If only a genuine portrait of Anne was discovered, it would be amazing!! I am still hoping.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Me too!
@kelrogers848016 күн бұрын
But what if that etching, described by Ricard Masefield? It made the hair of my neck stand up. A likeness of the lost Lumley portrait? I could see how it could have served as the original for Anne's many B portraits. It shows a woman, not beautiful, but of character, with beautiful eyes. Your thoughts, perhaps? No one seems to talk much of it.
@alancumming64077 ай бұрын
Thank you Claire for producing such a well researched and interesting broadcast. When I first saw this portrait for a brief second I thought it was Margaret Pole.
@Shane-Flanagan7 ай бұрын
Lol I thought the same 😂
@ninalily7 ай бұрын
I knew she looked familiar to someone we knew but i couldn't place it! Lol makes sense now.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I would say that the letters certainly don't match her, but I know what you mean.
@BetterGreta137 ай бұрын
So did I!
@Suza-w1z7 ай бұрын
I could have been convinced at first that it was Anne. It does show a longer face with high cheekbones and the longer nose, but then the Margaret Pole suggestion I could see that too, lol The dress and initials explanation does discount the Anne theory though. Thank you Claire! (I would have been annoyed at that price too.)
@BlackCatMargie7 ай бұрын
50 quid, for a poor photocopy like that! Mr. Jones should be ashamed, but I've seen many similar examples of Ebay sellers being charlatan, unfortunately. It's disappointing to see Alison Weir and Tracy Borman falling for it, as they both have huge followings and should be more vigilant. Thank you for sharing your very thorough research, Claire.
@HawkqOjOp7 ай бұрын
Did Tracy state any reasons for her verification?
@deedeedodo80927 ай бұрын
@@HawkqOjOp good question, I'd like to know too. Also with Alison Weir because her books are so factual.
@AndriaBieberDesigns7 ай бұрын
Exactly
@BlackCatMargie7 ай бұрын
@HawkqOjOp Claire didn't say, but I guess it's possible that she has been so keen to believe it was true, that she did not examine the evidence as deeply as she might have done. At her level, that's a big booboo, but I've done that occasionally with my family tree work, only realising years later that I sent myself down a wrong path. I guess we are all human, and I don't think she, or Wier, would have been deliberately misleading, unlike Mr. Jones.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I did get very angry when the photos went to £70 and he was selling prints of his print for over £1000.
@ButterflyEars607 ай бұрын
BOOM! Mic drop! And this is why I LOVE you! You're the best, Claire! I don't see an argument against what you've laid out. Particularly the very obvious fact that the queen of England would never be unfashionable. It would also be a bad reflection on Henry. A man who wanted to display himself as number 1 in all things to the world. He'd never stand for his queen in clothing out of date, becoming a laughing stock at the French court. He'd be humiliated at the accusations that would come from that gossip, lol. And Anne was clawing for legitimacy in the eyes of the world. She's certainly not going to wear old fashioned clothing. I can hear the giggles and whispers. You can bet it would have been written about!😅
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much!
@cassia-andor64457 ай бұрын
Not to mention Anne was just a very fashionable person, almost what we would refer to as gothic now.
@leticiagarcia90257 ай бұрын
Yes, we’re all dying to see the real portrait of Queen Anne Boleyn. This guy profiting off from this portrait of this unknown woman without verification is sickening. You did the right thing by researching this portrait. If a portrait is found it should be verified before showing it. Furthermore it should be respected. I wonder if there’s a real portrait of Anne Boleyn lies forgotten inside the Vatican. As you were explaining the fashion, I wondered if there was a popular fashion designer during the Tudor era. Thank you Claire. I enjoyed your video.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I got very annoyed at how much he was selling photos and prints for.
@myladyswardrobe7 ай бұрын
I'm Bess Chilver, referenced in the video. The concept of a "fashion designer" or a clothing maker (dressmaker/tailor etc) being the *arbiter* of what the latest fashion was, only appears in the 19th century. Charles Worth, a Yorkshireman from UK), settled in Paris and is arguably the "father" of the Fashion Designer. There were ateliers before that, but he is the first to be a "name" for fashion. During the Tudor period "fashions" were set by the elite. They would have an idea they had probably seen elsewhere that they wanted incorporated into their dress and asked their tailor to make it up. So, fashion was *customer* led not *maker* led. There is a myth that Anne Boleyn set the fashion for the "french hood" (a modern term to differentiate the style of head dress most associated with her from the style in the portrait that is the subject of this video eg "gable" or "english" hood). Yet, the "french" hood was being worn from early on in the 16th century along with early versions of the gable hood. French and English Court/Elite fashions were very similar whereas French/English and Italian were different in the same period. So it was easy for French dress influences to come to England and maybe vice versa - though the English/Gable hood seems to be uniquely English/Great Britain. So, short answer is, no there were no "fashion designers" in the Tudor period.
@leticiagarcia90257 ай бұрын
@@myladyswardrobe Thank you Bess.😊
@carag25677 ай бұрын
Boy, Claire, you really took some people to task here, and just as you said, in the most polite way possible. But with ALL the receipts. This was one of the most epic takedowns I've ever seen 😍 👑
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you! I very much disagree with these people, but they have their views and I have mine.
@robinburke20367 ай бұрын
Your knowledge on all things Anne Boleyn is truly impressive! I completely agree that this is NOT her.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@cenedra21437 ай бұрын
Instead of 'it's never aliens', historians should adopt 'it's never Anne'. 😂
@BlackCatMargie7 ай бұрын
Brilliant! Lol!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Ha!
@jamesaron19677 ай бұрын
It was aliens! LOL
@carolrondou61617 ай бұрын
Or as Dr. House said " Its never Lupus." From my non-American friends, "House was a medical drama featuring a ill-tempered Dr. who diagnosis rare diseases. If you have a chance to watch it, do.
@Sabrinajaine7 ай бұрын
Have you seen that guy on twitter who kept hinting there was a new, undiscovered Anne Boleyn portrait and would only ever reveal part of it? From what we could see the lady was in more of Elizabethan-era style dress, so it seemed unlikely to be her!
@chasegordonn7 ай бұрын
I literally just posted a comment about something similar. I think people know the shock factor behind Queen Anne. So they sensationalize what they can to get views. It is sad, and it comes in the way of real research! Thank you for sharing! Bless you! 🌹
@chasegordonn7 ай бұрын
Also I feel as if I said that better than in my original comment! I hope it gets the point across though!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Oh yes! He went on for months and then disappeared!
@-Reagan7 ай бұрын
100% agree! Gorgeous research work. Thanks - and beware an art dealer who claims provenance is irrelevant the way you’d reject wooden quarters (even if someone told you they could be used to fool a drink machine). We are not machines and art is not just worth whatever monetary value you assign it, anymore than a sitter’s actual identity is irrelevant to the sitter you’d prefer it to be. Or who actually painted her. Provenance, my dear reader is everything. Of course, if you don’t think so, I have an unidentified Holbein I’d like to show you, as well as a lovely bridge…
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Yes, I completely agree, provenance is everything.
@sixeses7 ай бұрын
Thanks Claire. Some people seem to be going through catalogues of 16th century portraits and claiming that they're different people.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I think people are so very desperate to find a contemporary image of her.
@simon1127 ай бұрын
The painting looks nothing like queen Anne in my opinion I totaly agree with you Claire,👍☺️
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
It's hard to know what she looked like really when we only have the 1534 medal as a proper likeness.
@simon1127 ай бұрын
So so many Tudor mysteries we will never know the answers to sadly, but that what makes history so interesting and keeps us comeing back for more. ☺️👍
@xavisanchez75227 ай бұрын
Is anne of bretagne, so no anne boleyns inventions, finally we know the truth at least partially
@indianamichelle72166 ай бұрын
Enjoyed your analysis and discussion on this Claire ❤ As an American Anglophile who loves history, especially Tudor history, I have greatly enjoyed and learned so much from your channel over the years. You present great content and have such a lovely & soothing voice! My Chihuahua, Ruby 🐕 also loves listening during her naps 😉😌 Thanks again, keep up the good work!
@maryarigho58687 ай бұрын
Not her. Doesn't look like other portraits. Great research.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@iTsEfFiNsTePhh7 ай бұрын
I don't think it's Anne either but at the same time I can DEFINITELY 100% understand why someone would think it is because everyone who's interested in Anne desperately wishes to know what she looked like so I can see why someone would put all their hopes of that into it here that it is her 🤷🏻♀️ When I first heard about it I was super excited too ☹️ Hopefully one day though we'll know what she looked like (or time machines are invented) 😂 Great video as always Claire ❤️
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Yes, we're all absolutely dying for a contemporary portrait to be found.
@stephanieking44447 ай бұрын
Excellent research work, Claire 📚👏 first thing I thought, looking at the portrait, was that the lack of representation of a pregnancy is a very strong point against identifying the sitter as "Anne Boleyn, Coronation Portrait". The fashion also struck me as being inadequate for 1533. I'm glad you researched the provenance, that's always essential. That seller on ebay showed his true colours when he said asking about it was "silly".
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@greybeardcanadian10365 ай бұрын
So well argued. I am always entertained and informed by your videos. You lay out your research and conclusions so well.
@bmj16807 ай бұрын
I am impressed with your research. You did your homework and I am sure that you are right
@twiley35307 ай бұрын
Very Interesting 🧐 thanks as always
@sarahfellows66087 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing this as I thought it's not anne at all I saw the post and wanted to see what you thought about it brilliant video as always claire ❤
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@christinestudley39827 ай бұрын
Wow, Mr Jones has quite the scam going, I get frustrated by seeing portraits of Anne that were obviously painted in the 1800’s by the artist’s style and clothes not related to the period Anne was alive. Thankyou Claire! Another great one
@jochildress50033 ай бұрын
Fascinating! I love having your well researched perspective. You are my go to historical expert. I have absolutely no standing to have an opinion, and I will adopt yours!
@hazelgillett71684 ай бұрын
Great info, as always, Claire, thankyou! This lady looks more like Margaret Pole than Anne Boleyn to me, but I am not suggesting that she is MP, but there is very little resemblance to AB at all, to my way of thinking……
@miladyblue50777 ай бұрын
I hope you left a one star review for that seller.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I think I did!
@SF-ru3lp7 ай бұрын
Marvellous analysis, Claire. I thoroughly enjoyed your talk. My immediate reaction was that this person was not the same as in the Anne Boleyn portrait. G Ire
@Shane-Flanagan7 ай бұрын
Claire looking lovely in red ♥️🍒
@chasegordonn7 ай бұрын
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
@chasegordonn7 ай бұрын
I so agree! Bless you!
@chasegordonn7 ай бұрын
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
@chasegordonn7 ай бұрын
🌹♥️🌹♥️🌹♥️🌹♥️
@chasegordonn7 ай бұрын
🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
@laurabrowning79737 ай бұрын
Interesting! I like your analysis and agree with your conclusion. I thought for a minute that you were going to bust that guy for fraud!! Thank you for sharing your tenacious journey!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I was pretty cross with him!
@LeslieSunshine177 ай бұрын
That lady doesn't look like the one surviving known image, plus the sitter looks much older than Anne would have been during her brief reign.( Unless our poor Anne aged very poorly🙄) Thank you Claire for another great and informative video, I have been a fan since you started ABF online❤
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Aw, thank you, that's lovely to hear.
@lunitab0nita7 ай бұрын
As much as I love the portrait, thank you for clearing this up!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@curiousman16727 ай бұрын
Solid analysis. Well done.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@brenmanock7 ай бұрын
Thank you Claire for your research and shelling out that money for us!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you! I must admit, I didn't like spending it!
@gidimeir7 ай бұрын
Fascinating and so informative! Thank you for sharing your wonderful thorough research!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@christinetitus63887 ай бұрын
Thank you Claire for sharing a very detailed & compelling evidence regarding this portrait. I totally agree with you, not only does it not look like Anne from other portraits , the style of dress , age of woman, make it most likely that it is not Anne.
@veni.vidi.reliqui79467 ай бұрын
This was very informative!! Thank you!
@meg19557 ай бұрын
Well researched and thought out. Thank you for the quality of your videos.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@kevster21717 ай бұрын
Thanks for that amazing research! I saw this portrait discussed on Twitter recently as possibly AB. I had already read your account on AB Files so knew it was nonsense of course. 😊
@Calla-sl8gd7 ай бұрын
Hi Claire! Good video as always. Like Anne lovers everywhere, I would love to see a known, verified painting of Anne. It goes along with other wishes of mine ~~ like knowing her date of birth, her zodiac sign (Libra, I'm sure), etc. I've asked myself why there was no entry in a family Bible of the birthdates of Mary, Anne and George, and did Henry really get rid of everything belonging to or about Anne? It's the unknown that keeps us searching for the reality, and it's the lack of anything that keeps that reality out of our reach. This reminds me of a video by Dr. Kat on her channel, Reading the Past, where she explored the traces of Anne. There are very few traces of Anne left, either by way of destruction or time. It's a shame ~~ I would love for someone to find something that can be reliably traced to her. Thanks again for the video!
@LeslieSunshine177 ай бұрын
Why Libra? I would say Aquarius😉
@myladyswardrobe7 ай бұрын
Entries into a Family Bible is very 18th/19th century.
@Calla-sl8gd7 ай бұрын
@@LeslieSunshine17 No, fellow air sign. She must have been a Libra. We're romantic, courageous, we love balance in our lives. Just like a Libra!
@Calla-sl8gd7 ай бұрын
@@myladyswardrobe I'm not sure where I heard it, but there was mention of Lady Margaret Beaufort making entries into a family Bible about births in her family.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you! The one artefact that's linked to Anne that I love is her Book of Hours, the one that she's inscribed "Le temps viendra, Je Anne Boleyn" because that would have been something that she used several times a day and that was important to her.
@jenniferstone29757 ай бұрын
Outstanding presentation! Well researched and well reasoned throughout. Thank you for such an interesting, informative thesis.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@jobes45257 ай бұрын
Claire is my Go to advocate of anything to do with AB, or in this case, ABR. Don't care how many famous historians take on a case, Claire researches criteria with a fine toothed comb, and dedicates her life to this research. TY, Claire.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much. In this case, I'm not an art historian, so I'm only sharing my opinion and the expertise of those I asked.
@wendychavez53487 ай бұрын
@anneboleynfiles , you have valid sources, and your research includes multiple aspects of Anne's life, acquaintances, interests, attitudes, etc. That's why you are also my go-to for actual facts concerning Anne Boleyn and all things Tudor! Of course I enjoy most of the fictional versions of her, though it's vital to remember that if it's not advertised as a true and accurate account, we must take it with a large pinch of salt.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
@@wendychavez5348 thank you so much. Your words made my day. I do get discouraged at times but when I read words like yours it really helps me. I love research and I love sharing what I find.
@Bluebirdmcdonald41857 ай бұрын
Thank you Claire (yet again) for your thorough research. It absolutely drives me crazy how people put 2 & 2 together and get 270!! Why are so many people so lazy with their fact finding? It means good researchers have to do twice as much work, and take on the stress of the nasayers just to give the truth a voice 😳( typed from my soapbox) 😂
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@colleen367 ай бұрын
This is a great video. So interesting
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@hjahansouz7 ай бұрын
Thank you, Claire! Unfortunately people are going to make false claims because they know a lot people really want to see a picture of her.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Yes, that's very true.
@denisehill77697 ай бұрын
If pushed one could argue that the lady bears some faint similarities to Elizabeth 1st - the slightly hooded eyes and long nose. As I'm sure did a lot of other people! But the old-fashioned style hood and dress, with what look like fur or deep velvet sleeves, are the deciders for me; given we know that Anne favoured the French styles and was known for her fashion sense, plus the age of the sitter and the sumptuary laws, all go against it being Anne. And if the image in the Chequers ring is of Anne, then that portrait doesn't look like the lady in this portrait either. Thank you Claire for providing the results of your research, this is really interesting - and I hope Mr Jones received the ebay feedback he deserved!!!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Yes, it just doesn't fit with costume of the 1530s.
@wednesdayschild36277 ай бұрын
I think the Nidhall painting and the two Holbien sketches are Anne Boleyn. They are closest to the medal. That painting in the video does look like the Nidhall painting. Maybe that is the confusion.
@LeslieSunshine177 ай бұрын
Agree! I always thought the Holbein Sketches were preliminary to the full length portrait that was lost or destroyed somewhere in time
@shayadayan33435 ай бұрын
I am of the opinion that Anne was born in 1507, but even if you subscribe to the 1501 school of thought, Nidd Hall is a much older sitter than 35 years old. She looks to be at least late 40s
@HawkqOjOp7 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for your research, Claire! Do you know how Tracy Borman "verified" it? I've always trusted her research.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I don't believe she did verify it, I think she was just sharing an opinion.
@annkelly00727 ай бұрын
Excellent video & summation. I wholeheartedly agree that it is not Queen Anne Boleyn.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@brattycorgi6 ай бұрын
I would love for a hunt for the actual portrait to get underway like one was done for Richard III. If one was actually found it would be major news, though confirming its authenticity would be difficult.
@KRISTIANITY_7 ай бұрын
I used to love Alison Weir (because of the Lady in the Tower, I really ate that book up), but then I realized she's one of those sensationalist authors trying to cash in on historical gossip and shock value. Things like her post on this painting, or stuff she wrote in her other books (in Elizabeth: The queen, for example, she literally says Catherine de Medici ordered the Bartholomew massacre, this statement really shocked me). To some extent I still like her, but this experience taught me to be much more cautious towards authors and their claims.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I pick non-fiction history books by the bibliography and notes/references. I want to make sure that the author/historian has done their research. With the Lady in the Tower, although I disagree on several of Weir's views, I would say it was well researched.
@annieoakley35167 ай бұрын
The gabled hood is a DEAD giveaway.
@myladyswardrobe7 ай бұрын
In terms of it being much too early for Anne and being compared to the medal of Anne 10 years later yes, it is a give away this is not Anne.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Actually, Anne chose to be depicted in a gable hood for the 1534 Most Happy Medal and she wore one to her execution, so that can't count her out, but the lappets count her out.
@Blossom137457 ай бұрын
Mrs Claire, how likely is the possibility that the Vatican could have Anne Boleyn love letters or a portrait of her? Would love to know your opinion. Thank you Claire for all you do for Anne Boleyn and the Tudors too!!!! 💝
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
They have the ones that Henry wrote Anne, I suspect because they were stolen from Anne to be used as evidence that the king was in a relationship with her, but I don't think Anne's to Henry have survived. I think he would have destroyed them in 1536. I don't think they have a portrait of her either.
@avalonkerr83327 ай бұрын
I am reading Alison Weir's biography of Eleanor of Aquitaine, so recently followed her on FB. I am now concerned as I found it odd how quickly she just came out with, "Yes, it's Anne Boleyn." It seemed hasty for an historian. I'm an actress, not an historian (just a big history nerd,) but I am questioning my decision now to read her book. Any insights would be appreciated!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I wouldn't let it put you off. When I'm picking a biography, I always look at the notes and references section and the bibliography to make sure the author has done wide research, so I'd suggest that whenever you pick a biography or history book.
@avalonkerr83327 ай бұрын
@@anneboleynfiles Thank you, that does seem to be in place in this biography. I greatly appreciate your input!
@lynnekern39987 ай бұрын
I vaguely remember in one of your talks about portraits of Anne that there maybe one full length portrait that was saved from destruction hiding in someone's collection. Wouldn't it be wonderful if it was true and we could finally see what Anne truly looked like. People contemporary of her time spoke of her fascinating eyes. What did they look like? I would love to know.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
It would be wonderful if that came to light.
@spookycat85567 ай бұрын
That eBay seller should be reported for ripping off buyers. The painting itself does look beautiful and I think is similar to the Holbein drawing which is possibly Anne in a gable hood.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
He certainly was making the most out of all the publicity.
@catherineleslie-faye43027 ай бұрын
I could see Anne Boleyn's mother in that outfit... but not Anne.
@LeonieRomanes7 ай бұрын
It's a bit old-fashioned for Anne.
@Lulu-ut9pv7 ай бұрын
I don't think Anne would refer herself as Anne Boleyn Regina...when partied to the king
@lindanokes35157 ай бұрын
I would love for someone to uncover a true painting of Queen Anne she is my favourite ❤
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Me too!
@ZiggyWhiskerz7 ай бұрын
@00:40 BAR ? Soooo Bolyne Anne Regina I dunno man.... Could be any other name too😅
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Yep!
@denisecampbell67367 ай бұрын
If this is a Coronation portrait of Anne, then where’s The Queen Consort Jewels? Also, as you say why’s she in an old fashioned out of style type of dress? No way Anne would’ve done that. Yet again, a necklace w/A & B has struck once more!, Take Care!!
@katherinecollins46857 ай бұрын
Great video
@carolynpike37797 ай бұрын
I don’t think it is Anne but when I looked at the “A” symbols they look the same as the necklace Elizabeth wore in the family portrait with HenryVIII, Jane Seymour, and Mary. I am aware that some historians think that that is an “A” pendant but I have heard others saying that it is some type of religious symbol which looks like an “A”. So it is possible that the “A”s are not As at all but just some religious or other symbol? Does Bess or some other expert have any view about that?
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I've discussed it with Bess before as her sister makes replica jewellery and she thinks it's a religious symbol.
@haegtesse7 ай бұрын
I am always surprised by how careless Weir can be when she catches wind of a juicy rumour. Or even rumours long-considered to be false.
@haegtesse7 ай бұрын
I'm always surprised by how careless Weir is with a juicy rumour. She's happy to spread both old & tired rumours for a shock or new ones with very little evidence.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
She clearly has her own views about this painting, but they just don't make sense to me.
@dalestaley56377 ай бұрын
That doesn't look like Anne Boleyn. Thank you, Claire for bringing this to light. It frustrates me ppl rush to claim something as fact, especially when they've a history of doing that before on other topics concerning the Boleyn family. What happened to due diligence, careful assessment, weighing the facts before rushing to judgements. Clickbait Weir.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@ReneeFabulous-wt9ty7 ай бұрын
I have a question. Forgive me, if you stated what year this was painted. If you did, i missed it. But, what if this painting was painted later? Would an artist of the seventeenth or eighteenth centuries know such exact details of the fashions of the 20s and 30s of the sixteenth century? Edit: LoL! I just got to the part where you say, "If this was painted later. . ." I should've been more patient. 😂
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Ha! Don't worry!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
The original would definitely need testing to date it conclusively.
@mcbrineart3 ай бұрын
Agree with you. And definitely NOT by Holbein.
@wednesdayschild36277 ай бұрын
In Italian carnation is garofano. Doesn't sound like carnation.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Interesting!
@EmmaFre-Haack2 ай бұрын
Ci sono corretture o pentimenti di sorta? Nei decenni può essere successo di tutto…grazie,Claire. Il tuo nome - chiarezza - è programma!
@kaylovesdisney45827 ай бұрын
Hmm...I smell a scam. £59 for a very bad photocopy and not even of the whole portrait. I knew it wasn't Anne as soon as I saw the hood. There is no way Anne would allow herself to be depicted in out of date fashion. Plus, it's very unlikely that she would have a lavish portrait painted in the 1520s as she just wasn't important enough. If, and it's a big if, her likeness was painted, I suspect it would more likely be a miniature as a keepsake for her parents or Henry during their courtship...but of course there is no evidence to suggest that anything of the nature existed. There is a nice scene in The Tudors where Henry has a locket with a picture of Anne... but that's fiction, all be it a nice idea. Personally, I have never been much of a fan of Alison Weir...I purchased her Lady Jane Grey book a long time ago but just couldn't get into it. And from what I hear, she does seem to make quite a few mistakes. I know it hasn't been properly dated yet, but for me, the Hever Castle Rose Portrait has always been the Anne I see and my favourite. Thank you Claire for your in depth research into this Portrait, I'm only sorry that what you received was not worth the money you spent because it's still a nice Portrait even if it's not Anne.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
It was a crazy amount for a bad photo!
@OhforgodssakethatsmeАй бұрын
I'm not convinced that the middle character in the necklace is the letter "A". To me, it looks more like some kind of symbol
@Laplegal37 ай бұрын
Have you talked with the authenticating department of eBay?
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
There wouldn't have been any point. It wasn't good practice but not illegal.
@blackghostart3087 ай бұрын
The one thing that got me is that the style of hood isn't one she was known to wear in her lifetime, at least according to the descriptions of her dress I've heard from other history channels that read out written descriptions from her lifetime.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
She actually did wear a gable hood. She chose to be depicted in one for the 1534 medal and wore one to her execution.
@blackghostart3087 ай бұрын
@@anneboleynfiles I was referring more to the descriptions of her when she first returned to England and the lost original that was used as references for the well accepted paintings of her. Sorry for any confusion. I'm not always the best at wording things effectively.
@wwirelesswwizard5 ай бұрын
The fact that Tracy Borman & Alison Weir both were fooled doesn't surprise me, since the only modern Tudor "historian" that I think is worse than either of them is Philipa Gregory. I could write an essay about how unreliable I find those two, but I'll probably save that for another time.
@jamesaron19677 ай бұрын
This portrait isn't of Anne Boleyn but an attractive woman whoever she was.
@xavisanchez75227 ай бұрын
ABR= Anne of Brittany, mother of Elizabeth and cousin of Caterina, in other words the Catalan speaking connection of the House of Barcelona/Darragon( both Catalan native speakers)
@suziemartin35877 ай бұрын
This is not Queen Anne
@Shane-Flanagan7 ай бұрын
50+ pounds well spent there Claire 😉 I can tell you're still very much pleased with your purchase 😉
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
It was an amazing deal!!!
@Shane-Flanagan7 ай бұрын
@@anneboleynfiles Lol 😂
@simon1127 ай бұрын
as beautiful and elegant as the lady in the portrait is, she in my opinon looks older than 35 I could be wrong queen Anne was about 35 when she died, just my honest opinion.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Yes, me too.
@morgainedepolloc41617 ай бұрын
Now I possibly can have a portrait of my grandmother Joan Fitzalan!! I already have a copy of the portrait of grandfather George Neville. Don't think I will be purchasing the copy from Mr. Jones!😂. Thank you!
@spookycat85567 ай бұрын
Wasn’t Anne depicted wearing a gable hood on the Most Happy medal? Also I thought she wore one at her execution. I may be wrong about that though. I only bring this up because I keep seeing comments about Anne never wearing one. I have just seen you have covered the medal! I should be more patient!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Yes, that's right, she chose to wear one for the 1534 medal and for her execution.
@graphiquejack7 ай бұрын
When I saw Weir's attribution of the portrait as Anne, I immediately wrote a comment actually pointing out a lot of the same arguments against it. I don't believe this is Anne in any way shape or form, unlike the two Holbein sketches which I am pretty convinced are. I agree with you on almost everything, but I firmly believe in the 1507 birthdate. LOL
@fondasarff97018 күн бұрын
One wonders if two portraits of differtent women of a similar age and class, done in the same era by the same artist or artists of the same school, might, in a century or two, be confused for each other.
@Shane-Flanagan7 ай бұрын
Oh, question, you mentioned Regina. Could Anne use Regina in a title or signature etc as a Queen Consort rather than a reigning Queen in her own right?
@sarahhardcastle24337 ай бұрын
Yes she could, queens if they are sovereigns in their own right or consorts are known as Regina.
@octavianpopescu47767 ай бұрын
Yes, regina means queen, without distinction between regnant or consort. Usually in signatures, where it's used, you'd see the letter R alone, Elizabeth I signed her name Elizabeth R. Others would just use the English version signing their name followed by "the Quene" (that's how they spelled it). R is also used in royal cyphers. That's a logo with the initial of the monarch, the number and R. If you look at a beefeater uniform, you'll see it on their chest E II R - Elizabeth II Regina or C III R - Charles III Rex.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Yes, Regina was also used by consorts.
@robinhumphrey26927 ай бұрын
I heard or read someplace that Henry VIII went out of his way to get rid of references to Anne Boelyn after her death. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but it would go to explain why there are so few images of her, I think.
@rikki19607 ай бұрын
Provenance is everything!
@Jess-bee7 ай бұрын
Anyone else see a resemblance to queen Elizabeth though? I do
@pheart23817 ай бұрын
If it was her it would have been clearly labeled on the portrait itself I think.
@sheaforest93097 ай бұрын
A little bit but it's probably because it's a relative.
@Jess-bee7 ай бұрын
@@pheart2381 oh I don’t think it’s either Elizabeth or Anne, but some of the facial features remind me of Queen Elizabeth’s portraits
@myladyswardrobe7 ай бұрын
@@pheart2381 Not possible to be Elizabeth as the fashion is first quarter of the 1520s. (Bess Chilver)
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I think you could say that about quite a few women though.
@xhinopenielsastre53236 ай бұрын
We can't be sure if this portrait is Anne Boleyn or not.
@anneboleynfiles6 ай бұрын
We can't.
@Siansonea7 ай бұрын
Sounds like Howard Jones just wanted to make a quick buck. I think everything about the claim is ridiculous. Love the shade in this video. 😆
@lavelleklobes65617 ай бұрын
No
@AndriaBieberDesigns7 ай бұрын
So it sounds like this guy just printed off a picture he found online and lied to everybody that he had the actual painting he sounds like a crook
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
It does appear to be a photo of his print, but it was a rip-off for a photo.
@helenberrington7 ай бұрын
My guess would be Agnes Tilney dowager duchess of Norfolk no particular evidence to support the theory except she was grand enough I believe wore red at Anne's coronation and was of an older generation so a hood a year or two out of date may not have been so significant to her provided it conveyed an air wealth and status. I doubt we will ever find out but i don't believe it's Anne. Thank you for an interesting video.
@pheart23817 ай бұрын
Doesnt look anything like her. Nope,not even slightly.
@peachygal41537 ай бұрын
The eldest Anne was supposed to be at death was maybe 36 but many assume younger, right? In that portrait that woman looks she is her 50's.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Yes, the oldest would have been about 35 if you go with the 1501 birthdate.
@tammieswindells53337 ай бұрын
you rock girlfriend thats why i love you
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Aw, thank you!
@SurferJoe17 ай бұрын
A triumph of dogged scholarship over wishful thinking and commercial enterprise.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@britanniau.k.43527 ай бұрын
I dont think this is a portrait of Anne.The angle of the eyebrows and their positioning on the forehead is nothing like other depictions of Anne- in particular-the Holbein sketch.. thumbs down from me....
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@AnneFoggensteiner5 ай бұрын
Looks nothing like her. I wonder if a real portrait exists in some stately home somewhere. Would they all need to have been destroyed?
@historybarf7 ай бұрын
If Tracy Borman is convinced, then so am I.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I don't know whether she stands by that comment now, that was eight years ago. I respect her but I'd go with an art historian over a historian on something like this.
@timhazeltine32567 ай бұрын
Why? Borman is not an art historian and has not publicized any evidence confirming the portrait is Anne. Also, I find it somewhat specious a precise identification can be made via prints which vary in detail, instead of an examination of the original art work.
@historybarf7 ай бұрын
@@timhazeltine3256 Tracy Borman is most definitely a historian
@wendychavez53487 ай бұрын
A historian is not necessarily the same as an art historian. I am a model, though that doesn't mean I can draw or paint more than a passable stick figure. Once, I watched a lady paint me in a multiple-day sitting; until the very last break,I was fascinated by her unique treatment and wild colors, though the finished work looked much like most of the other paintings that week. An art historian would understand about the methods this artist used and how such an abstract treatment ended up looking so ... normal? A regular historian might not.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
@@wendychavez5348 yes, historians can certainly help with the process of identifying a portrait but an art historian is the expert.
@petermercury7 ай бұрын
Doesn't look like Jodie Turner-Smith, so no.
@Drayton6277 ай бұрын
Why do you sneer when you talk?
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
?
@Drayton6277 ай бұрын
@anneboleynfiles Your facial expression not inner intention.
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
@@Drayton627 that's just my face
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
But thanks for brightening my day
@chasegordonn7 ай бұрын
I sent you an email several months back pertaining to a video that was quite popular. It was talking about an image being a real image of Queen Anne. I feel as if it was not real, and they tried to sensationalize that hype. Pardon me for that. I was just so very excited because it seemed very convincing. However I feel people are doing things to get views. When in fact it hurts the actual research, and the people trying to find answers. I am so sorry Claire that you got that picture after paying that amount. Bless you!
@anneboleynfiles7 ай бұрын
I think we're all so desperate to find a contemporary image of Anne that some people get carried away. Thank you!
@chasegordonn7 ай бұрын
@@anneboleynfilesYou're welcome! I totally agree! Bless you so much! 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹