ABC News tracks man authorities call master art forger to studio in Shanghai.
Пікірлер: 211
@TheEmpress17687 жыл бұрын
I love how they asked him to paint, and he doesnt even have any paint on the brush
5 жыл бұрын
Lmao yes, and the paint on the pallette is dry as hell.
@Sky_TEC_Illustraition_Systems4 жыл бұрын
@ 😂😂😂😂
@itsjustnopinionok6 жыл бұрын
You Go Chinese construction worker master painter.
@baphometpresidente46375 жыл бұрын
i think construction worker has more knowledge about bricks so he probably surpassed the original rathko brick like painting?
@stopmotionmoron23735 жыл бұрын
Its silly that stuff like this sells for fortunes and talented artists stuggle
@colinsushiboy7455 жыл бұрын
Growing up I use to forge autographs. Cause my fav athlete wouldn't sign and I'm to lazy to wait outside coliseums lol. One time I seen my bogus forgery at a comic sports card store. Doesn't take much for a sucker to fall for fakes
@taylorj61775 жыл бұрын
You mean like Van Gogh
@taylorj61775 жыл бұрын
'tis life. It's what happened for Van Gogh (who personally I believe is a bit overrated..))
@danseabreeze14045 жыл бұрын
WHAT??? I'm dying for a famous painting of a circle! : D
@paulocuento99495 жыл бұрын
@@colinsushiboy745 youre my hero bro
@Sum_Ting_Wong5 жыл бұрын
The real hustle is the real Rothko painting
@hughjarsol19338 жыл бұрын
I love the fact that idiots pay huge money for fakes , they own trash .. lmao
@SteadfastHero3 жыл бұрын
How the hell are these squares selling for that much?
@paulsmith19814 жыл бұрын
Modern contemporary art is of such a low standard even construction workers can successfully fake them.
@debspringchannel83118 күн бұрын
Exactly... just the fact that people are paying huge amounts for it is beyond me.
@johnta176 жыл бұрын
What does it say about the intrinsic value of art when they can be faked to begin with? Maybe we are being duped by the real paintings.
@NicholasStClair-zw5er6 жыл бұрын
Finally someone in the comments gets it.
@johnta176 жыл бұрын
Nicholas St.Clair right
@paulocuento99495 жыл бұрын
@@taylorj6177 you dont get it... its all a big scam.. the art world perpetuates this nonsense called "abstract art" by giving a deeper meaning to something that is basically garbage.. to sell it big time...how they convince people is a mix of hype, perception, popularity, and "expert validation"
@deidradahl28022 жыл бұрын
@@paulocuento9949- This is one of the reasons I always come straight to the comment section. looking for someone who can explain more clearly, what I always thought
@MrBignick882 жыл бұрын
rich people don't care about the artist or the painting its the value they care about they use it as a tax dodge by getting loans against it whose repayments are cheaper than income taxes
@suunkarra57636 жыл бұрын
The critic at the end was right, if you like a piece of art and end up owning it, it doesn't really matter who made it. But, with this art bubble people often use works as investments instead which is a double edge sword. On one hand it make sure that great works of art are kept well preserved, while making art that may be quite ugly to some more valued.
@DavidFraser0074 жыл бұрын
This made me laugh when the art expert said Forgers can splash paint too! Well so can my kids, and if somebody wants to pay me millions for their efforts, I accept bank transfers.
@daverigby236 жыл бұрын
Jackson Pollock - why not do your own ? Who's to know. Obviously not the 'experts'
@taylorj61775 жыл бұрын
Lol uh, hello YOU would know. The lack of any concept of integrity in these comments is a sad sight for humanity.
@PCJ524 жыл бұрын
Hold on a minute, I'll be right back. I'm rich! I think I have one of those on my fridge.
@brianrichards70065 жыл бұрын
Unless the artist duplicated the type of canvas and the stretcher boards, and aged the paintings, they should have been determined as fakes by any good restorer. Due diligence is required when spending a lot of money, so I suspect the major dealers and the auction houses were complicit in the scheme. But that information has been known for a good number of years, so it is no surprise.
@2011blueman2 жыл бұрын
The forger isn't forging old masterpieces, these are modern contemporary works (I won't call it art), on modern canvas using modern paints that are all easily obtainable.
@jaimelannister33172 жыл бұрын
Their are very few legit art works left in the world . Many of ur ancient epics and greatworks are forgery . During the Renaissance it was very common to forge great works and epics .
@abbeyan92845 жыл бұрын
If you spend that much on paintings. You deserve to get scammed
@patrickarmitageWWW4 жыл бұрын
6:16 Honest opinion with plenty of wisdom.
@ksuhuh5 жыл бұрын
Modern art forger; easiest part time job for toddlers.
@mnmdisney5 жыл бұрын
I would love to have a good copy from the old masters!!
@EGarrett015 жыл бұрын
3:11 that is a gorgeous painting. I don't care if it's fake. That is beautiful to look at.
@danseabreeze14045 жыл бұрын
FIFTY SIX MILLION for two rectangles of color? AAAahaha, ha! No wonder they're easy to copy! And drips of paint for the other "painting", LOL!
@vetteseller53 жыл бұрын
This is all BS, auction houses thrive on forgeries, they know exactly what they are doing.
@Bickidan2 жыл бұрын
The art world is absurd. It's a competition to show off "success" by having rare, expensive things and to appear more cultured. Fake it 'til you make it. But, similar to having a designer structure everything in your home without knowing much about you, having a roughly painted square on a canvas could say more about you than you think.
@harsh1225p10 жыл бұрын
I would not even buy a real one for more than 100$
@taylorj61775 жыл бұрын
Good for you?
@jigglestumps5 жыл бұрын
Lol. If you have the opportunity to buy a real Rothko or Pollock for $100 you would. Nobody would turn that down... If it had the provenance and the authentication certificate you could sell it the next day for literally 500,000 times what you spent on it.
@suzanneelkerdi35515 жыл бұрын
What a great man 👏
@eccentricdetectorists97546 жыл бұрын
72% of ALL artwork is fake. Sports memorabilia is even worse!!!!
@boxingmotoman2 жыл бұрын
No truer words have been spoken. From 2021 its is a epic bubble of proportions
@terrygause296534 жыл бұрын
Jackson Pollock’s so-called art is proof that the art world is easily duped.
@robhaidheuch4 жыл бұрын
He couldn't fake a Velasquez, a Carravagio, or a Singer Sergeant, so that shows anyone with a minimum of artistic ability could create fake modern art.
@TheFiown3 жыл бұрын
Any person who has millions to spend on a painting deserves what he gets. For me forgers are heroes !
@Flofromprogressive5 жыл бұрын
Let’s be honest, if you truly are an art fanatic you should be able to tell the fake from the real really easily
@2011blueman2 жыл бұрын
If you're an art fanatic you're not buying these garbage children's splotches in the first place.
@doppelbanger57979 жыл бұрын
a child can imitate rothko successfully
@taylorj61775 жыл бұрын
Funny you say that - I painted something quite, quite similar when I was oh, fourteen?? Not as good, but, perhaps passable. Does that mean I'm equal to Rothko - or any other, for that matter? NO. And THAT is the entire point you all seem to be missing. There is much more to a history than just the fact one was a master painter, or whatevr
@vshah10105 жыл бұрын
Are these people even serious to consider that art? Yes, it's just two different color rectangles. I'm not an artist, but I'm sure I can paint that. Also the Pollock painting just looks like he just splashed paint on a wall. I'm sure most people can do that also. I wouldn't consider either painting to be art.
@taylorj61775 жыл бұрын
@@vshah1010 Lmao. Aren't you aware of what a cliche that is? "Oh, I can do that..." Yeah? Then do it. Cuz ya CAN'T.
@taylorj61775 жыл бұрын
Is your avatar a rothko?
@ingridllinas5612 Жыл бұрын
Incredible how experts could be forged despite all the advance tech to prove if paintings were really made by the proper author. Pigments and type or painting are very effective. Some type of paintings have not existed at the time the work was painted. As has happened with Pollock’s and others. I refuse to believe a gallery sells a fake in order to get millions. Reputation, clients and lawsuits are highly important. A life time in the art business can be destroyed in a second. Money just brings prejudice.
@Sky_TEC_Illustraition_Systems4 жыл бұрын
If want to...You can choose to watch and then rewatch the last ten seconds of this film at 6:45 for a shot of this master's technique. The way he strikes and then pulls the brush up and out against the canvas makes for a glimpse at a last stroke that is striking.
@nicksundby3 жыл бұрын
So many lessons here
@phyllisarrington7436 Жыл бұрын
The Chinese guy shouldn't have forged the signature. Because he did it's hardly convincing that he was just painting replicas.
@ninjaprodigy590510 жыл бұрын
I don't get it how can someone pay that much for blocks? What the hell am I missing how can anyone fork over so much money for this shit fake or not?
@lieblee30634 жыл бұрын
That’s a SMART CHINA MAN.Good job sir👍
@AdamPopowski3 жыл бұрын
Dude, Asian American is the preferred term now, dude.
@DarkAndTriumphant10 жыл бұрын
I think my pet cat can forge those.
@fernandocenteno63624 жыл бұрын
Very important.and very important, the ESTYLE OF COLORS,LOOKING FRESH.RECIENT. COLORS.????? Yes Baby.
@manulafuente7020 Жыл бұрын
As an artist i am glad these people and galleries are being scamed! Art is not a commodity and if you buy or trade for gains you deserve to be fooled!
@oseasviewer71084 жыл бұрын
Whatever happened to due diligence for provenance? - those burnt through foolish pride, hubris and arrogance are deservedly 'rewarded'
@BubbaSpartans5 жыл бұрын
Rothko and Pollocks work is great. It’s the art market that everyone should be upset with. If you think Rothko and Pollocks work is simple and devoid of meaning, you should take some time out of your day to learn about them, and most important of all, stand in front of their work and then make a judgment. Art history is much more complex than a simple “Realism” vs. “Abstraction”. Enroll in an art history course at your local community college. That’ll help broaden your perspective. You may still hate Rothko and Pollock, but at least you’ll be able to say why, and expand beyond a snap judgement that social media encourages.
@anindyabagchi275 жыл бұрын
What happened to art!! When I think of art, the Ghent alter piece comes to my mind. Not Rothko.
@StanleyKowalski.5 жыл бұрын
p.o.s called art, thats why easy to fake it. good job forgers
@aaronjohnson81593 жыл бұрын
6:28 is exactly right
@AngelB323 жыл бұрын
Some of the people who spend obscene amounts of money may be art lovers, but let's be honest, for most part it's money laundering and tax evasion schemes that fuel the prices nowadays... And the so called art experts just give the market what it wants...
@Fixingtodraw5 жыл бұрын
You really need imagination to paint like that.
@JackIsNotInTheBox3 жыл бұрын
Kinda feel bad for the forger. He got paid scraps for his talent.
@ernstvolf85374 жыл бұрын
How on Eart someone could come up with the idea it was ART ? :))))))))))))))))
@mr.j93035 жыл бұрын
That guy knew along what he was getting into!!!
4 жыл бұрын
So if you want to buy a Roscoe block of colour....I'll do you one....I've got several I'm using to stop a leak in the rabbit hutch.....
@sinongmakulet5 жыл бұрын
Stupid paintings. If only Michelangelo, Da Vinci, Rembrandt is alive today, they will laugh at these paintings.
@michaelwhite80314 жыл бұрын
A lot of dealers know what their selling.
@taylorj61775 жыл бұрын
The guy at the end is wrong - the lesson isn't that "people don't care about quality of the art, just the name." Many admitted themselves they liked them until they were known fakes... It's that there is more to ANY object that has some specific HISTORY, or "provenance," if you like - it's that we as humans value what we imagine to be a past and its story... a very human thing to do. And that is quite, quite valuable. Would you say the same about, for example, the "lost arc" or something similar? I doubt it...
@rolandopretto10 жыл бұрын
Most funny lisp I've heard in a while
@ARTEllipsepaintings9 жыл бұрын
amazing art world
@2011blueman2 жыл бұрын
The problem is that Rothkos and Pollocks are garbage "modern art" that are no better than children's paintings but a bunch of wealthy people have been fooled into thinking they have some imaginary value. The forger was simply capitalizing on a market full of buyers that are idiots whether they're buying "real" paintings or fakes.
@jacekpokrak92583 жыл бұрын
For centuries, art has fascinated people. The sensitivity of the audience resulted from being stimulated by cultural events, social changes, wars, etc. This is how new directions in art emerged. Today's world needs something else, and that's why Compmaturism. The works of the Compmaturists relate to today's human needs; they are emotional, devoid of routine and calculation. They are filled with art juice.
@readmycomment31574 жыл бұрын
The art word isn't up in arms, it is well aware there are fakes about and it turns a blind eye.
@stanleypratt82932 жыл бұрын
This just goes to show you how ridiculous it is to buy a "block" Rothco or a "dribble" Pollock is. There is nothing special about them like paintings by the hundreds of artists that came before them. Van Eyke, Vermeer, Rembrandt, Carravaggio to Van Gough, Renoir, Monet, to all of the Renaissance masters. I laugh at anyone who buys a Warhol painting of soup cans. What a joke. I don't like Picasso's or Dali's paintings but they at least have artistic value. I know people will hate this comment but beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
@Leumasleumas7254 жыл бұрын
Even fakes are articulate as the OG. The greed of the riches lead to fakes.
@tiwantiwaabibiman2603 Жыл бұрын
That it's "probably" a fake??? No, it IS a fake! I'm an artist and independent curator and can tell from this video that the fake Pollock is a fake by the vibrancy and tone of the colours.
@dashinvaine Жыл бұрын
Oh noes, my abstract masterpiece (that you can't tell which way up it should go) turns out to be by this guy and not by that guy, it's no longer 'real art'!
@dgh4694 жыл бұрын
any jews involved ?
@SendooranSCAR10 жыл бұрын
58mill for painting wow
@maureenobrien32505 жыл бұрын
Is this a joke! Give me a break..
@terriniemeier65783 жыл бұрын
Well it's an Art, love an Artist who is good enough to do a Fake.
@usaisamess88803 жыл бұрын
if you cant tell the real deal from a fake, what is the point of art????????????
@hudamashaan52383 жыл бұрын
If it’s good enough to trick critics, then it’s good enough. The forgers are nothing but talented hustlers
@iJamie8467x7 жыл бұрын
its all mind games
@tushkafilms10618 ай бұрын
1:40 who the hell would spend millions of dollars on that crap. I can throw spaghetti at the wall and make it look better.
@marlenedietrich24685 жыл бұрын
if you can see the painting you're buying, and decide to pay a surden amount for it, how was you fooled?
@jaymcbakerkАй бұрын
Lol art forgers used to need a high level of painterly skill. Nowadays modern art is such a joke that a construction worker can paint coloured squares and rich idiots pull out their chequebooks
@Miko360198 күн бұрын
The Chinese painter got $10.5 million from the $80 million painting.that he had painted .. this came out the New York Times newspaper i read the articles Pg10-11 he did get paid ten million after it was sold by the auctioneer
@danielmayorga48122 жыл бұрын
For some reason chinese art has never climbed the top ladder of European and Western Art. Can this chinese forger could imitate a Michelangelo's David ?
@TurkiyeCumhurbaskani6 жыл бұрын
Even the original Rothko is garbage and worthless crap.
@stephen0112983 жыл бұрын
If you’re gonna fake a painting to sell for millions Rothko is the easy choice
@madjidchouarbi39215 жыл бұрын
The problem with contemporary art is there's no technicity involved in creating those so called masterpieces. As you don't have to be a high technician to paint it, anyone can forge that kind of painting. And because those painting had been made using modern pigments, there's no chance to identify a fake with scientific analysis. To be honnest, making a fake abstract painting is not that hard. Pollock, Rothko, Basquiat and other are really far far away from genius like Cravaggio, Da Vinci, or even from modern artists like Cesar Santos...
@dmac51084 жыл бұрын
You have to be fair, Basquiat is a tad bit better than the likes of Rothko, Franz Kline & Pollock. More on the level of Twombly & Warhol whose work has a more abstract cerebral quality to them.
@dmac51084 жыл бұрын
Also a REAL Basquiat would be rather difficult to duplicate for anyone who knows his work, he had a distinguished, unique hand regardless of his lack of formal technique, unlike the others you mentioned.
@etienne77745 жыл бұрын
What's next.....fake IPhones?
@baphometpresidente46375 жыл бұрын
6:22 sums up the human behaviour
@kennyd36965 жыл бұрын
Vextation of spirit
@hansvetter8653 Жыл бұрын
No comparison to Wolfgang Beltracchi !
@jack7nine Жыл бұрын
Im no expert but the way the forger was using that brush i qustion if hes ever painted
@sharit79704 жыл бұрын
Anyone willing to plunk down $3 m for this ==> 02:00 forfeits the right to complain.
@thomasrapulane62943 жыл бұрын
That's what you get for buying splatter and color blocks for millions
@randomridho10 жыл бұрын
the squares and splashes can be easily done by a 3yr old
@itsjustnopinionok6 жыл бұрын
G people buy that art out of demand. It can be done by a child. But a childs paintings are not in demand.
@moncorp15 жыл бұрын
You're right Im The Mapp. That's why contemporary art is fraud.
@drewpeacock62345 жыл бұрын
Art is Hype
@nobodyguy45244 жыл бұрын
Theres alot of crap art today
@nwk111 Жыл бұрын
Am actually amazed ppl pay millions for abstract paintings that are so simple to paint...why are ppl so stupid to pay in millions for just random red and black boxes 🙄 ... What about those who spend hours on minute detailing....
@Li-yt7zh5 жыл бұрын
That interviewed artist on the run is not the real forger, but a quasi-look-alike paid to double as the man himself. Fooled again :o
@Constantinesis5 жыл бұрын
People who say a child can do better paintings make a common mistake nowadays of replacing a concept with a technique. A technique can ultimately be learn by anyone through repetition but an original ideea needs the spark of genius. Yes anyone can paint a Rothko but nobody could have done it if it Rothko didn`t do it in the first place.
@jasonbernard54685 жыл бұрын
I think rather that no one could sell it if he didn't..
@Constantinesis5 жыл бұрын
Thats also an interesting point of view...
@dmac51084 жыл бұрын
"Art history" is a sham too bro. It's a narrowed perspective on the actual history of art to benefit, promote & validate a small select group of so-called artists, see Koons, Hirst (both corporate artists who barely touch "their" own work), Rothko, Pollock, Franz Kline etc. There is a stage for all sorts of art but there seems to be a lack of art that doesn't need a written explanation to appreciate.
@dmac51084 жыл бұрын
*in the art establishments & institutes.
@turnoffthelights18584 жыл бұрын
This goes to show how art is not about talent, rather it's about perspective. A highly talented individual can turn out reproductions of art, yet why can't he use his talent and create original artwork of his own?! Because he has no perspective.
@weirdscience68203 жыл бұрын
This artist does create his own work but like most unknowns, he went unrewarded for it. Chinese artists, given the sheer population size of China, would be a dime a dozen. All the perspective in the world won't make a difference if the stars don't all align. It takes luck. Can't tell me that only famous artists have perspective.
@magureatari195 жыл бұрын
oh his name is .. unfortunate. gopnik is not the most classy word to call yourself. i know it is not his fault, but... poor guy.
@thesoundcouncil37713 жыл бұрын
People really want to believe.
@dirkdarwin25714 жыл бұрын
Plot twist: Brian Ross is fake.
@mumbailocal54145 жыл бұрын
Come to Chor bazaar India 😂😂😂
@louiscypher70905 жыл бұрын
My 11yr nephew could fake z Rothco.
@vetteseller53 жыл бұрын
The Chinese artist is innocent, the buyers knew what they were doing. They are the culprits.
@inigomontoya6034 жыл бұрын
That chinese guy is the next bigger thing... In a hundred years from now, he'll be the next Van Gogh
@420dab94 жыл бұрын
My man was lucky to be Chinese
@jan-martinulvag19533 жыл бұрын
Even your wife is faking it
@natsalta Жыл бұрын
Who would buy this crap paintings for millions? I do not feel sorry for buyers, even it is a crime to sell fakes