#42 Rate of convergence of Regula Falsi Method | Rate of convergence of False Position Method

Thanks for watching
Rate of convergence of Regula Falsi Method
Rate of convergence of False Position Method
In this video lecture discussed basic concept of regula falsi method
Rate of Convergence of regula falsi Method in Hindi,
Order of convergence of regula falsi method,
regula falsi method in hindi,
order of regula falsi method,
regula falsi method rate of convergence,
what is rate of convergence of regula falsi method,
numercal analysis regula falsi method,
regula falsi method of numerical analysis,
regula falsi method of engineering,
regula falsi method of BSc.
numerical analysis of gaduate level,
numerical analysis of graduate level,
how to find rate of convergence of regula falsi method,
how to find order of convergence of regula falsi method,
numerical analysis
Subscribe Like + Share
FOLLOW MY FOLLOWING LINK:
●AMMATHS TUTORIALS (Subscribe)
goo.gl/PZxFAC
●Follow Twitter: goo.gl/68tZpg
●GOOGLE+: goo.gl/y7nEES
●FACEBOOK: goo.gl/VKgwrb
●BLOGER: goo.gl/GA9o5N
www.ammathstuto...
#numericalanalysis #regulafalsimethod #falseposition

[@Official-tk3nc]

Sir i am from NIT you are teaching better than my professor who takes 2 lakhs salaray every month and he teach us nothing. You are teaching me for free. You have a good future . Love you sir.

[@priyasrivastava7534]

Ap kis nit se ho plz reply kariyega qki this year mai bhi nit mai admission lene ja rhi..

[@Official-tk3nc]

@@priyasrivastava7534tamil? congrats for that the professor was changed.

[@priyasrivastava7534]

@@Official-tk3nc can u give me idea about nit calicut for mathematics?

[@Official-tk3nc]

@@priyasrivastava7534 yeah great go for it.

[@priyasrivastava7534]

@@Official-tk3nc thanku

[@bhaskargarai8371]

Awesome sir, I couldn't understand what was expected while proving the error...But now I understood what was the logic behind it....Thank you so much sir..

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

thanks your feedback

[@sayema1205]

Sir your are such a great teacher, nice explanation

[@skku0036]

THIS IS RATE OF CONVERGENCE FOR SECANT METHOD 😶🥴😑

[@rahulkumar-hc9jp]

THANks a lot👏

[@Kimi456b]

Thank you it's was so good...❤but is secent method bit i am ok because i also went secent method so it's good for me ❤

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

Very good!

[@ehelper8099]

Your voice is nice...and very pretty explanation..

[@bimaldeep3364]

Supper 👌 sir thank you for crystal clear 🙏

[@manojkumardandapat2037]

Nice explanation Sir ...Thank u alot ..everything is coming to understand

[@bluestep06]

Rate of convergencr of regula falsi meathod as well as secant meathod is same if anyone is confused

[@adityakalaac-5022]

Thnx captain Levi's

[@AnkitSaiyan]

Thanks Sir for easy tutorial

[@harshsharma75502]

Sir very inspiring method...

[@anujisharwal]

Excellent explanation sir

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

Thanks and welcome

[@ashwinikumbhar9400]

Thanks sir, u explain very nice

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

thanks your feedback

[@ankushverma450]

Well explained Thanku sir

[@arfapathan1832]

Thank you sooo much sirrrrr

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

Most welcome

[@sanjaymathur9514]

very nice explain kiya sir

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

Thanks and welcome

[@hlen2006]

Nice explanation sir.

[@tanushasharma8763]

Very very good😊

[@souravlearningpoints8458]

Thank you sir

[@devamsingh9252]

very long but now unforgettable

[@Mathomaniacc]

Nice explanation sir , but in book(RK Jain) given that RF method has linear rate of convergence it's means 1

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

ok

[@DHMathematicaAcademy]

Can you make a video on stability finding of Newton and Halley method

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

i will try as soon as possible

[@nisafatima1835]

Nice 👍🙂🙂

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

Thanks for the visit

[@bikrambose2783]

Very nice sir 😍🤗🙏

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

Keep watching thanks your feedback

[@sushreesangitabehera8912]

Sir app rate of convergence of secant method ka vdo banaliye plz sir

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

Will try

[@yash.dwivedi]

Thanks

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

most welcome thanks your feedback

[@mayanknamdeo3161]

This is convergence of secant method plz check it sir

[@gauravgupta1345]

👍👍🏆🎉

[@babool2050]

Nice sir

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

thanks your feedback please support my channek

[@NeerajKumar-yl9bw]

sir why have you not negleted the terms of power e^2n in taylor series while solving .......

[@AnkitSaiyan]

because e is error which is already too small and squaring it will make it more small and so we can neglect it... We also expanded [ 1 + ((f''(alpha)/f'(alpha)) (en+1 + en) ] ^-1 using binomial expansion which resulted in squares of e which were also too small to consider so neglected.

[@nandhinikanniyappan9677]

Super

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

thanks your feedback please support my channek

[@sandeepjaiswal7505]

Nice explanation sir thanks for help us, Respected sir please "Runge--kutta" method bhi karwa dijiay, then koi bhi aap kay iss vedio say pura NA padh legga 🙏🙏

[@sandeepbhatt4469]

This is not the convergence analysis of the regula falsi method. This is for the Secant method.

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

ok

[@siddhitripathi4956]

Regula falsi keh k secant method ki convergence kra di😵‍💫 Guys regula falsi method's convergence is 1 and 1.618 is the convergence of secant method.

[@ninaddarji4830]

Rate of convergence of regula falsi is 1. 1.618 is the rate of convergence of secant method

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

ok i will check again . thanks your information ..

[@karansoni3716]

Yes you are right

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

rate of convergence of secant method and regula falsi method are same . i request you check again..

[@mayank_m007]

@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS regular falsi is 1 Book Reference is Jain and Iyengar

[@shashank_kishore_]

sorry sir but this is for the secant method not the regula falsi method... i've checked multiple times

[@sujitrai9817]

Secant method

[@shameematabasum5550]

sir is regular false method always converges?

[@poonamkilania3045]

There is difference b/w rate of convergence and order of convergence.... order of convergence of regula falsi method is 1 , whereas rate of convergence of regula falsi could be anything b/w 0 to 1 . The process u have explained in this vdo is for secant method not for regula falsi method. 1.618 is order of convergence of secant method .

[@funnyvideo8983]

Are you sure about this???

[@poonamkilania3045]

@@funnyvideo8983 yeah

[@anjumalik24]

if it comes in 2 number to direct formula likh de???

[@kumarkeshav5414]

Kya h sir aapke wajah se AVI glat ho jata mera paper regula falsi ka linear convergence hota h ye AAP jo btay h wo secant method ka h

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

aap phir se check karo.. mai bhi ek bar check karata hu. thanks to inform me .

[@kumarkeshav5414]

@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS sir B.s Grewal k page no.920 me dekhe example 28.3 k just above k lines ko

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

rate of convergence of regula falsi method and secant method are same ..

[@shikharsinghrathore3028]

@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS You are wrong they both don't have same rate of conv.

[@chankubhai4517]

Sir 19:50 py kesy kiya apny wo to 1+f"(@)/f'(@) wlaa tha na neechy wala minus main kesy hua??

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

i will see most welcome thanks your feedback

[@harshitsingh456]

binomial expansion of (1+x)^-1

[@sagar3817]

That is applicable for secant method😒😒

[@jasleenkaur3522]

Regular falsi method ka rate of convergence 1 ni hota kya?? Please explain sir

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

nahi

[@rajanand6884]

is't this the rate of convergence of secant method?

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

ok. i will find my mistake.

[@somashaw3388]

Sir secent method ka rate of convergence ka proof v kya same hoga???

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

same as regula falsi method..

[@kushrana4141]

@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS No its not.

[@yashrajmaurya9734]

What's the name of your Android App sir ?

[@supriyasilwal1607]

Rate of convergence of false position method is 1

[@HRBGamer-lo6qn]

It is for secant method or regular falsi method 😂

[@jakula8643]

With all due respect you should realize your mistake (if rate of convergence of Regula Falsi is 1.6 ) please provide the source.

[@its_neel_ok]

Regula falsi has 1 secant method has 1.618

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

ok

[@AbhijitDas-mj7cu]

It's wrong. Regula-Falsi method is linearly convergent. Please rectify the result.

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

ok i will check..

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

rate of convergence of ragula falsi method and secant method are same.. ans correct hai .. i rquest you check again

[@AbhijitDas-mj7cu]

@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS I am sorry to say that you are wrong again... Both the methods have the same formula and that might be the reason of your error. You might not have noticed that one of the method viz. the Regula Falsi method is a bracketing method and the other one is not. As a result of bracketing the root, Regula Falsi has linear rate of convergence. I recommend you to study the topic thoroughly and see your mistake. Thanks Abhijit

[@ritzie_official_123]

This video should be deleted...you are teaching wrong...this is for secant method...before putting any video you should be checking it a number of times...if I would not have checked it on Google ...my marks would have surely gone....do not play with our exams okay...if you want to help then help with your heart. Not merely by putting video without even seeing whether your material is correct or not

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

thanks to inform me i will check and correct

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

i have three book .in all book given rate of convergence of regula falsi method 1.618 .another inform you that rate of convergence of regula falsi method and secant method are same..i request you check againg

[@ritzie_official_123]

Actually the relation that has been obtained at 20:26 upto that everything is correct...but after that whatever has been done to obtain the result belongs to secant method

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

but in my book given result 1.618 I have H K DASS BOOK ENGINEERING MATHS.AND HAVE ANOTHER TWO BOOK GIVEN SAME RESULT. BUT I WILL CHECK AGAIN MORE BOOK.. THEN DECIDE .... MY AIM NOT GIVEN WRONG INFORMATION. MY AIM GIVEN CORRECT INFORMATION.

[@ritzie_official_123]

I confirmed from numerical methods by srk iyengar ,R.K jain on page number 19 And another book whose name I don't know...and a local book too... On Google also...there are some PDFs available that show the same that it has linear order or convergence.... It's specially mentioned that among the three methods ,regula falsi has linear,secant has 1.6 and Newton raphson has quadratic rate of convergence My aim is just to save some other student's time which I wasted in clearing this thing out.

[@anjumalik24]

v long or messive😅

[@shuddhoshawttoroy6257]

Why the volume is so low, almost inaudible?

[@shehreyarahmad1677]

Sir I am sorry to say that your result is wrong. Regula Falsi method is linearly convergent. Its order of convergence is 1.

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

aap again check kar lo

[@shehreyarahmad1677]

Sir may nay check kia hai. Regula Falsi method linearly covergent hai. Aik research paper hai aap zar iss ko check krein. compmath-journal.org/dnload/Robin-Kumar-and-Vipan-/CMJV06I06P0290.pdf

[@anjumalik24]

@@AMMATHSTUTORIALS reply me plz 2 no m aaya to kitna karna hai

[@Roushankumar-ky1op]

Kuch jada work out ho gya

[@AMMATHSTUTORIALS]

yah proof hai time to lagega hi.