Appointment of Judges in India|| Collegium System|| NJAC case|| 99 Amendment|| All Cases

[@shovitsingh5938]

Perfect explanation 😊 However , Under the MoP, recommendations for judicial appointments to high courts are first sent to the central government by individual high court collegiums for Intelligence Bureau (IB) inputs. The government then forwards the files, along with the IB inputs, to the Supreme Court collegium. If the apex court collegium clears the names, the files return to the central government that then either notifies the appointments or sends them back with objections or its views. At this stage, the apex court collegium can seek additional inputs on the government’s opinion. Accordingly, it can either reject or reiterate the proposal. If the collegium reiterates its decision, brushing aside government objections, then, under the MoP, the government is bound to notify the appointments. However, under the MoP does not specify a timeframe for the central government to act on a collegium decision.

[@legalblueprint4526]

thankyou so much for your insights.

[@pranjalbondre8024]

great video! I like how simply and briefly all the topics have been explained.

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thank you so much

[@kanubhaisuthar4574]

Nicely and deeply explained from root in a simple manner

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thankyou so much 😊

[@akshaypandit8812]

Wonderfully explained in simple way. Thank u Regards Akshay Pathak

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thanks a lot Akshay

[@sureshs4903]

The notes that you have made is so short and crisp.. I loved the way you explained.. If you are continuing in making KZbin videos, please start the playlist on Articles 1 - 395 Till now no KZbin channel has made this... Constitution bareacts are hard to understand than any other bareacts I guess..

[@LOFI.MUSICS.99]

You are awesome... you clear my concept... thenkewww sister 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘

[@legalblueprint4526]

You’re welcome

[@appy4416]

Ur Way of explanation is superb ma'am 🙏

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thankyou so much

[@charanbusi7516]

Short and very informative

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thankyou

[@shaonlyghosh767]

It's very elaborately explain ❤️

[@Shubham8839]

Nahi degi

[@anandarya1334]

5:59...collegium system through second judges se aaya naa ki 3rd judges..2nd judges-1993.

[@sayantannath7655]

Shruti ji, Namaste... I have a question: why no such public activity or strong protest had been taken place in last five years trying to reinstate the NJAC Act again instead of some talks only...!!

[@usha7391]

Superb explanation mam👌

[@legalblueprint4526]

Glad you liked it

[@sonalnain6668]

Keep it up .... well done

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thanks 😊👍

[@lingarajkashyap9681]

NEEDS CHANGES IN COLLEGIUM SYSTEM AS RESPECTS APPOINTMENT POSTING AND PROMOTION OF JUDGES AND CHIEF JUSTICE'S OF UNION JUDICIARY BY INTRODUCTION AND CREATION OF INDIAN JUDICIAL SERVICE IN COUNCILS OF STATES IN PARLIAMENT AS PRESCRIBED UNDER CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

[@utkarshvyas8355]

I am sorry but you are really missing out on the years like at 4:49 the correct year is 1998, not 1993 (as mentioned by you), and at 1:47, JS. Beg was appointed as CJI in 1977 although it was decided in 1976, the year 1977 should be followed rather than 1976. Overall very well explained short and precise, you hit the bull's eye. All the Best

[@legalblueprint4526]

Noted. We will be more careful with our content from the next time. Do share the video with your friends.

[@aasthathakur1377]

Getting better at it!!!❤️❤️❤️ Will take my notes from here only now. Great great work Shru🙌🏻

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thanks thakur

[@sanskritibballb2386]

Not 1958 its 1956 when the Law Commission headed by the Attorney General M.C Setalved Disfavoured this practice.

[@geetverma7752]

Keep growing..... 👌I like 👍🏻 it

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thankyou

[@ashwinisingh5581]

NJACis also not good.see,appointmentof govt advocate in district courtand high court by Govt in arbitraryway.Written exam is fair process byproviding opportunity to every counsel

[@legaltimes9919]

Very nicely explained

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thanks for liking

[@rishipandit5344]

Nice...

[@gayatri3889]

Thankyou ma'am.. plz make more vedio about constitution.. I'm a law student and your vedio is very helpful for me

[@legalblueprint4526]

thankyou so much Meera. Soon new content will be uploaded. Keep sharing and supporting.

[@jyotirmayeedevi7198]

Very very impressive and well expressed

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thanks jyoti

[@ArvindSingh-hh4fr]

A good Informative video

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thankyou

[@gopaljisingh8635]

Either you are ignorant or partitsan in favour of judges. Issue of making CJI concurrence a must in appointment was proposed, discussed and rejected by the the constitution drafting committee. Dr Ambedkar, in his concluding remark on this issue, categorilly stated that he can't provide veto right to CJI. In his opinion, it will be dangerous. So, judges interpretation that consultation means concurrence is malfide, intentional and selfish Please refer Vol.VIII of the debates. You will do a great service to Indian citizens if you bring that aspect to public knowledge.

[@Mohit-ke6qk]

Owsm sister

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thanks 😊

[@amandeep0679]

Thank you Mam💐

[@legalblueprint4526]

We are glad that it was helpful :) Do visit our channel for more such content

[@revathymohandas1872]

Thanks alot

[@legalblueprint4526]

Happy to help!

[@shaluarora5720]

Great work👍

[@suhailkhan6919]

Thnx

[@pradipawachar1839]

very well explained

[@legalblueprint4526]

thankyou so much

[@samritinain510]

Woww amazing ❣️❣️

[@anweshaghosh402]

Great video 👍

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thankyou

[@kishank7113]

Well explained

[@sonalisingh2062]

Well explained!

[@user-dostiBaniRaheBus]

2:44 1933?us waqt to GoI Act 1935 b ni aya tha

[@soniasehrawat2422]

Thankuh mam

[@legalblueprint4526]

You're most welcome ;)

[@LOFI.MUSICS.99]

Just subscribed ❤️👍🙏

[@legalblueprint4526]

Welcome aboard! :)

[@mohanladwal6643]

NJAC is must now

[@rehantiktok5569]

Good

[@legalblueprint4526]

Thanks

[@tarunaarora6205]

👌👌

[@kaulkaul8898]

so basically, judges can appoint other judges without any input from the government ... this is absurd. they cannot and should not have this absolute power

[@anowarhussain2242]

So ,if politicians get this power , won't they misuse it????

[@kaulkaul8898]

@@anowarhussain2242 the politicians are elected by the people. so they at least have some accountability. also, it should be like US system... once a SC judge gets appointed by the parliament, he or ahe cannot be removed... that will ensure their independence. it is still better than judges just appointing other judges... there is absolutely no checks and balance in place. they have no accountability to anyone... plus a risk of getting influenced by foreign powers... there are a lot problems with this system

[@Saianshexamguide]

How chief judge of high court be appointed??

[@legalblueprint4526]

In case of initial appointment of a Chief Justice of a High Court, the provisions of Article 217 will have to be followed. Initiation of the proposal for the appointment of Chief Justice of a High Court would be by the Chief Justice of India. The Chief Justice of India would send his recommendation for the appointment of a puisne Judge of the High Court as Chief Justice of that High Court or of another High Court, in consultation with the two senior most Judges of the Supreme Court. The Chief Justice of India will send his proposal, to the Union Minister of Law, Justice and Company Affairs. After receipt of the recommendation of the Chief Justice of India, the Union Minister of Law, Justice and Company Affairs would obtain the views of the concerned State Government. After receipt of the views of the State Government, the Union Minister of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, will submit proposals to the Prime Minister, who will then advise the President as to the selection. As soon as the appointment is approved by the President, the Department of Justice will announce the appointment and issue necessary notification in the Gazette of India.

[@ramandeepsingh7054]

Third case 1998 me tha

[@ramandeepsingh7054]

Sari dates aap galat bta rye o