@@ガッちゃん-i4b That's not how it worked. In fact, the United States government wanted the Soviet government to join the war against Japan as far back as 1943. During the Postdam Conference in July 1945, the United States at first wanted the Soviets to join, but soon the new American president (President Harry S. Truman) regretted it and instead though the atomic bombs could bring the Japanese government to surrender. As long as the United States government could promise the Japanese government that they could keep Emperor Hirohito in charge, the Japanese would agree to surrender, but the Japanese government was more worried about the Soviets joining the war than about the atomic bombs, while Truman was worried that the American public would stop supporting him if he allowed the Japanese Emperor to stay alive. As a result, the first atomic bomb was dropped in Hiroshima even when most of the American army had agreed that it was unnecessary, as they wanted to prove to the Soviets that they would not tolerate any major challenge to American power (especially as the Soviets had requested a lot of territories in both Europe and Asia).
Everyone saw how shameless the Japanese were when they used the word “侵攻”(invade)and they portrayed the Soviet Red Army as the aggressor while they were defending their territory when in fact Manchuria was not Japanese territory at all, it was a land that Japan had taken from China through the war of aggression. The Soviet Red Army's war against Japan was also decided in accordance with the Potsdam Proclamation and the relevant resolutions of the Yalta Conference. The Red Army was the allied army that defeated the Japanese Fascists, not the aggressor, and Japan was the culprit of the war
@eine52 Жыл бұрын
Nope, Russian orcs are the shameless bastards here. They broke their non-aggression pact with Japan at the time. As such, it is nothing wrong to call it invasion. Btw, don't forget that Japan honored the pact with the orcs when the Nazis broke their pact with them in 1941. Nice try, boy.
1945! Tinh thần thượng võ! Không đánh người ngã ngựa! Chẳng thèm đánh người thua (như Cham Pa (a:iong) champion vậy.
@hoangngochieu6171 Жыл бұрын
Một nhận thức có thay đổi! Đó cũng là tinh thần Nga ngố! Đất Mẹ! Nước Cha và Con cùng Với Cả Hai!
@徳三郎と言う名の吉田沙 Жыл бұрын
🇷🇺👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎
@laph505 Жыл бұрын
クタバレ
@鈴木洋子-l5t Жыл бұрын
ANNの社長引退
@siroyiryuu Жыл бұрын
に同意
@雪之丞-s3b Жыл бұрын
工作活動は日本語もっと練習してからやらないと さすが中国クオリティってまた言われちゃうよ
@littlesun28964 ай бұрын
傀儡ではありません。 満洲は満洲です。 満洲の独立を恢復します!
@青霄遠客 Жыл бұрын
The military discipline of the Soviet Union was indeed bad, but the Japanese military and government should be most responsible for the tragedy. If there is no war of aggression, will these dead come where they should not have come? Will he be subjected to such torture and difficulties? Will it still be hated because of usurping the land of other peoples? There is only one reflection on war, and that is the general reflection on militarism that brings crime and destruction.
@eine52 Жыл бұрын
Listen here, boy, this program's main objective is to show why the Soviets were able to move large army rapidly and what the researchers found at the Mongolian borders, not to accuse the Soviets for their cruelty.
@青霄遠客 Жыл бұрын
@@eine52 Oh my god, what do you think a comment section is? Writing for the proposition of video content? Here people can express any opinion. My comment is just a response to those Japanese comments, if you really want to refute me, then respond to my opinion positively.
@青霄遠客 Жыл бұрын
@@ikouyooo9120 I didn't say that the massacre is correct, nor did it defend the Soviet Union. I just made a criticism for those who ignored the Japanese Ministry of Military and government responsibility.
@OnthetableNow Жыл бұрын
@@青霄遠客戦勝国によって一方的に裁判で有罪にされたではありませんか
@青霄遠客 Жыл бұрын
@@OnthetableNow Only the word unilateral was used correctly in your statement. It was the Japanese government that unilaterally invaded the territories of other countries, killed the residents of other countries, and carried out unilateral colonial activities.