All Hollywood VFX Removed! What Movies Really Look Like

Get some cool drag & drop VFX here! ► www.famefocus.com/go/getvfx/ ◄
It used to be that what you saw on a movie set would pretty much be what you saw in the final movie. If you wanted to have a mountain in the background, you'd have to go to one.
However with modern technology, CGI has made it possible to have that mountain in the background without even leaving your home. Just whip up a green screen and you're good to go!
This advancement in technology has meant for some big differences between what is filmed and what we see in the final movie.
Here are some Hollywood movies without the VFX applied!
Enjoy :)
Read more here: www.famefocus.com
Follow us on Twitter: / focusfame

[@_M_D_M_]

Somebody should CGI me at my office seat Monday to Friday.

[@hmzh94]

that's brilliant

[@crustyou]

CGI= Corporate Governance Illusion

[@multiversescriptutes8400]

Manish Mahanti 😂😂😂😂😂

[@snowray9645]

haahaaa

[@UriyahYasharal]

If only! Lol.

[@mightybitchy]

I wish I could see Jurassic World without the CGI. It would turn into the best comedy of the year, I think.

[@gucciguccigucci8082]

M Jurassic park was very well done

[@donkeykong4983]

Ikr lmfao

[@McL0VINNN]

Directed by Mel Brooks

[@purpledragon1945]

@@gucciguccigucci8082 jurassic park used realistic animatronics so I'd imagine it's still look mostly the same without CGI

[@soardev]

Damnit blue get over here (Chris Pratt saying that to a guy in spandex with a half cut foam raptor head lol)

[@CaptainVelveeta]

I got a degree in RTF (radio, television and film) but ended up going a totally different direction down the road and became a registered nurse. The only thing I hate is everything I learned in pursuing my RTF degree totally takes the fun out of watching movies, especially these days when, like you said, there's much more CGI than most people realize.

[@fernandofaria2872]

Im the opposite. Worked as an anesthesiologist, and now I am studying cinema in college :p You are absolutely right about taking the fun out of watching movies, its like learning how to do a magic trick xD

[@RADC00N]

Life of Pi: 0:22 Captain America: Civil War: 0:49 The Wolf of Wall Street: 1:16 Gravity: 1:37 Godzilla: 1:58 Jurassic World: 2:20 Hope this helped! ^^

[@oldiessoul3556]

Thank you

[@TedEhioghae]

Batman vs Superman?

[@notanexamplecltv]

Just gotta say I love this channel cause it gets straight to the point and doesn’t talk about 1 topic for 5 minutes at a time. Great video

[@ratchet7201]

That Thumnail though 👏👏

[@abushauzabmughal7159]

Mr Insane Gremlin 1st 2w3eer445566788o999

[@bayektekeyekkeyek53]

the stunt is naked

[@browngirlinaclownworld2077]

I wanted to see bald, naked men in dinosaur costumes goddamn it!

[@mariaelenapalaciosalegria5191]

Mr Insane Gremlin s

[@HeyItsGCA]

Those people were naked

[@familyfreedomfinancial]

There are often times where I wish certain movies used more practical effects than CGI, but the things that we can achieve with CGI is truly amazing and fun to watch.

[@morganmorgym]

Can you imagine how uninspired today's actors must feel, having to stare at nothing but expanses of green screen. I'd go crazy. Props to these actors.

[@octo.lina69]

M. Morgan Yes, props to those over paid actors😒

[@octo.lina69]

@Fandom Tribal What is wrong with you😂😩

[@octo.lina69]

@Fandom Tribal Are u saying autist as autism?you're crazy Lol!

[@slinkyatrest]

I always wondered if spending days on end staring at those bright green walls doesnt start to screw with your eye sight.

[@missshannonsunshine]

Lina** Jae if not for consumers, they wouldn’t be so over paid We’re paying them lol

[@Jacob_Roberts]

Thank you. This is the most interesting video you've made. The CGI is generated so fast in most of your videos that I can't tell what the actors actually see. This video shows me exactly what the actors actually see. Please make more videos of *_this_* type in the future.

[@3dcharacterartist649]

I love videos that highlight the invisible VFX that we never even question. In Gravity, there are portions of the scenes where parts of Sandra Bullock are entirely CG and comped together to allow it to look like she's floating. In Civil War not just the airport was CG, but also pretty much every time Spider-Man and Black Panther are on screen they are VFX. There are lots of instances where movies that aren't about fantastical events use CG to enhance composition, to put actors together that couldn't be there on the day or just to create an idealized environment. The film 100 Foot Journey is a good example of this. Cheers!

[@Mark-yb1sp]

I think my first wife was a CGI because in the end, she really wasn't there for me.

[@zack1634]

Sad

[@acetv01]

Hug to hug

[@Magnusssss255]

@@SparklingWater445 rude

[@musasizigodfreydixion6231]

Hahaha.Help me with her contact number.

[@paramkaur546]

Awww I’m so sorry

[@Ryan-yq2up]

That tiger was the best cgi I have ever seen

[@harcourtmireault1268]

Yes I agree!

[@jatingupta3929]

that was a real tiger composed with that shot. Because shot was still and people were added afterwards, so it's easy to compose that shot. It was not CGI

[@Crowbar]

the best CGI is in the new Blade Runner movie

[@himanshumagar]

Intelligent Fool there was no tiger on the set, it's complete CGI you fucking idiot

[@FabledGentleman]

The truth is actually that it's both. It's mostly CGI but in some scenes they had to use a real Tiger.

[@user-dq4qw2kp9p]

This is awesome. Clear, concise, a little amusing, informative and to the point. Thanks.

[@burnt7882]

I can imagine being the camera man for Jurrasic world and getting a heart attack from laughing.

[@iyos5568]

I cant.

[@tumkoiaurmainahiaap2308]

I can't stop my laugh by imaging that

[@abdulbasit-cn9ek]

2:35

[@asmaaxpz9794]

The actors are truly amazing , they make us believe that they are seeing things that doesn't Even exist duh ..*-*

[@thevillain6761]

Cozz they have tO act,, its their job✌🏾😎

[@nigelnikskull]

You know why they are so good at acting? They simply pretend to be the person that they are portraying in the movie

[@muhamadnasir4573]

4301

[@yaoreivashiwo5432]

Most of the fighting scene in Hollywood movies are often times a Chinese stuntman, and not the actors acts that they show us on the screen.

[@joewoodchuck3824]

I always assumed actors were given a substitute target to look at.

[@rahul-qm9fi]

Batman V Superman was released in 2016 not 2012.

[@mazinbajalan4334]

no , it was released in 2012

[@mazinbajalan4334]

rahul it was 2012 , check imdb

[@mazinbajalan4334]

dude chill i'm joking :D

[@igloozoo8245]

how is i am legend involved in the release of BvS? and how did it predict the movie

[@igloozoo8245]

Nikey Pickles I totally fucking forgot about that!

[@collinscameron686]

Showing the frame of reference is always interesting. Keep them coming.

[@RonPaulRevolution500]

One of the few times i actually love yt recs. Just got a green screen, already knowing how to key.. and my mind is going crazy with ideas. It's crazy what you can do as long as you know how to edit. I bet some of these movies could have saved a lot of money doing it right.. Then again, it depends on how much they're paying these people, doing the ocd style of editing required.

[@TheChromaKid]

I don't get it when people complain about replacing backgrounds with vfx. They've always done it, just it used to be with a painting on a piece of glass infront of the camera lined up to the horizon line

[@maxboissiere4806]

TheChromaKid I did a cool vid where I did a bg replacement

[@senorsock21]

wow! this is incredible! huge props to the visual effects teams that put all this stuff together! I imagine it's an incredibly grueling and daunting task!

[@shlok.mehrotra]

is this video real?

[@RUMPLEforeskin25]

Hollywood is gay

[@Buggolious]

yea@@shlok.mehrotra

[@ytb632]

Features of movies has been really fantastic with these effects. Thanks for it.

[@rexxsade6425]

Future CGI no need for actors and actresses. Just they photos.

[@opus53waldstein70]

hahaha every visual effects studio will have its own sets of digital actors I wonder what names they will be given.. modelA, modelB, modelC?

[@itechiwizard83]

They will be very realistic animations.

[@BagzAndPresident]

Deepfake

[@xuxnt8961]

why the pay more to actors than editors

[@rolandgargarion6542]

Editors do get paid a lot! Just not as much as actors. But the problem is, there are many more tech savvy editors in the world than Tom Hanks's or Anne Hathaways who can play any character.

[@aripocki]

Editors don't have the same charisma and suave as good actors.

[@zilun]

Editors don't draw people to buy tickets. That's also the same reason to why some actors get paid more than master filmmakers. It's unfair but that's just how businesses work. Studio can replace ILM with another studio and maybe people whine a bit about bad CG, but people will still go. Studio replace A-lister with someone with lesser ticket draw and people won't go.

[@HitBoxMaster]

It doesn't really matter if you can play anyone if you suck at it

[@TryptychUK]

Editors don't do visual effects.

[@monbon5072]

Only here cause of the nude guys dressed as dinasuors

[@sardarpatelgroup9974]

Mon Bon hello

[@justanotherutuber3]

why are they naked

[@justanotherutuber3]

fenris6051 how are they dressed?

[@Lisa-wc3vz]

It actually makes you appreciate modern actors so much because how difficult would it be to immerse yourself in the story when you're surrounded by stupid green screens? I think it's amazing what people can do with effects now, but man. I wouldn't want to act in that environment.

[@nomaschalupas2453]

@@Lisa-wc3vz so you rather be in a burning desert with a sandstorm going on, Or a mountain freezing in a blizzard?

[@Its__Good]

One day even the green screens will be added by cgi.

[@cumbucket1017]

Making them Complety useless and unnecessary. If you have that technology, why would you use it to add a greenscreen?

[@loganathand7271]

@@cumbucket1017Fri aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

[@Jacobsladder1993]

CumBucket101 it could allow room for versatility on set.

[@forfunely1240]

Look into LED virtual screens. Your right now

[@KingJulienMoto]

@@cumbucket1017 jfc😓🤧

[@jmb96]

Good content, no ads. Perfect.

[@hrudayrunmachine1951]

Even it is CGI ,they need to do a good acting ....by imagination.......

[@rajeshsur8098]

hruday panthangi p

[@thecampfirepodcast3105]

Every actor worth his salt will say acting is 90 percent reaction...you cannot properly act while "pretending" something or someone is there...performances will always be stifled because of this

[@KConechannelformanyhelps]

hruday panthangi Nice video , You can also able to do this from Your android phone , See this kzbin.info/www/bejne/rquldp2cZ69rbpY Also subscribe my channel for tech related videos, and for reviews of new and good movies . My channel link kzbin.info/door/NhNerCEKE6bPEwaCyA1ZIw More videos #kconechannelformanyhelps

[@TheKekke]

This is awesome! Amazing what you can do with a green screen. :)

[@PeKey0815]

Sorry, but the airport in civil war is real. I live in this city and the airport was blocked the whole time of the movie making. The actors was there too. Funny fact: in the movie they said the scene plays in Berlin. But that isnt the Berlin airport. Its the airport of Leipzig/Halle. Its a complete different german state.

[@donciotti3639]

Watching this makes you realise how much work went into films before all this technology...

[@Yvory6]

the guys in the raptors suit look like a bunch of winners^^

[@katt1936]

It truly amazes me how far ahead technology has brought us with special fx. Movies and tv shows just are not the same anymore.

[@TerryRippington]

Props to sir Ian McKellan in the Hobbit. Most of his acting in the series was only him surrounded by green screen talking to himself and having to imagine a hobbit and eleven dwarves around him.

[@danielahmed935]

Wow what you are showing us is magnificent 🙌👏👏👏👏🙌 Can I see the movie seen behind "under world" any of the series .

[@gerwal7021]

1:56 WHERE IS HER HEAD?

[@cubneb2663]

RIp

[@erickherrera7947]

Boowser2 that's the CGI part before they put actor in the scene

[@blzahz7633]

Invisible man... IN SPACE!!

[@worshiplennyfaces449]

Godzillla ate it

[@woodpecker9944]

She done went 🐢 mode

[@jeremiahrodriguez9364]

Dawn of justice is in 2016 not 2012

[@lunchboxproductions7139]

Jeremiah Rodriguez I noticed that and I was really confused lol

[@clunkybumpkin3018]

Yeah i freaked out a little bit ha

[@rainbowvexe5353]

I thought I was going crazy

[@lilspeddie7229]

Jeremiah Rodriguez thats what i was about to say hey atleast so.eone knows

[@opaskilylamoon9919]

OMG BRUH THANK YOU. I THOUGHT I WAS AGING AT THE RATE OF A FRUIT FLY O.O

[@dimodelchev868]

Imagine what is in the head of each actor. To show any emotion that comes to mind without any external trigger, this is astonishing

[@BrandonON]

How Technology is changing everything 🙌

[@Clustersey]

2:25 Haters will say the Raptors are fake.

[@ariswiftgrande]

HUGE RESPECT FOR THE CREWS AND STAFF OF THESE MOVIES!!

[@deoxysoverlord8710]

-THAT'S IT!?- Wow, great video! 😊👍

[@Hidden-bull]

Now I'm sure that I'm living in 21th century This is beyond technology

[@SharlenesJourney]

This video really answered a lot of my questions I always wondered how super hero movies were made

[@johnreneirtorres]

What?? Godzilla is CGI??? I thought its real

[@jskabs4750]

John Reneir Torres xD

[@johnreneirtorres]

Bo Lep i got second thought of godzilla is fake im asian so i know godzilla more than the westerner

[@pekasboo451]

Boi

[@Jie_Da197]

Bo Lep lol

[@maxtoganlaw]

godzilla are real. human are cgi

[@TSLstudio2010]

In my country there's a director and he doesn't like greenscreens. He prefers using real landscapes as main backgrounds here in Europe :) Looks always great!

[@wimswimz7767]

Amazing work, good job:)

[@abhishekmahendru1583]

Wtf, I seriously thought Gravity was real and so were all the scenes shot in this movies. I even planned a vacation at Jurassic World for a week so I could pet a raptor. My whole life is a lie.

[@alpin5861]

u r a lie buddy! ask your mom! 😂😂😂 cutiya

[@digest9144]

Khan's Edit what?

[@warningyouareapproachingaf7685]

Abhishek Mahendru lol

[@atomm4675]

Welcome to reality.

[@likesubcribeandalsocomment5330]

lol

[@dmitche06]

batman v superman came out in '16 not '12.

[@sjmovies2008]

dmitche06 that's right

[@farce2734]

ikr I thought I was already that old

[@dmitche06]

LordFarce lol right!

[@ashleenicole3375]

Naa man pud sa 2012 lahi man gud iyang gi explain

[@ashleenicole3375]

Mag boot man mo

[@lonephoenix7814]

Always cool to see how they did it. I wish all movies had a behind the scenes of special shots on how they did it...

[@MrSanjubn]

So basically the CGI guy who does all these is the ultimate Hero 👍

[@abcnt]

It is a bit funny how over the years our eyes (or at least mine) are fooled by what is CGI and what is not. When a new movie comes out with special effects or CGI it looks so real you are fooled to believe it's the real deal, but when you go back a few months or even a year it's almost like that Image or effect just pops out and just looks out of place.

[@ZacHawkins42]

Absent I know, right? Just look at the old nasa footage compared to what they make today.

[@geminirox8635]

for the same reason the nintendo 64 use to have amazing graphics. the peak technology will always look the best until its old

[@RisingKaur]

Reality vs Virtual World ✅

[@Paulshivam_]

Rising Kaur u are everywhere girl 😂😂🤣

[@PerfectAlibi1]

I reject your reality and substitute my own! ^^

[@atmiatmi5231]

AZERTYC

[@atmiatmi5231]

+Radicaldanny XXXX

[@communitywatch1687]

Rising Kaur Ok

[@aymuammosmiom4091]

I love this. Movie magic behind the scenes. I'm learning all about the movie magic too! Yes ya'll!

[@sirveillance9080]

Now let's say they collaborate with NASA. That does raise a few pertinent questions.

[@DREAM_BIG793]

Yeah ook

[@sam100bars5]

Christopher Nolan is the only director who uses less CGI ,good work man

[@poliknoy]

Sam sharma that’s true. He tries to use as much practical effects as possible. If they’re supposed to be in the ocean, he actually films in the ocean

[@tryhardgaminghd3166]

Yeah but then it ends up looking bland, like in Dunkirk where there is supposedly a massive evacuation which involved many people, machinery and animals. Yet all we see is a mostly empty stretch of beach with men lining up and cowering on or near a pier. Keep in mind, History Buffs brought this to mine and others attention with his video on Dunkirk and the limits it sets on itself by using practical effects.

[@patrickbateman838]

Quentin Tarantino?

[@Peter_1986]

@@tryhardgaminghd3166 If reality is available, then it will always look more convincing than CGI - _obviously._ Like for example, try using CGI to fake the gravity shifts in Fred Astaire's "Ceiling Dance" and make it look just as convincing - you won't be able to do that, because there is nothing to improve there. The room _actually did_ spin around so that the gravity shifts were _real_ from Fred Astaire's own perspective, and you cannot improve physical reality. Same thing with the zero gravity scenes in "Apollo 13"; the apparent weightlessness in those scenes was real as well, because they actually were subjected to zero gravity for real by riding a Zero-G airplane. You cannot improve that either with any amount of CGI whatsoever, because computer animations can never look more real than reality itself.

[@eledwyn100]

i love CGI ,That's the smart way of creating something that looks real while saving money ................... More CGI please :-)

[@LifeAsAPotato]

Wtf no less cgi

[@maxboissiere4806]

ed wyn actually CGI cost a lot more than renting locations and the cost of modelling texturing animation and finally compositing into a scene makes it a lot more expensive.

[@stankamijanovic7172]

Amaizing video i didn't know all of this stuff. Thanks for this

[@greenscreenmovieeffects5718]

This is fantastic thank you for sharing

[@mascoehiomele2889]

[phone] Sé de un gran hombre en África que me ayudó a traer de vuelta a mi ex esposa que me dejó después de tres años de casado, tenemos un hijo ahora estamos juntos como uno. Así que puedes contactar a este genial en whatsapp. Conozco a un gran hombre en África. que me ayudaron a traer de vuelta a mi ex esposa que me dejó después de tres años de casado, tenemos un hijo ahora estamos juntos como uno. WhatsApp [phone]💛💛💛💛💛

[@Black-fj9yi]

Awesome dude and thanks

[@HJROCKEDITZ]

ROCKING AANGLE I AM SUBSCRIBING TO ANYONE WHO SUBSCRIBE BACK MY NOTIFICATION IS ON..

[@waysady2646]

As a men DON'T lose your sperm by sex behaviour, This thing can create human, So you know how important it is for human health.

[@arkhamsquadgaming6192]

Don't care as long as the movie is damn good

[@wugabriel3465]

Arkhamknight988 that's the spirit

[@mrs.nasirarahman]

Arkhamknight988 yaap🤔😍

[@kantstenchonthemel5641]

noobenstein, It's : "anything like than" actually.

[@kantstenchonthemel5641]

that's just what Don Johson said.

[@kentbarnes6380]

Arkhamknight988 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👏👏👏👏

[@finallyitsed2191]

CGI has gone way beyond anything Thomas Edison ever could have imagined. I know some people think it takes the fun out of movies, but I totally disagree. The effects in movies are constantly getting better (go back and watch Jaws sometime) and that in itself is fantastic. What is also fantastic is that some very creative people have come up with how to do this and much much more. I enjoyed watching this KZbin video just as much as watching the movies themselves, so the fun is definitely still there for me. Smart people make the world go around... even if it's VFX!

[@annafarley9055]

The narrators energy is amazing

[@JosephScarbrough]

I'm not saying that VFX have no place in Hollywood, but I feel like in this modern era of computer technology that a lot of the magic of effects in movies has been lost. In the old days, filmmakers had to figure out ways to make effects work so they'd look believable and convincing, and even if they had a cheap of "Film School 101" quality to them, they still managed to engage audiences into the creative process. With computers, on the other hand, there's somehow an artificial feel to it that takes you out of the experience - especially when it comes to settings: give me the warmth of a painstakingly painted canvas flat outside a window instead of CGI scenery superimposed via greenscreen any day.

[@UnwantedSpirits]

Visual Effects artists are CONSTANTLY trying to figure out more ways to make things look more believable and convincing- that's how we got to our effects today. CGI isn't just a "hit a button and done" type of deal, the techniques used for cg in older movies are not abandoned, they were just translated digitally so that the process can become more accurate and easier to manipulate. There's a lot of study of physics, mathematics, and programming to make art. I mean, things even are still painstakingly painted- digitally. That's how much of the backgrounds, landscapes, and characters are textured and created. We still use miniatures, rigs, armatures, element additions, matte paintings.

[@itsjokeitstier5772]

If you look back at "the old days" they very rarely looked convincing. I mean seriously dude..

[@JosephScarbrough]

Perhaps convincing wasn't the best way to put it, but at least time and effort was put into them back then as opposed to just throwing something together with green screen and CGI. I mean after all, filmmaking and production are visual artforms, it's nice to see the creativity that goes into making them.

[@timgoossens2416]

+Joseph Scarbrough Yeah, because the people that put there heart and soul in the CGI to make it look good aren't creative. There's an incredible amount of work they have to do. Like saying practical effects require more effort is absurd, and almost disrespectful to the people that work months just to make those 3 minutes look amazing. Sad that you can't appreciate that because there's "no creativity in it, and that there's no effort in cgi and greenscreens". Come on dude.

[@HarmonicaMustang]

Tell me about it. During my audio production studies, when we looked into cinematography we briefly touched on production, concentrating 85% of the module on post-production and repair. I understand that it's an important aspect of sound in cinematography (and it's my profession now), but I was taught how to fix audio more than how to record it well in the first place. This is not the best way of going about it. Just like in regular recording studios, due to the fact that we use computers as the capture medium with an infinite amount of undo's and a plethora of tools to repair and reshape poorly captured audio, the art of making a great track is somewhat lost now. When tape was used, it was essential that everyone was in the zone and fully prepared for a take as tape was horrendously expensive (still is). Now this atmosphere is pretty much gone as another take can be made with no consequences in seconds. It was also impossible to do surgical edits simply because you can't see waveform on tape, whereas now you can zoom in and edit a sample that is only a 48000th of a second in length. Of course everything has its benefits and downsides, but making a hit record is no longer an art form that could only be achieved by this strange wizard behind a huge 1970s vintage SSL console, but a kid with a cracked version of FL Studio and a pair of cheap over-the-ear headphones.

[@ScarletPaints]

Civil War: It makes perfect sense to CGI the airport scene considering how much destruction actually went on during that fight. An airport is also a busy place, especially one as big as the one portrayed. How much money do you think they would have had to pay to shoot on location EVEN if they were willing to shut it down for a film shooting? Wolf on Wolfstreet: It may seem like it's not necessary to CGI simple backdrops, but sometimes the directors of the film do not want the locations to be recognizable, or at least TOO recognizable to real life locations. Gravity: As for the props that aren't even there... Not lazy. It would be as if they were calling the prop makers lazy for not building a full size astronauts suit just because they CGed half of it. Godzilla: "There might be some CGI that might surprise you. Like when the military attacks the monster, there's nothing there. Just green screens, a fence and some soldiers." --you're right. I was fully expecting that scene to be shot on location with battleships n the background firing actual missiles at a real Godzilla. Batman v Superman: Contrary to what the video says... I think most people were not surprised that Batmans suit was mostly CGI. I... really wouldn't expect most humans to wear a suit that clunky and move around at all.

[@xKingx16]

....really dude? you seriously think he's really complaining about there not being a real Godzilla there? THAT'S what you zero in on?

[@TheChromaKid]

I wouldn't really say he 'zero(ed) in' on it, considering he wrote a little bit about each film

[@TheChromaKid]

+Amadeus Eisenberg. I've got a question for you, and I'd like you to answer it without swearing or getting angry, if possible. thanks. What difference does it make to you? Say I've got two options for a shot I need. I could go fly across the atlantic to get a couple of shots infront of the statue or liberty to establish a scene is taking place in New york, and then from there on it'll mostly be indoor sets because I'm making the film here in Ireland and once I'm indoors it doesn't really matter as long as it feels like a new york-esque building. Or I could get those few new york exterior shots on a green screen, and ultimately achieve the exact same effect, but be able to produce my film faster, and more efficiently. Both give the same end result, so my question is: Unless doing some via cgi/vfx means actually impedes on the artistic vision and/or is noticeably not real, why does it matter to you? CG is just another tool in the filmmaker's toolkit, and the thing is, every one of those tools, from the dawn of filmmaking, has only been used to fool you in the same way cg is now. Practical effects (e.g. the animatronics in jurassic park) were simply there to fool you enough to suspend the disbelief that there's no live dinosaurs. Before computer set extensions, matte paintings were used (a pane of glass with a new background on it infront of the camera). the list goes on

[@timeless1922]

"Wolf on Wolfstreet:" Fucking dead

[@y0vie]

Wow that's AMAZING 😍❤️

[@janxh01]

2:27 oh my gooood. People have transformed into dinosaurs!!! We are evolving!

[@praveenscreativeworld]

Y they r nude...y they r don't ware paint..

[@bigmofo1122]

"It was just a stuntman." Imagine my shock.

[@OGChelseaB]

I could never be an actor.. I’d be so distracted by all of the props or imaginary props.. I’d probably be laughing the whole time 😂 like “you want me to do what”? “Make love to this teddy bear..? Ooh okay”

[@OGChelseaB]

that takes some good acting.. more props to them 😂

[@krutidanak9181]

Only actor can do this easily But once you start doing acting it becomes easy.

[@KonuFox]

We remember the good old movies with a lot of real actors and very cool decoration and backgrounds. Sometimes we working on small videos like this again. The japanes version of Godzilla was very great, with the modell of citys, cars and ships^^

[@EddieMan117]

*"There's nothing there!"* 😂

[@mugislifestyle5561]

WIth badly scribbled on eyes 😂😂

[@dirkdiggler2430]

Couple years more and believe me actors will either have to find a different career or live theaters will become really popular once again cause Hollywood is going full CGI they won't need actors anymore

[@ZacHawkins42]

Dirk Diggler We can only hope they simply fade into history...

[@maxboissiere4806]

it's costs more to make a human model with correct rigging to put in place as an actor so your fear will probably not ever happen

[@zinekaizerzen-pokemonunite1390]

they'll become voice actors

[@marythomson7931]

Dirk Diggler they barely have to use their minds for acting no wonder so many lives are getting ruined nothing to do but prey on one another in sick degrading ways. So called powerful misfits with money that should be put away in one large jail for their type alone

[@nidohime6233]

Zine Mégathérium Most actors are bad voice actors, they aren't train for do an act where practically nobody can see them.

[@jordan31176]

I love these thumbnails!

[@ranjithja4832]

2:23 the thumbnail

[@YellowMCG]

.

[@K.M.Jadeja.]

@@YellowMCG .

[@sahelamiri2191]

.

[@philjones7303]

No not at all, pause at 2:25

[@TheGrandOracle]

Super heros fighting at an airport with explosions everywhere.... god only knows why it was green screened

[@thefurbeastunderyourbed5012]

Wonder why they had to CGI Leipzig/Halle airport instead of simply requesting a shooting day or two there, not that much traffic they wouldn't have found a slot for the film crew...

[@sanidhyavijay4449]

Because airports are occupied.

[@Navajonkee]

The airport scene is one of the most grandiose scenes in the movie, so 1. I'm sure it was a lot more than one or two days of shooting, considering the actors barely even met, so it was shot on separate occasions. 2. It's an airport, it's not exactly cheap to shoot at an airport, potentially crippling its traffic. 3. Background projecting on a green screen is one of the most basic CGI techniques, meaning it's not only easy to make, but it's also pretty realistic, so no drawback on quality, and it's light on the budget.

[@HJROCKEDITZ]

I AM SUBSCRIBING TO ANYONE WHO SUBSCRIBE BACK MY NOTIFICATION IS ON..

[@StarFyreXXX]

Flight Channel when one airport slows down plane traffic for even an hour it can affect flights worldwide. You would probably need govt approval for that and they would charge a crazy fee. Not worth it. In many cases cgi is cheaper and for materials..cars,.streets etc it's perfect... Many street scenes in the lawyer or business shows etc are cgi cause the hourly fee to shutdown a city street is crazy

[@jahswinonoh5351]

haaaah!!!!!!! I knew the Dinosaurs weren't real

[@dargunsh7156]

They are real

[@helen1924]

Jahswin Onoh ttw

[@helen1924]

&a

[@hamerugumiandthevocaloidfa8654]

Jahswin Onoh of course they aren't, it's a movie.-.

[@yT-oz8uu]

Wow Sherlock.

[@Michael_H_Nielsen]

Well done video. and good narrator :)

[@scoutayodeji695]

Amazing action, keep good work going

[@nyctoym]

I came for the guy acting as the raptors in the thumbnail lol...

[@bldjln3158]

GRAVITY WAS IN 2013? If that’s true Time flys

[@scarletwolfgirl3320]

JEMgaming terraria and more! I know right?

[@goldensun2787]

Agreed

[@hamarbiljungskile8953]

*flies

[@cripaxcreations7789]

JEMgaming terraria and more! iqopwiiisiqii

[@huzaifagill001]

Hollywood movies becomes just because of editing and visual effects!

[@thevarietychannel1017]

2:27 For a second, that sounded like the geico gecko.

[@rozaimahros2429]

Ingen

[@lovelylipbonesouwwwwwwwolv2198]

Lol it did!

[@thevarietychannel1017]

@@lovelylipbonesouwwwwwwwolv2198 Geico. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on car insurance.

[@TPKJoyBoy]

Does an airport need to be CGI'D? UH YES, yes it does. Do you know how complicated it is to film in or around and active airport?

[@Peter_1986]

+THEoWOLF I guarantee that it's at least as hard to record a scene where someone drives a freaking tank through a city, which by the way was done in "GoldenEye", and it was all physical scenery as well. Check out the video "GOLDENEYE Bond Tank Sequence" if you want crystal clear proof of that. In other words - recording a scene at an airport would be no problem at all, they could simply build a model of an airport or use one that is about to close anyway. You make it sound like it is extremely hard and almost impossible just because they didn't do it in this movie, but movie directors can find solutions to almost anything if they actually want to.

[@cristianonaldinho]

It doesn't have to be active

[@italiancat3786]

Also to avoid movie plot leak

[@8o8g91]

And we we're supposed to be suprised that Godzilla couldn't get a whole army fleet of ships to help shoot some scenes lol.

[@8o8g91]

@@cristianonaldinho Do you know of any commercial airports that aren't in use? Yeah, me neither...

[@stampfertnilpfert4485]

Waitwaitwait..... they didnt use actuall military boats that fired real missiles towards a bridge? I totally thought that was real.

[@MH-gr9xm]

Zack Larsson nah....everything is illusion

[@Kara-kq5sb]

Zack Larsson Oh no that was real. I died to it 👌👌👌👌👌👌👌

[@chuks051]

This is Amazing!! Tom Cruise does all his stunts in real life.

[@pepitalacoja3870]

Henry Cavill also does all his stuns in every movie or serie that he works.

[@musekera7828]

it was amaaaaaaaaaaaazing!!!thats why i really love to watch hollywood movies.

[@BanglaXplore]

oooo.... is it this????

[@rrahman2752]

when u come to know that some dummies or fake things have been used instead of a real thing, ultimately your respect for that movie more or less goes down.

[@kirbyhatesincels917]

Rony R. Yes, because they're going to have real dinosaurs.

[@kirbyhatesincels917]

@Maria Don't you mean heartbroken?

[@tsegatefera7287]

It’s better to pretend they are real 😊

[@burcolclone8322]

Not at all. If anything, the VFX guys get my respect for making computer animated images look real

[@ItsJJOLO]

_This is amazing!_

[@skullrose8985]

You don't know what's real & what's not these days. That was intresting to see,great vid thanks.

[@ETeedProductions]

I can't believe how much CGI was in Wolf of Wall Street. I love the movie, but using CGI to just change the backgrounds just seemed like a waste. Would a lot of them really have been that hard to film at locations?

[@lxlcaesarlxl]

Evan Teed Well using cgi saves money. And enhancing the background is different then just a green screen.

[@LostSleepTV]

Yep, insurance costs, travel costs, permits, security, road closures, the costs go up like crazy. And also, the actors' scheduling may not have allowed them to travel.

[@ETeedProductions]

Thats true, you're both right and it does get crazy expensive. Just me personally, and its just my opinion, didn't really see the point in changing the park as seen in the example here. Don't get me wrong, it looks more beautiful afterwards, but didn't seem that bad the way it already was. But also at the same time, as somebody who loves to play with VFX, it blows my mind to see before and after stuff like this! As Scorsese has said himself: "The best editing is when you can't see it" and I really agree with him on that

[@shr6482]

David Fincher is one of the directors who use CGI not because of budget constraint, but to enhance the film quality and viewing experience. U should def check out video essays abt him.

[@ETeedProductions]

Jack III Yup I've seen videos that show how he's done it recently for his Netflix show Mindhunter, pretty amazing stuff. I heard he did it for a lot of Gone Girl as well, I'll definitely have to check out more on that

[@actual.lizard7804]

Doesn’t matter how important the movie is, do you really think it’s possible to use an actual airport as the set?

[@osuushiza8]

Gravity was amazing! It gave me another angular view of science & reality.

[@080rlzomuanpuia2]

-Hey honey, I'll be acting with Chris Pratt in Jurassic World. -Aww, that sounds cool. What's your role? - The Dinosaur ofc...😎

[@elijahjackson1943]

Why the guys naked in the raptors???

[@kaashvigupta3694]

So in the thumbnail the bald guys were naked??

[@largewindypotato4765]

Crafts AT Your Door Y E P

[@AbdullahHayatKhan]

Everything looks so original in these movies

[@orange9911]

Fame Focus: "Did they look completely different?" me: "no I couldn't tell the difference"

[@whoeverwhoever400]

why video games don't look as real as movies?

[@KNHSynths]

because movie CGI is using far more CPU power than the graphic card of your PC even if it"s a big one... And it needs months of work (for a lot of very specialized people) to make a few seconds of good CGI, when in a game your PC just have a few milliseconds to create the next 60 images all alone... Your PC and a movie production are not playing in the same category !

[@groot6780]

Ben Whoever And it takes alot of Money!

[@juliuskona3299]

Ben Whoever if they were as real your computer wouldn't be able to read or render the game because tthe games will require a lot of power and calculations. That is why there are game requirements.

[@ravneetsingh4082]

In Movie CGI when scene is create it will be lock and cannot change, we not recreate that scene in movie and it is fix the images creates by CGI in Movie its only play in Sequence while in video game graphics a games have different possibilities in a single scene means CPU works in very fast speed to create 60 images in millisecond to perform command given to it it means cpu change images again & again

[@WilliamParkerer]

CGI will look the same as video games if they were rendered in real-time on common computers.

[@naufalyoung]

That is why i really love Mission Impossible. Everything are real.

[@vipan1231]

wth

[@hitpuntacanatv8959]

You sure bruh? Everything is real?

[@BagzAndPresident]

Nothing is real dope head

[@msr5519]

@@hitpuntacanatv8959 most of the stunts in mi movies are shot without vfx

[@shortclips1062]

Jacke Chan's movies most of the stunts are really done