Andrew Wilson Debates a Feminist | Egalitarianism Is Laughable!

[@AnthonyJ_]

She knows what he means, she just doesn’t want to give up her pride

[@devinplayseverything3764]

they mostly all do.

[@alpharella_ai]

It seems when it comes to pride, you could still learn something from a humble Christian. 😆

[@visible4850]

1000% she plays a dummie but she halfway through knows he has won the argument. Why can't women just look inward, be thankful that we leave in a peaceful society and ask how can we work together going forward rather than just argue and cause division. Goodness I can't stand these young women AND men that try and refute basic facts.

[@alpharella_ai]

@@visible4850 It is impossible for him to win the argument because he is fundamentally wrong 🙄

[@visible4850]

@@alpharella_ai Why is he fundamentally wrong? Do you even understand what that word means? His entire stance is men have the means to as a collective overthrow any "right" the population has which is correct. Men have been and will always will be the arbitrators of force.

[@blake-nw4pd]

These people do not have the mental capacity and/or ego to allow them to see the truth.

[@chainreaction8977]

What he said.^

[@moongoalie2410]

They never listen, only give this meek or slightly irritated stare to any counter argument given to them. Essentially they’re telling themselves that a man is just “mansplaining” to them again, or “they’re just misogynistic, I’m right”.

[@alpharella_ai]

I know how much Andrew is obsessed with using this argument to maintain the illusion of his superiority as a man, but it only reveals how little he understands the modern, civilized world. 1. The monopoly on violence lies with the state. That’s literally the hallmark of every modern, civilized society and a fundamental principle for the functioning of a legal state. Men just execute this force on behalf of and with the highly regulated authorization of institutions as paid employees - by the way, partly paid by women. 2. Physical force plays a small part in enforcing laws as a percentage; financial sanctions play the dominant role - and don’t you guys love just to talk about the majority 🤣. For example, in the whole business world, laws are enforced almost exclusively by financial sanctions and regulatory limitations. 3. Women are also part of the institutions that enforce laws, including in decision-making positions. I’m pretty sure by the time a female judge fines you $100,000, you will realize that power doesn’t require physical force. And Andrew, please describe in detail what you have NEVER explained in any discussion (and I analyzed the transcripts of every available discussion with Andrew on KZbin): how would this magic get-together of men happen in the real world? • Is this a group inside the police and simultaneously the military? • Is the FBI also involved? • Is this finally bringing together Republican and Democratic men? • How is the ideology of reducing women’s rights developing from being statistically irrelevant in a very limited echo chamber to such a broad, burning topic? • Are the men involved leaving their wives before doing this big coup? Or were they all incels in the first place? • Is this all really with the ultimate goal of stripping women of their rights? Seriously? OR Is this all just a weird hypothetical with no relevance to reality, apart from revealing the wet dreams of its creator?

[@chainreaction8977]

@@alpharella_ai Who makes the 'modern civilized world' civilized? Men. Who enacts state violence? Men. There's just no point with some women. Their inability to accept reality and behave accordingly just makes them a toxic waste of time. Whatever, good luck.

[@robertmcdougall1144]

​@@alpharella_ai *"The monopoly on violence lies with the state."* Your entire argument fell apart when you realised that it's men who are "the state". *"I’m pretty sure by the time a female judge fines you $100,000, you will realize that power doesn’t require physical force."* And what if I don't pay said fines? Is that female judge going to restrain me? or do they send a group of armed men who will physically restrain me and put me in a box guarded by... more armed men? lel It is almost like you need some form of "might" to be able to have a functioning society, which men excel at. Who would have thought? (sarcasm). Thank you for skirting around Andrew's entire argument... maybe you shouldn't rely on AI producing your argument. GG. lmao

[@Itsmy2cent]

Can we please all flood Piers Morgan that Andrew needs to be on his show often…..especially when Destiny is on to rebuff Destinys BS

[@thomassantos93]

I want to see a 2v2 best of the best Andrew Wilson & Rob Noerr vs Destiny & Pisco. Make it happen on Piers Morgan

[@akaDoodleBob]

Destiny is such a turd

[@dabewagner1247]

Pisco & Density are NOT the best that the left has…

[@IhaveNoPatienceForIdiotsAndLia]

"especially when Destiny is on to rebuff Destinys BS" That makes no sense unless you're trying to say that Destiny spends a lot of time amending what he has said in the past.

[@SpaklesDr]

Piers is too stupid to understand Andrew's points.

[@TheWrathfulSlayer]

Farha Khalifa!!😂😂😂 she got destroyed on her view of egalitarianism!!

[@alpharella_ai]

You mean by the judgment of this very limited and statistically irrelevant echo chamber or the judgment of the outside, real world - or as you love to call it, “the majority”? 🤔🤯🥴🤣🤣🤣

[@alpharella_ai]

​@real_ArnoldPalmer What are you talking about? I did a whole video debunking his fantasy of stripping women of their rights. Do you want me to list where he’s fundamentally wrong?

[@gwyn1056]

@@alpharella_ai Yes. Please do.

[@lawrencemcstephens308]

Her last name is Khalidi, not Khalifa.

[@TheWrathfulSlayer]

@@lawrencemcstephens308 it’s a joke brother! Remember Mia Khalifa who she kinda looks like and is also Muslim like Mia Khalifa

[@the98themperoroftheholybri33]

Rights come from magic pixies and elves, feminists told me

[@chainreaction8977]

lol

[@alpharella_ai]

Yes - our institutions are really magical

[@Mr-Host]

​​​@@alpharella_ai who are mostly run by men? Who are paid by mostly other men who made those laws? Oh wait im sorry vampires?

[@romansidiropoulos7033]

-Rights dont exist. -Yes they do -Then where do they come from? -I dont know. Debate ended in first minute

[@etopsch369]

In a democracy they do

[@MrArbaras]

@@etopsch369 How?

[@romansidiropoulos7033]

@@etopsch369 Ok, so where do they come from?

[@etopsch369]

@@romansidiropoulos7033 society, laws, government

[@romansidiropoulos7033]

@@etopsch369 So you are just taking wild guesses there? Could you be any more generic? Ok lets try this. Can you explain how rights are enforced absent human mind? Do you have any rights absent other people protecting those rights for you? If not , can you point at a right at least? You can record music. You can see oxygen in a microscope and you can measure gravity. Can you measure rights? Can you see em? Can you touch them? There problem is that you are having a hard time separating reality from your mind. There are things that are real and there are things that are social constructions that dont exist absent the human mind.

[@spaceranger7683]

She's not grasping that laws are just words on paper. They mean nothing if someone with superior force decides not to abide by them; unless a greater force than the offender is able and willing to intervene to enforce those laws. To use feminists' favorite example, rape, no rape in history has ever been cut short by a woman holding up a piece of paper and shouting "you aren't allowed to do this!" They are stopped, however, when a cop or a man with a baseball bat comes over and puts an end to it.

[@AnimalAlmighty]

We need to stop saving them. They are strong and independent and equal to men so they can defend themselves 😂

[@pddaawwgg]

Arguing back with facts is way different then just arguing back. She's pathetic.

[@etopsch369]

No, he is because those are not facts.

[@kinggrizzly13]

@@etopsch369you must be deaf or never bothered listening to this. Lol

[@pddaawwgg]

@@etopsch369 Then debunk any of his facts in this video for us.

[@Ken-ck4zn]

@@etopsch369, ok, honey.

[@madmardagan2059]

She seemed a lot smarter when she was on Whatever. She was still wrong but at least she could hang in the conversation better in that setting.

[@Arez455]

nah, Idk what you're talking about. The same level of stupid was manifest there and it is here as well. Period.

[@GlynnParry-bs6xg]

She 'hid' in the noise of other guests, and utilises a favourite Destiny tactic, generate so many hypothesis that no one notices you skipped the question.😮

[@pikengren1]

She seems more honest in engaging with what someone is actually saying than many of the others.

[@dmac8207]

So glad I found this channel! Andrew is quickly becoming my go to when opening KZbin. Damn I love people who live in reality.

[@markclum7497]

Except he's not in reality, he makes claims he can't really back up, more so on opinion and theatrics as opposed to facts.

[@laserlobotomy]

​@@markclum7497Care to provide an example?

[@markclum7497]

@@laserlobotomy sure removing all women from the workforce would increase all men's income and lower prices. If you want I will explain will this is obviously false and claim he made.

[@a.b3203]

​@@markclum7497did he really say that, or is that an unfair caricature from a Destiny fan? Hmm, I wonder.

[@markclum7497]

@@a.b3203 he said it verbatim, not sure what destiny has tondonwith anything said by wilson, sounds like coping to me.

[@Unordinary-lg4yt]

Watched this debate like 5 times already. Most XX think just because you CAN do something liberally that it means it’s an inherent right. Not so. This idea of inherent rights is laughable. It requires enforcement at all times - society has gotten far too comfortable with forgetting the ambient law enforcement and institutions actively enforcing them.

[@jimhellwig8615]

Damn! Strong post!

[@metaljacket8128]

Andrew spot-on again

[@etopsch369]

wrong in every aspect

[@Mr-Host]

@@etopsch369 how?

[@etopsch369]

@@Mr-Host like I said. In every respect

[@Mr-Host]

@@etopsch369 then prove it

[@etopsch369]

@@Mr-Host “women can’t be equal unless men allow them to be equal” ???? Well, how does that work because our supreme court ( not USA, although there are women there as well) is made up more than 50% women. Andrew thinks that police enforce the rules, which is irrelevant and women are there as well. Like it or not. Police force is more important in totalitarian regimes but I hope we’re not talking about that. I can go on and on. By his own logic his rights depend on men as well, because doing a podcast is hardly a masculine job.

[@Neon-jn3sp]

It's inarguable. No matter what, the final line always comes down to who has more physical strength. Maybe if we made all women into cyborgs which were then stronger than men for no other reason than Men decided that they are sick of having control.

[@etopsch369]

Maybe in the USA, not in civilized countries

[@gellisse]

Even then, I'd still put my money on a collective group of men in battle and wartime scenarios than cybernetically enhanced women. Men can cooperate to get the job done far more effectively under those circumstances from what I've seen and experienced.

[@alpharella_ai]

@@etopsch369 Great comment 🥰 Slapping Red Pill & the US

[@etopsch369]

@@gellisse you guys are always at war. Not good at anything else

[@Payseur]

@@etopsch369Who enforces penalties in civilised societies for violation of laws?

[@DullGukat]

Why's Alex always so wrecked?

[@MrGodgivemeaname]

He has that "just f*** my sh*t up" hairstyle.

[@akaDoodleBob]

@@MrGodgivemeanamethat’s not a hair style. That’s just a lack of hair 😅

[@bullthatsalive9111]

I always wonder if he just looks that way or is he high as F...

[@akaDoodleBob]

@@bullthatsalive9111 both hahah

[@Necroverse19]

Temu Khalifa is back.

[@alpharella_ai]

What a Shein-quality statement 🙄

[@Necroverse19]

@@alpharella_ai Your Wish sense of humor seems to be on the fritz.

[@JapChaeJan]

Why are we giving OF models the light of day?

[@FourthExile]

Yeah I find these debates kind of futile as the OF models will just keep endlessly justifying their actions or at least talk their way around responsibility in order to have their cake and eat it too.

[@etopsch369]

why are we giving idiots like Wilson, Tate and Myron the light of day???

[@TheLucidSpecter]

That's what I've been wondering. They're pathetic. Clout chasing is a thing, so there's that. Sadly, our society looks up to degenerates like her.

[@gordonmorgan6298]

It's not for them, it's for the ones not lost yet

[@emjayy1233]

bro on the bottom is GEEKED out of his mind

[@jonnyblaze4486]

Now im just watching him lol good one

[@dinobullet]

I’m not even a conservative I just enjoy how well Andrew debates and how calm (for the most part) he logically states his argument.

[@etopsch369]

its not logic

[@kinggrizzly13]

@@etopsch369yes Andrew is.

[@etopsch369]

@@kinggrizzly13 nope

[@kinggrizzly13]

@@etopsch369 I bet you still wear a face diaper in public. LOL

[@kinggrizzly13]

@@etopsch369 yes

[@ExcelSeñor]

People (men) still have to enforce the rights of the unborn. Men could decide the unborn don’t have any rights or they could decide that they do. But in the event that they do, men will still have to enforce it.

[@markclum7497]

Not true, because women could take action to toncarry to term.

[@shane-bl4jk]

​@@markclum7497....they don't posses the ability to create force....not strong enough.....10 wemon could not enforce anything on two men, two men can and do through force allow rights to exist.....

[@CdrRogdan]

@@markclum7497 That's highly unlikely if abortion carried a murder charge. Women would carry the child to term if the result of doing otherwise was a lifetime jail sentence, or even the death penalty.

[@markclum7497]

@@CdrRogdan not at all, so you're saying that rape would be legal, and men could force women to get pregnant? Seems like a great world, with a lot of desirable outcomes. If that's the case womwn would have abortions in mass

[@CdrRogdan]

@@markclum7497 What on earth does making rape legal have to do with abortions? Also if women want to acquire mass murder charges, so be it. It would certainly weed out all the bad ones.

[@Rundvelt]

This is a perfect example of how women think. They have their feelings and go "oh, that's good enough" and don't go further. You see it here. She knows that it's not violence that maintains rights, but doesn't know what the actual factor is.

[@Ajas0810]

She’s 100 percent wrong and Andrew is right. However she is a better thinker than the other women on whatever.

[@etopsch369]

Andrew is wrong and society proves it. Oh. I dont mean american society

[@donalfoley2412]

Basically rights won’t be respected unless they are backed up by force. That does not mean that the strong are right because they are strong. The strong are right when they fight for justice, and wrong when they fight against it. Whether they succeed or not will make a great difference but will not change what is right or wrong. Those who say otherwise betray a fatal weakness in their powers of reason, pace Neitzche.

[@jake45790]

I’m embarrassed for her 😬

[@etopsch369]

thought the same about him

[@jake45790]

@@etopsch369 lol no kidding and how is that? I’d love to hear how you’re “embarrassed for Andrew”. I’m sure whatever it is, will be highly logical.

[@etopsch369]

@@jake45790 that’s easy. His arguments are illogical and not true. We live in a society and not in the Middle Ages.

[@jake45790]

@@etopsch369 🤣😂🤣 well now that’s a solid argument right there champ 👍

[@etopsch369]

@@jake45790 just like yours. My lectures cost extra

[@Mmane_223]

The fact that this is even a debate is crazy in itself lol

[@KaneGregory]

The way Andrew smokes on those poles he ain’t enforcing nothing!🚬🤕🥊

[@xThe_Wendigo]

Farha’s kidnapping hypothetical is flawed. If two men and three women were to kidnap me, I still have the ability to appeal to my rights by calling the police, I would just need the opportunity to. Now if she’s saying in this hypothetical world that no police existed then no I wouldn’t have the ability to appeal to my rights because I wouldn’t have any.

[@EskiLdn]

Unless men came to enforce your human rights

[@alexp2557]

This was the debate that got me to love Andrew Wilson

[@etopsch369]

go back to school. Wilson is so stupid, it hurts

[@alpharella_ai]

Well, delusion always plays a big part in true romance. 🥰

[@alexp2557]

@@alpharella_ai you seem more obsessed than I am

[@alpharella_ai]

@@alexp2557 You might have a point there 😉 although I would argue it’s determination

[@Mr-Host]

​@@alpharella_ai planning on debating him soon?

[@lancekotter927]

She definitely understood Andrew, she just wanted to question dodge so she could think of a way out.

[@Makala_Zernesto]

The moderator almost fell asleep, either he was sleepy or dense

[@Makala_Zernesto]

Kant said the freedom of on individual ends there where the freedom of another begins, maybe this gives you some inspiration

[@Hryblzonyaa]

Very well put.

[@Chris.Rhodes]

9:35 It really annoys me when someone fakes taking a drink.

[@beneficent2557]

If "rights" are subjective, then what is owed is a matter of leverage.

[@Spartacus484]

As women enter the judicial and political system, could they control society by controlling the laws?

[@RobertCuillo]

Andrew really is good. There is no denying it

[@nightwingvyse]

I agree that egalitarianism has to be "allowed" in a sense, but I still don't see why it's a ridiculous concept. If we were talking about equity that would be a very different story as that's a disastrous and unfair notion. Egalitarianism simply means that everyone has equal opportunities (which is NOT the same as equal outcomes which would be equity), and when everyone has equal opportunity it means everyone has a shot at what they want to do. If they're good at it they succeed, if they're bad at it they fail, and the very best at it are the most successful. To give everyone an equal opportunity actually maximizes the possible competence in a pool of candidates or whatever else we're talking about, without any DEI nonsense. Everybody at least has the opportunities available to them, and then we let the chips fall where they may in regards to who is the most productive at it, and the proportions of which demographics are the most successful is irrelevant. If a woman wants to be an engineer or a man wants to be a nurse etc, then let them have the opportunity to compete in the field. If they're competent then they'll succeed and if they're not they'll fail.

[@Sean-e5r]

This woman is lost and prideful because she thinks to minimize the governmental purposes of the strength of men God gave us.

[@mathewlanier8352]

That last example made me chuckle lol Got’eem

[@user-im8vn8ye9o]

Ah. Never fails. Whenever farha gets chewed up in a debate, she always says “just because I can’t prove my point doesn’t mean I’m wrong.” She does it every time, and she just did it again at about 5:05

[@charlestruppi7793]

The fact that this is such a difficult concept for her to comprehend tells you everything you need to know about her. Look at Afghanistan. Taliban in, women have no rights. US coalition gets rid of Taliban, women magically have rights. US leaves and Taliban steps back in, women’s rights once again go away. Neither the Taliban, nor the US forces represent a small majority of general Afghan population, yet these small groups of men literally hold the everyday lives of women in the palm of their hands.

[@AdamRabczuk]

Her counterexample with right to life of infant is actually a logical fallacy. By the same token that women rights are not equal to men rights, the infant rights are not equal to men rights either. She is trying to disprove the origin of rights by giving an example of a particular right. One has nothing to do with the other. We can debate what rights and policies are right or wrong, but it has nothing to do with what those rights will be predicated on.

[@strategic1710]

My favorite clip of this chic is when she reads the graph wrong with Michael Knowles and then argues with conviction against his point because it confirms what she believes. He laughs like he’s talking to an ignorant child and then teaches her how to read a chart.

[@Sean-e5r]

No one would fear God if he did not have enough power to punish or curse them for practicing disobedience.

[@jreas_]

This can also be seen in the nature of women. Notice how it is typically a women who makes an appeals to authority. If in a argument the first thing they will ask is what education do you have. That in itself is a appeal to authority.

[@kaykay865]

It's mia khalifa

[@VexDrive]

Temu Khalifa

[@AnimalAlmighty]

Mia Khalifa from Shein

[@PsycoMouse]

Great Value Mia

[@robertmcdougall1144]

One is from McDonald and the other is from Burger King. They are both mid-tier-looking women.

[@OptientGaming]

Very polite discussion

[@PuddleToad]

A modern day example of men enforcing power right now is in Afghanistan, with teenage girls education and schooling. When the Taliban men came back into power they stop any teenage girl going to school and the women couldn't do anything about it. The question to this woman would be what could they do and why haven't be able to do anything since September 2021? Surely if women had the right before they could just take it back, what's stopping them?

[@socrates1954]

Andrew 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ thats not begging the question. That's her just obsfucating the point. She didn't answer the question by using the question, she dodged and reframed it. Stupid and logically remedial but not begging the question. When the left say " a woman is a woman" to the question "what is a woman?" that is begging the question.....and a pointless tautology.

[@juanvaldez5422]

I guarantee the glasses are fake

[@NordicVigilante]

Yep we all know that

[@ch3nz3n]

It's quite ironic how a person named "Farha Khalidi" doesn't understand how rights are given or taken away by violence. Islam been doing that since for...ever.

[@methylmike]

Only a child hasn't worked this logic out Sad

[@alpharella_ai]

A child, and Andrew

[@rudycastillo4150]

"The giver " movies is good example

[@Lolatyou332]

@8:00 Why is she saying this? Does she not realize that it would not only require someone to do it it would require the entire justice system to allow them to do it without consequence.. Anyone can murder but they will be punished for it.. Men will not just let women kill men because they don't like them.

[@nathanc30]

I wish Andrew would debate hoff summers or someone on his level and age

[@WilliamEllison]

She is so blessed.

[@premodernprejudices3027]

Andrew is the man!

[@Gruff338]

Rights come from who can defend them and enforce them

[@chrisolson84]

jfc this woman. It's called "Law Enforcement" for a reason. You don't just make laws and expect everyone to follow them. You have to ENFORCE them.

[@pchris6662]

She tried. Just can’t connect the dots. Too bad that education didnt teach her how to think as much as it taught her WHAT to think.

[@Micloren]

"Can you point to a country in history where women have collectively over thrown tyranny with force?" = Mic Drop

[@BadgerUKvideo]

It's a silly point though. Men are a lot softer these days. There are even countries where men are expected to use guns in lieu of learning self defence. You've even got some countries that wear full suits of armour to play rugby. I'm not saying all men are that soft but the country to which I referred is considered a top 50 country in some metrics.

[@GaJiarg]

​@BadgerUKvideo men being weaker now has nothing to do with the question though.

[@BadgerUKvideo]

@@GaJiarg If men were stronger in history then there would be more cases of a country's men overthrowing a tyranny by force.

[@Micloren]

@@BadgerUKvideo Nothing you said refutes his point. The best counter argument would be that women are master manipulators of men & can get men to fight entire wars for a chance to bed them. Meaning men being stronger is outweighed by women getting what they want & more by co-opting men thru wit & sexuality.

[@AnimalAlmighty]

@@BadgerUKvideoThe weakest men will still dominate the strouof females. They will always be at our mercy.

[@fluctuator9424]

Ask most middle eastern females if they think they are equal. Then when they say no, ask them why they aren't doing something about it.

[@sammygoodnight]

I've always said that f***nism was just like me going up to Lebron James and saying, "I'm just as good a basketball player as you, you just never let me win."

[@Pvt_Parts404]

Playing Devils Advocate Here: Wouldn't the correct response would be to fight back on how we don't only use men to enforce laws but women too? You dont have to be strong to subdue another just have the right tools and if the argument what will you do without the tools occurs dismiss it because that scenario doesnt exist in this day and age.

[@TheRox0923]

She still is trying to debate Andrew? Lol

[@kingjaydex7464]

It’s an old debate

[@ianmoore7378]

What happens when robotics are good enough they start being used as the enforcement arm?

[@alpharella_ai]

Love that argument 👌

[@Skotti2hotti]

This was a breath of fresh air ina world of 304s 😂🙋🏾‍♂️

[@alexdesimone6924]

You are very good at debating, VERY good

[@alpharella_ai]

I agree - Farha is really smart and, most importantly, her arguments are based on reality.

[@alexdesimone6924]

@@alpharella_aiI’m obviously talking about him, not her

[@moongoalie2410]

@@alpharella_aistill upset that Steven didn’t do so well?

[@roarkkaufman9339]

Obviously Farha has no basis for rights because she denies metaphysical reality. Andrew do you deny objective human rights? We clearly have at least a few granted by God in the scriptures and shown to us through His church.

[@bryangormann214]

Which ones does god grant you again

[@hermonymusofsparta]

The "rights" in the Constitution and Bill of Rights are man made. Just because the Founding fathers said they were God given doesn't mean they were. It would only matter if they got them from the Bible which they didn't. Romans 13 and 1 Pe 2 are very clear on this. God appoints governments and Christians are supposed to obey unless they tell you to do something sinful (Acts 5). If for example, the United States were to revoke the second amendment, as a Christian you wouldn't have a scriptural or moral right to rebel because God only gave you the right to bear arms so long as the government allowed it.

[@roarkkaufman9339]

@bryangormann214 Well obviously the right to Life as it is commanded we do not murder. We also have the right to worship God. These are not all of them but we see this evident in scripture

[@roarkkaufman9339]

@@hermonymusofsparta Sure, but that's not my argument. I'm just saying rights exist

[@kurt.wilkinsongardendesign]

A smart, intelligent, modern women lost and confused by logic, lol

[@christopherfleming7505]

Rights come from God. Andrew knows this, as he is Eastern Orthodox. However, his tactic in this debate is to take the feminist's liberal premise, that rights are merely arbitrary things people decide on and turn into laws, and use it against her. Her atheism is so strong that she refused to even mention that rights are from God, and therefore she soundly lost the argument.

[@loganblackwood2922]

From an atheist perspective, she would still have to admit that from a biological perspective she is ill-equipped to enforce her own rights and that those rights are only guarantees based on male permission and enforcement. Remove God and she actually has no divine commandment to hold men to any standard regarding whether men abide by her principles. Weakening her position even further.

[@hermonymusofsparta]

The Bible doesn't say anything about God-given rights like those given in the US Constitution or Bill of Rights. Just because you say they are God given doesn't mean they are.

[@christopherfleming7505]

@@hermonymusofsparta If you look at history, you will see that the notion of rights grew out of the Christian theological tradition. It took many centuries to form this consciousness, but it undoubtedly arose from Christendom. That is why Christians led the charge to abolish slavery, why the notion of human rights flourished in the West. There are certainly many false human rights, championed by freemasons, but the concept of rights is a Christian one, and it was generally understood that these rights were endowed upon human beings by God, our Creator.

[@Mr-Host]

​​@@christopherfleming7505 we have about 1 right, free will, ofc its not even really a right because what you do carries consequences on earth and in the presence of God

[@christopherfleming7505]

@@Mr-Host We have the right to life, because God called us into existence and gave us a soul. We have the right to worship Him in the way He wishes.

[@jjr8108]

She is so dead inside 😂

[@myasbias7517]

how many times can you force someone to watch lord of the flies until they understand basic enforcement of society.

[@alpharella_ai]

Maybe someone should force you to watch it again and finally understand it. ‘Lord of the Flies’ literally shows what happens if a society falls back into an uncivilized state. But modern Western states have reached a very robust level of civilization that is basically irreversible except for weird hypotheticals. 1. The monopoly on violence lies with the state. That’s literally the hallmark of every modern, civilized society and a fundamental principle for the functioning of a legal state. Men just execute this force on behalf of and with the highly regulated authorization of institutions as paid employees - by the way, partly paid by women. 2. Physical force plays a small part in enforcing laws as a percentage; financial sanctions play the dominant role - and don’t you guys love just to talk about the majority 🤣. For example, in the whole business world, laws are enforced almost exclusively by financial sanctions and regulatory limitations. 3. Women are also part of the institutions that enforce laws, including in decision-making positions.

[@petersouthernboy6327]

Mia Khalifa rip-off on OF is the best she can do? Logic isn’t her strong suit.

[@akaDoodleBob]

Hahah dude isn’t even drinking anything from his cup

[@JP.Travelz]

I love a lot of what Andrew says … but smoking as a personality trait is lame

[@ionuorah]

Lil surprising to see Farha not talk fast

[@jammer212]

the way she is sitting there is so corny😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.

[@Makala_Zernesto]

Matriarch societies actually exist, I think its mostly or exclusively nomad societies

[@alldayscapegoat]

Women can’t. When will we as a society stop pretending they can?

[@musicformindmfm5351]

i feel for that girl. bad parenting

[@jamessteckel5379]

Mid kalifah highlight lets goooo

[@madenwilson7561]

Sooooo eagalitariannism has nothing to do with Eagles then?

[@ElStinkyPinky]

Farah, arguing for the sake of argument doesn’t make you intelligent, it makes you an echolalian.

[@BalthasarCarduelis]

Rights come from God. Rights are justice owed without any transaction between the parties. Men cannot justly take away what is owed to women by right just as women cannot justly take away what is owed to children by right. Each of these can unjustly take away what is owed to the weaker by right, but that's primal injustice. Maybe she'll appeal to God to enforce her rights if you bully her hard enough (because if might makes right then Almighty makes alrighty), but that'll take a lot of humility because that comes with hierarchy and the recognition that rights aren't equal (given the inequality of hierarchy); but if she never clues in like that, then all she'll take away from this buwwying is that baby's rights come from mommy because she can enforce them.

[@edwardgrunder5628]

The answer is simple .. Men and women are made in the image God our rights come from God .. is Andrew suggesting we act against the Will of God ?

[@durpydurp7853]

The look on this chicks face haha

[@p3zzzz]

Wasnt this the sane girl that came out and said that the DNC was paying her to make content to push their narative?

[@Lolatyou332]

The girl is literally Temu Mia Khalifa..

[@chriswalsh6893]

I hate how cute she is…..

[@ryanlerouche5122]

I only believe in biblical egalitarianism. Where both men and women are made equal to GOD. And the both have different virtues that are supposed to complement each other in a cooperation system. But ultimately the double edge sword of the male strength virtue can take away women freedom at any time.

[@josephposenecker9741]

It’s painful to listen to.

[@medoz7331]

this gal has a huge ego

[@steves1584]

Rights come from God. However, the enforcement arm of these rights, be it a minority of men, does not invalidate an existence of this idea. What's Andrew's point? He seems to say that since (a minority of) men enforce rights, that women are beholden to men. Fine. But that's also true for men. Most men are beholden to a minority of men to enforce these rights as well. We tell a story that's more powerful than force. That people (men and women) ought to be protected by the forceful few. Andrew believes in stories. So do I. You could just as easily say that the power of enforcement of rights comes down to who (or what) convinces the minority of men to act. In some cultures, it's been brutes that have told a better story. In our culture, by the grace of God, it's an appeal to a transcendent truth that has convinced the minority of violent men to protect a truth that is more important. That all people are created in the image of God. It seems to me that he wields this argument to win against women. It seems unwise. Good day, God bless.

[@funicon3689]

farhad is the worst

[@etopsch369]

Andrew Wilson makes no sense at all. He live in a world of his own.

[@alpharella_ai]

The Monarch in the Kingdom of Stupidity 🤴

[@skyleranderson5757]

damn when did mia get less brains

[@NordicVigilante]

She never had them neither did farha shes fake

[@Sean-e5r]

Go and use this argument that Andrew is using in a pro egalitarian church of religious leaders that think it is good with the Lord Jesus Christ to let women be pastors, or bishops, or deaconesses.

[@rafmatt1607]

So this is the femoil destiny?

[@Escaped-FromHellview]

Bottom window moderator, fade out man ur all zoomed in taking focus off the debate with ur reactions and male pattern baldness 😂

[@CrucialFlowResearch]

This dude doesn't understand that there are inalienable rights. The government does not grant rights, rather it's not allowed to violate rights. The bill of rights is stated as being self evident. As for man/woman, yes men are more powerful on average.

[@AnimalAlmighty]

What does a right look like or smell like?