Amazing Discovery - Recently Found Bible Confirms Quran Miracle!

In this remarkable video, we delve into the astonishing discovery of a recently found Bible that provides evidence for miracles previously thought to exist only in the Quran. As Muslims, we have long known the story of Prophet Isa (Jesus, peace be upon him) speaking as an infant while still in his mother’s arms, as well as the story of how he breathed life into clay birds, bringing them to life by Allah’s will. Surprisingly, these miracles were never mentioned in the canonical Christian Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John.
However, a groundbreaking discovery was made approximately 150 years ago in Egypt. A hidden monastery, lost in the sands of time, revealed its secrets to a team of explorers. Among the many scrolls and texts found, one stood out-a Gospel long thought to be lost to history: the Gospel of St. Thomas. This Gospel, unlike the ones familiar to Christians, contains both of the stories about Prophet Isa that Muslims have known for over 1400 years through the Quran. It recounts the miracle of Isa (Jesus, peace be upon him) speaking from the cradle and the miraculous story of how he breathed life into birds.
The significance of this discovery cannot be overstated. For centuries, Christian scholars mocked these stories as Islamic fabrications. They claimed that such narratives were not found in their Bible and dismissed them as myths. Yet, with the unearthing of the Gospel of St. Thomas, an ancient Christian text hidden for centuries, these very stories are now part of the historical Christian record. The Quran has, once again, been vindicated.
But why was this Gospel hidden? The answer lies in history. In the year 325 CE, at the Council of Nicaea, the Roman Emperor Constantine and his council selected only four Gospels to be included in the official Christian Bible, while the rest were ordered to be destroyed. Thousands of other Gospels and Christian writings were lost to history-burned, buried, or hidden away. Some of these ancient texts occasionally resurface, like the Gospel of St. Thomas, offering us glimpses into early Christian beliefs that were deemed heretical by the early church.
The discovery of the Gospel of St. Thomas, containing these two miracles, is not just a validation of the Quran but also a clear reminder of the miraculous nature of revelation. As Allah mentions in the Quran: “You were not with them, but Allah revealed this to you.” This verse emphasizes that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) did not have access to previous scriptures; it was through divine revelation that he shared knowledge previously unknown to the world.
This video takes you on a journey through history, exploring the significance of the Gospel of St. Thomas and how it aligns with the Quran. We also examine the broader implications of this discovery-what it means for Muslims, Christians, and interfaith dialogue. How does this change our understanding of early Christianity? What other hidden texts might exist, waiting to be discovered? And how does this reinforce the miraculous nature of the Quran?
Join us as we uncover these remarkable findings and reflect on the truth of the Quran. This is not just a historical discovery; it is a spiritual one. It is a reminder that Allah’s revelations hold the ultimate truth and that time only brings further proof of His divine word.
Watch this video to explore the historical, theological, and spiritual dimensions of this discovery. Share it with your friends and family to spread awareness of this important validation of Quranic miracles, and let’s engage in respectful and enlightening discussions about the implications of this discovery.
Watch the full video here and deepen your understanding of the intersection between Islamic and Christian historical narratives. Don’t miss out on this fascinating exploration of a long-hidden Gospel that reveals the truth we've known through the Quran for centuries!

[@merter8508]

Subhanallah, Islam is the true, original, uncorrupted message of God !

[@GoodMan_000]

No shit ?

[@esahg5421]

subhaanAllah!!! 🇿🇦💚🇵🇸

[@esahg5421]

​@@GoodMan_000read Quran its awesome 👍

[@GoodMan_000]

@@esahg5421 Hahaha... YES Especially when sun goes to mud , and human is created by some cloth.

[@esahg5421]

@@GoodMan_000 you literally just demonstrated that you have never read Quran. you just repeating old b.s purposely misinterpreting. shows a lack of education. islam is best for you if you only knew.

[@ropol2x]

Subhanallah ❤ With all of these evidencs, and still they disbelieve. _As for those who persist in disbelief, it is the same whether you warn them or not-they will never believe._ (Quran 2:6)

[@AkanIbnDja]

Where is the evidence??? “O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful.” (Surah 49:6) Where is the evidence??? All we heard was the claim?? Where in this gospels does it talk about Isa AS speaking as a baby??

[@djamelzitouni950]

No, there is no mention of Jesus speaking as a baby in the Gospel of Thomas. That is exactly what I dislike in the way those "scholars" spread information mixed with half truth because they know that most Muslims do not read books, they just revere the likes of Zakir Naik, Qadhi and others and repeat their mistakes. You didn't take the time to double check what Qadhi is saying.

[@rehmanishaak1503]

They playing politics with the religion !!

[@MMalik-rs2hg]

رضيت بالله ربا وبالإسلام دينا وبمحمد صلي الله عليه وسلم، نبيا ورسولا

[@ooze91]

MashAllah, the archaeological evidence continues to mount

[@Ryan_Nath]

But still no archaeological evidence of a 6th century mecca ?

[@s.bk.655]

THE VERSES MADE ME CRYY !!! 😪😪😪

[@buddharatnashinde4334]

Brain washed

[@rehmanishaak1503]

Quran is a complete guide from Allah for the total mankind !!❤❤

[@GoodMan_000]

Hahaha.....like Komunism.

[@gihanmahmoud5293]

@@GoodMan_000read Quran with open mind and heart and judge ❗️

[@Wildwords.ibrar.r]

Ma sha Allah. A very good piece of information and the recitation of the Quran is mind blowing. JazakAllah khairan.

[@buddharatnashinde4334]

Block mind

[@garrickgriffith6402]

Subhan'Allah! Allahu'akbar!

[@sinan_islam]

They accept only the scrolls that fit the faith they desire.

[@bernadetteshinton6236]

Jesus the light the truth the way. The only way. ❤

[@ikkycpt576]

Also in the gospels of St Thomas it is written God is not born from a woman...which puts a end to the trinity which is false !

[@maitre3750]

Sogar die heutige verfälschte Bibel bestätigt den Islam und den Koran. Matthäus 26:39: ‘Und er ging ein wenig weiter, fiel nieder auf sein Angesicht und betete und sprach: Mein Vater, ist es möglich, so gehe dieser Kelch an mir vorüber; doch nicht wie ich will, sondern wie du willst.

[@SM_Umair]

Brilliant. Subbed. May Allah grant you all good, Ameen.

[@Cyberautist]

A much more convincing, yet controversial argument for the authenticity of the Quran is Sura Yussuf. If the claim that this Sura is a copy from the Biblical story was true, then in the Bible we find that a Pharaoh is mentioned in the story of Joseph. Yet Allah referred to Malik - a king, and nobody asked why not Pharaoh. The story of the 15th dynasty is, that there were 6 kings from the Levant who ruled Egypt for 140 to 170 years; we don’t know the exact duration, but a Historian named Manetho of the late Ptolemaen dynasty gave the names: Salitis/Saites Bnon/Bêôn Apachnan/Pachnan Iannas/Staan Apophis Archles/Assis The last one is mentioned by his royal name “Al-Azeez” in the Quran and he was the last of these king because he was conspired against. The Biblically faithful Quran interpretation says Al-Azeez is the Potifar. And that Imra’at Al-Azeez is the wife of the Potifar. I promise this is not a Quranically faithful interpretation, but Biblically imposed on the Qurans indication. But in fact this is what the people used to call the king. This fact was impossible to know at the time of Muhammad (saw), because the Hieroglyphs were a dead script and the conspirators against the Hyksos who became the 18th dynasty erased much of the history of the presence of the Hyksos kings, out of shame for being ruled by foreigners and because to protect themselves to being ruled again by supporter of the Hyksos. So it was only discovered in the last two centuries that the Quran was right to use king and not like the Bible to use pharaoh. So if you follow a Biblically faithful interpretation of the Sura Yusuf, you will not get rid of the impression that the Quran could have been just copied from the Bible, and that the Tafseer books contain these Israiliyat as part of their explanations makes even worse. Or as as the brothers in Sura Yussuf themselves say: (12:77) […] ۞ قَالُوٓا۟ إِن يَسْرِقْ فَقَدْ سَرَقَ أَخٌۭ لَّهُۥ مِن قَبْلُ ۚ They said: If he has stolen then certainly had stolen a brother of his before. Meaning if the books of Tafseer contain in their bags Israiliyat which do not belong to them, then certainly the older brother Yusuf aka. Muhammad (saw) had stolen Biblical texts before; otherwise why would we need Israiliyat if the Quran hasn’t been copied from the Bible. And that is their devious argument UNTIL TODAY! They have no clue that the Sura Yusuf actually has no need to be interpreted in a Biblically faithful way, because this a revelation by Allah, not mere book. Allah is self-sufficient and so is His revelation a reflection of sufficient mess and contains no weaknesses. It’s even more a stronger argument that this is not copied from the Bible and that Allah revealed the Quran in truth, while some people belied this very aspect of the Quran and introduced us to Israiliyat that had to be avoided and yet our tradition is full of these weakspots undermining the integrity of the Quranic revelation to be mere copies from the Bible - which by the way isn’t even the original Book of Musa. The current Bible is nothing more than the version of a priest named Ezra who tried to rewrite the Bible together with helpers. They wrote 200 books of which we have only 66 to 73 in the current versions. So there are over 100 books missing. But Ezra put marking in his rewritten version, so that the coming Elijah would fix these mistakes. Obviously that Elijah is awaited by the Jews till today. So the current Bible is not the original and yet in our tradition it is referred to Israiliyat as if the Jews possessed the original material. They don’t and to interpret Sura Yusuf with corrupted and twisted material is not faithful to the Quran at all. If you can show the true interpretation of Sura Yusuf, you would bring the proof that the Quran is not copied from the Bible and doesn’t need Tafseer books filled with Israiliyat. Or you admit that the brothers in (12:77) and you have no proof that Muhammad (saw) has not been dictated stolen material from the Bible. Clean Sura from the Israiliyat and you have produced the actual proof for the divine origin of the Quran or you will have only a belief without evidence. So the first step is to make sure that you don’t agree with what the Bible dictates Sura Yusuf should be interpreted. Don’t assume you know because you know the traditional story! There are no dreams and no seduction in the Sura Yusuf and there is no famine. Get this out of your head and analyse with discipline and give respect to the proofs Allah provides you IN THE TEXT, so that you obey Allah in how to interpret and not the Israiliyat. Indeed there are no dreams in Sura Yusuf and Yusuf is not interpreting dreams, but he knows the language of the Hyksos, because Ale-Yaqoob and the Hyksos are from the same region. So the Sura Yusuf doesn’t teaches about the interpretation of dreams, but the interpretation of discourses (Taweelul Ahadith) which is mentioned in Sura Yusuf three times (12:6&21&101) - I don’t know why people ignored this willingly! Actually I know! Because the Bible never mentioned this fact , so it should not be interpreted in the Quran that way, even if the Quran itself teaches to interpret it that way: Ayat (4:140), (6:68), (33:53) mention the word Hadith to mean a conversation or talk. Yet our scholars didn’t seem to catch it when it came to Sura Yusuf. I don’t wonder at all why they didn’t tried rethink Sura Yusuf with the Biblical narratives in mind! They couldn’t recognise that this not from the Bible but a revelation from Allah. They failed to unlearn the Biblical narratives for the sake of a Quran based interpretation! And everyone with a pure heart should expect that an intelligent interpretation of the Quran bases solely on the proofs given by Allah in the Quran to remain in the boundaries which Allah has set for a credible interpretation, not a Biblically faithful interpretation by ignoring the boundaries of Allah for the sake of a easy and quick interpretation. O people of the grave! You have done a grave mistake by introducing Israiliyat to the interpretation of the Quran and you had no right to do so! And so we declare disassociation from your interpretations and follow the proofs and principles Allah has set for us in the Quran, even though you might wish us never to get rid of your Israiliyat. But the only source of guidance and knowledge is Allah the true one deity, while you took between you and Allah other sources, without right. So suffer your ignorance but we will seek the approval of Allah who is the Rabb of the As-Samaawaat and Al-Ardh. He alone deserves to asked to teach us the interpretation of the Quran, not sources who have no authoritativeness, nor are they submitting to the boundaries Allahs has set. Thus we submit to the proofs Allah disclosed about His Ayat. Not are we to kick out Allah from the Quran and take other sources as authorities over the interpretation. And it Allah who discloses what He decided to conceal for a while. Nor do we want to speak out of fancy neither do we want to disregard that Allah is well capable to teach in a methodical manner those who approach the study of anything with the necessary discipline and principles and a methodology which Allah makes evident for finding truth. May Allah increase us in ilm and insights.

[@DaReaL1-s5y]

Who’s reciting

[@bramkayser3194]

Omar Hisham Al Arabi

[@yhiaramon4706]

Subhan'Allah

[@Foundonetruth]

Double check if it’s the gospel of Thomas or infancy gospel of Thomas

[@abduqadirmohamednoor8200]

Quran is true the words of Allah you like it or not You will find out on the day of resurrection 😊

[@buddharatnashinde4334]

Brain washed

[@lshed28]

The Quran is the Word of demons

[@sayeedafareed266]

We should translate name esa ( a.s) as esa (a.s) only

[@hannahsavage9013]

Jesus Christ loves humanity dearly and died for us to save us from hell damnation. Believing in Him will save us from eternal flames and give us perfect peace that you can not find in the world. Accept Him now by repenting from your sins and ask Him to pardon you and start living right, trusting Him as you follow Him. He heals, comfort, blesses, and will also deliver those who put their trust and faith in Him. Jesus Christ is the only way to Heaven.

[@-xt5km7lq3p]

mashalaha

[@Abderrahmane_Aitouche]

We need the words on the screen of your videos valiant-Sister, it helps us understand and learn English

[@VIKITONAGA-ji6jl]

The song really touch m ❤ N takes me to deep thoughts 🤔

[@alhassangangu4357]

It is not a song, it is the recitation of the Glorious Qur’an

[@alhassangangu4357]

I like the recitation of Shaykh Omar Hisham

[@QUARTZdls]

Does anyone know what is the name of the person who is performing the recitation at the end of this video? Thanks for your help!

[@lbgenius2981]

He is Omar Hisham (the surah read is Ali imran)

[@MNee426]

Alhamdulillah, but the ignorants always hate the truth.

[@lshed28]

Your fake prophet is in hell. Jesus is Lord and every knee willl bow to Jesus. This guy said a lot of bs. But like alll Muslims you don’t check your sources

[@hidekiaoyama8191]

Allahu Akbar ❤

[@hotstonemedia376]

the Quran recitation at the end of the video, who is the reciter? and where can I find it? please someone send a reply with some info on it, a link if possible.

[@The.moon-gt7vf]

Can you write the number of verse i don't find it in Google

[@maitre3750]

Sogar die heutige verfälschte Bibel bestätigt den Islam und den Koran. Matthäus 26:39: ‘Und er ging ein wenig weiter, fiel nieder auf sein Angesicht und betete und sprach: Mein Vater, ist es möglich, so gehe dieser Kelch an mir vorüber; doch nicht wie ich will, sondern wie du willst.

[@Shaxxn]

Who was the reciter?

[@kuukhc]

it is the Infancy Gospel of Thomas you want, not the Gospel of Thomas found at Nag Hammadi. both of them and the acts of Thomas were found to be too wild and fanciful to be genuine writings about the life of Jesus and were thus excluded from the canon. they were however known and they were also known and read by the Manichaeans and Mandaeans or Sabians who were around at Mohammed's times and thus it is not surprising that these stories are found in the Qoran

[@mujtab304]

In Quran surah19 verse 28 its refered to Mary mother of Jesus AS sister of Harun some scholars challenged our holy book for mixing two different personns other responded Mary mother of Jesus AS have a brother named Harun this is the issue.I only hope will find a gospel that will confirm the existence of Harun brother of Mary mother of Jesus AS no offense you can only know through research and listening to scholars like this one Mawlid Mubarak

[@WhiteBlack-ug2mz]

The prophet replied to that directly : حدثنا أبو كريب وابن المثنى وسفيان وابن وكيع وأبو السائب ، قالوا : ثنا عبد الله بن إدريس الأودي ، قال : سمعت أبي يذكر عن سماك بن حرب ، عن علقمة بن وائل ، عن المغيرة بن شعبة ، قال : بعثني رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم إلى أهل نجران ، فقالوا لي : ألستم تقرءون ( يا أخت هارون ) ؟ قلت : بلى وقد علمتم ما كان بين عيسى وموسى ، فرجعت إلى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ، فأخبرته ، فقال : "ألا أخبرتهم أنهم كانوا يسمون بأنبيائهم والصالحين قبلهم " .

[@mujtab304]

Is there a list of gospels found in the coffin I hope will find on those lost gospels a narrative confirming ours with the explanation of Mary sister of Harun

[@uwu-nkun6895]

Brother, we already know. Quran doesn’t say Mary is sister of Aaron. Quran says, people referred to Mary as sister of Aaron. And indeed people used to address other people in that time. Jesus is called son of david. Elizabeth is called daughter of Aaron (Luke 1:5), read greek text. So the greek says daughter of Aaron, translation says descendants of Aaron.

[@mujtab304]

@@uwu-nkun6895 No BRO this is your own translation it says sister of Harun go do more research please

[@uwu-nkun6895]

@@mujtab304 don't ask people to do more research when you haven’t done your own. Who is harun? Mary is Maryam Jesus is isa Aaron is harun Moses is musa

[@uwu-nkun6895]

@@mujtab304 actual name of Mary is Maryam. In English, people say Mary. The hebrew of Mary is Miriam. The aramaic is Maryam. That's why Quran says Maryam. The real name of Mary.

[@uwu-nkun6895]

@@mujtab304 the real name of jesus. It is still not evident what his actual name was. The greek yeshua means God saves. From it came the english jesus. We don't know his aramaic name. The hebrew word for yeshua can be isaiah or yehoshua. Isa or shua = saves Yah or yeho = God So it is highly likely that from isayah came ÎSA in aramaic. And It's probably the actual name of jesus.

[@petercarr2371]

It’s interesting how the Bible gets weaker with time and more discoveries, so much so all they can claim is to have a better understanding of the lost gospel of Isa (as) than is actual disciples.

[@JohnKrestik]

I have an understanding that it was the angel Jadreel or some pronounce Gadreel was the messenger to your prophet not the angel Jabriel or some pronounce Gabriel was not the angel messenger to your prophet also the manifestations of Jadeel have been stories in the Kabba. Would it have been easy to change the Arabic letters from Jadreel to Jabriel. ? or maybe called Jadriel and changed to Jabriel. What would uthman have to do to change a. D to a B

[@WhiteBlack-ug2mz]

What even are you saying? Bots nowadays are even more stupid

[@GoodMan_000]

YOu should know if you ever read quran that no miracles in quran. So why you go against mohammad ?

[@mahlazer]

Truly spoken like a buffoon who never read the Quran and too handicapped to use even google or chatGPT. Prophet Muhammad SAW do many miracles in the Quran such as splitting of the moon and Isra Miraj (which celebrated as a national holiday here), and many more. Don't be an ignorant in the age of technology, you have no excuse.

[@GoodMan_000]

So younare basically saying that mhammad copy paste from three wicked disciples of Manes....,Hahaha....

[@The.moon-gt7vf]

he never even go to Egypt your brain is 💩

[@georgesaidi1515]

You people are 😂😂😂😂😂😂 and confused 😮😮😮

[@Finnegan-e5i]

LOL....what a joke

[@RealUltraHunter]

. Okay you can try it for yourself brother

[@aliataie101]

There are grave errors in this lecture.

[@MakaiJohnkenneth]

Mentioning the story is not so special because we both agree Jesus performed miracles. Most historians show it's written much later and us fabricated. But most 8mportznt issues are that Mohaned is no where refered to as a descendant of Ishmael through Kedar. No history Not in Quran Not in bible. That's important because Islam is built on a lie if we can't prove this

[@KTee-eb1tv]

Islam is the truth and you missed the point of the video

[@hummingbird6420]

Muhammad was Arab, a place where Ismael inhabited 🥴 and where no other human was living before , a desert. So Ismael made a community in Arab in Makkah. That prove is enough that Muhammad is descendant of Ibrahim and Ismael.

[@davidawitor3494]

Without lies Islam dies😅😅😅😅

[@lozspennymoor]

Total rubbish

[@bonggasyawali1182]

I read gospel of thomas as shown in the video and there arent any stories about baby Isa a.s. talking and birds coming to life there. Please dont use wrong story for dawah

[@formidablefaith569]

Here is an excerpt from the Infancy Gospel of Thomas: "When Jesus was five years old, he was playing at the ford of a brook. He made soft clay and formed twelve sparrows. It was the Sabbath when he did these things. And there were many clays that were not yet in the hands of the children of men, and they were lying in the water. But Jesus said, 'Behold, a sparrow!' and he breathed into it, and it became a living bird."

[@bonggasyawali1182]

@@formidablefaith569 yeah its from infancy gospel of Thomas, which different from gospel of thomas, its found in different time and place, Paul from Blogging Theology give a lot more accurate story than Yasir Qadhi

[@JameLove-x3b]

😂😂 haaa Muslim the page is fallacy

[@djamelzitouni950]

Sorry but it does not speak of Jesus speaking as a baby. That is exactly what I dislike in the way those "scholars" spread information mixed with half truth because they know that most Muslims do not read books, they just revere the likes of Zakir Naik and Qadhi.

[@hameratahir]

😂

[@formidablefaith569]

Here is an excerpt from the Infancy Gospel of Thomas: "When Jesus was five years old, he was playing at the ford of a brook. He made soft clay and formed twelve sparrows. It was the Sabbath when he did these things. And there were many clays that were not yet in the hands of the children of men, and they were lying in the water. But Jesus said, 'Behold, a sparrow!' and he breathed into it, and it became a living bird."

[@djamelzitouni950]

@@formidablefaith569 There is no trace of Jesus speaking in the cradle. The Gospel of Thomas and the Infancy gospel are two different texts. May be I am wrong.

[@JohnKrestik]

No all of the Arab infant gospel stories are great stories wonderful but were wrote by authors unknown and unverified by friends and family of jesus.so it is nice to hear of stories of toddler Jesus in Egypt but nothing can be verified we the Gospels got errors and incorrect facts that disqualify the Gospels from the bible.mistakes that make appear the authors were not even familiar with the places and the people. We read everything and use discernment but enjoy would have been nice for a biography of Jesus whole life but do not have one only 4verified Gospels of his baptism, ministry, transfigureation cruzifiction. ,ressurection and ascension.written and witness,and verified infant gospel stories may have happened and were folk lore stories the told by mouth not written ,but the infant Gospels can not be verified and trusted

[@uwu-nkun6895]

And Mark, luke, john, matthew are unknown authors as well. There's no way to trace them because they don't have their LAST NAMES. So these choices of book collection is based on what?

[@JohnKrestik]

The infancy gospel stories are not true the arabian infancy gospels were well known and are fictional stories from 150 AD there were and are many gnostic and coptic gospels very popular around 600 a d ,but now 1400 years later are not popular there is many errors and incorrect statements that make the quran incorect and full of errors when these stories used in quran. Fictional gospel stories rejected from cannon of new testement for having errors,untrue accounts,unverified authorship, folk lore same as the false fictional cruzifiction story copied from many gnostic,and coptic gospel stories, gospel of seth,gospel of peter,and many other fictional stories. latter on the quran and gospel of barnabas plagerised these old gospel stories and claim devine inspiration

[@R007CarrotVUX]

Christians reject parts of their Bible. Muslims accept the whole Qur'an. And you only claiming yet not being able to disprove the Qur'an showcases that you are weak and astray.

[@gabraltus6699]

So if this is true, what about all the other mistakes and contradictions in the 4 gospels today between each other. Sonetimes stories completly different from each other? Why does qoran not contain contradictions, even if it is only a copy of wrong gospels? Let not mention all the other wounders and the linguistic of the qoran. Then the other point: even if we agree on qoran is a "copy" of old wrong gospels, then for it to contain these wounders of jesus a.s. and still remain that way after 1400 years, shows atleast the fact that the qoran did not change for 1400 years, what about the authenticity of the 4 gospels we have today?.you dont even know exactly who the author are? There is a whole science about the corruption of the bibel even the churches agree on. But nice try

[@songoodivehi7896]

You have no clue of what you are talking about.

[@beng2729]

Hahahahah

[@JohnKrestik]

Neither can the Quran be verified and trusted

[@uwu-nkun6895]

😂 and what's your argument for that?

[@uwu-nkun6895]

1 john 5:7, john 7:53-8:11, mark 16:9-20 not in earliest manuscript. Evidence of corruption in gospel. Why is your gospel reliable?

[@JohnKrestik]

Did uthmam have one Quran,? Did he burn other people alive with their Qurans?did he burn all other books and Qurans?did he burn all the books in library in Alexander?why did he do all this if his book was real inspired scripture?destroy all evidence of plagerism and corruption?uthman was an evil man?ialams Bible from uthman no other proof?no one knows if your Quran really came from your prophet?Muslims have faith it was and not corrupted but do not have proof?

[@JohnKrestik]

The original gospels scripts were documents original citations and quotations compiled latter into synoptic Gospels dead sea scrolls find the gospel of Nazarene in good shape and ebonite gospel in bad shape mutilated from 70 ad historian Jerome said it is the original. Matthew. Muslims to his was 700 years before your prophet books were huge and heavy back then everything mostly we rotten on scrolls so when I say the cannon Gospels written 50to100ad mean then original recorded quotations and citations many documents so is possible when make the New testament some documents added some maybe were not used who knows but there is no evidence of corruption that the Muslims always talk about

[@JohnKrestik]

Most early coptic and gnostic Gospels and books were written in Syriac and written 100ad to150ad. In this video he talk about the Nag Hammadi collection of texts written in coptic ,discovered in 1946 in. Chenoboskion Egypt across the Nile river from the town Nag Hammadi have old and new testament codices many apocalypse codexes all these rejected from cannon and hidden from the Muslims in there book burning days there were historians to jat comment on many books and were well known as herises for errors and inaccuracies the muslims did destroy many old writings we have never found again Muslims try to destroy all written knowledge send mankind down the path to the dark ages

[@Ryan_Nath]

They're not recently found** They're gnostic writings, written centuries after the actual Gospels. Stupid fake stories were copied from them and put in the quran. But funny enough, in the infancy gospel of Thomas, Jesus says he was created before the world and that he knows everything. Those 2 things you reject.

[@hummingbird6420]

Oh so Quran scientific miracles are copied from which scientist ? Can you elaborate... And copied ? How can Muhammad copied from other texts when he was illetrate? Oh he must have some super power to read your books and stories in other languages rather than Arabic 🥴🥴🥴. He was super human who read other languages and write a scientific book.

[@Ryan_Nath]

@@hummingbird6420 Scientific book ? Lol the part about how embryos form, which was copied from someone earlier than muhammad ? which, by the way, is wrong.

[@hummingbird6420]

@@Ryan_Nath who studied embryos before Muhammad 🥴 and explain it to Muhammad in so much simple words as now a days a whole chapter is needed to illustrate the human embryology. Anyways that's not the only miracle there are so many lol. 🥴 He was super human right. And who was so precise at that time to write the exact phenomena of embryo formation without any mistake and Muhammad must be super human to copy exactly correct information excluding any wrong one.. even though he was illeterate still he was super human to read and write anything and copy it with great understanding lol. 😀 Which u can't do. Why don't u try copy and make something like Quran. You have whole world in your hands now.

[@Ryan_Nath]

@@hummingbird6420 I think he was called Galen, a physician, surgeon and philosopher. Wrote about the embryo stages, the quran repeats it. But like I said, it's wrong. There are no miracles, semen is not produced between the back bone and ribs, the sun does not set in water, stars are not missiles to shoot down demons. Has it even crossed your mind that maybe muhammad had nothing to do with writing the quran ? I mean, it was written 2 centuries after muhammad. Jesus loves you, muhammad and allah don't. Blessings

[@hummingbird6420]

@@Ryan_Nath maybe that Galen was Muhammad's friend and personally came to tell him what to write in few lines everything lol. Or maybe he must have called him. Or vedio chat him by magic. Anyways Quran never says Sun sets in water lol. Don't come up with lies. Quran says that person Saw that sun was setting in water. Lol. Quran says about semen so today's advance science shows that gonads are formed first in that area of rib and backbones where kidneys are during embryos development. Later these organs decends down in both male and female. And even during development Artries and veins that supply blood to these organs are present in that areas the main one. Also the nerves are there who serve these organs. So how that surgeon knew that lol. The origion of Gonads. Oh and shooting star. It has mis translation as the guess from stars like now a days astrology. Throw or jet is not the literal only meaning it's mean guessing. Anyways there are so many scientific miracles. Lol. Maybe you want to hear I can write One is recently discovered. The pulsing Star. Scientist have heard the voice of pulsing Star and it's same as someone knock on the door. While in Quran that star is mentioned with same meaning as knock on door. Lol. Maybe Muhammad the super man has some advance technology to him to hear the voice of star. Lol. And for it's written 200 years later lol. There have been discoveed brhimingham manuscript which is carbon dated to when Prophet Muhammad was alive and on it is written Jesus was just a prophet and not son of God. But son of Marray...

[@JohnKrestik]

The ,coptic, dosetic,gnostic, Gospels not in the new testament cannon many authors not known that is one of the reasons not in new testament Bible but the Mathew,mark, luke,John,acts by Luke,James,Jude,john1,2,3, And John the revelator all written by them all around 50to 100ad proven hundreds of times by even many universities only Islam disputes the validity of Gospels and the Cruzifiction real story even is historical Jewish and Roman documents prove the cannon. the fiction Gospels great stories but are just stories all can be proven false but Quran again has fairy tails passing off as inspired from angel.just like the sleepers ot the cave Greek pagan mythology Muslims claim inspired truth from angel muslims favorite verse kill one is like kill whole mankind is from the Cain and Abel stories Jewish midrash and apophraca Adam and Eve,Quran a rerun of jubiles,jasher, cave of treasures all my favorite books but all plagerised by Quran oh and there is Muslims favorite Paul he just have some letters written to some7 churches written around 50ad Muslims dispute everything that has to do with Paul anyway the inphancy gospel stories are great stories but are just stories all were well known 1100years ago but not popular at all now a days except in the Quran I challenge you to find anything in Quran that was not written before

[@uwu-nkun6895]

No brother, your earliest manuscripts fragments are from 2nd century. Their names are p45 and p66. The complete manuscript is codex sinaiticus which is from 4th century.

[@uwu-nkun6895]

The historians agree crucifixion happened. The Quran also agrees that people thought crucifixion happened. But Allah saved jesus. The historians say, jesus was not born of virgin birth. How will you prove he was? Don’t say It's a miracle when bible says so. But Allah saving jesus can't be miracle because Quran says so.

[@uwu-nkun6895]

I can prove with my Quran that jesus was born of virgin. But you appealing to historians have dug your own grave. Tacitus, josephus no historian who wrote about crucifixion were an eye witness. They all were born after 33 AD. their written manuscripts are thousand years apart from when they lived. What are you on about?

[@uwu-nkun6895]

You challenged anything written in Quran which is not known before. I'll give you plenty. In old testament, The ruler of Egypt at time of joseph is called pharaoh. In Quran, the ruler of Egypt at time of joseph is called king. From modern archeological discovery, we know, The ruler of Egypt at time of joseph was 15th dynasty king hyksos. He was not a pharaoh, because the term"pharaoh" didn’t even exist then.

[@uwu-nkun6895]

I hope you know, in islam heaven and paradise is different. Paradise or hell is where people go after day of judgement. We and the stars are in 1st heaven, jesus is in 2nd heaven. The universe is 1st heaven. Quran 51:47 expanding of universe which is hubbles law discovered in 1920. Quran 41:11 heaven was smoke in a stage of formation

[@rajupmathai]

You have no historical knowledge.The 27 books of new testament were canonized in the council of Hippo in year 393. This was later affirmed in the council of Carthage in year 397 and 419. Constantine has nothing to do with it. No aphocryphel or psuedo gospels were distroyed by church. That is the reason they are still available. Many of the quranic stories are from these books too. But after combining quran king Uttman ordered to burn all other qurans in his kingdom and they burnt thousands of quranic writings. This is the so called divine preservation of quran.

[@duajek]

The Quran was written at the time of the prophet Mohammed pbuh and we still have the original scripture preserved. So there were no other Qurans ever. Also, the Quran is preserved through memorizing it word for word by millions of people so it could never be changed. Which means what you are saying doesn't make sense. On the other hand, Christian theologists admit that the bible has been changed many times. There is no original bible in Aramaic and the oldest one in Greek was written long after the time of Jesus. The bible has many contradictions too which is acknowledged by Christians who have studied the bible. It has been corrupted too much so it's not reliable

[@duajek]

How can the Quran be different now when we still have the original writings in the original language from the time of the prophet? The Quran has been memorized since day one and now by millions of people. So what is your proof that it has been changed if it matches the original?

[@Dawah_Help]

Those who claim to be "Christians" cannot even agree among themselves how many books are in the "New Testament"!

[@zarabees2123]

Too much of worshipping the cow has clouded your brain.

[@jumpingjack5651]

There was no King Utman. He was a Caliph. Big difference between Caliph and King. You need to educate yourself on why the Qurans were destroyed. As Muslim territory increased people moved away from Medina and started to write their own Qurans which were variant when compared to the original copy made by the first Caliph called Abu Bakr. This copy went from Abu Bakr to 'Umar the 2nd Caliph and then to Hafsa the fourth wife of Muhammad and a daughter of the second caliph Umar. And by the way just as now many muslims had memorised the entire Quran. Today millions of Muslims have memorised the Quran unlike Chrsitians where probably none have memorised the Bible. 'Uthman used this single original Quran to make copies which was then distributed to all parts of the Muslim empire and destroyed the variants. "The impetus to do this was provided by Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman when he returned to Madina after observing regional differences. He said to him, "Take this umma in hand before they differ about the Book like the Christians and Jews." So he sent for the copy made by Abu Bakr which was in the possession of 'Umar's daughter, Hafsa." Hope that helps and you can check this story for yourself. Your Bible is corrupted for example the verses about the woman caught in prostitution is a forgery and you can check on that for yourself and still present in your Bible. The reason Abu Bakr the first Caliph made the first Quran is because amny of the Muslims who had memorised the Quran were dying in the battles. Google history of the Quran and educate yourself.

[@saveworld_fromvirus]

Show me evidence dont show off dont tell stories

[@farooqahmed-md8fg]

114 sayings and 114 chapters in the Quran?