Reuploaded to fix mistake I made when I tried to fix a mistake on the log graph that I made when I tried to fix a mistake on the log graph that I tried to fi-
@Haf1zA233m2 ай бұрын
Phy p3 2024 mon GL all. Hopefully its nothing like last years and our p2 ! Relativity in turning points is gonna be the end of me.
@leoyakafudy2 ай бұрын
at least relativity is pretty much just equations, but thinking which one is l0 or t0 or whatever is the bad bit
@TomtheMagician212 ай бұрын
It's also helpful to know for the log graphs, if you go half way up, like you said it being roughly 3 (it's 10^½) and if you go 3/4 of the way up, it's roughly 5.6 (10^¾) Our teacher didn't teach us this at all so for the mocks I just had to use intuition
@TomtheMagician212 ай бұрын
Single handedly saving our exams thank you
@Arcadendo2 ай бұрын
I love you Mr Shorts. Thanks for 2 years of great videos!
@yoohoo13922 ай бұрын
Thank you for your services. It was highly appreciated❤
@noorshah20382 ай бұрын
Thank you for your videos, they've been the best revision source these past two years :)
@flynn52462 ай бұрын
This video is saving my paper 3 thank you
@abidmo7168Ай бұрын
Can you please make compilation videos from the paper walkthroughs for specific topics, e.g All electricity questions from AQA papers 2016-2022 love your work
@khaq4462 ай бұрын
Thanks for all the help sir. Loved the reactions to the stupid aqa a level physics past paper questions really resonated with me.
@subhan83252 ай бұрын
Hi sir, firstly ur a legend I love ur teaching style, secondly do you have a playlist covering year 2 of a level physics for aqa please ?
@AmeyTripathi-dw6cs2 ай бұрын
So grateful for your videos - you saved me in paper 3 today
@shoyo70562 ай бұрын
is it reflected in mark schemes where giving uncertainty to the same value as resolution is the better option than 1/2 resolution?
@ScienceShorts2 ай бұрын
Yes.
@edwardspencer-EDS2 ай бұрын
I am not arguing but in the aqa 2023 paper 1 for the protractor you had to half to get the full 3 marks , I think it’s depends on the situation 🤷♂️
@ScienceShorts2 ай бұрын
They do seem to change their mind a lot, but more often than not, it's a whole. Even if the mark scheme says only one thing, you will get the mark either way. Trust me, I've had several conversations with AQA over the years about this.
@bobvance80172 ай бұрын
@@ScienceShorts So is either one safe to use?
@edwardspencer-EDS2 ай бұрын
Okay 👍
@user-yi8rb1rg8t2 ай бұрын
You're a real hero among men
@freshh322 ай бұрын
Just asking, but I heard that aqa do topics in a 3 year cycle, so I've gathered all the topics that come up for 3a, should I mainly focus on the ones that could come up(drill these topics & be confident) or focus on everything but be weaker at everything
@S1mple-_-2 ай бұрын
What topics do you reckon are coming up?
@freshh322 ай бұрын
@@S1mple-_- g from freefall, emf, and motor effect came up last year, so the other 9 practicals are more likely to come up
@bossgamer94112 ай бұрын
@@freshh32 it wasn't motor effect it was EM induction last year F=BIL wasn't 2023
@AR2K772 ай бұрын
Required Practicals 2, 5, 7 and 10 came up the least out of all the papers so they're perhaps the most likely to come up
@griefwnl76412 ай бұрын
When we use a ruler, even if we line it up and it can’t move , surely there’s still uncertainty in that at both ends?
@ScienceShorts2 ай бұрын
If lining something up with the 0 line, that's not the same thing as judging which line a measurement is closest to.
@sanidufonsekaSL2 ай бұрын
can u pls make videos for edexcel a level bio
@griefwnl76412 ай бұрын
Is the uncertainty half the res for an analogue and just the res for a digital?
@smokey22642 ай бұрын
res for digi and you can use either res or res/2 for analouge both widely accepted
@abida76752 ай бұрын
Why is the uncertainty for a digital equipment equal to its resolution rather than half? I know you said halving it is more justifiable but I want to know how AQA do explain it?
@ScienceShorts2 ай бұрын
Because there is no judgement on your part
@anvion11612 ай бұрын
Because it’s a reading not a measurement
@jedwards44652 ай бұрын
shouldn't the percentage uncertainty at 5:56 for d be 0.5% not 5%?
@ScienceShorts2 ай бұрын
1 is 5% of 20
@MiskoThief2 ай бұрын
i was told by my physics teacher that in physics when coverting into y=mx+c form using logs, you should use the natural log in physics over log base 10, as apparently its what is usually in the mark scheme if they havent told you to do it in log base 10 instead of natural logs, is this true ?
@tectR2 ай бұрын
depends on whether the question (or the graph) is using ln() or log10()
@harrisroberts59382 ай бұрын
Hey is it possible if you can post a video about aqa biology paper 1 that would be great
@marcosseris2 ай бұрын
Why would using analogue equipment ever be better?
@szymlucky2 ай бұрын
I saw this too and i was confused, however, if a digital ammeter only reads values up to 1 decimal place that second decimal place is rounded up or down to fit the 1dp accuracy. This causes inaccuracy. So in an analogue ammeter it wouldnt round any values as your the one reading the value off the ammeter so you can clearly see if the pointer is inbetween any 2 values. Also, i remeber someone mentioning how you can mark with a peice of paper certain reading on the analogue so that u can go back to them and write them down, however with a digital ammeter you cant store values so you might miss and be inaccurate with ur values if ur time interval is small. Hope that kinda made sense, PERSONALLY i would still pick a digital ammeter.
@ScienceShorts2 ай бұрын
For example, when you need to record the time when a measurement reaches a certain value, like when doing capacitor decay. As the needle is constantly moving, you don't have to wait for a number on a screen to change to know you've reached a value.
@marcosseris2 ай бұрын
@@ScienceShorts thank you 👍👍
@mieispeeking2 ай бұрын
I thought parallax error is a systematic error? Why is this case it's a random error???
@ScienceShorts2 ай бұрын
How can you get the same parallax error every time?!
@eisaahmad74532 ай бұрын
@@ScienceShortsyou constantly look at reading above or below