This was really informative its the period of the monarchy I always find confusing but you've really helped me understand it a lot better thanks as always Philippa
@RamonMarais-k2k3 ай бұрын
I am peed off with not being an Anglo Saxon anymore. So I am giving a thumbs up to every artical I come across about them.
@charlesmiv38423 ай бұрын
what do you mean "anymore"?
@theshamanarchist54413 ай бұрын
@@charlesmiv3842 Now the myth of Angles and Saxons has been debunked as hagiography.
@Saxondavid5 күн бұрын
@theshamanarchist5441 so your claiming the saxons and angles were and are not a people group in our own right ? So to push massmigration and the destruction of said people group they ate to be written out of history ?
@hugues-v8i2 күн бұрын
English is a simplified language. Try to learn to speak fluent German, Danish, Dutch, Icelandic, Swedish or Norwegian and you will understand how Old English, which ultimately shares the same origin as these languages, has been completely wrung out, cleaned, rinsed, patched up, re-tinted to make it a totally new language. Many thanks to the Vikings, the Normans and the Angevins! The simplification goes on, what with the spelling used in the USA, the influx of African, Asian, Spanish words into US English and the steady flow of slang words entering the language and giving it a much more lively colour than the fossilized tongue of the Royals of England or of the BBC, which sounds so pretentious and ridiculous. Listen to old British films from the 50s and how exotic the language is. English is alive, it's moving, it's transforming itself all the time. In a thousand years, if humanity still exists, it will be as different from today's language as Donald Trump's language is from the Old English spoken before the Norman conquest.
@KennethHall-tp4hw Жыл бұрын
Lucid and authoritative - just the Introduction I was looking for. Liked and Subscribed. : )
@BritishHistory Жыл бұрын
Thank you, and welcome 😀
@ShareTheJoyEverydayАй бұрын
🏴 🇬🇧 thank you. This was a great watch.
@EriAug78 Жыл бұрын
Love this! You made a confusing time very understandable
@BritishHistory Жыл бұрын
I’m so glad you found that. It is a complicated time, so that was my aim for this 😄
@h0ckeyd Жыл бұрын
Interesting how, even though it's on the map and the former name of the New Forest (Ntene - Jutish - Forest) people only mostly mention Kent or the Isle of Wight as lands settled by them but they actually held a fair bit of Southern Hampshire as well.
@BritishHistory Жыл бұрын
Love this, thank you.
@helgaborek3290 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video!
@BritishHistory Жыл бұрын
You’re so welcome Helga. Thank you for watching and leaving a comment 😊
@miahansson40064 ай бұрын
Very interesting, especially as I'm sitting with a recreation of a piece from this time on my lap right now. I'm working on a full-scale replica of The Bayeux Tapestry and I'll soon be completing the 48th metre. Should you fancy a chat about it, feel free to get in touch.
@ellag1323 Жыл бұрын
A banger of a video
@BritishHistory Жыл бұрын
Thank you! So glad you enjoyed it.
@georgefspicka548310 ай бұрын
Thank you : )
@rahjah6958 Жыл бұрын
3:35 the 1 thing the Scot’s always love to ignore lol. The entire reason their land was invaded was because of their raids in the first place
@silverhooligan12568 ай бұрын
Roman soldiers weren’t mostly from Rome, they were from all over the Roman Empire and locals were eventually brought in. Locals prior wouldn’t be kitted out with swords, shields and other armor. The average person before or after wouldn’t have formal armor. They’d have axes, staffs, and other practical tools for defense.
@BritishHistory8 ай бұрын
Yes, because to be Roman meant being a citizen of the Roman Empire, not that you were born in Rome.
@GarethPowell-n7n4 ай бұрын
Great video, thanks. I’m mainly British/Celt with a sprinkling of Anglo-Norse according to my genes and family! Do you know who would be classed as modern Anglo-Saxons in England today? For example what surnames? Thanks.
@theshamanarchist54413 ай бұрын
Celts are a religious fantasy people created by Welsh Norman Aristocracy and promoted by Puritan preachers. The idea was an 'ethno-nationalist' one based upon the 'myth' of a single pre Roman European language. This idea was successfully debunked many times over the centuries. No 'celts' ever lived in The British Isles. But every Germanic person living outside of An-Geal-Land(England) now claims to be one. Edward Llwyd (Lloyd) 1680.
@Æthelstān-thé-glørîøüs-964 ай бұрын
Anglo Saxon English and proud just how god made me 🏴✝️❤️💪🏻⚔️
@hugues-v8i4 күн бұрын
This morning while shaving I heard on the radio that with global warming and rising sea levels, three-quarters of England would be under water before the end of the century. If I were English, I would go back to bed straight away.
@GrandudchesstatiannaАй бұрын
Why is there no records of the time of the people who lived theirs graves or burials like they never lived in the villages or atleast to the public
@roberttreborable6 ай бұрын
It's Anglo Saxons that are criticised for later empire building and not Normans, probable as the kingdom is Anglo Saxon. although the Ruling Class are not Anglo Saxon.
@hugues-v8i2 күн бұрын
English is a simplified language. Try to learn to speak fluent German, Danish, Dutch, Icelandic, Swedish or Norwegian and you will understand how Old English, which ultimately shares the same origin as these languages, has been completely wrung out, cleaned, rinsed, patched up, re-tinted to make it a totally new language. Many thanks to the Vikings, the Normans and the Angevins! The simplification goes on, what with the spelling used in the USA, the influx of African, Asian, Spanish words into US English and the steady flow of slang words entering the language and giving it a much more lively colour than the fossilized tongue of the Royals of England or of the BBC, which sounds so pretentious and ridiculous. Listen to old British films from the 50s and how exotic the language is. English is alive, it's moving, it's transforming itself all the time. In a thousand years, if humanity still exists, it will be as different from today's language as Donald Trump's language is from the Old English spoken before the Norman conquest.
@jorgesantell72207 ай бұрын
Outstanding
@robinsinpost7 ай бұрын
"He then married one of his sisters." Whaaaaat?????? "to the Viking ruler of Yorvik." Phew........
@BSdetected10 ай бұрын
Damn… you jumped three centuries between Hengist and Horsa and great fred.
@BritishHistory10 ай бұрын
Thank you anonymous viewer
@silkwormandcottontails8039 ай бұрын
Ive never really understood much about this period so thank you for a great explanation . As usual nothing in our history is nice and simple , lots of names that take a while to sink in 😂
@BritishHistory9 ай бұрын
Lots! 😂
@wildernesswordsmith3 ай бұрын
I'm Anglo Saxon. Sir William of Garrington.
@tinysaxon38265 ай бұрын
One thing you are wrong about ! SHEPPY is not off the coast of Essex, it is in KENT ?
@Saxondavid5 күн бұрын
Yet some in england that love mass migration cliam we are not a people in our own right, we are and we have lived in this land for millenia
@scottscottsdale78689 ай бұрын
Very clearly done. I had no idea that the Romans prohibited Britons from owning weapons. It does kind of make our Second Amendment a bit more understandable. Lordy knows I am not a crazy gun nut though. But it makes it more clear why.
@theshamanarchist54413 ай бұрын
An-Geal-Land
@jacquelinevanderkooij43018 ай бұрын
And you forgot to name Edgar as a succesor to Edward the confessor. First choice, not crowned.
@BritishHistory8 ай бұрын
This is an ‘Introduction to…’ not a comprehensive guide to pre Norman Conquest England. Edgar Aethling as a great-nephew to Edward the Confessor had a blood claim however, he had no political or military power and, crucially, this is at a time when blood claim was not the primary consideration.
@ndie8075 Жыл бұрын
Saxons🇩🇪🇯🇪
@Bjowolf27 ай бұрын
Saxons were not Germans 😉
@ndie80757 ай бұрын
@@Bjowolf2 false.....the homeland of the germanic Saxons have been mainly in Westfalia , Lower Saxony, and Twente in the netherlands......Westfalia, Lower Saxony, Kent and Twente shares the Saxon Horse of their Flag.........the south of Germany has no germanic ancestry......
@Bjowolf27 ай бұрын
@@ndie8075 Yes, I know - but these Germanic peoples were not Germans - Germany didn't exist yet in any recogniseable form, you see. 😉 - and they did not speak (Old) German either.
@subutaykhan93877 ай бұрын
@@Bjowolf2 germanic people were not germans, but germans are grand children of the Germanic people . German Empire was formed in 1871 after German confederation led by prussia against Napolion's French empire. French empire is another germanic empire. And their traces goes back to 4th century unlike the german empire.
@Bjowolf27 ай бұрын
@@subutaykhan9387No, the Germans are just the descendants of SOME of the many Gemanic speaking tribes that lived all over North-Western Europe. Check out the brilliant video from Langfocus called "Viking Influence on the English Language" to see how English is formed by several Germanic influences at its core - and of course the many borrowed words from Normannnic, French & Latin.
@hugues-v8i2 күн бұрын
English is a simplified language. Try to learn to speak fluent German, Danish, Dutch, Icelandic, Swedish or Norwegian and you will understand how Old English, which ultimately shares the same origin as these languages, has been completely wrung out, cleaned, rinsed, patched up, re-tinted to make it a totally new language. Many thanks to the Vikings, the Normans and the Angevins! The simplification goes on, what with the spelling used in the USA, the influx of African, Asian, Spanish words into US English and the steady flow of slang words entering the language and giving it a much more lively colour than the fossilized tongue of the Royals of England or of the BBC, which sounds so pretentious and ridiculous. Listen to old British films from the 50s and how exotic the language is. English is alive, it's moving, it's transforming itself all the time. In a thousand years, if humanity still exists, it will be as different from today's language as Donald Trump's language is from the Old English spoken before the Norman conquest.
@markpirie19867 ай бұрын
❤😊🇬🇧
@2011minos7 ай бұрын
Angles and Saxons were Germans. They were not British. Normans were French. They were not British.
@Chebab-Chebab5 ай бұрын
The Normans were vikings by way of Normandy. France/Frankia was a separate entity.
@Mersey_basileus3 ай бұрын
They were Germanic not germans. Anglo Saxon is an English thing since they created England.
@hugues-v8i17 күн бұрын
@@Chebab-Chebab The Normans were French speaking Vikings because like modern Scandinavians they were gifted for languages, whereas the ordinary Saxon or Anglo sucked at French or Danish like your average modern Brit finds it impossible to pronounce anything but his own lingo.
@midwestmenace96364 ай бұрын
The replacement of paganism might've been more cordial at the time (considering the regular and usual barbarity), but looking back to the open mindedness that paganism brought to society; is missed. People used to interpret their own religions through their own thoughts, no different than their own realities. Compared to what your religion deemed as true, versus how you should think amongst a civil group of people in society. Christianity lives on, just like murder and conquest did. For a religion claiming the enlightenment and redemption of all, it did lead to a whole lot of destruction and conquest. Just like their pagan adversaries.
@midwestmenace96364 ай бұрын
ALSO, It might just be the human condition.
@DeanUSAman10 ай бұрын
🇬🇧
@jacquelinevanderkooij43018 ай бұрын
Very annoying that you forget to mention the Frisians. Old english and old frisian being the most equal languages and Frisians being the closest to England.
@BritishHistory8 ай бұрын
It was out of scope by some margin for an Introduction to Anglo Saxon England video.
@anothergodlessheathen Жыл бұрын
80 % of my own ancestry is of that "ethnic element", and these WERE " the Dark Ages" ... i.e., stupid Christian religiosity, illiteracy, ignorance, and gratuitous violence. But all of this pertained to most of Europe LOL.
@tyv588711 ай бұрын
Lindisfarne 793 were Norwegian..
@Bjowolf27 ай бұрын
She is wrong - they didn't come from Germany. It didn't exist yet 😉
@shahanarif42953 ай бұрын
You are brainwash English 😂😂 English have Celtic ancestry 😂😂
@Bjowolf23 ай бұрын
@@shahanarif4295 Only partially 😉 The Angles, Saxons, Frisians & Jutes came from present day NW Germany, SW Denmark / Jutland & Friesland, and they were related Germanic ( NB Not German! ) tribes, who spoke closely related and mutually intelligible accents of Germanic, which is why English is a Germanic language at its core with a lot of influence from Normanic, French & Latin on top of it of course, but only very borrowed words from Celtic languages - mostly just place names and local dialect words. No, I am not English 😂
@shahanarif42953 ай бұрын
@@Bjowolf2 hahaha you brainwash dumb Lol english dna is mostly Celtic which has dark hair and darker skin colours compared to Germans and Scandinavian countries and yes english are linguistic Germanic but only 30 percent anglo Saxon and you brainwash dumb😂😂 Anglo and Saxon were German and danish tribe you are living in delusional world 😂😂😂🤣😂😂
@AshHanks-nl5bn10 ай бұрын
Less than 30 seconds in up pops an advert & its time for me to go. Bye.