Elon Musk just officially announced the New Raptor 4...

Elon Musk just officially announced the New Raptor 4...
===
#alphatech
#techalpha
#spacex
#elonmusk
#raptor
===
Sources of image & video:
C-bass Productions: / cbassproductions
Christian Debney: / @christiandebney1989
Everyday Astronaut: / everydayastronaut
Cosmic Perspective: / considercosmos
/ @cosmicperspective
Ryan Hansen Space: / ryanhansenspace
/ ryanhansenspace
TheSpaceEngineer: / @thespaceengineer
TijnM: / m_tijn
/ @tijn_m
iamVisual: / @iamvisualvfx
Alex Svan: / alexsvanart
LabPadre Space: / labpadre
Starship Gazer: / starshipgazer
/ starshipgazer
ACTUSPACEX: / @actuspacex6995
@tomket7: / @tomket7
Starbase Surfer: / cnunezimages
WAI: / @whataboutit
THELONELYCAT: www.youtube.co...
ErcX: / ercxspace
Evan Karen: / @evankaren
Robossbomb: / robossbomb
www.youtube.co...
===
Elon Musk just officially announced the New Raptor 4...
Elon Musk has just dropped a surprising hint about the emergence of a new engine iteration dubbed Raptor 4. This revelation comes as quite a shock, considering it arrives less than a year after the testing of Raptor 3.
Now, what sets Raptor 4 apart from its predecessors? What makes it stand out in the realm of rocket engines? Join us on today's episode of Alpha Tech as we delve into the intricacies of Raptor 4 and explore its groundbreaking features and capabilities compared to other rocket engines on the market. Get ready to witness the next evolution in rocket propulsion technology!
Elon Musk just officially announced the New Raptor 4...On April 7th, Elon Musk, the esteemed CEO of SpaceX, unveiled significant details about the upcoming engines set to be produced by the company. In a momentous speech delivered in front of the entire SpaceX team, Musk shared insights into the future of propulsion technology.
Musk stated, "I think ultimately we'll probably aim to get the booster engines over 330tf." This ambitious declaration hints at SpaceX's relentless pursuit of innovation and improvement in engine performance.
Elon Musk just officially announced the New Raptor 4...For context, it's important to note that SpaceX has already made impressive strides in engine thrust. With the Raptor 3 engine, the company achieved a remarkable increase in thrust, elevating it from 185 tons to 280 tons. This leap in performance underscores SpaceX's commitment to pushing the boundaries of rocket propulsion technology and sets the stage for even greater advancements in the future.
===
Subcribe Alpha Tech: / @alphatech4966
===

[@giorapasca8195]

How can you talk so much while saying so little

[@billmullins6833]

LOL Talent!

[@davefarmery8180]

He should be a politician

[@basementbanter366]

Gotta hit that monetization threahold😂

[@viacheslavb3445]

Scenario written by chat-gpt

[@jimhanty8149]

It seems that way as your not able to grasp what you here…

[@chadgdry3938]

I just love to think that Russia is kicking itself when it sees how many launches SpaceX has made, a missed opportunity for Russia's Space industry. Now, SpaceX is so relatively cheap to get a payload to space that it is the only choice for a launch. Wow, SpceX is dominating the Space Launch business?

[@Everton-r7e]

The Russian space boss , once said let them go launch their broom , when the US had to rely on them to take their astronauts to space, wonder what he is saying now , falcon 9 is the most intelligent rocket ever created.

[@SmashPlayz]

Russia has made a lot of bad choices in recent years.

[@chadgdry3938]

@@SmashPlayz@SmashPlayz I agree; they have such a rich history to have turned out to be in this sad state.

[@chadgdry3938]

@@Everton-r7e I know. That was a great line from Russia. It was bound to come back to haunt them, and I think about it when I consider the state of Russia's Space Program.

[@СергейБолдин-в9м]

Why do you like to laugh on those who are weaker... Well, it's not about us at military force.

[@madusmaxamus8670]

Elon Musk has turned my science fiction books into science fact with all the new innovations he is putting out there. I just may see us landing on Mars before I leave. It goes to show that anything is possible with the right mind at the wheel.

[@bobr9512]

Can you redo the audio. tF is tons force not whatever you said and there are other errors.

[@kstaxman2]

This is just another example of the kind of advantages that SpaceX has over other companies. No comparison with other rockets. More thrust, simpler to build, lighter in weight, and reusable all make it very hard for anyone to compete.

[@harveywindbag9469]

I live 15 miles from the SpaceX test facility. We can literally feel their advances in their engines. Just about every day they do an engine test that we can hear and feel. It lasts from 30 to 60 seconds. At first it felt like a train going by in the distance. Over time, the sound and vibration has become stronger and stronger. We noticed one day that our widows started shaking and rattling. Then, later on this past year, our whole house started shaking with every test. Things started falling of the wall and off of shelves. We ran out of the house to locate the sound. It was like a jumbo jet taking off. But, when you go outside to orient yourself to the sound and vibration, it feels like it's coming from everywhere and nowhere at the same time. It's a very unsettling feeling, until your brain kicks in and tells you, "Oh! It's just SpaceX. doing their thing again.". I told my wife that the new change in intensity was probably caused by their testing of a new version of the rocket engine. This video is confirmation of that.

[@MonsterMiniVideos]

You need to sell your house before it's worth nothing with all the cracks and roof starting to collapse. No one is going to buy property near Spacex. It's fun to watch and experience now but soon it would turn out quite the opposite !

[@papa.mike01]

SpaceX will always improve all systems as long as it is a business. The reason you don’t see NASA, a government entity, continue to improve is that they contract out to a company to make a system to meet a certain specification. That’s why NASA’s SLS is using Space Shuttle engines.

[@menotyou1234]

No such thing as a "Saturn 4"... you must have been thinking of Saturn V smashing a Delta IV. Saturn V had 5 F1 engines.

[@carlmons]

Saturn IV was the designation for the second stages of Saturn I rockets... but they did NOT have F1 engines.

[@texan-american200]

Maybe he was thinking about the Saturn 2 from "Lost in Space? " 😬

[@johnstout5767]

Doesn't "t" just stand for "TON"?

[@trespire]

Correct. It should have been notated as T {lower case}force. As in Metric Tons Force.

[@alphatech4966]

It's my fault! I will fix this!

[@bobburich1667]

Everything Musk does in Space x is wonderful for America.

[@ExaltedMediaInc]

interesting content but the AI written script is unbearable

[@classic_sci_fi]

Is the AI what makes them so repetitive?

[@alphatech4966]

I don't know why you think I'm AI but I take note of your suggestions and I will try to improve

[@trespire]

tF is Ton force. Not thrust force. If you're going to report rocket engines, at least get the physics right.

[@alphatech4966]

Thank you so much! I will fix thiss

[@wingssoon]

🔥 Go Raptors 🔥 Keep Thrusting 🔥

[@alphatech4966]

Thank you so much! Have a good day!

[@glasseyemarduke3746]

2:20 F1 used on the Saturn 4? And tF is tons not thrust. Do you research before publishing this clickbate crap

[@scottbrown7849]

Elon, and his amazing team, will certainly need to pimp-up the OLM if those bad boys start rocking the joint!

[@robertarmstrong3478]

tf = TONS Force! Try to keep up!

[@rhekman]

Typical of yet another AI written youtube content farm channel

[@mikey33409]

Let us go farther into space to get The resources we need

[@bryonmartin8463]

Halfway through the video you started restating what you already restated in the first 2 minutes.

[@deanminer2340]

Contex: Complete 1 engine a day, not build 1 engine per day

[@billmullins6833]

Yes. It's something called a production line.

[@justinfocker]

Sometimes I just want the answer to be revealed without the heehawing back and forth for 11 minutes.

[@matthewspencer2094]

You don't keep talant capable of conjuring the Raptor 4 engine without challenging work to keep them occupied. Raptor 5 or a new formfactor engine. SpaceX won't want to loose engineers of that caliber to the competition. They will doubtless find something metal af for them to work on.

[@jackhydrazine1376]

Saturn 4???? This guy doesn't know anything about rocketry history.

[@getone007]

Let’s see 33 V4 at 303 to 330 ton of force will required a complete re work of the OLM if your goal is 3 launches per OLM per day. Just wow it will be something to see.

[@lomgshorts3]

Elon's improvements just keep on coming ! Wonder how NASA can handle being outclassed in so many ways ??? Go SpaceX !!!

[@bryanst.martin7134]

You need to get your terminology straight. 303 tF is not thrust force, but Tons Force. The thrust is measured in force, hence tons force. The way you describe it, it is pounds force, IE 303 pounds force. That won't get itself off the platform. You started right, then went sideways. Words matter.

[@alphatech4966]

Thank you for your reminder! I will note this!

[@markconnelly183]

Also, there was never a Saturn 4.

[@menotyou1234]

SpaceX should cancel All US government launches including the Crew Dragon until the FCC releases the $1B it owes SpaceX, And Elon should make Bye-Done disbar that ill judge in Delaware as a condition..

[@pedrosura]

Dude, do you realize that Space X get money from the government to develop Starship. Then what? Who is going to pay to develop Starship? Elon? Lol I am sure he has no plans to using his own money for that…

[@RedRyan]

Interest intake

[@alexanderbelov6892]

Thrust to weight ratio has nothing to do with sa goal of rocket engine development. The engine has to squeeze maximum of specific impulse from fuel. Then the engineer can calculate ratio of saved fuel to the engine mass. E.g. if you saved 5% of fuel that has 20t value, and you engine increased from 1t to 1.3t, you still have 20t/1.3t ratio you can be proud of.

[@vinceelliott4362]

Thrust force??? Who is this guy?

[@josephthien9302]

the legendary F1 on the Saturn 4???

[@ramosel]

*Saturn FIVE.

[@Trifler500]

Yeah, what's the deal with these people? They've been told many times before.

[@ChristLink-Channel]

@@Trifler500 AI is a slow learner, it seems...

[@Trifler500]

@@ChristLink-Channel Well, they had a video where it said Saturn V as Saturn-Vee, then it said Delta III as Delta-Three. So... :)

[@michaell397]

I knew they were up to something Big! We live only a few miles west of the Test facility in Central Texas. the engines are always loud and you can feel the reverberation thru and thru. However, lately the entire house shakes, china rings, pictures get sideways. Fantastic!!! Love the feel and sound of Horse Power in the morning!!! ;

[@RupicaSinghWaraich]

so funny, wonder about its effect on teeth, will yours fall out sooner due to repetitive rattling?

[@zhongxina9420]

​@@RupicaSinghWaraichdo you keep your teeth clenched when you're close to an explosion? same logic just use common sense

[@vincentdermience1137]

There's gonna be a Raptor 5 sooner or later

[@paulbork7647]

Nice try, but tf doesn’t mean thrust force, as there would be no units, force is measured in pounds or tons (2,200 pounds), with a f designating force and not mass, which would be tm. As I remember Musk’s talk, he did have a diagram or picture of the Raptor 4.

[@carlmons]

Beat me to it! So many mistakes, makes me wonder if this was AI generated... though I didn't see any hands with 7 fingers!

[@markhuebner7580]

"...Thrust Force.." is not a measurement unit, more 2 words with the sa.e meaning. Ton is a unit of weight, indicating the force applied to the Earth at Earth's surface gravitational aattraction. More likely "tF" indicates the propulsion force of a 1 ton mass at Earth's surface, applied to a body in whatever direction is desired for the chosen application.

[@MrVaticanRag]

Please - A Ton is MASS of 1000kg, don't confuse Mass with Force which is measured in Newtons...❤

[@jeremytaylor3532]

The Raptor engines are developing at a rate of a new version each year. And one engine assembled per day. Star ship engines will also follow this trajectory. Older Raptor engine designs could easily be sold on the global market. Russia did very good business selling to the European market, before Putins folly in Ukraine. There has also been a surge in North American private corporate rocket firms, some of which need reliable engines at a good price.

[@sboileau2]

wow like the person reading the script has never seen or heard of a rocket or engine

[@ijwilson]

Thrust force - what a tool! Any credibility for this channel just evaporated…

[@cliffmorgan31]

How many ways can you repeat yourself? On several points! Ridiculous!

[@stevemishler831]

What is a "Saturn 4"?

[@DragNetJoe]

2:24 - Saturn V not 4

[@alphatech4966]

Thank you! It's my fault!! I will fix that

[@AlexSerrano-t6k]

Goodness, why do you keep using the term “thrust force”, as in “304 thrust force”.? “tf” does not stand for “thrust force”!! It’s “tons of force” or “tons of thrust”. Similarly as in “lbf”, that would be “pounds of thrust”. Saying an engine produces 10,000 thrust force is meaningless. Geez man!

[@alanmcmillan6969]

Good for Elon Musk, with his advances into spaceflight.

[@danielnogrady9004]

I enjoy your videos.

[@alphatech4966]

Thank you so much!

[@HamidSalehi-y6q]

Elon is the one make impossible ‘Possible .😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊.

[@stoobydoo2638]

Low content waffle warning.

[@catsupchutney]

Agreed, lots of words like "could", "if" and "extrapolate" and "promise".

[@Momofukudoodoowindu]

A whole ass video of you repeating yourself like 4 times. This could’ve been like 2 minutes long. Yeah, how many times do you need to say “SpaceX is driving down costs” or “they’re committed to innovation”?

[@hydewhyte4364]

It kills me that we're still so far behind the 1960's achievements.

[@KamalaChameleon]

Not true, not even a little bit

[@GoldenTV3]

A Raptor 3 engine has 280 tons of force, One of Saturn V's F-1 engines had about 690 The first stage of Saturn V had 5 F-1 engines Starship has 33 280*33 = 9240 5*690=3450 9240 --------- = 2.67x more thrust than the Saturn V first stage 3450 If Raptor 3 or 4 does somehow reach 330 tons of force. That number changes to 3.15x the thrust of Saturn V first stage. And Starship is 1.1 meters smaller in diameter than Saturn V

[@appliedfacts]

A. Reusability. Saturn V stage 1 landing its self?? LOL B. Payload to orbit C. Far less poluting exhaust D. Rapid launch cadence A+B+C+D>F1 therefore major progress in utility and sustainability

[@ИринаПлатонова-л2и]

Вы неубиваемы однако, еще долго терпеть придется...

[@_MaxHeadroom_]

If they really get the booster engines to 330 tons of thrust it'll be equivalent to three Saturn V's. Amazing!

[@aliasless3972]

Lol I want to put one on my boat.😂

[@EddyKorgo]

boat what?

[@plschwartzx]

How will this added thrust. Increase the payload or decrease the number of engines.

[@TraditionalAnglican]

Payload - Elon wants to put 150 t into orbit…

[@scottymoondogjakubin4766]

More powerful - simpler - and reliable ! This changes everything ! Bigger rockets with higher payloads ! Yes !!

[@alphatech4966]

We can look forward to this change!

[@fkxfkx]

We’ll only need 1 raptor 12

[@ridendrive5815]

I hope Elon Musk also take liking to JET ENGINES. Our airforces will get a very light, efficient, strong jet engines

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Excellent stuff bro, go Elon

[@SpaceUnkk]

Half the thrust of the F1 engine on the Saturn IV? Saturn V!

[@janmessek1826]

I want to see just one of these rocket engines in a smaller version in a winged aircraft which could reach extremely high altitude possibly space and return as a conventional landing craft. Easier than doing a starship for earth point to point travel but using upper atmosphere to allow higher speed travel.

[@RebeccaLarson-v7n]

🤔I’m always astounded by the sheer size of these rockets - the comparison of a raptor next to a human is astonishing - and there’s 33😱🤯🤯 - I’m left speechless (rarity 🤭) and smiling each time I view updates to SpaceX tech. Apex humans. 👏👏👏

[@alphatech4966]

Thank you for your comment! Please look forward to our next news

[@classic_sci_fi]

Is Raptor 3 in production yet?

[@MrVaticanRag]

FFS - how many MegaNewtons in 300 Mickey Mouse "thrust Force" units?

[@zhongxina9420]

about 300 tons of thrust

[@user-erick007]

TF is not Thrust Force . Its Tons of Force

[@jameswalker7899]

Thank you for this detailed, authoritative description of developments by what is perhaps the world's most impressive company! :)

[@christophernickell5744]

Please get to the point

[@christophernickell5744]

Before I die of boredom

[@frankdindl790]

“Thrust force”? Not tons force?

[@alphatech4966]

Thank you for your comment! i will fix this!

[@jojo-ep2pp]

a new firework

[@patrickfavier4310]

Thrust force? Where is that in SI? Or tons of Thrust?

[@ajward137]

Yeah - I spotted that. I think tF means tonnes force. - Conveniently, a ton is something non-SI Americans understand, and it's fairly close to tonnes (which is an SI unit, so the rest of the world will understand too).

[@marianpazdzioch6632]

While you all cheer to new Raport having better numbers than old Raport, I'll ask this : will new Raptor be more reliable in terms of reignition than old Raport ? Or we will see more of those beautiful copper flames every time ?

[@robertnorton4276]

Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is all well and good, but I want to see the Epstein Drive.

[@billmullins6833]

Not until they discover a reliable source for either unobtanium or neverhaveitium.

[@leeannahchampion-bi6uz]

Thanks

[@alphatech4966]

Thank you so so much!!!!

[@TogetherinParis]

Now if SpaceX will now use 1 tank with two big Teflon bags inside it to hold Methalox separate, the booster will diminish in weight by about 40%.

[@THEFORBIDDENMAN-lk7of]

THE SOONER HE GOS TO MARS THE BETTER

[@THEFORBIDDENMAN-lk7of]

THANK YOU 👍

[@sagecoach]

Moon development may offer new manufacturing opportunities. It has resources and is a lot easier to launch from. Space station manufacturing and ports in Earth orbit may prove even easier and safer to launch from going to Mars with nuclear rockets. The strategic possibilities increase with each development. We need to get more use out of every pound we launch into orbit. Deorbiting is wasteful.

[@ronbuckner8179]

Why would the rapter 4 be the last? It’s a stupid question. New thought has to redefine new thought definition. Stupid question.

[@tmg7476]

Ground support has to be able to keep up and SpaceX hasn't gotten its facilities to survive Raptor 2 without significant repairs.

[@alphatech4966]

I'm sure the second launch tower at Starbase will be a place that can withstand the new Raptor.

[@tmg7476]

@@alphatech4966 I'm not sure at all. SpaceX is constantly designing, building, testing, and then repeating the cycle. I don't believe tower 2, while improved, will be final. Same for tower at the Cape.

[@leeannahchampion-bi6uz]

🎉 Seriously guys give the man a break he does so much for most not all to say so little Talk about ungrateful !!!...

[@danielpiche6759]

Starship will have Pegasus star drive engine to go to Mars.... wait for his next series of new engine.

[@spaceman8954]

Hello there 🤗 , just Wanted to ask why rocket's don't Use the atmospheric oxygen until they get higher, like it uses atmosphere oxygen until it's done it's first boost or something like that, I imagine it would be complicated to make the atmosphere pressurised enough for the fuel, just saying it might save on liquid oxygen weight and make more room for more cars 😜 or a vacation chamber for holidays 😅

[@Tony-om5kr]

This was attempted in the early 90's with the X-30 transatmospheric spaceplane that was to takeoff from a runway and achieve orbit. It used air ducted rockets (using condensed liquid air) to takeoff and accelerate to ramjet operation and then transition to scramjet operation at Mach 5-6 with variable geometry inlets. Material technology at the time was not capable and the transition from ramjet to scramjet operation proved to be too great a hurdle. In addition scramjet combustion efficiency was underwhelming. I suspect scramjet technology has improved since then but I haven't been in that business since 1992. IRC even if they had gotten all of the various engine modes and transitions to work, the payload to orbit would have been minuscule.

[@catocall7323]

Congratulations, you've now made an engine which replaces the weight of propellant with an even greater weight of all the extra hardware needed to use the atmosphere. It's also a very complex design that introduces even more points of failure. Normal rocket engines are already incredibly complex and full of possible failure points.

[@johnfrancis4401]

You'd think the pressure would rupture the pipes or the cone directing the gases being expelled

[@appliedfacts]

So...make them thicker or from stronger matierials.

[@pigskin3367]

Time to quit worrying about thrust and start figuring out how to get back through the atmosphere without burning up with all the missing tile…

[@davefarmery8180]

Totally different engineering departments so why not keep developing

[@EddyKorgo]

Lets imagine for a minute F1 rocket engine sized Raptor 4 I think the Earth would explode

[@drmachinewerke1]

Elon needa to make a smaller Raptor and install it in the cyber truck

[@cloggy2000]

tF... There is no unit "thrust" Force"... How about "tonne" Force

[@alphatech4966]

Yeah! It’s my fault! I will fix thiss

[@alphatech4966]

Thank you for your comment

[@MrVaticanRag]

Fix your confusion of failing to understand Tonnes measure MASS and your lack recognising Force is measured in Newtons.. When will the last two countries in the world, USA and Liberia, implement ISO units?

[@Matt6X]

No internal combustion engine will allow us ever to really conquer space. We may jut have few more space adventures and mishaps.

[@supraa66]

Time at a time. Not so far ago we couldnt sail or fly across continents, progress take time and generations of brilliant people

[@TraditionalAnglican]

It will get us to Mars, Venus, Near Earth Asteroids & much of the Asteroid Belt & possibly Jupiter.

[@Runt8887]

Anyone see the frequency thing with water and all the shapes and patterns it makes from sounds. wonder if the same could be applied to gases as a form of fuel manipulation thru vibration to a degree of efficiency above randomized gas molecules bouncing around chaotically.

[@paulmoffat9306]

Arrgh! The narration has a term wrong -> 'TF' is NOT 'Thrust Force', but IS 'Tons Force'

[@jimdonatelli2012]

i think they will need a much better launch pad and table

[@captainprimo7033]

Now it will become Thrustworthy.

[@DaveBegotka]

I think NASA of the 60's and 70's is still kicking the sh*t out of Elon if you "believe" them

[@user-wn4nl7bp9h]

yes, if

[@nickv8816]

Well when you have an unlimited budget, a Cold War, an arms race and a space race I’m guessing the entire nation comes together to do amazing things. Elon is doing it with a limited budget and haters all over this nation that want him to fail. Yet he still getting it done and at a way cheaper cost. Do you see NASA ever doing that again???

[@dongeiger4500]

Why are they not using the newer engines on the falcon 9 I understated uses different fuels so maybe they need to use the second tower in Florida or Texas as a test launch pad for the newer engines. I would imagine that the payload of falcon 9 would greatly increase.

[@joeygrandview7304]

Falcon 9 is obsolete as soon as starship is ready, waste of time and money to further develop falcon 9/heavy

[@noppornwongrassamee8941]

@@joeygrandview7304 Also, I imagine they want to use up all the Raptor 2s and 3s that they've already made rather than throw them away.

[@billmullins6833]

@noppornwongrassamee8941, makes sense to me. They have those engines which were built while learning how to do so, why not use them while still in the prototype/R&D stage?

[@joeygrandview7304]

@@noppornwongrassamee8941 the falcon 9 in its current configuration is a proven, and more importantly, certified rocket that can receive a launch license, again waste of time and money to further develop falcon 9. Not to mention completely remodeling the launch complex for cryogenic liquid hydrogen vs room temperature RP-1 (rocket grade kerosene)

[@joeygrandview7304]

@@billmullins6833 @noppornwongrassamee8941 i highly doubt they want to use extra raptor 2s, or soon to be obsolete raptor 3s,for anything, spacex has never been shy about getting rid of anything that is inferior. Spacex has proven not to entrap itself in the sunk cost fallacy. Better to scrap them and move on.

[@Transparencies-EST.1787]

He dont want to keep the R4 he's already going for R5 .. that rocket is 500 tons to get that up, will take some science. crazy 11 plus million pounds

[@arclight545]

How can you be talking about rocket technology and call the Apollo rocket the Saturn 4??!??!😊

[@pernambuco92]

cada turbina de um motor do saturn v tinha 5mil cv só para jogar combustivel... é um monstro

[@tvg138]

what are the emissions data?

[@ChristLink-Channel]

Mostly water, very minor amounts of other stuff. Why?

[@kkarllwt]

talk talk talk. a very long 4 minute video. A channel I wiull not watch again.

[@jameshotz1350]

The Russians claim they invented the Raptor engine.

[@MdRejowan-kf6pm]

Well... they invented the first full-flow stage combustion cycle engine. The RD 270

[@johndsmith-gv8zh]

FJB

[@glasseyemarduke3746]

Full of inaccuracies and uneducated guesswork

[@Jose-fu8ub]

I was going to say the same thing

[@alphatech4966]

There will be a few mistakes and we will fix those! thank you for comment! Wish you have a happy day!

[@arthurwagar88]

Half way is enough.

[@kettlecinema]

Saturn4?

[@reginarider]

I Will no longer watch this vlog because of a critical error tf=thrust force? I can't take this person's knowledge seriously.

[@alphatech4966]

Yes, it is tons-force, sorry for the mistake here! We will pay more attention!

[@beaker2400]

Good video. Please adjust your pronunciation of "In-Situ". Thanks.

[@possisvideos]

to much noise, i miss the facts.😂