Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregates | Fineness Modulus of Fine Aggregates | Particle Size Distribution

Complete procedure of sieve analysis of Fine Aggregates have been discussed in detail, fineness modulus has been explained in detail, sieve analysis is also known as particle size distribution or Grading analysis.
Test is performed according to IS 383, the standard sieve set is as follows from top to bottom, 4.75mm, 2.36mm, 1.18mm, 600 micron, 300 micron, 150 micron and Pan.
1KG of Fine Aggregates is taken and Sample is tested 3 times and the average weight is taken and than percentage retained, cumulative percentage retained and percentage passing is calculated, fineness modulus is also calculated as that number will differentiate the sample between fine sand or medium sand or coarse sand and also explained how to interpret the fineness modulus number.
#sieveanalysis #testonaggregates #fineaggregates

[@fredfred2700]

Thank you so much sir You've done justice with your explanation

[@pasupureddikavya1656]

Thank u sir .. u r explanation is excellent sir ..u r way of talking is too good ...

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

So nice of you, keep watching and supporting

[@CVBMohammadAsad]

It was a very very useful video to me, Thank you sir for giving such a nice explanation

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Thank you, keep watching, all the best

[@jeanboscohabiyaremye8341]

I'm very interesting to follow all what you do on this chanel and I would like to beg whether possible to show us some important or application of what you test in civil engineering work or how it can be used as a tool in other calculation. Thank u engineer

[@nassiwasauda8311]

Your video is Soo sweet, thanks v. Much

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

So nice of you, keep watching and sharing, all the best

[@SMworld2511]

Very well explained

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Thank you for watching, all the best

[@moni8407]

Excellent demo....👍👍👍

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Thank you! 👍 all the best, keep watching and sharing

[@kamalajat2338]

It’s very informative and understandable

[@venkateshmurthymurthy308]

Tq for excellent explanation sir

[@talkwithshubhampathak]

Thank you 🙏🏿

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Welcome, keep watching, all the best

[@kuruvaharikrishna2386]

Tq u sir gave me kind Information ❤

[@exotic_officials8849]

Thanks sir this is very helpful for us

[@nagupatil9380]

Thank u sir . Nice explanation

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Most welcome, keep supporting

[@amitkumaryadav5737]

Very nice sir nice to meet you

[@tejain6687]

Very good sir

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Thank you, keep sharing, all the best

[@sujisKitchen2020]

informative and useful vedio 👌 thanks 🙏

[@siripalli140]

Excellent explanation

[@sahanakmsahanakm7487]

Thank you sir nice explanation

[@pavannayak369]

Thank you sir 🎉

[@kawsarmufeen634]

Excellent sir 👍

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

So nice of you, all the best, keep watching

[@avinashtiwari3513]

Very helpful

[@mallikarjunyankanchi5037]

Super sir🎉

[@musfiqueordinaryfact6356]

Thank you

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Welcome, Keep supporting us

[@musfiqueordinaryfact6356]

All About Structural Analysis and Design yeah always

[@malaybiswas8490]

Sir it was nice explaination but at the time of fineness modulus, summation of %age retained is 310.93 not 211.65.... plz correct me

[@amr_of_lagos]

Don't add the value of the pan

[@aadeshsolanki1375]

Sir excellent explain bs sir thoda hindi bhi use kre plz

[@siripalli140]

Thank you sir

[@TeeTee-ox6kw]

Thank you sir, clear explanation and well understood

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

You are welcome, thank you so much, all the best

[@trilokziddyyadav2792]

Mast video h sir...

[@meghan7240]

what if the FM value is less than 2 ? Can we use such an aggregate for plastiring work ? In the last interpretation, u said it is between 600 micron & 300 micron..but its only 2.11 and should be between 300 micron & 150 micron

[@vibermedia7134]

Thankhu. M

[@kukudupala]

Sum of Cumulative Retained is 310.66 but you wrote 211.65 how is it????

[@emilyfan8894]

It will be more convenient to use if screening equipment is used

[@user-vx5vp7ig4t]

tq

[@user-nt6uh5qf8p]

the calculate methed of fineness modulus is very old,has been phased out.I calclated it was 2.07

[@adityakumarroyal7138]

sir query 1 - which zone fine aggregate used for for what kind of work either for construction work or for plastering work a fine aggregate (or fine/medium/coarse sand) will used. is there any kind of prescribed differentiation mention that if uor result lies in zone-3 then yhis fine aggregate will used in concreting / platsering i mean how can one differentiate? query no 2- what about coarse aggregate sieve analysis. why we do it is there any kind of reason belongs to strentgth if one cant do these analysis. quest no 3- how can i decide the sample amount teachers create so much confusion for the sample to be taken of fine aggregate(here).

[@swamyrajuyadav5407]

Sir tell me about difference between Bulk density, PSD & sieve analysis

[@samduplachungpa8923]

Sir in gopal ranjan book it is written that sieves required for fine sieve analysis is 4.75 mm, 2 mm 1 mm, 600 micron, 425 micron, 212 micron, 150 micron and 65 micron . But when we do it according to IS 383 sirve size is different. Why is that?

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Kindly follow IS Codal Provisions

[@kamleshdce]

ppp

[@sherlasaikumar5353]

Then what about 0.075micron sieve

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

If you go through IS 2386 and IS 383, they have not mentioned 75 micron sieve so i have not taken in this video, if you take and do nothing wrong, most of the colleges take 75 micron sieve and do, as code has not mentioned so i have not taken 75 Micron sieve

[@fredfred2700]

Pls can you shed more light on the micron region where majority of the sand lies due to the finest modulus?

[@trishasackey226]

Hello, I have a question concerning the FM of 2.11 and how you determine where it lies in the sieve size. How do we know that it fits between 300 micron and 600 micron? How does 2.11 tell us the sieve size?

[@neekeshpradhan8957]

Yeah my question too. How was it determined? Guess he ended up creating greater confusion than actually resovling one.

[@gsreegh]

Description and calculations here...please check out www.transcalc.com/finenessmoduluscalc1trace

[@nukleerbasl6158]

Still not resolved?

[@perumalsamyramesh5775]

They already explained i.e 2.11 From downwards to upward (except pan) 150 mic - 1st sieve 300 mic - 2nd sieve 600 mic - 3rd sieve There our FM is 2.11 that means max. Aggregate was lies between 2nd and 3rd sieve i.e b/w 300-600mic

[@umairuddinshaikh8579]

Sir, if FM of coarse sand exceeds its limit then what it indicates??

[@harendrazsahrawat4205]

Please re-check...the sample is in Grading zone II

[@sherlasaikumar5353]

It is only the most important sieve for fine aggregate and coarse

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Coarse aggregate no where considers 75 micron sieve, For Fine and Coarse 4.75mm is the main sieve because this is the sieve which divides aggregates into fine and coarse

[@bkpandey1657]

Sir " finnesss modulus of aggregate" और "sieve analysis of aggregate " both test is similer ????

[@amansinhparmar7186]

Yes

[@nithyan.s.9561]

🙏🙏❤❤

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

All the best, keep watching and supporting

[@johncane2304]

what about for coarse aggregates

[@nAAAAAAAnveshAnA]

10 mm sieve no need haa sir

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Ha no need

[@trongsarkayta]

It is so disgusting to know that your first retain weigh does not have any values despite having few retain. Please get a sensitive scale. As a suggestion, Japanese weigh the retain with sieves itself and later deduct the weight of each sieves. This will make work easier and leave no soil particles unweighted.

[@mohyahallasame102]

Wrong ❌

[@sukhbirgodsha6920]

Very well explained

[@upendrapatel330]

Thank you sir

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Welcome, stay tuned for more videos

[@sumantamahato8584]

Thank you sir

[@structuralanalysisanddesign]

Welcome, stay tuned for more videos