theprinceofawesomeness Жыл бұрын
i'm thinking the Viking brothers might be Blood Brothers rather than genetic brothers, kind of like how Loki and Oden are
@mappingshaman52802 ай бұрын
The worst thing about alfred the great is that he wasnt a mercian!
@Sprejxen Жыл бұрын
From what i know its scripted for the king of wessex to die in battle in around 2-3 years after the start of the game Edit: Also there is special succession law for saxon kingdoms which i dont know how close to real the one is
@aethelfrith7376 Жыл бұрын
Kievan Rus'! When?
@historyinbits Жыл бұрын
We’ll look into it!
@GeoffreyBronsonАй бұрын
"He is the only leader in English history with the epithet the Great" - that's where you're wrong bucko, Cnut ;) Good video though.
@partydean17 Жыл бұрын
I was hoping someone could explain something to me. Why does a viking car about his claim on Dublin? Isnt claims sort of a civil society thing or between christian nations a way that war is justified through a right to property? If the vikings were raiding why do they care? Is it that the local mayors of Ireland would respect their overlords claim? I dont get why a heathen cares
@battlez9577 Жыл бұрын
Because dublin was founded by the norse and a claim helps bind your men to fight and die for you
@pl-AEtheRR Жыл бұрын
Being non-Christian doesn't make one a savage. Danes and Northmen had codes of honour and conduct (though they probably only abode by them quite loosely, just like knights did), they had complex societal rules, a government system involving a fair bit of direct democracy, and they did indeed possess the notion of personal ownership. Not to mention, we have many examples of dynastic struggles for land and titles in Scandinavian writings - Ragnar Lodbrok himself was supposedly involved in a dynastic war for Uppland. So my answer to you is another question: why *wouldn't* a "heathen" care about his perceived right, by blood, to rule over certain lands?
@Stejers Жыл бұрын
Dont forget that king Knut of denmark, norway and england was also called "the great"
@abcede3897 Жыл бұрын
8:39 sounds like bs 😅 more like "spineless" - cruel or without honor
@hagymascsiposgyros5780 Жыл бұрын
england lore
@treyprice-wl6kg Жыл бұрын
This is good - or you can just watch the first 3 seasons of The Last Kingdom LOL
@RashidAli-fb3se Жыл бұрын
In the midirvak period it was not rare for people to live more than 100 years since th4 diseases caused by pollution didn't exist and if you could eat a healthy diet which was the luxury food of that time and as well as do sport and exercise to burn calories and stimulate the body which Ragnar did through raiding fighting wars and battles and getting the spill necessary to buy the luxury Ragnar eaten a lot of mess and chicken and had vegetables but mostly meat and vegetables acted to give him what meats don't have while meat gave him what vegetables didn't have as well as high calories and others vitamins through many vegetables and meats and fruits and with the fighting and raidings which required a lot of movement for him and since he didn't have a horse and did using through walking or the sea he did burn a lot of calories so he didn't get a lot of fat and thus remained healthy all pr most of his life until his death and his wealth and inheritance was decided between his sons and they used it to gather the great heathen army and invade england since an army of such a size can't easily be built without the power of king of a Scandinavian kingdom and since his sons where only jarls this is understandable
@funbucket092 ай бұрын
K.
@WinnieTehPoop Жыл бұрын
Good content, looks like you got a new subsciber. What are waiting most in upcoming persia dlc ?