Antimatter Physics and Time-Travelling Particles

[@eyeswideshut7354]

TENET - Neil: "You mean reverse chronology. Like Feynman and Wheeler's notion that a positron is an electron moving backwards in time."

[@skywanker3073]

😁

[@genentropy]

I need to watch this movie. Also, let me know if you know of any fun masked parties happening this weekend.

[@cheapmovies25]

@@genentropy it's on hbo max

[@Unaomnia01]

Just watched Tenet free trial on Hulu... And palindromes are reflective symmetry and ambigrams are rotational symmetry... 1/2 spins make 720 degree rotations i.e. 2 x 360 i.e. anti matters opposite has palindromic spin sequence i.e. 1,2,3,2,1 but then somehow it's related to square roots which further relates to prime numbers and somehow I rope (pun intended) knot topology in because they have matrices as notation and prime knots 🤔 mind wanders but appearly knots are found in quantum eigenstates in re SV and s2 etc (mind wanders outside understanding)...

[@lingy96]

A very nice explanation on this matter.....

[@Rationalific]

It's a very nice explanation on this anti-matter as well.....

[@Noxious518]

thanks for making this video, it was so much easier to explain to my friend how time traveling works.

[@A.R.T.C.R.E.W]

just finished up reading Feynman's QED, this helped immensely in reinforcing certain concepts. hope you're still making stuff man, thanks for explaining

[@whateverrandomnumber]

Mind blown. Congratulations, excellent way to explain!!

[@StephenGillie]

Describing spin in this video finally made it click with me, after decades of study. This is why particles in cloud chamber plates curve so nicely. Electrons don't necessarily move in straight lines - they move like curve balls, as though they're spinning in a certain direction, curving against an invisible inherent angular momentum.

[@willsonbasyal7883]

Man, you go on making more videos... This one is just awesome!!!

[@dominicmalilay4293]

You explained this so well I thought Feynman was teaching!

[@tractorKing]

Subscribed for this. Thank you so much. Please make more!

[@alexbowman7582]

Using quantum entanglement advanced civilisations are communicating instantly. The benefit/disadvantage of this is that not only does the sender know the answer before the message has been sent but the receiver knows the question before the sender has even thought of it.

[@kostoglotov2000]

Hi Jonathan, you are a brilliant teacher like Feynman. You must do more videos and enlighten the world to the wonders of nature.

[@hunarahmad]

Great Explanation Jonathan! I wonder how would you revisit this video in the light your new physics project and the hypergraphs. Best

[@MajinGouki]

if you can travel time against clockwise , you got same background with two layers of matter they occupy spac/time of other matter , they can annihilate the matter that he occupied it's space/time , like you appear into someone's body like a ghost and become material ,you'll tear him appart ....also those 2layrs of matters becomes antimatter and their contact will make them explose and tranforms into energy

[@mehrdadmanzour3022]

Amazing explanations. Thank you so much for this..

[@dheerajpannem187]

Such a great explanation and video!!

[@TheoriesofEverything]

Curt here -- let's talk, Jonathan. The formalism of Wolfram's physics project is fascinating and I'll be speaking with Stephen directly for the podcast at the end of this month. Email me when you can (I believe you can search your email for my name).

[@TheLosrodri]

Really great video!! Do more please!

[@pianofortekang]

Love this explanation

[@KaliFissure]

Thank you! Excellent primer for these ideas! This I can teach NOW to most kids from grade 3 or 4 up.

[@trumanshow162]

If time is one of dimensions and antimatter is a material reversing time , it's rare because we are brown off to this time direction from the Big Bang , I think. The anti-particle we see may be a thing like whirl or reflection , made by some energy or invisible obstacle in other dimensions …… is that right ?

[@subhabratadas5153]

I want more videos like this.

[@theinquirer5740]

fantastic way of explaining

[@Yopi69]

Awesome! Waiting for your next video

[@jontology3173]

1a Thanks - the next one is in the works!

[@Self-Duality]

@@jontology3173 Still in the works, eh? 😉 We need more videos! 🤞

[@kegelboy]

oh dear god, this video cleared up SO many things for me!! Bravo!

[@BrettGarcia]

You have talent to teach Bro!!!

[@Loddfafnir100]

excellent video. Congratulations!!!!

[@WTAWWR08]

How does matter annihilate antimatter, if antimatter moves away from the point matter is heading towards?

[@eltyo340]

Make more! This was great!

[@johnjohnson5818]

Terrific video.

[@MichaelThomas-gx7jd]

check out; Advanced Linear Electron Beam Phased Propulsion.

[@ooker777]

are you going to create a new science channel? Cause I gonna subscribe it

[@jontology3173]

Ooker Hey! Yep, hopefully this will become a fairly regular science channel thing (with a particular emphasis on physics), assuming that this first test video takes off. A subscription would be very much appreciated!

[@ooker777]

Jontology there are many channels like yours. What would make yours be different?

[@jontology3173]

Excuse the lengthy post :P Okay, so when it comes to physics KZbin channels, it seems to me that they can be divided into two groups. Firstly, there are the more "popular science" types, which tend to get millions of views. They talk about ideas and concepts in physics, using analogies and illustrations to get people excited about physics without the need for advanced mathematics, which is a great way to reach out to the general public. Then, there are the more serious ones, which are more like mathematical lectures, in which the same ideas are rigorously defined and derived. They're longer, more boring (no one likes differential equations) and have a much higher barrier-to-entry. My goal is to do something in between: a physics series in which I talk about the *actual* physics behind these exciting ideas, even dropping in many of the mathematical ideas underpinning it (as I did in this video). It won't be super-dry with pages of equations and derivations, but it also won't be devoid of mathematical content, like most popular science books are. It will be real physics, but hopefully nonetheless approachable to the intelligent listener with a solid grasp of algebra and a rusty knowledge of calculus.

[@ooker777]

That's great. If you can make more videos, i'd like to donate you

[@heavyvideo445]

+Jontology I just found this video and the concept baffles me, even if I'm generally (no pun intended) familiar with relativity and other physics concepts. I'm definitely subscribing, since you do achieve this balance of specifics and interest.

[@kcalb456]

i still don't understand how changing the position of the space and time axis doesn't matter.What testable data suggest such things are ok to do(to get legit results) in the first place?

[@ZerofeverOfficial]

So, Double Slit Experiment, the particle does interact with itself, but the opposite one of itself traveling backwards into the past? Did i figure it out? Where's my Nobel?

[@AbuSayed-er9vs]

Where your video about space and time as you've mentioned here????

[@harikishore2514]

Why two electrons coming closer each other in space at first place, aren't they supposed to repel?

[@jimmesch]

He says that at 0:43

[@giorginoedery1636]

Is it possible that the virtual photon is what gives the 4d the capability to move between parallel dimensions of 3d, i.e. the virtual photon is the energy that moves the negative electron into a parallel dimension and is replaced by a positive electron of that same dimension. So that means the virtual photon is the power to move between dimensions of 3d, we cannot control this power because we are 3d lifeforms but i speculate this corroborates with that idea. This would make sense why the big bang did not make the same amount of antimatter, it did make it but it is an parallel universe we cannot see.

[@sprsae9003]

if very massive things like black holes can fast forward time for the ones orbiting it closely, i dont know how anti matter work, but the name of it makes me think its the exact opposit of matter, if you had a antimassive thing, a anti blackhole! could it work in the oppisit way with the time thing too? making time go in reverse when you're close to it!

[@sgtjonmcc]

A way you can visualize antimatter is changing the time function of normal matter essentially antimatter is time reversed matter at least that's how I heard it explained to me. But no, the inverse of a black hole; which are theorized to exist, are Whiteholes, but as of yet have not been seen.

[@sgtjonmcc]

The way black holes interact with SpaceTime is that they stretch they pull and pull SpaceTime down at faster than the speed of light a white hole would expand SpaceTime faster than the speed of light

[@PunmasterSTP]

Time-traveling? More like “My ignorance is unraveling!” Thanks for helping to educate us…

[@sgtjonmcc]

So question, can the gamma photon be used for energy or does the annihilation and coalescence of the gamma Photon back into and electron positron pair happen at the speed of light, or too fast to be useful for practical?

[@GEMSofGOD_com]

WHAT'S YOUR PROFILE PIC???????

[@tauhid9983]

Great video...Loved the explaination

[@dalegriffiths3628]

Cool ... but hang on if positron A is moving backward in time then when the electron A and positron A annihilates - producing the virtual photon - that then decays back into an electronB positronB pair, then the second positron formation occurs later in forward moving time than the first positron that annihilated with the initial electron. And also the concept of moving backwards in time seems screwed up because if we can think of time sat on the x-axis at the time of the big bang (time zero) normal matter moves forward in time and anti-matter moves backwards in time (negative time direction) wouldn't this mean that matter and anti-matter never meet?? If they are to meet then anti-matter must have been created in some not yet existent future and is moving backwards through time until it just happens upon our time and then that doesn't make sense with matter and anti-matter both being made at the time of the big bang.

[@subhabratadas5153]

Hay, why do you have only one video in your KZbin channel ?

[@aperipatetic2827]

Objective Completed! Abandon all of your fans and future fame! Good job!

[@PaleyDaley]

Great explanation, thanks. However, I have a question. When you first show the Feynman diagram, the virtual photon path is horizontal, meaning the photon exchange is completely instantaneous. Sure it's atomic scale, but it's still a finite distance, right? So are virtual particles not bound my the speed of light, or is it just a limit of the simplification of the explanation?

[@1cvl948]

Completely unrelated answer, but the photon in the second diagram remains in exactly the same point in space for quite a while which I believe is also impossible in quantum mechanics.

[@jatharva2000]

that is because you are seeing the Feynmann diagram from the point of view of the photon. It does not move through time for a photon everything is instantaneous and exists all at once. we see it moving through time from our point of view

[@No-oneInParticular]

Pretty great. But, does that mean positrons _only_ exist going backwards through time?

[@medexamtoolscom]

2:39 "Suppose now we played the video in reverse with the electron traveling backwards through time. Now, it will accelerate toward negative charge, away from positive charge..." WRONG! If you reverse the direction of time, the direction of acceleration remains the same. Consider this. You throw a ball into the air, and it reaches a peak and then lands on the ground. What is the direction of its acceleration? Downward, right? Now, play the video backwards. It jumps off the ground, reaches a peak, and lands in your hand. What direction is the acceleration? If you said upwards, you lose. It's still downwards. The direction of acceleration does not reverse when you play the video backwards. Now, if you played the video backwards, 2 electrons will still be repelling each other, but I SUPPOSE you could ARBITRARILY insist that they're repelling now because they're both positively charged and insist that in that direction of time, electrons are now attracted to negative charge, but that's an arbitrary definition of the polarity of charge. It's still repelled by other electrons even if you reverse the clock.

[@MilwaukeeAtheists]

dont matter and anti-matter have the same spin? that was my understanding

[@MilwaukeeAtheists]

Milwaukee Atheists nevermind, i answered my own question

[@jontology3173]

Milwaukee Atheists Don't worry - it's easy to get confused, since of course they both have the same spin magnitude. It's just opposite sign.

[@ibrahimr4690]

excellent

[@taigaboi]

If you can only go forward in time, how could you know that the particle time traveled? You would only know the particle time traveled if it waited for you on that specific present, which then i assume it also most have been traveled back in time to meet us there. Anyway im not really the sharpest knife in the drawer.

[@mn-ru4li]

Can you slow the speed down a bit. My brain was rattling

[@jojojorisjhjosef]

I strongly feel the notation for positrons as arrows backwards in time make no sense, this confusion is even more highlighted in your video by and having an arrow and having a positron symbol.

[@sofiaarnold1779]

Thank you!

[@davidwilkie9551]

Hello A rewording of this in terms of quantum phenomena, would start with the relative certainty-uncertainty of probability density, in the mathematics of historical possibility, ..contained by instantaneous superposition. Such that observed effects are fitted to this perceived reality. Ie the information presented represents an effect of mathematical relativity adjusting probability in possibility in quantized continuity. Cause-consequence is a fluid state in a single combined identity of time. It's the same picture on a more fundamental "ground-state", of time reversible causes. (Ie not right or wrong mathematically/constructively, just a different perception of time-phenomena fitted to the actuality of timespace) Also "past and future" are secondary effect terms, of integration and differentiation path-calculation, within net zero change of one probability, infinite eternity. It's a matter of perception, of cycles of cycles in a continuous spectrum of relative time rates and duration. The chemical properties of resonance are the physical identification of temporal superposition.

[@typingwithmyaxe4808]

this means the positron sees itself to be the electron, and it's the electron that is the positron for this [anti matter] electron this also means the positron, that is the electron in its own reality, experiences increasing entropy just like the electron experiences the increasing entropy for itself as well it's just the "mirroring" [could I call it chirality ?] that is responsible that each one sees the opposite for another one this is weird it's even weirder if you found out the chirality is everywhere around us it's like if the paralel realities was an actual thing meaning the universe, or how should I call it, is in some kind of super position and all possible scenarois ever are happening all at the very instant of time

[@ChasSimpson]

Great video but pity you didn't mention Dirac's role in the story and that he figured out that there was antimatter even before any physical evidence for it, a fairly smart chap 😊

[@florianreichelt]

cool! Keep up your good work :)

[@jacobvandijk6525]

Nice video, but a poor ending: 4:42. Feynman only explained things in different way! That was one of his talents. But pair-production, anti-matter, etc. were known well before Feynman started studying Physics.

[@aarthiv55]

Hi please help me i want to go back and change my past please help me 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😭😭😭😭

[@DCSTadi1337]

phenomenal

[@Unknown-sg4tv]

Tell government that because a person can change his or her mind from not using time machine to using time machine. Means scientific information on time travel should be illegal.

[@aperipatetic2827]

Alright, so you haven't posted for 4 years, I don't expect you to post anytime soon, I was about to Subscribe but ok

[@-_Nuke_-]

SO QUANTUM MECHANICS IS BASICALLY THE MOVIE TENET BUT FOR REAL WOW

[@surendrakverma555]

Good 🙂🙂🙂

[@vicentedealencar]

time travel? 4:49

[@mubeenmdmubeen5107]

Send to back in time information possible

[@astropredo]

10/10 BRO

[@justsaiyansteve]

Well that makes sense!

[@crissan5035]

i went into coma thinking about it was unpleasant to say the least my head hurts.

[@time-mechanics]

Hi Dude, cool work. I have done most of what you chaps - will be- trying! to do. Ignorance isn’t bliss? If you don’t agree lol no worries enjoy your world line. Welcome to mine 🖖❤️ have a lovely day.

[@agf7destined424]

👍

[@nilskeppel]

why can't I just watch tenet the way everybody else does

[@Self-Duality]

👏😌💭

[@MrJdcirbo]

Electrons can have both spins. The Paulie Exclusionary Principle states that electrons cannot exist in the same quantum state, yet we find two electrons in the same orbital. That's because I've electron has spin up and the other spin down (or one is spinning clockwise and the other counterclockwise). They are both regular matter. Here's a great pbs video explaining it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/norOkpSer6uKnNE

[@jontology3173]

I’m afraid you’re confusing the intrinsic angular momentum of the particle (which is what I’m referring to in this video) with the discrete spectrum of the angular momentum operator (which is what the Pauli exclusion principle refers to). Electrons cannot have “both spins”, but they can be observed to have one of two spin components in any chosen direction.

[@jontology3173]

WhoistheJC? The point that I was making in this video was simply that, in a positron, the angular momentum and magnetic moment are always parallel, whereas in an electron they are always antiparallel. The distinction between angular momentum and the spectrum of its associated operator is made totally explicit by the Hilbert space formalism of QM, but I suspect that it’s somewhat harder to communicate within a PBS video.

[@MrJdcirbo]

@@jontology3173 Fair enough. My understanding of the math of QM is rough at best. That said, I have one question for you: are you stating that antimatter is actually moving backwards in time or that it is mathematically equivalent to a time reversed, mirror image of its corresponding particle under CPT symmetry?

[@subhabratadas5153]

Grate

[@alexander7890]

Here after watching Tenet

[@algieabrams2278]

Thanks for this, my only suggetion is to speak slower and more clearly. That Brit accent is sometime hard for Americans to understand when spoken fast.

[@powahwave8915]

Anti matter is energy from the Creator and purifies us of the negative energy and takes us to heaven

[@Unaomnia01]

Funny but I cant tell if I should take it seriously lol

[@massimilianocacciamani7736]

Ghaagh this is the second video that I understand that says that antimatter travels back in time...

[@daemonnice]

Predicting new laws of physics and verifying them are two different things. But this sure makes for good sci-fi fodder.

[@robhobbo8669]

I guess making something out of antimatter would be tricky. You'd start off with the fully formed object and then deconstruct it.

[@rigobertovillalobos3614]

3:40 ...im dead af

[@Fif0l]

My head hurts. I think I'll go visit dr. Resnick for some remedy.

[@fire2fireable]

Wow tell me this: I predicted time travel through anti matter physics and then watched this video I never thought existed until I found out they found the antimatter light spectrum and then looked up the video for anti matter time dynamics because if light is found existence is found then time is found. What if all frames of reality are antimatter being destroyed as the future catches up with the past. Everything is a duality therefore existence and nonexistence is always challenged by the biggest and slowest force there is: Decay and the ability to remorse it. Is death really the future? Death is something we fear and fear is what we do not know.I believe we fill the void with shit and stuff to put on your doppelganger: who you look at in the mirror. Mirrors are very important on what we look at as real. Or is everything we make up (i).(e). (i)maginary or r(e)al? Well our government would like you to know that all pleasure is something we need. Make yourself pleasured by what we want. Is a world filled with pleasure and reality really a good thing? or does it just make you a dumb idiot who doesnt strive to find the truth? FIND THE TRUTH! THE TRUTH OF LIFE OR DEATH! the truth of love and reality. Time is what we make it and gravity well our gravity would say so. Every time the future and past confront one another it is turned into the present i.e the past before the future. Hell I'd say that in itself is a paradox. The paradox of time. tick tock tick tock. Hell the cigarette companies even have a domain name of truth i.e. .com I do not know if people have a copyright attachment to the word truth but if there is money behind everything it is sealed with lies and conspiracy for power. People want power and exact power of will. People who are selfish are the people who rule our societies. Truth is the way. Truth is we are all but waves in an ocean of fear. Some people can't float because all is left but fear in a society where people only care if you have a good rating. Technology only teaches the ignorant that everyone is good only if they have rating. If you are good enough to be heard then you should use your voice to make others hear what is really real. Not just shit literal shit we eat everyday. Peace friends

[@haughtywillow2499]

Interesting idea.

[@temperuncentered1753]

anyone here after tenet?

[@jfish1298]

TENET

[@wesbaumguardner8829]

E=mc^2 is not Einstein's equation, you dunce. It is Woldemar Voigt's equation from his Doppler Paper published in 1876. Einstein was a prolific plagiarist. But he completely misused the equation in his completely nonsensical theory.

[@ghostagent3552]

This is literally my boogey man

[@alphalunamare]

Isn't this just a glorified 'what if this is true' story? based on turning pieces of paper with diagrams around on a table? Heisenberg and Einstein explain virtual particles, they Hyneman stuff is just unnecessary, well at least not necessary.

[@wesbaumguardner8829]

You are wrong. Bullsh!t multiplied by more bullsh!t equals bullsh!t squared, not the annihilation of bullsh!t!

[@marcelmolenaar5684]

Do not believe this!