Another Top 10 Worst CGI Movie Effects

[@michelleannezapanta]

Yes the cgi is bad for the Scooby-Doo movie, but shaggy has to use 0.000000000000000000001% of his power to make it look good

[@jonathancurbelo9155]

😔

[@ssamm1608]

Agreed

[@oceanmantakemebythehandlea5620]

I don't really like the shaggy meme.

[@oceanmantakemebythehandlea5620]

@@Kurai0zoinks, i will like it now. I don't want him to use even 0. 0000001 %

[@Leizyyz]

True

[@Crunchysopa52]

I've always thought 2003 Hulk CGI was pretty alright-looking, nothing near laughably bad or along the lines of that.

[@Testiculon]

***** Did it look realistic?

[@Crunchysopa52]

I can most certainly respect and agree with that.

[@felipesen5879]

Fat Al What the fuck could be realistic about a big green monster? But for me Hulk 2003 didn't look so cgi like he was in 2008, that one looked like a video game.

[@AdrianManzo]

***** I think is great.! it looks better than The Incredible Hulk... I think they just did it in the wrong green... (it should be a little darker) But I think it looks real.

[@Ravenbones]

Fat Al No movie that uses CGI will ever be realistic. Just enjoy the damn thing. Not even the new HULK in Avengers is realistic. We are talking about a fucking green destroying unstoppable force leaping for miles in the air and smashing through tanks. Just fucking learn to enjoy shit.

[@WatchMojo]

Special thanks to our users Norris Vaughn, Afonso Cardoso Brasil, WatchDogsFan47, DarrenZach, Andrew A. Dennison, Camden Coblentz, gagp, Alexander Page, John St.Andre and ReaderGamerSinger for submitting the idea on our Suggestions Page at WatchMojo.com/suggest

[@theofficialssgssgoku1315]

Do this one Top 10 James bond movies

[@theofficialssgssgoku1315]

+Immortan Joe hey what's the name of the boss from Mad Max:Fury Road because he looks badass

[@alvareznivek2780]

Do mojo people know the all sci-if are the worst right

[@NotHome888]

WatchMojo.com There was the one shot of Will Smith falling down the Chrysler Building in Men in Black 3. Looked fake even on the big screen.

[@DarthVader1321]

Yeah, include CGI Jabba in the worst CG effects list but don't include puppet Jabba (who looks like a pile of shit) on the worst practical effects list

[@joemama2794]

You expect a good cgi in the 1990 come on now.

[@no2153]

True that.

[@Bembel81]

Have you ever seen Jurassic Park? Good CGI was possible.

[@Dos-mv4nv]

@@Bembel81 it sometimes depends on budget

[@reconx86]

@@Dos-mv4nv There was still such a thing as practical effects., which was the way to go before CGI

[@njdevilchild]

@@Bembel81 but JP was a few years later and these were still the early days of CGI

[@WatchMojo]

In case you were wondering how the Mojoholics voted in our poll, see the votes and entries here: www.watchmojo.com/suggest/Top+10+Worst+CGI+in+Movies Note, of course, that viewer votes are just one of the hundreds of data points and variables that we consider and look at when we create our lists. Make sure to sign up and participate on future lists at www.WatchMojo.com/suggest

[@killian9314]

1998's Godzilla-Roland Emmerich

[@ChaosMyth1012]

WatchMojo.com Everything in all the Spy Kids movies

[@theswaff699]

Starwars is an old movie that was god CGI in their time

[@stevem842]

Swaff Corps They aren't talking about the original from '77, they're referring to the Jabba The Hutt they added in for 1997's not-so-special edition re-release

[@gavinnakamura4997]

ChaosMyth1012 and everything in Shark Boy and Lava Girl.

[@Xyriax]

You must include EVERY SINGLE NIGERIAN OR AFRICAN ACTION/HORROR MOVIE EVER MADE BECAUSE THESE MAKE ME DIE OF LAUGHTER

[@mayteexxis]

Yep. You can make whole seasons of top tens from those.

[@akuljamwal3085]

TIGER MAFIA!

[@crimsonhunter7598]

@@akuljamwal3085 supah kicker!!! Bruce U

[@akuljamwal3085]

@Alan Velociraptor Who Killed Captian Alex

[@weirdostick8023]

Also filipino Action movies

[@toffee6262]

You clearly haven't seen any African movies....

[@lsdadiccion]

Search up Ugandan cgi at it's finest

[@capraffe]

Why am seeing ur profile everywhere

[@jasonchilado]

DarkShade Playz yea fr i’m seeing it everywhere too

[@dorimace]

Imtihal Uddin ur stupid,because alot of people use that pfp

[@CarnivorousPlantsAndGardening]

@@toffee6262 looks like someone's stayed up past their bedtime 🙄

[@ark6286]

Am I the only one who think that Hulk 2003 shouldn't be here

[@walterwhite7677]

Yes

[@loonygloomster4508]

You're not the only one, bro.

[@loonygloomster4508]

@@walterwhite7677 You're messed up.

[@StompProductions01]

Yes

[@latoyasmith3581]

I agree

[@andrewshieh0712]

How about the wolves in Twilight?

[@Lamadredetuamigo]

And the fake girl.

[@michael_underwood]

Or the animals in life of Pi

[@malcolmboyd3467]

+Serge Kent haha

[@sadakopilled]

+Andrew Shieh Or baby Renesmee in Twilight.

[@abu269]

+Serge Kent That CGI baby in Twilight was just plain freaky! What harm would it have done if they used a real baby?

[@supermovies4625]

"Yet it's no wonder Marvel is supreme". Then you show clips of The Hulk and Origins Wolverine.

[@supermovies4625]

***** I though they were referring to Marvel movies in general. Ya know, movies based on Marvel Comics.

[@GeorgeBack02]

Oh haiiiiiiii again.

[@supermovies4625]

George Back Oh hai George

[@GeorgeBack02]

Remy "Gambit" LeBeau It seems to me like you're the eeeexxxpert Remy.

[@supermovies4625]

George Back You'rre verey welcum George. And kep in mind, if you have anny problem. Talk to me and I wi hep you.

[@elitebelt]

Most of these movies are 1. Very old and 2. CGI was very expensive at the time. So saying movies like Langoliers (1995), Scooby-Doo (2002), Deep Blue Sea, (1999) all had relatively low budgets that wouldn't have been able to afford much better CGI. Secondly, some movies are better looking that way, like Scooby-Doo. I mean, it's a kid's movie, most movies made for kids look like that because it's goofy, and most kids like goofy. Also, seriously? Did the Langoliers really break the fucking movie? That's just stupid. It's like less than 5 minutes and they aren't as bad as some of the CGI on this list. If 5 minutes of less than decent CGI ruins a movie for you, then you have some fuckin' problems. Also the snakes from SoaP were pretty decent for it's time, so having it on the HM is pretty ridiculous.

[@SexyButCurious]

Lieutenant Nomad Exactly... the CGI in those movies still look good. The one from Deep Blue Sea, both MK films and MMPR film looks like shit now!!!

[@marcusthatcher6228]

***** King's IT suffered in the same way. Genuinely creepy movie with a genuinely creepy clown. Then it morphs into this claymation monstrosity that, even as a kid, I thought was funny.

[@Ravenbones]

Lieutenant Nomad Jurassic Park has Animatronics. Only 10% of the movie was CGI, unfair to use. CGI is easy when only 10% of the object needs it. We are talking about things made 100% of CGI.

[@theshadowcyberman3358]

Doesn't mean they still look bad.

[@lenisemicolon]

Actually if you look at the pure CGI in Jurassic Park, some of its pretty unrealistic (but doesn't take you out of the movie). When they're running from the pack of Gallimimus' those are all CGI and look great, but when they hide behind a log the log looks like it's lifted from an early 2000s video game.

[@spear9141]

Some people: Africa Philippines: *_Allow us to introduce ourselves_*

[@SethAtSNK]

As a filipino *i agree*

[@JessieJamesTan]

@monokuma is OwO that is bad

[@JessieJamesTan]

@monokuma is OwO and some of philippine tv series

[@huji-rf8hn]

@monokuma is OwO i agree but it was old bad equipment before

[@huji-rf8hn]

@monokuma is OwO ew

[@schleda7372]

You are comparing 1990’s movies with 2015 movies

[@multiyapples]

Brawl With Ömer 2015. This video came out in 2015. That argument is invalid.

[@pamelahaskell5788]

I know

[@ikaris2607]

Green Lantern was made in 2011

[@SadAndVengeful]

Don't expect much from a woman.

[@LennonBlake]

I think it’s meant to be an “of all time’ usage of cgi. The Jurassic Park example is the best representation.

[@MaCabaret]

Yeah I dunno why the wolverine claws sucked. It's not like they'd already done it 3 times.

[@christopherbuckley5929]

It's because the producers had an animation studio that had no experience doing live action to do the effects on the film.

[@Diedpied]

TheoneandonlyCrowMan I think they tried to make them look new, but made them look extensively fake.

[@obzcure]

The worst part was there was the precgi leak of the film where the claws were prosthetic and looked way better.

[@clydefrosch]

TheoneandonlyCrowMan its mainly because another company did it and the company got less money than the old one

[@Michelle-DiPalo]

The problem was that the movie was rushed because of the leaked bootleg that they didn't have time to clean everything up.

[@clorox1676]

"You can actually see the pixels".

[@cocoduck7745]

i just saw that movie to be honest movie was great i was on edge of my seat until i saw those "pixels" it was game over for me

[@4Astaroth]

Yeah the Langoliers look bad but I just love that movie. :) And the bad CGI just makes me forget how disturbing and dangerous the situation for them is. It makes them look kind of scary but not as dangerous as maybe some practical puppets or some shit today.

[@kennythedirteater9367]

The thumbnail looks like when a 17 year old tries making a meme

[@cobaliciousd3233]

*7

[@soup6381]

*4

[@youraveragefloridaboy519]

*5

[@ankur9254]

70*

[@YoungCoward]

*9

[@TehBurek]

I still don't think original Hulk's CGI deserves the bashing it's now getting seemingly everywhere.

[@Owlero]

Agreed. For 2003, it wasn't THAT bad

[@rdmgurgs]

I agree. It really wasn't all that bad. I liked the CG actually.

[@FanaticalRanger]

Austin Hussey 2003 was the same year that Lord of The Rings Return of The King came out and the CGI in that film is still great, 2003 Hulk wasn't that great - it could have been worse but saying you should just ignore that it was bad just because it came out so long ago doesn't change anything :D

[@brandonthrasherexodus]

I totally agree too, and so with spawns cape

[@rdmgurgs]

Brandon Bohn Spawns Cape was awesome! I don't even know why it's on this list.

[@stufaman]

I don't mind bad CGI if it gets the event across well enough. Langoliers functioned well enough to tell the story imo. Look at The Mask. Cg as hell but it was bloody good fun watching it. But yes, some movies from the 70s and 80s still look more convincing than recent blockbusters.

[@stufaman]

MrSmiley9432 When CG is treated as an art, rather than trying to be too realistic. I think it can work quite well.

[@stufaman]

MrSmiley9432 I still haven't seen that one. Here's a couple for me. The much slated Transcendence and Lucy. Very OTT, but for me they told a fun story.

[@stufaman]

MrSmiley9432 Lucy's CG was a little ropey in places. But for me it was good, mindless fun. Try it and you'll see what I mean. Transcendence is a similar concept. It features Jonny Depp being transferred to a computer and tries to run the world. The CG functions well enough IMO. I'll check out Sin City. Also 300 is a good example. It doesn't try to be realistic.

[@adam985185]

+stufaman Nah, the CGI from it's sequel (SOTM) is even worse!

[@stufaman]

Adam Cederblad I haven't seen it yet. But I'm contemplating it out of morbid curiosity.

[@MattMzansi]

Holy tits , I remember watching Mortal Kombat when I was 6 and was like "WOAH" when that scene came up. lol looking at it now and I'm like wtf hahahaa.

[@Zorro9129]

You watched MK when you were 6?

[@MattMzansi]

Zorro9129 lol yeah why? At the cinema even.....

[@Zorro9129]

MattMzansi I just think it peculiar that one is allowed to watch something so violent at a young age.

[@MattMzansi]

Zorro9129 We played the game to death so the transition to watching the movie was a must. My parents weren't strict but if they never allowed me, I would have gone myself anyways lol

[@Zorro9129]

MattMzansi Gee, I'm not sure if your parents looked at the gory game you brought home. Did they think that "Mortal Kombat" meant anything but a fight to the death? I don't intend to sound derogatory, I simply notice that this type of upbringing is too common.

[@tattieverb265]

If there's one thing you can give to green lantern... It's getting ryan Reynolds in the superhero area and land him a roll as deadpool.

[@SkeweredGlaive]

Yeah. Then land him a spot into becoming a pokémon to boot as well.

[@ididntmeantoshootthatvietn5012]

It's like downloading chrome from internet explorer

[@zimmygirl777]

@@SkeweredGlaive Deadpool the Great Electric Mouse Detective.🐭⚡

[@aabattery4092]

I honestly don’t think that Parallax was made that bad

[@katemartin4648]

Me niether

[@knockemboygaming1637]

Me too

[@jennrockmusik6305]

YEP!

[@zoib4289]

Xvortex EXE me neither

[@hellofellas6565]

I agree

[@mrpythagoras7079]

11:30 Did NOT expect it to sound like that😂😂😂

[@addieeeson]

Sir o Me when I don’t get my food

[@Hufo-yp8zp]

Me when my family goes to the store but they don't buy something to me :v

[@jacobaurelius5361]

When you slip a surprise finger in

[@adrianhernandez1328]

When 8 year olds play cod

[@chrome1018]

Sir platinium same XD

[@brentage5000]

You talk about bad CGI in Scooby-Doo, and yet instead of talking about the horrendous looking dog that's present throughout the whole movie, you just focus on one thing that takes up about five minutes of movie at most.

[@ninjazillagamer9961]

Brent Dreher THEY TRIED, UNLIKE THE FACE STRETCH SCENE

[@flurrypawz]

Brent Dreher body shaming scooby! They did an amazing job with scooby.

[@kamikazekyre6101]

It's a kid's movie. Kids don't need realistic details when it comes to fictional movie.

[@nishakohli2975]

I loved Scooby doo

[@osmanbarber3655]

they tried to make scooby look cartoony...

[@thedinonugget2927]

Old pixelated PlayStation game... disrespect my childhood one more time 😑

[@alanquartey5539]

TheDinoNugget 9:52 Gave me goosebumps

[@josiahsegovia04]

Disgusting

[@noob_saibotxx5886]

YEAH RESPECT MORTAL KOMBAT 11 AND MARVELS SPIDER-MAN BECAUSE THEY CAME OUT IN THE PS4

[@ddcgjrii4972]

No one likes ps1

[@magentapurpleyap5566]

*Loads LMG with childhoid intent*

[@LanokirX]

Honestly, the langolier scared the shit out of me as a kid.

[@Shadow_Grandmaster]

LanokirX same I used to go around to blockbusters looking for the movie. It was never available half the time!

[@KikujiroChan]

I had nightmares as a kid about that shit ;__;

[@alannacammack2359]

me too!!! it took me maybe 5 years to really stop being scared. lol I randomly think about it to this day.

[@patrickblackwell777]

Lol same here!

[@jwyse1132]

LanokirX me to

[@10191927]

Ah, Green Lantern. The 300 million dollar turkey.

[@sfighter0085]

Marth Yep, makes me glad to hear a reboot is slated for 2020.

[@GANTZ100pts]

sfighter00 I hope they plan on using practical effects this time, and no CGI costume and mask. As practical effects can look bounds better then CGI, provided the props don't look like crap. Hell its one of the main reasons the first Jurassic Park movie looks better then the others, as around 90% of all the dinos where actual props including the T-Tex.

[@occiferjehons2329]

GANTZ100pts You're kidding, right? Have you seen any good superhero movie that only used practical effect which doesn't look either goofy as shit or straight up bad?

[@GANTZ100pts]

Occifer Jehons I ment for costumes, and other easy-ish models that are better off as a real model.

[@axeltahir9885]

Occifer Jehons *cough..The Dark Knight series...*

[@sx-gb5gu]

We can't blame old schools

[@bananaman9806]

When you step on ur dog's tail: Your dog 11:31

[@scottslogic]

LOL

[@Талсе]

Hulk was not bad at all

[@no_biggie_smalls]

Not bad just boring

[@ziraqkeren9998]

In its era

[@martinveloche1228]

That movie was really fun and the cgi can't be compare with Green lantern, maybe the Hulk color skin was to saturated and rendering wasn't enough but the movie as a whole is interesting.

[@bensilicate]

All these FX are not bad at all. WatchMojo is stupid.

[@neokai5511]

Not bad? IT WAS AWSOME. In my opinion, it's the best Hulk film I've seen and the best Hulk. It's cool, sad, interesting and something worthy of watching over again. The Marvel's latest Hulks just don't have that cool factor to them, like Hulk doesn't look as irradioactive no more, and he doesn't grow in power like he did.

[@GetToDaChoppa-k5r]

You basically said that low budget films like Sharknado wont be on the list, but you went ahead and put on Anaconda 3 ha ha ha

[@deathzombine]

+no hassle I thought she said movies that tried a honest effort and isn't a B Movie would be in the list. But Anaconda 3 is apparently a B Movie according to the comments so yeah.

[@WatrDragn]

+deathzombine It might've been because it still "tried." When your film premise is a 'Sharknado' it's up for debate whether the material was taken seriously. It takes a bit of commitment to film a third installment of a made-for-tv third installment about a giant person-eating snake.

[@raptureexpands1731]

Star was new hope was actually low budget

[@robctfbe1550]

This list is pretty messed up. Like what the hell,would you expect a old movie to have Infinity war quality?

[@b-moviebrian49]

Exactly, this list is pretty stupid. Complaining about bad cgi in movies from the late '90's and early 2000's?! Of course its gonna look like shit. I could see them listing big budget Hollywood movies from the last couple of years but not most of the movies on this list.

[@blanketfort]

Frizzurd uh you do know that the dinosaurs they used in Jurassic Park isnt CGI right?

[@ruralfusion473]

blanket fort it is

[@blanketfort]

As far as I know, the T-rex was a life-sized animatronic

[@MrHeiska01]

Dinos in Jurassic Park are mix of animatronic, shit ton of clay and CGI. Thats why they look good, because you never sould go full CGI!

[@daggerrealm4244]

The Green Lantern Fight Isn't Even That Bad. The CGI Effect Looks Perfect.

[@houselik]

You're right.

[@spadeoface860]

True

[@camaromarl]

It's just the fan of the other side

[@latinogamer1012]

GD Notalegist I'm a fan of Marvel but I can agree Green Lantern shouldn't be on this list

[@adamftw5211]

@@latinogamer1012 same

[@callahaine100]

Haha I forgot Wolverine claws, this looks like a toon effect from "Who framed Roger Rabbit"!

[@eyjafjalajokull9046]

true

[@galaxynova9144]

haha I just watched the lamgilerires

[@3Rayfire]

Who framed Roger Rabbit had superior visual effects.

[@ljsmithyy6399]

Galaxy nova langoliers

[@Inaworldoflove]

they look like the new apps you can get that ad CGI to your selfie in realtime.

[@bilboshaggins3966]

Oh come on Star Wars was made in 1977, our phones are more powerful than the technology they had back then

[@ducky-cb1pm]

Yea true

[@josehuaman6603]

They are talking about Jabba's scene that was included in the Special Edition, 20 years later.

[@militarydude711]

Jose Huaman yeah but it doesn’t even look that bad like what idek why they included it I thought it was a good scene

[@MaxSchmidGame]

SERIOUSLY

[@nestor1907]

ANOTHER NIHILUS BROTHER

[@RhysJ171]

Numbers 10, 9, 8 and 7 aren't that bad

[@Kelsoatron]

Agreed

[@mncdssctn9110]

The Star Wars one was terrible... I've seen amateur film-makers in front of a green screen making their background look more realistic than the scene with Han and Jabba.

[@iainjames03]

MncDssctn it wasn't the background that was the issue - that was a practical effect. The CGI was having change to some chubby actor in a furry scarf into an animated version of the design they finally settled on for ROTJ. And then realising that when Harrison Ford walks behind him he'd be walking on Jabba's tail.

[@UncleExplosion]

Rhys's Miscellaneous Videos Scooby Doo was terrible in general, and the claws had pretty much no reflection what so ever.

[@GrayWoIf]

Iain Meldrum what really kills me is that Han says Jabba you're a wonderful human being.....even if that's supposed to be sarcastic why would he call him a human.

[@mamoon08]

Love how you expect 2019 CGI from movies made in the 1900's or 2000 CGI for 1900 CGI

[@JeremyRedus]

Top 10 bad movie CGI effects 10: Reality

[@nb5437]

Nah. Reality looks almost.....lifelike

[@starrykailani]

@@nb5437 we just lower the resolution

[@BillyBob-jy1gv]

How did you know 😯

[@R3troZone]

The shark from Escape from LA was supposed to look fake. It was the animatronic shark from the Jaws ride. Which is why they showed him passing through the wreckage of Universal Studios. God you people really stretch for these nit picky lists.

[@Richard_Nickerson]

Yeah, but that entire scene looked like it came out of a PS1 game

[@CapHowdy]

Plus the whole point of this film was to make it look like a b-movie.

[@Isatino]

Where are the Spy Kids movies?!

[@GloomyFish]

Not to mention Shark Boy and Lava Girl who was made by the same people as Spy Kids... That film had crap CGI (it was still my favourite film for like two years though, despite knowing it wasn't really the best)

[@AlejandroMorales-cu3uk]

I was making the same question -_-

[@Isatino]

aliroseart George Lopez is a great villain :D

[@jackpark9463]

The CGI was awful, but it's because Robert Rodriguez films have a crew of like 5 people. But yeah, it looks like garbage.

[@gameman9706]

They are alright though

[@abhilashsinharoy6351]

You missed. Mummy 2: Scorpion King scene.

[@vkishan2089]

It was in the first part

[@Sansygirl04]

We don't speak of that one

[@idhamdaud366]

@@vkishan2089 it was second

[@shrishikesh2292]

@@idhamdaud366 there is another video in the same topic. And you can find that movie there

[@jevinday]

that was the #1 choice for the first video on this topic.

[@MightyKrizpp]

I think there was nothing wrong with the CGI in The Hulk (2003)..

[@supersaiyanjalil]

Ikr it looked so real.

[@SonOfQueenMyrrah]

It was a lot better than the newer one. Just had that feel to it.

[@hobobob59]

SonOfQueenMyrrah oh come the fuck on. No way anyone can say Hulk was better than The Incredible Hulk. The pacing in Hulk was horrendous. I loved that movie when I was younger, but going back, its borderline unwatchable.

[@akrybion]

MightyKrizpp I don't know, the transformation wasn't that bad, but the Hulk himself looked very freakish and way less realistic and detailed as the new one does. And the scene where he throws that tank looks horrible, but I think that is more because of the ludicrous physics there.

[@pyrrhus4078]

MightyKrizpp compared to films in 2003 , yes you r right

[@brentage5000]

I'd actually like them to remake Langoliers today, because it's a good story that deserves decent effects

[@nomeaknat]

I second this.

[@manudelmarche]

Are you serious?

[@aic8326]

Hell yes!

[@dylanlancaster3065]

I loved The Langoliers at the time.

[@jamiebraswell5520]

Dylan Lancaster , yes the first time...the excellent novella. The movie was flat, dull, filled with generic actors giving poor performances, and some awful SFX.

[@KeyQuantum]

Unpopular opinion: I think the langoliers look scary, like imagine if you actually saw them in real life, yeah they look goofy cuz y'know, it's 1995, but seriously those things in real life would be terrifying.

[@radenakbar]

yep. I watched it as an elementary schooler back then and it freaked me out. But thanks to this video I now know the movie title after the first time watching it since 21 years ago...

[@ivantanaka5718]

i agree, i will cry for that movie, especially after looking at those cgi

[@winterlynn9012]

The story itself was creepy and even scary to me as a kid but as soon as I saw the actual langoliers design it ruined everything for me. Even by 1995 standards that was horrible Cgi! Jurassic park came out 2 years prior and still holds up. But then again the langoliers was a made for tv movie so it had nowhere near the budget it would have had if it was a theatrical release.

[@NoThing-ry7cr]

Deadfish King exactly

[@UnKNoWn-oe6it]

Wolverine cgi maybe little bit wired..but that was the blockbuster movie❤❤ Wolverine fans here??

[@SuperEagles97]

I'm thinking that in of these videos there is the whole movie of "The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl." Fuck that movie.

[@SuperEagles97]

Kevin S Or any Spy Kids movies.

[@SuperGuldo]

Kevin S i liked it so fuck you m8

[@MultiSuperllama]

You think its the best thing ever as a kid. The adult life hits you. Right in the CGI

[@SuperEagles97]

Horest Gump Foh m9 MultiSuperllama Even when I was a kid I hated it. The CGI was so fucking bad that even as a kid I knew that. It's such a pain when they show them in Disney Channel.

[@SuperEagles97]

***** Fuck that movie too.

[@brentonp666]

don't make the suit green... and animated

[@TelestroArchive]

Deadpool!

[@dbp2625]

OR animated

[@lordspookems187]

Every thing wrong with X men origins: Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool Deadpool

[@shadowplayer3940]

+Professor Mint Deadpool was a good movie

[@madijelli1416]

+Shadowplayer Best He's talking about the Deadpool that appeared in X-Men Origins

[@hatduken5421]

I disagree with most of this shit. Much of this looked great for it's time. When these movies were made, alot of this CGI was cutting edge for the time and the best they could do - many of us had never even seen CGI in movies at all before this and only in intro's to games. Stuff like Toy Story and Antz were the only animated CGI movies that existed. Saying now that it's shit.. well of course, look at any 3D game on the PS1 - most of them look like vomit, but at the time they looked great. I'm just pointing out that this video is portraying as if they had the same technology and skills as they do now.

[@jaylow5149]

Word. Especially number 9. It was made in 1997 and they complaining about seeing the CGI? Wtf? If you complain about this, people behind WatchMojo, then do it better with the tools of today. I mean 1997 man.

[@hatduken5421]

JAYLOW yep exactly. much of this was the testing ground for CGI. I'd rather them talk about modern movies where the technology is available, but the CGI is crap.

[@WatchGeek]

Hat Duken so true!

[@Wielkobabita]

Well, they didn't even show the true 1997 Jabba. It was the 2004 one, 1997 one looked far worse and 2004 wasn't really that bad. It could be more slippery, eyes should be wider and more red and he should have some slime around his mouth, yet he was actually quite good and completely not like in a video game. Look at 2004's Star Wars KotOR 2 and its Hutts with spiky foreheads. Comparing movie Jabba to video game Vogga would be an insult for the first one and a compliment for the latter. 2004 Jabba was quite realistic, he could use some slime on his skin, but it was you who made it look worse. You chose the blurry 2004 edition where Jabba seems unnaturally crispy as compared to the evnviroment, whereas the same CGI Jabba on 2011 crispy Blu-Ray version looks far more natural, as it has got closer crispness level to his enviroment.

[@neildennis575]

Good for its time? Jurassic Park was in 1993 and looks incredible for today! This was the result of people not taking the time needed to make the CGI work convincingly with the scene.

[@nordicpawsproductions465]

the langoliers still scared the shit out of me back in the 90's even if it was CGI

[@VeronicaValentine2236]

I’d be terrified if I saw those floating around or coming at me!

[@jbro8934]

The Langoliers are bad by today's standards. But for 1995 they were great! Those things were scary as fuck.

[@BluesFanatic]

J Bro my search has come to an end. I finally found this stupid movie after watching it on tv 7 years ago.

[@Trollamollex]

@@BluesFanatic Dude there are like 7 other people here saying that they have been looking for that movie since forever lol.

I'm yet another one who looked for that movie haha

[@OmarConstruct]

Same I've been searching for that stupid movie since I saw it years ago.

[@truehare]

I love that movie, but even back then, I thought the Langoliers looked awful. TBH, I still think practical effects can't be beaten (not even today) when it comes to horror movies.

[@calebhu6383]

Birdemic should be number one,

[@barke1993]

this movie is called another top 10 worst. movie cgi effects, birdemic is nr 1 on the first one

[@calebhu6383]

No it isn't. I watched both.

[@adeadchannel4129]

birdemic was an indie movie.

[@dragoncatthebest3965]

Caleb Hu

[@Hamletstwin]

That's no excuse for how bad the CGI was

[@MrMattogreen25]

The claws were fine, but the ladder scene was horrible.

[@JonCombo]

She's a adamantium expert though.

[@lizzielizzrd]

i think the last fight on top of the big "chimney" is waaaaaay the worst.

[@BeengoVEVO]

I saw his finger go past the claws when he touched the tip of the claws

[@deaclavilis6760]

The claws were not fine. They are barely OK. The ladder scene is different story. It was a disaster.

[@damianpintado1184]

2:07-2:13 *how it feels to chew five gum*

[@CheseBitez]

Chew five gum stimulates your senses

[@thehand5761]

I challenge WatchMojo.com to make a movie with CGI...

[@omarpikm2101]

they would fuck up even more

[@hehet-seriesmorelikel-seri9937]

Lol ikr

[@mircealopataru3860]

Lmao triggered much ?

[@tox1c989]

Lol

[@cgplayz545]

Ikr... I honestly don’t know why they put the jabba scene here... IT’S A FUCKING 1970’s SCENE WTF DO YOU EXPECT!!!!!!

[@OriginalNeoSupreme]

I almost didn't make it past the Birdemic in the intro.

[@calebbaumtm1915]

Why am I the only one who didn't mind the Green Lantern CGI? Hell I actually liked the CGI! What I didn't like was the story

[@andrewgiordano6880]

it hurt my eyes

[@nileshgupta5348]

same here

[@lianzamazathang3508]

go see a doctor

[@BeengoVEVO]

Caleb BaumTM yeah I thought that scene was pretty neat

[@bandeirarv]

Same here, my dude

[@randomsecrets]

a good "Bad CGI example" list could go like this: EDIT: Forgot to add 1 more Green Lantern 1 Green Lantern 2 Green Lantern 3 Green Lantern 4 Green Lantern....

[@sndsh1061]

Are ya Ryan Reynolds??

[@hckingking]

True, cgi in green lantern was ugly

[@BlueAustinMaxi]

IT WAS 1997 IT WAS FINE FOR ITS TIME (lol I rhymed)

[@Richard_Nickerson]

Jurassic Park was 1993 and is better than things on this list from after 2000. And CGI work for Lord of the Rings began in 1998. So, your point is invalid.

[@codecmgs]

@@Richard_Nickerson actually Jurassic Park had a 63 million dollar budget(over 100 million in 2018 money)and Lord of the Rings had 93 millions(over 130 million) in todays money. This was a really nitpicky list yet there are plenty of bad CGI examples.

[@Richard_Nickerson]

@@codecmgs Ok? Those numbers mean nothing if you don't look up the budgets of these movies as well, and then figure out how much went to CGI in all of them.

[@Richard_Nickerson]

@@codecmgs I never said they were low budget examples either, so your "actually" as if you're correcting me? Stupid.

[@codecmgs]

@@Richard_Nickerson you told another person their point is invalid. Again, I stated that the big budget was mainly catering towards CGI. If I need to look up the budgets of the films in question, then I will do so to satisfy your need to be petty.

[@alexiatr]

I think Scooby Doo should not be here since it should be a goofy movie and even the effects are bad it just adds to the movie

[@JazzyAnasazi]

OMFG the worst CGI movie ever has to be Food Fight XD LMFAO!

[@MrLuigi002]

556FATHOMS That´s animated. CGI are the special effects in real life movies.

[@JazzyAnasazi]

CGI can be animated for movies too also, im guessing you heard that movie off Jontron? XD

[@MrLuigi002]

556FATHOMS Yeah, and other KZbinrs. But mainly him xD

[@JazzyAnasazi]

other youtubers? XD Lol

[@MrLuigi002]

Nostalgia Critic

[@anthonybarrera463]

As soon as Samuel L Jackson died in Deep Blue Sea, I changed the channel.

[@mnealbarrett]

Scorpion King was left out? That had by far the worst CGI of all time!

[@renewings]

It can't be on two lists.

[@bombasticballoon727]

(Just my opinion) HOW DARE YOU SAY THE CGI SUCKED! I kinda agree. BUT BARELY!

[@philb4462]

It was in their first bad CGI video.

[@frankgarcia9501]

Marc Barrett the dude literally looked like he escaped a ps2 game

[@codybot5151]

mummy returns u mean

[@tarairwin7902]

What about the third 'Jaws' when the shark broke through the glass?

[@matthewcassidy4147]

Tara Irwin That wasn't CGI.

[@420dogma]

Tara Irwin wait just a minute.....there was a Jaws 2 and Jaws 3?

[@tarairwin7902]

dogma420 yep.

[@1r0zz]

Matthew Cassidy though the layering of that special effects have more to do with CGI than practical effects... it was actually a precursor on how CGI would be used...well, even NOW as very lousy example like Days of future past shows us....

[@420dogma]

ya'll don't know what sarcasm is, do you? all the movies after the first were complete crap by the way.

[@Drakonus_]

*Top 10 Worst Top 10 Channels* Now that's irony

[@jeffbolt3757]

Drakonus I suggest mojo gets no 1. The video is just talking shit.

[@mdsr640]

😂😂😂

[@pangjunxiong155]

Holy crap, I've already unsubbed from this shitty channel and blocked it. Now I still see their channel and stupid videos

[@arandomraptor1908]

Inhales 🤚😑 BOI👋😐

[@lutherkingxcxc214]

The Lazy Monday is the worst channel everyone. Because he is copier

[@violentaftervisions3849]

I actually have pretty traumatic memories of Paralax at the time. I was around 7 years old when Green Lantern came out, but the way Paralax sucked out human souls ot whatever, and how their skeletons are shown was always so scary. I'd rather see people being shot than having their souls sucked out. Movie sucks, but still creeps me out to this day.

[@iszac87]

To be fair, the Star War one wasn't really that bad for their time.

[@MechaGodzilla]

The original 1997 Jabba was abysmal. The one in the video is the improved 2004 version, which is much better by comparison.

[@kenbaeza]

I agree

[@unstoppable5559]

Most of these movies are old...give it another 20 years nd cgi from today will look funny/bad, smh...we didn't have the technology we have today 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@nomeaknat]

Considering what was possible over 25 years ago(Jurassic Park) a lot of these fall far short.

[@itschris1364]

Unstoppable 555 A lot of old movies have great cgi even for today. Such as Jurrasic park or Back to the Future

[@ajaysm2902]

nomeaknat look at the movies like jurrassic park terminator and other stuff u always dont need to have good cgi but the way of presenting them also requires art

[@Richard_Nickerson]

"Most" of these movies are "old." 8/13 of the movies are 20 years old or younger; 6/13 are 18 years or younger (61.54% aren't old enough to drink; 46.15% are from the new millennium). I'd say that debunks the "most" part. As for "old", that's a subjective description. Every single one of these movies is younger than I am, so they're automatically not old to me. The oldest addition to this list is from 1995, and that's only 23 years ago (and it was a made for TV mini-series, not a movie). And about half of these movies are from after the year 2000. The statement that "most of these movies are old" is simply false. Especially when older movies (Jurassic Park, 1993) had better effects (effects made by the same people as some of these other installments even!).

[@PanzerYeena]

Birdemic. It has to be Birdemic.

[@drpepper4761]

Does that even count as cgi?

[@GamingGavi]

No best cgi m8 8/8

[@PanzerYeena]

billy snap According to the maker of the film, the CGI is "outstanding" and the birds really do look "Shocking" and "Terrifying"...

[@TheForeignGamer]

Fenrir Birdemic was on their original list for Worst CGI.

[@YukiUzumaki78]

Fenrir Well, they do look shocking and terrifying. Just not in the way the film maker was thinking.

[@cannedmusic]

#8...you're going to complain about Mary Jane in that one spot, and not Scoob in general?

[@mr2ti41]

Lol exactly what I thought too..

[@phobiawitch835]

Yeah, Scoobert was, iffy. Good for when it came out, but is not the best when compared to future similarities. That Mary-Jane monster, while not great, is actually kinda funny now, even though it would be scary in the past.

[@bigjermini]

I hate to say it, but these effects were pretty decent for their time and budget for some, excluding wolverine and Green Lantern. I think it's a combination of the fact that CGI and the artists, get better over time, so the older works don't hold up good when they aren't exactly on par. As well, we tend to hold everything up to Jurassic Park's standards(the first one), even movies that came before it. And really if you watch Avengers, with the knowledge that it's 90% CGI, then watch Jurassic Park, the dino's look fake af, except the mechanical T-Rex. We can't really look at the old movies now and just say the CGI was bad. We have to take into account of other factors as well. When we watched them back then, they didn't look terribly awful or too out of place. The older ones we didn't notice the first time around, but do after better tech and artists came about. Mortal Kombat 1,2 had awesome effects for their time, but look bad now. Lu Kang's dragon animality was a bit off even then, but what was worse was that dang demon noskin beast thing that ate Jade and Jax was beating on. WTF, why the budget had to run out there? Langoliers and Deep blue Sea and Anaconda 3, are SciFi channel movies. They never had good CGI. Lost in Space. The whole movie had bad CGI so the monkey kinda fit in lol. Scooby looked more fake than that girl's skin transform. And the other effects were horrible too. Green Lantern. My guess is they wanted to go more cartoonish, vs MCU's current sort of realistic take. Still waiting on a new GL movie to do it better. Also I didn't know his mask was full CGI so that was actually a win. Birdemic should have been #1 as that was so horrible, even for SciFi channel. Note, I do not support "syfy" spelling, even if that is how the company changed it.

[@bigjermini]

Emmett Brown eh?

[@coreyweatherford3297]

Deep Blue Sea and Langoliers are not sci-fi channel movies dude. I don't even think Anaconda 3 was, pretty sure it was direct go video. Just because they frequently play them doesn't mean they made them. Most of your other points also made little sense. Jurassic Park still looks great for the most part, and so does The Avengers.

[@ralphyetmore]

No. Jurassic Park came out in '93. The CG in that film still holds up. Most of these entries came out years later. I'll only defend HULK as a stylistic decision. Ang Lee was attempting a comic book aesthetic.

[@Sand_Hanitizer05]

I bit long...

[@defiraphi]

Langoliers was a miniseries so it has lower budget . Anaconda 3 is a direct on dvd movie so it is normal that these sort of movies has bad cgi effects . Deep Blue Sea was a decent movie except for that scene with Samuel L Jackson the movie got dumped down wow... also it is an action movie and not science-fiction based . We had better effects back then look how Event Horizon was compared to some years later Hulk and Green Lantern did is very poorly yes . Mortal Kombat Annihilation was a B-movie and also think it was a direct on video as the cheap cgi-effects were a hommage to Ray Harryhausen it has somewhat the same feel . Anyway comparing blockbusters that has millions $ as budget to B-movies, miniseries and direct on dvd that has only thousands $ is silly imo .

[@lilshrimp3104]

11:32 when u stub ur toe

[@baeztwins]

When you step on a lego

[@zodiakgaming3761]

11:31

[@nicholasbrown7000]

Skip on the CGI and go see Mad Max: Fury Road!

[@kimpearce8372]

Lol ur right m8

[@sonicjrjr14]

The sandstorm scene was CG, though.

[@jdswest9405]

sonicjrjr14 but its better than this shit

[@MrKillerswamp]

sonicjrjr14 only when it was really necessary and the sandstorm looked breathtakingly good

[@shawklan27]

YES YES YES YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@slothropgr]

Early CGI but still very bad: Jumanji, Air Force One

[@Dr.Bennet]

I think the hulk cgi is good

[@eban-hn8bu]

agree :)

[@eban-hn8bu]

agree :)

[@Dr.Bennet]

PeanutMan thanks

[@barriee216]

What the fuck, it's worse than fucking 1920s steamboat willy animation!

[@YuniorGamboa]

flip dog the fight scene looks good but that hulk doesn't have a scratch in his body where the incredible hulk was much better like a beast

[@yu.tanaka3322]

11:31 I swear to god I heard a kid at the mall screaming "my tortilla chip" and he screams like this

[@kio7320]

lol

[@airplanenoise1379]

XD THATS FUNNIER THEN TIK TOK AND ROBLOX WOULD BE COMBINED AND SEE HOW BAD IT IS XD

[@Supercatandrewman]

I'm glad you mentioned Spawn this time, but the devil from Spawn should've been number 1!

[@jacksonknight5173]

If you ever diss scooby doo again shaggy will use 0.00000000001% of his power and find you and steal your KZbin channel

[@swaroop7021]

Top ten broke ass people who steal other people's comments

[@cobaliciousd3233]

Top ten people who comment a 6 month old meme

[@swaroop7021]

@@cobaliciousd3233 top ten butthurt people replying to 6 month old meme

[@SakusSaigma]

Watch mojo:scooby doo movies have bad cgi Shaggy:aRe YoU cHaLlEnGiNg Me???

[@swaroop7021]

@@cobaliciousd3233 kid stfu

[@SuccessforLifester]

Langoliers is a very intense and scary film.

[@starryjo5558]

Can't she just "here are some dishonourable mentions" instead of " or in this case..." ? That really annoys me.

[@Owlero]

Yeah. That joke got tired out real quick

[@SirDapper]

Austin Hussey these are all pre-recorded they keep using the same thing they could change it but itd take too much effort

[@BHM_Productions]

Starryjo I've always thought that, too. It's a small complaint, no big deal. But they've been saying "or in this case, dishonorable" for quite a few months now.

[@lablabdrew]

I agree, thank you! Ive been annoyed with this for quite some time now...

[@kimky1957]

Starryjo They're Actually Kind Of Honorable Because They Didn't Make The List

[@ПавелКарев-с8г]

The Langoliers looked fucking terrifying to me as a kid. The concept is sound and the execution was really good for a TV series of that time. It looks dated now but far from Top 2 Worst CGI of all time

[@brentage5000]

Павел Карев I gotta agree. I saw it as a kid and it was my introduction to both the story and David Morse, both of which I still love. Unfortunately, I then found it a couple years ago on Netflix and gave it a rewatch and couldn't believe I had ever been scared of it.

[@josephmoran231]

3:41 When you remember you were supposed to hand in your homework 7 months ago.

[@Maizerus]

The concept of the Langolier monsters were actually really frightening to me (they looked cool in a promo stillshot), just horridly executed by the CGI team. It's like the CGI animators just gave up halfway through finishing them.

[@julesf.meloborges811]

" It's like the CGI animators just gave up halfway through finishing them." More like the money ran out halfway through.

[@Cybeldar]

Well it was a tv mini series. Not like it was a theater release.

[@fireballs6028]

This is nothing compared to Ugandan movie effects

[@IABITVpresents]

Are any African movies from poorer countries ever greatly made? :o

[@grarghov1]

They don't use fx, only lifting clips from the original (1978) Battlestar Galactica series :)))))))

[@pizzayummy3668]

Zoe Tremain-Woodcock stop

[@prismwavves4216]

Fire Balls in pretty sure Ugandan movies don't have a big movie budget like American movies do

[@balalunga1]

Whooo killad captan Alex?

[@panzerkampfwagenvausf.g9469]

The movie with best cgi is who killed captain Alex

[@brandonortiz6466]

Bolbi Stroganosky has

[@ededetudo2879]

Jesus kung fu

[@mr.somebody8070]

Bolbi Stroganosky 😂😂😂i am an African and that is the worst😂😂

[@elpechero4567]

COMANDO, COMANDO!

[@tsuno5916]

Wannabejoeweller 53 hell yeah

[@mike302212]

I remember when the langoliers came out ABC was going to show it and was advertising it as the next great Stephen king whatever. Well the whole family sat to watch and I could still remember everyone laughing when the flying meatballs came out. It was bad we changed the channel quick.

[@johanrochac]

That deep Blue sea scene wasn't terrible. Gtfo

[@Maul1111]

it was fairly bad lol

[@hl8808]

Johan Rocha you’re right it wasn’t terrible... it was ATROCIOUS lol 😂

[@Nazwabezcyfer]

Come on, how can you blame scoobie doo for bad cgi. Its fucking scoobie doo

[@tomlane9744]

Gotta love scooby doo though

[@joshuagonzalez5950]

Nazwabezcyfr Because It Looked horrible

[@super56333]

Judging a CGI from a 90's movie, GG WatchMojo (edit)

[@Hoodied]

IKR

[@aboosermc2794]

Not done with video yet. But if you're talking about the Star Wars part, the cgi in the special edition was made in 1997

[@sandrobindelli5607]

There was no GCI in the '70s...CGI means Computer Generated Imagery and in the 70s the most powerful videocard was only 256 colors (experimental, commercial was max 8 colors). You probably mean Special FX.

[@LeoBladini]

sometimes when you are a movie director and you see that the final result is ugly as fuck, as a movie director, you have to decide to change it. fuck. in the 70's there where the original Star Wars, and they effects were good looking

[@DrEggz]

Yeah that part in deep blue sea is funny because he's like inspirational speech and the shark is like "ain't nobody got time for that"

[@DustinBKerensky97]

I disagree with the list. Everything in the 1990s should be stricken from the record. CGI wasn't as good then as it is now, you can't really compare it.

[@mattmartindale4562]

So movies like T2 and Jurassic park were a fluke?

[@mwhitney85]

Matt Martindale those movies were largely practical effects over CGI. Yes some CGI was used but not as widely used through out the movie as you would think.

[@badassplayer1000]

Matt Martindale They were high budget movies compared to other ones at that time. Nowadays You can produce some good CGI with low budget.

[@AJTV01]

Dustin B At the same time, King Kong (the original) had pretty good CGI decades before any of these movies so there's no excuse for them to suck. Ex: Terminator was the late 80s so any movie from the 90s shouldn't look this shitty lol.

[@andrewj3976]

Nope. Jurassic Park? T2? Even The X Files had better effects a lot of times. A lot of this is just awful.

[@Jack-yr8vj]

If it's anything after 2005 you don't have an excuse for bad cgi

[@maxlarsson1152]

Chaos Burke Agree

[@BritishCommentWriter]

Chaos Burke Bullshit. Not only is convincing CGI almost impossibly hard, it ages ludicrously fast. All of the Slimer effects from the original Ghostbusters still hold up, and that film is more than thirty years old. I guarantee that if you watched Avatar or 10,000 BC again, you'll think its starting to look like a cartoon. Both Lord of The Rings, Jurassic Park and the 2005 King Kong remake are looking pretty flat these days as well. Because fundamentally CGI IS like trying to put a cartoon character into a real scene. I guarantee that ten years from now somebody will put another comment in youtube that says "If it's anything after 2015 you don't have an excuse for bad cgi".

[@Jack-yr8vj]

BritishCommentWriter bruh.

[@markusbisma5015]

Chaos Burke All CGI will looks bad eventually. In 2020 we will be laughing at CGI from 2005

[@theroyalseal2466]

BritishCommentWriter All those movies CGI is still pretty good. Its a lot better then most of the new stuff. Jurassic Park doesn't count because only 4 minutes of the movie had CGI in it.

[@captaink48000]

I think the Green Lantern one is very good

[@obedestrada6574]

Kevin Khoa me too

[@patricjoachimpino]

I agree

[@obedestrada6574]

@MKSEIHLELS yes

[@obedestrada6574]

Like the fight scene where green lantern fights parallax

[@obedestrada6574]

@MKSEIHLELS it really wasn't that bad

[@ThePacman2884]

Some of the old movies are pretty good for their time and technology its not fair to criticise them in 2019

[@Notaiidan]

Agreed

[@giaprincess5309]

Prakash Patel *this video was made in 2015*

[@WinterFlare]

*T h i s w a s m a d e 4 y e a r s* *a g o*

[@FarginBastiges]

Let's just collectively pretend the Star Wars Special Editions never happened, k?

[@TotallyNotAFox]

I'm proud that I only know the orginal versions through original VHS tapes XD

[@solarissamaris8971]

FarginBastiges What special editions, they never made any of those.

[@ooeygooeygoodra3068]

FarginBastiges you got it dude!

[@julesf.meloborges811]

Right, like the original Latex Jabba was any good... Maybe George should have waited a few more years before remastering.

[@ochinman6314]

The jaba the hut though i watched that yesterday and he was ugly

[@TheNinjaGumball]

The shotgun sound effect in Snake Attack is the same one as the shotgun from Halo.

[@WadsworthGaming]

+CheddarBacon Or Halo's shotgun sound effect is from... *SNAKE ATTACK.* Haha, just kidding, could you even imagine that? lol

[@TheNinjaGumball]

WadsworthGaming The best shotgun sound effect in a video game come from a shitty B-Movie? Get the f*** out DICE

[@WadsworthGaming]

Just to make sure, you clicked "show more," right..?CheddarBacon

[@TheNinjaGumball]

WadsworthGaming it didn't give me the option to

[@WadsworthGaming]

Ah, i said "Haha, just kidding, could you even imagine that? lol" at the end of that, 'twas meant to be a joke :p CheddarBacon

[@alannacammack2359]

Langoliers actually traumatized me. I watched it for the first time when i was maybe 13 years old and I still have unsettling thoughts about it. I will randomly be laying in bed and think about the film and get freaked out.

[@Daddy._Life]

Wow! No way! That strangely makes me happy to hear because I loved the novella growing up but thought the movie didn't do it a justice. Glad to see it atleast affected somebody lol (sorry you were traumatized though)

[@erickcruz3883]

Why no sharknado 😔 1 liek I preyer for sharknado budget (Spelt wrong on purpose)

[@sharpshootersosa0856]

Cuz sharknado is intentionally trash

[@erickcruz3883]

Sharpshootersosa08 Yo don’t speak on sharknado like that or we finna have beef 😔

[@sharpshootersosa0856]

Erick Cruz lol I luv sharknado I was joking XD watching mojo said that XD

[@sharpshootersosa0856]

0:45-0:48

[@aguyonyoutube4sure]

Listen to the beginning idiot

[@wolfsta90]

The opening scene for age of ultron was terrible

[@TheSupersaiyen2]

You sir are crazy

[@wolfsta90]

***** the movie was excellent, that scene..... Was not.

[@number10isawesome]

It wasn't terrible, but the CGI was very obvious.

[@polocharlie5449]

number10isawesome that what makes it terrible. Good CGI makes everything seem real bad CGI doesn't.

[@poisonousmaple7]

Julio Santiago Have to agree! The CGI in that opening scene was HORRIBLE! It looked like a cheaply made cartoon and nearly took me out of the movie. Good thing though the effects got much better throughout the film.

[@ronnielee3393]

I think Hulk and Green Lantern had pretty good effects in my opinion!

[@NormasWitnesses]

Many people would disagree.

[@thatonenicehusky3623]

True.

[@mamoaltun244]

Ronnie Lee yeah!

[@DarthVader-cl6vs]

Ronnie Lee You must be blind

[@Richard_Nickerson]

Hulk (for its time) did have pretty good effects. Green Lantern most certainly did not.

[@StoogesFan]

#1 should have been the entire movie, food fight.

[@lilskuzzy]

StoogesFan The melon ball that exists on the top layer of the world at all times. (watch the jontron version if you haven't already.)

[@mcrfan343]

Vegetales is a masterpiece. What planet are you from?

[@DorothyCarterArchive]

you've been watching jontron haven't you...

[@DorothyCarterArchive]

Lieutenant Nomad yeah

[@vuctz]

You missed one and I saw it when I first watched the movie: Guardians Of The Galaxy Mistake: There was a Flying Spaceship when Yondu was asked to arrest himself and the Ravagers. Yondu then proceeded to make a massacre with his “arrow”. The Spaceship can be seen crashing into the Xandarian field and, of course, there was an explosion. Conclusion: The explosion looked very cheap.