Anaphora of Mar Theodore - An Explanatory Note

[@dennysails3680]

Wonderful Acha But still most of the eparchies are not obeying synod😔

[@nildarose7056]

Thank you acha

[@manojp1684]

വളരെ നന്ദിയുണ്ട് അച്ചാ

[@Melvin_Thoma]

Thank you Acha👌

[@Paul-qe1jn]

My humble opinion would be to turn off the likes, comments section. KZbin comments section is universally notorious for breeding divisiveness. നന്ദി.

[@kunnelm6075]

The anaphora of Theodore is great .Such beautiful prayers are not there too much.Even after the institution prayers, at the end of the anaphora, there is a part in which there is a prayer to transform bread and wine to body and blood of Jesus.It may be redundant. Nestorian anaphora is also very good. But both these bishops were condemned for their heresies by the church. Nestorias in the Ephesus council and Theodore in the 2nd council in the constantinople. St.Thomas Aquinas in Summa Contra Gentiles devoted chapters refuting Nestorias and Theodore. Theodore wrote against Augustine and Cyril.Aquinas clearly establishes irrefutably the correct teaching. Father you study well.Your speech is not having depth.There is no heresy in the anaphora.They are super.At the same time they are bearing the names of 2 heretics

[@arun1math]

These anaphora was used st thomas christians before cruel latinisation inquisition process initiated by portugese..so don't teach syro malabar christians about heresy. Syro malabar follow East Syriac tradition our liturgy father is Mar Thoma an d his disciples Mar addai Mar mari, Mar theodor and Mar nestoriuos

[@vinilv1]

@@arun1mathNestorius died a condemned heretic. He was accused by a fellow antiochian bishop.

[@summersloth2899]

Mar Theodore died in peaceful communion with catholic church. Many church fathers have written against each other but that doesn't necessarily make them heretics. Most of St Aquinas's polemics against east were based on forgeries(he wasn't intentional but happened a lot in ancient times). Incase of Mar Theodore he was condemned by force from greeks centuries after his death without any condemnation of him during his life or 100s of years after his death lacking an approval by pope willfully since he was under house arrest of emperor Justinian (that too centuries later). Not to mention the same greeks schismed from Rome two centuries later after calling Roman catholics as heretics. Condemnation of Mar Theodore is almost the case with Pope Honorius who was condemned as a heretic by three ecuemenical councils but this was proven to be based on a misunderstanding of his letters. Now almost all roman catholic theologians and saints from mideval times consider Pope Honorius as someone who was orthodox in his theology.

[@rdevil5330]

These are two heretical liturgies. These were introduced into the Church of the East after Aba I. They were not present before that. The only clean Babylonian-Malabar liturgy is the liturgy of Mar Addai and Mar Mari. Both Theodore and Nestorius were heretics. There was a synod about westernization in the Church of the East. Westernization was adopted and more Antiochene elements were added in. Only the Malankara Church and those in communion are those saved. Yes, it is still possible to find a Malankara priest that does the East Syriac rite. The East Syriac rite fell into disuse by a Synod in 1885, but is not prohibited.

[@rdevil5330]

@@summersloth2899The Patriarch of Rome has been vacant since the repudiation of the Nicene creed by the Nestorian Council of Chalcedon.