AMAZING HIT 3 ROULETTE IS PROFIT CITY!!

[@dustyarcher]

Really a great system. However I would do a little modification. Don’t wait for the jackpot of all 3 colours hitting. Once in secession profit make the switch to the other colour.

[@peterk2343]

Totally agree... Bets could get pretty high otherwise

[@michaelmontgomery8424]

@@peterk2343 I would also move the first 12 especially if all three hit.

[@larrydesignonline5724]

I played this system twice and won $210 in 15 mins and $285 in about 30 mins. Not in the casino but on the simulator CR. The bets were low, I got up to $135 on the second session and then got the jackpot which put me over my win goal of $200. I will be testing more, so far so good. Thanks RM.

[@user-tp6kb9sm5h]

Finally a progression method that works. I tried this out with real money online with live dealer. Made some changes would reset after any new high profit but would play the same color if most of the previous numbers where the opposite and now shows signs of changing. Played $1.00 chips and made $140.00 profit after about 40 min. Will try this more often to see what percentage of winning sessions can get.

[@LindaSanders-zw7px]

Thanks for that info. this looks promising.

[@larrydesignonline5724]

Thanks for the info, please keep testing and let us know. What online casino? How long does it take to get your winnings?

[@rgonzales2126]

This one is pretty good. Matching 3rd column and red and 2nd w black gives the most jackpots, but changing 2 things would help drastically. 1- reset to base bet after new session high before hitting all 3, and 2- alternate between 1st and 3rd dozens to spread the risk. There’s the same number of (hit 3) jackpot numbers when you alternate between those dozens.

[@patrickmurray8451]

The reasonable progression keeps you from blowing the bankroll. I like this system

[@Fat_Buddha]

You could also rotate between 1st dozen and 3rd dozen depending on what has hit the longest because they have the same # of blacks or reds as the 3rd or 2nd column.

[@rutheraquino6378]

I like this system!

[@LindaSanders-zw7px]

I like the concept of this one.

[@TheRouletteMaster]

Thanks for sharing.

[@Fat_Buddha]

I just did the math on a variation of this, but betting on (Red, Odd, and 3rd Column) or (Black, Even, 2nd Column) because there are more odd #'s that are red and more black #'s that are even. That way you cover more of the board too. Probably an existing system, but I just found out about it.

[@cassandrathatsme4382]

I would modify this slightly as has been mentioned already. I would switch after reaching a $50 profit. Relying on 1 of 3 specific numbers to hit simultaneously before switching means you increase bets quite a bit before hitting. Either a profit target or a new profit would eliminate many of those long and expensive streams of losses. You would build bank slow and steady. You won't have wins in the hundreds, but you won't have as many successive losses.

[@peterk2343]

I like this one.

[@redbirdsjunkie]

Do you have a catalog and/or list of the systems you've played/would recommend? For example, the CEG guys have that silly fruit scale but it helps to know which grapefruits to test out, thanks.

[@martinkohler1551]

These casinos are crazy to allow games that are so easy to beat. I’m quitting my job on Friday to become a Roulette Master.

[@otracosa7587]

Yes of course, don't leave your tongue in cheek for too long though 😂

[@lemontek]

Doesn't it seem curious that if you bet EVEN,.. and a zero comes you loose. When zero is arguably the MOST even number on the lay-out?

[@TheRouletteGrinder]

Cool system but I worry about staying on 1st 12 entire time, couldiss for many spins.

[@sonnyzaro7664]

This is a modification of the Dr Pepper, by adding that dozen bet into the mix. What I don't understand is, you change color, you change column, & the dozen stays the same, no movement. There is an equal amount of red & black in each dozen. I'd like to know from the author why he always applies the 1st dozen to this strategy. I must have been absent in roulette school that day, when taught the 1st dozen is more apt to hit than the other 2. Regardless, it stood up & won the day. Kudos.

[@cassandrathatsme4382]

The color is changed as black and second column gives you wheel advantage. Same as red and third column. The dozen doesn't have to change, as the ball will land equally in each dozen over time. There is absolutely no advantage in switching dozens unless we want to lie to ourselves, pretending the dozen just landed has a disadvantage. It wouldn't matter if he switched dozens on every bet. The odds are equal to all

[@sonnyzaro7664]

@@cassandrathatsme4382 I understand all of this. There are instances of bias where as the wheel may hit more frequently on another dozen. It's about not reading the reader board, it's reading into it. Continuing in just that one area gives you under a 1/3 chance of hitting. Yes there all equal, movement changes the flow, nothing wrong in staying there. I follow what I read into, rather than just looking at it.

[@cassandrathatsme4382]

@@sonnyzaro7664 You will always have less than 1/3 chance of hitting on any dozen bet, as the zeros give insurance to the Casino. If any dozen bet had exactly 1/3 chance of winning (meaning no zeros) there would be no casinos. They would all be bankrupt. Even using a random number generator to replace roulette numbers and try to avoid bias, eventually even they lean to a bias when we reveal our preferences. I find they are more reliable than Casino Royale though, as the algorithm isn't privy to our intended bets. They just deliver numbers. As I was running one idea based on third column for quite a while, Casino Royale is offering me a massively biased number of third column results, and as Roulette Master had said... a number of losses surrounding zero bet. It has flaws and it has its biases once it figures us out. Lol

[@barringtongilbert9230]

was just thinking that....if 3rd 12 hasn't hit for3/4 then change to 3rd 12....otherwise, look forward to trying. Does ANYONE remember 'Round The Clock'?...Still doing it for me!

[@larrydesignonline5724]

@@barringtongilbert9230 No, what is Round THE Clock? Please share.

[@rickkern5785]

Luckiest series of numbers ever.

[@chuckrunkle]

Betting on Third Column, wouldn’t it make more sense to bet Black for wider coverage? Same thought with Second Column and betting Red?

[@handsomefarid]

If this system is played with real money it could have any outcome! Not necessarily! Any system can have any outcome with a certain set of numbers in that session! Every single system can do good or bad with any given numbers! It all depends if the man upstairs wants to give or take your money away! Nevertheless having a good knowledge of the game can significantly increase your chances of winning! This system personally I think is a magnificent one! Roulette master your followers never seem to disappoint neither do you! Thank you for sharing this incredible system! ❤the roulette master and appreciate your great videos 💌! Will definitely try this out in the next visit to the casino without my wife 😉!

[@DonaldStandring]

Nice grind system.

[@barringtongilbert9230]

Takes some concentration but yes. it works very well.

[@pinkguitar9]

what this and other systems tell us is that it's best to reset to base bet when good profit is reached because a downtrend is inevitable sooner or later. Thanks Sid and RM! good one.

[@Wayne_boje]

Nice system 😊

[@TheRouletteMaster]

Thanks! 🙂

[@lucmalafarina1807]

I wish people understood how important the ''spread'' is in any progressive system. Betting $5 with a $2000 bankroll is suicidal. The spread is 400 (2000/5). That recipe ignores the crazy volatile nature of the roulette when it comes to small exposure (100 to 200 spins). My experience tells me the spread should be between 5000 and 10 000, depending on which type of progression one uses. That's why betting the smallest unit possible with the largest bankroll possible is always best if you plan to play roulette on a regular basis. A 0.1 starting bet with a 1000 dollar bankroll is one example of a great spread. Starting with 5 dollar units with a 2000 bankroll is a mistake that is sure to cost dearly in the short run.

[@pcgamer7507]

That's the problem I think people generally know this large bankroll, small starting units. But myself in particular I try to use this method of thinking but after half hour I'm a few bucks up and I'm just thinking I need more, I want to make more quicker. You see these videos that make a few units every day and that's great but I think most people want more and more. When you play for 1 hour and have made a few units it doesn't feel life changing.

[@lucmalafarina1807]

@@pcgamer7507 I know what you mean. Keep in mind, this doesn't mean you're bound to only win small money after grinding for hours using the biggest spread possible. It just means you're ready to weather the storm and not be stressed by big swings, all the while working towards your profit target. Depending on the progression one uses, you can make more than 200 units in an hour, which is great. If one plays with a 0.1 unit, that means more than 20 dollars an hour. I'm testing this approach and it's working great even after 35 separate sessions of play. I never needed more than half the bankroll altogether, and that seldom happens (maybe 2 or 3 times out of 35 so far).

[@nicholsj6]

Tried this out on live dealer and worked pretty well. Modification - reset at session profit, rotate dozens 1st, 2nd and 3rd, when reaching session profit or 2 out of 3 win, and columns/cololr/bet rate remains the same as demonstrated.

[@larrydesignonline5724]

When you say live dealer, Is that online or casino?

[@nicholsj6]

@@larrydesignonline5724 online with FanDuel.

[@Roulettebeststrategy]

If this system is played with real money ,then it would come out as the worst system..

[@Wayne_boje]

Not if u move around, I’ve done very well with this system 😊

[@Roulettebeststrategy]

@@Wayne_boje 😊😊

[@CitizenJohnnyLee]

$550 in 32 minutes? Make 3 modifications and you have $570 in 19 minutes, $1,275 in 32 minutes and no up and down using the worst progression and actions on a loss and no succubus even bets on red / black.

[@larrydesignonline5724]

@ROULETTE.system 18 I don't understand, can you expand on that comment. When you say real money, do you mean online or in the casino or both. I guess what you are saying is playing on a simulator is a waste of time?

[@sherrya3465]

Why is that

[@ProHaulersDFW]

Tried this on sim a few times and it did pretty well. Reset after session profit. Might consider trying at casino

[@otracosa7587]

Suggestion for you: when I find a system that does well on a simulator for quite a while then I remind myself of somewhat of a commandment "you didn't try it long enough, try it for a longer period of time". This has saved me so much money because in the end all systems will take the same percentage of the total of money wagered.

[@jahbulonjaja191]

I like this system, and as per comments below I don't see any harm in switching dozens whenever you want to. The columns are relevant as they provide wheel advantage as commented below. my opinion.

[@barringtongilbert9230]

4.48 ... Focus, man, focus!!! Lol.

[@geekassets6479]

Slow methodical system with excellent MM!

[@TheRouletteMaster]

Glad you like it!

[@kylecrum9943]

I wanted to get your thoughts on this strategy, I know it's slow but I think it's fun! Put 5 units on a color and one unit on both 0 and 00 if you lose double up and add one more unit to the color, for example if you start the game with $5 on red and $1 on both 0 and 00 and you lose the second spin would be $15 on red and $2 on 0 and 00. If you hit your color go back to the beginning of the process...lmk what you think thanks!..hopping for the 0's to hit!

[@larrydesignonline5724]

Sounds good, I will try. I always usually modified most systems to include the zero bar. Then the zeros turn into my jackpot

[@allanfahrenhorst-jones6118]

Quite nice. I like the fact that you spread the bet, this is good. I would like to see this played using the, "play like a pro" for choosing the colour... I'm guessing the colour picks the column. Don't know what picks the dozen. So I might like to use 1-18 and 19-36. Downside to this is obviously not a 2/1 pay.

[@rutheraquino6378]

But I think I’ll use the 2nd dozen

[@TheRouletteMaster]

Thanks for sharing.

[@ny86yanks]

Try holy grail on columns two and three (top two columns)

[@otracosa7587]

​@@HRGreenSharkwhy?, mathematically it makes no difference which 2 dozens or columns you choose.

[@kylecrum9943]

Working better if you start with $10 on the color and $1 on 0 and 00 then just double after loses go back to the beginning after a win

[@kylecrum9943]

Sorry for blowing up your comments lol. $10 on a color $1 on 0 and 00 and double on loses adding an extra unit to the color after every double so the first lose would be $30 on the color and $4 on 0 and 00 reset on wins

[@jeffxanders3990]

You're playing with 27 numbers on your side so play $10 or more strait up, increasing only if you really need to, and score better with less risk. I like this one a lot.

[@michaelmontgomery8424]

Hey, just a suggestion here the simulators are not realistic if it was I'd be a multi-millionaire on roulette. If it's in your budget maybe you should consider purchasing an actual wheel. just a suggestion love your Channel.

[@cassandrathatsme4382]

These simulators are digital games. The mission of game developers is to keep us playing. If they tip the scales only 3% or even 5% in our favor vs real life play we convince ourselves we are on to something, and that we are far smarter than we actually are. That 3, 5, or more percentage advantage a game offers will give us more wins and make us feel good, and keep our interest. How often would we play a game where we lose always, and right away?

[@roberttassone7676]

CEG uses a live wheel. It takes 4 people to produce a video. Kudos to RM for his methodology but rng is wayyyyy diferent than live wheels. Practice where you play is best.

[@roberttassone7676]

The bottom 4 numbers of the third dozen hit frequently. Always one or more on the reader board. I did very well play these 4 numbers on RR live

[@cassandrathatsme4382]

@@roberttassone7676 hmmmm The editing turns me off CEG. They get far too many straight hits, and plenty of opportunities to edit out the ones that actually lost. Even worse, I also do not like the banter there. The 'locker room talk' is a massive turn-off. The trade off wasn't worth it. I'm not going to watch two guys talking about their butt hair in order to learn how to lose money more slowly. It doesn't help that one of them looks unwashed a LOT.

[@roberttassone7676]

@cassandrathatsme4382 not an endorsement of CEG. Just pointing out what it takes to produce a live wheel channel. RM is working alone.

[@donruvelas5684]

Lost a 2500 dollar bank roll on this system today in less than an hour.

[@cassandrathatsme4382]

I don't doubt it. It's all down to random play and luck. You still have 9 completely open numbers exposed with no bet covering them, plus the two zeros. You would also have other numbers covered once, offering a slight loss. Therefore, you would lose plenty of times and win some of the time. The Roulette wheel is genius. For the Casino.

[@sherrya3465]

I’m completely spooked by the roulette wheel. The first time I went to an actual table to play the guy next to me who after I lost a hundred..i just sat and watched as he lost like 6k ..this new gal who needed direction frequently from boss lady..mostly about outside bets etc.. well she threw 11 first column bets all in a row and never doubled one of the numbers not once! The only number in the first column she didn’t throw was 13 before she was dismissed for a break! She seemed completely unaware that it even happened and she smiled and shrugged with a deep breath like I just didn’t know i was just that good.

[@barringtongilbert9230]

RM....You said if any lost, up by one unit but you didn't do this on the first bet. Any reason?

[@mitcher420]

I wonder why he prefers 1st Twelve all the time?

[@peterk2343]

Me too... Switch the dozens around too to save yourself from a possible cold streak

[@Wayne_boje]

I would definitely move around on the dozens, u moving around on everything else 👍🏻

[@otracosa7587]

Good question but I think it doesn't matter over a long haul. I dare you to try this: on simulated play do an hour of 1 credit on first dozen and do one hour switching the bet around among the dozens. You will find it's irrelevant.

[@Wayne_boje]

@@otracosa7587 I don’t agree with you

[@peterk2343]

Usually doesn't matter but can protect you from a cold streak. I was recently playing at a real casino and betting the last 2 dozens that have hit. One dozen did not hit for. 25 straight spins, hit once and then did not hit for another 12 spins.

[@timothycross5457]

3rd dozen must be turned off. Lol

[@RickLeduc-t7e]

Number 14 repeated and you thought it was 1st dozen??!!

[@otracosa7587]

TODAY'S REVIEW: I know I sound quite repetitive but it's the truth. The system played has (according to probability), a hit percentage of 36%. RM ended with a hit percentage of over 41% and that's how he won. The system is mostly insignificant unless the outcome of numbers gives you a hit ratio above your odds. So again, can anyone claim to have a system that does that??. NO, NO, NO AND NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@CitizenJohnnyLee]

Any system that is up and down after wins is not a good system and not a good progression. Remove the succubus red / black bets, and make the bets on a 12 and a column Independent bets longest to hit using the superior progression on 2-1 bets, Fibonacci Progression with less than a $2k bankroll, beats this system in 19 minutes and the full session wins $725 MORE @ $1,275!

[@otracosa7587]

I don't think that changes to any system make it better or worse. You will always lose an identical percentage of the total money you bet. Naturally I am talking in the long term.

[@CitizenJohnnyLee]

@@otracosa7587 The modifications of the system is really the system I used. Yet A system if played, with only a couple of exceptions, beats every system in the last couple of months played here yet a system only played once.

[@martinkohler1551]

I’m not sure I have the bankroll nor the patience to play all of these great systems.

[@jeffxanders3990]

I wouldn't change the bet until I lost one.

[@shoperry3646]

Can you please be conscious of the fact that you are partially blocking the board

[@tonyciaramello9835]

I went down to 825. Then quit

[@JamesKing-mr8fd]

Tested this out. Not a fan. Here's why...when I get down $500 using a system, then I hit the "jackpot" and I'm still down $150!...no thanks, not for me. This isn't a "grind it out" system, this is a "grind it out until your bankroll disappears" system.

[@BcottStudios]

Its different at the casino. Its rigged. I lost 200 and its rigged for sure.

[@NineballChris]

How long did you play it? Were you in profit at any point in your session?