Algorithmic Trading Using Python #13 - Crypto Trading Bots

[@TradeOptionsWithMe]

Enjoying my free algorithmic trading course? If so, you can now support me by signing up to my Patreon: www.patreon.com/TradeOptionsWithMe

[@Noddy704]

these tutorials are so good....soooo good... i like how u never leave anything out, even little files and u always go over and edit to clarify things, thank you

[@TradeOptionsWithMe]

Happy to hear that you like the series!

[@RobinArgumido]

Trading bots are mostly scams... but there are exceptions. You just need a lot a patience to backtest and run many bots, discard the ones that are scams and keep playing with the ones that are good. EDIT: since so many of you ask, yes I use Galileo FX..

[@saumitrakarmakar8336]

how can we write algorithms for crypto options

[@twoandhalfbengals]

What should I check if backtest works but not livetrading or paper trading?

[@stevelassu7156]

SyntaxError when using "continue" within the code. Spacing is exactly as per your video.

[@TradeOptionsWithMe]

Try using the link in the description box to clone my code, if that doesn’t work, please let me know!

[@Arstotzka]

I didn't think about creating a class for each symbol, instead I re-updated a single indicator in a for loop for every symbol 😂

[@ashtonwagner7566]

Hi! Can you do an EMA crypto strategy where we buy when the 30 day EMA crosses over the 55 day? This is a great strategy for crypto and I'm sure it would also work for stocks

[@jamesjames54]

Really great video series. One question: If we are already parsing minimumVolume and Self as arguments in the Pair class, then why do we have to save minimumVolume as a class variable under init? Wouldnt the Pair class still work without doing so?

[@TheWebBrothers]

can we negotiate and you help me build a simple robot based on one or two indicators bro

[@ezohn]

thanks for sharing. Stupid Python question: why "algorithm" (what does it refer to?) in the constructor class Pair: def __init__(self, algorithm, ticker, minimumVolume):... thanks. best

[@TradeOptionsWithMe]

We use it to pass our algorithm class to the Pair class so that we can use the QCAlgorithm class helper methods here too.

[@ezohn]

many thanks for your answer. Thanks again for all what u share. Best

[@edwinbab705]

I sold call option for Nov 19th and stock is going above my strike so what best to do

[@alexanderdekrout3967]

Thank you so much for your videos! I do have a question though, If I would want to use a custom timeframe and custom indicators with that timeframe, the place for consolidating the data and the rolling windows of data and the indicators would be the inside the Pair class, right? I am a bit confused about where to put the event handler for those. Thanks in advance!

[@TradeOptionsWithMe]

Thanks for the comment. Firstly, you would want to up the resolution inside of the init constructor of the Pair class. I would also initialize the consolidators/rolling windows there. You could then add the event handler as a method to the Pair class.

[@alexanderdekrout3967]

@@TradeOptionsWithMe Thanks for your fast and so helpful reply! I will try that.

[@samikatta6268]

I get an error in line 36 saying that "continue is not in the proper loop" How can i fix that? Thank you in advance

[@TradeOptionsWithMe]

My guess would be that there is something wrong with your indentation. I recommend just using the link in the description box to clone my code, if that doesn’t work, definitely let me know,

[@harrybellingham98]

Can you do one for futures?

[@TradeOptionsWithMe]

Thanks for the comment. I'll keep your suggestion in mind for future videos. Firstly, I will cover the algorithm framework in the next videos, but after that, I could create a video on futures.

[@bruv-lz4fh]

Interestingly line 15 had a syntax error at "for" and i have no idea why. Tried everything for a tab to no space between at all all the way to spamming space like my life was dependent on it Copying your code fixed it though. I have 0 idea why Also continue gave a bunch of crap. Assuming its due to not being in a loop. pass should be a good replacement though since its not in a loop and does not need to iterate again