This video looks at the equilibrium constant, Kc. Here are the notes from the video: drive.google.com/file/d/0B099ziyBlLO_LVctbEQzX0pmSVU/view?usp=sharing
Пікірлер: 197
@nuharahman60777 ай бұрын
7 years later and it is still great help! thank you!
@Exists27015 күн бұрын
its literally timless
@paigebrown47275 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much honestly you're saving my chemistry A-level. You've inspired me so much to even start my own channel on biology A-level for AQA.
@AzraKahraman2 жыл бұрын
just subscribed
@FerventRebutter8 жыл бұрын
Excellent lesson. Studying chemistry for one year on an Access course, and once again Mr Rintoul's channel has been outstanding. I hope I can find use in this channel once I'm at Uni! Thanks again!
@ryanagar11147 жыл бұрын
I'm on access too :D
@FerventRebutter7 жыл бұрын
Awesome man, I finished mine last September and I'm currently studying at De Montort Uni - best of luck pal, hope you get to where you want to go :)
@ryanagar11147 жыл бұрын
Joshua Macleod what did you end up studying? I'm worried we haven't covered enough content for uni (doing biochem)
@FerventRebutter7 жыл бұрын
I'm studying biomedical science, really similar to biochemistry. I know the modules can be different, so I'll break down what I covered on Access: - Physics (pass/fail) and Advanced Physics (graded) - Environmental Science (graded, I think?) and Ecology (graded) - Foundation chemistry (graded) and redox, equilibria and energetics (graded) - Loads of graded biology content, but cannot for the life of me remember the unit names haha. - Maths (ungraded) and study skills (ungraded) If you've covered anything around these, I'm sure they'll be of ample information. It also depends on what you're issue is concerning; the likelihood of being accepted or how you'll find the content; - De Montfort accepted me with just passes; though I got 45/45 distinctions (I had low expectations :P) - they even offered me a £1000 scholarship for enrolling with an Access qualification. So universities are keen on giving you a chance :) - In regards to what foundational knowledge you will need is anyones guess, but you will often find the universities will go right back to basics to ensure you're ready to grasp the better stuff. (We were literally taught that the mitochondria was the power house of the cell). Don't fret too hard, and remember that there will be handfuls of other people with Btecs, Access and other non-A-level qualifications in the same boat as you. If you're worried about whether you are capable, please take heed - I left A-levels with E's in everything (that I didn't get U's in) and have managed to attain Firsts in EVERYTHING thus far at Uni. I hope you do really well, and please ask any more questions. :)
@ryanagar11147 жыл бұрын
Joshua Macleod thanks man, motivating words. I'm heading towards my last exams and ontrack for 45/45. I'll have to look into the scholarship at Nottingham. How did you go about getting that? was it the same route as scholarships for AAA students. My plan is to read over A2 topics and bring up my maths over summer.
@user-yf6ki8ce5t8 жыл бұрын
When chemistry gets too much............. 7:29
@jemmachoudhury94527 жыл бұрын
Is it possible that you would ever consider doing AQA A Level Biology videos? Love your videos by the way, great help!
@__III__3 жыл бұрын
@Emerson Lennox shush u bot
@raza786952 жыл бұрын
I think chemistry is his specialty that's why he hasn't made any
@ojassomethin2 жыл бұрын
@@raza78695 Yeah duh
@danzyt26212 жыл бұрын
Innit stfu biology is for obese people
@kalashnikid478 жыл бұрын
My G 8) Thanks for the great video, hope to do well on my mocks :D
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+MAR Fingers crossed!
@mali-hz4cb8 жыл бұрын
Great video! Glad your still doing videos for old spec A2! Thanks! Btw how many videos do have left to do for unit 5 or is that completed?
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+mali 45671 There's a few more yet.
@dennisgjoka107 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, your videos are extremely helpful! No wonder you barely get dislikes
@sherrypahilanga21724 жыл бұрын
hi, if anyone can reply..why did you get methanol as 0.07mol when it states that 0.17mol was found in equilibrium mixture.. i want to know why he had to do 0.24-0.17 process... and also i want to know what is 0.24mol, 0.17mol, 0.07 mol separately to clarify my doubt... :(
@andrejameske7556 Жыл бұрын
omg this is exactly what i dont understand omd
@danielbrody382Ай бұрын
Same, I can't see where that is coming from. It would be more helpful if he explained his workings
@Lalz19978 жыл бұрын
The "Nooooo effect" got me 😂😂👌🏽
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Lalz Boo Haha!
@samimuhammad12012 жыл бұрын
You are the best chemistry teacher
@johnholme1386 жыл бұрын
Flawless video mate, cheers
@benchesters10527 жыл бұрын
could you do a video designated to A2 AQA Equilibrium Constant, Kp with exam questions included? that would be really awesome
@peaceplace45653 жыл бұрын
It would be helpful if u tells us why you’re dividing, subtracting, etc when you’re doing the questions.
@arvingasco76068 жыл бұрын
At 8:50 the units are mol dm^-3 all over 1 which is still just mol dm^-3
@salma-49308 жыл бұрын
Just wanted to notify you that the Redox/Equilibria videos aren't in the phyisical playlists!
@ayesha19292 жыл бұрын
off-topic but your voice is so soothing... btw very helpful videos!
@uas46138 жыл бұрын
BRILLIANT!!!
@georgiahalliday22788 жыл бұрын
this is amazing thank you !!
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Georgia Halliday No worries!
@hppsgm8 жыл бұрын
Oh, just did my CHEM 4 mock 2 hours ago, nevermind at least I can be more prepared for the real exam now thanks to this xD
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+hppsgm Have you completely finished CHEM4?! Or do you do all of CHEM4 and then start CHEM5?
@hppsgm8 жыл бұрын
+E Rintoul We have done learning all of CHEM 4 and start learning CHEM 5 after the half term in January. We started CHEM 4 straight after are AS exams were over last year so that's why we've finished now.
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
hppsgm I seeeee. So you've not done any CHEM5 at this point?
@hppsgm8 жыл бұрын
+E Rintoul No, we haven't done any CHEM5 at this point, so no doubt your videos will really help a lot. Are teachers described CHEM5 as "it either makes you or breaks you" so this is going to be interesting....
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
hppsgm Haha! Yeah, CHEM5 can be a bit of a killer BUT if you can do well on it, it's a really great chance to get loads of UMS as the grade boundaries are normally quite low!
@catherineaalders9208 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your new videos :)
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Catherine Aalders No problem at all :)
@donnylass92l398 жыл бұрын
this was really helpful thank you!
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Rhiannon Maxey I'm glad!
@GN89548 жыл бұрын
If we're studying the new spec should we watch it with this 'new' equilibrium video or watch it with your old one??
@moelforjani29228 жыл бұрын
And he's back!!!
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+mohamed Ibrahim Oh I never left, Mohamed.
@hamaadsiddiqui54803 жыл бұрын
@@MrERintoul but now you did :(
@gasIighter3 жыл бұрын
8:25 so if the number at the bottom is bigger the units is mol-1dm3?
@xBeeeefy8 жыл бұрын
Skip to 9:00 to learn how to answer the actual questions
@epicspartan106 жыл бұрын
zeyn not all heroes wear capes
@hi440985 жыл бұрын
Archie Goodman hahahah
@azaankhan53344 жыл бұрын
@@epicspartan10 lol🤣
@rifatchowdhury73846 жыл бұрын
Man I wish you were my chemistry teacher
@jackdevin3878 жыл бұрын
What software do you use to make your notes on? :)
@mrqwerty4792 Жыл бұрын
@ohshitwaddup62998 жыл бұрын
YAASSS MY G RINTOUL
@lisaschneider91514 жыл бұрын
Do you have a link for the website you mentioned? - Can't find it. ._.
@WaseemAli-jw8bh6 жыл бұрын
PLEASE GO THROUGH MORE PAST PAPER QUESTIONS!!
@skrrelmi75637 жыл бұрын
where did 0.07 come from, the question said 0.170.? can you please do a video on using the quadratic equation to find Kc when Kc is X
@jcorky915 жыл бұрын
Skrr Elmi for anyone wondering years later, 0.24 - 0.17 = 0.07
@carefull83654 жыл бұрын
Hahaha lol finally understood it tnx
@sagharusman38154 жыл бұрын
@@jcorky91 I wondered lol, Thanks!
@sherrypahilanga21724 жыл бұрын
@@jcorky91 but why did he have to minus. isnt 0.17mol already the mole in equilibrium mixture of CO? am i misinterpreting something wrong? pls help
@DogeDogeriffic3 жыл бұрын
@@sherrypahilanga2172 a year late but screw it. I’m no expert (which is why I watched this video) but I’d assume 0.240 was the initial mol number and 0.170 is the mol after equilibrium was reached. Therefore the mol difference is just before and after so 0.240 - 0.170
@caitlin49388 жыл бұрын
Don't suppose there is a pH of weak acids calculations/ pH calculations involving neutralising video(s) coming soon? Happy New Year! Ps. Your videos are saving my grades right now!! Thank you! :)
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Caitlin I don't know if I've done a weak acids one yet. I thought I had? If not, it'll be done in the future.
@rachel52668 жыл бұрын
Will you be uploading more videos for A2? :D
@-lucifer93286 жыл бұрын
Funny how the practise question that we learnt on the video came in one of my class tests and now I’m watching the video after the test, as Gordon Ramsay would say “FUCK ME!!!!!”
@abcdefghijk___opqrstuvwxyz147 Жыл бұрын
13:17 I don’t understand where 0.070 mol came from, wasn’t it 0.170 mol of CO?
@kemuelfavour92922 ай бұрын
So helpful
@solomonneild40148 жыл бұрын
i am doing something to do with quadratic formulas in our chemical equilibria topic, could you explain what its used for please? Love the videos by the way, recommended them to all my friends
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Solomon Neild No idea. If you can send me an example I may be able to help!
@GeeGeeGweppo8 жыл бұрын
was getting confused at 13:21 but then noticed i did it right. (You said 0.07) but in reality its 0.17 therefore it would be a 1:2 ratio x2 = 0.34 0.38 - 0.34 = 0.04 for H and 0.17 for Methanol? Correct?
@samhansen7947 жыл бұрын
No, I think he's correct
@alexanderazzopardi56817 жыл бұрын
yh i got 0.04
@SentilSpark6 жыл бұрын
LOL SAME profile pic
@yoiki28977 жыл бұрын
Can you apply the ICE box method to the first question?
@abbabbcbbcbb2 жыл бұрын
5 Years later but yeah what he did was an ICE table he just didn't draw the box
@jake.simp118 жыл бұрын
Its great that you're still covering the old spec Sir. Also, i have uni offers from york and manchester to study chemisty, which should i make my first choice?
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+SorleyBoy98 Excellent, well done! That all depends on the offers! The highest offer should go above the other otherwise you stand a chance of not getting a place if you miss you top choice. But, if they are both the same offer, it depends on which uni you like best! I love Manchester as a place and York is lovely too, if a little quieter.
@jake.simp118 жыл бұрын
+E Rintoul Thanks for the advice, great vid as always!
@felicityk48678 жыл бұрын
Aromatic chemistry, next please please please!
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Felicity K Maybe...
@Zen_Zen_Zense3 жыл бұрын
@@MrERintoul 😂😂😂
@rafhi97slem8 жыл бұрын
Could you do more questions about kc and group 7 element?
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+rafhi97slem Probably not. I would say that you need to do those independently to become more confident!
@miyakakinshasa254 жыл бұрын
THANKS A LOT!!!!!!!
@frankding75842 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! Also, does anyone else think that the title gives MCR vibes?
@sophiea26978 жыл бұрын
At 14:24 Q3a where has the hydrogen concentration gone from the methanol concentration (0.14)? Because it's says 0.07. Do you not add the change in concentration for both reactants to get the concentration of the product? (0.21) . I'm confused.
@ES-no3wg8 жыл бұрын
you were great more videos please
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Violla Rama No, YOU were great. There will be more...
@zannatul238 жыл бұрын
how can i explain something in terms of Kc, Ik that pressure and concentration doesn't change the value of Kc??
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+zannatul Zan I'm not sure I understand the question?
@ahmodulkabir67618 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate your videos as they are really helpful. I've had to learn most of the unit 4 content on my own. The teacher that got appointed in September didn't have a proper grasp of the A-Level content and didn't 'teach'. The management have only recently just got rid of her. I'm a bit worried as I feel as though we're behind with things as we haven't even touched Unit 5.Thankfully, having looked at your videos and doing past papers questions has reassured me. Anyways, I was wondering if you'd do any EMPA practice papers?
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Ahmodul Kabir Having looked at a few comments recently, there are a lot of schools that work through CHEM4 first and then move onto CHEM5. We do it differently where I'm at and as such, I have almost finished CHEM 5 with one class and with the other, we are a good way through CHEM4. I would say that by this point you probably want to be about done with CHEM4 so that you have plenty of time for CHEM5. However, you can go quite quickly through CHEM5 if you work hard at it!
@adonis1up8 жыл бұрын
God bless you Mr Rintoul
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Rashid Yousif Cheers, Rashid!
@connorkirk74008 жыл бұрын
Got it 👌🏻
@Amy-le6jp8 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video! Thankyou!!
@a.Bader978 жыл бұрын
Sir, at minute 10:00 you say their is 1.5 moles of B. My question is why didn't you put 1.5 as your coefficient in regards to the B. Because then you wouldn't have 0.4 moles of B (like you did with A) but rather you would have 0.8 as it is now a 1:2 ratio rather than a 1:3 ratio. Can you please clarify this, thank you.
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+"So where are you going?" (chapter 81 verse 26) I'm not sure that you're really understanding what is going on here... The numbers that I wrote down are nothing to do with the ratio, they area the actual values of those reactants and products before and at equilibrium. The ratio can NEVER be 1:2 as the numbers in the equation do not allow this. The ratio of A:C and of B:C is 1:3. ALWAYS. You mention having 0.4 moles of B. That isn't the case, rather, from the amount of C at equilibrium and from the ratio of B to C, we know that 0.4 moles of B must have REACTED, leaving 1.10 moles (1.50 - 0.400). Does that make any more sense now? If not, let me know how I can help further.
@a.Bader978 жыл бұрын
E Rintoul fantastic, you've cleared it up! Thank you so much as always. By the way, how many more videos until you've completed unit 4? Thanks again!
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+"So where are you going?" (chapter 81 verse 26) Oooooh. Not many I don't think. Maybe 4ish?
@a.Bader978 жыл бұрын
E Rintoul "watch out this space!" :)
@georgeashby48524 жыл бұрын
brilliant
@rdunteas15878 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the vids, when you say temperature is the only condition effecting kc why doesn't pressure effect it? as surely the equilibrium will shift depending on number of moles therefore changeingthe amounts of reactants and products
@ENZOxDV98 жыл бұрын
found out yet I'm a bit confused on that too
@rdunteas15878 жыл бұрын
+ENZOxDV9 unfortunately not!
@ENZOxDV98 жыл бұрын
Sebastian Owen i think it's because the equilibrium constant is only a measure of concentration so although there are moles the constant won't change by it.dunno why temperature changes it
@mujdafy8 жыл бұрын
Because pressure has the same effect as concentration, its the change of the amount of molecules in a given volume therefore would not have an effect on Kc because the pressure of the molecules on the opposite reaction would change too
@ibrahimshafi20645 жыл бұрын
At 14:00 it's 0.170, not 0.0700
@Mo786productions4 жыл бұрын
Ibrahim Shafi yh exactly
@fatimamarah83152 жыл бұрын
life saver
@bananapancakecat8 ай бұрын
Its 0.07 and 0.24bc: The mole ratio is given in the equation: 1 mole of CO reacts with 2 moles of hydrogen t make 1 mole of methanol If you start off with 0.24 mol of CO and there are 0.17 mol at equilibrium then 0.24 - 0.17 mol of CO have reacted. From the stoichiometry of the equation this makes the same number of moles of methanol. From the stoichiometry of the equation twice of much hydrogen must have reacted. Subtract moles of hydrogen reacted from original moles present (given in the question) to get moles of hydrogen remaining. You now have the number of moles of each component.
@lemonadepie96317 жыл бұрын
YOU ARE SO HELPFUL I HAVE MY CHEM EXAM TOMORROW, BLESS YOU, CHILD
@brokecoder8 жыл бұрын
Sir, Ples may you me reply me? @14:04 i don'nt understand why you subtracted 0.380 and 0.14. Isn't the question asking about how much hydrogen is used to come to an equibrium?
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+MaleVip We know that 0.07 moles of carbon monoxide reacted in reaching equilibrium. Because the ratio of carbon monoxide to hydrogen is 1:2, that means that 0.14 moles of hydrogen must have reacted. Because there were initially 0.38 moles of hydrogen, the amount at equilibrium would be 0.38-0.14. Get it?
@daryasalh49107 жыл бұрын
E Rintoul but its 0.170 not 0.07
@peaceplace45653 жыл бұрын
@@daryasalh4910 no. 0.17 is for carbon monoxide. The question is asking about methanol which is why he subtracted the values.
@fatimaawow31938 жыл бұрын
I love your chemistry videos, could you post similar ones for Biology AQA?
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Fatima Awow I'm considering branching out into Biology but at this point I want to get the Chem videos to a point where I'm really happy with them.
@prisila8888 жыл бұрын
+E Rintoul what about physics
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
M.D.L TM Hmm. I'll never say never! BUT, the last time I did Physics was when I was doing my A-Level back when I was at school!
@cameronretason50737 жыл бұрын
don't get where 0.07 came from wasn't it 0.17
@maryel62667 жыл бұрын
Cameron retason yeah
@joana3593 жыл бұрын
I'm very late but you do 0.240-0.170 which gives you 0.07 moles that reacted.
@razmatenachrazmaten53202 жыл бұрын
@@joana359 do you know why before equilibrium, there are 2.5 moles in total of reactants and products but then at equilibrium (11:31) there are 2.9 moles in total? How does that make sense?
@xenne.2 жыл бұрын
How did he get 0.07 for methanol
@jacobsuresh37433 жыл бұрын
Legend
@tejpatel26595 жыл бұрын
Just out of curiosity, what effect does increasing temperate have on Kc?
@areebaa15955 жыл бұрын
i will try and explain this: so, an increase in the concentration of products (or a decrease in the reactants) will cause Kc to increase. but a decrease in the concentration of products (or a increase in the reactants) will cause Kc to decrease. you should also note that you can find out if the products/reactants are being increased/decreased using Le Chateliers. hope this helped xx
@ibrahimshafi20645 жыл бұрын
@@areebaa1595 conc doesn't have an effect on Kc value... What you're saying is correct form equilibrium, howevever, temp does have an effect the Kc value but only temp
@areebaa15955 жыл бұрын
@@ibrahimshafi2064 i believe it is relative to each other but i will check my notes just to make sure :)
@hafsahk13103 жыл бұрын
Why does temperature affect the equilibrium constant Kc?
@hafsahk13102 жыл бұрын
aired
@mzmz123456 жыл бұрын
Why do you divide by the volume?
@edwardharrison73738 жыл бұрын
Excuse me sir, but the question at 12:00 is confusing me. If the hydrogen lost 0.14mols then surely the methanol will have gained those moles aswel as the moles lost from the carbon monoxide? totalling at 0.21 moles of ethanol?
@kadekevin5668 жыл бұрын
same question here!
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Edward Harrison Nope. It may help to actually draw the structures of the substances in order to actually see what it going where...
@macbookpro80146 жыл бұрын
Could you please incorporate some exam questions into these videos? Thank you so much and these tutorials are very helpful!
@jsbaasi5 жыл бұрын
look at the other half of the video you silly goon
@moneyhoneyhoney90478 жыл бұрын
How does the kc change with temp? does it increase as temperature does??
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
It all depends on the equilibrium and in which direction the reaction is exothermic/endothermic.
@NiaKF8 жыл бұрын
Why did you square 0.275/1.50 and not the one next to it ?
@markp37208 жыл бұрын
+Nía Feisal As that is for the H2 and there is 2 moles of H2 in the equation so the concentration of H2 (in the equation for Kc) is squared. But the one next to it (which is the Concentration of CO) is not squared as there is only one mole of CO in the equation so the concentration of CO is to the power of 1 (so not squared). Hope this helps!!
@NiaKF8 жыл бұрын
+Marco Polo I see, thank you
@Glitterfm21338 жыл бұрын
How do you calculate this with your brainnnnn?
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Glitterfm2133 Haha. I don't, I cheat and use a calculator but I don't put it in as there's no need for everyone to see it!
@reiantaank33148 жыл бұрын
Sir, it should be mol dm-3 for the first equilibrium constant, instead of 'mol-1 dm3'. 8:30ish.
@aneeqster58 жыл бұрын
+Reian Taank Did you watch the video without sound?
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Reian Taank I actually am watching it without sound so I don't know...
@reiantaank33148 жыл бұрын
+E Rintoul Nah, you were right.
@Useless03056 жыл бұрын
You're a fucking god, make this stuff so simple, thank you
@anasmohamed71108 ай бұрын
14:22 I think you accidentally used 0.07 instead of 0.17 moles for carbon monoxide?
@tomtom80575 жыл бұрын
Fok i dont understand how do you get 0.4? From A+B equilibrium 3C?
@Zara-el6yq5 жыл бұрын
Tom Tom 3 moles of C is 1.20, so 1 mole would be 1.2 / 3 = 0.4 moles
@bazi56467 жыл бұрын
Hopefully my Paper 1 exam goes well today...!
@maryel62667 жыл бұрын
Bazi Reloaded same
@Psyxiiko3 ай бұрын
@@maryel6266 how did you do?
@klausaceline7027 Жыл бұрын
hi sir can i ask where do you get 0.070?
@abdullahsaim5593 Жыл бұрын
I guess that is a typo cause it was supposed to be 0.170
@yujirohanma203 Жыл бұрын
@@abdullahsaim5593 no it is meant to be 0.070 as that's how much methanol is produced
@yask79828 жыл бұрын
you failied to mention about what would happen when there's two or more mol/ dm3 on the top or on the bottom on 8:50
@yask79828 жыл бұрын
Failed*
@MrERintoul8 жыл бұрын
+Yas K Correct.
@moneyhoneyhoney90478 жыл бұрын
please explain?
@ConquerMirage7 жыл бұрын
why is dm^-3 X dm^-3 -6? Why is it not -9 ( 3 X 3 = 9)
@cosminlive1997 жыл бұрын
Rules of indices. When you multiply two numbers you ADD the powers. so dm^-3 x dm^-3 = dm^-6 as -3+-3 = -6
@ConquerMirage7 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@mujdafy8 жыл бұрын
I love you lol :(
@barbodoskoueian59593 жыл бұрын
mate shouldnt it be mol2 dm9?
@muadhzahoor64212 жыл бұрын
yes i think it should
@muadhzahoor64212 жыл бұрын
@rohan ahh yes thanks for that, that rule completely slipped my mind
@Jessica-xw1rb6 жыл бұрын
this topic (the calculations specifically) is making me so stressed out and angry
@kumaxtalk8 жыл бұрын
Can you write bigger please, there's just so much space.
@jahnavi1298 Жыл бұрын
stop with the adverts every two seconds istg
@gankingmaster15574 жыл бұрын
Shits still useful bro cheers
@Geassmaster558 жыл бұрын
More past paper questions on these please
@trigobrooken62602 жыл бұрын
SIr what writing program are you using
@abirulislam6646 жыл бұрын
-3 x -3 = 9 not 6 btw
@MrERintoul6 жыл бұрын
Abirul Islam when you multiply things with indices, the indices are added.
@maryel62667 жыл бұрын
I have my chem exam today and I haven't even revised anything