All Titanic Sinking Theories (+my own) • FlipaClip

[@theaircrafter9712]

Time Skip One-piece Theory: 0:00 1985 Theory: 0:08 1995 Theory: 0:15 Parks Stephenson Theory: 0:24 V-Break Theory: 0:33 Roy Mengot Theory: 0:41 Aaron1912 V-Break Theory: 0:50 James Cameron Theory: 1:00 TornadoHarry Theory: 1:08 Kapitan Creeper Theory: 1:17 That’s all folks, hope this saves lives lol

[@theaircrafter9712]

Thank’s for te pin man

[@sum_dog7391]

We need more of these people on yt🥰

[@theaircrafter9712]

Thats what she said

[@Cybersaurus5783]

The one piece is real🤩

[@ricecake3544]

​@@Cybersaurus5783can we get much higher

[@LondonEmergency999]

As you may have noticed, the ship sank.

[@sevinbridges3547]

Bruh 😒😐

[@tencents6]

BRUH!!! YOU JUST BLEW MY MIND!!!!

[@pluviosaurus05]

I didn’t see that, thanks for pointing it out

[@FireyFireFlame]

why is this just now getting comments a year later AND IM ONE OF THEM

[@ericcartman65378]

​@@FireyFireFlame yuh why

[@theduke7539]

Honestly I'd say James Cameron is the veritable authority on the titanic, his movie may have been a mild dramatization, his books and research are extremely detailed. And he argued with the Mythbusters that while rose and Jack could have both survived on the door if they tied their vests to it and were very careful, but his argument was that doing so not only was never done during the actualy sinking by any of the 6 survivors in the water, but also it would undermine the level of desperation and panic all the swimmers were experiencing. That kind of slow rational thought just didn't place in their minds because adrenaline is the enemy of creativity.

[@wantedwario2621]

James Cameron is a Titanic historian?

[@connorpusey5912]

I’d say the most accurate theory is the one presented in the book “On a Sea of Glass”. It was written by _true_ Titanic historians and has become the be-all end-all of Titanic literature.

[@mikkel066h]

I am taking cold showers daily, and first time I did it my body wanted to do anything to get out. Gasping for air when the ice cold water went over my head, my arms seems to want to find something to grab on to and me having to will myself to stand and accept the suck for a minute. Can’t imagine what below zero water does to you in pitch black darkness with people screaming around you.

[@buddyrevelle736]

He raised the bar and rid the world of Honey Boo Boo 🎶 His name is James, James Cameron, The bravest pioneer. No budget too steep, no sea too deep, Who's That? It's him, James Cameron.

[@ЕвгенийТрунов-ж1я]

Задача James Cameron’s показать экшен. Поэтому он сильно преувеличивал масштаб разрушения, и приукрасил процесс разрушения!

[@af_1877]

Your theory is a little true beacuse you had the 2nd funnel going down in the crack of the ship but that funnel caught on fire when it was the final plunge. So yeah a saviour said that

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

uhhh i was not focusing at the funnel falls at all i focused on the break itself

[@Gxhbro]

I see

[@joshuayoung8605]

Yours is cool but the bad quality is mainly the many pieces that break off , normally that wouldn’t happen , otherwise great

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

@@joshuayoung8605 ok thx

[@49ersprodigy]

@@Kapitan_Creeper why did the whole part of the ship go to peices?

[@aquaticproducts4274]

The one piece was unlikely for a few reasons,one being that the ship split in half(it was found like that) and I would say the v break is also unlikely because if it were to happen,both the stern and the bow would be more destroyed than they are now

[@aquaticproducts4274]

And the way the wreck is,the evidence points directly to how the titanic couldn’t of sank for both ways,seeing that it could’ve sank straight up and then split,and the stern raised up and it went under the sea

[@kleo5696]

but then again, the one piece theory could happen if they were to be split in half when they crashed into the underground sea.

[@theduke7539]

@@kleo5696 doing so would have left the stern very close to the bow, the stern is almost 2000 feet, meaning the broke apart either at the surface or just below it, and at the surface makes the most sense because during the free fall there wouldn't have been any forces trying to pull them apart, also when they bow and stern separate at the ocean flow, the stern is almost always infront of the bow like with the Edmund Fitzgerald. This comes from the bow slamming into the ground and the stern essentially ripping itself forward under inertia.

[@kleo5696]

@@theduke7539 i did not understand what you just typed but atleast i learnt that the onepiece theory isn't realistic

[@aquaticproducts4274]

@@kleo5696 but it couldn’t of happened because the stern is 600 miles away from the bow

[@infernalone666]

Also remember that the one-piece theory was held as the official way until the wreck was found and the survivors who said the ship broke apart were rebuked until then. So the titanic had to break apart in a way where it wasn't noticable to most of the survivors on a dark night, which should omit any overly-"overt" theories.

[@zachbraxton1997]

Well that rules out James Camerons movie completely lol

[@blazoraptor3392]

The titanic was just a dark silhouette against the pitch-black nightsky miles away. People who believed it sunk in one piece mistook the break-up sounds as the ship's boilers exploding. It's clear that no matter the way it broke up, half of the survivors would say it sunk in one piece.

[@Hue_Sam]

the night sky was so dark that they can’t even see the ship at all when it blacked out.

[@zachbraxton1997]

@@Hue_Sam they could see it, your eyes adjust to the dark and they were out there for 2 hours watching it. Don't forget to take moonlight into consideration as well.

[@blazoraptor3392]

@@zachbraxton1997 there was no moon that night. The only light sources were the stars.

[@Adra_darkness]

I really like the theories about how it sank and urs aswell. I'm not a fan of the v-break tho. However it sank, must be frightening for those who were on the boat to see the ship going down and around 1500 people die.

[@beaudavis3808]

The only theory that we do know, with 100% certainty, that is not true is the one piece theory. That one was busted the moment Robert Ballard discovered the Titanic and saw her in 2 massive pieces.

[@SuperGamefreak18]

The first v break for how it was inaccurate atleast looks like how someone could confuse the shearing

[@mapleflag6518]

@@beaudavis3808 THE ONE PIECE IS REAL!!

[@CaptainMav1735]

@@mapleflag6518 bro its not look at the wreck

[@mapleflag6518]

@@CaptainMav1735 You really didn’t get the joke did you?

[@agent_pilot6723]

I’m pretty sure the 1995 theory is the one almost everyone follows + the one on the movie. The older and newer versions are a little convincing too tho

[@dylan_daugherty_]

JC’s 2012 theory is the modern one accepted by the Titanic Community, the 1995 theory suffers in that the ship would be unable to reach a list that high before snapping due to pressure

[@GamePlayerZ1912]

@@dylan_daugherty_ not really, the accepted one currently is from the On a Sea of Glass animation on KZbin, released in May 2021.

[@2fastGEO]

i like roy mengot 2008

[@englishatheart]

Though*

[@maritimefacts7454]

In my opinion this video would be a good video for a person who is just learning about titanic, not too detailed but not too vague either. I think this would absolutely be a good starter into studying titanic and it’s history/disaster! Keep up the good work!

[@purnamaalfendi1664]

Ada data bang menikah terus ... Tidak mau baik hahahah ada baik ...

[@dlifedt]

“Not too detailed” - I think you and I have very different meaning of what “just learning about titanic” is 😂😂

[@Corxed]

To be honest, I really like your theory. After all, not all survivors reported seeing the ship break in two, so it had to be subtle enough that most wouldn't notice it, and yours also explains what happened to the middle section of the ship, which is still missing to this day. Very nice.

[@stephaniefox896]

It has come out that people lied about the the ship not going down like Mr. Ismay and he lied about wanting the Boilers all turned on to. He wanted to make headlines and he did. It even came out that people where paid to lie about how the ship went down.

[@Corxed]

@@stephaniefox896 That's pretty interesting and at the same time I believe it 100% people will try to make money even if it means shamefully lying about how 1500 people died.

[@stephaniefox896]

@@Corxed it had to do something about the inquiry that happened after the ship went down Mr Ismay was under investigation and they where wanting to see what happened but he was a coward and lied

[@haswell1476]

Of course no one saw it break in two. It was dark as hell in the middle of the ocean with no moon. when the lights went out on the ship I doubt anyone could see the ship anymore, no matter how close or far.

[@GoldballIndustries]

It's possible the mid-ship went down with the stern and was destroyed when it impacted the seafloor

[@jakubchloe]

0:32 what kind of broken roblox glitch is this

[@EvanTheHistorian]

1985 people: "ok so the titanic split in half then turned into egg while it sank"

[@EvanTheHistorian]

i hope people get what i ment lmao

[@ThatIsALakeSir]

That was like the first theory ever, i think they made it disintegrate because of the debris field i understand what you mean tho lol

[@wyster14]

Like, the wreck even shows that the break was rather messy due to it occurring in heavily reinforced parts of the ship, so the theory with two superstructure towers makes a lot of sense

[@zulazhar2552]

TITANC

[@professionalidiot2767]

That’s actually really clever. Even if this isn’t the true story, these theories could pretty much all be true (except for the one piece theory). Amazing job on the animation as well.

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Thx!

[@steamshiphistory8469]

all the reports say it broke when sticking straight up as we know it and then when it snapped the stern rolled over on its side then got pulled straight up and sank

[@RobertPSmith336]

No v break though.

[@steamshiphistory8469]

@@RobertPSmith336 yea that’s a myth

[@IreneWY]

V break is also impossible

[@agent_pilot6723]

Although, your theory is more of a hypothesis than a theory, it’s decently supported. Nice video

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Thx

[@munastronaut8147]

@iamdipseh hypothesis is something that cannot be proved yet, and a theory is something that might be proved by an action

[@米空軍パイロット]

@Walter IV Only to a layman

[@ForzaMonkey]

@munastronaut you messed up your definitions a little bit a theory explains WHY something happens (explains a scientific law, which is WHAT happens) a hypothesis is an educated guess on what the result of an experiment will be.

[@TornadoHarry]

You included mine! Thank you!

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Youre welcome :)

[@viperfishlover8767]

fun fact: theres a whole video disproving aaron1912s vbreak theory

[@aladinelb1047]

"even the god can't sink it" God : OK *spawn ice berg*

[@HenryMatthew2]

Bright side just stole the thumbnail…

[@Pilfered_]

I'ma be real, I have een studying the titanic for 2 years now. Everything really leads to James Cameron's way scientifically.

[@pro_expertttytipad3700]

I've been doing that since 2018

[@nickbell4984]

@Evty that's what you read on Facebook

[@ThatIsALakeSir]

@@nickbell4984 “that’s what you read on facebook” that’s what you said here

[@loveones9047]

James Cameron’s theory could also be right. You see, The titanics stern did last a bit before it sank because it took a while for the water to flood the lower decks of the stern

[@frasermcgeough]

The 2nd last one or the James Cameron ones were the best and probably most accurate

[@TornadoHarry]

Thanks!

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

@@TornadoHarry yeah i believe in your theory the most after mine tbh

[@JiuJitsuM4]

Is it easy to assume that Aaron1912 has the worst theory among Titanic fans? I’m new to this scene, but I keep hearing how people generally don’t like him.

[@mapleflag6518]

The dude is like a flat earther.

[@RASCAL.]

0:12 Stern: what a Nice day to sleep

[@ailopeformers8669]

I like James Cameron and yours, but roy mengot version might be accurate.

[@BestEachDay]

And now, want to know how it really happened? Too bad. Time machines don't exist and bright underwater lights and camera's didn't exist in 1912. We'll just never really know.

[@jBread28]

THE ONE PIECE! THE ONE PIECE IS REAL!

[@v_munu]

I appreciate that you included Aaron1912's psychotic theory lmfao

[@ultravibez3170]

We need to erase all of Aaron1912's theories because it literally makes no sense on how the ship performed a V-break

[@LyricalXilence]

I actually think the Aaron1912 V break looks better than the first V break. I still can't figure out why it would rip from top to bottom rather than bottom to top ...but ok.

[@FIREIKTRONOMIA.]

I believe in the 1995 theory. V-break theory in my opinion is not even possible in any way. Thats just my opinion so i hope nobody dosent get mad

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Yeah i believe in 1995 too and also TornadoHarry's Theory is also pretty realistic and yeah V break is strange but with low chances COULD be possible

[@FIREIKTRONOMIA.]

@@Kapitan_Creeper the theory is very weird for me. As a ship nerd being almost 6 years i believe only the james camerons and 1995 theorys. And the v-break is a new thing what i heard and its so strange for me. YES it can be true in 5% chance but yeah i think its just false theory

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

@@FIREIKTRONOMIA. for me too

[@GamePlayerZ1912]

Just to note, by today's research and knowledge, the 1995/1997 theory is heavily inaccurate. It is also overly dramatic because of being for a movie, like the exaggerated 45 degree angle before the break which is not even possible because if the bow of the ship took a angle higher than 35 degrees, the boilers would slide, but they remain firmly on their seats in the wreck.

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

@@GamePlayerZ1912 aaaand whats the Problem with that? I put todays versions too and the 1995.

[@petergriffin383]

Excellent job on these, I think it's a combination... I do believe the James Cameron one is accurate, the sturn would've hinged on the double bottom hull. Ohhhh boy, what I would give to have witnesso this event as terrible as it was.

[@i-cant-think-of-a-handle-guys]

Stern*

[@MaxLovesNascarOfficial]

I believe in the James Cameron.

[@ussenterprisecvn-8098]

And the world will never know how the Titanic truly sunk

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Yeeeesssssss

[@daniko4447]

i'm sure all of them are dead, and i don't think it would be a great idea

[@panzerscoutempire27]

@@daniko4447 Well James Cameron’s Version from 2012 actually includes many factors into account, so it’s most likely the Titanic sank like shown in that animation

[@yallneedtogetintoityuh3038]

@Randy the last survivor of the titanic died a few years back. she was a newborn during the sinking, so she wouldnt know regardless.

[@luizclaudioaltenburg3761]

@Randy and it was very dark the moment the Titanic sank. The survivors couldn't see almost nothing.

[@nuclearpowerphysics5409]

During the v break some how the ship moved up like Godzilla was doing bench presses under it.

[@kerotomas1]

The V break version where the ship's bow rises up during the break is physically impossible since the stern was mostly watertight at this point and the bow-mid section was completely filled up with water it was simply too heavy for that stern to make it rise up.

[@GodzillaKingofthemonsterverse]

So were talking about me now

[@vibrantgleam]

@@kerotomas1 Exactly

[@tylergagnon1613]

I always theorized that it broke in half under/near under the water from the 3rd funnel. Even though the boats were further out there is no way so many people would have not seen it break like it did in Cameron’s movie. There were also survivors like Jack Thayer and Lightoller who were close to the ship, but didn’t see the break. Lightoller said She went down in one piece, while Thayer claimed he did see the ship buckle but not break. The break happening below/ near below the water would have given the illusion that the ship went down in one piece.

[@Eza_yuta]

Yeah I suspect this too. How come the ship broke above the water yet almost everyone survived saw it sunk one whole. It's must be broke on their way under the water.

[@GamePlayerZ1912]

​@@Eza_yuta I suppose you are misinformed. Several eyewitnesses recall seeing Titanic break apart, though they were contradictory about details. Here are some of them: • Thomas Ranger: "The forward end of the ship went underneath and seemed to break off, and the afterpart came back on a level keel" • Emily Ryerson: "She seemed to break in half as if cut with a knife, and as the bow went under the lights went out" • Frederick Barrett: "Then she broke in half, the weight of the half out of the water being too great a strain, I suppose" • Joseph Scarrot: "The ship was right up on end then. Suddently she broke in two between the third and fourth funnel" • Charlotte Collyer: "Two other explosions followed dull and heavy, as if below the surface. The Titanic broke into two before my eyes" • Jack Thayer: "Suddenly the whole superstructure of the ship appeared to split, well forward to midship, and blow or buckle upwards" There are many more. I'd recommend visiting Paul Lee's website, he has a collection of survivor accounts to read.

[@Zypher-y3e]

THE ONE PIECE IS REAL !

[@goldentitan100]

Maybe it’s all of them just in other parallel universes…

[@vibrantgleam]

LMAO.

[@norranradd4357]

Your theory is very close to the one presented in the book “On a Sea of Glass”. This theory has the Titanic break into two big parts but also two other smaller parts in which the superstructure failed. After looking into this theory and hearing the evidence I support it, I also believe the double hull theory. V breaks are impossible and Aaron1912’s theory is practically and physically impossible.

[@ForsakenSandpaper]

One piece...

[@Real_Chipppy]

Dang you gotta love the 2012 titanic movie by Robert Ballard☠️

[@AaronBoat1]

Your theory is mine too

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Lol epic

[@Reichpospolita420]

*o u r*

[@AaronBoat1]

@@Reichpospolita420 communism intensifies

[@Reichpospolita420]

@@AaronBoat1 soviet anthem plays

[@Radidsh]

Thank you for the fascinating video! Simple and straight to the point. I had no idea there were this many theories regarding the sinking of the ship, and I was surprised to see that in 1912, the main theory was that the ship sank as a whole, though that surprise might just be due to me being "used to" the 1995 theory, and there may not be a whole not of data to go by yet at the year of the disaster. Have a nice day.

[@alysonk5853]

The 2012 Cameron’s theory seems most accurate to me.

[@GamePlayerZ1912]

Not all theories, but nice job I guess. However an explanation for your theory could be nice, from just looking at an quick animation, it's hard to know what caused everything.

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Yes, im planning to do a full explanation of my theory!

[@1Woofer1]

0:53 can everyone please stop giving him attention. i don't want more victims falling into his cult

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

I mean whats wrong? Everyone is allowed to have opinions!

[@1Woofer1]

@@Kapitan_Creeper I agree. there's a difference between having an opinion, and willingly spreading false information that's not based on reality or the laws of physics. Aaron1912 is basically the flat earth society of the Titanic community

[@vibrantgleam]

@@1Woofer1 We don't talk about Aaron1912, no, no, no, no.

[@Infectedwatermeloncat]

@@vibrantgleam hey it was a Nice Day

[@vibrantgleam]

@@Infectedwatermeloncat WHA

[@mikemars5984]

The officer Lightoller stated he saw the stern of the ship go perpendicular at the last moment. He was there and saw it close range. One presumes he is a most reliable witness to what happened above the water.

[@IPlayWithFire135]

It cracked on the surface, but went down in one mangled piece. That’s why there were conflicting accounts. The bow dragged the still partly connected and not fully flooded stern down to the depths, until they separated somewhere in the water column. Water resistance on open damage on the way down and pressure implosion account for the greater damage to the stern.

[@Vert_s]

honestly this seems like the most convincing theory, would also explain the missing pieces that could've blown away on account of the implosion

[@Eza_yuta]

Yeah I am agree. This theory of broke into two under the water is most logical yet under rated and under search.

[@misterkaos.357]

That's how I always imagined it went down.

[@cukmanyoo9070]

but the survivor told that the titanic literally breaks on the surface. but the people doesn't believe them

[@cukmanyoo9070]

who knows maybe it breaks on the surface area, but that doesn't relate on the survivor statement.

[@physicsisfuns9666]

I saw the second one but there is a mistake you just turn the one piece of the titanic into a rocket

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

?

[@Mtscountry]

To improve your theory, I tell you that the fourth funnel fell to the water level, due to the testimony of officer Lightoller, who saw from a distance the fourth funnel fall.

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

My theory is MY theory!

[@crisstudiosextra9061]

Xd

[@tigerproducts6905]

@@Kapitan_Creeper damn bro

[@Mtscountry]

@@Kapitan_Creeper sorry

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

@@Mtscountry its fine

[@the_rover1]

wtf was going on with that 2006 v-break split? 0:35 down. no, up! wait, no, down it goes. well...up again. and down. updown. 😂

[@kermitthemutantlevitatingf7836]

Phisyks

[@pro_expertttytipad3700]

I dont know which one 1985 is, but the front mast is supposed to fall when the bow is underwater, bouncing around on the bridge and ripping the bridge off.

[@ThatIsALakeSir]

That was the return to titanic one, the 1985 is the theory ballard made when they first discovered the titanic

[@kommandantgalileo]

V Break is literally impossible.

[@julien9460]

The One Pieeeeeeeece! The One Piece is reeeeeal!! 🤯🤯

[@moisescalvo1692]

I’d say there’s too much overthinking about Titanic’s sinking. All of these theories (except the one piece sinking) are basically the same but with little differences. No one (even the survivors) are sure about how it happened in detail. The only fact that matters is that it split in two pieces. PD: James Cameron version seems to be the closest one

[@hs07_08]

You version of break titanic it's great

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Thx

[@hs07_08]

@@Kapitan_Creeper I like your channel

[@hs07_08]

@@Kapitan_Creeper you can download Discord please

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

@@hs07_08 i already have discord

[@hs07_08]

@@Kapitan_Creeper I'm for Chile of Latino America

[@Titanic_legend]

Давно хотел посмотреть все версии гибели Титаника, спасибо :)

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Незачто :)

[@TY113.]

I lay awake at night at Aron’s v break

[@emanuel82]

I think we can exclude the one-piece theory. I think James Camerons sinkingtheory is the most accurate.

[@mrtea1]

Мне больше кажется 1985, Roy Mengot и твой. Я больше верю в ту версию где разлом между 2 и 3 трубой. 🤔

[@Turtlesaregoo]

If you didn’t know bright side stole your entire video

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Yeah ive seen that, the people from brightside are idiots :/

[@Brandt_thee_sith]

The fact he did on FlipaClip great job

[@justaweeb9086]

My theory is that the ship sank after hitting an iceberg

[@ezekielalimpia3048]

Its kinda interesting thinking about these theories.

[@jonathantuttle9181]

Why are they so much theories I mean there where hundreds of people who watched it. Or did I miss something?

[@planevideos001]

ShinGoji theory is also possible

[@GageisGreat12]

All I know is that if the time machine is invented, someone is gonna be disappointed.

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

ok

[@The_Lost_And_Forgotten2009]

ik

[@terraspace1100]

@@The_Lost_And_Forgotten2009 can

[@LyricalXilence]

1912 was in A Night To Remember and 1995 was in Titanic? Did the Titanic 1996 miniseries show it as 1985 or 1995? And I didn't know James Cameron wrote books about Titanic, I've got to see those. As for his 2012 theory it looks almost identical to 1995. Does anyone have any ideas about the 2005 theory? Why did this person think it broke in 4 sections? The V Break looks ridiculous imo, and I don't think the bow being full of water could have been pulled back towards the surface by the lighter stern. The 1912 V break has more possibility.

[@prorandocopier7945]

THE ONE PIECE!!! THE ONE PIECE IS REALL!!!11!11

[@daviddermaurer8503]

Shut up.

[@АнђељкоМилошевић]

There is also one that is sunk down deep and then broke, that is from national geography.

[@usswasp6530]

my version: *bends" *stress" *crack" *a deck holding" *detach" *you died" (titanic bow part looked bent hard)

[@tinocos1016]

Or we can take that survivors account. They saw the ship break over the water. Most this these show the break under water.

[@thegoofyyy]

watch the movie titanic at the start is shows rose as an old woman watching how it sunk

[@rafiqstarline]

But thats not how it sank Movie wrong

[@gamingxd3448]

That’s a movie

[@mrbangg4487]

Your theory is good i think that fits well but maybe just add more sense like the stern stop moving while the front of the shio is sinking or like idk

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Yeah i had strangely made a small ,,stop" there accidentaly while animating, but it really wasnt supposed to happen

[@dasein5170]

0:08 That's not 1985 thats 1987

[@Cappy_real]

The one piece theory wasnt created in 1912. Infact, people already knew the ship broke in half

[@majlordag1889]

No, there were mixed reports of both people saying it broke and people saying it didn't. They didn't find the wreck until much later so they couldn't have known. It might be realistic to have both versions 1912 though

[@power_0007]

Im not a fan of yours. Let me explain. Okay lets cut your boar into segments. 1,2 and 3. When it was sinking you only focused on 3. 1,2 were uncomfortably frozen at the top. Then after 3 sinked you sinked 2. 1 still frozen. Then you sink 1. Though keep it up. You do better than me.

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Thx and yeah i agree my theory is horribly animated and im planning on reanimating it and analyzing/explaining it

[@jaredliebman4529]

My theory is it starts to flow all 6 compartments after the water reaches the first funnel the funnel falls down then it splits into 2 the second funnel falls down then 20 mins more the next funnel falls down and then the next funnel falls down then its the final plunge after that the lifeboat are just sailing for like 10-20 mins then the Carpathia comes.

[@ultralaggerREV1]

Fun fact: modern luxury cruise ships DWARF the Titanic-class ships

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Is that really big news? And its Olympic-Class

[@ultralaggerREV1]

@@Kapitan_Creeper olympic, sorry.

[@BeatWasTaken]

It doesn't matter how it broke it's in the past it doesn't matter

[@marcintomaszczyk7638]

Why they just didn’t ask survivors “how did it look like”?

[@userrr140]

They asked. Their statements were influential in shaping these theories.

[@bronzefanpage8256]

I think the front started sinking, the hull broke but the bottom was still attached (some other people think so too), the bottom which was still attached pulled the back part up vertical while the front went under, then it broke completely and the front sank, not long after the back too.

[@ЕвгенийТрунов-ж1я]

Абсолютно близкая к истине теория. Единственное, разлучились эти две части всё таки глубоко под водой.

[@cheese-dh6bc]

The double bottom failed first

[@kongphopapiratmontree8209]

Yall arguing in the comments chill its just a animation 💀

[@collincoolisGOATED]

Your theory is inaccurate bc the ships didn’t split into 3 purview bc the piece can’t just smash apart. Was a good try though

[@rafiqstarline]

You are wrong Have you look at Historians?

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

@Collin Cool well this is just my own theory how it COULD be, its not meant to be 100% ,,accurate"

[@Quantum0388]

0:00 THE ONE PIECE IS REAL

[@HistoryBuffness]

I remember hearing a survivor story that makes me think the v-break has more validity.

[@steamshiphistory8469]

you may not know it the survivor who said about the v break later said that it didn’t break like that he originally thought it did he said it broke the way we know it

[@HistoryBuffness]

@@steamshiphistory8469 ah fair, but the survivor im thinking of was a woman and her daughter said something similar to her mothers account except that she didnt see the break bc her mom covered her eyes for a while in the lifeboat.

[@IStoleUrWille]

It’s crazy how it’s been 110 years and that they Sink🎉

[@lily_kay]

This is some nice animation

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Thanks :)

[@xanderdownunder1995]

at least your version is better than Aarons

[@masterofgru5657]

I really like this animation, very detailed while still being easy to understand. great work my friend!!

[@Michaelthehoney]

i only agree with James Camron

[@Purple_Ninja]

How did you get that effect of the ship being able to been seen under water? Also i agree with all 1995+ theories, nice animation! 👍

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

i made this animation in flipaclip, and there you can set the visibility of a layer from 0% to 100%, so i set it on roughly 50%

[@Purple_Ninja]

Thanks 😊

[@maxbjork7804]

My theory is pretty much the same as cameron’s execpt this time the dubble keel hang on rips out a Huge peice of the stern Pulling it down then everything above the hole collapses in the implosion givning us the wreck we have today

[@sneezicat2055]

cool animation!

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

thx

[@RobertPSmith336]

I feel like people try to explain the amount of disappearance on the stern from the break. When is reality as the stern sunk to the floor it was shredded apart because of the way it went down. The bow how ever did not go down the same as the stern. Also over the past 100 years the stern has sat on the ocean floor it most likely was eaten away by rust and pressure.

[@sindylowry82]

The stern broke apart due to an implosion because of all the air trying to escape the stern.

[@RobertPSmith336]

@@sindylowry82 partly yeah, but it was already underwater almost half a mile.

[@cheese-dh6bc]

Steel doesn't come apart, so no no implosion happend

[@crazyeddie1981]

@@cheese-dh6bc so are u saying that every ship or sub that imploded bc of trapped are and ripped itself apart is false

[@RobertPSmith336]

@@crazyeddie1981 No what im saying is that because of the way the stern when down after the implosion it was shredded apart and after long years of bacterial corrosion. It is backed up by this because of where parts of the wreckage are.

[@PelsckoPolesko]

I think Bright Side stole your thumbnail, and made some changes Edit: just checked, they def took it.

[@toptencool368]

animating is hard, this deserves a like.

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Thanks!

[@descontextualizando1955]

Why is James Cameron 2012 and not 1997?

[@descontextualizando1955]

@Austin Engel Thanks. I did not knew about this documentary kkkk

[@Gxhbro]

Was scrolling down my recommendations when i found this masterpiece

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

Thanks :)

[@Gxhbro]

Its really entertaining to watch ngl

[@Gxhbro]

Never thought i would come back to ocean liners

[@insertnamehere313]

Is Aaron in the comments because if he is NOBODY IS RIGHT REGARDLESS AND IT'S HIS THEORIES OR YOUR WRONG. I thought your animated video is very instructive and your right it's just to give you a visual of what different break up theories could look like so PEOPLE QUIT AS YOU GUY'S LEAVING STUPID COMMENTS IS EVIDENCE YOUR PARENTS TAUGHT YOU ENTITLEMENT AND YOU EXPECT PERFECTION BUT LIFE ISN'T PERFECT AND NEITHER ARE YOU. I DON'T SEE ANY OF YOUR SIMULATIONS ON KZbin SO DON'T HATE ON PEOPLE WHO TRY TO INFORM YOU AS THIS MAN DOES, YOU COULDN'T DO BETTER WITH A TECH CREW SO STOP HATING THE CREATOR JUST TO BULLY AND GET LIKES ON YOUR COMMENT. Keep up the good work Kapitin Creeper and don't pay attention to keyboard Titanic expert's in the comments 🤣👍🤙☝️

[@adi-342]

mistake: the double hull was still attached and that pulls the stern up. And then the double hull detached

[@Kapitan_Creeper]

I literally included that thing... -_-

[@adi-342]

Where