Is McIntosh WORTH THE MONEY? McIntosh Review!! MAC7200 Stereo Receiver

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

🔥Thanks to Keeps for supporting the channel! For more info: keeps.com/AndrewRobinson ✅ *GET THE MAC HERE: **bit.ly/3Gm2z86* ★ *QOTD: What’s the best McIntosh amp ever made? Is the brand deserving of its audiophile praise?* ★ *RULES: Please be respectful. NO OUTSIDE LINKS, URLs, email addresses, etc.*

[@feedbackelectronics]

♥️💝💘👍💘💝♥️ 🔊India🇮🇳Kerala🔊

[@pierre-philippejulien6298]

I know McIntosh is well known for quality and their tube amps . I just ordered the ma252 , this will be my first Mac . Hopefully it’ll will match my Bowers and Wilkins 702 s2 .

[@pierre-philippejulien6298]

Andrew , will you pair this amp with the 702 s2 signature? I know those are very difficult speaker and having the right amp to create synergy is a must.

[@chrisblock6697]

MC3500 (original) - just because of its Woodstock heritage. The Mac Amp Jerry Garcia used (MC2300) and the Grateful Dead used for the Wall of Sound comes in a close second.

[@KristiWright]

@@pierre-philippejulien6298 Not Andrew but this amp would likely a great pairing. As for the MA252, not sure that would be a good pairing based on the power/ohm performance.

[@dont4450]

I have a Macintosh Ma6100 amp bought in 1974 for 649.00. It is still in daily use today, handles high resolution music files with ease, and HAS NEVER BEEN SERVICED. YES, MACS ARE WORTH EVERY PENNY

[@marcsmithsonian9773]

So is 1978 my grandmother $99 stereo from Sears.

[@marcsmithsonian9773]

You dond judge Chevy for what they make in 70's.

[@electrolytics]

Oh really? An amp you bought in 1974 handles Hi-Res music files? That's interesting.....

[@dont4450]

@@electrolytics easily. I hook up my astell&kern kann alpha to it and it's pure joy.

[@IsleOfFeldspar]

How can the original capacitors last so long?

[@pf5658]

I could care less about all the negative comments about McIntosh. I love my McIntosh system and, “ You’ll have tear it away from my cold dead hands.” Best money I’ve ever spent.

[@ChickenPermissionOG]

bias you will not hear the difference between a mac and cheaper good amp unless you are a dog. Spending money on things you physically can not hear is a waste.

[@pf5658]

@@ChickenPermissionOG Your opinion. It’s not a waste when one spends their hard earned money on something they wanted and enjoy on a daily basis.Besides I said I love my McIntosh system. Never made any claim as to what brand of amps sounds better or don’t.

[@ChickenPermissionOG]

@@pf5658 never said they could spend their money on things they can not hear but go ahead and put more words in my mouth. Never said you did.

[@mzondi1970]

I've been wanting one forever. Regardless of what people say sound is very subjective people that love Macintosh and the way they sound you're not going 2 Change on mind. I haven't heard a product better sounding at the price range the only things I've ever heard better is if you get into something like a very high amp like one of the old Mark Levinson or D'Agostino. I honestly don't hold this guy's opinions very highly anyway he also didn't like the way my Bowers and Wilkins sound either

[@ChickenPermissionOG]

@@mzondi1970 no clue who you even are. You want to was money on circuitry that you can not physically hear more power to you, but you know that old saying a fool and their money.

[@arobinson22833]

Hi Andrew, as a proud owner of the MAC7200 I was happy and surprised to see your review of McIntosh equipment. Over the 40 years that been into audio equipment I’ve owned all types of high end (Audio Research, Bryston, Conrad Johnson, Krell, Meridian, Peachtree Audio, and several others) amplifiers. However, I can truly say that the MAC7200 is the best sounding Integrated Amplifier that I’ve ever owned. Like you I also own the Klipsch Forte IV and the MAC7200 takes their sound to another level. But it wasn’t until last night when I decided to hook up the MAC7200 to an older pair Martin Logan’s that I realized it’s a very special piece of audio equipment!!! Yes the MAC7200 is big/heavy and expensive but it’s worth every penny. Also, the less expensive MA5300 is great sounding Integrated Amplifier. Lastly, McIntosh is probably the only audio equipment that holds its value and in some cases appreciates over the years. Thanks again for you and Kristi’s great reviews. Anthony

[@grandmasteraj855]

Imagine buying this thing to LISTEN TO FM RADIO.

[@Darrylizer1]

Your comment made me laugh. I've been thinking that very thing. I'd prefer the MA7200 integrated amp myself as I do no radio listening outside of my car.

[@stevenmcbride2776]

Nice equipment out there now,just need some musicians making some music,get tired of listening to old music

[@roderickstevens6891]

Imagine buying this beast to listen to anything,oh mummy yes,yes,yes!

[@CL-yp1bs]

I almost cried when I heard FM radio!

[@alexsajkovic9403]

Yes ‼️ 🎶📺 currently using Bluesound NODE thru McIntosh MC162 for local KPOO KALW KALX. 7200 will be much better than iNet... Then M10v2 for Tidal etc. 📺🎸😜🙋

[@timkampmann3423]

Mr. Robinson is one of the best reviewers on YOU TUBE . His easy going style with a way of reporting the information one wants in a product. So glad I found the channel .. .

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Thank you so much Tim. We're glad you found us too!

[@FactbasedReality0421]

Let's face it. It's a quality brand for people who have money. Probably 75% love it and can afford it/justify it and 25% want bragging rights. All high end brands are like this. I wanted it when I was 14. At 58, I can easily afford it, but now think it is a vanity buy, as I cannot detect the difference other than "feel". Midwest practical in me would rather get really good at much less cost..... For anyone mature, pass no judgement, buy what you can afford and what makes YOU happy. If you can hear the difference, truly hear it, you are gifted. For the rest of us, buy what sounds good for the buck, spend the remaining on other hobbies.....

[@SuppressiveSquirrel]

Agree. It’s more of a legacy status piece now and Gen Z etc couldn’t give a shit less about McIntosh. It’s like a Rolex. Classic time piece but a digital watch doesn’t need to be wound or rotated and keeps more accurate time than the Rolex. Same with McIntosh. There’s better for cheaper.

[@ralex3697]

There is a lot better gear out there for less money.

[@13xBlackSun]

Name one, that has all the safety features for not burning up your speakers Mc gear has and I will seriously consider it.

[@GrindCityGuitars]

I think an interesting comparison to the 7200 would be the Hegel H390. 250 wpc of good clean power, inky black background, well dampened bass, killer DAC, etc.

[@xorbitman]

Does it weigh 100 lbs though?!

[@GrindCityGuitars]

@@xorbitman Ha! The H390 is a respectable 44 lbs.

[@jamesnelson8549]

Hi, ever look inside a Hegel? It is a living nightmare the way that everything is crammed in the box!!! Sounds good yes, quality not so much!

[@freddymcculloch6811]

I'm wondering the same thing. I cant decide on the h390 or the 7200.

[@john32son]

The first time I heard a Macintosh system, I knew I would own one someday. Years later, my music room has two Mc275's, a C2700 and a MT5. (I recently sold my MR88. Great product, but I didn't use it much). The joy that this system gives me is hard to explain.

[@mikevalentinas6766]

Personally I think bluetooth cheapens a product and HDMI is for AV use only. I have never expected nor wanted any of my two channel gear to have it. The HT bypass is a nice feature for those who want to integrate their 2 channel and multi channel systems without adding a bunch of extra circuitry to the McIntosh

[@xorbitman]

Audio snob...

[@goldenharborstudios7180]

@@xorbitman nah he has a point. Bluetooth is already outdated LE Bluetooth is out now & that shod take over shortly.

[@markwilliford7471]

Also, regarding the QOTD, I am a Mac owner, and have also owned Sansui and two different NAD receiver/ integrated amps. The McIntosh Amps I’ve owned are the 70’s MC2100 - passed down to me from my Uncle, passed down from me to my son, and still “commanding woofers” like a mini substation. Next for me came the MC352. This was a late 90’s amp that was purchased NOS in 2010. It was more refined than the 2100, and it too was a sound revolution for my system. I’m now running an MC462 and it seemingly combines the best qualities of both predecessor amps. It has scary-articulate bass, fantastic clarity, and extremely present mids. No regrets - at age 60, this may be my last amp. Is it worth the money? Clearly, it is not at face value the champion of sound quality per dollar spent. Exaggerating the point, the first NAD I owned - the 3020 - purchased for $220 in 1980 probably can’t be beat for value. But going to the other end of the scale, the MC462 just takes your sound enjoyment to another level. Something to consider with McIntosh, that even elevates it above many other high-end brands, is resale value. If you buy Mac and later decide you don’t like it fir some reason, or more likely, want to move on up in the line, you will recover a much more substantial percentage of your initial investment than you will with most other brands. Also, it is built to last generations (this applies to McIntosh with the stainless steel bases - less so to units with black painted metal bases) and does in fact last generations - usefully.

[@scottmeyer6005]

Exactly!! Amen brother!

[@Billfish57]

I been a Mac lover for 30-40 years. I finally got my dream set up 20 years ago after many different systems, I will never change a thing now except for new processors some day. Keep in mind it's a system and everything has to work together to get the most perfect sound. Also keep in mind one big thing, when the day comes to sell some of your Mac gear for whatever reason, you will be very happy at how much more it's worth than any other brand of the same size and age. Quality gear made in American is still worth a lot. MC-600 amp - MX-152 - Oppo 4K BRP 7ch. processor - Mac Academy 360's, and surrounds. Wire World cables and wires everywhere really made a big difference. All my neighbors listen to Steely Dan... Whether they want to or not.

[@richardramorino3319]

It never occurred to me that some people wouldn't like the looks of these. The green lettering, blue meters, and chrome highlighted knobs are by far the most iconic look in audio. That look has been around almost as long as a Porsche 356/911.

[@PG-PCW]

The best looking Amps on the market...let's not try to understand women. :-)

[@papaquonis]

I don’t recall ever seeing McIntosh products before I started watching these types of KZbin videos, so I also have no nostalgia for the brand at all. I don’t know if they just weren’t a thing here in Europe? But as good as it may be technically, I don’t think I’ll ever like their design language at all. Most definitely not for me.

[@johnpetrakis379]

Well yeah, everybody wants their audio stuff to look pretty, but at some point it becomes "audio jewelry" and that's just damn silly. MAC always hit me like †hat. My first commnent audio for "dentists" is what the Mgr. of Graham Electronics in Glendale Mall, in Idpls. Ind called it in the early 70's, He had more respect for vintage Marantz gear.

[@johnpetrakis379]

Something I forgot to add way back, MAC used to have"clinics" where you bring your gear in and get it tested. The MAC engineers ware amazed at a 50 watt Kenwood integrated for 250.00 measured so great, as good as any MAC!!

[@nateb9768]

My grandfather bought a used McIntosh system in either the late 60’s or early 70’s. That baby works like a charm and hasn’t been sent in ever.

[@robust98]

To Kristi, Mcintosh CANNOT be lighter and smaller because ALL Mcintosh Amps come with THREE ( x 3) huge transformers and at least 2 x large heatsink for each of the final stage output amplifier modules. The main transformer is for the AC to DC power conversion and the other two transformers are for Left and Right channels (AUTOFORMERS). The main AC/DC transformer guarantees sufficient if not surplus amperage draw from 6 or 12 transistors (depending on wattage) per channel. For instance, the MC602 comes with 2 x paralleled 12 transistors for a total of 24 transistors (push/pull - Class A/B) per channel and outputs 600 watt per channel (2~8 ohms) to accommodate higher amperage draw from 4~2 ohm speakers. That's a whopping 600 + 600 watts per channel at the final stage! The output power signal of one channel is then wired to the Autoformer which allows impedance matching of various impedance (2~8 Ohms) speakers with the amp. Unlike other amps, the output stays at 600 watt per channel disregarding the speaker impedance. I have been using Mcintosh amps since 1990's and it is a blessing that until today Mcintosh still persists in using proprietory thick wire gauge transformers and autoformers. If Mcintosh ever decides to give up on its Class A/B amplification and downgrade its heritage to Class D, that's the time when you will see smaller and lighter amps but until then we are blessed with its heritage. Just a quick note, I've completed the full modification on two of my Mcintosh amp (MC7300 and MC602) and got to tell you, disregarding the cost, the only parts that cannot be sourced and replaced are the main transformer and the L/R channel autoformer. Even Mcintosh and Audio Classics don't stock them any longer. The rest of the parts were purchased from Taiwan local vintage parts collectors including (Motorola/Toshiba/Sanyo) transistors that were made in the 90's. For all that said, the main AC transformer and L/R autoformers are the heart of Mcintosh, without these heavy duty transformers, Mcintosh is just another transistor amplifier manufacturer like Sony, Denon, Pioneer etc. (If you know how transistor amps works, you will understand what I'm talking about.)

[@scottdecarlo8667]

I look at McIntosh audio equipment in the same light that I look at the Porsche 911. Aside from both being out of my price range, they are both what I want. Are there better for the money? Subjectively, yes. But, I know both the McIntosh and the Porsche 911 will be sublime because they are remarkable examples of their type and they are what I want.

[@stephendigiovanni3854]

I started selling McIntosh in the late 80's. When I first heard it, I knew I wanted to buy one and bought the 7280 receiver. THIRTY years after buying it, McIntosh ran a special and gave me full MSRP on a trade in. I now own the MA 7900 integrated amp which is spectacular. McIntosh does not pay publications to tout their products which is one of the reasons it gets panned by a few "audiophiles". I'll put any MAC amp up against anything within double it's price.

[@mdjak3686]

Plain and simple, I paid for the iconic meters. I was a deadhead in the 70s, following them around concert to concert. I loved that wall of amps. Vowed to own one some day. Two years ago I bought the MC462, a 400wpc stereo amp. Is it the best amp there is? No clue because I’ve not owned better. But I love listening to it and looking at it. Perhaps not in that order.

[@missing1102]

Great answer. I think there is almost a built in reasoning as to why some of these products fascinate us so much. I have a Galaga machine in my basement becsue I swore I would have my own one day becaue it was my favorite video game. Just for a few minutes every now and then I am back in 1982. I went on the road to see the Dead a time or two. It's even hard to explain what that was like to younger people and maybe to myself if I want to admit it

[@musamusashi]

Honest answer.

[@mikejames-drummerreginacan1386]

I bought a used Mac C26 Preamp in 1985 (already 10 years old) for $300...I literally never turned it off until 2018 as I ran my TV audio through it as a well as music. I sold it after using it for 33 years for $300 and it was still working fine.......as far as the look, you can tell if a Mac is in a system from 100 feet away....the big size, blue meters etc are ICONIC. If McIntosh changes it's look it would be like Coke changing it's formula. There is one McIntosh, one Rolex, one Rolls Royce and one Harley Davidson and the feeling you get owning these products is the GAME CHANGER.

[@robertm.5816]

I have owned the 7200 for about 2 years, and everytime I listen to it is a treat to my ears, it's everything you you said it is in your review and more, couldn't be happier, I also own a tube amp and I almost couldn't tell the difference when comparing the warm tube sound, unbelievable for a SS system, I don't see myself parting ways with this amp, highly recommended to anyone on the fence about whether to buy it or not!

[@gregorytrane7828]

Just bought the MAC 7200 receiver and will have it Tuesday.. I've been a life long patron of McIntosh and traded in the MX117 pre-amp-tuner and MAC 2002 amp. Bought new speakers to match it's sound quality. Can't wait to listen to it at home. Good honest review as always.

[@skyengeh]

Yes McIntosh make great amps, but for half the price you can get the very capable, high damping factor, Hegel 390 which will certainly match the Mac for speaker driving ability. I thought that would be a telling comparison.

[@Lexington365]

I really should watch this videos to the end. Did Kristi really suggest adding bluetooth to a $7500 McIntosh amplifier? That would be like Tesla adding a hole in the floor of their cars so you could drive them like Fred Flintstone

[@melchior-chr.v.brincken8006]

There are two different positions: a) "how do I get the best sound for the least money?" , and b) "I have money to burn, what is the nicest I can get for it?" If the answer is a) get a handwired tubeamp with autobias, if the answer is b) get Mcintosh gear

[@jamesnelson8549]

McIntosh is absolutely worth it!!! Expensive yes!!! What you get is engineering at the highest of levels! Style is amazing & built in house USA!

[@racekar80]

My father was a Mac guy, had a MC 225 tube amp that went bad, we living in NY drove it to the factory to get it repaired. It was sent back in a month, and it looked like a brand new amp. Everything was perfect. And the price was reasonable considering. The quality of the equipment is the best there is, and it’s American made. If I could afford it I would have Mac equipment.

[@GR8Tmate]

I bought a 7200 to use in my shed and it’s not bad but there’s nothing quiet like getting home and switching on my McIntosh Pre & Power amps and listening to where real audio is at.

[@williamdevereaux7484]

I've owned various Mcintosh gear for 30 years and yes it is very expensive but I have no regrets. The big bold sound stage that's so lush is hard to beat. Tube or solid state the sound is there. It's not for everyone that's for sure. My current lineup. 2 MC 601 Mono Blocks. C1100 p which is a 2 box tube preamp. For digital the D1100 Dac preamp. It will be the last Dac I buy because I don't think digital can can get any. better. Streaming internet radio via Sonos the sound is amazing. My high end streamer Aurender N10 high Rez files sound as good as vinyl!

[@hifionthemoon2745]

My pick is the MC 2105. I built a system for a club with a partner and we chose the 2105 as our primary amps (two of them) while the dj booth monitors were driven by another amp. My partner had conceived a switching board to control speakers all over the club and which amps would drive them. But he made a mistake and had the Macs putting their output directly into the other amps. Both sets of amps were around 100 watts per channel. The result: the other amps in effect, blew up. The Macs came through without any problems. Later, I came across a 2105 used and in a moment of fiscal madness, bought it. Used it for many years and enjoyed it greatly.

[@billsmith8339]

I don't own any McIntosh equipment, but when my wife goes to the mall, I always go over to the Best Buy nearby to listen to whatever Mac they have with the B&W 803 D4 speakers. I like just about any music, but listening to Ella or Miles or even Lady Gaga is just about as good as anything as you can imagine. Once in a while, I'll even listen to some opera recording just to hear the violas and french horns ... I don't consider myself an "audiophile" because I really can't afford it, but I have always picked my speakers using a recording with a piano. It seems to me that a piano is just about the hardest music to replicate, and the closer to a piano sound a speaker can make, the better the speaker. And it always comes down to spending $20k+ for those B&W speakers, or staying married HAHA

[@1calebparker]

Just wanted to say I really appreciate this channel and all the information you put into each video. Helped me pick out my first turntable and a stereo setup for it. Knew nothing about the world of audio when I started watching. Thanks!

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Thank you, Caleb. Your comment really means the world to us.

[@Uniprnt]

Say what you will. I own since the late 80's at 7270 and C29. Both units to this day are just fantastic. Not only that, I paid about $2400 for the amp and 1800 for the C29. The amp today is worth about $3500 and the C29 about 2100. In fact Mc will give you 75% of its value today based upon the original purchase price. Furthermore, 34 years later I can still get the unit serviced by Mc or one of its dealers. I doubt you can say that about an amp or pre-amp booth 34 years ago. There is considerable value in owning a MC

[@marcmera6733]

Fell in love with Mac installing for a AV company that I had worked for in the past. I now have had my own AV business for 5 years and still saving up for my own Mac system.

[@sguttag]

Part of the McIntosh design is that their stuff works, from any era, looks like it goes together. I have zero problem with them keeping to their exterior design aesthetics. If you want something that looks more "modern" or "forward thinking" buy that other thing...you just aren't getting a McIntosh and 20-years from now, that other thing will probably be on the heap of outdated things while the McIntosh will continue to chug along being great.

[@johnpetrakis379]

Well, they have been building them in Binghampton, NY for a damn long time, but so has Audio Research, probably longer for MAC, they are legacy audio Co.s I don't know how "cutting edge" and a bit on the stodgy side. There all will be the latest greatest but most people do not realize how much groundwork was laid by Bell Labs in the 30's and as they say there's nothing new under the sun

[@stevenbrenner8232]

I think it really has to do with execution !

[@9thstreetbrandt]

Just got a MC2105 at an estate sale, running it through the preamp puts on the T778(bought after seeing your review:). That McIntosh sound is the GOAT, especially with Dirac room correction! I’m a mac stan for life

[@InPursuitOfLiberty]

I recently demo'd a McIntosh MA12000 and an Accuphase E5000. Both are integrated amps and both are unique and gorgeous and both have their own sound signature and both sound awesome. To me the McIntosh MA12000 was more full, musical and extremely engaging. The Accuphase sounded a little too thin.

[@jamesnelson8549]

Absolutely worth the money!!! After years of owning other very good amps & preamps, I went for McIntosh! C2700 preamp MC312 amp! Stunning sound! Incredible flexibility of inputs & outputs & external control inputs! DAC is fabulous as well!

[@dixonkim8659]

I've owned the McIntosh MA8000 integrated amp for a few years now and what you say about the sound on the MAC7200 Andrew is spot on. But like you and Kristy imply, the look is not for everyone. I for one love the look! Thank you for the great review!

[@radiorexandy]

I can't vouch for the latest generation of McIntosh products. However, McIntosh established its reputation in the fifties and sixties with their "amplifier clinics". If, for example, you had a Mac amp that needed a new set of tubes and brought the amp to one of their clinics, they GAVE you a new set of tubes! Talk about customer support, WOW! (Their rationale, BTW, was that if you had guests over, they wanted to have them hear their amps at their best. That, along with their "Sherman tank-like construction" is why Mac equipment is so expensive and has such high resale value. And, yes, MADE IN USA🇺🇸

[@paulwarren7018]

Never owned a Mac but have auditioned them many times over 40 years. They do their work effortlessly and reliably in nearly all scenarios. That's the appeal for me. The price tag and the space requirements are my alibis for not owning a Mac amp/receiver....yet.

[@ibassnote]

Respect to Kristi but the McIntosh look should never change. Never. I own Buchardts A500 so obviously I am forward thinking but if I ever see McIntosh looking like a Uniti Atom I will cry real tears.

[@daniannaci3258]

QOTD: McIntosh MC275 of course! I had a pair (consecutive serial numbers!) of the first MC275 reissues, the Gordon Gow Commemorative edition from the very early 90’s. I had each one strapped (not bridged, with tubes you parallel the channels) into monoblocks @150 watts each into 2 ohms. They drove my Martin-Logan CLSII’s, a hellacious load, with ease. Totally reliable, I only had to replace the output tubes once in 2002, the second set still exceeded specifications (which are printed on the side of the amp) when I finally sold them in 2013. Which brings me to another point why you should consider owning a McIntosh compared to most any other brand. Resale! I actually made money when I sold my MC275’s, and they were 30 years old. They new stuff also holds their value remarkably well. I’m pretty sure McIntosh can still repair ANY product they have manufactured since day one.

[@Jundaku]

The resell of mc275s are just stupid. Right now the mk6s are going for $5k or more. When they first came out they were $5k and now currently are just $6k. You cannot help but love how McIntosh is actually an investment.

[@daniannaci3258]

@@Jundaku I bought the pair of MC275’s new in 1993 when retail was $4000 each. When I sold them 30 years later the pair were bid up to $12,600. I included free shipping 😄. My new home wouldn’t accommodate such 90’s excess and a Luxman class A integrated and some Bower and Wilkins 805s replaced them. Quite ably I might add. Thanks for writing!

[@Winterfell1066]

I have the Mac 7200 and it is fantastic. I play vinyl on it with a VPI prime turntable through mid 80s Klipschorns with rebuilt crossovers. Vinyl + McIntosh + K Horns = Magical

[@LawrenceLouie]

When you power up a piece of Mcintosh gear, it just puts a smile on your face. The MAC7200 will be next on my list. Personally have a Mcintosh MHT-100 Receiver and Mcintosh MAC1700 Receiver from 1972 (from my dad) and its just a joy to listen to.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

There is definitely a smile-factor with a product like the 7200!

[@BC-ni3sk]

I have had the 7200 for a couple of years now and there is nothing else for me. It's a beast and drives a pair of thirty speakers without missing a beat!! I have wanted to own a Mac for 50 years and now have it! Hey Andrew let the hair go, bald is beautiful and saves on shampoo. Bald is a more advanced life form and yes the next iteration of the human race, we are just generations ahead!

[@Sheffield6688]

I just bought one. I’ve always wanted one for years and reading of the Bose takeover, well …. yeah, I had to move fast …. JUST. IN. CASE. I have no speakers (playmates) worthy of my new “Godzilla” so I’ll have to wait abit to hear it. I’m driving distance to a great dealer near Binghamton too in case I want to go upgrade to the DA2 module. Best of all? My amazing wife gave me ZERO hard time over me buying this. Complete Win. 🤩

[@chrisdelong2932]

McIntosh has built a well loved brand because they are not simply hi-fi equipment. They are a work of art, a piece of decorative furniture, a conversation piece. A brand does not get to where McIntosh is without producing extremely high quality gear, and I mean a history of top notch gear. I agree, when you spend between 3 & 9 thousand dollars, you’re splitting hairs in the difference between them. With all that said, I would choose the McIntosh over all of the others because of the output meters, because of the blue & green backlight, the beautiful heat sinks along the side and on the rear, as I said, a work of art. You can’t go wrong with a McIntosh. Thanks for a really enthusiastic and well rounded review. We thoroughly enjoyed it. MAC7200, now 8000u$, 9000u$ with the DA option. Keep up the good work.

[@dont4450]

My very first Mac ias a MA 6100 integrated amp that I bought in 1976. That beautiful sounding amp is still used daily, handles high resolution music files with ease, and has never been serviced. I've received offers over 3 times what I paid but I'll never sell n

[@dillonsennott1308]

Great review as always you two! Any plans to review the new home theater McIntosh MHT300? A McIntosh with FOUR 8K/60Hz & 4K/120Hz HDMI inputs and one output!!! If not, do you think I could get the same sound from the MHT300 as you heard in the MAC7200? I've read that McIntosh has a "house sound" that carries over throughout it products, but nervous about the newer HT products failing to continue in this tradition.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Dillon, While we don't currently have any reviews planned with them I would encourage you to reach out to them with your requests as it may help expedite things. 🙏

[@dillonsennott1308]

@@andrewrobinsonreviews For the sweet love of God, a McIntosh products has 4 top of the line HDMI inputs AND Dirac Live Room Correction. What will all the audiophile purists think?!?!?! 😂🤣😂

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

I would love to find out! I wish samples were easier to get.

[@dillonsennott1308]

@@andrewrobinsonreviews So I'm on the McIntosh website jumping between the new MHT300 home theater receiver and the MAC7200 to compare features and specs, and what do I see?! McIntosh quotes you on the actual McIntosh website page for the MAC7200!! AND they link to your KZbin review of the MAC7200 on the actual page itself. And it's NOT subtle! Your KZbin review is HUGE and displayed very prominently. Why in the name of sweet Jesus are you then not the very first person they send a review sample of the MHT300?! Makes zero sense to me. Nonetheless, I requested they send you one on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. Both private/direct message and on their posts proclaiming the arrival of the all new MHT300. Here's hoping it helps. Love you guys!

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Funny how that works, huh? We appreciate you sending out your requests. Hopefully, it resonates with the right people.

[@intothebeyond8763]

My grandfather had McIntosh AMP from the 70's it was beautiful. He was a huge audiophile if he was alive today he would loose his mind with whats out now and I'd be right there with him.

[@bill8384]

My first system in the mid-70s was a Mc105? with a pair of Klipsch Cornwalls. Still miss that system!

[@artvandelay837]

just got the cornwalll 4's. they are amazing

[@snortingmydeaddad]

Maybe a 2105? I have a ma 2275 tube integrated that is used with 1974 Cornwalls. Magical sound. Absolutely magical.

[@billhartsfield424]

I have a 1970’s Mac 1500 receiver. Still sounds great. Not as much power as some newer gear, but still impressive.

[@ThePalmermark]

Andrew I always wanted to ask you but too afraid to insult you about your amazing hair growth. As I watch your videos twice-weekly it was quite noticeable over the past year! Thank you for your honesty. Mark

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Mark I can understand your hesitation and appreciate you wanting to approach the topic in a sensitive way. But I am an open book when appropriate and so long as you (or anyone) asks their questions in a respectful and humanistic way, I will more than likely share.

[@jbbevan]

I have a McIntosh MA5300 which I'm using in a 10 x 10 den. I cannot justify to anyone WHY I sprang for this Amp....EXCEPT back in 1958 I wandered into one of those new stereo component salons (which were brand new at the time) and made the mistake of wandering into a demo room with a wall of blue meters. So a little over a year ago I took the dive. I think I decided to buy a McIntosh in 2021...in 1958. What I heard back then was a "gotta have" kind of experience. But McIntosh price tags are not about instant gratification...so it took me the intervening 60+ years to get up the courage to do it. I think my amp has most of the characteristics (to my ears) that Andrew describes...but mine has Bluetooth (which doesn't get used a lot)...phono capability (which does get used) and a DAC DA1. I have a lot of 24bit/96Khz recordings which I play from my other MacIntosh which is set up to put out that level of resolution. The front panel of the McIntosh shows me when the input is 96Khz. Is it worth it? Heqq, I don't know...but it was a 60 year life goal (bucket list item if you will) and I'm comfortable that that has been achieved and that I have the best, for me, there ever was. Oh, and I do like the McIntosh classic iconic LOOK.

[@andyv6230]

Congratulations James. Taking a notch off that bucket list always feels good. Best regards

[@felinthorn4977]

Best Mc Amp is the 2255, followed by the 2105. Both have been in my rigs for over 30 years. The 2105’s (3) handle theater duties but the 2255 is reserved for stereo listening. Really something special.

[@stevenbrenner8232]

Let's not forget the MC2100 BATTLESHIP amplfier. No blue meters, just awesome sound!

[@billcarpenter3880]

I have had a 7200 for about 10 years, and I have several old receivers, starting with a realistic quad receiver I bought new in 1977, stacked up in my work room. I chose the Mac because at the time this system was used in my cabin at the lake, and was in an unheated space all winter. I wanted ‘tube sound’ but the environment would have killed a tube setup. I wanted flexibility to change with my needs (I tore down the old cabin and built a year round building during COVID), and that would let me hook up whatever I wanted with an easy to operate unit, as I’m not the only one to use it. I didn’t want to buy another unit, as I had in the past when life and technology changed. The 7200 has been all that and more, no excuses have ever been necessary. It runs 16 hours almost every day. Feeds 3 other zones, all hardwired. Notes on your review and unit: you have some extra knobs on your unit, and new plug in boards make the unit upgradable and updated with some changes from my unit. The lit meters are part of the style…but I believe you can shut them off in software. The software allows you to name the inputs, and shut off the display for any inputs you aren’t currently using…simplifies operation for users who aren’t familiar with your system. Expensive, heavy, big (but not nearly as big as other Mac equipment).

[@PatrickGoddard]

So appreciate the thoughtful reviews you guys do. I'm probably like a majority of folks out there that browse products at the level McIntosh, then look at the price tag and go "JFC...". Nice to live vicariously through you guys and see a great explanation, analysis, etc. Maybe when I win the lottery...

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Our pleasure!

[@gregorytrane7828]

Your analysis of the McIntosh receiver was spot on! I've owned various ones and still do while upgrading for newer models of Mac equiptment for the last 35 years. I've owned other high end amps but none satisfied me long term like the McIntosh. I may change speakers and other equiptment from time to time but as long as I live, McIntosh will be my amp of choice. Good review as always.

[@195516Z]

Just discovered your channel. Very nice production value. Very approachable manner of explaining the tech to someone like me.

[@jamesdavid7782]

In a world of me-too asthetics, McIntosh's beautiful classic design is still a breath of fresh air after all these years.

[@JimboJason]

Thanks for the review! McIntosh equipment has and will never be in my budget so I couldn't say what is my favorite piece of gear from that company.

[@russbutton9347]

A close friend was the repair tech at San Francisco's House of Music. He was THE Mac repair tech for the SF Bay Area. There were plenty of stories about how badly they are engineered and hard to repair. The old tube gear was excellent. The Mac C22 preamp is one of the best ever made. But that doesn't mean it's the same company today. At this price point, your most reliable and durable line is from Bryston, who has a 20 year transferable warranty. Absolutely rock solid gear.

[@Breeder333]

McIntosh is worth EVERY penny. When I got my stuff about 15 years ago I was blown away at the difference I was hearing from my music. Never going back!

[@danieldelgado8153]

Agree. Got 2 mono block 611’s and a 5 channel 255 amp for my setup. Looking to get more. Happy 60th birthday gift from me to me. Lol. My best. Dan

[@altroist]

After owning a bunch of hifi gear; Denon, Marantz, Krell, Linn, Rotel and Yamaha I switched to McIntosh C50 with mcd301 with also a MB100 to feed my B&W803's which are connected to a CLASSÉ 301B. And I have to say it never sounded this good. Unreal difference. Now I don't want anything else. So, yes its worth it and they deserve all the audiophile praise they get! Loving it!

[@theocho8689]

My gear is the best and everyone else's gear sucks!!!! Give me a break. We all have different preferences and price points. As long as you like what you have then enjoy the music. I've owned many brands over the years and some were clearly not good, but that means not good for me. I loved my Kenwood integrated amp when I was a private in the Army but that's what I could afford then. I can definitely tell you that my current set up far exceeds the sound quality of the system I had as a private in the Army years ago. Listen on my friends and enjoy the music.

[@BC-ni3sk]

I have this amp, it's a beast. I've owned it now for just over a year. What's important to know it's very solid and there are many, many amps that are much more expensive and won't do what this does! I bought it for the blue meters only!!! I have wanted one of these for 50 years and waited to retire to buy one.

[@LarsonChristopher]

Congrats!

[@davidnadig9611]

I’m a 275 owner. Finally went for it 2 years ago. Combined with my 1987 Cornwall 2s it’s fantastic. I would add 2 things to your comments. Making Macintosh smaller and lighter perhaps cancels the whole company approach. The weight and heat and size are the cause of the quality sound. And regarding the latest tech? In my family, we have 60 year plus Macintosh sounding great and that’s the point of the brand. Pivoting to latest connections that could go away isn’t. IMHO. Btw thanks for the reviews.

[@karenmicich1203]

Which McIntosh would you choose ? MA 8900 or MAC 7200 ? Thanks !!!

[@frankbudjack5211]

I've owned (still do) 4 different McIntosh units. integrated ma5200, c-26 pre-amp, and 2 mono blocks. They are worthy products well made and deserve top shelf status. While there are other great high end companies, I still put mac at the top.

[@adolf72160]

I have had many amplifiers (tube and SS) and 4 years ago I tested my first Mcintosh in my house and since then I became a mcintosh “audio” lover, I said “audio” because my opinion it is only based on the sound performance. I just love the balance of MC sound between warm, detailed, dinamics, grip, euphonics, soundstage, pace and rhythm! Sometimes It is not the best in some of these features, but overall it have it all in my personal preference mix of prefered sound. Also it is very kind with my less than perfect recordings which are sometimes very normal in most rock, classical, pop and jazz music. I don’t need an audio system able to show the best of perfectly recorder music that is produced only for audiophiles, I need something that can give me the best of the music I like, regardless of how good that music was produced.

[@bullpup33]

I love the blue look. It gives me a sense of a purity. The hint warmth is what the makes the difference. Love these. Second to none in my book.

[@scottcarlon6318]

The GRATFULL DEAD made MCINTOSCH legend. Their WALL OF SOUND powered by these monster amplifiers was truly epic. If you are interested in rock history, read up on ‘’THE WALL OF SOUND’’. I am personally incapable of putting into words how earth shattering that moment in history was.

[@jamesmathews1841]

I saw the Grateful Dead with their wall of sound at Freedom Hall in Louisville Kentucky 6/18/74. There are absolutely no words to describe that musical and sonic experience. Nothing, absolutely nothing, can ever match the sound that night.

[@mrk8212]

I think you are spot on about the looks.. I was a teenager in the 70s and have loved the look for 50+ years, but I can also appreciate that it is not the most tasteful looking piece.

[@davep2945]

McIntosh is one of those brands that the audio haters love to hate kind of like they love to hate Klipsch. Most of them have never heard a McIntosh product but they are certain it sucks just like they have never heard a Klipsch Heritage line product properly set up but are also certain it sucks. People who don't have a dog in the fight and are willing to give Mac's a listen almost always love the sound. For some reason since Hegel has become a well known name the audio haters love to boast of the Hegel amps they don't own and have never heard but are certain sound better than anything else on the market. Oh, you have an Audiolab amp? That's cute, my imaginary Hegel is better. What are you, like nine years old? It's the same sort of thing that happened when Andrew Jones became a household name. Suddenly people wanted to name drop Andrew Jones as if knowing his name made them somehow more astute and credible audiophiles. And, of course, their Elac speakers were obviously superior because, ahem, Andrew Jones designed them, don't you know. Here's the truth. McIntosh makes great products. Whether you will personally like the sound or not is anyone's guess. Listen and decide for yourself. Hegel makes good products. Whether you will personally like the sound or not is anyone's guess. Listen and decide for yourself. Klipsch makes good products. Whether you will personally like the sound or not is anyone's guess. Listen and decide for yourself. Andrew Jones is a good speaker designer but whether you will personally like the sound of his products is anyone's guess. Listen and decide for yourself. I hope you see where I'm going with this. If not there's a pretty well known guy in the audio review business who likes to say that the only person who has to like the sound of your system is you. Can't think of his name to drop right this moment but it'll come to me. And before you pretend that your system is obviously superior to someone else's, remember what the Dude had to say, "that's just, like, uh, your opinion, man."

[@TM-fx2pi]

I agree with everything you said. People hate just to hate. They think its below them. I just don’t understand. I love Klipsch and McIntosh just to thumb my nose at those people. Just like Ford and Chevy haters. It’s just silly. Both Klipsch and McIntosh have been around since the late FORTIES, AND STILL GOING!! If you choose to snub your nose at that longevity then so be it. It’s just silly really. People speak with having never heard. I don’t understand that thinking. Further more….. rather than just blindly dislike a company because it seems to be the cool thing to do, as if your in high school, put your money where you’re mouth is, buy the gear, try it out for more than eight hours then make an educated decision rather than just flapping your gums for the sake of doing so caus your sitting at a keyboard or the like.

[@KristiWright]

"Oh, you have an Audiolab amp? That's cute, my imaginary Hegel is better." -- comment gold 😂

[@jorgegvb]

Most people who dislike McIntosh really mean they cannot afford one. If you spend any real time with a McIntosh in your listening room it will not be leaving anytime soon. I have had 2 in mine for the past 15 years.

[@Panotaker]

I have the MC7300, which is basically a 300 watt power amp. No preamp, and bigger meters. You supply your own preamp. It’s way over kill for my tiny bedroom, but I got it cheap, and it’s not going anywhere.

[@user-qr7ee2cp4y]

Not one of the cheapest, but one of the best out there.... you get what you pay for.

[@jerdonsbabbler3515]

I have an MC462 and the MA8900 for a different set-up. I just love them, but I'm not a hi-fi expert.

[@daniannaci3258]

Andrew, a point you nearly missed, and only because a camera pan clearly showed them, was the inclusion of autoformers used on the outputs of the power amp sections. Maybe because you didn’t want to get bogged down into an electrical engineering lesson but there are actually two McIntosh solid state power amp “sounds”: those Mac power amps using autoformers, and those that don’t, such as their entry level MAC5200. You perfectly described the sound of Mac solid state amps that use the autoformers and yeah, a Mac autoformer-equipped SS amp will sound great with any speaker which is a boon to us who may want to change speakers every year or two. You know, some enterprising loudspeaker company should begin to LEASE high end speakers. Just like you can lease a BMW or a Ford every 2-3 years, why not lease a pair of Magico’s or whatever brand for a couple years? And you can’t drive a Klipsch into a tree.

[@rick-fj5do]

Awesome idea !!!

[@dshindo1837]

I have always like the look of McIntosh products but never thought I could afford the high cost of owing such products . I was in a highend shop in ND back in the 90s. I could hear faint music coming from the mobile audio room. I couldn’t believe how clear and powerful the sound was at such a low volume . They had a McIntosh amp powering the system , I believe it was a six channel amp . I never forgot the sound of that setup . I eventually purchased my McIntosh system and couldn’t be happier . I have a MA9000 , MT5 and a MA58 powering surround sound speakers. I am slowly building a complete McIntosh system that will include a HT preamp and eventually upgrading the MA58 to a MA207 . I am also going to update to a DA2 module. I am not looking forward to removing 9000 from my rack system. I am a fan boy

[@singedcarry]

My Dad had a full McIntosh rack, with Yamaha NS-1000s. I grew up listening to that system. Everything else sounded like a clock radio compared to his system.

[@curt5802]

i never liked the NS-1000 for long-term listening... fatiguing...

[@singedcarry]

@@curt5802 It's my daily driver now. I have a pair on my hometheater/TV. I listen to them for hours almost every day. Never been fatigued by them. Not sure what you mean.

[@curt5802]

@@singedcarry well, while I appreciate their awesome clarity, at the time anyway, and it's been years, I always preferred the "New England" sound of say the Epi 100 or the Boston Acoustics A70 for my general all arounder. On the other hand, my friend who had and still has the NS 1000 liked and likes them very much indeed... It's also possible with my natural treble roll off in my ears over time, maybe I'd like them very much these days as well... I'm currently rocking Heresy - iv, and the Epi still sing in the other room,... so, it's the personal-ear thing, or like Robinson says: "The only person who needs to like how your system sounds is yourself."

[@singedcarry]

@@curt5802 I think one of things about the NS-1000 that can throw people off is that they're Monitors, and are about as neutral as a speaker can get. So they can often miss a warm sound that's engineered into a lot of speakers. The NS-1000's sound is really dependent on the source, and sometimes a good DSP is needed to bring them to life.

[@curt5802]

@@singedcarry All is well. I don't live in a recording studio... nor is my house nor the houses where I've heard the 1000s over the years. The frequency response of the Epi 100 is extraordinarily flat, and yet it still manages to skirt the analytical, colder sound that I do not prefer. In fact, I saw a recent study of the Epi that measured that fact, again, because the studiers were puzzled by how can a flat speaker not sound cold... but it was confirmed: pretty damn flat, no bass exaggeration, 44-18k. Plus, the 100 isn't too picky about its feed. However, you make a good point about such ultra-revealing speakers like the ns1000... they do thus depend more highly on the source. And, I get what you're saying... in the right room, with the right amp, etc... and plus depends on the ears, too, doesn't it. I'm not knocking the 1000s - some people consider them one of the greatest. I find them to be highly impressive, but for my own home life simply prefer others. That's what it comes down to, really, right? Enjoy what you have: the 1000s are classics and extraordinary... and, kudos to Robinson for his phrase, "The only person who has to like your system is yourself." (I hope I got that quote right.)

[@billdomitilli8125]

Ricardo Montleban tells you about rich Corinthian leather. THD? Noise floor? IM distortion? Damping Factor? Power consumption, even?

[@adamtaylor9617]

For me, a couple of things in favor of this amp over the others.. 1. Value retention. 2. Serviceability 3. Purely for Kristie.. you can actually get one. Lol

[@andrevanstiphout]

A couple of days ago a client dropped off a McIntosh MA5100 (circa 1966) for some minor work and a clean. It is rated at a massive 45 watts per channel into an 8 ohm load. The work and the clean were done in a couple of hours (it's very nicely built) so I had the opportunity to run it through a few high efficiency vintage speaker systems with my source equipment being a Thorens TD160 T/T with a Linn Cart (also a minor repair) and Spotify running through an iPhone (yes, an iPhone!). Does McIntosh deserve it's reputation? The answer is a big yes. You referred to the "blackness" behind the music. This has it in spades. It's not a bass monster but I did have some help from Mister REL. As for the styling, it was the same then as it is now. You just know that from the other side of the room that this is a bloody MAC and I love it. Unfortunately it's owner is coming to collect it in a couple of days and that is my only disappointment.

[@rxdocintn98]

I own vintage McIntosh. It’s worth every penny I paid for it. I don’t need ridiculous amounts of power and what vintage McIntosh does, it does it well.

[@mythos5809]

I think the Mac is great, sound and looks. I also agree that audio kit needs to address different levels of need, the pure audiophile approach with sound room etc, but maybe Mac should consider an alternate line, with different style criteria (less bright blue, smaller sizes etc) to fit modern requirements like stacking under the tv etc. For what it's worth...

[@franimal007]

I have always said, "Those who cut down McIntosh, never owned McIntosh." Simple as that...look at its history, it even survived a Japan company ownership. Best amp? MC352, MC75 (later addition), I had a MC2255 and talk about endless power!!!! I had a set of B&W 801 series 2.....Best amp and speaker combo I ever had. There are so many!!! I guess there is no "best" amp.

[@mrpmj00]

I've had a new 2017 C7 corvette in stickshift at 48, I'm 55 now. I got into hifi in the last 2 years (my music system is $12k), yet the McIntosh C49 doesn't sound any better than my Parasound 2100 preamp at 12x the price. Mac just looks nicer, but that's up to you to decide if $6k is worth it to you, it's NOT worth it for me. So I returned my McIntosh C49 and I got even better sound on other components and accessories. I would say that the McIntosh is more like a Porsche 911 which has a more prestigious badge than my Corvette but doesn't perform any better, just like McIntosh doesn't perform any better than my Parasound. ----- streaming = Apple Music lossless

[@marksilgalis9400]

The MC152 is a dream component for me. Life seems to always get in the way while I save for one. Because no one needs to go into debt for hi-fi. Ever.

[@avjake]

Not overrated, just overpriced.

[@mxbishop]

I have the MA6900 integrated amp (since 2006), and other than the little incandescent lamps that burn out from time to time, this beast has been solid, and without issue. My best advice: If you get a big piece of Mac gear, find the best place to put it, and then, never move it again. They weigh as much as a giant block of uranium, and have probably caused untold hernias in men trying to move them around. I kid you not.

[@andrethegiant2877]

I sell McIntosh products and own a couple of their pieces myself (MC207 and MHA100). I tell customers they are our best, however if you want 95% of the performance at a 3rd the price they can look at Rotel and Arcam's amps. They're ugly black/gray boxes but sound great.

[@lilcha85]

95% is a bit of a stretch, but overall I agree

[@jeremiahchamberlin4499]

Are you sure you’re selling McIntosh products? It seems to me you’re selling Rotel, Arcam, etc. As others have mentioned, McIntosh holds their value (and many time increases it), often has greater ‘flexibility’ (sometimes less), looks and sounds impressive. The items I’ve listed are known as ‘selling points,’ you should use them before adding, “Or you could settle for something not as handsome, or impressive, that sounds almost as good, that won’t last nearly as long, may not be supported in your country, but will save you a lot of money today. But if you and your customers are all about making a buck or saving a buck, I’ll see you both coming out of Walmart soon. I’m sorry, I don’t mean to be cruel, but I own a McIntosh product, and I was sold for all reasons I listed above.

[@andrethegiant2877]

@@jeremiahchamberlin4499 You're not coming across "cruel", you're coming across naive. I did say that you can get similar audio performance from those other units, and yeah, i sell all three. I too own 2 McIntosh products and like them very much but I get them at a significant discount that the average consumer doesn't. If you're buying Mac gear at full price you will not ever resell them for that same price or higher unless it's some limited edition or rare piece. If your goal is to build your sound system around performance for the dollar you'll get more run from one of the other brands. If your goal is to impress people with pretty blue meters and green "McIntosh" logos at 3 x the price then by all means buy the Mac. To say the Arcam/Rotel owner is a Walmart customer is like saying the guy that opted for the BMW instead of the Ferrari is cheap. Sorry if i offended you. At the end of the day these are stereo components, not members of your family.

[@stevenbrenner8232]

With very few exceptions, McIntosh holds it's value better than any other name!

[@grampawwillie1665]

in the end the real limiting factor is the quality of the work that went into the mix. once you have a pretty decent system you'll notice some recordings are much better than others. and this is the same whether you like vinyl or CD. if sound systems were to be improved they would need to move from stereo to at least L-R-C 3-channel

[@ScottGrammer]

Pro vintage audio repair tech here. The main value of McIntosh is not its sound quality, although it is excellent. It's value is its build quality, appearance, and the likelihood that 50 years from now, it will probably still work just fine.

[@tritiumglo4699]

Vintage yes. Modern processors with Marantz internals, No.

[@edwestfall2732]

Best amp McIntosh ever made = MC240 (maybe MC225). I've owned the MC240 along with a number of solid state amps and Manley Snappers for about a year now. I keep coming back to it for long listening just because it sounds so warm, beautiful, and lush. It's never disappointing.

[@hankchampion8831]

I love my MAC7200! Totally worth it because it sounds fantastic and with the phono stage and DAC, it can handle any musical component you plug into it. Plus McIntosh service is great. I run mine with a VPI Classic Signature Turntable with 3D tonearm with re-tipped Benz H cartridge, McIntosh MCT500 transport and Acoustic Zen Adagio speakers with REL Britania 3 Suwoofer. I use a Magnum Dynalab ST-2 FM Antenna for the tuner.

[@Patriot6669]

I often hear about MC's service being great. Just curious, did your MAC7200 have issues they had to fix? Great service is awesome, but a reliable product is even more important to me.

[@hankchampion8831]

​@@Patriot6669 I have had no problems with the MAC7200 and am still enjoying it very much! MCIntosh also has a great reputation of reliability too! ​

[@Patriot6669]

@@hankchampion8831 Excellent! Thanks. 👍

[@darrynmeadows]

I agree with Kristi the only one for me is the ma252 no blue meters just a simple amp if you don't like the glowing tubes you turn them off

[@Cakebattered]

When I first started selling high end audio, I made a statement that McIntosh was a brand for audiophiles and enthusiasts. The older salesmen corrected me saying , "No, its always been a brand for rich guys." McIntosh was and still is a status symbol brand over a brand catering to enthusiasts.

[@SteveRig82]

Great review I love my MAC7200, which is driving a pair of XR50 as my back speakers and the MAC7200 second output to a pair of MC611s driving a pair of XR100 for my primary speakers. Really enjoy McIntosh!

[@itsvladzino3246]

Deep purple colour. Aromas of rich dark currants, nectarine skins, gushing blackberry, but lots of fragrant tobacco, rich soil, white flowers, smashed minerals and metal. Medium-bodied and saucy but racy acidity stabilises the amplifier nicely with the robust sound stage. Deep red currants and ripe cherries, laden with mocha, loamy soil, charred herbs, pencil shavings, roasted hazelnut. Dense like characters that make it perfect for cellaring, however it is listenable straight away once you’ve added a pre and a post amp. And phono stage.

[@trashyaudiophile7301]

As someone that used to work next to a high end audio dealer, McIntosh is among the top 10 HiFi audio companies in the world. There's more expensive, but it's very hard to beat the sound of a Mac.

[@MrPompanoman]

With a transistor radio maybe lol over priced junk I have heard mcintrash out preformed by sansui Harmon kardon pioneer forget the real high end manufacturer's

[@trashyaudiophile7301]

@@MrPompanoman setup, equipment are key. I don't know where this comment came from. But I haven't heard any mid grade equipment sound better then a McIntosh.

[@MrPompanoman]

@@trashyaudiophile7301 I find it interesting that no wealthy reviewers own it? I have always thought it was mediocre sounding. I prefer audio research. So many superior brands but if you like it it's all that really matters. I find it lacks refinement and sounds mid fi lacking detail and although they have fantastic output transformers I have heard many repair people say the internal hardware is cheap it is what it is.have a nice day.