Didn't really explain the differences between the two or gave any examples for which is better on certain aspects. The title of the video wasn't delivered
@shravanuchil Жыл бұрын
Yes there so many more things could have covered up in this
@AlMaVizca Жыл бұрын
Look at the c10k problem, analysis remains the same as far as I know
@zacktaylor1143 Жыл бұрын
Lmao, wtf, did you only watch the first 5 minutes? He breaks it down at the end.
@ugwulo3 ай бұрын
Did you really watch this to the end?
@leonprofes85443 ай бұрын
I just watched til the end based on you two donuts only to realize I sam being scammed. This video doesn't break up anything. MY mom knows things said in this video. What a bummer. The narrator is cool but the content is for simpletons.
@im-a-trailblazer Жыл бұрын
This man has talent, and he is able to explain it in a very enjoyable way, and he can write backwards very fast. I need to up my game man...
@commandstring Жыл бұрын
Yes this threw me off cause I realized he was writing backwards
@ordinary_flo Жыл бұрын
Hahaha, I bet he isn't a leftie writing backwards. They just flipped the image in post. That's why there is no text or IBM logo on his clothes, because that would be backwards then. 😉
@Lalee107 ай бұрын
They mirror the video after writing normally, that makes it look like they are writing backwards
@kavyeshs41 Жыл бұрын
we can install Apache's modules separately. but nginx needs a re-compilation of binary if want to enable a new module. and another main difference is Nginx is event driven while apache is process driven. which means nginx can handle much more request on single thread but apache create new thread for every request. which makes nginx fast/more performant
@braunbaerhh Жыл бұрын
Apache has an event MPM for years.
@francisantony12 Жыл бұрын
@@braunbaerhh I think MPM is not the same as being Event Driven - In and ED model ( "reactive" ), there is no thread at all unless some activity is in progress. Ex:- A thread needs to make a backend call. Immediately after making the backend call ( using poll() system call ), the thread will switch to doing other unrelated tasks *instead of* being blocked. Whereas in MPM, thread will become free - but task is handed over to other threads.... This is my understanding. Somebody please comment/correct if Im wrong
@kif11 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this valuable clarification!
@Rusputin-eo6tv Жыл бұрын
thanks you, that's sound crucial for interview
@EdwinMartin5 ай бұрын
@@francisantony12indeed, mpm is not an event module. Apache does have an *event* module which uses threads instead of processes, similar to NGINX
@gosnooky Жыл бұрын
It should also be noted that Apache uses a multi-threaded architecture with each request running in its own thread, while NGINX uses a single-threaded architecture with an event loop. Because of this, NGINX can handle many more simultaneous requests and is what gives it its speed advantage. In programmer terms, Apache acts like Java, NGINX acts like NodeJS.
@braunbaerhh Жыл бұрын
Apache has an event MPM for years.
@stackerliew Жыл бұрын
Apache is far more stable than nginx.
@danilodistefanis5990 Жыл бұрын
@@braunbaerhhstill is not truly event driven.
@EdwinMartin5 ай бұрын
@@danilodistefanis5990Apache uses epoll. How is that not event driven?
@kamarton Жыл бұрын
I've been using both for many years, and I like the modules and configuration of nginx much better.
@khasanbekdev Жыл бұрын
Great, I always enjoyed videos of IBM Tech, can you make a video explanation for ASGI and WSGI servers.
@ta_pegandofogoАй бұрын
Great explanation, well-spoken (I liked the subtle jokes) and great coverage of the topic. Great video at all.
@andygordon6880 Жыл бұрын
Fanatistic quick explanation of different considerations when looking at web server performance. Great start to answering the question. Thank you
@jonniuss11 ай бұрын
Amazing, always love your way to uncover technological nuances ❤
@chwaee Жыл бұрын
TLDR/TLDW: Apache is older but more mature (extensions) while nginx is newer and faster. Both can be used rather interchangeably though.
@unspoken2409 Жыл бұрын
I have been looking for a video like this for a long time! Outstanding work!
@chalingui Жыл бұрын
OMG Martin is the man. One day making exBEERiments and the other day teaching about web servers
@brunogoismateus5 ай бұрын
Ohhh. That's why I recognized that face. Lol.
@samjones4327 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this lesson! You’ve unlocked a bit of a mystery for me as I’m beginning my cloud journey! 🥳
@snowywinter9 Жыл бұрын
Such a pleasant and knowledgeable presenter. Fantastic delivery.
@taskforce_kerim Жыл бұрын
These IBM videos are hella good!
@cguevaraaguilar6 ай бұрын
Thank you very very much! Finally I understood it in a simple, clear and practical way. I'm your fan!
@AppaloosaMichael Жыл бұрын
Thank you, british man & ibm. Perfect explanation 🙏
@pieter5466 Жыл бұрын
4:48 The difference between Apache and Nginx
@starterdev Жыл бұрын
This is the reason why I love ibm ♥️
@entalpa Жыл бұрын
You didn't mention that Nginx can do Rate Limiting, WAF and more...Nginx can be a lot of faster by tweaking the settings for your use case.
@muhdbunahmad Жыл бұрын
You cannot explain or mention everything in a seven minute video.
@andarin2 Жыл бұрын
@@muhdbunahmad Our fella here did it in less than a line
@alehkhantsevich113 Жыл бұрын
@@muhdbunahmad Video lasts 7 min, but actually there is 4 words..... First/Extensible and Fast/Simple. I believe 7min video can serve much more info about Apache vs Nginx like title says.
@andrewlalis Жыл бұрын
@@andarin2 they just named things, and didn't explain anything
@crisanerd Жыл бұрын
@@alehkhantsevich113 This is like Tik Tok’s fast paced info vs KZbin’s in-depth content
@marcoswelker132 Жыл бұрын
Love the drawings. Helps a lot
@purposepowerlove Жыл бұрын
And then there is haproxy, which blows them away in terms of speed and resource usage. Plus it has many more modern features included by default.
@hamu_sando Жыл бұрын
HAproxy is the default router (ALB) for the OpenShift platform.
@rossbrook9182 Жыл бұрын
this guy is great, very good video
@gregliming6875 Жыл бұрын
Hey look, It's the Homebrew Challenge guy.
@KoliaSelivanov5 ай бұрын
Awesome tutorial, thanks a lot! ☺️
@arieheinrich3457 Жыл бұрын
Martin is a rockstar !
@BobDschingisKhan Жыл бұрын
Did you really write from right to the left on that screen that we can read it or what is the magic behind this cool presentation technique? Thanks for the Video and BR
@valen8560 Жыл бұрын
omg
@mohammadalaaelghamry8010 Жыл бұрын
Great resource of knowledge, high quality, very concise and to the point. I so much appreciate it. Thanks.
@severtone26311 ай бұрын
Excellent explanation. Thank you
@tnmyd5 ай бұрын
Wait a minute! That's Martin from brulosophy! That's so cool
@ermvcorleone30695 ай бұрын
So you mentioned I can use Nginx as a load lanancer infront of multiple Apache web servers. How would I go about setting up multiple Apache servers to serve the same one static site?
@ערןאוצפ Жыл бұрын
Regarding the load balancing features, how does how would we sockets be handled as apposed to regular http requests which are simply routed the web servers need to hold open connections
@mohammadhussain9068 Жыл бұрын
Great explanation
@Adil-dp4ll Жыл бұрын
I always wondered how do they make such videos as facing the camera and writing on some board right front of us. Then i noticed an odd thing. All these people in such videos were lefty. It means they were writing on a transparent board facing them and once after they were done, the video was mirrored using video editor software.
@StevenWDix6 ай бұрын
The biggest difference I believe is .htaccess in Apache which gives granual control over user experience and security. If ASP had figured that out, they would not have been always playing catch up, however like most things popular, people start adding too many modules that slow everything down and you likely want to compile very carefully a stripped down version of Apache to use it, which is not advocated greatly. Nginx is perhaps geared towards being fast, secure, and the big companies have the money to partition off special purpose servers instead of relying on .htaccess, which is not a horrible strategy either. With the latest generations by AMD and Intel chips, you will only see the differences by testing in nano seconds, if you work for big data you have to learn these things.
@dariokartal9453 Жыл бұрын
Wait. So, the connection from my computer to the actual server is covered by the TLS certificate NOT NECESSARILY all the way? And that shouldn't raise anybody's alarm?
@davak7211 ай бұрын
Yes and no. It depends. Without a proxy, the final server decrypts your traffic anyway, so if the proxy and the final server are on the same private network, and it’s secure, that should be fine. In the other hand, if you use Cloudflare tunnels, they get to decrypt the traffic, look at it, then re-encrypt and send it to the actual server
@shivamanand89985 ай бұрын
favourite website IBM 😂 Lol I'm laughing so hard you make me cry laughter 😂
@portfedh4 ай бұрын
Great explanation, than you
@AniketSomwanshi-ll7mz Жыл бұрын
So confused. So neither of these servers are for dynamic pages? Tomcat server is used for Java applications but what about non-java applications? Which server is used?
@tunisoft7465 Жыл бұрын
wow that glass is so clean
@davejones542 Жыл бұрын
great video. btw @1:29 I always thought "a couple" meant two did I miss the memo
@MartinKeen Жыл бұрын
LOL
@जयमहाराष्ट्र24Ай бұрын
Great content to clear the mental model. However, also please point to resources needed for deep dive, and make architectural decisions.
@richardguernsey908 Жыл бұрын
Beer brewing and Software Architecture? Noice!
@NachtmahrNebenan Жыл бұрын
The drawing of the browser window looks the same as my Mesa Boogie guitar amp 😅
@StompboxBreakdown Жыл бұрын
For when you're a Full Stack engineer
@larrywest42 Жыл бұрын
I do wish people would stop saying "SSL" when they mean "TLS". Virtually no one uses SSL any longer. Browsers disabled or removed it years ago, and I'd be very surprised if any of IBM's web sites still support it.
@EdwinMartin5 ай бұрын
TLS is just SSL with a higher version number 😉
@brownianmotion6319 Жыл бұрын
Love the presentation. Is that perspex or glass? What pens is he using anyone?
@Hiram8866 Жыл бұрын
A very interesting video. Cheers
@amirmirou Жыл бұрын
My question is: how did you do this "writing on glass effect" it blows my mind you are facing the camera, are you writing backword or what?
@GravitoRaize Жыл бұрын
nginx Plus also does TCP and even UDP load balancing out of the box. I guess I've only ever used nginx Plus cause it does basically anything I want to do and has all the health checking and other stuff built in. If the backend runs Apache or Tomcat, then that's fine, but for load balancing I'm not sure why you'd use Apache unless you wanted complex solution to what should be a simple problem. Sure, nginx Plus costs money, but if you want a load balancing solution that doesn't, learn HAProxy, don't spend time learning Apache unless you have to.
@kirillzlobin71357 ай бұрын
DNS, MAIL, TCP and UDP?? Are these four should stay in one sentence. Aren't they from different categories?? DNS can use TCP and UDP... So this statement as in this video is definitely confusing making people think that these protocols are on the same level
@pankaj16octdogra Жыл бұрын
Nice presentation, pls make video of cloud native app architecture with financial services application
@kahchon875 ай бұрын
Can do one video that talks about litespeed server?
@MrRades123 Жыл бұрын
Does anyone know what these boards are called he is writing on and how this is recorded so the camera can not be seen?
@basix250 Жыл бұрын
Start from 4:50.
@moatazfarid2920 Жыл бұрын
Very Nice presentation, keep it up
@dmytroparfeniuk2670 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video! Just out of curious, why did you put the EXTENSIBLE parameter only to the Apache http server instead of both? Isn't NginX provide it?
@docteurklein Жыл бұрын
yes nginx totally is extensible as well. one could even argue it is more extensible, given the ecosystem of nginx modules out there. But the IBM host has a bad habit of just cherry-picking some random attributes of the products under comparison and put it either left or right, wich I would define as a *bad* "versus" video. It's the second video I watch from this guy, and the second time I'm disappointed. Happy to see the encouraging comments above, which proves it seems helpful for beginners tho.
@coll1208 Жыл бұрын
Why is my YT beer-brewer talking about servers?!
@Abhi-qi6wm Жыл бұрын
Any views on Apache APISIX vs Nginx?
@vimalbharath45555 ай бұрын
How he is writing on the display
@lucasgandara4175 Жыл бұрын
Does anyone knows how to make a video like this? with this "invisible blackboard" ?
@IBMTechnology Жыл бұрын
Search on "lightboard videos"
@lucasgandara4175 Жыл бұрын
@@IBMTechnology Thanks!
@IBMTechnology Жыл бұрын
See ibm.biz/write-backwards for a video explaining it
@chadzulu4328 Жыл бұрын
This explanation helped me a whole lot! Thanks so much.
@JonnyMainframe Жыл бұрын
How about the difference (if any) between Apache and IBM HTTP Server?
@nealpan Жыл бұрын
Azure Application Gateway is great option!
@wadecodez Жыл бұрын
can't wrap my head around how they filmed this. did the guy write backwards or was it filmed in a mirror I have to know
@micoberss5579 Жыл бұрын
Mirrored the recorded video. I couldn't figure it out, I was thinking that's some kind of IBM technology. But somebody in comments said that they must have mirrored the video
@gorlanich Жыл бұрын
I thought you are going to brew with ibm.
@ChanceTEK Жыл бұрын
Extremely helpful... Thank you.
@HahaHihi11111 Жыл бұрын
Why present old technologies? LiteSpeed is where?
@sabuein5 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@enjoyajeet Жыл бұрын
What are the servers used behind the load balancer?
@SteveGillham Жыл бұрын
Web Servers
@g30rgyth3d4rk Жыл бұрын
Probably microservices under k8 instances, docker instances etc
@joemarji7245 Жыл бұрын
Timestamps for the mash out plz
@thatomotaung6891 Жыл бұрын
I need this board expeditiously
@sabart5 Жыл бұрын
So the only difference is that Nginx is faster? I was expecting a more elaborated explanation.
@braunbaerhh Жыл бұрын
it is not faster. You can configure a Apache so it is as fast as Nginx.
@kompila Жыл бұрын
@@braunbaerhh Looks like it all about configurations 😃
@MaxZRider Жыл бұрын
whole video summarized: apache = older, enterprise extensible || nginx = newer, fast simple
@md9936 Жыл бұрын
Good video, I'd like to learn about WAS or Webspherem, pls!
@opensourcefreedom9241 Жыл бұрын
having an arrow with Apache is kind of spot on with the Native American community :P I am Cherokee so I get it and think it is funny.
@fkangalov Жыл бұрын
is he writing on that thing backwards ?
@IBMTechnology Жыл бұрын
See ibm.biz/write-backwards
@fkangalov Жыл бұрын
@@IBMTechnology makes more sense :). Love the videos though.
@suryapratap3043 Жыл бұрын
I don't know what goes on under the hood of apache or nginx, but having used apache for year and nginx now I can say nginx is a lot simpler and hell lot faster. If you're developing new solution in 2023, go with nginx without second thought. Apache will be legacy soon.
@javjaveds7547 Жыл бұрын
Layer 7 not 7 layer!
@thesoppywanker5 ай бұрын
This entire video was made to deliver that bean dip joke.
@shanejohnson4546 Жыл бұрын
You ended there?.... I'm lost for words
@sunduchkov Жыл бұрын
So, what, where is a comparison?
@vbounyar Жыл бұрын
Good info but also I am awe the presenter writing backwards!
@zgeorgem11 ай бұрын
layer 7. not 7 layer.
@EngineerNick Жыл бұрын
I have worked with both and they both suck. Very good at the basics, but so hard to make them do anything complicated. It takes like 2 lines of rust code to enable cors... But try add cors at the reverse proxy level instead and get ready for hours of agony reading poor documentation.
@andyhall7032 Жыл бұрын
wait...people still use apache ??
@tss4629 Жыл бұрын
There are few more webservers out there - WAS (Websphere Application server), Tomcat, Apache, Nginx,and I think JBoss also. Choose what you like. 😂
@kebman Жыл бұрын
Not a contest. NGINX all the way. Unless you _have_ to run some cruddy PHP or Java thingy.
@12345abcd_qwerty Жыл бұрын
thanks
@LewisCowles Жыл бұрын
Layer 7 not 7 layer. Other than that, good video. Didn't know IBM made these. Optional SSL... 🤐 (in the cluster only right?)
@2371996npistiolas Жыл бұрын
You are either a lefty able to write backwards or you reversed the video image
@infertilepiggy56674 ай бұрын
that backwards writing though
@bitground1776 Жыл бұрын
The presentation doesn't bring more on the difference between the two, you should change the title.
@ทองดีจันทร์ทรัพย์4 ай бұрын
Суперская связка, такие редко попадаются в открытом доступе, в основном в приватках и могут подкинуть прям друзья!
@willemvdk4886 Жыл бұрын
Aren't we brewing today?
@IvaneMkadegebeli Жыл бұрын
How does the guy write in reverse…
@IBMTechnology Жыл бұрын
See ibm.biz/write-backwards
@IvaneMkadegebeli Жыл бұрын
@@IBMTechnology :DD thx
@mikemx55 Жыл бұрын
wow, you explained nothing about their differences and just went on rambling about what an http server is and reverse proxys and load balancers... none of which are the primary purpose of apache or nginx
@joachimdietl6737 Жыл бұрын
the speed of information flow is negative in these series
@jackwt7340 Жыл бұрын
International Business Machines Corporation🎰
@tyrojames9937 Жыл бұрын
CHECK❗
@ethernet764 Жыл бұрын
Layer 4? Layer 7? The OSI model is obsolete. > I have said before that I believe that teaching modern students the OSI model as an approach to networking is a fundamental mistake that makes the concepts less clear rather than more. The major reason for this is simple: the OSI model was prescriptive of a specific network stack designed alongside it, and that network stack is not the one we use today. In fact, the TCP/IP stack we use today was intentionally designed differently from the OSI model for practical reasons. - j. b. crawford